T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
G\u00dcR\u00c7AY BAYLAR BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/2019)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 17\/7\/2024<\/p>\n
R.G. Tarih ve Say\u0131: 17\/12\/2024-32755<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Selahaddin MENTE\u015e<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130rfan F\u0130DAN<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Muhterem \u0130NCE<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Ay\u015fenur TUNCER<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
G\u00fcr\u00e7ay BAYLAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru; ceza infaz kurumunda yerle\u015ftirildi\u011fi yeni odan\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f saatlerinin \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131n okul saati ile \u00e7ak\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 nedeniyle oda de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fine ili\u015fkin i\u015flemin iptali talebinin reddedilmesiyle aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n, yeni odan\u0131n ko\u015fullar\u0131 nedeniyle maddi ve manevi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n korunmas\u0131 ve geli\u015ftirilmesi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvuru tarihinde Sincan 2 No.lu F Tipi Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumunda (Kurum) h\u00fck\u00fcm\u00f6zl\u00fc olarak bulunan ba\u015fvurucunun odas\u0131 23\/10\/2019 tarihinde Kurum taraf\u0131ndan de\u011fi\u015ftirilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, an\u0131lan i\u015fleme kar\u015f\u0131 31\/10\/2019 tarihinde Ankara Bat\u0131 2. \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine (\u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi) \u015fik\u00e2yet ba\u015fvurusunda bulunmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fvurucu; \u015fik\u00e2yet dilek\u00e7esinde eski odas\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f saatinin 15.45-16.30 aras\u0131nda olmas\u0131 nedeniyle \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131n okul saati ile \u00e7ak\u0131\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, oda arkada\u015flar\u0131yla uyum i\u00e7inde ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, yeni odas\u0131n\u0131n kuzey cepheye bakt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, yeterince \u0131s\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu nedenle tedavisi devam eden mevcut kalp, tansiyon ve mide hastal\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n olumsuz y\u00f6nde etkilendi\u011fini belirterek oda de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fine ili\u015fkin i\u015flemin geri al\u0131narak \u00f6nceki odas\u0131na iadesine karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
3. \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi 31\/10\/2019 tarihinde \u015fik\u00e2yetin reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. Kurum M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn 31\/10\/2019 tarihli yaz\u0131s\u0131nda, ba\u015fvurucunun dilek\u00e7esine konu etti\u011fi hususlar hakk\u0131nda Kuruma herhangi bir belge sunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve rahats\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin doktor raporunun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bildirilmi\u015ftir. Kararda ise Kurum taraf\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucunun su\u00e7 t\u00fcr\u00fcne g\u00f6re ve idari nedenlerle odas\u0131n\u0131n de\u011fi\u015ftirildi\u011fi, oda de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fine ili\u015fkin dilek\u00e7esine konu etti\u011fi hususlar hakk\u0131nda bildirdi\u011fi mazeretine dair herhangi bir belge ve rapor ibraz etmedi\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. S\u00f6z konusu karara kar\u015f\u0131 ba\u015fvurucunun yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz, Ankara Bat\u0131 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin (A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi) 15\/11\/2019 tarihli karar\u0131yla reddedilmi\u015ftir. Kararda, \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fince verilen kararda usule ve kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir y\u00f6n\u00fcn bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifade edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. Ba\u015fvurucu, nihai h\u00fckm\u00fc 26\/11\/2019 tarihinde tebell\u00fc\u011f ettikten sonra 24\/12\/2019 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
5. Komisyon, ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
6. \u00d6deme g\u00fcc\u00fcnden yoksun oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurucunun adli yard\u0131m talebinin kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
A. Aile Hayat\u0131na Sayg\u0131 Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
7. Ba\u015fvurucu; yerle\u015ftirildi\u011fi odan\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f saatinin 13.15-14.00 aras\u0131 oldu\u011funu, \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131n okul saati ile \u00e7ak\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, eski odas\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f saatinin ise 15.45-16.30 aras\u0131nda olmas\u0131 nedeniyle \u00e7ocuklar\u0131yla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015febildi\u011fini ifade ederek oda de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi yap\u0131lmas\u0131 ve i\u015flemin iptali talebinin reddedilmesi nedeniyle aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
8. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde, ba\u015fvurucunun g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f saatlerine ili\u015fkin bir d\u00fczenleme yap\u0131lmas\u0131 hususunda Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumuna ve yarg\u0131lama makamlar\u0131na bir m\u00fcracaatta bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilerek g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f saatlerine ili\u015fkin durumunu di\u011fer mazeretleri ile oda de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi i\u015fleminin geri al\u0131nmas\u0131 i\u00e7in dile getirdi\u011fi vurgulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu do\u011frultuda ba\u015fvurucunun \u00f6ncelikle kendisine makul bir ba\u015far\u0131 \u015fans\u0131 sunabilecek ve \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm sa\u011flayabilecek nitelikte, kullan\u0131labilir ve etkili olan ba\u015fvuru yolunu t\u00fcketmesi gerekti\u011fi de\u011ferlendirilerek yap\u0131lacak kabul edilebilirlik incelenmesinde bu hususun da dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi ifade edilmi\u015ftir. Bunun yan\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edilip edilmedi\u011fi konusunda inceleme yap\u0131l\u0131rken Anayasa ve ilgili mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmleri, Anayasa Mahkemesi i\u00e7tihad\u0131 ve somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n nazara al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fvurucu; Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyan\u0131nda oda de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi yap\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in gerek\u00e7elerini ileri s\u00fcrerek ma\u011fduriyetinin giderilmesini talep etti\u011fini, \u00f6ncelikle g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f saati de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi talep etmesi gerekti\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki iddiay\u0131 kabul etmedi\u011fini, Kurumun t\u00fcm bilgi ve belgelere sahip oldu\u011funu ve kendisinden de belge talep edilmedi\u011fini ifade ederek ihlal iddialar\u0131n\u0131 tekrar etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
10. Ba\u015fvurucu; Kurum taraf\u0131ndan oda de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi yap\u0131lmas\u0131 \u00fczerine yerle\u015ftirildi\u011fi odan\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f saatinin \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131n okul saati ile \u00e7ak\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 nedeniyle \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6remeyece\u011fini, bu durumun da aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131 ihlal edece\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Ba\u015fvurucunun \u015fik\u00e2yetinin \u00f6z\u00fcn\u00fc, oda de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi yap\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle do\u011fan sonu\u00e7lar olu\u015fturmaktad\u0131r. Bu durumda \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ba\u015fvuruda da bu durumu ifade eden ba\u015fvurucudan g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f saatinin de\u011fi\u015ftirilmesi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde ayr\u0131ca bir talepte bulunmas\u0131n\u0131n beklenmesi ve ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmedi\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015fmak m\u00fcmk\u00fcn g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir. B\u00f6ylelikle a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
11. Aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131, Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 20. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ayr\u0131ca Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 41. maddesinin -Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n b\u00fct\u00fcnselli\u011fi ilkesi gere\u011fi- \u00f6zellikle aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131na ili\u015fkin pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerin de\u011ferlendirilmesi ba\u011flam\u0131nda dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r (Murat At\u0131lgan, B. No: 2013\/9047, 7\/5\/2015, \u00a7 22; Marcus Frank Cerny [GK], B. No: 2013\/5126, 2\/7\/2015, \u00a7 36; Yeliz Erten, B. No: 2020\/99, 11\/3\/2021, \u00a7 34). Devletin pozitif tedbirler alma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc konusunda Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 20. ve 41. maddeleri ebeveynin \u00e7ocu\u011fuyla b\u00fct\u00fcnle\u015fmesinin sa\u011flanmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla tedbirler al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131 isteme hakk\u0131n\u0131 ve kamusal makamlar\u0131n bu t\u00fcr tedbirleri alma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc i\u00e7ermektedir. Anayasa’n\u0131n 41. maddesinde de her \u00e7ocu\u011fun y\u00fcksek yarar\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmad\u0131k\u00e7a anne ve babas\u0131yla ki\u015fisel, do\u011frudan ili\u015fki kurma ve s\u00fcrd\u00fcrme hakk\u0131na sahip oldu\u011fu a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtilmektedir. Ancak bu y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fck mutlak olmay\u0131p her olay\u0131n \u00f6zel ko\u015fullar\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak al\u0131nacak tedbirlerin nitelik ve kapsam\u0131 farkl\u0131la\u015fabilmektedir (Marcus Frank Cerny, \u00a7 41; Yeliz Erten, \u00a7 35).<\/p>\n
12. Anayasa’n\u0131n 19. maddesi gere\u011fince h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc ve tutuklular\u0131n haberle\u015fme h\u00fcrriyeti ve aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n s\u0131n\u0131rlanmas\u0131, hukuka uygun olarak ceza infaz kurumunda tutulman\u0131n ka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131lmaz ve do\u011fal bir sonucudur. \u00d6te yandan h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc ve tutuklular\u0131n aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 g\u00f6sterilmesi hakk\u0131, ceza infaz kurumu idaresinin h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc ve tutuklular\u0131n ailesi ve yak\u0131nlar\u0131yla temas\u0131n\u0131 devam ettirecek \u00f6nlemleri almas\u0131n\u0131 zorunlu k\u0131lmaktad\u0131r (Mehmet Zahit \u015eahin, B. No: 2013\/4708, 20\/4\/2016, \u00a7 36; Yeliz Erten, \u00a7 36). Bununla beraber bu y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fck yerine getirilirken ceza infaz kurumunda tutulman\u0131n ka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131lmaz ve do\u011fal sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6zetilmesi gerekmektedir. Bu ba\u011flamda kamu d\u00fczeninin sa\u011flanmas\u0131 ve su\u00e7 i\u015flenmesinin \u00f6nlenmesi ile aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 g\u00f6sterilmesi hakk\u0131 aras\u0131nda adil bir denge sa\u011flanmal\u0131d\u0131r (Mehmet Zahit \u015eahin, \u00a7 37). Ayr\u0131ca bu kapsamdaki talepler hakk\u0131nda idari ve yarg\u0131sal makamlar taraf\u0131ndan verilen kararlar\u0131n gerek\u00e7eleri ikna edici \u015fekilde ilgili ve yeterli olmal\u0131d\u0131r (Yeliz Erten, \u00a7 37).<\/p>\n
13. \u00d6te yandan Anayasa’n\u0131n 41. maddesinde ifade edilen \u00e7ocu\u011fun y\u00fcksek yarar\u0131 mahkemeler, idari makamlar ve yasama organ\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan ve \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 ilgilendiren b\u00fct\u00fcn faaliyetlerde g\u00f6zetilmesi gereken bir ilkedir. Bu ba\u011flamda \u00e7ocuklar \u00fczerinde etki do\u011furacak bir i\u015flem yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 zaman bu i\u015flemin \u00e7ocu\u011fun yarar\u0131na uygun olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde bir de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmas\u0131 aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerin yerine getirilmesi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan olduk\u00e7a \u00f6nemlidir (\u015e\u00fckran \u0130rge, B. No: 2016\/8660, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7 33; Yeliz Erten, \u00a7 38).<\/p>\n
14. Somut olayda ba\u015fvurucu, yerle\u015ftirildi\u011fi odan\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f saatinin \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131n okul saati ile \u00e7ak\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 nedeniyle \u00e7ocuklar\u0131yla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015femedi\u011fini ifade ederek oda de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi i\u015fleminin iptali talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fvurucunun \u015fik\u00e2yet ba\u015fvurusu, mazeretine ili\u015fkin herhangi bir belge ve rapor ibraz etmedi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle reddedilmi\u015ftir. \u0130tiraz ba\u015fvurusu neticesinde ise Kurum karar\u0131n\u0131n usule ve kanuna uygun oldu\u011fu sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucunun \u00f6nceki odas\u0131nda uygulanan g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f saatleriniyarg\u0131lama makamlar\u0131na belirterek \u00f6\u011frenim g\u00f6ren \u00e7ocuklar\u0131yla yeni odas\u0131nda uygulanan g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f saatleri nedeniyle ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ileti\u015fim s\u0131k\u0131nt\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 somutla\u015ft\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Bu duruma ra\u011fmen yarg\u0131lama makamlar\u0131n\u0131n kararlar\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun an\u0131lan itiraz\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak uygulaman\u0131n hakl\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6sterecek \u015fekilde \u00e7ocu\u011fun \u00fcst\u00fcn yarar\u0131 ilkesi \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde ilgili ve yeterli gerek\u00e7e ortaya konuldu\u011funu s\u00f6ylemek g\u00fc\u00e7t\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
15. Ayr\u0131ca yukar\u0131da belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere (bkz. \u00a7\u00a7 11-13) mahkemeler, idari makamlar ve yasama organ\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan ve \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 ilgilendiren b\u00fct\u00fcn faaliyetlerde \u00e7ocu\u011fun \u00fcst\u00fcn yarar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6zetilmesi ve aile ili\u015fkilerinin s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclmesini sa\u011flayacak \u015fekilde hareket edilmesi devletin pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerinin gere\u011fidir. Bu ba\u011flamda idarenin uygulamas\u0131 ve yarg\u0131 kararlar\u0131 birlikte de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde \u00e7ocu\u011fun \u00fcst\u00fcn yarar\u0131 g\u00f6zetilerek aile ili\u015fkilerinin devaml\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flayacak \u015fekilde hareket edilmedi\u011fi, ba\u015fvurucunun talebinin neden kar\u015f\u0131lanamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususunda kararlarda somut ve yeterli \u015fekilde gerek\u00e7e sunulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmakla somut olay\u0131n ko\u015fullar\u0131nda aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan devletten beklenen pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerin yerine getirilmedi\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (benzer y\u00f6ndeki de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7in bkz. \u00dcmit Balaban (3), B. No: 2016\/2821, 29\/5\/2019; Levent Serhat Bayar, B. No: 2018\/33714, 28\/12\/2021, \u00a7 36; Yeliz Erten, \u00a7 43).<\/p>\n
16. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 20. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
B. Maddi ve Manevi Varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n Korunmas\u0131 ve Geli\u015ftirilmesi Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
17. Ba\u015fvurucu; verdi\u011fi dilek\u00e7elerin Kurum taraf\u0131ndan kabul edilmedi\u011fini veya talep dilek\u00e7elerine cevap verilmedi\u011fini, yerle\u015ftirildi\u011fi yeni odan\u0131n so\u011fuk ve k\u00fcfl\u00fc oldu\u011funu, hastal\u0131klar\u0131 oldu\u011funu, daha \u00f6nce odada kalan ki\u015filerin sa\u011fl\u0131k problemleri nedeniyle odadan ayr\u0131ld\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6\u011frendi\u011fini belirterek dilek\u00e7e hakk\u0131n\u0131n, sa\u011fl\u0131kl\u0131 bir ortamda ya\u015fama hakk\u0131n\u0131n ve ayr\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131k yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
18. Ba\u015fvurucunun ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc iddialar\u0131n bir b\u00fct\u00fcn h\u00e2linde maddi ve manevi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n korunmas\u0131 ve geli\u015ftirilmesi hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmesi gerekti\u011fi de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
19. \u0130hlal iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkin delilleri sunma ve temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin a\u00e7\u0131klamalarda bulunma y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn yerine getirilmedi\u011fi, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla iddialar\u0131n temellendirilmedi\u011fi durumlarda kabul edilemezlik karar\u0131 verilebilir (Cemal G\u00fcnsel [GK], B. No: 2016\/12900, 21\/1\/2021).<\/p>\n
20. Ba\u015fvurucunun rahats\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin doktor raporunun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n Kurum taraf\u0131ndan \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine bildirildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Bunun yan\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine sundu\u011fu bir rapor bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespitine kararda yer verildi\u011finden yarg\u0131lama makamlar\u0131n\u0131n ilgili ve yeterli gerek\u00e7e ortaya koydu\u011fu sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, maddi ve manevi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n korunmas\u0131 ve geli\u015ftirilmesi hakk\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen ihlal iddialar\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun oldu\u011fu de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
21. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurunun bu k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M<\/p>\n
22. Ba\u015fvurucu; ihlalin tespiti, ihlalin giderilmesi, 50.000 TL maddi tazminat ve 50.000 TL manevi tazminat talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
23. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamda karar\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi yarg\u0131 mercilerince yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden yarg\u0131lama i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flatmak ve Anayasa Mahkemesini ihlal sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131ran nedenleri gideren, ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere uygun yeni bir karar vermektir (Mehmet Do\u011fan [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n
24. \u00d6te yandan eski h\u00e2le getirme kural\u0131 \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde ihlalin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n b\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcyle ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in ba\u015fvurucuya manevi zararlar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda net 30.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00f6denmesi gerekti\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu, maddi zarara ili\u015fkin olarak bilgi\/belge sunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan maddi tazminat talebinin reddine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Adli yard\u0131m talebinin KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n
B. 1. Aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
2. Maddi ve manevi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n korunmas\u0131 ve geli\u015ftirilmesi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
C. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 20. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmak amac\u0131yla Ankara Bat\u0131 2. \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine (E.2019\/2651, K.2019\/2647) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. Ba\u015fvurucuya net 30.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE, tazminata ili\u015fkin di\u011fer taleplerin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
F. \u00d6demenin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
G. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 17\/7\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 17\/7\/2024 tarihli ve 2020\/2019 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 G\u00dcR\u00c7AY BAYLAR BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/2019) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 17\/7\/2024 R.G. Tarih ve Say\u0131: 17\/12\/2024-32755 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ \u00a0 \u00a0 Selahaddin MENTE\u015e \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130rfan F\u0130DAN \u00a0 \u00a0 Muhterem \u0130NCE Raport\u00f6r : Ay\u015fenur TUNCER Ba\u015fvurucu : G\u00fcr\u00e7ay BAYLAR \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru; ceza infaz kurumunda yerle\u015ftirildi\u011fi yeni odan\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f saatlerinin \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131n okul saati ile \u00e7ak\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 nedeniyle oda de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fine ili\u015fkin i\u015flemin iptali talebinin reddedilmesiyle aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n, yeni odan\u0131n ko\u015fullar\u0131 nedeniyle maddi ve manevi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n korunmas\u0131 ve geli\u015ftirilmesi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvuru tarihinde Sincan 2 No.lu F Tipi Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumunda (Kurum) h\u00fck\u00fcm\u00f6zl\u00fc olarak bulunan ba\u015fvurucunun odas\u0131 23\/10\/2019 tarihinde Kurum taraf\u0131ndan de\u011fi\u015ftirilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, an\u0131lan i\u015fleme kar\u015f\u0131 31\/10\/2019 tarihinde Ankara Bat\u0131 2. \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine (\u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi) \u015fik\u00e2yet ba\u015fvurusunda bulunmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fvurucu; \u015fik\u00e2yet dilek\u00e7esinde eski odas\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f saatinin 15.45-16.30 aras\u0131nda olmas\u0131 nedeniyle \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131n okul saati ile \u00e7ak\u0131\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, oda arkada\u015flar\u0131yla uyum i\u00e7inde ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, yeni odas\u0131n\u0131n kuzey cepheye bakt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, yeterince \u0131s\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu nedenle tedavisi devam eden mevcut kalp, tansiyon ve mide hastal\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n olumsuz y\u00f6nde etkilendi\u011fini belirterek oda de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fine ili\u015fkin i\u015flemin geri al\u0131narak \u00f6nceki odas\u0131na iadesine …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27,535],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-21134","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber","category-uncategorized-tr"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n