T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
MEHMET MET\u0130N BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/30431)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 23\/10\/2024<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Selahaddin MENTE\u015e<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130rfan F\u0130DAN<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan SARA\u00c7<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Mehmet MET\u0130N<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, disiplin cezas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 infaz h\u00e2kimli\u011fine yap\u0131lan \u015fik\u00e2yette h\u00e2kim taraf\u0131ndan s\u00f6zl\u00fc savunma al\u0131nmadan karar verilmesi nedeniyle adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Bo\u011fazl\u0131yan T Tipi Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumunda (\u0130nfaz Kurumu) h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc olarak bulunan ba\u015fvurucuya “Her t\u00fcrl\u00fc ate\u015fli silah, mermi, patlay\u0131c\u0131 madde, kesici, delici, yaralay\u0131c\u0131, bereleyici alet, yak\u0131c\u0131, a\u015f\u0131nd\u0131r\u0131c\u0131, bo\u011fucu, bay\u0131lt\u0131c\u0131, k\u00f6r edici gaz ve ecza, her t\u00fcrl\u00fc zehir ve uyu\u015fturucu ila\u00e7 ve madde, cep telefonu, telsiz ve sair elektronik haberle\u015fme arac\u0131n\u0131 kuruma sokmak, bulundurmak, kullanmak” fiilini i\u015fledi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle 13\/12\/2004 tarihli ve 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza ve G\u00fcvenlik Tedbirlerinin \u0130nfaz\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 44. maddesinin (3) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (g) bendi uyar\u0131nca 11 g\u00fcn h\u00fccreye koyma disiplin cezas\u0131 verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fvurucu an\u0131lan disiplin cezas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 Bo\u011fazl\u0131yan \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi (\u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi) nezdinde \u015fik\u00e2yet yoluna ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur. \u015eik\u00e2yet dilek\u00e7esinde kamera kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesini talep eden ba\u015fvurucu, gerekirse Ses ve G\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc Bili\u015fim Sisteminin (SEGB\u0130S) kullan\u0131labilece\u011fini de hat\u0131rlatarak savunmas\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6zl\u00fc olarak yapmak istedi\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi, yap\u0131lan disiplin soru\u015fturmas\u0131n\u0131n usul\u00fcne uygun y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcye verilen cezan\u0131n eylemine uygun oldu\u011fu, disiplin kurulu ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ceza verme karar\u0131ndaki gerek\u00e7elerinin yeterli ve yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc gerek\u00e7esiyle itiraz\u0131n reddine karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucu bu karara kar\u015f\u0131 Bo\u011fazl\u0131yan A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinde (A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi) itirazda bulunmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fvurucu itiraz dilek\u00e7esinde \u00fc\u00e7 b\u0131\u00e7akl\u0131 t\u0131ra\u015f b\u0131\u00e7a\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ikisinin \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131ndaki maksad\u0131n\u0131n sa\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 kesmek oldu\u011funu, nitekim sa\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 lavaboda kesti\u011fini, kurum g\u00f6revlilerine zarar vermek i\u00e7in kullanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kamera kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesi h\u00e2linde sa\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n kesimine dair g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerin ortaya \u00e7\u0131kaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131, disiplin soru\u015fturmas\u0131 ile \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011findeki itirazlar\u0131nda bu hususu dile getirmesine ra\u011fmen kay\u0131tlar\u0131n incelenmedi\u011fini, \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011finin karar\u0131nda buna dair de\u011ferlendirmelerin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, duru\u015fmada s\u00f6zl\u00fc savunmadan mahrum b\u0131rak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6ne s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
6. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi 10\/8\/2020 tarihinde, \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi karar\u0131n\u0131n dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re usul ve kanuna uygun oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle itiraz\u0131n reddine karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. Nihai karar\u0131n 21\/8\/2020 tarihinde tebli\u011f edilmesinin ard\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucu 28\/8\/2020 tarihinde adli yard\u0131m talepli olarak bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
8. Anayasa Mahkemesinin Mehmet \u015eerif Ay (B. No: 2012\/1181, 17\/9\/2013) karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkeler dikkate al\u0131narak, ge\u00e7imini \u00f6nemli \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde g\u00fc\u00e7le\u015ftirmeksizin yarg\u0131lama giderlerini \u00f6deme g\u00fcc\u00fcnden yoksun oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurucunun adli yard\u0131m talebinin kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fvurucu; soru\u015fturman\u0131n hi\u00e7bir evresinde ifadesinin al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, disiplin cezas\u0131n\u0131n yasal s\u00fcreler ge\u00e7mesine ra\u011fmen uyguland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek savunma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ve adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k), g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde konuya ili\u015fkin olarak Anayasa Mahkemesi i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131na yer verdikten sonra s\u00f6z konusu i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir. Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 ba\u015fvurucu, bireysel ba\u015fvuru formunda ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc hususlar\u0131 tekrarlam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
10. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir. <\/p>\n
11. Ba\u015fvurucunun \u015fik\u00e2yetleri adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki s\u00f6zl\u00fc yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
12. Anayasa Mahkemesi somut ba\u015fvuru ile benzer nitelikteki ihlal iddialar\u0131n\u0131 Talet \u015eanl\u0131 [GK] (B. No: 2017\/20526, 17\/1\/2023) karar\u0131nda incelemi\u015ftir. An\u0131lan kararda 16\/5\/2001 tarihli ve 4675 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi Kanunu\u2019nun 6. maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda \u201cDisiplin cezas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131lan \u015fik\u00e2yet \u00fczerine infaz h\u00e2kimi, h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc veya tutuklunun savunmas\u0131n\u0131 ald\u0131ktan ve talep edilen di\u011fer delilleri toplay\u0131p de\u011ferlendirdikten sonra karar\u0131n\u0131 verir. H\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc veya tutuklu, savunmas\u0131n\u0131, haz\u0131r bulunmak ve vekaletnamesini ibraz etmek ko\u015fuluyla avukat\u0131yla birlikte veya avukat\u0131 arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla yapabilir. \u0130nfaz h\u00e2kimi gerekli g\u00f6rmesi durumunda h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc veya tutuklunun savunmas\u0131n\u0131 ceza infaz kurumunda da alabilir.\u201d h\u00fckm\u00fcne yer verildi\u011fi belirtilmi\u015f, s\u00f6z konusu h\u00fckm\u00fcn esas olarak disiplin cezalar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik \u015fik\u00e2yetlerin karara ba\u011flanmas\u0131ndan \u00f6nce ilgilinin savunmas\u0131n\u0131n infaz h\u00e2kimi taraf\u0131ndan dinlenmesini ve talep edilen di\u011fer delillerin toplan\u0131p de\u011ferlendirilmesini gerektirdi\u011fi ifade edilmi\u015ftir. H\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc ya da tutuklunun mahkeme huzurunda bulunmas\u0131n\u0131n usul hukuku ba\u011flam\u0131nda duru\u015fma veya farkl\u0131 y\u00f6ntemlerle sa\u011flanabilece\u011fine, nitekim an\u0131lan Kanun\u2019da infaz h\u00e2kiminin s\u00f6z konusu savunmay\u0131 duru\u015fma a\u00e7mak suretiyle ya da duru\u015fma yapmaks\u0131z\u0131n odas\u0131nda veya duru\u015fma salonunda yahut ceza infaz kurumunda almas\u0131na imk\u00e2n tan\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131na i\u015faret edilen kararda, Kanun\u2019da \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen s\u00f6z konusu usuldeki temel amac\u0131n disiplin yapt\u0131r\u0131m\u0131 uygulanan h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc ya da tutuklunun h\u00e2kim kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda meram\u0131n\u0131 anlatabilmesini, dosyada aleyhine olan delillere etkili bir \u015fekilde kar\u015f\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kabilmesini sa\u011flamak oldu\u011fu vurgulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu tespit ve de\u011ferlendirmeler \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda kararda; 4675 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 6. maddesinde disiplin cezalar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131lan \u015fik\u00e2yette ba\u015fvurucuya, savunmas\u0131n\u0131 h\u00e2kim \u00f6n\u00fcnde bizzat haz\u0131r bulunmak suretiyle veya avukat\u0131 arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla dile getirme imk\u00e2n\u0131 tan\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 h\u00e2lde \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011finin ba\u015fvurucunun bu y\u00f6ndeki talebini dikkate almaks\u0131z\u0131n \u015fik\u00e2yetin esas\u0131n\u0131 dosya \u00fczerinden de\u011ferlendirerek karara ba\u011flamas\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvurucunun s\u00f6zl\u00fc yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131na yap\u0131lan m\u00fcdahaleyi kanunilik unsurundan yoksun b\u0131rakt\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilerek ba\u015fvurucunun Anayasa’n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki s\u00f6zl\u00fc yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (Talet \u015eanl\u0131, \u00a7\u00a7 48-69).<\/p>\n
13. Somut olayda, ba\u015fvurucunun disiplin cezas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 s\u00f6zl\u00fc beyanda bulunma talebini a\u00e7\u0131k ve net \u015fekilde yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecinde dile getirmesine ra\u011fmen bu talebi kar\u015f\u0131lanmaks\u0131z\u0131n karar verildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden Talet \u015eanl\u0131 karar\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerden ve ula\u015f\u0131lan sonu\u00e7tan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren bir durum bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
14. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurucunun Anayasa’n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki s\u00f6zl\u00fc yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M <\/p>\n
15. Ba\u015fvurucu, ihlalin tespiti ile miktar belirtmeksizin tazminat talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
16. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamda karar\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi yarg\u0131 mercilerince yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden yarg\u0131lama i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flatmak ve Anayasa Mahkemesini ihlal sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131ran nedenleri gideren, ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere uygun yeni bir karar vermektir (30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 50. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen bireysel ba\u015fvuruya \u00f6zg\u00fc yeniden yarg\u0131lama kurumunun \u00f6zelliklerine ili\u015fkin kapsaml\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamalar i\u00e7in bkz. Mehmet Do\u011fan [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n
17. \u0130hlalin ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n yeterli bir giderim sa\u011flayaca\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan tazminat talebinin reddine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Adli yard\u0131m talebinin KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n
B. S\u00f6zl\u00fc yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
C. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki s\u00f6zl\u00fc yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin s\u00f6zl\u00fc yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere Bo\u011fazl\u0131yan \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine (E.2020\/431, K.2020\/496) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. Ba\u015fvurucunun tazminata ili\u015fkin talebinin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
F. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 23\/10\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 23\/10\/2024 tarihli ve 2020\/30431 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 MEHMET MET\u0130N BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/30431) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 23\/10\/2024 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ \u00a0 \u00a0 Selahaddin MENTE\u015e \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130rfan F\u0130DAN \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : Hasan SARA\u00c7 Ba\u015fvurucu : Mehmet MET\u0130N \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, disiplin cezas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 infaz h\u00e2kimli\u011fine yap\u0131lan \u015fik\u00e2yette h\u00e2kim taraf\u0131ndan s\u00f6zl\u00fc savunma al\u0131nmadan karar verilmesi nedeniyle adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Bo\u011fazl\u0131yan T Tipi Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumunda (\u0130nfaz Kurumu) h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc olarak bulunan ba\u015fvurucuya “Her t\u00fcrl\u00fc ate\u015fli silah, mermi, patlay\u0131c\u0131 madde, kesici, delici, yaralay\u0131c\u0131, bereleyici alet, yak\u0131c\u0131, a\u015f\u0131nd\u0131r\u0131c\u0131, bo\u011fucu, bay\u0131lt\u0131c\u0131, k\u00f6r edici gaz ve ecza, her t\u00fcrl\u00fc zehir ve uyu\u015fturucu ila\u00e7 ve madde, cep telefonu, telsiz ve sair elektronik haberle\u015fme arac\u0131n\u0131 kuruma sokmak, bulundurmak, kullanmak” fiilini i\u015fledi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle 13\/12\/2004 tarihli ve 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza ve G\u00fcvenlik Tedbirlerinin \u0130nfaz\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 44. maddesinin (3) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (g) bendi uyar\u0131nca 11 g\u00fcn h\u00fccreye koyma disiplin cezas\u0131 verilmi\u015ftir. 3. Ba\u015fvurucu an\u0131lan disiplin cezas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 Bo\u011fazl\u0131yan \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi (\u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi) nezdinde \u015fik\u00e2yet yoluna ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur. \u015eik\u00e2yet dilek\u00e7esinde kamera kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesini talep eden ba\u015fvurucu, gerekirse Ses ve G\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc Bili\u015fim Sisteminin (SEGB\u0130S) …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27,535],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-21013","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber","category-uncategorized-tr"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n