T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
H\u00dcSEY\u0130N SARI BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/17577)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 30\/10\/2024<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Ayd\u0131n AYG\u00dcN<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
H\u00fcseyin SARI<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcye kurum d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndan gelen bir dok\u00fcman\u0131n ceza infaz kurumu idaresince verilmemesi nedeniyle ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucu, Akhisar T Tipi Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumunda devletin egemenli\u011fi alt\u0131nda bulunan topraklardan bir k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131 devlet idaresinden ay\u0131rmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmak su\u00e7undan h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc olarak bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fvurucuya ailesi taraf\u0131ndan posta yoluyla bilgisayar \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131s\u0131 bi\u00e7iminde bir dok\u00fcman g\u00f6nderilmi\u015ftir. Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumu E\u011fitim Kurulu Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131nca (E\u011fitim Kurulu) dok\u00fcman incelenmi\u015f; bilgisayar \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131s\u0131 niteli\u011finde ve yay\u0131nevi, yazar\u0131, bas\u0131m tarihi gibi s\u00fcreli s\u00fcresiz yay\u0131nlarda bulunmas\u0131 gereken bilgilerin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, kapa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 dolay\u0131s\u0131yla yay\u0131n kapsam\u0131na girmedi\u011fi gerek\u00e7eleriyle ba\u015fvuru konusu dok\u00fcman\u0131n ba\u015fvurucuya verilmeyerek Kurumda saklanmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. Ba\u015fvurucu, E\u011fitim Kurulu karar\u0131 sonras\u0131nda Akhisar \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine (H\u00e2kimlik) \u015fik\u00e2yet ba\u015fvurusunda bulunmu\u015ftur. H\u00e2kimlik, E\u011fitim Kurulu karar\u0131n\u0131n usul ve kanuna uygun oldu\u011funu belirterek \u015fik\u00e2yeti reddetmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, H\u00e2kimli\u011fin karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 itiraz kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur. \u0130tiraz\u0131 inceleyen Akhisar A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi, H\u00e2kimli\u011fin karar\u0131n\u0131n usul ve kanuna uygun oldu\u011funu belirterek 13\/5\/2020 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucunun itiraz\u0131n\u0131n reddine karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucu, nihai karar\u0131 26\/5\/2020 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frenmi\u015f 1\/6\/2020 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
6. Ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
7. \u00d6deme g\u00fcc\u00fcnden yoksun oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurucunun adli yard\u0131m talebinin kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
8. Ba\u015fvurucu; yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015fiirleri bilgisayarda yaz\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in ailesine g\u00f6nderdi\u011fini, daha sonra bilgisayar \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n posta yoluyla kendisine g\u00f6nderildi\u011fini, E\u011fitim Kurulu karar\u0131yla s\u00f6z konusu \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131n\u0131n verilmedi\u011fini ve al\u0131konuldu\u011funu, bilgisayar \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n i\u00e7eri\u011finde kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir yaz\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlal edildi\u011fini iddia etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
9. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde, ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlal edildi\u011fi \u015fik\u00e2yetine ili\u015fkin olarak Anayasa Mahkemesinin somut olayla benzer olaylarda verdi\u011fi baz\u0131 kararlara, E\u011fitim Kurulunun ve derece mahkemelerinin gerek\u00e7elerine yer verilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucunun kendisine teslim edilmeyen \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131y\u0131 daha \u00f6nce el yaz\u0131s\u0131yla yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kendisine ait \u015fiirlerden olu\u015ftu\u011fu iddias\u0131n\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun g\u00f6nderdi\u011fi el yaz\u0131s\u0131 dok\u00fcmanla kendisine gelen bilgisayar \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131s\u0131 \u015feklindeki dok\u00fcman\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131, i\u00e7eri\u011finde kurum g\u00fcvenli\u011fini tehlikeye sokacak bir hususun bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespit edilmesi gerekti\u011fi, bunun ise ceza infaz kurumunun ko\u015fullar\u0131 ve g\u00f6revlilerin i\u015f y\u00fck\u00fc dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda kar\u015f\u0131lanabilir, makul bir beklenti niteli\u011finde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucunun ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlal edilip edilmedi\u011fi hususunda inceleme yap\u0131l\u0131rken Anayasa ve ilgili mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin, Anayasa Mahkemesi i\u00e7tihad\u0131n\u0131n ve somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi ifade edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyan\u0131nda bireysel ba\u015fvuru formundaki \u015fik\u00e2yetlerini genel olarak tekrarlam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
10. Ba\u015fvurucuya posta yoluyla gelen dok\u00fcman\u0131n Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumu taraf\u0131ndan al\u0131konularak ba\u015fvurucuya verilmemesinin ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
11. Herkes gibi h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc ve tutuklular da Anayasa ve Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi’nin (S\u00f6zle\u015fme) ortak alan\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda kalan temel hak ve h\u00fcrriyetlerin tamam\u0131na (Mehmet Re\u015fit Arslan ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2013\/583, 10\/12\/2014, \u00a7 65) ve bu ba\u011flamda ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne de sahiptir (Murat Karayel (5), B. No: 2013\/6223, 7\/1\/2016, \u00a7 27). \u00d6te yandan ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn mutlak bir hak olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve Anayasa’n\u0131n 26. maddesinin ikinci maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen sebeplerle s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131r\u0131labilece\u011fi unutulmamal\u0131d\u0131r. Bu ba\u011flamda ceza infaz kurumunda bulunman\u0131n ka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131lmaz sonucu olarak su\u00e7un \u00f6nlenmesi ve disiplinin sa\u011flanmas\u0131 gibi kurumda g\u00fcvenli\u011fin ve d\u00fczenin korunmas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik kabul edilebilir gerekliliklerin olmas\u0131 durumunda mahpuslar\u0131n sahip oldu\u011fu haklara s\u0131n\u0131rlama getirilebilecektir (Murat Karayel (5), \u00a7 29).<\/p>\n
12. Anayasa Mahkemesi Diyadin Akdemir (B. No: 2015\/9562, 4\/4\/2018) karar\u0131nda tutuklu ve h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fclere g\u00f6nderilen fotokopi \u015feklindeki dok\u00fcmanlar\u0131n Anayasa Mahkemesince kabul edilen ilke ve kriterler \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda 13\/12\/2004 tarihli ve 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza ve G\u00fcvenlik Tedbirlerinin \u0130nfaz\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 3. ve 62. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca yap\u0131lacak denetime tabi tutulmas\u0131n\u0131n ceza infaz kurumu idareleri ve derece mahkemelerine makul olmayan bir y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fck getirilmesi anlam\u0131na gelece\u011fine karar vermi\u015ftir (Diyadin Akdemir, \u00a7 21). Ba\u015fka bir deyi\u015fle Anayasa Mahkemesine g\u00f6re fotokopi \u015feklindeki dok\u00fcmanlar\u0131n zorlay\u0131c\u0131 bir ihtiya\u00e7 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 m\u00fcddet\u00e7e, herhangi bir denetime tabi tutulmaks\u0131z\u0131n ceza infaz kurumuna al\u0131nmamas\u0131 kural olarak Anayasa’ya ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k olu\u015fturmaz (E\u015fref Arslan, B. No: 2014\/14655, 18\/7\/2018, \u00a7 46).<\/p>\n
13. Somut olayda ba\u015fvurucu, s\u00f6z konusu dok\u00fcman\u0131n kendisinin olu\u015fturdu\u011fu \u015fiirlerin bilgisayarda yaz\u0131lm\u0131\u015f h\u00e2li oldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Bununla birlikte ba\u015fvurucu, kendisi taraf\u0131ndan yaz\u0131lm\u0131\u015f \u015fiirlerin bilgisayarda yaz\u0131lm\u0131\u015f \u015fekillerine eri\u015fmesinin kendisi i\u00e7in zorlay\u0131c\u0131 bir ihtiya\u00e7 oldu\u011funu ortaya koymam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bunun yerine kendisi taraf\u0131ndan olu\u015fturuldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc dok\u00fcman\u0131n verilmemesinin hak ihlali olu\u015fturdu\u011funu belirtmekle yetinmi\u015ftir. H\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc ve tutuklulara g\u00f6nderilen fotokopi \u015feklindeki dok\u00fcmanlar\u0131n Anayasa Mahkemesince kabul edilen ilke ve kriterler \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda an\u0131lan h\u00fckme g\u00f6re yap\u0131lacak denetime tabi tutulmas\u0131n\u0131n beklenmesi, ceza infaz kurumu idareleri ve yarg\u0131 makamlar\u0131 \u00fczerine makul olmayan bir y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fck getirilmesi anlam\u0131na gelir. Sonu\u00e7 olarak ba\u015fvurucunun kendisine g\u00f6nderilen fotokopi niteli\u011findeki bilgisayar \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131s\u0131 dok\u00fcman\u0131n denetiminin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bahisle h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc olan ba\u015fvurucuya verilmemesi \u015feklindeki m\u00fcdahalenin ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc y\u00f6n\u00fcnden bir ihlal te\u015fkil etmedi\u011finin a\u00e7\u0131k oldu\u011fu de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
14. 30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun\u2019un 48. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun ba\u015fvurular\u0131n Anayasa Mahkemesince kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilebilece\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Bu ba\u011flamda ba\u015fvurucunun ihlal iddialar\u0131n\u0131 kan\u0131tlayamad\u0131\u011f\u0131, temel haklara y\u00f6nelik bir m\u00fcdahalenin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 veya m\u00fcdahalenin me\u015fru oldu\u011fu a\u00e7\u0131k olan ba\u015fvurular ile karma\u015f\u0131k veya zorlama \u015fik\u00e2yetlerden ibaret ba\u015fvurular a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun kabul edilebilir (Hikmet Balabano\u011flu, B. No: 2012\/1334, 17\/9\/2013, \u00a7 24).<\/p>\n
15. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne y\u00f6nelik bir ihlal olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurunun di\u011fer kabul edilebilirlik ko\u015fullar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden incelenmeksizin a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Adli yard\u0131m talebinin KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n
B. Ba\u015fvurunun a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
C. 12\/1\/2011 tarihli ve 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu’nun 339. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca tahsil edilmesi ma\u011fduriyetine neden olaca\u011f\u0131ndan adli yard\u0131m talebi kabul edilen ba\u015fvurucunun yarg\u0131lama giderlerini \u00f6demekten TAMAMEN MUAF TUTULMASINA 30\/10\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 30\/10\/2024 tarihli ve 2020\/17577 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 H\u00dcSEY\u0130N SARI BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/17577) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 30\/10\/2024 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM \u00a0 \u00a0 R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7 \u00a0 \u00a0 Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR Raport\u00f6r : Ayd\u0131n AYG\u00dcN Ba\u015fvurucu : H\u00fcseyin SARI \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcye kurum d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndan gelen bir dok\u00fcman\u0131n ceza infaz kurumu idaresince verilmemesi nedeniyle ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu, Akhisar T Tipi Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumunda devletin egemenli\u011fi alt\u0131nda bulunan topraklardan bir k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131 devlet idaresinden ay\u0131rmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmak su\u00e7undan h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc olarak bulunmaktad\u0131r. 3. Ba\u015fvurucuya ailesi taraf\u0131ndan posta yoluyla bilgisayar \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131s\u0131 bi\u00e7iminde bir dok\u00fcman g\u00f6nderilmi\u015ftir. Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumu E\u011fitim Kurulu Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131nca (E\u011fitim Kurulu) dok\u00fcman incelenmi\u015f; bilgisayar \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131s\u0131 niteli\u011finde ve yay\u0131nevi, yazar\u0131, bas\u0131m tarihi gibi s\u00fcreli s\u00fcresiz yay\u0131nlarda bulunmas\u0131 gereken bilgilerin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, kapa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 dolay\u0131s\u0131yla yay\u0131n kapsam\u0131na girmedi\u011fi gerek\u00e7eleriyle ba\u015fvuru konusu dok\u00fcman\u0131n ba\u015fvurucuya verilmeyerek Kurumda saklanmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir. 4. Ba\u015fvurucu, E\u011fitim Kurulu karar\u0131 sonras\u0131nda Akhisar \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine (H\u00e2kimlik) \u015fik\u00e2yet ba\u015fvurusunda bulunmu\u015ftur. H\u00e2kimlik, E\u011fitim Kurulu karar\u0131n\u0131n usul ve kanuna uygun oldu\u011funu belirterek \u015fik\u00e2yeti reddetmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, H\u00e2kimli\u011fin karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 itiraz kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur. \u0130tiraz\u0131 inceleyen Akhisar A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi, H\u00e2kimli\u011fin karar\u0131n\u0131n usul ve …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27,535],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-20210","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber","category-uncategorized-tr"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n