T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
T.K. BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/28269)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 17\/9\/2024<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
RESEN G\u0130ZL\u0130L\u0130K KARARI<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Selahaddin MENTE\u015e<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Muhterem \u0130NCE<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Mustafa Erdem ATLIHAN<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
T.K<\/p>\n
Yasal Temsilcisi<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
T.D.<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. G\u00fcl\u015fah TOKMAK<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, \u00e7ocu\u011fun cinsel istismar\u0131 su\u00e7unun i\u015flendi\u011fi iddias\u0131yla yap\u0131lan \u015fik\u00e2yet \u00fczerine ba\u015flat\u0131lan soru\u015fturma sonucu kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verilmesi nedeniyle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucunun yasal temsilcisi olan anne, ilk evlili\u011finden olma 9\/8\/2003 do\u011fumlu k\u0131z\u0131 T.K.n\u0131n 2014ile 2016 y\u0131llar\u0131 aras\u0131nda \u00fcvey dedesi S.D.nin cinsel istismar\u0131na u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrerek 31\/1\/2018 tarihinde Antalya Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) \u015fik\u00e2yette bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
3. Yasal temsilci olan anne; Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan ba\u015flat\u0131lan soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda al\u0131nan ifadesinde \u00f6nceki evlili\u011finden olma k\u0131z\u0131 T.K. ile birlikte \u015fik\u00e2yet tarihinden yakla\u015f\u0131k 1,5 y\u0131l \u00f6ncesine kadar ikinci evlili\u011fini yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 e\u015finin babas\u0131 olan S.D.nin evinde ya\u015fad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 ve daha sonra ta\u015f\u0131nd\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, T.K.n\u0131n \u015fik\u00e2yet tarihinden on be\u015f g\u00fcn kadar \u00f6nce kendisine anlatt\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6re kay\u0131n babas\u0131 S.D.nin ayn\u0131 evde ya\u015fad\u0131klar\u0131 s\u00fcre boyunca de\u011fi\u015fik tarihlerde T.K.ya cinsel temas i\u00e7eren eylemlerde bulundu\u011funu, “K\u0131z\u0131n\u0131n ne yap\u0131yorsun?” diye tepki vermesi \u00fczerine ise onu “Bak kimseye s\u00f6yleme rezil olursun, annen, baban bo\u015fanmak zorunda kal\u0131r.” \u015feklinde korkuttu\u011funu belirtmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn T.K.y\u0131 ma\u011fdur s\u0131fat\u0131yla beyan\u0131n\u0131n al\u0131nmas\u0131 i\u00e7in Antalya \u00c7ocuk \u0130zlem Merkezine (\u0130zleme Merkezi) sevk etmi\u015ftir. Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131, adli g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeci ve vekili e\u015fli\u011finde al\u0131nan ifadesinde T.K., \u00fcvey dedesi olan \u015f\u00fcphelinin ayn\u0131 evde ikamet ettikleri zaman zarf\u0131nda birden \u00e7ok kere v\u00fccudunu elledi\u011fini, bir seferinde de parma\u011f\u0131n\u0131 cinsel organ\u0131na soktu\u011funu, bilgisayar\u0131ndan ya da telefonundan a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 cinsel i\u00e7erikli videolar izletti\u011fini, ya\u015fan\u0131lan olaylar\u0131 kimseye anlatmamas\u0131 konusunda kendisini tehdit etti\u011fini; ya\u015fad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6z babas\u0131yla ayr\u0131l\u0131k ya\u015fayan annesini \u00fczmemek ve \u00fcvey dedesinin olanlar\u0131 birine s\u00f6ylerse annesinin bo\u015fanaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve sokakta kalacaklar\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6ylemesi \u00fczerine korktu\u011fu i\u00e7in kimseyle payla\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, olaylar\u0131 \u015fimdi anlatmas\u0131n\u0131n nedeninin ise benzer \u015feyler ya\u015fam\u0131\u015f olan bir arkada\u015f\u0131n\u0131n olanlar\u0131 ailesine anlatmas\u0131ndan ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 cesaret oldu\u011funu s\u00f6ylemi\u015ftir. T.K., \u00fcvey dedesinin bu eylemleri anne ve babas\u0131 evde yokken yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, dedesinin e\u015fi evdeyse e\u015fini kom\u015fuya g\u00f6nderdi\u011fini de ifade etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Hem\u015fire olan adli g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeci ayn\u0131 tarihli adli g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme de\u011ferlendirme raporunda; ba\u015fvurucunun anlama, kavrama ve ifade etme ile ilgili bir sorunu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, zihinsel geli\u015fiminin i\u00e7inde bulundu\u011fu d\u00f6nemle, anlat\u0131mlar\u0131n\u0131n da beden diliyle uyumlu oldu\u011funun g\u00f6zlemlendi\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n talebi \u00fczerine yine ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn Antalya E\u011fitim ve Ara\u015ft\u0131rma Hastanesince d\u00fczenlenen sa\u011fl\u0131k raporunda T.K.nin v\u00fccut muayenesinde herhangi bir cinsel ili\u015fki iz ve emaresi bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ancak T.K.nin \u00e7ocuk psikiyatrisi birimine sevkinin uygun olaca\u011f\u0131 tespitleri yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
7. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k talebi \u00fczerine al\u0131nan ve bir \u00e7ocuk psikiyatrisi uzman\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan 7\/2\/2018 tarihli raporda; yap\u0131lan testlerde sinirlilik, olayla ilgili d\u00fc\u015flemler, depresif belirtiler gibi travma sonras\u0131 stres bozuklu\u011fu ile uyumlu bulgular g\u00f6zlenen ve psikiyatrik tedavi \u00f6nerilen k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn cinsel istismar fiilinin hukuki anlam ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 alg\u0131layamad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ifadeleriyle psikolojik belirtilerin birbiriyle \u00f6rt\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve ifadelerine itibar edilebilece\u011fi t\u0131bbi kanaatine var\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. S.D.nin evinde yap\u0131lan aramada ele ge\u00e7irilen diz\u00fcst\u00fc bilgisayar, cep telefonu, \u00fc\u00e7 flash bellek ve bir hard disk \u00fczerinde yap\u0131lan inceleme sonucunda d\u00fczenlenen 23\/2\/2019 tarihli CD \u0130zleme ve \u00c7\u00f6z\u00fcmleme Tutana\u011f\u0131’na g\u00f6re bir\u00e7ok dok\u00fcman, yeti\u015fkinlere ait pornografik i\u00e7erikli bir\u00e7ok foto\u011fraf ve k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck bir k\u0131z \u00e7ocu\u011funun banyoda \u00e7\u0131plak h\u00e2lde \u00e7ekilmi\u015f d\u00f6rt foto\u011fraf\u0131 tespit edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu vekili, Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011fa verdi\u011fi 16\/7\/2019 tarihli dilek\u00e7ede bu d\u00f6rt foto\u011fraf\u0131n anne T.D.nin ikinci evlili\u011finden d\u00fcnyaya gelen ve dede S.D.nin \u00f6z torunu olan T.D.ye (cinsel istismar su\u00e7unun ma\u011fduru oldu\u011fu iddia edilen T.K.n\u0131n anne bir olan \u00fcvey karde\u015fi) ait oldu\u011funu beyan etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
9. \u015e\u00fcpheli S.D. Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 huzurunda ve m\u00fcdafii e\u015fli\u011finde al\u0131nan ifadesinde, o\u011flu ile ba\u015fvurucunun yasal temsilcisinin evlendikten sonra yanlar\u0131na ta\u015f\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve bir s\u00fcre ayn\u0131 evde birlikte ya\u015fad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, o\u011flunun ve ba\u015fvurucunun yasal temsilcisi olan gelininin \u00f6nceki bor\u00e7lar\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 s\u00fcrekli kendisinden para talep ettiklerini, sahibi oldu\u011fu bir tarlan\u0131n sat\u0131larak elde edilen paran\u0131n kendilerine vermesini istediklerini ancak bunu kabul etmedi\u011fi i\u00e7in ev i\u00e7inde s\u00fcrekli huzursuzluk \u00e7\u0131kard\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, bu nedenle e\u015fiyle (S.D.nin e\u015fi) T.K.n\u0131n kavga etti\u011fini, tarla sat\u0131lmay\u0131nca o\u011flu ile ailesinin evden ayr\u0131ld\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 ancak para istemeye devam ettiklerini, T.K.n\u0131n iftira atmas\u0131n\u0131n sebebinin bu olabilece\u011fini, nakliye i\u015fiyle u\u011fra\u015f\u0131p \u015fof\u00f6rl\u00fck yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in ay\u0131n yirmi be\u015f g\u00fcn\u00fc evde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, evindeki dijital materyallerde bulunan pornografik foto\u011fraflar\u0131n kendisiyle ilgisi olmay\u0131p foto\u011fraflar\u0131 bilgisayar\u0131 ortak kullanan o\u011fullar\u0131n\u0131n y\u00fcklemi\u015f olabilece\u011fini, k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck \u00e7ocu\u011fun banyo yaparken \u00e7ekilmi\u015f foto\u011fraflar\u0131n\u0131n ise -hat\u0131rlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kadar\u0131yla- an\u0131 olmas\u0131 i\u00e7in bizzat T.K. taraf\u0131ndan \u00e7ekildi\u011fini beyan etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
10. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k\u00e7a tan\u0131k olarak dinlenen \u00fcvey baba F.D. istismar olay\u0131na dair g\u00f6rg\u00fcye dayal\u0131 bilgisi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade etmi\u015ftir. Tan\u0131k olarak dinlenen S.D.nin e\u015fi Y.D. ise ifadesinde; T.K. ile ayn\u0131 evde kald\u0131klar\u0131 d\u00f6nemde T.K.n\u0131n bir defas\u0131nda kendisine “Bu borcu, yani annesinin borcunu \u00f6deyin, \u00f6demezseniz ben ya o\u011flunuza yani F…’ye ya da size iftira ataca\u011f\u0131m.” dedi\u011fini, arsalar\u0131n sat\u0131larak paras\u0131n\u0131 almak i\u00e7in b\u00f6yle bir yola ba\u015fvurduklar\u0131n\u0131, evdeki bilgisayar\u0131n \u00e7ocuklar\u0131ndan kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bilgisayardaki foto\u011fraflar\u0131n e\u015fine ait olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck \u00e7ocu\u011fun banyo foto\u011fraflar\u0131n\u0131 ise kendisi torununu y\u0131karken hat\u0131ra olsun diye karde\u015fi T.K.n\u0131n \u00e7ekti\u011fini s\u00f6ylemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
11. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, toplanan bilgi ve belgelerden m\u00fc\u015ftekinin soyut iddias\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda \u015f\u00fcphelinin y\u00fcklenen su\u00e7u i\u015fledi\u011fini g\u00f6sterir, dava a\u00e7maya yeterli olan kan\u0131t ve emare bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle 9\/12\/2019 tarihinde kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. Kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 karar\u0131na yap\u0131lan itiraz Antalya 5. Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fi taraf\u0131ndan 26\/4\/2020 tarihinde reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
12. Ba\u015fvurucu 28\/7\/2020 tarihinde nihai karar\u0131 \u00f6\u011frenmesinin ard\u0131ndan 26\/8\/2020 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
13. Di\u011fer taraftan ba\u015fvurucu, ba\u015fvurusu Anayasa Mahkemesi \u00f6n\u00fcnde derdest iken 5\/2\/2021 tarihli dilek\u00e7e ile s\u00f6z konusu karara kar\u015f\u0131 kanun yarar\u0131na bozma talebinde bulunmu\u015f; Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Ceza \u0130\u015fleri Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc 10\/12\/2021 tarihli yaz\u0131s\u0131 ile kanun yarar\u0131na bozma yoluna gidildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc bildirmi\u015ftir. Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 10\/1\/2022 tarihli kanun yarar\u0131na bozma talebi \u00fczerine Yarg\u0131tay 9. Ceza Dairesi 7\/6\/2022 tarihli karar\u0131 ile kanun yarar\u0131na bozma talebinin reddine karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
14. Komisyon, ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
15. Ba\u015fvurucu; ayn\u0131 evde ya\u015fad\u0131klar\u0131 \u00fcvey dedenin cinsel istismar\u0131na maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu olay nedeniyle ba\u015flat\u0131lan soru\u015fturman\u0131n etkili \u015fekilde y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmemesi sonucu \u00fcvey dede hakk\u0131nda ceza davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
16. Ba\u015fvuru, k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutu kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
17. Ba\u015fvurucu, ba\u015fvuru tarihi itibar\u0131yla re\u015fit de\u011fildir. Ba\u015fvurucunun sundu\u011fu ve bireysel ba\u015fvuru i\u00e7in \u00f6zel yetki i\u00e7eren vek\u00e2letname ise ba\u015fvurucunun annesinin veli s\u0131fat\u0131yla temsilen imza etmek suretiyle d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvuruya konu k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele iddias\u0131n\u0131n ma\u011fduru do\u011frudan ba\u015fvurucudur. Ba\u015fvurucunun annesinin s\u00f6z konusu iddia ba\u011flam\u0131nda ma\u011fdur s\u0131fat\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k oldu\u011fundan usule uygun vek\u00e2letname ile yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f bireysel ba\u015fvuruda ba\u015fvuru ehliyeti bak\u0131m\u0131ndan bir eksiklik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
18. Devletin ki\u015finin maddi ve manevi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 koruma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerinin usule ili\u015fkin y\u00f6n\u00fc -bireyin Anayasa’n\u0131n 17. maddesini ihlal eder bi\u00e7imde k\u00f6t\u00fc muameleye maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin savunulabilir bir iddias\u0131n\u0131n bulunmas\u0131 ko\u015fuluyla- her t\u00fcrl\u00fc fiziksel ve ruhsal sald\u0131r\u0131ya ili\u015fkin olaylardan sorumlu ki\u015filerin belirlenmesini ve gerekiyorsa bu ki\u015filerin cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flayabilecek etkili bir soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesini gerektirir. Y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclecek bu soru\u015fturman\u0131n temel amac\u0131 ki\u015finin maddi ve manevi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 koruyan mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin etkili bir \u015fekilde uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131 ve sorumlular\u0131n hesap vermelerini sa\u011flamakt\u0131r (Z.C. [GK], B. No: 2013\/3262, 11\/5\/2016, \u00a7\u00a7 88, 90).<\/p>\n
19. Ceza soru\u015fturmalar\u0131n\u0131n etkili bir \u015fekilde y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn kabul edilebilmesi i\u00e7in yetkili makamlar\u0131n olaydan haberdar olur olmaz resen harekete ge\u00e7mesi, soru\u015fturmadan sorumlu ve incelemeleri yapan ki\u015filerin olaylara kar\u0131\u015fan ki\u015filerden ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z olmas\u0131, olay\u0131 ayd\u0131nlatabilecek ve sorumlular\u0131n belirlenmesini sa\u011flayabilecek b\u00fct\u00fcn delillerin tespit edilmesi, soru\u015fturman\u0131n kamu denetimine a\u00e7\u0131k olmas\u0131 yan\u0131nda ma\u011fdurlar\u0131n me\u015fru menfaatlerini korumak i\u00e7in soru\u015fturmaya gerekli oldu\u011fu \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde etkili kat\u0131l\u0131mlar\u0131n\u0131n sa\u011flanmas\u0131 ve soru\u015fturmalar\u0131n makul bir \u00f6zen ve s\u00fcratle y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesi gerekir (Z.C, \u00a7\u00a7 92, 93).<\/p>\n
20. \u00c7ocuklar\u0131n kendilerini korumalar\u0131ndaki zorluk ve faillerin bu su\u00e7lar\u0131 b\u00fcy\u00fck engellerle kar\u015f\u0131la\u015fmadan i\u015fleyebilmeleri cinsel istismar\u0131n yeti\u015fkinlere nazaran \u00e7ocuklar i\u00e7in daha kolay i\u015flenmesine neden olmakta ve bu su\u00e7lar, \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n psikolojileri ile fizyolojilerinde yeti\u015fkinlere g\u00f6re daha a\u011f\u0131r etkiler b\u0131rakmaktad\u0131r. Bu ba\u011flamda s\u00f6z konusu su\u00e7lar\u0131n i\u015flenmesini \u00f6nleyici ve cayd\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 nitelikte tedbirlerin al\u0131nmas\u0131 devletin en \u00f6nemli pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerinden biridir. Zira Anayasa’da oldu\u011fu gibi \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n korunmas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik taraf\u0131 oldu\u011fumuz uluslararas\u0131 s\u00f6zle\u015fmeler ile t\u00fcm uluslararas\u0131 metinlerde de \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n cinsel istismar\u0131 ve cinsel s\u00f6m\u00fcr\u00fcs\u00fc hakk\u0131nda etkili ve cayd\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 cezalar d\u00fczenlenmesi de d\u00e2hil olmak \u00fczere devletlerin bu konuda gerekli tedbirleri almas\u0131na \u00f6zellikle vurgu yap\u0131lmaktad\u0131r (AYM, E.2015\/43, K.2015\/101, 12\/11\/2015, \u00a7 16).<\/p>\n
21. Yasal temsilci olan anne olaylar\u0131n ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihte on bir ya\u015f\u0131nda olan k\u0131z\u0131n\u0131n, \u00fcvey dedesinin cinsel istismar\u0131na u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 anlatmas\u0131 \u00fczerine Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011fa \u015fik\u00e2yet dilek\u00e7esi vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
22. Yasal temsilcinin \u015fik\u00e2yeti \u00fczerine Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k\u00e7a derh\u00e2l soru\u015fturma ba\u015flat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, ma\u011fdur k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn \u0130zleme Merkezinde bir adli g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeci arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla ifadesi al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f, k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn sa\u011fl\u0131k raporu ile bir \u00e7ocuk psikiyatr uzman\u0131n\u0131n haz\u0131rlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 rapor dosyaya kazand\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda yasal temsilcinin ve tan\u0131k g\u00f6sterdi\u011fi e\u015finin ifadeleri detayl\u0131 \u015fekilde dinlenmi\u015ftir. \u015eik\u00e2yet edilen S.D.nin savunma ve iddialar\u0131 kay\u0131t alt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f, S.D.nin dinlenilmesini istedi\u011fi e\u015fi Y.D.nin de tan\u0131kl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvurulmu\u015ftur. Tan\u0131klar, iddia edilen cinsel istismar olay\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak g\u00f6rg\u00fcye dayal\u0131 bir bilgileri olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade etmi\u015ftir. Olay\u0131n ayd\u0131nl\u0131\u011fa kavu\u015fturulabilmesi i\u00e7in \u015fik\u00e2yet edilenin evindeki dijital materyallere el konulmu\u015f, materyaller \u00fczerinde incelemeler yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
23. Tan\u0131k ifadelerinin al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan \u015f\u00fcpheli hakk\u0131nda ceza davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmamas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015f, kararda ma\u011fdur beyan\u0131n\u0131 do\u011frulayan delil bulunmamas\u0131 nedeniyle dava a\u00e7may\u0131 gerektiren yeterli \u015f\u00fcphenin olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
24. \u00d6ncelikle hem\u015fire olan adli g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeci taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanm\u0131\u015f olan adli g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme de\u011ferlendirme raporunda; ba\u015fvurucunun anlama, kavrama ve ifade etme ile ilgili herhangi bir sorununun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, zihinsel geli\u015fiminin i\u00e7inde bulundu\u011fu geli\u015fim d\u00f6nemi ile uyumlu oldu\u011funun ve anlat\u0131mlar\u0131n\u0131n beden dili ile uyumlu oldu\u011funun g\u00f6zlemlendi\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir (bkz., \u00a7 5). Bir \u00e7ocuk psikiyatrisi uzman\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanm\u0131\u015f olan 7\/2\/2018 tarihli raporda ise yap\u0131lan testlerde sinirlilik, olayla ilgili d\u00fc\u015flemler, depresif belirtiler gibi travma sonras\u0131 stres bozuklu\u011fu ile uyumlu bulgular g\u00f6zlenmi\u015f olan ve psikiyatrik tedavi \u00f6nerilen ba\u015fvurucunun cinsel istismar fiilinin hukuki anlam ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 alg\u0131layamad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ifadeleriyle psikolojik belirtilerin birbiriyle \u00f6rt\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve ifadelerine itibar edilebilece\u011fi t\u0131bbi kanaatine var\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir(bkz., \u00a7 7). Ancak soru\u015fturma dosyas\u0131na yans\u0131yan bu raporlarda \u00e7ocu\u011fun travmaya ba\u011fl\u0131 birtak\u0131m psikolojik rahats\u0131zl\u0131klar ge\u00e7irdi\u011fi ve ifadelerine itibar edilebilece\u011fi t\u0131bbi kanaatine var\u0131lm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu belirtilmesine ra\u011fmen s\u00f6z konusu raporlar\u0131n Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k karar\u0131nda tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n soru\u015fturmada delil olarak kabul edilmedi\u011fi g\u00f6zlemlenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
25. Yine somut olayda, soru\u015fturma s\u00fcrecinde S.D.nin evinde yap\u0131lan aramada ele ge\u00e7irilen diz\u00fcst\u00fc bilgisayar, cep telefonu, \u00fc\u00e7 flash bellek ve bir hard disk \u00fczerinde yap\u0131lan inceleme sonucunda d\u00fczenlenen 23\/2\/2019 tarihli CD \u0130zleme ve \u00c7\u00f6z\u00fcmleme Tutana\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6re dok\u00fcmanlar\u0131n ve dosyalar\u0131n i\u00e7inde yeti\u015fkinlere ait pornografik i\u00e7erikli bir\u00e7ok g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc ile k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck bir k\u0131z \u00e7ocu\u011funun banyoda \u00e7\u0131plak oldu\u011fu d\u00f6rt foto\u011fraf tespit edilmi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7 8).<\/p>\n
26. Tespiti yap\u0131lan bu pornografik i\u00e7erikli g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc ve foto\u011fraflara ili\u015fkin olarak Cumhuriyet Savc\u0131s\u0131 huzurunda verdi\u011fi ifadesinde S.D.nin, evindeki dijital materyallerde bulunan pornografik foto\u011fraflar\u0131n kendisiyle ilgisi olmay\u0131p foto\u011fraflar\u0131 bilgisayar\u0131 ortak kullanan o\u011fullar\u0131n\u0131n y\u00fcklemi\u015f olabilece\u011fini beyan etmi\u015f oldu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. \u00c7ocuk T.K., \u00fcvey dedesi S.D.nin, bilgisayar\u0131ndan ya da telefonundan a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 cinsel i\u00e7erikli videolar\u0131 kendisine izletti\u011fini iddia etmi\u015f olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen, ifadelerine ba\u015fvurulan di\u011fer tan\u0131klara ve yasal temsilciye bu hususta herhangi bir soru sorulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131; bu iddiaya ili\u015fkin g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc ve foto\u011fraf olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k\u00e7a herhangi bir ara\u015ft\u0131rma yap\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n ve bu konu kararda tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n s\u00f6z konusu hususlar\u0131n soru\u015fturmada delil olarak ele al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6zlemlenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
27. Bu a\u015famada belirtmek gerekir ki; 26\/9\/2004 tarihli ve 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu’nun “\u00c7ocuklar\u0131n Cinsel \u0130stismar\u0131” kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 103. Maddesi ile on be\u015f ya\u015f\u0131n\u0131 tamamlamam\u0131\u015f veya tamamlam\u0131\u015f olmakla birlikte fiilin hukuki anlam ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 alg\u0131lama yetene\u011fi geli\u015fmemi\u015f olan \u00e7ocuklara kar\u015f\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen her t\u00fcrl\u00fc cinsel davran\u0131\u015f\u0131n cinsel istismar oldu\u011fu a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. Bu halde Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k\u00e7a S.D. taraf\u0131ndan k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fc\u011fe pornografik foto\u011fraflar\u0131n\/videolar\u0131n izletilmi\u015f oldu\u011fu iddias\u0131n\u0131n \u00fczerinde hi\u00e7 durulmaks\u0131z\u0131n sonuca gidilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 da soru\u015fturman\u0131n etkinli\u011finin sa\u011flanmas\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan bir eksiklik olarak g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
28. \u00c7ocu\u011fun cinsel istismar\u0131 iddias\u0131n\u0131n hassasiyetle ele al\u0131narak \u00e7ocuk odakl\u0131 soru\u015fturma ve\/veya kovu\u015fturma yap\u0131lmas\u0131 etkili soru\u015fturma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn bir par\u00e7as\u0131d\u0131r. \u00c7ocu\u011fun \u00fcst\u00fcn menfaati g\u00f6zetilerek tespit edilen olgular\u0131n delillerle uyumlu \u015fekilde yorumlanarak bir sonuca ula\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 devletin \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 koruma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn tart\u0131\u015fmas\u0131z bir ba\u015fka unsurudur.<\/p>\n
29. Farkl\u0131 ifadeyle bir taraftan yasal d\u00fczenlemelerle \u00e7ocuklar aleyhine i\u015flenen cinsel su\u00e7lar\u0131n daha a\u011f\u0131r yapt\u0131r\u0131mlarla cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclerek bu su\u00e7lar\u0131n cayd\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n art\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 hedeflenirken di\u011fer taraftan bu su\u00e7larla ilgili yap\u0131lan \u015fik\u00e2yet veya ihbarlar\u0131n \u00f6zensiz bi\u00e7imde soru\u015fturmas\u0131 hedeflenen cayd\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 zedeleyecek mahiyettedir. Devletin pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckleri kapsam\u0131nda, ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi iddia edilen \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n istismarlar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik eylemlere ili\u015fkin soru\u015fturmalar\u0131n ancak ciddiyetle ve detayl\u0131 yap\u0131lmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n korunmas\u0131ndan tam anlam\u0131yla s\u00f6z edilebilecektir (S.B. ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2016\/59765 17\/6\/2020, \u00a7 44).<\/p>\n
30. Elbette soru\u015fturma s\u00fcrecinin sonunda, eksiksiz toplanan deliller analiz edilirken de\u011ferlendirmeye esas al\u0131namayacak olan ilgisiz hususlar ihmal edilerek bir sonuca ula\u015f\u0131labilir. Anayasa Mahkemesinin yarg\u0131 makamlar\u0131n\u0131n delil de\u011ferlendirmesine ve hukuki yorumlar\u0131na m\u00fcdahale etmesi kural olarak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclemez ise de delillerin analizi sonucu ula\u015f\u0131lan sonu\u00e7lar Anayasa’da g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan temel haklar\u0131 -somut olayda k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131- i\u015flevsiz h\u00e2le getirecek mahiyette olmamal\u0131d\u0131r (baz\u0131 de\u011fi\u015fikliklerle birlikte bkz. S.B. ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 45).<\/p>\n
31. Somut olayda ma\u011fdur \u00e7ocu\u011fun ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 beyan\u0131 ile bu beyan\u0131 destekleyen sa\u011fl\u0131k raporlar\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvurucunun iddias\u0131n\u0131 savunulabilir k\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ortadad\u0131r. Bu itibarla \u00e7ocu\u011fun cinsel istismar\u0131 gibi a\u011f\u0131r nitelikteki bir su\u00e7a ili\u015fkin yap\u0131lan \u015fik\u00e2yeti destekleyen makul delillerin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 da dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda s\u00f6z konusu delillerin tart\u0131\u015f\u0131larak bir sonuca ula\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131, aksi kanaate var\u0131lm\u0131\u015fsa nedenlerinin ve bu nedenleri destekleyen delillerin teredd\u00fct yaratmayacak \u015fekilde izah edilmesi gerekti\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r.<\/p>\n
32. Yukar\u0131daki tespitler \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclecek adli s\u00fcrecin mutlaka bir dava a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 ya da a\u00e7\u0131lan davan\u0131n belli bir h\u00fck\u00fcmle sonu\u00e7lanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi anlam\u0131na gelmemekle birlikte ba\u015fvuru konusu olayda Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturman\u0131n etkili olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
33. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda devletin usul y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M<\/p>\n
34. Ba\u015fvurucu, ihlalin tespiti ve yeniden soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmas\u0131 talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
35. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamda karar\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi soru\u015fturma mercilerince yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden soru\u015fturma i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flatmak ve Anayasa Mahkemesini ihlal sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131ran nedenleri gideren, ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere uygun yeni bir karar vermektir (Mehmet Do\u011fan [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Ba\u015fvurunun niteli\u011fi gere\u011fi kamuya a\u00e7\u0131k belgelerde ba\u015fvurucunun ve temsilcisinin kimli\u011finin RESEN G\u0130ZL\u0130 TUTULMASINA,<\/p>\n
B. K\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
C. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutunun \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutunun ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere Antalya Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Sor. No: 2018\/9502) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. 446,90 TL har\u00e7 ve 18.800 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinden olu\u015fan toplam 19.246,90 TL yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvurucuya \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
F. \u00d6demenin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
G. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 17\/9\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 17\/9\/2024 tarihli ve 2020\/28269 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 T.K. BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/28269) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 17\/9\/2024 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 RESEN G\u0130ZL\u0130L\u0130K KARARI \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ \u00a0 \u00a0 Selahaddin MENTE\u015e \u00a0 \u00a0 Muhterem \u0130NCE \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : Mustafa Erdem ATLIHAN Ba\u015fvurucu : T.K Yasal Temsilcisi : T.D. Vekili : Av. G\u00fcl\u015fah TOKMAK \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, \u00e7ocu\u011fun cinsel istismar\u0131 su\u00e7unun i\u015flendi\u011fi iddias\u0131yla yap\u0131lan \u015fik\u00e2yet \u00fczerine ba\u015flat\u0131lan soru\u015fturma sonucu kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verilmesi nedeniyle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucunun yasal temsilcisi olan anne, ilk evlili\u011finden olma 9\/8\/2003 do\u011fumlu k\u0131z\u0131 T.K.n\u0131n 2014ile 2016 y\u0131llar\u0131 aras\u0131nda \u00fcvey dedesi S.D.nin cinsel istismar\u0131na u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrerek 31\/1\/2018 tarihinde Antalya Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) \u015fik\u00e2yette bulunmu\u015ftur. 3. Yasal temsilci olan anne; Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan ba\u015flat\u0131lan soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda al\u0131nan ifadesinde \u00f6nceki evlili\u011finden olma k\u0131z\u0131 T.K. ile birlikte \u015fik\u00e2yet tarihinden yakla\u015f\u0131k 1,5 y\u0131l \u00f6ncesine kadar ikinci evlili\u011fini yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 e\u015finin babas\u0131 olan S.D.nin evinde ya\u015fad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 ve daha sonra ta\u015f\u0131nd\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, T.K.n\u0131n \u015fik\u00e2yet tarihinden on be\u015f g\u00fcn kadar \u00f6nce kendisine anlatt\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6re kay\u0131n babas\u0131 S.D.nin ayn\u0131 evde ya\u015fad\u0131klar\u0131 s\u00fcre boyunca de\u011fi\u015fik tarihlerde T.K.ya cinsel temas i\u00e7eren eylemlerde bulundu\u011funu, “K\u0131z\u0131n\u0131n ne …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27,535],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-20135","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber","category-uncategorized-tr"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n