T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
O\u011eULCAN Y\u0130\u011e\u0130T \u00d6ZDEM\u0130R BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/16726)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 17\/9\/2024<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Selahaddin MENTE\u015e<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Muhterem \u0130NCE<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Mustafa Erdem ATLIHAN<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
O\u011fulcan Yi\u011fit \u00d6ZDEM\u0130R<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. T\u00fcrkan \u00d6ZDEM\u0130R<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nma s\u00fcrecinde fiziksel ve psikolojik \u015fiddete u\u011franmas\u0131 ve bu hususta yap\u0131lan soru\u015fturman\u0131n etkisiz olmas\u0131 nedeniyle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Bireysel ba\u015fvuru formunda, ba\u015fvurucu, kamuoyunda Gezi Park\u0131 olaylar\u0131 olarak bilinen s\u00fcre\u00e7te Taksim Meydan\u0131’ndaki protesto eylemlerine kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclerek kolluk g\u00f6revlileri taraf\u0131ndan yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade etmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu olaylarla bir ilgisi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, eylemlere kat\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 savunmaktad\u0131r. Olay anlat\u0131m\u0131 yapmayan ba\u015fvurucu g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131n\u0131rken sa\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7ekildi\u011fini, tekmelendi\u011fini, tehdit ve hakarete u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131ktan sonra ise ellerinin arkadan kelep\u00e7elenerek polis otob\u00fcs\u00fcnde \u00f6\u011fle saatinden gece yar\u0131s\u0131na kadar bekletildi\u011fini, otob\u00fcste beklerken ara\u00e7 i\u00e7inde patlayan biber gaz\u0131na maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc nezarethanede ise temel ihtiya\u00e7lar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lanmaks\u0131z\u0131n bir g\u00fcnden fazla s\u00fcreyle haks\u0131z yere tutuldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
3. Kolluk g\u00f6revlileri olay hakk\u0131nda ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn saat 00.00’da bir tutanak tutmu\u015ftur. Bu tutana\u011fa g\u00f6re31\/5\/2013 g\u00fcn\u00fc Taksim Gezi Park\u0131’nda toplan\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 bilgisi elde edilmi\u015f, kolluk g\u00f6revlilerince gerekli emniyet tedbirleri uygulamaya konulmu\u015ftur. Saat 12.00 itibar\u0131yla grubun say\u0131s\u0131 1.000’e ula\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. S\u00f6z konusu grup bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131n\u0131 saat 13.00 itibar\u0131yla bitirip oturma eylemine ge\u00e7mi\u015ftir. Herkesin duyabilece\u011fi \u015fekilde da\u011f\u0131lmalar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde uyar\u0131lan grup, oturma eylemini s\u00fcrd\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc i\u00e7in diren\u00e7lerini k\u0131racak \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde ve kademeli olarak artan nispette zor kullan\u0131larak da\u011f\u0131t\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Gruptan kopan eylemciler, g\u00fcn boyunca k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck gruplar h\u00e2linde \u0130stiklal Caddesi ve \u00e7evresindeki farkl\u0131 noktalarda eylemlerini s\u00fcrd\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015f ve polisin m\u00fcdahalesiyle kar\u015f\u0131la\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu olaylar s\u0131ras\u0131nda Taksim civar\u0131na da\u011f\u0131lan ve ba\u015fvurucunun da aralar\u0131nda bulundu\u011fu toplam 80 \u015fah\u0131s kovalamaca sonucu yakalanm\u0131\u015f ve adli i\u015flemlerin yap\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in \u0130stanbul Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc Vatan Hizmet Binas\u0131 G\u00fcvenlik \u015eube M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne getirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. Ulusal Yarg\u0131 A\u011f\u0131 Bili\u015fim Sistemi (UYAP) arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla eri\u015filen bilgi ve belgelere g\u00f6re, ba\u015fvurucuyla beraber toplam 74 ki\u015fi hakk\u0131nda g\u00f6revi yapt\u0131rmamak i\u00e7in direnme, 6\/10\/1983 tarihli ve 2911 say\u0131l\u0131 Toplant\u0131 ve G\u00f6steri Y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015fleri Kanunu’na ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7lar\u0131 nedeniyle 2013\/79585 numaral\u0131 dosya \u00fczerinde soru\u015fturma ba\u015flat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda ifadesi al\u0131nan \u015f\u00fcphelilerin kolluk g\u00f6revlilerinin fiziksel \u015fiddetine u\u011frad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 beyan etmeleri \u00fczerine Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, kimli\u011fi belirlenemeyen kolluk g\u00f6revlileri hakk\u0131nda g\u00f6revi k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanma su\u00e7u nedeniyle resen ba\u015flat\u0131lan soru\u015fturman\u0131n bu dosyadan tefrikine ve 2013\/84113 soru\u015fturma numaras\u0131na kaydedilmesine, 13\/6\/2013 tarihli karar\u0131 ile de 2013\/84113 soru\u015fturma numaral\u0131 dosyan\u0131n ayn\u0131 konuda farkl\u0131 ki\u015filerin \u015fik\u00e2yeti \u00fczerine ba\u015flat\u0131lan ve soru\u015fturma i\u015flemlerine devam edilen 2013\/79334 soru\u015fturma numaral\u0131 dosya ile birle\u015ftirilmesine karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucunun 2013\/79585 numaral\u0131 soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda ve m\u00fcdafi e\u015fli\u011finde 1\/6\/2013 tarihinde saat 00.45’te \u015f\u00fcpheli olarak ifadesi al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu “..31\/5\/2013 g\u00fcn\u00fc saat 16.00 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda Beyo\u011flu Galatasaray Lisesine yak\u0131n ara sokakta y\u00fcr\u00fcrken birden gaz bombas\u0131 geldi bende ka\u00e7maya ba\u015flad\u0131m, ka\u00e7arken \u00e7ukura d\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcm ve o s\u0131rada beni \u00e7evik kuvvet polisleri g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131m, ben bana at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7lamalar\u0131 kabul etmiyorum g\u00f6revli memurlara mukavemette bulunmad\u0131m ve sald\u0131r\u0131 olaylar\u0131na kar\u0131\u015fmad\u0131m” \u015feklinde beyanda bulunmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fvurucu ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 huzurunda yine m\u00fcdafi e\u015fli\u011finde verdi\u011fi ifadesinde ise “Emniyet ifademi tekrar ederim. Taksim’e gezmek i\u00e7in gitmi\u015ftim. Su\u00e7lamalar\u0131 kabul etmiyorum.” demi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. Soru\u015fturma dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7inde bulunan ve olay tarihini ta\u015f\u0131yan tutanaklardan ba\u015fvurucunun avukat ile g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesinin ve yak\u0131nlar\u0131na haber verme imk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131n sa\u011fland\u0131\u011f\u0131, ba\u015fvurucunun yak\u0131nlar\u0131na haber vermek istemedi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
7. Ba\u015fvurucu ve beraberindeki 73 ki\u015fi hakk\u0131nda g\u00f6revi yapt\u0131rmamak i\u00e7in direnme ve 2911 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’a ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7lar\u0131 nedeniyle y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturma neticesinde Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k 10\/1\/2014 tarihli kararla ve \u015f\u00fcphelilerin 2911 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’a muhalefet ettiklerine ili\u015fkin soyut iddia d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda delil elde edilemedi\u011fi ve olay yerinde bulunmak d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda direnme, zarar verme ve yaralama benzeri eylemlere kat\u0131ld\u0131klar\u0131na ili\u015fkin herhangi bir delil bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle kovu\u015fturma yap\u0131lmas\u0131na yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. Ba\u015fvurucu, bireysel ba\u015fvuru formunda onu g\u00f6zalt\u0131na alan ve nezarethanede g\u00f6rev yapan g\u00f6revli memur ve amirler hakk\u0131nda su\u00e7 duyurusunda bulundu\u011funu iddia etmi\u015f ancak su\u00e7 duyurusu dilek\u00e7esini Anayasa Mahkemesine sunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. UYAP arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla eri\u015filen soru\u015fturma dosyas\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesi neticesinde de bu ve bu soru\u015fturma dosyas\u0131 ile birle\u015ftirilmesine karar verilen di\u011fer soru\u015fturma dosyalar\u0131nda \u00e7e\u015fitli ki\u015fi ve sivil toplum \u00f6rg\u00fctlerince sunulan 189 \u015fik\u00e2yet ve su\u00e7 duyurusu dilek\u00e7esi oldu\u011fu ancak ba\u015fvurucunun sunmu\u015f oldu\u011fu bir \u015fik\u00e2yet dilek\u00e7esinin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda;<\/p>\n
– 31\/5\/2013 g\u00fcn\u00fc saat 20.42’de Haseki E\u011fitim ve Ara\u015ft\u0131rma Hastanesinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen muayenesi sonucu d\u00fczenlenen genel adli muayene raporunda “Olay\u0131n \u00f6yk\u00fcs\u00fc: Darp ve cebir.” kayd\u0131 ile tam olarak okunamamakla birlikte; “Muayene bulgular\u0131: sol \u00f6n kol \u00fczerinde …cmlik abrazyon izi, sa\u011f \u00f6n kol \u00fczerinde k\u0131zar\u0131kl\u0131k lineer ve …. kelep\u00e7e izi g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc.” tespitine,<\/p>\n
– \u0130stanbul Adli T\u0131p \u015eube M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnce liste \u015feklinde haz\u0131rlanan 4\/6\/2013 tarihli raporda ise “…do\u011fumlu ki\u015fiye ayn\u0131 hastanenin 9778944 say\u0131l\u0131 raporunda; sa\u011f \u00f6n kolda \u00e7izik ve s\u0131yr\u0131klar, bel sa\u011fda kal\u00e7a orta hat \u00fczerinde morluk ve sol dirsekte k\u0131zar\u0131kl\u0131k, sol \u00f6n kolda s\u0131yr\u0131klar oldu\u011fu, Ar\u0131zas\u0131n\u0131n: Ki\u015finin ya\u015fam\u0131n\u0131 tehlikeye sokmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, basit t\u0131bbi m\u00fcdahale giderilebilecek \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde hafif oldu\u011fu…” tespitine yer verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
10. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, olaylara ili\u015fkin olarak ev ve i\u015fyerlerindeki g\u00fcvenlik kameralar\u0131n\u0131n, bas\u0131n ve yay\u0131n kurum ve kurulu\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n elindeki g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcler ile kamera kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n, MOBESE kay\u0131tlar\u0131 ve polis ara\u00e7lar\u0131ndaki g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n toplanmas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik bir\u00e7ok yaz\u0131\u015fma yapm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Toplumsal olaylar s\u0131ras\u0131nda baz\u0131 MOBESE kameralar\u0131n\u0131n zarar g\u00f6rmesi nedeniyle kamera kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n bir k\u0131sm\u0131na ula\u015f\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, baz\u0131 i\u015fyerlerinden ve ulusal bas\u0131n ve yay\u0131n organlar\u0131ndan elde edilen y\u00fckl\u00fc miktardaki g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcn\u00fcn \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmlenmesi i\u00e7in uzun s\u00fcre bilirki\u015fi heyeti olu\u015fturulmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na, soru\u015fturma dosyas\u0131nda bir k\u0131s\u0131m m\u00fc\u015fteki i\u00e7in \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmlenebilen g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerden kollu\u011fun m\u00fcdahalesine ili\u015fkin tespit yap\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin raporlar dosyaya girmi\u015f ise de ba\u015fvurucuyla ilgili bir foto\u011fraf, kamera kayd\u0131, g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmleme raporu ya da bilirki\u015fi raporunun soru\u015fturma dosyas\u0131nda bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
11. Olay nedeniyle g\u00f6revi k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanma ve zor kullama yetkisine ili\u015fkin s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n a\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 su\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n i\u015flendi\u011finden bahisle y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen ve \u015f\u00fcphelisi \u0130stanbul Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kadrosundaki ilgili kolluk g\u00f6revlileri olarak g\u00f6sterilen soru\u015fturmada Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, Gezi olaylar\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131ndaki genel \u015fiddet hareketlerine dikkat \u00e7ekmi\u015f, yayg\u0131n \u015fekilde bozulan kamu d\u00fczeninin yeniden tesisi i\u00e7in kolluk g\u00f6revlilerince al\u0131nan s\u0131k\u0131 tedbirlerin ka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131lmaz ve makul oldu\u011fu yorumunu yapm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, eylemlerin \u015fiddete d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fc bu genel karga\u015fa ortam\u0131nda olay yerinde bulunma sebepleri bar\u0131\u015f\u00e7\u0131l olan kimselerin de kolluk g\u00f6revlilerinin m\u00fcdahalesinden etkilendi\u011fini ifade etmi\u015f; aralar\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun da oldu\u011fu m\u00fc\u015ftekilerin yaralanmalar\u0131n\u0131n niteli\u011fine i\u015faret ederek eylemin da\u011f\u0131t\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yap\u0131lan uygulamada kullan\u0131lan g\u00fcc\u00fcn orant\u0131l\u0131 oldu\u011fu ve polis memurlar\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fc\u015ftekilere y\u00f6nelik zor kullanma yetkisinin s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n\u0131 a\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak soru\u015fturmaya devam edilmesi ve kamu davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeterli \u015f\u00fcphe olu\u015fturacak delil elde edilmedi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle 16\/4\/2019 tarihinde kovu\u015fturma yap\u0131lmas\u0131na yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
12. Ba\u015fvurucu, Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k karar\u0131na 28\/5\/2019 tarihli dilek\u00e7e ile itiraz etmi\u015f, ba\u015fvurucunun itiraz\u0131 \u0130stanbul 3. Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011finin 28\/1\/2020 tarihli karar\u0131yla reddedilmi\u015ftir. Ret karar\u0131 ba\u015fvurucuya 4\/3\/2020 tarihinde tebli\u011f edilmi\u015f olup ba\u015fvurucu 31\/3\/2020 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
13. \u00d6deme g\u00fcc\u00fcnden yoksun oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurucunun adli yard\u0131m talebinin kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
A. K\u00f6t\u00fc Muamele Yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
14. Ba\u015fvurucu; olaylara kar\u0131\u015fmamas\u0131na ra\u011fmen eylemci oldu\u011fu zann\u0131yla kolluk g\u00f6revlilerince yakalanarak g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u0131rada s\u00f6zl\u00fc ve fiziksel sald\u0131r\u0131ya maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, gerekmedi\u011fi h\u00e2lde elleri arkadan kelep\u00e7eli olarak yakla\u015f\u0131k yar\u0131m g\u00fcn polis arac\u0131nda bekletildi\u011fini, bu nedenle bileklerinde s\u0131yr\u0131k ve yaralanmalar meydana geldi\u011fini, bekledi\u011fi s\u0131rada biber gaz\u0131na maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve olay hakk\u0131nda etkili bir soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmedi\u011fini ifade ederek k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ve etkili ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde konuya ili\u015fkin insan haklar\u0131 yarg\u0131s\u0131 i\u00e7tihad\u0131 sunulmu\u015f, adli makamlar\u0131n tespitinden ve ula\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonu\u00e7tan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren bir neden bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bildirilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 cevab\u0131nda bireysel ba\u015fvuru formundaki iddialar\u0131n\u0131 tekrar etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
15. Ba\u015fvuru, k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
16. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
17. \u0130nsan onurunun korunmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin ilk f\u0131kras\u0131nda maddi ve manevi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n korunmas\u0131 ve geli\u015ftirilmesi hakk\u0131 g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f; ayn\u0131 maddenin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131yla da ki\u015filere i\u015fkence ve eziyet yap\u0131lmas\u0131, ki\u015filerin insan haysiyetiyle ba\u011fda\u015fmayan bir cezaya veya muameleye tabi tutulmas\u0131 yasaklanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu yasak i\u00e7in herhangi bir istisnan\u0131n kabul edilmemesi ve Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 15. maddesinde sava\u015f, seferberlik veya ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc h\u00e2llerde de maddi ve manevi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne dokunulamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ifade edilmesi, yasa\u011f\u0131n mutlak niteli\u011fini ortaya koymaktad\u0131r. Bununla birlikte yasak, t\u00fcm k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele durumlar\u0131n\u0131 kapsamaz. Bir muamelenin Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n kapsam\u0131na girebilmesi, asgari bir a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131k derecesine (ciddiyet seviyesine) ula\u015fmas\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r. Asgari a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131k derecesine ula\u015f\u0131l\u0131p ula\u015f\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, g\u00f6recelidir ve somut olay\u0131n ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesiyle belirlenir. Yap\u0131lacak de\u011ferlendirmede muamelenin s\u00fcresi, fiziksel ve ruhsal etkileri ile ma\u011fdurun cinsiyeti, ya\u015f\u0131 ve sa\u011fl\u0131k durumu gibi etkenler \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131r. Bu etkenlere ard\u0131ndaki kas\u0131t veya saik ile birlikte muamelenin amac\u0131 da eklenebilir. Ayr\u0131ca gerilimin ve duygular\u0131n y\u00fckseldi\u011fi atmosfer gibi muamelenin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ba\u011flam da dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gereken di\u011fer bir etkendir (Cezmi Demir ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2013\/293, 17\/7\/2014, \u00a7\u00a7 80, 83; Ali R\u0131za \u00d6zer ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2013\/3924, 6\/1\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 72, 74, 75).<\/p>\n
18. G\u00fc\u00e7 kullanmaya yetkili kamu g\u00f6revlilerinin, tutumu nedeniyle kendisine kar\u015f\u0131 g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 kesin olarak gerekli olmayan bir ki\u015fiye kar\u015f\u0131 fiziksel g\u00fcce ba\u015fvurmalar\u0131, ki\u015fi \u00fczerindeki etkisi ne olursa olsun ilke olarak Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131 ihlal ihlal eder. Kesin gerekli oldu\u011fu h\u00e2llerde de g\u00fc\u00e7, a\u015f\u0131r\u0131ya ka\u00e7madan kullan\u0131lmal\u0131 ve ki\u015finin tutumuyla orant\u0131l\u0131 olmal\u0131d\u0131r (Ali R\u0131za \u00d6zer ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 81).<\/p>\n
19. G\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131m\u0131na ili\u015fkin bu ilkeler, g\u00fc\u00e7 kullanmaya yetkili kamu g\u00f6revlilerinin hukuka uygun olarak verdikleri emre kar\u015f\u0131 etkin (aktif) veya edilgin (pasif) direni\u015f g\u00f6sterilmesi h\u00e2linde de ge\u00e7erlidir (baz\u0131 de\u011fi\u015fikliklerle birlikte bkz. Arif Haldun Soyg\u00fcr, B. No: 2013\/2659, 15\/10\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 51, 52).<\/p>\n
20. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131yla yasaklanan muamelelerin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin iddialar, uygun delillerle desteklenmelidir. Bu delillerin de\u011ferlendirilmesinde ise s\u00f6z\u00fc edilen delillerin iddiay\u0131 makul \u015f\u00fcphenin \u00f6tesinde ispat edip etmedi\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmelidir. Bununla birlikte yeterince ciddi, a\u00e7\u0131k ve tutarl\u0131 emareler ya da aksi ispat edilemeyen birtak\u0131m karineler de iddian\u0131n ispat\u0131 i\u00e7in yeterli kan\u0131t te\u015fkil edebilir (baz\u0131 de\u011fi\u015fikliklerle birlikte bkz. Cezmi Demir ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 95; Ali R\u0131za \u00d6zer ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 83).<\/p>\n
21. Ki\u015finin g\u00f6zalt\u0131 veya tutukluluk gibi devletin kontrol\u00fc alt\u0131nda bulundu\u011fu s\u0131rada yaralanmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde yetkili makamlar, bu olaya ili\u015fkin tatmin edici ve inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 bir a\u00e7\u0131klama getirmekle y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcd\u00fcr (S.D., B. No: 2013\/3017, 16\/12\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 89, 90; Cengiz Kahraman ve Kenan \u00d6zy\u00fcrek, B. No: 2013\/8137, 20\/4\/2016, \u00a7 95) zira bu t\u00fcr olaylar\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fme ko\u015fullar\u0131na ili\u015fkin bilgiler \u00e7o\u011funlukla yetkili makamlar\u0131n eri\u015fimindedir (Ferit Kurt ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2018\/9957, 8\/6\/2021, \u00a7 74).<\/p>\n
22. Hukuka uygun olarak tutulan bir ki\u015fiye ka\u00e7mas\u0131n\u0131n ya da kendisine veya ba\u015fkas\u0131na zarar vermesinin \u00f6nlenmesi amac\u0131yla kelep\u00e7e tak\u0131lmas\u0131 yahut bu ki\u015fide ayn\u0131 ama\u00e7larla hareketi k\u0131s\u0131tlay\u0131c\u0131 ba\u015fka ara\u00e7lar\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131, makul \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde gerekli olan\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6tesinde bir g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131m\u0131 veya ki\u015finin kelep\u00e7eli h\u00e2linin kamuya te\u015fhir edilmesi amac\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcrece-kural olarak- Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden sorun olu\u015fturmamaktad\u0131r. Tutman\u0131n haks\u0131z oldu\u011funun sonradan anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 da sonucu de\u011fi\u015ftirmemektedir. Bununla birlikte s\u00f6z\u00fc edilen zorlay\u0131c\u0131 tedbire ba\u015fvurulmas\u0131, kendisine kelep\u00e7e tak\u0131lan ki\u015finin fiziksel veya ruhsal durumu ve\/veya tedbirin ki\u015fideki fiziksel yahut ruhsal etkileri nedeniyle asgari a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131k e\u015fi\u011fine ula\u015fabilir (baz\u0131 de\u011fi\u015fikliklerle birlikte bkz. Kazim Aksoy (2), B. No: 2015\/8409, 4\/7\/2019, \u00a7 38; \u00d6.U., B. No: 2016\/62587, 23\/6\/2020, \u00a7\u00a7 32, 33, 35). Bir ki\u015finin ellerinin \u00f6n\u00fcnde veya arkas\u0131nda kelep\u00e7elenmesi bedensel hareketlerinin k\u0131s\u0131tlanmas\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan b\u00fcy\u00fck fark olu\u015fturmamakla birlikte ellerinin arkas\u0131na al\u0131narak kelep\u00e7e kullan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n da tek ba\u015f\u0131na ki\u015finin onurunu zedeleyecek mahiyette oldu\u011fu de\u011ferlendirilemez (bkz. Murat K\u00f6se, B. No: 2017\/37375, 13\/10\/2020, \u00a7 34).<\/p>\n
23. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesi; \u201cDevletin temel ama\u00e7 ve g\u00f6revleri\u201d kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 5. maddedeki genel y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckle birlikte yorumland\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, bireyin bir devlet g\u00f6revlisinin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 ve Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131 ihlal eden bir muamelesine u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin savunulabilir iddias\u0131 hakk\u0131nda etkili bir soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesini gerektirir. K\u00f6t\u00fc muamelenin kasten yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ileri s\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc durumlarda iddia hakk\u0131nda ivedilikle bir ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 ba\u015flat\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. \u015eik\u00e2yet olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131nda bile ki\u015fiye k\u00f6t\u00fc muamelede bulunuldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin yeterince a\u00e7\u0131k belirtiler varsa konuyla ilgili bir ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. Ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131n\u0131n Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin gerektirdi\u011fi \u015fekilde etkili oldu\u011funun kabul edilebilmesi i\u00e7in soru\u015fturmay\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fcten ki\u015filer olaya kar\u0131\u015fan ki\u015filerden ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z olmal\u0131, soru\u015fturmada olay\u0131 ayd\u0131nlatabilecek ve sorumlular\u0131n belirlenmesini sa\u011flayabilecek t\u00fcm deliller toplanmal\u0131d\u0131r. Dahas\u0131 soru\u015fturma s\u00fcreci gerekti\u011fi \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde kamu denetimine a\u00e7\u0131k olmal\u0131, ma\u011fdur soru\u015fturmaya etkili \u015fekilde kat\u0131labilmeli ve soru\u015fturmada makul bir \u00f6zen ve s\u00fcratle hareket edilmelidir. Yetkililer, soru\u015fturmay\u0131 sonland\u0131rmak i\u00e7in aceleci davranmamal\u0131 ve temelden yoksun sonu\u00e7lara dayanmamal\u0131d\u0131r (Tahir Canan, B. No: 2012\/969, 18\/9\/2013, \u00a7 25; Cezmi Demir ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7\u00a7 111, 112, 114-117; Ali R\u0131za \u00d6zer ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7\u00a7 101-103). Ayr\u0131ca soru\u015fturma sonunda verilen karar, kullan\u0131lan g\u00fcc\u00fcn gereklili\u011fi ve orant\u0131l\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla ilgili bir de\u011ferlendirme i\u00e7ermelidir (baz\u0131 de\u011fi\u015fikliklerle birlikte bkz. Cebrail Bekta\u015f ve Y\u00fcksel \u015eahin, B. No: 2015\/4787, 25\/9\/2019, \u00a7 64).<\/p>\n
24. Ba\u015fvuruya konu edilen soru\u015fturma sonunda verilen kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair kararda Gezi olaylar\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131ndaki genel \u015fiddet hareketlerine de\u011finilmek suretiyle m\u00fcdahalenin zorunlu h\u00e2le geldi\u011fi ifade edilmi\u015f; g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n gerekli ve orant\u0131l\u0131 oldu\u011fu, g\u00fc\u00e7 kullanmak i\u00e7in hakl\u0131 bir neden bulundu\u011fu, g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n da orant\u0131s\u0131z olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmesi yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
25. \u00dclke genelinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen Gezi Park\u0131 eylemleri zaman zaman \u015fiddete evrilmi\u015f, bu husus tutanaklara ve kamera g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerine yans\u0131m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucuya yap\u0131lan m\u00fcdahaleye ili\u015fkin g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcler Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k\u00e7a temin edilememi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu da yaralanma an\u0131na ili\u015fkin bir anlat\u0131m yapmamakla beraber olaylara kat\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kolluk g\u00f6revlilerine kar\u015f\u0131 bir diren\u00e7 g\u00f6stermedi\u011fini savunmu\u015ftur. \u00d6te yandan ba\u015fvurucu, hakk\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda al\u0131nan beyan\u0131nda, ara sokakta y\u00fcr\u00fcrken gaz bombas\u0131 gelmesi \u00fczerine kolluk g\u00f6revlilerinden ka\u00e7maya ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ka\u00e7arken \u00e7ukura d\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, d\u00fc\u015ft\u00fckten sonra g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade etmi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7 5). Bu bak\u0131mdan ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen adli raporlarda tespit edilen bulgular\u0131n kayna\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvurucunun d\u00fc\u015fmesi mi yoksa kolluk m\u00fcdahalesi mi yoksa her ikisi mi oldu\u011fu \u015f\u00fcphelidir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucunun yakalan\u0131p adli mercilere \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in gerekli olandan \u00f6te g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131m\u0131na u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin ba\u015fvuru dosyas\u0131nda bir veri mevcut de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n
26. Ba\u015fvurucu, bireysel ba\u015fvuru formunda kendisini g\u00f6zalt\u0131na alan ve nezarethanede g\u00f6rev yapan g\u00f6revli memur ve amirler hakk\u0131nda su\u00e7 duyurusunda bulundu\u011funu iddia etmi\u015fse de Anayasa Mahkemesine sunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bu dilek\u00e7enin soru\u015fturma dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7inde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131(bkz. \u00a7 8) ve ba\u015fvurucunun aleyhine y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturma s\u00fcrecinde kendi se\u00e7ti\u011fi m\u00fcdafinin yard\u0131m\u0131ndan faydalanmas\u0131na ve i\u00e7inde bulundu\u011fu durumu yak\u0131nlar\u0131na bildirme imk\u00e2n\u0131na sahip olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k nezdinde olay anlat\u0131m\u0131 yapmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Ba\u015fvurucunun k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele iddias\u0131n\u0131 dile getirmemesi, her iki ifadesinde de k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele iddias\u0131n\u0131 dile getirmemesine gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6stermemesinin bu konuda yap\u0131lan de\u011ferlendirme bak\u0131m\u0131ndan olduk\u00e7a dikkat \u00e7ekici oldu\u011funun ifade edilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
27. Ba\u015fvurucu, kollu\u011fa direnmedi\u011fini belirterek kelep\u00e7e kullan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n gerekli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 da iddia etmi\u015ftir. Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere \u00fclke genelinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen ve zaman zaman \u015fiddete evrilen Gezi Park\u0131 eylemleri s\u0131ras\u0131nda bir\u00e7ok ki\u015fi hakk\u0131nda yakalama ve g\u00f6zalt\u0131 i\u015flemleri yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu i\u015flemlerin ve nakillerin g\u00fcvenli bi\u00e7imde ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmesi amac\u0131yla kolluk g\u00f6revlilerinin di\u011fer yakalanan ki\u015filere oldu\u011fu gibi ba\u015fvurucunun da bedensel hareketlerini k\u0131s\u0131tlamaya y\u00f6nelik olarak kelep\u00e7e kullanmas\u0131n\u0131n somut ba\u015fvuru ko\u015fullar\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan makul tedbir kapsam\u0131nda say\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Ayr\u0131ca ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen genel adli muayene raporunda bir kelep\u00e7e izinden s\u00f6z edilmi\u015f oldu\u011fu ancak kelep\u00e7eden kaynaklanan bir yaradan bahsedilmedi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Kelep\u00e7e kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle bileklerinin zarar g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015f olsa da kolluk g\u00f6revlilerinin kendisini yaralama veya a\u015fa\u011f\u0131lama kast\u0131yla hareket ettiklerini ve\/veya somut uygulaman\u0131n kolluk memurlar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan te\u015fhir edilme amac\u0131yla yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia etmemesi kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun kelep\u00e7elenmesinin k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele say\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in aranan asgari e\u015fi\u011fe ula\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
28. Ba\u015fvurucu, biber gaz\u0131na maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia etmi\u015ftir ancak ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen adli raporlar bu hususu do\u011frulamamaktad\u0131r. Ayr\u0131ca ba\u015fvuru dosyas\u0131ndaki hi\u00e7bir unsur ba\u015fvurucunun k\u00f6t\u00fc muameleye ili\u015fkin di\u011fer iddialar\u0131n\u0131 desteklememektedir.<\/p>\n
29. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n maddi boyutunun ihlal edilmedi\u011fi sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
30. Ba\u015fvurucu; etkili soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmedi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrse de birden fazla ve \u00fcstelik bir a\u015famadan sonra kendi se\u00e7ti\u011fi m\u00fcdafinin yard\u0131m\u0131ndan faydalanmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen soru\u015fturman\u0131n hi\u00e7bir a\u015famas\u0131nda k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele iddias\u0131n\u0131 dile getirmemi\u015f, olay anlat\u0131m\u0131 da yapmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u00d6te yandan Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, olay\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fme ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n tespiti i\u00e7inev ve i\u015fyerlerindeki g\u00fcvenlik kameralar\u0131n\u0131n, bas\u0131n ve yay\u0131n kurum ve kurulu\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n elindeki g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcler ile kamera kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n, MOBESE kay\u0131tlar\u0131 ve polis ara\u00e7lar\u0131ndaki g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n toplanmas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik ad\u0131mlar atm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda adli raporlar da ald\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
31. Toplad\u0131\u011f\u0131 deliller \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, polis memurlar\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvurucuya y\u00f6nelik zor kullanma yetkisinin s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n\u0131 a\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak soru\u015fturmaya devam edilmesi ve kamu davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeterli \u015f\u00fcphe olu\u015fturacak delil elde edilmedi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
32. Bireysel ba\u015fvuruya konu soru\u015fturman\u0131n; toplumsal olaylar esnas\u0131nda g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nan ba\u015fvurucu ve birlikte g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 ba\u015fka bir\u00e7ok ki\u015fi hakk\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen g\u00f6revi yapt\u0131rmamak i\u00e7in direnme su\u00e7u kapsam\u0131nda kollu\u011fa g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fcklerinde bu ki\u015filerin \u015fiddete ve cinsel tacize maruz kald\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 beyan etmeleri \u00fczerine kimli\u011fi belirlenemeyen kolluk g\u00f6revlileri hakk\u0131nda Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k\u00e7a resen ba\u015flat\u0131lan bir soru\u015fturma oldu\u011fu, etkili soru\u015fturma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn yaln\u0131zca uygun ara\u00e7lar\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc oldu\u011fu ve Anayasa’n\u0131n 17. maddesinin ki\u015filere \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015fileri yarg\u0131latma ve cezaland\u0131rma hakk\u0131 vermedi\u011fi de g\u00f6zetilerek Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k\u00e7a elde edilen delillerin hukuki olarak yorumlanmas\u0131nda Anayasa’n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan yasakla korunan hakk\u0131 zedeleyecek mahiyette bir de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
33. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutunun da ihlal edilmedi\u011fi sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
B. Ki\u015fi H\u00fcrriyeti ve G\u00fcvenli\u011fi Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia <\/p>\n
34. Ba\u015fvurucunun ki\u015fi \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131n\u0131n Hidayet Karaca ([GK], B. No: 2015\/144, 14\/7\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 53-64); G\u00fcnay Da\u011f ve di\u011ferleri ([GK], B. No: 2013\/1631, 17\/12\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 141-150) ve \u0130brahim S\u00f6nmez ve Nazmiye Kaya, (B. No: 2013\/3193, 15\/10\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 34-47) kararlar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle<\/p>\n
A. Adli yard\u0131m talebinin KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n
B. 1. K\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
2. Ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
C. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n maddi ve usul boyutlar\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LMED\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. 12\/1\/2011 tarihli ve 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu\u2019nun 339. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca tahsil edilmesi ma\u011fduriyetine neden olaca\u011f\u0131ndan adli yard\u0131m talebi kabul edilen ba\u015fvurucunun yarg\u0131lama giderlerini \u00f6demekten TAMAMEN MUAF TUTULMASINA 17\/9\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 17\/9\/2024 tarihli ve 2020\/16726 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 O\u011eULCAN Y\u0130\u011e\u0130T \u00d6ZDEM\u0130R BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/16726) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 17\/9\/2024 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ \u00a0 \u00a0 Selahaddin MENTE\u015e \u00a0 \u00a0 Muhterem \u0130NCE \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : Mustafa Erdem ATLIHAN Ba\u015fvurucu : O\u011fulcan Yi\u011fit \u00d6ZDEM\u0130R Vekili : Av. T\u00fcrkan \u00d6ZDEM\u0130R \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nma s\u00fcrecinde fiziksel ve psikolojik \u015fiddete u\u011franmas\u0131 ve bu hususta yap\u0131lan soru\u015fturman\u0131n etkisiz olmas\u0131 nedeniyle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Bireysel ba\u015fvuru formunda, ba\u015fvurucu, kamuoyunda Gezi Park\u0131 olaylar\u0131 olarak bilinen s\u00fcre\u00e7te Taksim Meydan\u0131’ndaki protesto eylemlerine kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclerek kolluk g\u00f6revlileri taraf\u0131ndan yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade etmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu olaylarla bir ilgisi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, eylemlere kat\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 savunmaktad\u0131r. Olay anlat\u0131m\u0131 yapmayan ba\u015fvurucu g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131n\u0131rken sa\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7ekildi\u011fini, tekmelendi\u011fini, tehdit ve hakarete u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131ktan sonra ise ellerinin arkadan kelep\u00e7elenerek polis otob\u00fcs\u00fcnde \u00f6\u011fle saatinden gece yar\u0131s\u0131na kadar bekletildi\u011fini, otob\u00fcste beklerken ara\u00e7 i\u00e7inde patlayan biber gaz\u0131na maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc nezarethanede ise temel ihtiya\u00e7lar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lanmaks\u0131z\u0131n bir g\u00fcnden fazla s\u00fcreyle haks\u0131z yere tutuldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. 3. Kolluk g\u00f6revlileri olay hakk\u0131nda ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn saat 00.00’da bir tutanak tutmu\u015ftur. Bu tutana\u011fa g\u00f6re31\/5\/2013 g\u00fcn\u00fc Taksim Gezi …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27,535],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-20131","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber","category-uncategorized-tr"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n