{"id":19927,"date":"2024-12-09T12:20:00","date_gmt":"2024-12-09T09:20:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uncategorized-tr\/tasinmazlarin-mal-rejiminin-sona-erdigi-murisin-olum-tarihinden-once-satilmasi-olume-bagli-mal-rejiminin-tasfiyesi\/"},"modified":"2024-12-09T12:20:00","modified_gmt":"2024-12-09T09:20:00","slug":"tasinmazlarin-mal-rejiminin-sona-erdigi-murisin-olum-tarihinden-once-satilmasi-olume-bagli-mal-rejiminin-tasfiyesi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/tasinmazlarin-mal-rejiminin-sona-erdigi-murisin-olum-tarihinden-once-satilmasi-olume-bagli-mal-rejiminin-tasfiyesi\/","title":{"rendered":"TA\u015eINMAZLARIN MAL REJ\u0130M\u0130N\u0130N SONA ERD\u0130\u011e\u0130 MUR\u0130S\u0130N \u00d6L\u00dcM TAR\u0130H\u0130NDEN \u00d6NCE SATILMASI – \u00d6L\u00dcME BA\u011eLI MAL REJ\u0130M\u0130N\u0130N TASF\u0130YES\u0130"},"content":{"rendered":"

T.C.
\nYARGITAY
\n2. HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130
\nE. 2023\/2422
\nK. 2023\/5741
\nT. 29.11.2023<\/p>\n

TAPU \u0130PTAL\u0130 VE TESC\u0130L ( M\u00fcmk\u00fcn Olmamas\u0131 Halinde Kat\u0131lma Alaca\u011f\u0131 Talebi\/Tasfiye Konusu Ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n Mal Rejiminin Sona Erdi\u011fi Murisin \u00d6l\u00fcm Tarihinden Alt\u0131 Y\u0131ldan Fazla Bir S\u00fcre \u00d6nce 26.10.1998 Tarihinde Sat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 Mal Rejimin Sona Erdi\u011fi Tarihte Mevcut Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 Anla\u015f\u0131lmakla Mahkemece Mal Rejiminin Sona Erdi\u011fi S\u0131rada Mevcut Olan Mallar\u0131n Tasfiye Edilmesi Gerekti\u011finden \u0130\u015fbu \u00dc\u00e7 Ta\u015f\u0131nmaz Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden Davan\u0131n Reddine Karar Verilmesi Gerekirken Tasfiyeye Dahil Edilerek Alaca\u011f\u0131n Belirlenmesinin Hatal\u0131 Oldu\u011fu )<\/p>\n

KATKI PAYI ( Mahkemece Davac\u0131lar\u0131n Murisi ve Daval\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n Murisinin E\u015fit Gelire Sahip Oldu\u011fu Kabul Edilerek Taraflar\u0131n Ki\u015fisel Harcamalar\u0131 ve Erke\u011fin \u0130a\u015fe Y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc de G\u00f6zetilerek Erke\u011fin % 33,33, Kad\u0131n\u0131n % 66,66 Olarak Belirlenen Katk\u0131 Pay\u0131 Oran\u0131na G\u00f6re Alacak Belirlenmi\u015f \u0130se de Belirlenen Katk\u0131 Pay\u0131 Oran\u0131n Dosya Kapsam\u0131 \u0130le \u00d6rt\u00fc\u015fmedi\u011fi\/Murislerin Evlendiklerinde Kad\u0131n E\u015fin \u0130lk E\u015finden Olma \u00dc\u00e7 \u00c7ocu\u011funun Oldu\u011fu Erkek E\u015fin \u0130se \u00c7ocu\u011funun Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 E\u015flerin Evlendikten Sonra Ortak \u00c7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131n da Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kad\u0131n E\u015fin \u0130lk E\u015finden Olan \u00c7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131n da Kad\u0131nla Birlikte Kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 Anla\u015f\u0131lmakla Kad\u0131n E\u015fin \u00c7ocuklar\u0131 da G\u00f6zetilerek Ki\u015fisel Harcama Oran\u0131n\u0131n Daha Y\u00fcksek Olmas\u0131 Gerekti\u011fi )<\/p>\n

K\u0130\u015e\u0130SEL HARCAMA ORANI ( Murislerin Evlendiklerinde Kad\u0131n E\u015fin \u0130lk E\u015finden Olma \u00dc\u00e7 \u00c7ocu\u011funun Oldu\u011fu Erkek E\u015fin \u0130se \u00c7ocu\u011funun Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 E\u015flerin Evlendikten Sonra Ortak \u00c7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131n da Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kad\u0131n E\u015fin \u0130lk E\u015finden Olan \u00c7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131n da Kad\u0131nla Birlikte Kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 Anla\u015f\u0131lmakla Kad\u0131n E\u015fin \u00c7ocuklar\u0131 da G\u00f6zetilerek Ki\u015fisel Harcama Oran\u0131n\u0131n Daha Y\u00fcksek Olmas\u0131 Gerekti\u011fi\/Mahkemece Kad\u0131n E\u015fin \u0130lk E\u015finden \u00c7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131n da Oldu\u011fu G\u00f6zetilerek Ki\u015fisel Harcama Oran\u0131n Belirlenerek E\u015flerin Katk\u0131 Pay\u0131 Oran\u0131n\u0131n Belirlenmesi Gerekirken Kad\u0131n E\u015fin Ki\u015fisel Harcama Oran\u0131n\u0131n D\u00fc\u015f\u00fck Belirlenmesinin Hatal\u0131 Oldu\u011fu )<\/p>\n

TA\u015eINMAZ DE\u011eER BEL\u0130RLEMES\u0130 ( Ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n De\u011ferinin Belirleme Y\u00f6nteminin Yetersiz Oldu\u011fu\/Ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n Ke\u015ffin Yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 23.05.2015 Tarihinde Belirlenen De\u011ferlerine G\u00f6re T\u00dc\u0130K ve TEFE Verileri Kullan\u0131larak Ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n Davan\u0131n A\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 13.08.2010 Tarihindeki De\u011ferinin Hesap Raporunda Belirlendi\u011fi Anla\u015f\u0131lmakla Mahkemece Tasfiyeye Dahil Edilecek Ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n Dava Tarihindeki Rayi\u00e7 (S\u00fcr\u00fcm) De\u011ferlerinin Konusunda Uzman Bilirki\u015fi Taraf\u0131ndan Yerinde \u0130nceleme Yap\u0131larak Belirlenmesi Gerekti\u011fi )<\/p>\n

\u00d6L\u00dcME BA\u011eLI MAL REJ\u0130M\u0130N\u0130N TASF\u0130YES\u0130 ( Davac\u0131lar\u0131n Mal Rejiminin Tasfiyesi Nedeniyle Talep Etti\u011fi ve Terekeye Ait Alacak Say\u0131lan Alacak Miktar\u0131ndan Daval\u0131lar\u0131n da Ayn\u0131 Zamanda Murisin Miras\u00e7\u0131s\u0131 Olmalar\u0131 Nedeniyle Hak Sahibi Oldu\u011fu\/Buna G\u00f6re Somut Olayda H\u00fck\u00fcm Alt\u0131na Al\u0131nan Tereke Alaca\u011f\u0131ndan Daval\u0131lar\u0131n da Miras Pay\u0131 Oran\u0131nda Hak Sahibi Oldu\u011fu da G\u00f6z \u00d6n\u00fcnde Bulundurularak Daval\u0131lar\u0131n Miras Pay\u0131 Oran\u0131nda Sorumlu Oldu\u011fu Miktar\u0131n H\u00fck\u00fcm F\u0131kras\u0131nda G\u00f6sterilmesi Gerekti\u011fi )<\/p>\n

4721\/m.46,179,202<\/p>\n

743\/m.152,153,170,186<\/p>\n

818\/m.146,544<\/p>\n

6098\/m.50,51,646<\/p>\n

6100\/m.26,33,176<\/p>\n

\u00d6ZET: Dava, tapu iptali ve tescil, m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmamas\u0131 halinde katk\u0131 pay\u0131 alaca\u011f\u0131 istemine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n

Uyu\u015fmal\u0131k, hukuki nitelendirme, katk\u0131 pay\u0131 oran\u0131 ve katk\u0131n\u0131n ispat\u0131, alacak hesab\u0131nda davac\u0131lar\u0131n miras pay\u0131 oran\u0131n\u0131n dikkate al\u0131n\u0131p al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, tasfiyeye dahil edilecek mallar, katk\u0131 pay\u0131 alaca\u011f\u0131 hesab\u0131nda mallar\u0131n hangi tarihteki de\u011ferinin dikkate al\u0131naca\u011f\u0131 noktas\u0131nda toplanmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

1- Daval\u0131lar vekilinin tasfiyeye konu 3161 ada 166 parsel 7, 27 ve 28 numaral\u0131 ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcmlere y\u00f6nelik temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n incelemesinde; tasfiye konusu ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n mal rejiminin sona erdi\u011fi murisin \u00f6l\u00fcm tarihi olan 09.01.2005 tarihinden alt\u0131 y\u0131ldan fazla bir s\u00fcre \u00f6nce, 26.10.1998 tarihinde sat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, mal rejimin sona erdi\u011fi tarihte mevcut olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. O halde, Mahkemece mal rejiminin sona erdi\u011fi s\u0131rada mevcut olan mallar\u0131n tasfiye edilmesi gerekti\u011finden, i\u015fbu \u00fc\u00e7 ta\u015f\u0131nmaz y\u00f6n\u00fcnden davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesi gerekirken, tasfiyeye dahil edilerek alaca\u011f\u0131n belirlenmesi hatal\u0131 olmu\u015f, bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

2- Davac\u0131lar vekilinin katk\u0131 pay\u0131 oran\u0131na y\u00f6nelik temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n incelemesinde; Mahkemece, davac\u0131lar\u0131n murisi ve daval\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n murisinin e\u015fit gelire sahip oldu\u011fu kabul edilerek, taraflar\u0131n ki\u015fisel harcamalar\u0131 ve erke\u011fin ia\u015fe y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc de g\u00f6zetilerek erke\u011fin % 33,33, kad\u0131n\u0131n % 66,66 olarak belirlenen katk\u0131 pay\u0131 oran\u0131na g\u00f6re alacak belirlenmi\u015f ise de, belirlenen katk\u0131 pay\u0131 oran\u0131n dosya kapsam\u0131 ile \u00f6rt\u00fc\u015fmemektedir. \u015e\u00f6yle ki, Mahkemece davac\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n murisi erkek e\u015f ile daval\u0131lar\u0131n murisi kad\u0131n e\u015fin gelirlerinin e\u015fit kabul edilmesi yerinde ise de, murislerin evlendiklerinde kad\u0131n e\u015fin ilk e\u015finden olma \u00fc\u00e7 \u00e7ocu\u011funun oldu\u011fu, erkek e\u015fin ise \u00e7ocu\u011funun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, e\u015flerin evlendikten sonra ortak \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131n da olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, kad\u0131n e\u015fin ilk e\u015finden olan \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131n da kad\u0131nla birlikte kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmakla, kad\u0131n e\u015fin \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 da g\u00f6zetilerek ki\u015fisel harcama oran\u0131n\u0131n daha y\u00fcksek olmas\u0131 gerekirken yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde kabul edilmesi hatal\u0131 olmu\u015ftur. O halde, Mahkemece, kad\u0131n e\u015fin ilk e\u015finden \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131n da oldu\u011fu g\u00f6zetilerek ki\u015fisel harcama oran\u0131n belirlenerek e\u015flerin katk\u0131 pay\u0131 oran\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesi gerekirken, kad\u0131n e\u015fin ki\u015fisel harcama oran\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck belirlenmesi hatal\u0131 olmu\u015f, bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir. 3-Taraf vekillerinin ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n de\u011ferine y\u00f6nelik temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n incelemesinde; Mahkemece, dava katk\u0131 pay\u0131 alaca\u011f\u0131 istemine ili\u015fkin oldu\u011fundan ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n dava tarihindeki de\u011ferinin esas al\u0131narak alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesi yerinde ise de, ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n de\u011ferinin belirleme y\u00f6ntemi yetersizdir. \u015e\u00f6yle ki, ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n ke\u015ffin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 23.05.2015 tarihinde belirlenen de\u011ferlerine g\u00f6re, T\u00dc\u0130K ve TEFE verileri kullan\u0131larak ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 13.08.2010 tarihindeki de\u011ferinin hesap raporunda belirlendi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. O halde, Mahkemece, tasfiyeye dahil edilecek ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n dava tarihindeki rayi\u00e7 (s\u00fcr\u00fcm) de\u011ferlerinin, konusunda uzman bilirki\u015fi taraf\u0131ndan yerinde inceleme yap\u0131larak belirlenmesi gerekirken, yap\u0131lan de\u011fer tespitine g\u00f6re alaca\u011f\u0131n belirlenmesi hatal\u0131 olmu\u015f, bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

4-Daval\u0131lar vekilinin miras pay oranlar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n incelemesinde; dava, \u00f6l\u00fcme ba\u011fl\u0131 mal rejiminin tasfiyesi ile alacak iste\u011fine ili\u015fkin olup davac\u0131lar temyize konu davay\u0131 terekenin alacakl\u0131s\u0131 s\u0131fat\u0131yla a\u00e7m\u0131\u015f ise de, davac\u0131lar da dahil daval\u0131lar\u0131n murisi, buna ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak daval\u0131lar\u0131n da ortak mirasb\u0131rakan\u0131n miras\u00e7\u0131s\u0131d\u0131rlar ve tereke bor\u00e7lar\u0131ndan kanuni d\u00fczenlemeler \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde hepsi de sorumludurlar. T\u00fcm bu a\u00e7\u0131klamalar nedeniyle, davac\u0131lar\u0131n mal rejiminin tasfiyesi nedeniyle talep etti\u011fi ve terekeye ait alacak say\u0131lan alacak miktar\u0131ndan, daval\u0131lar\u0131n da ayn\u0131 zamanda murisin miras\u00e7\u0131s\u0131 olmalar\u0131 nedeniyle hak sahibidirler. Buna g\u00f6re, somut olayda h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131nan tereke alaca\u011f\u0131ndan daval\u0131lar\u0131n da miras pay\u0131 oran\u0131nda hak sahibi oldu\u011fu da g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurularak daval\u0131lar\u0131n miras pay\u0131 oran\u0131nda sorumlu oldu\u011fu miktar\u0131n h\u00fck\u00fcm f\u0131kras\u0131nda g\u00f6sterilmesi gerekirken bu husus g\u00f6z ard\u0131 edilerek karar verilmesi do\u011fru olmam\u0131\u015f, bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

DAVA : Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki tapu iptali ve tescil, m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmamas\u0131 halinde katk\u0131 pay\u0131 alaca\u011f\u0131 davas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 bozma sonras\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda, Mahkemece davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne k\u0131smen reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Mahkeme karar\u0131 davac\u0131lar vekili ve daval\u0131lar vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmekle; kesinlik, s\u00fcre, temyiz \u015fart\u0131 ve di\u011fer usul eksiklikleri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yap\u0131lan \u00f6n inceleme sonucunda, temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin kabul\u00fcne karar verildikten ve Tetkik H\u00e2kimi taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan rapor dinlendikten sonra dosyadaki belgeler incelenip gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n

KARAR : I. DAVA<\/p>\n

1. Davac\u0131lar vekili dava dilek\u00e7esinde; m\u00fcvekkillerinin murisi …in daval\u0131lar\u0131n annesi … ile 1955 y\u0131l\u0131nda evlendiklerini, evlilikleri s\u0131ras\u0131nda 1126 ada 166 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131 birlikte edindikleri, tapuda … ad\u0131na kay\u0131t ve tescil edildi\u011fini, ta\u015f\u0131nmaz \u00fczerindeki intifa hakk\u0131n\u0131n ise m\u00fcvekkillerinin murisi M. ad\u0131na oldu\u011funu; daha sonra kat kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 in\u015faat s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n 1, 7, 8, 27 ve 28 numaral\u0131 ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerinin yine intifa hakk\u0131 m\u00fcvekkillerinin murisi M. ad\u0131na olmak \u00fczere … ad\u0131na tescil edildi\u011fini; bu ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerin edinilmi\u015f mallara kat\u0131lma rejimi edinildi\u011fini, kat kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 in\u015faat s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi yap\u0131lmadan \u00f6nce dahi ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n evlilik birli\u011fi i\u00e7inde edinildi\u011fini; m\u00fcvekkillerinin murisi, e\u015fi … ile Tekel Kurumu’nda birlikte \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 ve emekli olduklar\u0131n\u0131, emekli ikramiyeleri ile ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131 birlikte edindiklerini belirterek; fazlaya ili\u015fkin her t\u00fcrl\u00fc haklar\u0131 sakl\u0131 kalmak kayd\u0131yla, 1126 ada 166 parsel 1, 7, 8, 27 ve 28 numaral\u0131 ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerinin tapu kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n iptali ile m\u00fcvekkilleri ad\u0131na tescil edilerek ayni olarak tahsilini, ayni tescilin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmamas\u0131 halinde 1126 ada 166 parsel 1, 7, 8, 27 ve 28 numaral\u0131 ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcmler ile ilgili olarak mal rejimin tasfiyesi sebebiyle \u015fimdilik 8,000,00 TL kat\u0131lma alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n rejimin son bulma tarihi olan 09.01.2005 tarihinden itibaren i\u015fleyecek yasal faizi ile birlikte daval\u0131lardan m\u00fc\u015ftereken ve m\u00fcteselsilen tahsilini, ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n ki\u015fisel mallar kategorisinde de\u011ferlendirilmesi h\u00e2linde, bu defa \u015fimdilik 8.000,00 TL de\u011fer art\u0131\u015f pay\u0131n\u0131n rejimin son bulma tarihi olan 09.01.2005 tarihinden itibaren i\u015fleyecek yasal faizi ile birlikte daval\u0131lardan m\u00fc\u015ftereken ve m\u00fcteselsilen tahsilini talep ve dava etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

2. Davac\u0131lar vekili 31.12.2014 tarihli dilek\u00e7esinde; fazlaya ili\u015fkin haklar\u0131 sakl\u0131 kalmak kayd\u0131yla harca esas de\u011feri 992.000,00 TL art\u0131rarak mal rejiminin sona ermi\u015f olmas\u0131 nedeni ile (kat\u0131lma\/katk\u0131 pay\u0131\/de\u011fer art\u0131\u015f pay\u0131 alacaklar\u0131na dayal\u0131 olarak) 1126 ada 166 parsel 1, 7, 8, 27 ve 28 numaral\u0131 ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerinin tapu kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n iptali ile m\u00fcvekkilleri ad\u0131na tescil edilerek ayni olarak tahsilini, ayni tescilin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmamas\u0131 halinde 1126 ada 166 parsel 1, 7, 8, 27 ve 28 numaral\u0131 ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcmler ile ilgili olarak 1.000.000,00 TL (kat\u0131lma\/katk\u0131 pay\u0131\/de\u011fer art\u0131\u015f pay\u0131) alaca\u011f\u0131n rejimin son bulma tarihi olan 09.01.2005 tarihinden itibaren i\u015fleyecek yasal faizi ile birlikte daval\u0131lardan m\u00fc\u015ftereken ve m\u00fcteselsilen tahsilini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

II. CEVAP<\/p>\n

Daval\u0131lar vekili cevap dilek\u00e7esinde; m\u00fcvekkillerinin annesi …’nin m\u00fcvekkillerinin \u00f6z babalar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnden sonra 1955 y\u0131l\u0131nda M. ile evlendi\u011fini, bu evlilikten \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, her ikisinin de Tekel’de \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131 s\u0131rada edindikleri birikim ile tek katl\u0131 ev yapt\u0131rd\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, muris …’nin daha \u00f6nce emekli olmas\u0131 ile evin \u00fcst kat\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7\u0131k\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, sonras\u0131nda ise kat kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 m\u00fcteahhide verilerek daire al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, al\u0131nan dairelerin \u00fc\u00e7 tanesinin m\u00fcvekkilleri taraf\u0131ndan sat\u0131n al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kalan iki dairenin ise birisinde kar\u0131-kocan\u0131n birlikte oturdu\u011funu, di\u011ferini ise kiraya vererek buradan ald\u0131klar\u0131 kiray\u0131, emekli maa\u015flar\u0131 ile birle\u015ftirerek ge\u00e7inmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, i\u015fbu s\u00f6zkonusu iki dairenin \u00e7\u0131plak m\u00fclkiyetinin muris …’ye, intifa hakk\u0131n\u0131n muris …e ait oldu\u011funu, …in \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc ile intifa hakk\u0131n\u0131n sona erdi\u011fini, miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131n sakl\u0131 paylar\u0131n\u0131n olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, davan\u0131n ayni talebi nedeniyle asliye hukuk mahkemesinde a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini, zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n doldu\u011funu belirterek; davan\u0131n reddini savunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

III. MAHKEME KARARI<\/p>\n

1. Dava, ilk Aile Mahkemesinde a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olup Kad\u0131k\u00f6y 2. Aile Mahkemesi’nin 17.03.2011 tarih ve 2010\/720 Esas, 2011\/293 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar ile, g\u00f6revli mahkemenin asliye hukuk mahkemeleri oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle g\u00f6revsizlik karar\u0131 verilmi\u015f, i\u015fbu karar temyiz edilmeksizin 24.06.2011 tarihinde kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

2. Kad\u0131k\u00f6y 4. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi’nin 26.04.2012 tarih ve 2011\/401 Esas, 2012\/201 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile, davac\u0131lar\u0131n murisinin daval\u0131lar\u0131n murisi olan e\u015fine yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan tasarruf i\u015fleminin ba\u011f\u0131\u015f niteli\u011finde oldu\u011fu, davac\u0131lar\u0131n katk\u0131 pay\u0131ndan do\u011fan alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n hesaplanmas\u0131na imkan bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle; davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

IV. BOZMA VE BOZMADAN SONRAK\u0130 YARGILAMA S\u00dcREC\u0130<\/p>\n

A. Birinci Bozma Karar\u0131<\/p>\n

1. Mahkeme karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde davac\u0131lar vekili temyiz isteminde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

2.Yarg\u0131tay 8. Hukuk Dairesinin 11.12.2012 tarih ve 2011\/8352 Esas, 2012\/12144 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile, talebin mal rejiminin \u00f6l\u00fcm nedeni ile sona ermesinden kaynakland\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6zetilerek davaya Aile Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan bak\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011finin dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 ve Mahkemece g\u00f6revsizlik karar\u0131 verilmesi gerekirken bu hususun g\u00f6zden ka\u00e7\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 ve davac\u0131n\u0131n talebi hatal\u0131 \u015fekilde nitelendirilerek i\u015fin esas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmu\u015f olmas\u0131n\u0131n usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu belirtilerek; davac\u0131lar vekilinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fcyle h\u00fckm\u00fcn bozulmas\u0131na, bozma sebebine g\u00f6re di\u011fer hususlar\u0131n \u015fimdilik incelenmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

B. \u0130kinci Bozma Karar\u0131<\/p>\n

1. Bozmaya uyan … 17. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi’nin 05.09.2013 tarih ve 2013\/320 Esas, 2013\/309 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile, talebin mal rejiminin \u00f6l\u00fcm nedeni ile sona ermesinden kaynakland\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6zetilerek davaya Aile Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan bak\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle g\u00f6revsizlik karar\u0131 verilmi\u015f, i\u015fbu karar 14.10.2013 tarihinde kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

2…. 19. Aile Mahkemenin 10.12.2020 tarih ve 2013\/1246 Esas, 2020\/785 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile, davan\u0131n katk\u0131 pay\u0131 alaca\u011f\u0131 istemine ili\u015fkin oldu\u011fu, davac\u0131lar\u0131n murisi …in 09.01.2005 tarihinde, daval\u0131lar\u0131n murisi …’nin 23.04.2007 tarihinde vefat etti\u011fi, erkek e\u015fin tasarruf miktar\u0131n\u0131n 2\/6, kad\u0131n e\u015fin tasarruf miktar\u0131n\u0131n 4\/6 oran\u0131nda oldu\u011fu, Mahkememizce dosyaya SGK Unkapan\u0131 M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, \u00c7al\u0131\u015fma ve Sosyal G\u00fcvenlik Emeklilik Hizmetleri Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden getirtilen bilgi ve belgeler \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ta\u015f\u0131nmazlara yap\u0131lan katk\u0131n\u0131n hangi oranda yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n hakkaniyet ve fedakarl\u0131\u011f\u0131n denkle\u015ftirilmesi ilkesinin uygulanarak hesaplanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi, bu y\u00f6n\u00fcyle taraflar\u0131n dosya kapsam\u0131ndan katk\u0131 oranlar\u0131n\u0131n e\u015fit oranda yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirildi\u011fi; taraflar\u0131n gelirlerinin e\u015fit oranda say\u0131lmas\u0131 ile kad\u0131n e\u015fin yapabilece\u011fi katk\u0131 oran\u0131n\u0131n % 66,66, erkek e\u015fin ise katk\u0131 oran\u0131n\u0131n % 33,33 oran\u0131nda olaca\u011f\u0131; buna g\u00f6re 3161 ada 166 parsel 1 numaral\u0131 ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcm y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n dava tarihindeki de\u011feri olan 210.000,00 TL x % 33,33 = 69.993,00 TL katk\u0131 pay\u0131 alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, 3161 ada 166 parsel 7 numaral\u0131 ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcm y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n dava tariihndeki de\u011feri 280.000,00 TL x % 33,33 = 93.234,00 TL katk\u0131 pay\u0131 alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, 3161 ada 166 parsel 8 numaral\u0131 ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcm y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n dava tarihindeki de\u011feri 280.000,00 TL x % 33,33 = 93,234,00 TL katk\u0131 pay\u0131 alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, 3161 ada 166 parsel 27 numaral\u0131 ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcm y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n dava tarihindeki de\u011feri 266,000,00 TL x % 33,33 = 88.657,80 TL katk\u0131 pay\u0131 alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, 3161 ada 166 parsel 28 numaral\u0131 ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcm y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n dava tarihindeki de\u011feri 266,000,00 TL x % 33,33 = 88.657,80 TL katk\u0131 pay\u0131 alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle; davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fc ile; 3161 ada 166 parsel 1 numaral\u0131 ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z ta\u015f\u0131nmaz y\u00f6n\u00fcnden 69.993,00 TL, 3161 ada 166 parsel 7 numaral\u0131 ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcm y\u00f6n\u00fcnden 93.234,00 TL, 3161 ada 166 parsel 8 numaral\u0131 ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcm y\u00f6n\u00fcnden 93,234,00 TL, 3161 ada 166 parsel 27 numaral\u0131 ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcm y\u00f6n\u00fcnden 88.657,80 TL, 3161 ada 166 parsel 28 numaral\u0131 ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcm y\u00f6n\u00fcnden 88.657,80 TL katk\u0131 pay\u0131 alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n dava tarihinden i\u015fleyecek yasal faizi ile birlikte daval\u0131lardan m\u00fc\u015ftereken ve m\u00fcteselsilen al\u0131narak davac\u0131lara \u00f6denmesine y\u00f6nelik verilen karara kar\u015f\u0131, s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde davac\u0131lar vekili ve daval\u0131lar vekili temyiz isteminde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

3. Dairenin 21.03.2022 tarih ve 2021\/8596 Esas, 2022\/2625 Karar day\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile, somut olayda davac\u0131lar\u0131n dava dilek\u00e7esinde tasfiyeye konu ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n tapu kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n iptali ile davac\u0131lar ad\u0131na tescilini, m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmamas\u0131 halinde mal rejiminin tasfiyesinden kaynaklanan alaca\u011f\u0131n tahsiline karar verilmesini talep etti\u011fi, Mahkemece davac\u0131lar\u0131n asli talebi olan tapu iptali ve tescil iste\u011fi hakk\u0131nda olumlu olumsuz bir karar verilmeden do\u011frudan alacak talebi hakk\u0131nda karar verildi\u011fi, Mahkemece davac\u0131lar\u0131n terditli talepleri hakk\u0131nda ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 olumlu-olumsuz bir karar verilmesi gerekirken, bu hususlar g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nmadan karar verilmesi usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu belirtilerek; h\u00fckm\u00fcn bozulmas\u0131na, bozma sebebine g\u00f6re taraflar\u0131n di\u011fer temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n \u015fimdilik incelenmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

C. Mahkemece Bozmaya Uyularak Verilen Son Karar<\/p>\n

Mahkemenin yukar\u0131daki ba\u015fl\u0131kta tarih ve say\u0131s\u0131 belirtilen karar\u0131 ile, davan\u0131n katk\u0131 pay\u0131 alaca\u011f\u0131 istemine ili\u015fkin oldu\u011fu, davac\u0131lar\u0131n murisi …in 09.01.2005 tarihinde, daval\u0131lar\u0131n murisi …’nin 23.04.2007 tarihinde vefat etti\u011fi, erkek e\u015fin tasarruf miktar\u0131n\u0131n 2\/6, kad\u0131n e\u015fin tasarruf miktar\u0131n\u0131n 4\/6 oran\u0131nda oldu\u011fu, Mahkememizce dosyaya SGK Unkapan\u0131 M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, \u00c7al\u0131\u015fma ve Sosyal G\u00fcvenlik Emeklilik Hizmetleri Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden getirtilen bilgi ve belgeler \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ta\u015f\u0131nmazlara yap\u0131lan katk\u0131n\u0131n hangi oranda yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n hakkaniyet ve fedakarl\u0131\u011f\u0131n denkle\u015ftirilmesi ilkesinin uygulanarak hesaplanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi, bu y\u00f6n\u00fcyle taraflar\u0131n dosya kapsam\u0131ndan katk\u0131 oranlar\u0131n\u0131n e\u015fit oranda yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirildi\u011fi; taraflar\u0131n gelirlerinin e\u015fit oranda say\u0131lmas\u0131 ile kad\u0131n e\u015fin yapabilece\u011fi katk\u0131 oran\u0131n\u0131n % 66,66, erkek e\u015fin ise katk\u0131 oran\u0131n\u0131n % 33,33 oran\u0131nda olaca\u011f\u0131; buna g\u00f6re 3161 ada 166 parsel 1 numaral\u0131 ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcm y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n dava tarihindeki de\u011feri olan 210.000,00 TL x % 33,33 = 69.993,00 TL katk\u0131 pay\u0131 alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, 3161 ada 166 parsel 7 numaral\u0131 ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcm y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n dava tariihndeki de\u011feri 280.000,00 TL x % 33,33 = 93.234,00 TL katk\u0131 pay\u0131 alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, 3161 ada 166 parsel 8 numaral\u0131 ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcm y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n dava tarihindeki de\u011feri 280.000,00 TL x % 33,33 = 93,234,00 TL katk\u0131 pay\u0131 alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, 3161 ada 166 parsel 27 numaral\u0131 ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcm y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n dava tarihindeki de\u011feri 266,000,00 TL x % 33,33 = 88.657,80 TL katk\u0131 pay\u0131 alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, 3161 ada 166 parsel 28 numaral\u0131 ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcm y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n dava tarihindeki de\u011feri 266,000,00 TL x % 33,33 = 88.657,80 TL katk\u0131 pay\u0131 alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011fu; taraflar\u0131n mal ayr\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 rejimi d\u00f6neminde edinilen ve muris … ad\u0131na tescili yap\u0131lan ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n muris taraf\u0131ndan \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc bir \u015fah\u0131s ad\u0131na muvazaal\u0131 \u015fekilde devrinin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair dosya kapsam\u0131nda bir delil bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi, mal rejiminin tasfiyesi davalar\u0131nda ancak tasfiyeden kaynakl\u0131 alacaklar\u0131n talep edilip davaya konu yap\u0131labilece\u011fi, m\u00fclkiyet aktar\u0131m\u0131na sebep olacak \u015fekilde tapu iptal ve tescil karar\u0131n\u0131n verilemeyece\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle; davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fc ile, tapu iptal tescil davas\u0131n\u0131n reddine; 3161 ada 166 parsel 1 numaral\u0131 ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z ta\u015f\u0131nmaz y\u00f6n\u00fcnden 69.993,00 TL, 3161 ada 166 parsel 7 numaral\u0131 ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcm y\u00f6n\u00fcnden 93.234,00 TL, 3161 ada 166 parsel 8 numaral\u0131 ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcm y\u00f6n\u00fcnden 93,234,00 TL, 3161 ada 166 parsel 27 numaral\u0131 ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcm y\u00f6n\u00fcnden 88.657,80 TL, 3161 ada 166 parsel 28 numaral\u0131 ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcm y\u00f6n\u00fcnden 88.657,80 TL katk\u0131 pay\u0131 alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n dava tarihinden i\u015fleyecek yasal faizi ile birlikte daval\u0131lardan m\u00fc\u015ftereken ve m\u00fcteselsilen al\u0131narak davac\u0131lara \u00f6denmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

V. TEMY\u0130Z<\/p>\n

A. Temyiz Yoluna Ba\u015fvuran<\/p>\n

Mahkemenin yukar\u0131da belirtilen karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde davac\u0131lar vekili ve daval\u0131lar vekili temyiz isteminde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

B. Temyiz Sebepleri<\/p>\n

1. Davac\u0131lar vekili temyiz dilek\u00e7esinde; ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n m\u00fcvekkillerinin murisi ile ortak al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n sabit oldu\u011funu, ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n g\u00fcncel de\u011feri belirlenerek, taraflar\u0131n gelirleri celp edilerek katk\u0131 pay\u0131 oran\u0131 belirlenerek ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n tapu kayd\u0131n\u0131n iptali ile m\u00fcvekkilleri ad\u0131na tesciline, m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmamas\u0131 halinde katk\u0131 pay\u0131 alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tahsiline karar verilmesi gerekti\u011fini, m\u00fcvekkillerinin miras\u00e7\u0131 olarak haklar\u0131 oldu\u011funu, g\u00f6revsiz mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan ke\u015fif yap\u0131larak ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n de\u011ferinin belirlendi\u011fini, g\u00fcncel de\u011ferler y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yeniden ke\u015fif yap\u0131larak rapor al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini, ta\u015f\u0131nmaz de\u011ferlerinin d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck belirlendi\u011fini, Mahkemece itirazlar\u0131 hususunda de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n g\u00fcncel de\u011ferlerinin esas al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini, katk\u0131 pay\u0131 oran\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck belirlendi\u011fini, m\u00fcvekkillerinin murisinin katk\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n % 50 den az oldu\u011funu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclemeyece\u011fini, katk\u0131 oranlar\u0131n\u0131n e\u015fit oldu\u011funu, m\u00fcvekkillerinin murisinin e\u015fi d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda bakmakla y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc oldu\u011fu kimsenin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, murisin tasarruf edebilece\u011fi oran\u0131n daha y\u00fcksek oldu\u011funu, daval\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n murisin evlenmeden \u00f6nce \u00fc\u00e7 \u00e7ocu\u011fu oldu\u011funu belirterek karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

2.Daval\u0131lar vekili temyiz dilek\u00e7esinde; muris …in \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc ile miras\u0131n\u0131n 1\/2’sinin m\u00fcvekkillerinin murisi …’ye kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, m\u00fcvekkillerinin de …’nin miras\u00e7\u0131s\u0131 olarak muris …in de miras\u00e7\u0131s\u0131 olduklar\u0131n\u0131, bu hususun g\u00f6z ard\u0131 edildi\u011fini, gerek\u00e7enin \u00e7eli\u015fkili oldu\u011funu ve anla\u015f\u0131l\u0131r olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, hukuki nitelendirmenin hatal\u0131 oldu\u011funu, ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n mal ayr\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 rejiminin ge\u00e7erli oldu\u011fu d\u00f6nemde edinildi\u011fi, taraflar\u0131n gelirlerine ili\u015fkin belgelerin gelmedi\u011fi, tamamen tahmini sonu\u00e7lara g\u00f6re katk\u0131 pay\u0131 oran\u0131n\u0131n belirlendi\u011fi, katk\u0131 pay\u0131 alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bo\u015fanma ile evlili\u011fin sona erdi\u011fi durumlarda kabul edilebilece\u011fi, evlili\u011fin \u00f6l\u00fcm ile sona erdi\u011fini, sadece davac\u0131lar\u0131n tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131lar\u0131n katk\u0131y\u0131 ispatlayamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, daval\u0131lar\u0131n murisi ad\u0131na sadece 1 ve 8 numaral\u0131 ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcmler mevcut iken, muris ad\u0131na kay\u0131tl\u0131 olmayan 7, 27 ve 28 numaral\u0131 ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcmler y\u00f6n\u00fcnden de katk\u0131 pay\u0131 alaca\u011f\u0131 h\u00fckmedilmesinin hatal\u0131 oldu\u011funu, davan\u0131n muris muvazaas\u0131na dayal\u0131 bir dava olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

C. Gerek\u00e7e<\/p>\n

1. Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k ve Hukuki Nitelendirme<\/p>\n

Uyu\u015fmal\u0131k, hukuki nitelendirme, katk\u0131 pay\u0131 oran\u0131 ve katk\u0131n\u0131n ispat\u0131, alacak hesab\u0131nda davac\u0131lar\u0131n miras pay\u0131 oran\u0131n\u0131n dikkate al\u0131n\u0131p al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, tasfiyeye dahil edilecek mallar, katk\u0131 pay\u0131 alaca\u011f\u0131 hesab\u0131nda mallar\u0131n hangi tarihteki de\u011ferinin dikkate al\u0131naca\u011f\u0131 noktas\u0131nda toplanmaktad\u0131r. Dava, tapu iptali ve tescil, m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmamas\u0131 halinde katk\u0131 pay\u0131 alaca\u011f\u0131 istemine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n

2. \u0130lgili Hukuk<\/p>\n

6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu’nun 26. maddesi, 33. maddesi, 176 ve devam\u0131 maddeleri, 190. maddesi, ge\u00e7ici 3. maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131 atf\u0131yla uygulanmas\u0131na devam olunan m\u00fclga 1086 Say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Usul\u00fc Muhakemeleri Kanunu’nun 4. maddesi, 428. maddesi, 438. maddesinin yedi, sekiz ve dokuzuncu f\u0131kralar\u0131 ile 439. maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131; 4721 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 4. maddesi, 6. maddesi, 179. maddesi, 202. maddesi; 743 Say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Kanunu Medenisi’nin 152. maddesi, 153. maddesi, 170. maddesi, 186. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131, 189. maddesi, 818 Say\u0131l\u0131 Bor\u00e7lar Kanunu’nun 146. maddesi, 544. maddesi, 6098 Say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Bor\u00e7lar Kanunu’nun 50 ve 51. maddesi, 646. maddesi; Yarg\u0131tay \u0130\u00e7tihad\u0131 Birle\u015ftirme B\u00fcy\u00fck Genel Kurulunun 09.05.1960 tarih ve 1960\/21 Esas, 1960\/9 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131.<\/p>\n

3. De\u011ferlendirme<\/p>\n

1. Mahkemelerin nihai kararlar\u0131n\u0131n bozulmas\u0131 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un ge\u00e7ici 3. maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131 atf\u0131yla uygulanmas\u0131na devam olunan m\u00fclga 1086 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 428. maddesiyle 439. maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda yer alan sebeplerden birinin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 h\u00e2linde m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr.<\/p>\n

2.Temyizen incelenen Mahkeme karar\u0131nda ve karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde hukuk kurallar\u0131n\u0131n somut olaya uygulanmas\u0131nda bir isabetsizlik bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bozmaya uyulmakla kar\u015f\u0131 taraf yarar\u0131na kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f hak durumunu olu\u015fturan y\u00f6nlerin ve bozma kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalarak kesinle\u015fen y\u00f6nlerin yeniden incelenmesinin hukuken m\u00fcmk\u00fcn bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131na g\u00f6re davac\u0131lar vekili ve daval\u0131lar vekilinin a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki paragraflar\u0131n kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

3.Daval\u0131lar vekilinin tasfiyeye konu 3161 ada 166 parsel 7, 27 ve 28 numaral\u0131 ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcmlere y\u00f6nelik temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n incelemesinde; tasfiye konusu ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n mal rejiminin sona erdi\u011fi murisin \u00f6l\u00fcm tarihi olan 09.01.2005 tarihinden alt\u0131 y\u0131ldan fazla bir s\u00fcre \u00f6nce, 26.10.1998 tarihinde sat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, mal rejimin sona erdi\u011fi tarihte mevcut olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. O halde, Mahkemece mal rejiminin sona erdi\u011fi s\u0131rada mevcut olan mallar\u0131n tasfiye edilmesi gerekti\u011finden, i\u015fbu \u00fc\u00e7 ta\u015f\u0131nmaz y\u00f6n\u00fcnden davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesi gerekirken, tasfiyeye dahil edilerek alaca\u011f\u0131n belirlenmesi hatal\u0131 olmu\u015f, bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

4. Davac\u0131lar vekilinin katk\u0131 pay\u0131 oran\u0131na y\u00f6nelik temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n incelemesinde; Mahkemece, davac\u0131lar\u0131n murisi ve daval\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n murisinin e\u015fit gelire sahip oldu\u011fu kabul edilerek, taraflar\u0131n ki\u015fisel harcamalar\u0131 ve erke\u011fin ia\u015fe y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc de g\u00f6zetilerek erke\u011fin % 33,33, kad\u0131n\u0131n % 66,66 olarak belirlenen katk\u0131 pay\u0131 oran\u0131na g\u00f6re alacak belirlenmi\u015f ise de, belirlenen katk\u0131 pay\u0131 oran\u0131n dosya kapsam\u0131 ile \u00f6rt\u00fc\u015fmemektedir. \u015e\u00f6yle ki, Mahkemece davac\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n murisi erkek e\u015f ile daval\u0131lar\u0131n murisi kad\u0131n e\u015fin gelirlerinin e\u015fit kabul edilmesi yerinde ise de, murislerin evlendiklerinde kad\u0131n e\u015fin ilk e\u015finden olma \u00fc\u00e7 \u00e7ocu\u011funun oldu\u011fu, erkek e\u015fin ise \u00e7ocu\u011funun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, e\u015flerin evlendikten sonra ortak \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131n da olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, kad\u0131n e\u015fin ilk e\u015finden olan \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131n da kad\u0131nla birlikte kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmakla, kad\u0131n e\u015fin \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 da g\u00f6zetilerek ki\u015fisel harcama oran\u0131n\u0131n daha y\u00fcksek olmas\u0131 gerekirken yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde kabul edilmesi hatal\u0131 olmu\u015ftur. O halde, Mahkemece, kad\u0131n e\u015fin ilk e\u015finden \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131n da oldu\u011fu g\u00f6zetilerek ki\u015fisel harcama oran\u0131n belirlenerek e\u015flerin katk\u0131 pay\u0131 oran\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesi gerekirken, kad\u0131n e\u015fin ki\u015fisel harcama oran\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck belirlenmesi hatal\u0131 olmu\u015f, bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

5.Taraf vekillerinin ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n de\u011ferine y\u00f6nelik temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n incelemesinde; Mahkemece, dava katk\u0131 pay\u0131 alaca\u011f\u0131 istemine ili\u015fkin oldu\u011fundan ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n dava tarihindeki de\u011ferinin esas al\u0131narak alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesi yerinde ise de, ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n de\u011ferinin belirleme y\u00f6ntemi yetersizdir. \u015e\u00f6yle ki, ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n ke\u015ffin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 23.05.2015 tarihinde belirlenen de\u011ferlerine g\u00f6re, T\u00dc\u0130K ve TEFE verileri kullan\u0131larak ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 13.08.2010 tarihindeki de\u011ferinin hesap raporunda belirlendi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. O halde, Mahkemece, tasfiyeye dahil edilecek ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n dava tarihindeki rayi\u00e7 (s\u00fcr\u00fcm) de\u011ferlerinin, konusunda uzman bilirki\u015fi taraf\u0131ndan yerinde inceleme yap\u0131larak belirlenmesi gerekirken, yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde yap\u0131lan de\u011fer tespitine g\u00f6re alaca\u011f\u0131n belirlenmesi hatal\u0131 olmu\u015f, bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

6. Daval\u0131lar vekilinin miras pay oranlar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n incelemesinde; dava, \u00f6l\u00fcme ba\u011fl\u0131 mal rejiminin tasfiyesi ile alacak iste\u011fine ili\u015fkin olup davac\u0131lar temyize konu davay\u0131 terekenin alacakl\u0131s\u0131 s\u0131fat\u0131yla a\u00e7m\u0131\u015f ise de, davac\u0131lar da dahil daval\u0131lar\u0131n murisi, buna ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak daval\u0131lar\u0131n da ortak mirasb\u0131rakan …in miras\u00e7\u0131s\u0131d\u0131rlar ve tereke bor\u00e7lar\u0131ndan kanuni d\u00fczenlemeler \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde hepsi de sorumludurlar. T\u00fcm bu a\u00e7\u0131klamalar nedeniyle, davac\u0131lar\u0131n mal rejiminin tasfiyesi nedeniyle talep etti\u011fi ve terekeye ait alacak say\u0131lan alacak miktar\u0131ndan, daval\u0131lar\u0131n da ayn\u0131 zamanda muris …in miras\u00e7\u0131s\u0131 olmalar\u0131 nedeniyle hak sahibidirler. Buna g\u00f6re, somut olayda h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131nan tereke alaca\u011f\u0131ndan daval\u0131lar\u0131n da miras pay\u0131 oran\u0131nda hak sahibi oldu\u011fu da g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurularak daval\u0131lar\u0131n miras pay\u0131 oran\u0131nda sorumlu oldu\u011fu miktar\u0131n h\u00fck\u00fcm f\u0131kras\u0131nda g\u00f6sterilmesi gerekirken bu husus g\u00f6z ard\u0131 edilerek yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde karar verilmesi do\u011fru olmam\u0131\u015f, bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

SONU\u00c7 : A\u00e7\u0131klanan sebeplerle;<\/p>\n

1. Taraf vekillerinin bozma kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n

2. Taraf vekillerinin (3,4,5, ve 6) numaral\u0131 paragraflarda a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fcyle h\u00fckm\u00fcn BOZULMASINA,<\/p>\n

Pe\u015fin al\u0131nan temyiz karar harc\u0131n\u0131n istek halinde temyiz edenlere iadesine,<\/p>\n

Dosyan\u0131n Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmesine,<\/p>\n

Karar\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren 15 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde karar d\u00fczeltme yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere, 29.11.2023 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n

Kazanc\u0131 Elektronik ve Bas\u0131l\u0131 Yay. A.\u015e.ne ait Kazanc\u0131 Hukuk Otomasyon veritaban\u0131ndan al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u00a9 T\u00fcm Haklar\u0131 Sakl\u0131d\u0131r<\/p>\n

\u200bM\u00fcmk\u00fcn Olmamas\u0131 Halinde Kat\u0131lma Alaca\u011f\u0131 Talebi\/Tasfiye Konusu Ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n Mal Rejiminin Sona Erdi\u011fi Murisin \u00d6l\u00fcm Tarihinden Alt\u0131 Y\u0131ldan Fazla Bir S\u00fcre \u00d6nce 26.10.1998 Tarihinde Sat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 Mal Rejimin Sona Erdi\u011fi Tarihte Mevcut Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 Anla\u015f\u0131lmakla Mahkemece Mal Rejiminin Sona Erdi\u011fi S\u0131rada Mevcut Olan Mallar\u0131n Tasfiye Edilmesi Gerekti\u011finden \u0130\u015fbu \u00dc\u00e7 Ta\u015f\u0131nmaz Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden Davan\u0131n Reddine Karar Verilmesi Gerekirken Tasfiyeye Dahil Edilerek Alaca\u011f\u0131n Belirlenmesinin Hatal\u0131 Oldu\u011fu\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n

Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

T.C. YARGITAY 2. HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130 E. 2023\/2422 K. 2023\/5741 T. 29.11.2023 TAPU \u0130PTAL\u0130 VE TESC\u0130L ( M\u00fcmk\u00fcn Olmamas\u0131 Halinde Kat\u0131lma Alaca\u011f\u0131 Talebi\/Tasfiye Konusu Ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n Mal Rejiminin Sona Erdi\u011fi Murisin \u00d6l\u00fcm Tarihinden Alt\u0131 Y\u0131ldan Fazla Bir S\u00fcre \u00d6nce 26.10.1998 Tarihinde Sat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 Mal Rejimin Sona Erdi\u011fi Tarihte Mevcut Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 Anla\u015f\u0131lmakla Mahkemece Mal Rejiminin Sona Erdi\u011fi S\u0131rada Mevcut Olan Mallar\u0131n Tasfiye Edilmesi Gerekti\u011finden \u0130\u015fbu \u00dc\u00e7 Ta\u015f\u0131nmaz Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden Davan\u0131n Reddine Karar Verilmesi Gerekirken Tasfiyeye Dahil Edilerek Alaca\u011f\u0131n Belirlenmesinin Hatal\u0131 Oldu\u011fu ) KATKI PAYI ( Mahkemece Davac\u0131lar\u0131n Murisi ve Daval\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n Murisinin E\u015fit Gelire Sahip Oldu\u011fu Kabul Edilerek Taraflar\u0131n Ki\u015fisel Harcamalar\u0131 ve Erke\u011fin \u0130a\u015fe Y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc de G\u00f6zetilerek Erke\u011fin % 33,33, Kad\u0131n\u0131n % 66,66 Olarak Belirlenen Katk\u0131 Pay\u0131 Oran\u0131na G\u00f6re Alacak Belirlenmi\u015f \u0130se de Belirlenen Katk\u0131 Pay\u0131 Oran\u0131n Dosya Kapsam\u0131 \u0130le \u00d6rt\u00fc\u015fmedi\u011fi\/Murislerin Evlendiklerinde Kad\u0131n E\u015fin \u0130lk E\u015finden Olma \u00dc\u00e7 \u00c7ocu\u011funun Oldu\u011fu Erkek E\u015fin \u0130se \u00c7ocu\u011funun Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 E\u015flerin Evlendikten Sonra Ortak \u00c7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131n da Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kad\u0131n E\u015fin \u0130lk E\u015finden Olan \u00c7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131n da Kad\u0131nla Birlikte Kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 Anla\u015f\u0131lmakla Kad\u0131n E\u015fin \u00c7ocuklar\u0131 da G\u00f6zetilerek Ki\u015fisel Harcama Oran\u0131n\u0131n Daha Y\u00fcksek Olmas\u0131 Gerekti\u011fi ) K\u0130\u015e\u0130SEL HARCAMA ORANI ( Murislerin Evlendiklerinde Kad\u0131n E\u015fin \u0130lk E\u015finden Olma \u00dc\u00e7 \u00c7ocu\u011funun Oldu\u011fu Erkek E\u015fin \u0130se \u00c7ocu\u011funun Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 E\u015flerin Evlendikten Sonra Ortak \u00c7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131n da Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kad\u0131n E\u015fin \u0130lk E\u015finden …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27,535],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-19927","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber","category-uncategorized-tr"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nTA\u015eINMAZLARIN MAL REJ\u0130M\u0130N\u0130N SONA ERD\u0130\u011e\u0130 MUR\u0130S\u0130N \u00d6L\u00dcM TAR\u0130H\u0130NDEN \u00d6NCE SATILMASI - \u00d6L\u00dcME BA\u011eLI MAL REJ\u0130M\u0130N\u0130N TASF\u0130YES\u0130 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/tasinmazlarin-mal-rejiminin-sona-erdigi-murisin-olum-tarihinden-once-satilmasi-olume-bagli-mal-rejiminin-tasfiyesi\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"de_DE\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"TA\u015eINMAZLARIN MAL REJ\u0130M\u0130N\u0130N SONA ERD\u0130\u011e\u0130 MUR\u0130S\u0130N \u00d6L\u00dcM TAR\u0130H\u0130NDEN \u00d6NCE SATILMASI - \u00d6L\u00dcME BA\u011eLI MAL REJ\u0130M\u0130N\u0130N TASF\u0130YES\u0130\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"T.C. YARGITAY 2. HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130 E. 2023\/2422 K. 2023\/5741 T. 29.11.2023 TAPU \u0130PTAL\u0130 VE TESC\u0130L ( M\u00fcmk\u00fcn Olmamas\u0131 Halinde Kat\u0131lma Alaca\u011f\u0131 Talebi\/Tasfiye Konusu Ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n Mal Rejiminin Sona Erdi\u011fi Murisin \u00d6l\u00fcm Tarihinden Alt\u0131 Y\u0131ldan Fazla Bir S\u00fcre \u00d6nce 26.10.1998 Tarihinde Sat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 Mal Rejimin Sona Erdi\u011fi Tarihte Mevcut Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 Anla\u015f\u0131lmakla Mahkemece Mal Rejiminin Sona Erdi\u011fi S\u0131rada Mevcut Olan Mallar\u0131n Tasfiye Edilmesi Gerekti\u011finden \u0130\u015fbu \u00dc\u00e7 Ta\u015f\u0131nmaz Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden Davan\u0131n Reddine Karar Verilmesi Gerekirken Tasfiyeye Dahil Edilerek Alaca\u011f\u0131n Belirlenmesinin Hatal\u0131 Oldu\u011fu ) KATKI PAYI ( Mahkemece Davac\u0131lar\u0131n Murisi ve Daval\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n Murisinin E\u015fit Gelire Sahip Oldu\u011fu Kabul Edilerek Taraflar\u0131n Ki\u015fisel Harcamalar\u0131 ve Erke\u011fin \u0130a\u015fe Y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc de G\u00f6zetilerek Erke\u011fin % 33,33, Kad\u0131n\u0131n % 66,66 Olarak Belirlenen Katk\u0131 Pay\u0131 Oran\u0131na G\u00f6re Alacak Belirlenmi\u015f \u0130se de Belirlenen Katk\u0131 Pay\u0131 Oran\u0131n Dosya Kapsam\u0131 \u0130le \u00d6rt\u00fc\u015fmedi\u011fi\/Murislerin Evlendiklerinde Kad\u0131n E\u015fin \u0130lk E\u015finden Olma \u00dc\u00e7 \u00c7ocu\u011funun Oldu\u011fu Erkek E\u015fin \u0130se \u00c7ocu\u011funun Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 E\u015flerin Evlendikten Sonra Ortak \u00c7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131n da Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kad\u0131n E\u015fin \u0130lk E\u015finden Olan \u00c7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131n da Kad\u0131nla Birlikte Kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 Anla\u015f\u0131lmakla Kad\u0131n E\u015fin \u00c7ocuklar\u0131 da G\u00f6zetilerek Ki\u015fisel Harcama Oran\u0131n\u0131n Daha Y\u00fcksek Olmas\u0131 Gerekti\u011fi ) K\u0130\u015e\u0130SEL HARCAMA ORANI ( Murislerin Evlendiklerinde Kad\u0131n E\u015fin \u0130lk E\u015finden Olma \u00dc\u00e7 \u00c7ocu\u011funun Oldu\u011fu Erkek E\u015fin \u0130se \u00c7ocu\u011funun Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 E\u015flerin Evlendikten Sonra Ortak \u00c7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131n da Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kad\u0131n E\u015fin \u0130lk E\u015finden …\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/tasinmazlarin-mal-rejiminin-sona-erdigi-murisin-olum-tarihinden-once-satilmasi-olume-bagli-mal-rejiminin-tasfiyesi\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-12-09T09:20:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Gesch\u00e4tzte Lesezeit\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"24\u00a0Minuten\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/tasinmazlarin-mal-rejiminin-sona-erdigi-murisin-olum-tarihinden-once-satilmasi-olume-bagli-mal-rejiminin-tasfiyesi\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/tasinmazlarin-mal-rejiminin-sona-erdigi-murisin-olum-tarihinden-once-satilmasi-olume-bagli-mal-rejiminin-tasfiyesi\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"\",\"@id\":\"\"},\"headline\":\"TA\u015eINMAZLARIN MAL REJ\u0130M\u0130N\u0130N SONA ERD\u0130\u011e\u0130 MUR\u0130S\u0130N \u00d6L\u00dcM TAR\u0130H\u0130NDEN \u00d6NCE SATILMASI – \u00d6L\u00dcME BA\u011eLI MAL REJ\u0130M\u0130N\u0130N TASF\u0130YES\u0130\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-12-09T09:20:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/tasinmazlarin-mal-rejiminin-sona-erdigi-murisin-olum-tarihinden-once-satilmasi-olume-bagli-mal-rejiminin-tasfiyesi\/\"},\"wordCount\":4939,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Hukuki Haberler\",\"Uncategorized\"],\"inLanguage\":\"de\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/tasinmazlarin-mal-rejiminin-sona-erdigi-murisin-olum-tarihinden-once-satilmasi-olume-bagli-mal-rejiminin-tasfiyesi\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/tasinmazlarin-mal-rejiminin-sona-erdigi-murisin-olum-tarihinden-once-satilmasi-olume-bagli-mal-rejiminin-tasfiyesi\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/tasinmazlarin-mal-rejiminin-sona-erdigi-murisin-olum-tarihinden-once-satilmasi-olume-bagli-mal-rejiminin-tasfiyesi\/\",\"name\":\"TA\u015eINMAZLARIN MAL REJ\u0130M\u0130N\u0130N SONA ERD\u0130\u011e\u0130 MUR\u0130S\u0130N \u00d6L\u00dcM TAR\u0130H\u0130NDEN \u00d6NCE SATILMASI - \u00d6L\u00dcME BA\u011eLI MAL REJ\u0130M\u0130N\u0130N TASF\u0130YES\u0130 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2024-12-09T09:20:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/tasinmazlarin-mal-rejiminin-sona-erdigi-murisin-olum-tarihinden-once-satilmasi-olume-bagli-mal-rejiminin-tasfiyesi\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"de\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/tasinmazlarin-mal-rejiminin-sona-erdigi-murisin-olum-tarihinden-once-satilmasi-olume-bagli-mal-rejiminin-tasfiyesi\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/tasinmazlarin-mal-rejiminin-sona-erdigi-murisin-olum-tarihinden-once-satilmasi-olume-bagli-mal-rejiminin-tasfiyesi\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"TA\u015eINMAZLARIN MAL REJ\u0130M\u0130N\u0130N SONA ERD\u0130\u011e\u0130 MUR\u0130S\u0130N \u00d6L\u00dcM TAR\u0130H\u0130NDEN \u00d6NCE SATILMASI – \u00d6L\u00dcME BA\u011eLI MAL REJ\u0130M\u0130N\u0130N TASF\u0130YES\u0130\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"description\":\"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"de\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"de\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"width\":1080,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"TA\u015eINMAZLARIN MAL REJ\u0130M\u0130N\u0130N SONA ERD\u0130\u011e\u0130 MUR\u0130S\u0130N \u00d6L\u00dcM TAR\u0130H\u0130NDEN \u00d6NCE SATILMASI - \u00d6L\u00dcME BA\u011eLI MAL REJ\u0130M\u0130N\u0130N TASF\u0130YES\u0130 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/tasinmazlarin-mal-rejiminin-sona-erdigi-murisin-olum-tarihinden-once-satilmasi-olume-bagli-mal-rejiminin-tasfiyesi\/","og_locale":"de_DE","og_type":"article","og_title":"TA\u015eINMAZLARIN MAL REJ\u0130M\u0130N\u0130N SONA ERD\u0130\u011e\u0130 MUR\u0130S\u0130N \u00d6L\u00dcM TAR\u0130H\u0130NDEN \u00d6NCE SATILMASI - \u00d6L\u00dcME BA\u011eLI MAL REJ\u0130M\u0130N\u0130N TASF\u0130YES\u0130","og_description":"T.C. YARGITAY 2. HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130 E. 2023\/2422 K. 2023\/5741 T. 29.11.2023 TAPU \u0130PTAL\u0130 VE TESC\u0130L ( M\u00fcmk\u00fcn Olmamas\u0131 Halinde Kat\u0131lma Alaca\u011f\u0131 Talebi\/Tasfiye Konusu Ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n Mal Rejiminin Sona Erdi\u011fi Murisin \u00d6l\u00fcm Tarihinden Alt\u0131 Y\u0131ldan Fazla Bir S\u00fcre \u00d6nce 26.10.1998 Tarihinde Sat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 Mal Rejimin Sona Erdi\u011fi Tarihte Mevcut Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 Anla\u015f\u0131lmakla Mahkemece Mal Rejiminin Sona Erdi\u011fi S\u0131rada Mevcut Olan Mallar\u0131n Tasfiye Edilmesi Gerekti\u011finden \u0130\u015fbu \u00dc\u00e7 Ta\u015f\u0131nmaz Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden Davan\u0131n Reddine Karar Verilmesi Gerekirken Tasfiyeye Dahil Edilerek Alaca\u011f\u0131n Belirlenmesinin Hatal\u0131 Oldu\u011fu ) KATKI PAYI ( Mahkemece Davac\u0131lar\u0131n Murisi ve Daval\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n Murisinin E\u015fit Gelire Sahip Oldu\u011fu Kabul Edilerek Taraflar\u0131n Ki\u015fisel Harcamalar\u0131 ve Erke\u011fin \u0130a\u015fe Y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc de G\u00f6zetilerek Erke\u011fin % 33,33, Kad\u0131n\u0131n % 66,66 Olarak Belirlenen Katk\u0131 Pay\u0131 Oran\u0131na G\u00f6re Alacak Belirlenmi\u015f \u0130se de Belirlenen Katk\u0131 Pay\u0131 Oran\u0131n Dosya Kapsam\u0131 \u0130le \u00d6rt\u00fc\u015fmedi\u011fi\/Murislerin Evlendiklerinde Kad\u0131n E\u015fin \u0130lk E\u015finden Olma \u00dc\u00e7 \u00c7ocu\u011funun Oldu\u011fu Erkek E\u015fin \u0130se \u00c7ocu\u011funun Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 E\u015flerin Evlendikten Sonra Ortak \u00c7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131n da Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kad\u0131n E\u015fin \u0130lk E\u015finden Olan \u00c7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131n da Kad\u0131nla Birlikte Kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 Anla\u015f\u0131lmakla Kad\u0131n E\u015fin \u00c7ocuklar\u0131 da G\u00f6zetilerek Ki\u015fisel Harcama Oran\u0131n\u0131n Daha Y\u00fcksek Olmas\u0131 Gerekti\u011fi ) K\u0130\u015e\u0130SEL HARCAMA ORANI ( Murislerin Evlendiklerinde Kad\u0131n E\u015fin \u0130lk E\u015finden Olma \u00dc\u00e7 \u00c7ocu\u011funun Oldu\u011fu Erkek E\u015fin \u0130se \u00c7ocu\u011funun Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 E\u015flerin Evlendikten Sonra Ortak \u00c7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131n da Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kad\u0131n E\u015fin \u0130lk E\u015finden …","og_url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/tasinmazlarin-mal-rejiminin-sona-erdigi-murisin-olum-tarihinden-once-satilmasi-olume-bagli-mal-rejiminin-tasfiyesi\/","og_site_name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","article_published_time":"2024-12-09T09:20:00+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Gesch\u00e4tzte Lesezeit":"24\u00a0Minuten"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/tasinmazlarin-mal-rejiminin-sona-erdigi-murisin-olum-tarihinden-once-satilmasi-olume-bagli-mal-rejiminin-tasfiyesi\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/tasinmazlarin-mal-rejiminin-sona-erdigi-murisin-olum-tarihinden-once-satilmasi-olume-bagli-mal-rejiminin-tasfiyesi\/"},"author":{"name":"","@id":""},"headline":"TA\u015eINMAZLARIN MAL REJ\u0130M\u0130N\u0130N SONA ERD\u0130\u011e\u0130 MUR\u0130S\u0130N \u00d6L\u00dcM TAR\u0130H\u0130NDEN \u00d6NCE SATILMASI – \u00d6L\u00dcME BA\u011eLI MAL REJ\u0130M\u0130N\u0130N TASF\u0130YES\u0130","datePublished":"2024-12-09T09:20:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/tasinmazlarin-mal-rejiminin-sona-erdigi-murisin-olum-tarihinden-once-satilmasi-olume-bagli-mal-rejiminin-tasfiyesi\/"},"wordCount":4939,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Hukuki Haberler","Uncategorized"],"inLanguage":"de","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/tasinmazlarin-mal-rejiminin-sona-erdigi-murisin-olum-tarihinden-once-satilmasi-olume-bagli-mal-rejiminin-tasfiyesi\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/tasinmazlarin-mal-rejiminin-sona-erdigi-murisin-olum-tarihinden-once-satilmasi-olume-bagli-mal-rejiminin-tasfiyesi\/","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/tasinmazlarin-mal-rejiminin-sona-erdigi-murisin-olum-tarihinden-once-satilmasi-olume-bagli-mal-rejiminin-tasfiyesi\/","name":"TA\u015eINMAZLARIN MAL REJ\u0130M\u0130N\u0130N SONA ERD\u0130\u011e\u0130 MUR\u0130S\u0130N \u00d6L\u00dcM TAR\u0130H\u0130NDEN \u00d6NCE SATILMASI - \u00d6L\u00dcME BA\u011eLI MAL REJ\u0130M\u0130N\u0130N TASF\u0130YES\u0130 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website"},"datePublished":"2024-12-09T09:20:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/tasinmazlarin-mal-rejiminin-sona-erdigi-murisin-olum-tarihinden-once-satilmasi-olume-bagli-mal-rejiminin-tasfiyesi\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"de","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/tasinmazlarin-mal-rejiminin-sona-erdigi-murisin-olum-tarihinden-once-satilmasi-olume-bagli-mal-rejiminin-tasfiyesi\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/tasinmazlarin-mal-rejiminin-sona-erdigi-murisin-olum-tarihinden-once-satilmasi-olume-bagli-mal-rejiminin-tasfiyesi\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"TA\u015eINMAZLARIN MAL REJ\u0130M\u0130N\u0130N SONA ERD\u0130\u011e\u0130 MUR\u0130S\u0130N \u00d6L\u00dcM TAR\u0130H\u0130NDEN \u00d6NCE SATILMASI – \u00d6L\u00dcME BA\u011eLI MAL REJ\u0130M\u0130N\u0130N TASF\u0130YES\u0130"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","description":"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"de"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"de","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","width":1080,"height":1080,"caption":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19927","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=19927"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19927\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=19927"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=19927"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=19927"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}