T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u015e\u00dcKR\u00dc KOCABA\u015e BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/12353)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 18\/7\/2024<\/p>\n
R.G. Tarih ve Say\u0131: 3\/12\/2024-32741<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
\u015eeyda Nur \u00dcN<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
\u015e\u00fckr\u00fc KOCABA\u015e<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Do\u011fan BEK\u0130RO\u011eLU<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, haz\u0131rlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 doktora \u00f6devinde meslek s\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131 if\u015fa etti\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi feshedilen ba\u015fvurucunun ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucu 1988 do\u011fumlu olup 2014 y\u0131l\u0131ndan i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin feshedildi\u011fi tarihe kadar H.A.O. San. ve Tic. A.\u015e.’nin (\u0130\u015fveren\/\u015eirket) Kocaeli \u015fubesinde belirsiz s\u00fcreli i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesiyle \u00e7al\u0131\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu ayr\u0131ca Y\u0131ld\u0131z Teknik \u00dcniversitesi Makine M\u00fchendisli\u011fi B\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde doktora e\u011fitimine devam etmektedir.<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fvurucu; \u015eirkette bak\u0131m m\u00fchendisi olarak g\u00f6rev yapmakta iken i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi 13\/1\/2017 tarihinde “\u00f6zel transport\u00f6rler isimli doktora dersinin \u00f6devinde meslek s\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131 ortaya att\u0131\u011f\u0131” gerek\u00e7esiyle ve hakl\u0131 nedenle feshedilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu “doktora \u00f6devinde herkese a\u00e7\u0131k makineler \u00fczerinde bir \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, \u00f6devin en ge\u00e7 Haziran 2016 tarihinde teslim edildi\u011fini, bilgisayar\u0131n\u0131n ele ge\u00e7irilerek bu \u00f6devin elde edildi\u011fini ve kendisine kar\u015f\u0131 6-7 ay sonra kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, \u00f6devde meslek s\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131 ortaya atacak bir bilgi bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131” belirterek feshin haks\u0131z ve ge\u00e7ersiz oldu\u011fu iddias\u0131yla i\u015fe iade talepli tespit davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
4. Davan\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc Kocaeli 3. \u0130\u015f Mahkemesi (\u0130\u015f Mahkemesi) 26\/7\/2018 tarihinde davan\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile feshin ge\u00e7ersizli\u011fine ve ba\u015fvurucunun i\u015fe iadesine karar vermi\u015ftir. Gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“…Davac\u0131n\u0131n 01.12.2014-13.01.2017 tarihleri aras\u0131nda daval\u0131 i\u015fyerinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin daval\u0131 i\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan daval\u0131 \u015firketin gizli bilgilerinin tez \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131nda kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle feshedildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. <\/p>\n
Bilirki\u015fi raporundaki tespitlerden de anla\u015f\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere, davac\u0131n\u0131n d\u00f6nem \u00f6devinde belirtti\u011fi iyile\u015ftirme \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131 teknolojik kritiklik arz etmeyen, genel ge\u00e7er uygulamalar olup, akademik literat\u00fcrde kolayl\u0131kla bulunabilecek bilgi ve uygulamalard\u0131r. Davac\u0131 taraf\u00e7a yap\u0131lan \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma tez niteli\u011finde de\u011fil \u00f6dev niteli\u011findedir. Dosyaya sunulan belgelerden, dinlenen tan\u0131k anlat\u0131mlar\u0131ndan daval\u0131 i\u015fyerinde bulunan stajyerlerin dahi kendi \u00f6dev ve \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131nda i\u015fyerine ili\u015fkin verileri kulland\u0131klar\u0131, benzer bilgilerin daha \u00f6nce de i\u015fyerinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlarca ayn\u0131 ama\u00e7la kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, ancak bu \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Daval\u0131 i\u015fveren i\u015fyerinde e\u015fitlik ilkesine ve feshin son \u00e7are olma ilkesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 davranarak davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015f aktini feshetmi\u015ftir. Daval\u0131 i\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan fesih haks\u0131z ve ge\u00e7ersiz bulunmu\u015ftur. Bu nedenlerle feshin ge\u00e7ersizli\u011fine, davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015fine iadesine karar verilmi\u015f, a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm olu\u015fturulmu\u015ftur.”<\/p>\n
5. \u0130\u015fverenin istinaf talebinde bulunmas\u0131 \u00fczerine dosyay\u0131 inceleyen \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 24. Hukuk Dairesi (B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi) 30\/1\/2020 tarihinde \u0130\u015f Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ve davan\u0131n reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. Gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131nda B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi, ba\u015fvurucunun imzalad\u0131\u011f\u0131 17\/6\/2016 tarihli \u00c7al\u0131\u015fan Bilgi G\u00fcvenli\u011fi Taahh\u00fctnamesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 hareket etti\u011fi, ba\u015fvurucunun eyleminin hakl\u0131 neden a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131nda olmasa da i\u015fverenle aras\u0131ndaki g\u00fcven ili\u015fkisini zedeledi\u011fi, bu nedenle feshin ge\u00e7erli nedene dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 kanaatine ula\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
6. Ba\u015fvurucu, nihai karar\u0131 10\/3\/2020 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra 23\/3\/2020 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
7. Ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
8. \u00d6deme g\u00fcc\u00fcnden yoksun oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurucunun a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmayan adli yard\u0131m talebinin kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
A. \u0130fade \u00d6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fvurucu; ki\u015fisel bilgisayar\u0131n\u0131n ele ge\u00e7irilerek i\u00e7inden doktora \u00f6devinin al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve insan kaynaklar\u0131 birimine \u015fik\u00e2yet edildi\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir. Doktora \u00f6devinin ilk 10 sayfas\u0131nda \u015eirket ile ilgili herhangi bir bilgi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, 10-17. sayfalar aras\u0131nda kendisinin yo\u011fun u\u011fra\u015flar\u0131 sonucu \u015eirkete kazand\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir k\u0131s\u0131m i\u015flemin bulundu\u011funu, 18. sayfada kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 resmi internet ortam\u0131ndan ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, 21. sayfadaki son resmin ise ta\u015feron firman\u0131n yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma oldu\u011funu belirtmi\u015ftir. Devam\u0131nda; \u00f6devde kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 bilgilerin bilirki\u015fi raporunda da belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere meslek s\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131 ortaya at\u0131c\u0131 bir bilgi mahiyetinde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve herkesin rahatl\u0131kla eri\u015febilece\u011fi bilgiler oldu\u011funu belirtmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n yaln\u0131zca imzalanm\u0131\u015f bir taahh\u00fctnameye dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve ba\u015fkaca hi\u00e7bir gerek\u00e7e i\u00e7ermedi\u011fini ifade etmi\u015ftir. Nitekim s\u00f6z konusu taahh\u00fctnamenin \u00f6dev tesliminden sonra imzaland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, akademik takvimden de anla\u015f\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere \u00f6devlerin teslimi ve not giri\u015flerine ili\u015fkin son tarihin 14\/6\/2016 oldu\u011funu ancak taahh\u00fctnamenin 17\/6\/2016 tarihinde imzaland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve bu h\u00e2liyle mahkeme gerek\u00e7esinin fesih i\u00e7in yeterli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
10. Ba\u015fvurucunun iddialar\u0131n\u0131n doktora \u00f6devi nedeniyle i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin feshedilmesine ve a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015fe iade davas\u0131n\u0131n reddedilmesine ili\u015fkin i\u015flemler b\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcne y\u00f6nelik oldu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Bu kapsamda i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin feshinin temeli ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne dayanmaktad\u0131r. Anayasa Mahkemesi her zaman ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn demokratik bir toplumun zorunlu temellerinden oldu\u011funu, toplumun ilerlemesi ve her bireyin geli\u015fmesi i\u00e7in gerekli temel \u015fartlardan birini olu\u015fturdu\u011funu ifade etmi\u015ftir (Mehmet Ali Ayd\u0131n [GK], B. No: 2013\/9343, 4\/6\/2015, \u00a7 69; Bekir Co\u015fkun [GK], B. No: 2014\/12151, 4\/6\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 34-36). Anayasa’n\u0131n 26. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131, ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne i\u00e7erik bak\u0131m\u0131ndan bir s\u0131n\u0131rlama getirmedi\u011fi ve siyasi, sanatsal, bilimsel, akademik veya ticari d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnce ve kanaat a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131 gibi her t\u00fcrl\u00fc ifadeyi kapsam\u0131na ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 h\u00e2lde (Erg\u00fcn Poyraz (2) [GK], B. No: 2013\/8503, 27\/10\/2015, \u00a7 37; \u00d6nder Bal\u0131k\u00e7\u0131, B. No: 2014\/6009, 15\/2\/2017, \u00a7 40) ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn \u00f6zel bir t\u00fcr\u00fc olan bilim ve sanat \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc Anayasa’n\u0131n 27. maddesinde \u00f6zel olarak korunmu\u015ftur. Eldeki mevcut ba\u015fvurunun da Anayasa’n\u0131n 27. maddesinde koruma alt\u0131nda bulunan bilim \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn farkl\u0131 bir g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fc olan akademik \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerle yak\u0131ndan ilgisi bulunmaktad\u0131r. Nitekim bir doktora \u00f6\u011frencisinin ara\u015ft\u0131rma yapmas\u0131n\u0131n bulgular\u0131n\u0131, fikir ve g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerini \u00f6dev bi\u00e7iminde dahi olsa sunmas\u0131n\u0131n akademik \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn bir par\u00e7as\u0131 oldu\u011funda ku\u015fku yoktur.<\/p>\n
11. Bu kapsamda devletten, ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn korunmas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckleri kapsam\u0131nda ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc kullanmak isteyenlerin yaln\u0131zca \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015filer taraf\u0131ndan herhangi bir sald\u0131r\u0131ya u\u011frama endi\u015fesi ta\u015f\u0131madan bu hakk\u0131 kullanmalar\u0131n\u0131 temin etmesi de\u011fil ayn\u0131 zamanda i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerinin feshi gibi yap\u0131labilecek her t\u00fcrl\u00fc m\u00fcdahalelere kar\u015f\u0131 da \u00f6nlem almas\u0131 beklenir. Anayasa Mahkemesinin yapmas\u0131 gereken inceleme de devletin ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne y\u00f6nelik s\u00f6z konusu y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerini yerine getirip getirmedi\u011fine y\u00f6nelik olacakt\u0131r. Bu nedenle ba\u015fvuru ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
12. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
13. Devletin ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn korunmas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckleri \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde, uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klar\u0131n \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fcne ili\u015fkin yasal altyap\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fturulmas\u0131, uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klar\u0131n adil yarg\u0131lama gereklerine uygun ve usul y\u00f6n\u00fcnden g\u00fcvenceleri haiz bir yarg\u0131lama kapsam\u0131nda incelenmesi ve bu yarg\u0131lamalarda temel haklara ili\u015fkin anayasal g\u00fcvencelerin g\u00f6zetilip g\u00f6zetilmedi\u011finin denetlenmesi sorumlulu\u011fu vard\u0131r. Yine bireylerin temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerine \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015filerin m\u00fcdahalesinin \u00f6nlenmesi i\u00e7in gerekli \u00f6nlemlerin al\u0131nmas\u0131 ve mahkemelerce korunma sa\u011flanmas\u0131 da s\u00f6z konusu y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckler kapsam\u0131ndad\u0131r. Kamusal makamlarca gerekli yap\u0131sal \u00f6nlemler al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f olsa da uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k konusu davay\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fcten mahkemelerce verilen kararlarda \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015filerin m\u00fcdahalelerine kar\u015f\u0131 bireylere korunma imk\u00e2n\u0131 sa\u011flanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 durumlarda bu y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckler gere\u011fi gibi yerine getirilmemi\u015f olacakt\u0131r. Bu, kamusal makam olan mahkemeler arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla bireylerin hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerinin korunmas\u0131z b\u0131rak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anlam\u0131na gelecektir (benzer y\u00f6ndeki de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7in bkz. \u00d6m\u00fcr Kara ve Onursal \u00d6zbek, B. No: 2013\/4825, 24\/3\/2016, \u00a7\u00a7 47-49; Ayhan Deniz ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2019\/10975, 14\/6\/2023, \u00a7 36).<\/p>\n
14. Bu do\u011frultuda i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi kapsam\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan bireylerin Anayasa ile g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan haklar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik i\u015fverence ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen m\u00fcdahale iddias\u0131n\u0131 i\u00e7eren uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klar\u0131n karara ba\u011fland\u0131\u011f\u0131 davalarda yarg\u0131lama mercilerince s\u00f6z konusu g\u00fcvenceler g\u00f6zard\u0131 edilmemeli, i\u015fveren ve \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar aras\u0131ndaki \u00e7at\u0131\u015fan \u00e7\u0131karlar adil bi\u00e7imde dengelenmeli, ula\u015f\u0131lan sonu\u00e7 hakk\u0131nda h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulurken ilgili ve yeterli gerek\u00e7eler sunulmal\u0131d\u0131r (\u00d6m\u00fcr Kara ve Onursal \u00d6zbek, \u00a7 50; Kas\u0131m \u00c7ift\u00e7i ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2019\/33243, 4\/7\/2022, \u00a7 32; Ayhan Deniz ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 37).<\/p>\n
15. Somut olayda ba\u015fvurucunun i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi “doktora \u00f6devinde meslek s\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131 ortaya att\u0131\u011f\u0131” gerek\u00e7esiyle ve 22\/5\/2003 tarihli ve 4857 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130\u015f Kanunu’nun 25. maddesinin II-(e) bendine dayanarak hakl\u0131 nedenle feshedilmi\u015ftir. \u0130\u015f Mahkemesi feshin haks\u0131z ve ge\u00e7ersiz oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne ve ba\u015fvurucunun i\u015fe iadesine karar vermekle birlikte B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi feshin 4857 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 18. maddesi gere\u011fince ge\u00e7erli oldu\u011fu kanaatiyle davan\u0131n reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. O h\u00e2lde neticeten ba\u015fvurucunun i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi ge\u00e7erli nedenle fesih kapsam\u0131nda feshedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
16. 4857 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 18. maddesiyle, belirsiz s\u00fcreli i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerinin i\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan feshinde ge\u00e7erli bir neden bildirme zorunlulu\u011fu getirilmi\u015ftir. S\u00f6z konusu h\u00fck\u00fcmde ge\u00e7erli nedenlerin neler olabilece\u011fi madde metninde say\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u0130\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin feshi i\u00e7in ya i\u015f\u00e7inin yeterlili\u011fi ve davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131ndan kaynaklanan ya da i\u015fletmenin, i\u015fyerinin veya i\u015fin gereklerinden kaynaklanan ge\u00e7erli bir nedenin i\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan g\u00f6sterilmesi gerekmektedir. H\u00fckm\u00fcn gerek\u00e7esinde de i\u015fbu h\u00fck\u00fcm gere\u011fi i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin feshi i\u00e7in i\u015f\u00e7inin davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n i\u015f g\u00f6rme borcunu ciddi bi\u00e7imde olumsuz etkilemesi, i\u015f g\u00f6rme borcunu gerekti\u011fi bi\u00e7imde yerine getirmesine olanak vermemesi, i\u015f ili\u015fkisinin s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclmesinin i\u015fveren a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan makul \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fclerde beklenememesi gerekti\u011fi ifade edilmi\u015ftir. H\u00fckme g\u00f6re bir davran\u0131\u015f ancak i\u015fyerinde olumsuzluklara yol a\u00e7mas\u0131 h\u00e2linde ge\u00e7erli sebep say\u0131labilir. \u0130\u015f\u00e7inin davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n i\u015fyerindeki \u00fcretim ve i\u015f ili\u015fkisi s\u00fcrecine olumsuz bir etkisi yoksa bu davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131n i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin feshinde ge\u00e7erli bir neden olarak g\u00f6sterilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir (Kas\u0131m \u00c7ift\u00e7i ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 35; Ayhan Deniz ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 42 ).<\/p>\n
17. 4857 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 25\/II. maddesinde ahlak ve iyi niyet kurallar\u0131na uymayan h\u00e2ller s\u0131ralanm\u0131\u015f ve belirtilen durumlar ile benzerlerinin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 halinde i\u015fverenin hakl\u0131 fesih imk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131n oldu\u011fu a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Yine ayn\u0131 maddenin II-(e) bendinde, i\u015fverenin g\u00fcvenini k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanmak, h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k yapmak, i\u015fverenin meslek s\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131 ortaya atmak gibi do\u011fruluk ve ba\u011fl\u0131l\u0131\u011fa uymayan i\u015f\u00e7i davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n da i\u015fverene hakl\u0131 fesih imk\u00e2n\u0131 verdi\u011fi ifade edilmi\u015ftir. Bu kapsamda i\u015fverenin meslek s\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131 saklama y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc\u011f\u00fc i\u015fverene sadakat y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn bir par\u00e7as\u0131 olup meslek s\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131n ortaya at\u0131lmas\u0131 da bir fesih sebebidir. \u0130\u015fverene kar\u015f\u0131 sadakat y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc i\u00e7erisinde bulunan \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n d\u00fcr\u00fcstl\u00fck ve iyi niyet kurallar\u0131na uygun bir \u015fekilde hareket etmesi gerekir. Bulunduklar\u0131 konum itibar\u0131yla kimi zaman i\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan toplumla payla\u015f\u0131lmayan gizli birtak\u0131m bilgilere sahip olduklar\u0131 i\u00e7in \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc kullan\u0131rken \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fc davranmalar\u0131n\u0131 beklemek do\u011fald\u0131r. Bununla birlikte \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fc davranma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde ba\u015fvurucunun ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ile i\u015fverene kar\u015f\u0131 sadakat y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc aras\u0131nda adil bir dengenin g\u00f6zetilip g\u00f6zetilmedi\u011finin her somut olayda ve ikna edici gerek\u00e7elerle ortaya konulmas\u0131 gerekir (benzer y\u00f6nde de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7in bkz. Volkan \u00c7ak\u0131r, B. No: 2017\/35488, 7\/4\/2021, \u00a7 34).<\/p>\n
18. Somut olayda ba\u015fvurucunun doktora \u00f6devindeki bilgilerin meslek s\u0131rr\u0131 mahiyetinde olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na y\u00f6nelik ilk derece mahkemesince bilirki\u015fi incelemesi yapt\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve gerek inceleme sonucu olu\u015fturulan rapor gerekse de tan\u0131k anlat\u0131mlar\u0131 bir b\u00fct\u00fcn h\u00e2linde de\u011ferlendirilerek ba\u015fvurucunun doktora \u00f6devinde yer alan bilgilerin teknolojik kritiklik arz etmedi\u011fi ve genel ge\u00e7er bilgiler oldu\u011fu tespitiyle feshin ge\u00e7ersiz oldu\u011fu belirtilmi\u015ftir. \u0130lk derece mahkemesi ayr\u0131ca mevcut olayda feshin son \u00e7are olmas\u0131 ilkesine de uygun davran\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kanaatine varm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi ise yaln\u0131zca ba\u015fvurucunun imzalad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir taahh\u00fctnameyi gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6stererek feshin ge\u00e7erli oldu\u011fu tespitinde bulunmu\u015ftur. Bununla birlikte s\u00f6z konusu taahh\u00fctnamenin ne t\u00fcr h\u00fck\u00fcmler i\u00e7erdi\u011fi, ba\u015fvurucunun haz\u0131rlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 doktora \u00f6devi ile taahh\u00fctnamede yer alan hangi h\u00fckme ve ne \u015fekilde ayk\u0131r\u0131 davrand\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve bu h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin feshi hangi sebeplerle hakl\u0131 veya ge\u00e7erli k\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde herhangi bir tespit ve de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu kapsamda B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131nda i\u015f\u00e7iye somut olarak hangi s\u00f6zle\u015fme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn y\u00fcklendi\u011fi ve i\u015f\u00e7inin hangi davran\u0131\u015f\u0131 ile hangi somut s\u00f6zle\u015fme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ihlal etti\u011fi eksiksiz olarak tespit edilmemi\u015f; i\u015fverenin zarar g\u00f6ren i\u015fletme menfaatlerinin neler oldu\u011fu a\u00e7\u0131klanmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi, soyut ve genel bir gerek\u00e7e ile yaln\u0131zca ba\u015fvurucu taraf\u0131ndan taahh\u00fctnamenin imzalanm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131na dayanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
19. Kald\u0131 ki ba\u015fvurucu akademik takvimden de anla\u015f\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere \u00f6dev tesliminin ve not giri\u015flerinin son g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fcn 14\/6\/2016 oldu\u011funu, doktora \u00f6devini haz\u0131rlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 dersten b\u00fct\u00fcnlemeye kalmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve ders d\u00f6neminde ge\u00e7ti\u011fi, h\u00e2liyle \u00f6dev tesliminin 14\/6\/2016 tarihinden \u00f6nce ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fini ve bu kapsamda s\u00f6z konusu \u00f6dev ile 17\/6\/2016 tarihinde imzalanm\u0131\u015f bir taahh\u00fctnameye ayk\u0131r\u0131 davranmas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmesine kar\u015f\u0131n B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesinin s\u00f6z konusu hususlara ili\u015fkin de herhangi bir de\u011ferlendirme yapmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
20. Di\u011fer yandan ba\u015fvurucu tez niteli\u011finde olmay\u0131p herhangi bir \u015fekilde aleniyet kazand\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6sterilemeyen bir doktora \u00f6devinden dolay\u0131 olduk\u00e7a a\u011f\u0131r bir sonu\u00e7la kar\u015f\u0131la\u015fm\u0131\u015f ve i\u015fini kaybetmi\u015ftir. Kar\u015f\u0131la\u015f\u0131lan a\u011f\u0131r sonu\u00e7 nedeniyle Yarg\u0131tay\u0131n geli\u015ftirdi\u011fi \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fctlere g\u00f6re feshin son \u00e7are olmas\u0131 prensibinin bu t\u00fcr davalarda uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131n temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerin korunmas\u0131 i\u00e7in hayati \u00f6nemde oldu\u011fu a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. Zira son \u00e7are oldu\u011fu g\u00f6sterilmeden temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerini kullanan i\u015f\u00e7ilerin i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerinin feshedilmesi s\u00f6z konusu i\u015f\u00e7iler ve di\u011ferleri \u00fczerinde cayd\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 bir etkiye neden olacakt\u0131r. O h\u00e2lde bir i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin feshinin temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerin ihlaline neden olmamas\u0131 i\u00e7in i\u015f ili\u015fkisinin devam ettirilmesini imk\u00e2ns\u0131z k\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilen ve do\u011frudan en a\u011f\u0131r yapt\u0131r\u0131ma ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015f olan bu sebepler i\u015fverence ve daha sonra denetleme yapan yarg\u0131lama mercilerince hi\u00e7bir \u015f\u00fcpheye yer b\u0131rakmayacak \u015fekilde ortaya konulmal\u0131d\u0131r (benzer de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7in bkz. Kardelen Yo\u011fungan ve Sonay Tezcan, B. No: 2018\/24097, 2\/5\/2023, \u00a7 63; Ayhan Aky\u00fcz ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2018\/6851, 10\/5\/2023, \u00a7 45). Buna kar\u015f\u0131n ba\u015fvurucunun i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin sonland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131nda feshin son \u00e7are olmas\u0131 prensibinin de\u011ferlendirilmedi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Anayasa Mahkemesi daha hafif giderim yollar\u0131 izlenmeksizin do\u011frudan i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin feshedilmesinin ka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131lmaz oldu\u011funun g\u00f6sterilemedi\u011fini de\u011ferlendirmi\u015ftir (benzer de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7in bkz. Ayhan Aky\u00fcz ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 46).<\/p>\n
21. Tekrar ifade etmek gerekirse i\u015fverenlerin \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015f\u00e7ilerin verimli \u015fekilde i\u015f g\u00f6rmeleri ve \u00f6nceden saptanm\u0131\u015f nesnel kurallara sadakat g\u00f6stermeleri konusunda beklenti i\u00e7inde olmalar\u0131n\u0131n hakl\u0131 bir gereklili\u011fe dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmek gerekir. Zira i\u015fin veriminin d\u00fc\u015fmesine veya i\u015fveren ile olan g\u00fcven ili\u015fkisinin ciddi \u015fekilde zedelenmesine i\u015f\u00e7inin yol a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 durumlarda i\u015fverenin menfaatinin etkilenece\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla yasal d\u00fczenlemelerin ve i\u015fverenin belirledi\u011fi kurallar \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde devam eden i\u015f ili\u015fkisinin me\u015fru nedenler ortaya \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131nda bozulmas\u0131 ve sona erdirilmesi ola\u011fan bir durumdur (C.A. (3) [GK], B. No: 2018\/10286, 2\/7\/2020, \u00a7 123).<\/p>\n
22. Somut olayda ise ilgili ve yeterli bir gerek\u00e7e ortaya konulmadan 4857 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 18. maddesinin ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn dolayl\u0131 olarak s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na dayanak yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince Anayasa’n\u0131n 26. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan ilkelere uygun hareket edilmedi\u011fi kanaatine var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
23. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 26. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
B. Makul S\u00fcrede Yarg\u0131lanma Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
24. Ba\u015fvurucu, s\u00f6z konusu yarg\u0131laman\u0131n uzun s\u00fcrmesi nedeniyle ayr\u0131ca makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n da ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
25. Anayasa Mahkemesi Veysi Ado ([GK] B. No: 2022\/100837, 27\/4\/2023) karar\u0131nda; ilk bak\u0131\u015fta ula\u015f\u0131labilir olan ve ihlal iddialar\u0131yla ilgili ba\u015far\u0131 \u015fans\u0131 sunma ve yeterli giderim sa\u011flama kapasitesi oldu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fclen Tazminat Komisyonuna ba\u015fvuru yolu t\u00fcketilmeden yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun incelenmesinin bireysel ba\u015fvurunun ikincil niteli\u011fi ile ba\u011fda\u015fmayaca\u011f\u0131 sonucuna vararak ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemi\u015f olmas\u0131 nedeniyle kabul edilemezlik karar\u0131 vermi\u015ftir. Mevcut ba\u015fvuruda da s\u00f6z konusu karardan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren bir durum bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
26. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7eyle ba\u015fvurunun bu k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n di\u011fer kabul edilebilirlik nedenleri incelenmeksizin ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M <\/p>\n
27. Ba\u015fvurucu, ihlalin tespiti ve yarg\u0131laman\u0131n yenilenmesi talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
28. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamda karar\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi yarg\u0131 mercilerince yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden yarg\u0131lama i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flatmak ve Anayasa Mahkemesini ihlal sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131ran nedenleri gideren, ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere uygun yeni bir karar vermektir (Mehmet Do\u011fan, B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3), B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Adli yard\u0131m talebinin KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n
B. 1. Makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
2. \u0130fade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
C. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 26. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla \u00fczere \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 24. Hukuk Dairesine (E.2018\/4145, K.2020\/122) iletilmek \u00fczere Kocaeli 3. \u0130\u015f Mahkemesine (E.2017\/75, K.2018\/522) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. 18.800 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinin ba\u015fvurucuya \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
F. \u00d6demenin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
G. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 18\/7\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 18\/7\/2024 tarihli ve 2020\/12353 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u015e\u00dcKR\u00dc KOCABA\u015e BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/12353) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 18\/7\/2024 R.G. Tarih ve Say\u0131: 3\/12\/2024-32741 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM \u00a0 \u00a0 R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7 \u00a0 \u00a0 Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR Raport\u00f6r : \u015eeyda Nur \u00dcN Ba\u015fvurucu : \u015e\u00fckr\u00fc KOCABA\u015e Vekili : Av. Do\u011fan BEK\u0130RO\u011eLU \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, haz\u0131rlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 doktora \u00f6devinde meslek s\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131 if\u015fa etti\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi feshedilen ba\u015fvurucunun ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu 1988 do\u011fumlu olup 2014 y\u0131l\u0131ndan i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin feshedildi\u011fi tarihe kadar H.A.O. San. ve Tic. A.\u015e.’nin (\u0130\u015fveren\/\u015eirket) Kocaeli \u015fubesinde belirsiz s\u00fcreli i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesiyle \u00e7al\u0131\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu ayr\u0131ca Y\u0131ld\u0131z Teknik \u00dcniversitesi Makine M\u00fchendisli\u011fi B\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde doktora e\u011fitimine devam etmektedir. 3. Ba\u015fvurucu; \u015eirkette bak\u0131m m\u00fchendisi olarak g\u00f6rev yapmakta iken i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi 13\/1\/2017 tarihinde “\u00f6zel transport\u00f6rler isimli doktora dersinin \u00f6devinde meslek s\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131 ortaya att\u0131\u011f\u0131” gerek\u00e7esiyle ve hakl\u0131 nedenle feshedilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu “doktora \u00f6devinde herkese a\u00e7\u0131k makineler \u00fczerinde bir \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, \u00f6devin en ge\u00e7 Haziran 2016 tarihinde teslim edildi\u011fini, bilgisayar\u0131n\u0131n ele ge\u00e7irilerek bu \u00f6devin elde edildi\u011fini ve kendisine kar\u015f\u0131 6-7 ay sonra kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, \u00f6devde meslek s\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131 ortaya atacak bir bilgi bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131” belirterek feshin haks\u0131z ve ge\u00e7ersiz …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27,535],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-18871","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber","category-uncategorized-tr"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n