T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
J\u00dcL\u0130ET DEM\u0130RC\u0130O\u011eLU VE SONA Z MENTE\u015eE BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/27147)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 2\/10\/2024<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
G\u00fcls\u00fcm Gizem G\u00dcRSOY<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucular<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
1.J\u00fcliet DEM\u0130RC\u0130O\u011eLU<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
2. Sona Z MENTE\u015eE<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucular Vekilleri<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Arno KALAYCI<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Av. Sebu ASLANG\u0130L<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN KONUSU <\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n cemaat vakf\u0131 y\u00f6netimi se\u00e7imi yap\u0131lmas\u0131 taleplerinin reddedilmesi nedeniyle \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
II. BA\u015eVURU S\u00dcREC\u0130<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurular 18\/6\/2021 tarihinde yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Her iki ba\u015fvurucunun bireysel ba\u015fvurular\u0131, konu bak\u0131m\u0131ndan hukuki irtibat nedeniyle bu dosya \u00fczerinde birle\u015ftirilmi\u015ftir. Komisyon, ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fvuru belgelerinin bir \u00f6rne\u011fi, bilgi i\u00e7in Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6nderilmi\u015ftir. Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc bildirmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucular, Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 s\u00fcresinde beyanda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
III. OLAY VE OLGULAR <\/p>\n
4. Ba\u015fvurucular Gedikpa\u015fa Surp Hovhannes Ermeni Kilisesi Vakf\u0131 isimli cemaat vakf\u0131n\u0131n do\u011fal \u00fcyesidirler (Cemaat vak\u0131flar\u0131na ili\u015fkin tarihsel s\u00fcre\u00e7 ve bu vak\u0131flar\u0131n \u00fcyeli\u011fi ile ilgili detayl\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamalar i\u00e7in bkz. Corc Kasapo\u011flu ve Niko Mavrakis, B. No: 2019\/35842, 2\/5\/2023, \u00a7 9,10 ; Efthymia Meentzlou ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2019\/5202, 19\/12\/2023, \u00a7 6,7).<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucular 3\/6\/2020 tarihinde Vak\u0131f y\u00f6netimine ba\u015fvurarak; Vak\u0131f y\u00f6netim kurulu se\u00e7imlerinin on y\u0131l\u0131 a\u015fk\u0131n s\u00fcredir yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, se\u00e7imin yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n sa\u011flanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in Vak\u0131flar Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ba\u015fvuruda bulunulmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etmi\u015flerdir. Vak\u0131f y\u00f6netim kurulunun 20\/7\/2020 tarihinde verdi\u011fi cevabi yaz\u0131da; 27\/9\/2008 tarihli ve 27010 say\u0131l\u0131 Resm\u00ee Gazete\u2019de yay\u0131mlanan Cemaat Vak\u0131flar\u0131 Y\u00f6netim Kurulu Se\u00e7imlerinin Se\u00e7im Esas ve Usullerine \u0130li\u015fkin Y\u00f6netmeli\u011fin Y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckten Kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na Dair Y\u00f6netmelik’in (2008 tarihli Y\u00f6netmelik), 19\/1\/2013 tarihli ve 28533 say\u0131l\u0131 Resm\u00ee Gazete’de yay\u0131mlanan Vak\u0131flar Y\u00f6netmeli\u011fi’nde De\u011fi\u015fiklik Yap\u0131lmas\u0131na Dair Y\u00f6netmelik (2013 tarihli Y\u00f6netmelik) ile y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckten kald\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir. Vak\u0131f y\u00f6netimi y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckteki d\u00fczenlemeler gere\u011fi herhangi bir se\u00e7im yap\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve bu kapsamda bir taleple Vak\u0131flar Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ba\u015fvuruda bulunman\u0131n anlams\u0131z oldu\u011funu ifade etmi\u015ftir. Bunun \u00fczerine ba\u015fvurucular 4\/8\/2020 ve 7\/8\/2020 tarihlerinde Vak\u0131flar Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ba\u015fvuruda bulunarak, Vakf\u0131n se\u00e7imlerinin yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etmi\u015flerdir. Vak\u0131flar Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc konuyla ilgili y\u00f6netmelik \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n\u0131n devam etti\u011fini; bu s\u00fcre\u00e7te cemaat vak\u0131flar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcm, istifa vb. sebeplerle eksilen y\u00f6netim kurullar\u0131n\u0131n, kalan y\u00f6netim kurulunun karar\u0131yla kendi cemaati aras\u0131ndan \u00fcye say\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n tamamlanabilece\u011fini bildirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. Bunun \u00fczerine ba\u015fvurucular 27\/10\/2020 tarihinde Ankara 8. \u0130dare Mahkemesinde, Vak\u0131flar Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn z\u0131mni ret i\u015fleminin iptali talepli dava a\u00e7m\u0131\u015flard\u0131r. Mahkeme 29\/12\/2020 tarihinde davalar\u0131n g\u00f6rev y\u00f6n\u00fcnden reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. Gerek\u00e7eli kararlarda; cemaat vak\u0131flar\u0131 da d\u00e2hil olmak \u00fczere mazbut, m\u00fclhak ve esnaf vak\u0131flar\u0131 ile yeni vak\u0131flar\u0131n \u00f6zel hukuk t\u00fczel ki\u015fisi oldu\u011fu, Vak\u0131flar Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn denetim yetkisinin, cemaat vakf\u0131 y\u00f6neticilerinin se\u00e7iminin, kanun ve y\u00f6netmeli\u011fe uygun olarak yap\u0131l\u0131p yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 oldu\u011fu belirtilmi\u015ftir. Kararlarda; \u00f6zel hukuk t\u00fczel ki\u015fisi olan cemaat vak\u0131flar\u0131n\u0131n y\u00f6netici se\u00e7imlerinin yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f se\u00e7imlerin iptaline veya se\u00e7imin ge\u00e7erli oldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin karar verme g\u00f6rev ve yetkisinin adli yarg\u0131 yerine ait oldu\u011funun alt\u0131 \u00e7izilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. An\u0131lan kararlar Ankara B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesi 10. \u0130dari Dava Dairesinin 7\/4\/2021 ve 14\/4\/2021 tarihli kararlar\u0131yla onanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
8. Nihai kararlar\u0131n tebli\u011fi \u00fczerine ba\u015fvurucular, s\u00fcresinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015flard\u0131r.<\/p>\n
IV. \u0130LG\u0130L\u0130 HUKUK<\/p>\n
A. Ulusal Hukuk <\/p>\n
9. 2008 tarihli Y\u00f6netmelik’in ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“Madde 1: Bu Y\u00f6netmelik; yeni vak\u0131flar\u0131n kurulu\u015fu, vak\u0131flar\u0131n y\u00f6netimi, faaliyetleri, denetimlerine ili\u015fkin us\u00fbl ve esaslar ile Vak\u0131flar Meclisi, Rehberlik ve Tefti\u015f Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131, Vak\u0131f Uzmanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve Uzman Yard\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile ilgili g\u00f6rev, yetki ve sorumluluklar\u0131n d\u00fczenlenmesi amac\u0131yla haz\u0131rlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Madde 2: Bu Y\u00f6netmelik 20\/2\/2008 tarihli ve 5737 say\u0131l\u0131 Vak\u0131flar Kanununa dayan\u0131larak haz\u0131rlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Madde 3: Bu Y\u00f6netmelikte ge\u00e7en;<\/p>\n
c) 1936 Beyannamesi: Cemaat vak\u0131flar\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fclga 2762 say\u0131l\u0131 Vak\u0131flar Kanunu gere\u011fince verdikleri beyannameyi,<\/p>\n
d) Cemaat vakf\u0131: Vakfiyeleri olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na bak\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n m\u00fclga 2762 say\u0131l\u0131 Vak\u0131flar Kanunu gere\u011fince t\u00fczel ki\u015filik kazanm\u0131\u015f, mensuplar\u0131 T\u00fcrkiye Cumhuriyeti vatanda\u015f\u0131 olan T\u00fcrkiye\u2019deki gayrim\u00fcslim cemaatlere ait vak\u0131flar\u0131,<\/p>\n
z) Vak\u0131f y\u00f6neticisi: M\u00fclhak, cemaat ve esnaf vak\u0131flar\u0131 ile yeni vak\u0131flarda; vakfiye, 1936 Beyannamesi, vak\u0131f senedi, 4721 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Meden\u00ee Kanunu ve Kanuna g\u00f6re vakf\u0131 y\u00f6netmeye ve temsile yetkili ki\u015fi veya yetkili organlarda g\u00f6rev alan ki\u015fileri,<\/p>\n
aa) Vak\u0131f y\u00f6netimi: M\u00fclhak, cemaat ve esnaf vak\u0131flar\u0131 ile yeni vak\u0131flarda; vakfiye, 1936 Beyannamesi, vak\u0131f senedi, 4721 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Meden\u00ee Kanunu ve Kanuna g\u00f6re vakf\u0131 y\u00f6netmeye ve temsile yetkili organ\u0131, ifade eder.<\/p>\n
…<\/p>\n
Madde 30: Cemaat vak\u0131flar\u0131n\u0131n y\u00f6netim kurulu se\u00e7imlerinde;<\/p>\n
a) Vakf\u0131n y\u00f6netim kurulu se\u00e7imine, vak\u0131f veya hayrat\u0131ndan yararlanan cemaat mensuplar\u0131 kat\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n
b) Her vak\u0131f i\u00e7in ayr\u0131 bir y\u00f6netim kurulu se\u00e7ilir ve y\u00f6netim kurulu se\u00e7imleri d\u00f6rt y\u0131lda bir yap\u0131l\u0131r. “<\/p>\n
10. 2013 tarihli Y\u00f6netmelik’in ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“Madde 1: 27\/9\/2008 tarihli ve 27010 say\u0131l\u0131 Resm\u00ee Gazete\u2019de yay\u0131mlanan Vak\u0131flar Y\u00f6netmeli\u011finin \u00dc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc B\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc ile birlikte 29, 30, 31, 32, 33 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddeleri y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckten kald\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.”<\/p>\n
B. Uluslararas\u0131 Hukuk<\/p>\n
11. \u0130lgili A\u0130HM i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131 i\u00e7in bkz.Efthymia Meentzlou ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 21-23.<\/p>\n
V. \u0130NCELEME VE GEREK\u00c7E<\/p>\n
12. Anayasa Mahkemesinin 2\/10\/2024 tarihinde yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu toplant\u0131da ba\u015fvuru incelenip gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n
A. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n \u0130ddialar\u0131 ve Bakanl\u0131k G\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc<\/p>\n
13. Ba\u015fvurucular; ba\u015fvuru konusu Vakf\u0131n Y\u00f6netim Kurulu se\u00e7iminin on y\u0131l\u0131 a\u015fk\u0131n s\u00fcredir yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, idari ve yarg\u0131 makamlar\u0131n\u0131n bu duruma bir \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm getiremedi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Cemaat vak\u0131f \u00fcyelerinin haklar\u0131n\u0131n Lozan Antla\u015fmas\u0131 ile korundu\u011funu, bu durumun Mahkemece g\u00f6zard\u0131 edildi\u011fini, Vakf\u0131 hi\u00e7bir y\u00f6nden denetleyemediklerini belirterek adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131, \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131, e\u015fitlik ilkesi, din ve vicdan \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ile \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerinin ihlal edildi\u011finden yak\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
14. Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde; 18 Haziran 2022 tarih ve 31870 say\u0131l\u0131 Resm\u00ee Gazete’de Cemaat Vak\u0131flar\u0131 Se\u00e7im Y\u00f6netmeli\u011finin yay\u0131mlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girdi\u011fi, Y\u00f6netmeli\u011fin y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmesinden sonra Gedikpa\u015fa Surp Hovhannes Ermeni Kilisesi Vakf\u0131’n\u0131n y\u00f6netim kurulu se\u00e7imleri tamamlanarak yeni y\u00f6netim kurulunun olu\u015fturuldu\u011fu belirtilmi\u015ftir. Bu kapsamda Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde \u00f6ncelikle ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n ma\u011fdur stat\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn devam edip etmedi\u011finin incelenmesi, bu hususun a\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde ise Anayasa ve mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmleri do\u011frultusunda somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi ifade edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
15. Ba\u015fvurucular, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 bireysel ba\u015fvuru formunda ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fckleri hususlar\u0131 tekrarlam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucular ayr\u0131ca; 2022 y\u0131l\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren Y\u00f6netmelik h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z ve tarafs\u0131z bir se\u00e7im sa\u011flamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
B. De\u011ferlendirme<\/p>\n
16. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n \u201cDernek kurma h\u00fcrriyeti\u201d kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 33. maddesinin ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“Herkes, \u00f6nceden izin almaks\u0131z\u0131n dernek kurma ve bunlara \u00fcye olma ya da \u00fcyelikten \u00e7\u0131kma h\u00fcrriyetine sahiptir.<\/p>\n
Hi\u00e7 kimse bir derne\u011fe \u00fcye olmaya ve dernekte \u00fcye kalmaya zorlanamaz.<\/p>\n
Dernek kurma h\u00fcrriyetinin kullan\u0131lmas\u0131nda uygulanacak \u015fekil, \u015fart ve usuller kanunda g\u00f6sterilir.<\/p>\n
…<\/p>\n
Bu madde h\u00fck\u00fcmleri vak\u0131flarla ilgili olarak da uygulan\u0131r.”<\/p>\n
17. Anayasa’n\u0131n 33. maddesinde herkesin bir derne\u011fe \u00fcye olma \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne sahip oldu\u011fu belirtilmi\u015ftir. An\u0131lan madde h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin vak\u0131flarla ilgili olarak da uygulanaca\u011f\u0131 belirlenmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucular, cemaat vakf\u0131 y\u00f6netimi se\u00e7imlerinin yap\u0131lmamas\u0131 nedeniyle bu \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn idari i\u015fleyi\u015fine d\u00e2hil olma, \u00f6rg\u00fct organlar\u0131n\u0131 denetleme, \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn organlar\u0131nda g\u00f6rev alma gibi haklar\u0131 elde edememi\u015ftir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla eldeki ba\u015fvurunun \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc y\u00f6n\u00fcnden incelenmesi gerekmektedir (Efthymia Meentzlou ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 27).<\/p>\n
1. Kabul Edilebilirlik Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden<\/p>\n
18. \u00d6ncelikle Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde 2022 y\u0131l\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren Y\u00f6netmelik h\u00fck\u00fcmleri \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde Vak\u0131f se\u00e7imlerinin yap\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n ma\u011fdur stat\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn devam edip etmedi\u011finin de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
19. 30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun\u2019un “Bireysel ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131na sahip olanlar” kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 46. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca bireysel ba\u015fvuru ancak ihlale yol a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen i\u015flem, eylem ya da ihmal nedeniyle g\u00fcncel ve ki\u015fisel bir hakk\u0131 do\u011frudan etkilenenler taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131labilir.<\/p>\n
20. Buna g\u00f6re bir ki\u015finin Anayasa Mahkemesine bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunabilmesi i\u00e7in \u00fc\u00e7 temel \u00f6n \u015fart\u0131n birlikte bulunmas\u0131 gerekmektedir. Bunlar, ba\u015fvuruya konu edilen kamu g\u00fcc\u00fc eylem veya i\u015fleminden ya da ihmalinden ba\u015fvurucunun g\u00fcncel bir hakk\u0131 nedeniyle ki\u015fisel olarak ve do\u011frudan etkilenmesidir. Bu \u00e7er\u00e7evede ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan sonu\u00e7 nedeniyle ba\u015fvurucunun ma\u011fdur oldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrmesi gerekir (Onur Do\u011fanay, B. No: 2013\/1977, 9\/1\/2014, \u00a7 42). Ba\u015fvurucular Vakf\u0131n do\u011fal \u00fcyesidirler ve her ne kadar 2022 y\u0131l\u0131nda Vak\u0131f se\u00e7imleri yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve ba\u015fvurucular 2020 y\u0131l\u0131nda idareye ba\u015fvurmu\u015f iseler de, mensubu olduklar\u0131 vak\u0131fta on y\u0131ldan fazla uzunca bir s\u00fcre boyunca se\u00e7imler yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucular bu s\u00fcre\u00e7te Vakf\u0131n \u00f6rg\u00fctlenmesinde yer alamam\u0131\u015flard\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n ma\u011fdur stat\u00fcs\u00fc y\u00f6n\u00fcnden herhangi bir sorun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
21. Yan\u0131 s\u0131ra Anayasa Mahkemesi, Corc Kasapo\u011flu ve Niko Mavrakis karar\u0131nda idare mahkemelerince adli yarg\u0131 mercilerinin yetkili oldu\u011fu belirtilerek g\u00f6rev bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ret karar\u0131 verilmesi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilip t\u00fcketilmedi\u011fi hususunun netle\u015ftirilmesi gerekti\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir. An\u0131lan kararda Anayasa Mahkemesi, ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n sekiz y\u0131l boyunca \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnce koruma alt\u0131na al\u0131nan haklar\u0131n\u0131 kullanamamalar\u0131n\u0131n devletin pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerini yerine getirip getirmedi\u011finin incelenmesi ile ilgili oldu\u011funu ve dolay\u0131s\u0131yla Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 33. maddesi ba\u011flam\u0131ndaki \u015fik\u00e2yetlerin \u00f6z\u00fcne s\u0131k\u0131 s\u0131k\u0131ya ba\u011fl\u0131 sorunlar ortaya \u00e7\u0131kard\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu nedenle ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmesinin gerekip gerekmedi\u011fi meselesinin esasla birlikte incelenmesinin uygun olaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmi\u015ftir (Corc Kasapo\u011flu ve Niko Mavrakis,\u00a740).<\/p>\n
22. Eldeki ba\u015fvuruda da ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n mensubu oldu\u011fu Vak\u0131fta on y\u0131ldan fazla s\u00fcredir se\u00e7im yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla yukar\u0131da de\u011finilen karardaki hususlardan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektirir bir y\u00f6n bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamda a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
2. Esas Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden<\/p>\n
23. \u00d6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, bireylerin kendi menfaatlerini korumak i\u00e7in kendilerini temsil eden kolektif bir olu\u015fum i\u00e7inde bir araya gelme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ifade eder. \u00d6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc bireylere topluluk h\u00e2linde siyasal, k\u00fclt\u00fcrel, sosyal ve ekonomik ama\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirme imk\u00e2n\u0131 sa\u011flar. \u00d6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn temeli, hi\u00e7 ku\u015fkusuz ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcd\u00fcr. \u0130fade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnceyi korkmadan, engellenmeden a\u00e7\u0131klama ve yayma \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn yan\u0131 s\u0131ra bu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnceler \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme, ki\u015fi topluluklar\u0131 olu\u015fturma hakk\u0131n\u0131 da kapsamaktad\u0131r (dernek hakk\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden bkz. Hint Aseel Hayvanlar\u0131 Koruma ve Geli\u015ftirme Derne\u011fi ve Hikmet Ne\u011fu\u00e7, B. No: 2014\/4711, 22\/2\/2017, \u00a7 41). Demokrasilerde vatanda\u015flar\u0131n bir araya gelerek ortak ama\u00e7lar\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirebilece\u011fi \u00f6rg\u00fctlerin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 sa\u011fl\u0131kl\u0131 bir toplumun \u00f6nemli bir bile\u015fenidir. Demokrasilerde b\u00f6yle bir \u00f6rg\u00fct, devlet taraf\u0131ndan sayg\u0131 g\u00f6sterilmesi ve korunmas\u0131 gereken temel haklara sahiptir (Ahmet Parmaks\u0131z [GK], B. No: 2017\/29263, 22\/5\/2019, \u00a7 72; sendika hakk\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden bkz. Tayfun Cengiz, B. No: 2013\/8463, 18\/9\/2014, \u00a7 31).<\/p>\n
24. \u00d6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, bu hakka y\u00f6nelik kamu g\u00fcc\u00fc taraf\u0131ndan ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen m\u00fcdahalelerin yan\u0131 s\u0131ra kimi durumlarda \u00f6zel hukuk ki\u015filerince yap\u0131lan m\u00fcdahalelere kar\u015f\u0131 da anayasal koruma sa\u011flamaktad\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc devlete, m\u00fcdahalede bulunmama bi\u00e7imindeki negatif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn yan\u0131 s\u0131ra \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015filerden gelebilecek m\u00fcdahalelere kar\u015f\u0131 ilgiliye koruma sa\u011flama \u015feklindeki birtak\u0131m pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckler de y\u00fcklemektedir (benzer de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7in bkz. An\u0131l P\u0131nar ve \u00d6mer Bilge, B. No: 2014\/15627, 5\/10\/2017, \u00a7 36; Bar\u0131\u015f Ad\u0131g\u00fczel, B. No: 2016\/16056, 21\/4\/2021, \u00a7 29).<\/p>\n
25. Pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fck alt\u0131nda olan devletin bireyleri koruyucu \u00f6nlemleri alma ve gerekli mekanizmalar\u0131 yerle\u015ftirme sorumlulu\u011fu vard\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi h\u00e2lde birtak\u0131m i\u015flemlerin ve tasarruflar\u0131n yap\u0131lmamas\u0131 ya da al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi h\u00e2lde belli tedbirlerin al\u0131nmamas\u0131 devletin sorumlulu\u011funu yerine getirmedi\u011fi anlam\u0131na gelecektir. Ayr\u0131ca al\u0131nacak tedbirlerin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015filerin \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne m\u00fcdahalede bulunmalar\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan cayd\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 nitelikte olmas\u0131 gerekir. S\u00f6z konusu anlay\u0131\u015f; devlete \u00e7\u0131karaca\u011f\u0131 kanunlarla, yapaca\u011f\u0131 d\u00fczenlemelerle ve alaca\u011f\u0131 her t\u00fcrl\u00fc somut tedbirlerle ki\u015filerin temel haklar\u0131n\u0131 \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015filere kar\u015f\u0131 koruma sorumlulu\u011fu y\u00fcklemektedir. Bu bak\u0131mdan \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015filer taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne m\u00fcdahale edilmesi durumunda m\u00fcdahaleye kar\u015f\u0131 itirazlar\u0131n \u00f6ne s\u00fcr\u00fclebilece\u011fi ve m\u00fcdahalenin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n giderilmesi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan ger\u00e7ek ve etkili koruma temin edecek idari ve hukuksal mekanizmalar\u0131n olu\u015fturulmas\u0131 devletin pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerindendir (benzer de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7in bkz. An\u0131l P\u0131nar ve \u00d6mer Bilge, \u00a7 30).<\/p>\n
26. Mevcut ba\u015fvuru ko\u015fullar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden \u00f6nemli olan husus, \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn kullan\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n sa\u011flanmas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik yeterli mevzuat alt yap\u0131s\u0131 ile idari ve yarg\u0131sal mekanizmalar\u0131n olu\u015fturulup olu\u015fturulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 meselesidir.<\/p>\n
27. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n din\u00ee az\u0131nl\u0131ktan ki\u015filer oldu\u011funun hat\u0131rlat\u0131lmas\u0131nda da fayda vard\u0131r. \u00d6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc her bir vatanda\u015f\u0131n etkin bir \u015fekilde kullanmas\u0131n\u0131n sa\u011flanmas\u0131n\u0131n demokratik bir toplum i\u00e7in \u00f6nemi ku\u015fkusuz olmakla birlikte az\u0131nl\u0131\u011fa mensup bireyler a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan bu hususun daha hassas oldu\u011funun belirtilmesi gerekir. Zira bu kimseler \u00e7o\u011funluk i\u00e7inde sahip olduklar\u0131 kimlikleri korumak ve kimliklerine \u00f6zg\u00fc tarihsel, din\u00ee, sosyal, ekonomik, k\u00fclt\u00fcrel durumlar\u0131, haklar\u0131 daha g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc bir bi\u00e7imde ifade etmek i\u00e7in bir araya gelir ve bu kimselerin az\u0131nl\u0131k konumunda olmalar\u0131ndan \u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fc daha fazla korunmalar\u0131 gerekir. Bu nedenle devletin toplumsal b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc temin etmek ad\u0131na az\u0131nl\u0131k haklar\u0131n\u0131 korumas\u0131 ve bu haklar\u0131n en etkin \u015fekilde kullan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamas\u0131 yarg\u0131sal s\u00fcre\u00e7lerin s\u00fcratle sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 ile m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr (Corc Kasapo\u011flu ve Niko Mavrakis, \u00a7 46; Efthymia Meentzlou ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 32) .<\/p>\n
28. Ba\u015fvuru konusu olay 5737 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un i\u015faret etti\u011fi \u015fekilde cemaat vak\u0131flar\u0131n\u0131n se\u00e7im usullerinin y\u00f6netmelikle belirlenmesi h\u00fckm\u00fcne istinaden \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan y\u00f6netmeli\u011fin iptal edilmesi etraf\u0131nda \u015fekillenmi\u015ftir. Bunun sonucunda an\u0131lan se\u00e7im usullerini d\u00fczenleyen bir y\u00f6netmelik bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle uzun y\u0131llar boyunca se\u00e7im yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u0130lgili Y\u00f6netmelik iptal edildikten sonra, yeni bir Y\u00f6netmelik \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmamas\u0131n\u0131n, bu s\u00fcre zarf\u0131nda idarenin hareketsiz kalmas\u0131n\u0131n temel hakk\u0131n kullan\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 engelleyici nitelikte bir mevzuat bo\u015flu\u011fu yaratt\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. Buna ra\u011fmen kanun koyucunun i\u015faret etti\u011fi \u015fekilde idare s\u00f6z konusu alan\u0131 d\u00fczenlememi\u015f ve 19\/1\/2013 tarihinden itibaren cemaat vak\u0131flar\u0131n\u0131n se\u00e7im usullerinde uygulanacak kurallar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden bir mevzuat bo\u015flu\u011fu olu\u015fmu\u015ftur (Efthymia Meentzlou ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 34).<\/p>\n
29. \u00d6te yandan ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n vak\u0131f y\u00f6netim kurulu se\u00e7imi yap\u0131lmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla idareye yapt\u0131klar\u0131 ba\u015fvurunun reddedilmesinden sonra a\u00e7t\u0131klar\u0131 davada g\u00f6rev y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ret karar\u0131 verilmi\u015ftir. Bir ba\u015fka deyi\u015fle yarg\u0131laman\u0131n sonunda davan\u0131n esas\u0131 hakk\u0131nda bir karar verilmemi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucular yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcresi boyunca cemaat vakf\u0131 se\u00e7imlerinin yapt\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flayamam\u0131\u015f; \u00f6zetle Vakf\u0131n do\u011fal \u00fcyeleri olmalar\u0131na ra\u011fmen Vakf\u0131n y\u00f6netimi ile ilgili oy kullanamam\u0131\u015f, se\u00e7imlerde s\u00f6z sahibi olamam\u0131\u015f, Vak\u0131f y\u00f6netimini denetleyememi\u015f ve sonu\u00e7 olarak \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerinden yararlanamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (Efthymia Meentzlou ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 35).<\/p>\n
30. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla yukar\u0131da anlat\u0131lanlar \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde olaylar bir b\u00fct\u00fcn olarak de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde devletin uzun bir s\u00fcre boyunca \u00fczerine d\u00fc\u015fen y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc yerine getirerek y\u00f6netmelik d\u00fczenlemesi yapmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu durum ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n cemaat vakf\u0131 y\u00f6netim kurulu se\u00e7imleri yap\u0131lmamas\u0131 ile ilgili \u015fik\u00e2yetinin uzunca bir s\u00fcre \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcms\u00fcz b\u0131rak\u0131larak \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn getirdi\u011fi haklara eri\u015fimlerini imk\u00e2ns\u0131z k\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Netice olarak devletin ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n s\u00f6z\u00fc edilen Vak\u0131flarda kendileri ve Vakf\u0131n \u00fcyeleri ad\u0131na \u00f6rg\u00fctl\u00fc bir bi\u00e7imde hareket etme hakk\u0131ndan etkin bir \u015fekilde yararlanmalar\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamak konusundaki pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerini yerine getirmedi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (Efthymia Meentzlou ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 36).<\/p>\n
31. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa’n\u0131n 33. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
VI. G\u0130DER\u0130M<\/p>\n
32. Ba\u015fvurucular ihlalin tespit edilmesi talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
33. Niteli\u011fi itibar\u0131yla ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Yap\u0131lan incelemede 18\/6\/2022 tarihli ve 31870 say\u0131l\u0131 Resm\u00ee Gazete\u2019de Cemaat Vak\u0131flar\u0131 Se\u00e7im Y\u00f6netmeli\u011fi’nin yay\u0131mland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve bu kapsamda Vak\u0131f se\u00e7imlerinin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. O h\u00e2lde somut ba\u015fvuruda ihlale neden olan y\u00f6netmelik bo\u015flu\u011funun 2022 tarihli Y\u00f6netmelik h\u00fck\u00fcmleri \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde giderilebildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve ihlalin tespiti ile yetinilmesi gerekti\u011fi de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
VII. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A. \u00d6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 33. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
C. 975,20 TL har\u00e7 ve 18.800 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinden olu\u015fan toplam 19.775,20 TL yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvuruculara M\u00dc\u015eTEREKEN \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. \u00d6demenin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
E. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 2\/10\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 2\/10\/2024 tarihli ve 2021\/27147 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 J\u00dcL\u0130ET DEM\u0130RC\u0130O\u011eLU VE SONA Z MENTE\u015eE BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/27147) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 2\/10\/2024 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM \u00a0 \u00a0 R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7 \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU \u00a0 \u00a0 Kenan YA\u015eAR Raport\u00f6r : G\u00fcls\u00fcm Gizem G\u00dcRSOY Ba\u015fvurucular : 1.J\u00fcliet DEM\u0130RC\u0130O\u011eLU \u00a0 \u00a0 2. Sona Z MENTE\u015eE Ba\u015fvurucular Vekilleri : Av. Arno KALAYCI \u00a0 \u00a0 Av. Sebu ASLANG\u0130L \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN KONUSU 1. Ba\u015fvuru, ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n cemaat vakf\u0131 y\u00f6netimi se\u00e7imi yap\u0131lmas\u0131 taleplerinin reddedilmesi nedeniyle \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. II. BA\u015eVURU S\u00dcREC\u0130 2. Ba\u015fvurular 18\/6\/2021 tarihinde yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Her iki ba\u015fvurucunun bireysel ba\u015fvurular\u0131, konu bak\u0131m\u0131ndan hukuki irtibat nedeniyle bu dosya \u00fczerinde birle\u015ftirilmi\u015ftir. Komisyon, ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. 3. Ba\u015fvuru belgelerinin bir \u00f6rne\u011fi, bilgi i\u00e7in Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6nderilmi\u015ftir. Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc bildirmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucular, Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 s\u00fcresinde beyanda bulunmu\u015ftur. III. OLAY VE OLGULAR 4. Ba\u015fvurucular Gedikpa\u015fa Surp Hovhannes Ermeni Kilisesi Vakf\u0131 isimli cemaat vakf\u0131n\u0131n do\u011fal \u00fcyesidirler (Cemaat vak\u0131flar\u0131na ili\u015fkin tarihsel s\u00fcre\u00e7 ve bu vak\u0131flar\u0131n \u00fcyeli\u011fi ile ilgili detayl\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamalar i\u00e7in bkz. Corc Kasapo\u011flu ve Niko Mavrakis, B. No: 2019\/35842, 2\/5\/2023, \u00a7 9,10 ; Efthymia Meentzlou ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27,535],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-17118","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber","category-uncategorized-tr"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n