T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
E.A. BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2019\/31619)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 2\/10\/2024<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
G\u0130ZL\u0130L\u0130K TALEB\u0130 KABUL<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Muhammed Cemil KANDEM\u0130R<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
E.A.<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Tuba Y\u00dcCEER \u00d6RK\u00dcP<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, asker\u00ee okulda \u00f6\u011frenime devam edilirken okuldan ili\u015fik kesilerek ba\u015fka okula nakledilme \u00fczerine a\u00e7\u0131lan tazminat davas\u0131n\u0131n incelenmeksizin reddedilmesi nedeniyle adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucunun 13\/6\/2014 tarihinde Maltepe Asker\u00ee Lisesinden mezun oldu\u011fu ve 2014-2015 e\u011fitim \u00f6\u011fretim d\u00f6neminde Kara Harp Okulunda e\u011fitimine ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. 15 Temmuz 2016 tarihinde ya\u015fanan darbe te\u015febb\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn ard\u0131ndan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan 25\/7\/2016 tarihli ve 669 say\u0131l\u0131 Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc Hal Kapsam\u0131nda Baz\u0131 Tedbirler Al\u0131nmas\u0131 ve Milli Savunma \u00dcniversitesi Kurulmas\u0131 ile Baz\u0131 Kanunlarda De\u011fi\u015fiklik Yap\u0131lmas\u0131na Dair Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararname’nin (669 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK) 104. maddesinde harp akademilerinin, asker\u00ee liselerin ve astsubay haz\u0131rlama okullar\u0131n\u0131n kapat\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin d\u00fczenleme yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Mezk\u00fbr KHK’n\u0131n 105. maddesi uyar\u0131nca asker\u00ee okullarda \u00f6\u011frenimine devam eden \u00f6\u011frenciler durumlar\u0131na uygun okula nakledilecektir. 669 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK’n\u0131n yay\u0131mland\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihte Kara Harp Okulunda ikinci s\u0131n\u0131ftan \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc s\u0131n\u0131fa ge\u00e7mi\u015f olan ba\u015fvurucunun bu kapsamda sivil bir \u00fcniversiteye nakledildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
4. Ba\u015fvurucu; asker\u00ee okullar\u0131n kapat\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u015fleminin iptali, bu talebinin kabul g\u00f6rmemesi h\u00e2linde maddi ve manevi zarar\u0131n\u0131n tazmini talebiyle dava a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
5. Ankara 2. \u0130dare Mahkemesi (Mahkeme) 27\/10\/2017 tarihli karar\u0131yla terditli taleplerde bulunuldu\u011fu, talebin net olarak ortaya konulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve s\u00f6z konusu iptal i\u015flemi ile tazminat \u00f6denmesi i\u015flemleri aras\u0131nda maddi veya hukuki y\u00f6nden ba\u011fl\u0131l\u0131k ya da sebep-sonu\u00e7 ili\u015fkisi bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle dava dilek\u00e7esinin reddine karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. Bunun \u00fczerine ba\u015fvurucu dava dilek\u00e7esini yeniden d\u00fczenleyerek iki ayr\u0131 dava a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bireysel ba\u015fvuruya konu davada ba\u015fvurucu; asker\u00ee okullar\u0131n kapat\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle maddi ve manevi tazminat talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. Mahkeme 8\/11\/2018 tarihli karar\u0131nda; 669 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK ile tan\u0131nan ba\u015fka okula ge\u00e7i\u015f hakk\u0131ndan yararland\u0131r\u0131lan ba\u015fvurucunun herhangi bir maddi zarar\u0131n\u0131n olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, dava konusu i\u015flem nedeniyle manevi tazminat \u00f6denmesinin ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n da mevcut olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilerek maddi ve manevi tazminat istemi reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesi, istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun gerek\u00e7eli olarak reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. Kararda; ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda tesis edilen i\u015flemin yasama tasarrufu oldu\u011fu, bu nedenle idari davaya konu edilebilecek bir i\u015flemin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan s\u00f6z edilemeyece\u011fi, ba\u015fvurucunun tazminat talebinin 6\/1\/1982 tarihli ve 2577 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130dari Yarg\u0131lama Usul\u00fc Kanunu kapsam\u0131nda bir tazminat talebi olarak nitelendirilemeyece\u011fi, davan\u0131n incelenmeksizin reddi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde karar verilmesi gerekti\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
9. Nihai karar\u0131 ba\u015fvurucu 9\/8\/2019 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frenmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu 6\/9\/2019 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur. <\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
10. Ba\u015fvurucu, e\u011fitim ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 asker\u00ee okulla ili\u015fi\u011fi kesilmesi ve a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 davan\u0131n esas\u0131n\u0131n incelenmemesi nedeniyle su\u00e7lar\u0131n \u015fahsili\u011fi ilkesi ile e\u011fitim ve mahkemeye eri\u015fim haklar\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
11. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde; yarg\u0131 mercilerinin kararlar\u0131nda bariz takdir hatas\u0131 veya a\u00e7\u0131k bir keyf\u00eelik olu\u015fturan bir durum bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ba\u015fvurucunun mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edilip edilmedi\u011fi konusunda yap\u0131lacak incelemede Anayasa ve ilgili mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmleri ile somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcn ekinde yer alan Milli Savunma Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 yaz\u0131s\u0131nda; ba\u011fl\u0131 yetki kapsam\u0131nda tesis edilen i\u015flemin hukuka uygun oldu\u011fu, ba\u015fvurucunun iptalini talep etti\u011fi s\u00f6z konusu yasama i\u015flemine kar\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131lan bireysel ba\u015fvurunun reddedilmesi gerekti\u011fi ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
12. Anayasa Mahkemesinin \u0130hsan Korkmaz, (B. No: 2019\/15190, 2\/4\/2024) karar\u0131na konu olayda, ba\u015fvurucu 2014-2015 e\u011fitim \u00f6\u011fretim d\u00f6neminde Deniz Harp Okulunda e\u011fitimine ba\u015flam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu, d\u00f6rt y\u0131ll\u0131k okulun \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc s\u0131n\u0131f\u0131na ge\u00e7mi\u015fken 669 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK uyar\u0131nca asker\u00ee okullar\u0131n kapat\u0131lmas\u0131 \u00fczerine okulla ili\u015fi\u011fi kesilmi\u015f; durumuna uygun ba\u015fka bir okula nakledilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, asker\u00ee \u00f6\u011frencilikten \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lma i\u015fleminin ve bunun dayana\u011f\u0131 olan 669 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK maddelerinin iptali talebiyle a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 davan\u0131n incelenmeksizin reddedilmesi \u00fczerine kamu hizmetine girme, m\u00fclkiyet, adil yarg\u0131lanma ve etkili ba\u015fvuru haklar\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131yla bireysel ba\u015fvuru yapm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (\u0130hsan Korkmaz, \u00a7 31).<\/p>\n
13. Anayasa Mahkemesi \u0130hsan Korkmaz karar\u0131nda, ba\u015fvurucunun t\u00fcm ihlal iddialar\u0131n\u0131n Anayasa’n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden incelenmesi gerekti\u011fi de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015f (\u0130hsan Korkmaz, \u00a7 36) ve ba\u015fvurunun konu bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yetkisizlik nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011fu sonucuna ula\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde; darbe giri\u015fimi sonras\u0131nda asker\u00ee e\u011fitimin d\u00fczenlenmesinde, asker\u00ee okullar\u0131n kapat\u0131lmas\u0131nda ve ara s\u0131n\u0131ftaki \u00f6\u011frencilerin ba\u015fka okullara nakledilmesinde kamu hukukunun a\u011f\u0131r bast\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu ba\u011flamda asker\u00ee \u00f6\u011frencilik stat\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn korunmas\u0131n\u0131n Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi’nin 6. maddesinin medeni y\u00f6n\u00fcn\u00fcn kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131, an\u0131lan stat\u00fcn\u00fcn korunmas\u0131n\u0131n medeni bir hak olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir( \u0130hsan Korkmaz, \u00a7\u00a7 47-49).<\/p>\n
14. Ba\u015fvurucunun e\u011fitim ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 asker\u00ee okulun 669 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK ile kapat\u0131lmas\u0131 sonras\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucu nakledildi\u011fi \u00fcniversitede e\u011fitimine devam etmi\u015ftir. Bunun \u00fczerine ba\u015fvurucunun a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 iptal ve tam yarg\u0131 davas\u0131nda dava dilek\u00e7esinin reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Her ne kadar bireysel ba\u015fvuruya konu dava, ba\u015fvurucunun nihai talebi sadece tazminat olsa da bu davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131na sebep olan olgu 15 Temmuz darbe giri\u015fimi sonras\u0131nda \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan 669 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK ile asker\u00ee okullar\u0131n kapat\u0131lmas\u0131 \u00fczerine -ba\u015fvurucunun da aralar\u0131nda bulundu\u011fu- ara s\u0131n\u0131flarda \u00f6\u011frenimine devam eden t\u00fcm \u00f6\u011frencilerin durumlar\u0131na uygun okullara nakledilmesidir. Ba\u015fvurucunun t\u00fcm ihlal iddialar\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hsan Korkmaz karar\u0131nda oldu\u011fu gibi adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden incelenmesi gerekti\u011fi de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir. Asker\u00ee \u00f6\u011frencilik stat\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn korunmamas\u0131 nedeniyle a\u00e7\u0131lan tazminat davas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131lan somut ba\u015fvuruda \u0130hsan Korkmaz karar\u0131ndan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren bir durum bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
15. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurunun di\u011fer kabul edilebilirlik \u015fartlar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden incelenmeksizin konu bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yetkisizlik nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Ba\u015fvurucunun kamuya a\u00e7\u0131k belgelerde kimli\u011finin gizli tutulmas\u0131 talebinin KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n
B. Ba\u015fvurunun konu bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yetkisizlik nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
C. Yarg\u0131lama giderlerinin ba\u015fvurucu \u00fczerinde BIRAKILMASINA 2\/10\/2024tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 2\/10\/2024 tarihli ve 2019\/31619 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 E.A. BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2019\/31619) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 2\/10\/2024 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 G\u0130ZL\u0130L\u0130K TALEB\u0130 KABUL Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM \u00a0 \u00a0 R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7 \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU \u00a0 \u00a0 Kenan YA\u015eAR Raport\u00f6r : Muhammed Cemil KANDEM\u0130R Ba\u015fvurucu : E.A. Vekili : Av. Tuba Y\u00dcCEER \u00d6RK\u00dcP \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, asker\u00ee okulda \u00f6\u011frenime devam edilirken okuldan ili\u015fik kesilerek ba\u015fka okula nakledilme \u00fczerine a\u00e7\u0131lan tazminat davas\u0131n\u0131n incelenmeksizin reddedilmesi nedeniyle adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucunun 13\/6\/2014 tarihinde Maltepe Asker\u00ee Lisesinden mezun oldu\u011fu ve 2014-2015 e\u011fitim \u00f6\u011fretim d\u00f6neminde Kara Harp Okulunda e\u011fitimine ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 3. 15 Temmuz 2016 tarihinde ya\u015fanan darbe te\u015febb\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn ard\u0131ndan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan 25\/7\/2016 tarihli ve 669 say\u0131l\u0131 Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc Hal Kapsam\u0131nda Baz\u0131 Tedbirler Al\u0131nmas\u0131 ve Milli Savunma \u00dcniversitesi Kurulmas\u0131 ile Baz\u0131 Kanunlarda De\u011fi\u015fiklik Yap\u0131lmas\u0131na Dair Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararname’nin (669 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK) 104. maddesinde harp akademilerinin, asker\u00ee liselerin ve astsubay haz\u0131rlama okullar\u0131n\u0131n kapat\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin d\u00fczenleme yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Mezk\u00fbr KHK’n\u0131n 105. maddesi uyar\u0131nca asker\u00ee okullarda \u00f6\u011frenimine devam eden \u00f6\u011frenciler durumlar\u0131na uygun okula nakledilecektir. 669 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK’n\u0131n yay\u0131mland\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihte Kara Harp Okulunda ikinci s\u0131n\u0131ftan \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc s\u0131n\u0131fa ge\u00e7mi\u015f olan ba\u015fvurucunun bu kapsamda sivil bir \u00fcniversiteye …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27,535],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-16955","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber","category-uncategorized-tr"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n