T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u0130SMA\u0130L BAKA\u00c7 BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2022\/100579)<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 14\/5\/2025<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Recai AKYEL<\/p>\n
Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n
Selahaddin MENTE\u015e<\/p>\n
\u0130rfan F\u0130DAN<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Ayd\u0131n DEM\u0130REL<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
\u0130smail BAKA\u00c7<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, tutuklaman\u0131n hukuki olmamas\u0131 nedeniyle ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucu 14\/10\/2021 tarihinde kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme, birden fazla ki\u015fi taraf\u0131ndan silahla ya\u011fma ve cebir tehdit veya hile kullanarak ki\u015fiyi h\u00fcrriyetinden yoksun k\u0131lma su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f, 16\/10\/2021 tarihinde tutuklanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. D\u00fczce Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca (Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131) 7\/10\/2022 tarihinde d\u00fczenlenen ve 14\/10\/2022 tarihinde kabul edilen iddianamede ba\u015fvurucunun maddi \u00e7\u0131kar ama\u00e7l\u0131 silahl\u0131 su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn y\u00f6neticisi oldu\u011fu belirtilerek \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi eylemler nedeniyle cebir, tehdit veya hile kullanarak ki\u015fiyi h\u00fcrriyetinden yoksun k\u0131lma, su\u00e7 i\u015flemek amac\u0131yla \u00f6rg\u00fct kurma, birden fazla ki\u015fi taraf\u0131ndan birlikte, silahla, su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fctlerinin olu\u015fturduklar\u0131 korkutucu g\u00fc\u00e7ten yararlanarak su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne yarar sa\u011flamak amac\u0131yla ya\u011fma, ba\u015fka bir su\u00e7u i\u015fleyememekten kaynaklanan infialle \u00f6ld\u00fcrme, kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 talep edilmi\u015ftir. M\u00fc\u015fteki, tan\u0131k ve \u015f\u00fcpheli ifadelerine, HTS kay\u0131tlar\u0131na, kolluk tutanaklar\u0131 gibi delillere yer verilen iddianamede ba\u015fvurucunun y\u00f6neticisi oldu\u011fu su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc taraf\u0131ndan ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen;<\/p>\n
i. M\u00fc\u015fteki \u015f\u00fcpheli S.A.n\u0131n al\u0131konulmas\u0131,<\/p>\n
ii. M\u00fc\u015fteki \u015f\u00fcpheli E.\u00c7.nin 10\/10\/2021 tarihinde iki g\u00fcn s\u00fcreyle al\u0131konulmas\u0131, \u00f6ld\u00fcrme kast\u0131yla silahtan say\u0131lan ve ele ge\u00e7irilemeyen demir sopalarla darbedilmesi ve iple as\u0131lmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131,<\/p>\n
iii. Olay sonras\u0131 \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i olan m\u00fc\u015fteki \u015f\u00fcpheli E.\u00c7nin tekrar al\u0131konulmas\u0131,<\/p>\n
iv. Maktul S.Y.nin al\u0131konulmas\u0131, silah kabzas\u0131yla ba\u015f\u0131na vurulmak ve demir sopalarla d\u00f6v\u00fclmek suretiyle \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fclmesi eylemlerinden sorumlu oldu\u011fu belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucunun da aralar\u0131nda bulundu\u011fu alt\u0131 \u015f\u00fcphelinin tutukluluklar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6zden ge\u00e7irilmesi talep edilmi\u015ftir. D\u00fczce 1. Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fi (Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fi) taraf\u0131ndan 12\/10\/2022 tarihinde konutu terk etmeme \u015feklinde adli kontrol karar\u0131 uygulanarak ba\u015fvurucunun serbest b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir. S\u00f6z konusu karar saat 16.19’da imzalanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Karar\u0131n ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015fu \u015fekildedir:<\/p>\n
“Her ne kadar D\u00fczce Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 12\/10\/2022 tarih ve 2022\/13311 soru\u015fturma say\u0131l\u0131 yaz\u0131lar\u0131 ile \u015f\u00fcpheliler [E.Y.], [E.A.], \u0130SMA\u0130L BAKA\u00c7 VE [Y.H.]’\u0131n 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK’n\u0131n 108\/1 maddesi gere\u011fince tutukluluk durumlar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6zden ge\u00e7irilmesi ve tutukluluk hallerinin devam\u0131na karar verilmesi talep edilmi\u015f ise de; \u015f\u00fcpheli [E.Y.]’\u0131n tutukluluk halinin bir y\u0131l olmas\u0131na iki g\u00fcn kalmas\u0131, \u015f\u00fcpheli [E.A.]’un tutukluluk halinin bir y\u0131l olmas\u0131na dokuz g\u00fcn kalmas\u0131, \u015f\u00fcpheli \u0130smail Baka\u00e7’\u0131n tutukluluk halinin bir y\u0131l olmas\u0131na d\u00f6rt g\u00fcn kalmas\u0131, \u015f\u00fcpheli [Y.H.]’\u0131n tutukluluk halinin bir y\u0131l olmas\u0131na d\u00f6rt g\u00fcn kalmas\u0131, CMK’n\u0131n 102. Maddesi nazara al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda bu a\u015famadan sonra bu \u015f\u00fcpheliler y\u00f6n\u00fcnden tutukluluk durumunun devam\u0131na karar verilmesi \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fcl\u00fck ilkesini ihlal edece\u011fi, bu a\u015famadan sonra bu \u015f\u00fcpheliler hakk\u0131nda elektronik kelep\u00e7e tak\u0131lmak suretiyle ev hapsi \u015feklindeki adli kontrol tedbirinin yeterli oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, D\u00fczce Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 12\/10\/2022 tarih ve 2022\/13311 soru\u015fturma say\u0131l\u0131 talebinin k\u0131smen REDD\u0130 ile \u015f\u00fcpheliler [E.Y.], [E.A.], \u0130SMA\u0130L BAKA\u00c7 VE [Y.H.]’\u0131n \u00fczerlerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7lardan soru\u015fturma sonuna kadar s\u00fcrmek \u00fczere ADL\u0130 KONTROL ALTINA ALINMAK SURET\u0130YLE TAHL\u0130YELER\u0130NE, \u015f\u00fcpheliler ba\u015fka su\u00e7tan tutuklu ya da h\u00fck\u00fcm de\u011filse derhal SALIVER\u0130LMELER\u0130NE… [karar verildi.]”<\/p>\n
5. Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn serbest b\u0131rak\u0131lan t\u00fcm \u015f\u00fcphelilerin tekrar tutuklanmas\u0131 talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur. S\u00f6z konusu belge saat 17.28’de Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan imzalanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Belge saat 18.08’de Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fi taraf\u0131ndan okunmu\u015ftur. Talebin ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015fu \u015fekildedir;<\/p>\n
“…Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131zca ilgi say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131zla tahliyesine karar verilen \u015f\u00fcpheliler hakk\u0131nda 07\/10\/2022 tarihinde \u00fczerilerine at\u0131l\u0131 silahl\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kar ama\u00e7l\u0131 su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc kurmak, \u00f6rg\u00fcte \u00fcye olmak, bir su\u00e7u i\u015fleyememekten kaynaklanan infialle kasten adam \u00f6ld\u00fcrme, nitelikli ya\u011fmaya te\u015febb\u00fcs, kasten adam \u00f6ld\u00fcrmeye te\u015febb\u00fcs su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan D\u00fczce 2. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi’ne iddianame d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi, \u015f\u00fcphelilerin tutuklulukta ge\u00e7irdi\u011fi s\u00fcre dikkate al\u0131narak Hakimli\u011finizce tahliyesine karar verilmi\u015f ise de, \u015f\u00fcphelilerin \u00fczerilerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7lar\u0131 i\u015fledikleri hususunda kuvvetli \u015f\u00fcphe oldu\u011fu, \u00fczerilerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7lar i\u00e7in kanunun \u00f6n g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ceza miktar\u0131, su\u00e7lar\u0131n vas\u0131f ve mahiyeti, tahliye karar\u0131n\u0131n toplumda infial yarataca\u011f\u0131, ma\u011fduriyet yarataca\u011f\u0131, \u015f\u00fcphelinin \u00fczerilerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7lar dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ev hapsinin yeterli kalmayaca\u011f\u0131, \u015f\u00fcphelilerin ka\u00e7ma ihtimallerinin bulundu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmakla tahliye kararlar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131larak \u015f\u00fcphelilerin tutuklanmas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik karar verilmesi, Hakimli\u011finiz aksi kanaatte ise dosyan\u0131n N\u00f6bet\u00e7i Asliye Ceza Mahkemesi’ne g\u00f6nderilmesi rica olunur…”<\/p>\n
6. Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan ceza infaz kurumuna yaz\u0131 yaz\u0131larak Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fince serbest b\u0131rak\u0131lan aralar\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun da bulundu\u011fu \u015f\u00fcphelilerin ba\u015fka su\u00e7tan tutuklu ya da h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc olmamalar\u0131 h\u00e2linde derh\u00e2l serbest b\u0131rak\u0131lmalar\u0131 istenmi\u015ftir. S\u00f6z konusu belge saat 19.35’te imzalanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
7. Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn saat 22.17’de d\u00fczenlenen ve 22.19’de imzalanan belge ile ba\u015fvurucunun da aralar\u0131nda bulundu\u011fu \u015f\u00fcphelilerin tutuklanmalar\u0131 talep edilmi\u015ftir. S\u00f6z konusu talep saat 22.20’de Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fine ula\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Talebin ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015fu \u015fekildedir;<\/p>\n
“…\u015e\u00fcpheliler hakk\u0131nda tutuklamaya y\u00f6nelik yakalama kararlar\u0131n\u0131n yakalama ekran\u0131nda numara al\u0131namamas\u0131ndan vicahiye \u00e7evirme i\u015flemi yap\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu nedenle \u015f\u00fcphelilerin yakalama kararlar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131larak yakalama kararlar\u0131na istinaden bu \u015fekilde sevk yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verildi\u011fi,<\/p>\n
A\u015fa\u011f\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131k kimlik bilgileri yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015f\u00fcpheli mevcutlu olarak g\u00f6nderilmi\u015f olup,<\/p>\n
\u015e\u00fcphelilerin \u00fczerilerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7lar\u0131 i\u015flediklerine dair kuvvetli su\u00e7 \u015f\u00fcphesinin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6steren olgular\u0131n ve tutuklama nedeninin bulundu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmakla; <\/p>\n
\u015e\u00fcphelilerin \u00fczerilerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7un vas\u0131f ve mahiyeti, mevcut delil durumu, su\u00e7a dair yasada yaz\u0131l\u0131 cezan\u0131n \u00fcst haddi dikkate al\u0131narak 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK\u2019n\u0131n 100. vd. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca TUTUKLANMALARINA,<\/p>\n
Karar verilmesi kamu ad\u0131na talep olunur….”<\/p>\n
8. Sulh Ceza Hakimli\u011fi taraf\u0131ndan ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn ba\u015fvurucunun birden fazla ki\u015fi taraf\u0131ndan birlikte, silahla, su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fctlerinin olu\u015fturduklar\u0131 korkutucu g\u00fc\u00e7ten yararlanarak su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne yarar sa\u011flamak amac\u0131yla ya\u011fma, ba\u015fka bir su\u00e7u i\u015fleyememekten kaynaklanan infialle \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan tutuklanmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir. S\u00f6z konusu sorgu zapt\u0131 saat 23.47’de imzalanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Karar\u0131n ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015fu \u015fekildedir;<\/p>\n
“…1-T\u00fcm haz\u0131rl\u0131k dosyas\u0131 bir b\u00fct\u00fcn olarak de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde \u015f\u00fcpheliler [E.Y.], \u0130smail Baka\u00e7, [Y.A.] ve [E.A.]’un \u00fczerilerine \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 bulunan su\u00e7lar\u0131n ([E.A.]’un, [E.]’a y\u00f6nelik kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7u y\u00f6n\u00fcnden) vas\u0131f ve mahiyeti, \u015f\u00fcphelilerin at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7u i\u015fledikleri hususunda kuvvetli su\u00e7 \u015f\u00fcphesinin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6steren \u015f\u00fcphelilerin \u00e7eli\u015fkili beyanlar\u0131, dosya kapsam\u0131ndaki kamera kay\u0131tlar\u0131, cdler, g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc inceleme tutanaklar\u0131, bilgi alma tutanaklar\u0131, kolluk tutanaklar\u0131 vb. somut delillerin bulunmas\u0131, at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7lar\u0131n CMK’n\u0131n 100.maddesinde yaz\u0131l\u0131 olan katalog su\u00e7lardan olmas\u0131 ve bu nedenle tutuklama nedeninin bulundu\u011funun varsay\u0131labilece\u011fi, at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7 i\u00e7in yasada yaz\u0131l\u0131 olan cezan\u0131n alt ve \u00fcst haddine g\u00f6re ve \u015f\u00fcphelilerin alabilece\u011fi muhtemel cezaya oranla tutuklaman\u0131n haks\u0131zl\u0131\u011fa yol a\u00e7acak nitelikte orant\u0131s\u0131z ve \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcs\u00fcz olmayaca\u011f\u0131, bu ahval i\u00e7inde \u015f\u00fcphelilerin serbest kalmalar\u0131 halinde ka\u00e7ma, saklanma, olay ile ilgili ki\u015fileri y\u00f6nlendirme veya bu ki\u015filere bask\u0131 yapma \u015feklinde vb. davran\u0131\u015flarla delil karartma ihtimalinin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu nedenlerle, \u015f\u00fcpheliler hakk\u0131nda tutuklama ile hedeflenen amaca adli kontrol tedbiri ile ula\u015fma imkan\u0131n\u0131n bulunmamas\u0131 ve adli kontrol tedbirinin bu a\u015famada yetersiz kalaca\u011f\u0131 ve soru\u015fturman\u0131n yarar\u0131 i\u00e7in tutuklama tedbirinin bu a\u015famada gereklilik arz etti\u011fi hususlar\u0131 g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurularak CMK’n\u0131n 100. ve devam\u0131 maddeleri uyar\u0131nca ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 TUTUKLANMALARINA… [karar verildi.]”<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fvurucunun Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011finin karar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz\u0131 D\u00fczce 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesince 4\/11\/2022 tarihinde reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
10. Ba\u015fvurucu, itiraz\u0131n kesin olarak reddi karar\u0131n\u0131 8\/11\/2022 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra 15\/11\/2022 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
11. 27\/10\/2023 tarihinde D\u00fczce 2. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucunun kasten yaralama ve kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan mahk\u00fbmiyetine, di\u011fer su\u00e7lardan beraatine ve h\u00fck\u00fcmle birlikte tutukluluk h\u00e2linin devam\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
12. B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 28\/6\/2024 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucunun kasten yaralama su\u00e7u y\u00f6n\u00fcnden mahk\u00fbmiyetine y\u00f6nelik istinaf talebini kesin olarak, kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7u y\u00f6n\u00fcnden mahk\u00fbmiyetine y\u00f6nelik istinaf talebini ise temyiz yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere reddetmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
13. Yarg\u0131lama Yarg\u0131tay nezdinde derdesttir.<\/p>\n
14. Ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
15. Ba\u015fvurucu, konutu terk etmeme \u015feklindeki adli kontrol tedbiri uygulanarak serbest b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen tahliye edilmeden yeniden tutuklanmas\u0131n\u0131n hukuki olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia etmi\u015ftir. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) yap\u0131lacak incelemede Anayasa ve mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmleri do\u011frultusunda somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc bildirmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
16. Ba\u015fvuru, ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
17. Anayasa Mahkemesi i\u00e7tihad\u0131na g\u00f6re tutuklama tedbirinin uyguland\u0131\u011f\u0131 yarg\u0131lama neticesinde verilen karar\u0131n kesinle\u015fmi\u015f olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde ba\u015fvurucunun tutuklaman\u0131n hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu iddias\u0131na y\u00f6nelik olarak 4\/12\/2004 tarihli ve 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu’nun 141. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (a) bendi kapsam\u0131nda tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7abilece\u011fi kabul edilmi\u015ftir (Re\u015fat Ertan [1. B.], B. No: 2013\/5700, 15\/4\/2015, \u00a7 26; \u00d6mer K\u00f6se [2. B.], B. No: 2014\/12036, 16\/11\/2016, \u00a7 34; Eyy\u00fcp G\u00fcne\u015f [GK], B. No: 2017\/28308, 21\/10\/2021, \u00a7 88; Murat A\u011f\u0131rel ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2020\/11655, 7\/4\/2022, \u00a7\u00a7 23-26). Somut olayda ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131ndaki h\u00fck\u00fcm hen\u00fcz kesinle\u015fmemi\u015f olmakla, ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketildi\u011fi sonucuna var\u0131lan ve a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmay\u0131p kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
18. Ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131na y\u00f6nelik m\u00fcdahale, temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerin ola\u011fan d\u00f6nemde s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fctlerin belirlendi\u011fi Anayasa’n\u0131n 13. maddesinde belirtilen ko\u015fullar\u0131 yerine getirmedi\u011fi m\u00fcddet\u00e7e Anayasa’n\u0131n 19. maddesinin ihlalini te\u015fkil edecektir. Bu sebeple m\u00fcdahalenin Anayasa’n\u0131n 13. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen ve tutuklama tedbirinin niteli\u011fine uygun d\u00fc\u015fen; kanun taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclme, Anayasa’n\u0131n 19. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda belirtilen hakl\u0131 sebeplerden bir veya daha fazlas\u0131na dayanma ve \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fcl\u00fck ilkesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmama ko\u015fullar\u0131na uygun olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesi gerekir (Halas Aslan [1. B.], B. No: 2014\/4994, 16\/2\/2017, \u00a7\u00a7 53, 54; Sel\u00e7uk \u00d6zdemir [GK], B. No: 2016\/49158, 26\/7\/2017, \u00a7 60).<\/p>\n
19. Somut olayda \u00f6ncelikle ba\u015fvurucunun tutuklanmas\u0131n\u0131n kanuni dayana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesi gerekir. Ba\u015fvurucu 16\/10\/2021 tarihinde kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme, birden fazla ki\u015fi taraf\u0131ndan silahla ya\u011fma ve cebir, tehdit veya hile kullanarak ki\u015fiyi h\u00fcrriyetinden yoksun k\u0131lma su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan ilk kez tutuklanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Tutuklulu\u011funun g\u00f6zden ge\u00e7irilmesi talebi \u00fczerine 12\/10\/2022 tarihinde Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fi ba\u015fvurucunun konutu terk etmeme \u015feklinde adli kontrol uygulanarak serbest b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015f; yap\u0131lan itiraz sonras\u0131 ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn birden fazla ki\u015fi taraf\u0131ndan birlikte, silahla, su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fctlerinin olu\u015fturduklar\u0131 korkutucu g\u00fc\u00e7ten yararlanarak su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne yarar sa\u011flamak amac\u0131yla ya\u011fma, ba\u015fka bir su\u00e7u i\u015fleyememekten kaynaklanan infialle \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 100. maddesi uyar\u0131nca ba\u015fvurucu tekrar tutuklanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (bkz. \u00a7\u00a7 2, 7). Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda uygulanan tutuklama tedbirinin kanuni dayana\u011f\u0131 bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
20. Kanuni dayana\u011f\u0131 bulundu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan tutuklama tedbirinin me\u015fru bir amac\u0131n\u0131n olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc incelenmeden \u00f6nce tutuklaman\u0131n \u00f6n ko\u015fulu olan su\u00e7un i\u015flendi\u011fine dair kuvvetli belirti bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
21. Anayasa’n\u0131n 19. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda; su\u00e7lulu\u011fu hakk\u0131nda kuvvetli belirti bulunan ki\u015filerin ancak ka\u00e7malar\u0131n\u0131, delilleri yok etmelerini veya de\u011fi\u015ftirmelerini \u00f6nlemek maksad\u0131yla veya bunlar gibi tutuklamay\u0131 zorunlu k\u0131lan ve kanunda g\u00f6sterilen di\u011fer h\u00e2llerde h\u00e2kim karar\u0131yla tutuklanabilecekleri belirtilmi\u015ftir (Halas Aslan, \u00a7 57). Buna g\u00f6re tutuklama ancak “su\u00e7lulu\u011fu hakk\u0131nda kuvvetli belirti bulunan ki\u015filer” bak\u0131m\u0131ndan m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr. Bir ba\u015fka anlat\u0131mla tutuklamada me\u015fru bir amac\u0131n olmas\u0131 i\u00e7in \u00f6n ko\u015ful, ki\u015finin su\u00e7lulu\u011fu hakk\u0131nda kuvvetli belirtinin bulunmas\u0131d\u0131r. Bu husus, tutuklama tedbiri i\u00e7in aranan olmazsa olmaz unsurdur. Bunun i\u00e7in su\u00e7laman\u0131n kuvvetli say\u0131labilecek inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 delillerle desteklenmesi gerekir. \u0130nand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 delil say\u0131labilecek olgu ve bilgilerin niteli\u011fi b\u00fcy\u00fck \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc \u015fartlar\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r (Mustafa Ali Balbay [1. B.], B. No: 2012\/1272, 4\/12\/2013, \u00a7 72).<\/p>\n
22. Bu noktada, her somut olayda tutuklaman\u0131n \u00f6n ko\u015fulu olan su\u00e7un i\u015flendi\u011fine dair kuvvetli belirtinin olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, tutuklama nedenlerinin bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ve tutuklama tedbirinin \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn takdiri \u00f6ncelikle an\u0131lan tedbiri uygulayan yarg\u0131 mercilerine ait oldu\u011funun zira bu konuda taraflarla ve delillerle do\u011frudan temas h\u00e2linde olan yarg\u0131 mercilerinin Anayasa Mahkemesine k\u0131yasla daha iyi konumda oldu\u011funun yeniden ifade edilmesi gerekir (G\u00fclser Y\u0131ld\u0131r\u0131m (2) [GK], B. No: 2016\/40170, 16\/11\/2017 \u00a7\u00a7 123, 124).<\/p>\n
23. Anayasa Mahkemesi; ki\u015finin su\u00e7la itham edilebilmesi i\u00e7in yakalama veya tutuklama an\u0131nda delillerin yeterli d\u00fczeyde toplanm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131n\u0131n mutlaka gerekli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 zira tutuklulu\u011fun amac\u0131n\u0131n, y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturma ve\/veya kovu\u015fturma s\u0131ras\u0131nda ki\u015finin tutuklanmas\u0131n\u0131n temelini olu\u015fturan \u015f\u00fcphelerin do\u011frulu\u011funu kan\u0131tlayarak ya da ortadan kald\u0131rarak adli s\u00fcreci daha sa\u011fl\u0131kl\u0131 bir \u015fekilde y\u00fcr\u00fctmek oldu\u011funu, buna g\u00f6re su\u00e7 isnad\u0131na esas te\u015fkil edecek \u015f\u00fcphelere dayanak olu\u015fturan olgular ile ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131n\u0131n sonraki a\u015famalar\u0131nda tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lacak olan ve mahk\u00fbmiyete gerek\u00e7e olu\u015fturacak olgular\u0131n ayn\u0131 d\u00fczeyde de\u011ferlendirilmemesi gerekti\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir (Mustafa Ali Balbay, \u00a7 73; Mehmet Haberal [1. B.], B. No: 2012\/849, 4\/12\/2013, \u00a7 71).<\/p>\n
24. Somut olayda; ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen iddianamede m\u00fc\u015fteki, tan\u0131k ve \u015f\u00fcpheli ifadeleri d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda HTS kay\u0131tlar\u0131, kolluk tutanaklar\u0131 gibi bir\u00e7ok delile yer verilerek ba\u015fvurucunun y\u00f6netici oldu\u011fu \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi su\u00e7 te\u015fkil eden eylemlerinden sorumlu oldu\u011fu ifade edilmi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7 3). Y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen yarg\u0131lama sonunda ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc kurulmu\u015f ve kasten yaralama su\u00e7u y\u00f6n\u00fcnden verilen mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131 kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir. Kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7undan kurulan mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fcne y\u00f6nelik istinaf talebi ise temyiz yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere reddedilmi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7\u00a7 11, 12).<\/p>\n
25. \u00d6te yandan tutuklama a\u015famas\u0131nda su\u00e7un s\u00fcbutu gerekmedi\u011fi i\u00e7in isnat edilen eylemin tutuklama karar\u0131nda belirtilen su\u00e7tan ba\u015fka bir su\u00e7u olu\u015fturma ihtimali olmas\u0131 tutuklama karar\u0131n\u0131 salt bu nedenle hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 h\u00e2le getirmeyecektir. Ayr\u0131ca Anayasa Mahkemesi bir\u00e7ok karar\u0131nda somut olgular i\u00e7eren tan\u0131k anlat\u0131mlar\u0131n\u0131 su\u00e7 \u015f\u00fcphesini do\u011frulayan kuvvetli bir belirti olarak kabul etmi\u015ftir (Metin Evecen [2. B.], B. No: 2017\/744, 4\/4\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 47-52, Recep Uygun [2. B.], B. No: 2016\/76351, 12\/6\/2018, \u00a7 43; \u0130smail \u00c7\u0131tak [1. B.], B. No: 2016\/78629, 28\/11\/2019, \u00a7 52; Y.G. [1. B.], B. No: 2017\/5933, 9\/1\/2020, \u00a7 55; \u0130brahim Okur [1. B.], B. No: 2016\/50394, 27\/2\/2020, \u00a7 82; Mustafa Onuk [2. B.], B. No: 2016\/21484, 9\/7\/2020, \u00a7\u00a7 49-52; Yusuf Erdo\u011fan [1. B.], B. No: 2017\/11828, 10\/2\/2021, \u00a7 46).<\/p>\n
26. T\u00fcm bu bilgiler \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda tutuklamaya esas deliller ve dosya kapsam\u0131 g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, ba\u015fvurucunun isnat edilen eylemleri i\u015fledi\u011fine y\u00f6nelik kuvvetli su\u00e7 \u015f\u00fcphesinin mevcut oldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin kabul\u00fcn temelsiz ve keyf\u00ee oldu\u011fu s\u00f6ylenemeyecektir.<\/p>\n
27. Di\u011fer taraftan ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda uygulanan ve kuvvetli su\u00e7 \u015f\u00fcphesinin bulunmas\u0131 \u015feklindeki \u00f6n ko\u015fulu yerine gelmi\u015f olan tutuklama tedbirinin me\u015fru bir amac\u0131n\u0131n olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ve tutuklaman\u0131n \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
28. 12\/10\/2022 tarihinde Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fince ba\u015fvurucu y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yap\u0131lan de\u011ferlendirmede \u00f6zetle tutuklulu\u011fun devam\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fc olmayaca\u011f\u0131, konutu terk etmeme tedbiri \u015feklindeki adli kontrol\u00fcn yeterli olaca\u011f\u0131 ifade edilerek tutuklama tedbirinin sonland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir. Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca yap\u0131lan itiraz sonras\u0131 Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fince bu sefer kuvvetli su\u00e7 \u015f\u00fcphesinin bulundu\u011fu belirtilerek su\u00e7un niteli\u011fi, delil durumu yan\u0131nda tutuklama ile hedeflenen amaca adli kontrol tedbiri ile ula\u015fma imk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131n bulunmamas\u0131 ve adli kontrol tedbirinin bu a\u015famada yetersiz kalaca\u011f\u0131 ve soru\u015fturman\u0131n yarar\u0131 i\u00e7in tutuklama tedbirinin bu a\u015famada gereklilik arz etti\u011fi ifade edilerek ba\u015fvurucunun tutuklanmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7\u00a7 4, 5, 7, 8). Buna y\u00f6nelik itiraz A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan 4\/11\/2022 tarihinde kesin olarak reddedilmi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7 9).<\/p>\n
29. Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fince tutuklulu\u011fun devam\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcs\u00fcz olaca\u011f\u0131 ve adli kontrol tedbirinin yeterli oldu\u011fu kanaatiyle verilen ki\u015finin tutukluluk h\u00e2linin sona erdirilmesi karar\u0131na yap\u0131lan itiraz sonras\u0131nda Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fi taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6nceki karar\u0131ndan d\u00f6nmeyi gerektirir yeni bir tespit ya da delil bulunmaks\u0131z\u0131n yeniden tutuklama karar verildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fince tahliye ile birlikte h\u00fckmedilen konutu terk etmemek \u015feklindeki adli kontrol\u00fcn niteli\u011fi de g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde, tutuklama tedbirini zorunlu k\u0131lan nedenlerin neler oldu\u011funun ve tutuklama tedbirinin neden \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fc g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn tutuklamaya ili\u015fkin kararlarda yeterince ifade edilmedi\u011fi, bu hususlar\u0131n somut olay\u0131n \u00f6zelliklerinden deanla\u015f\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kanaatine var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
30. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda verilen tahliye karar\u0131na yap\u0131lan itiraz sonras\u0131nda ayn\u0131 H\u00e2kimlik\u00e7e ayn\u0131 soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda uygulanan ikinci tutuklama tedbiri nedeniyle ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M <\/p>\n
31. Ba\u015fvurucu; ihlalin tespiti, serbest b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131 ve 30.000 TL manevi, 10.000 TL maddi tazminat talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
32. Ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc kuruldu\u011fu, ba\u015fvurucunun tutulmas\u0131n\u0131n mahk\u00fbmiyete ba\u011fl\u0131 tutmaya d\u00f6nd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc anla\u015f\u0131lmakla ihlalin ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
33. Eski h\u00e2le getirme kural\u0131 \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde ihlalin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n b\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcyle ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in h\u00e2len mahkumiyete ba\u011fl\u0131 tutulan ba\u015fvurucuya manevi zararlar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda talebiyle ba\u011fl\u0131 kal\u0131narak 30.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00f6denmesine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
34. Ba\u015fvurucu, maddi zarara ili\u015fkin olarak bilgi\/belge sunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan maddi tazminat talebinin reddine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 19. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
C. Ba\u015fvurucuya net 30.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE, tazminata ili\u015fkin di\u011fer taleplerin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. 664,10 TL yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvurucuya \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. \u00d6demelerin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
F. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin bilgi i\u00e7in D\u00fczce 1. Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fine G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE, <\/p>\n
G. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 14\/5\/2025 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 14\/5\/2025 tarihli ve 2022\/100579 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR \u0130SMA\u0130L BAKA\u00c7 BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2022\/100579) Karar Tarihi: 14\/5\/2025 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Recai AKYEL Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ Selahaddin MENTE\u015e \u0130rfan F\u0130DAN Raport\u00f6r : Ayd\u0131n DEM\u0130REL Ba\u015fvurucu : \u0130smail BAKA\u00c7 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, tutuklaman\u0131n hukuki olmamas\u0131 nedeniyle ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu 14\/10\/2021 tarihinde kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme, birden fazla ki\u015fi taraf\u0131ndan silahla ya\u011fma ve cebir tehdit veya hile kullanarak ki\u015fiyi h\u00fcrriyetinden yoksun k\u0131lma su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f, 16\/10\/2021 tarihinde tutuklanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 3. D\u00fczce Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca (Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131) 7\/10\/2022 tarihinde d\u00fczenlenen ve 14\/10\/2022 tarihinde kabul edilen iddianamede ba\u015fvurucunun maddi \u00e7\u0131kar ama\u00e7l\u0131 silahl\u0131 su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn y\u00f6neticisi oldu\u011fu belirtilerek \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi eylemler nedeniyle cebir, tehdit veya hile kullanarak ki\u015fiyi h\u00fcrriyetinden yoksun k\u0131lma, su\u00e7 i\u015flemek amac\u0131yla \u00f6rg\u00fct kurma, birden fazla ki\u015fi taraf\u0131ndan birlikte, silahla, su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fctlerinin olu\u015fturduklar\u0131 korkutucu g\u00fc\u00e7ten yararlanarak su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne yarar sa\u011flamak amac\u0131yla ya\u011fma, ba\u015fka bir su\u00e7u i\u015fleyememekten kaynaklanan infialle \u00f6ld\u00fcrme, kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 talep edilmi\u015ftir. M\u00fc\u015fteki, tan\u0131k ve \u015f\u00fcpheli ifadelerine, HTS kay\u0131tlar\u0131na, kolluk tutanaklar\u0131 gibi delillere yer verilen iddianamede ba\u015fvurucunun y\u00f6neticisi oldu\u011fu su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc taraf\u0131ndan ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen; i. M\u00fc\u015fteki \u015f\u00fcpheli S.A.n\u0131n al\u0131konulmas\u0131, ii. M\u00fc\u015fteki \u015f\u00fcpheli E.\u00c7.nin 10\/10\/2021 tarihinde iki g\u00fcn s\u00fcreyle al\u0131konulmas\u0131, \u00f6ld\u00fcrme …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-152892","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n