T.C.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay<\/p>\n
Ceza Genel Kurulu<\/p>\n
2008\/88 E., 2008\/184 K.<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
Karar\u0131 veren
\nYarg\u0131tay Dairesi : 1. Ceza Dairesi
\nMahkemesi :A\u011f\u0131r Ceza
\nG\u00fcn\u00fc : 24.09.2007
\nSay\u0131s\u0131 : 296-374<\/p>\n
San\u0131k …\u2019\u0131n insan \u00f6ld\u00fcrmeye kalk\u0131\u015fma su\u00e7undan dolay\u0131 uygulamada daha lehe sonu\u00e7 verdi\u011fi belirtilerek 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCY\u2019n\u0131n 81, 35\/2, 29 ve 62 maddeleri uyar\u0131nca 1 y\u0131l 10 ay 15 g\u00fcn hapis cezas\u0131yla cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ve hak yoksunlu\u011funa ili\u015fkin \u0130zmir 3. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinden verilen 01.02.2006 g\u00fcn ve 107-17 say\u0131l\u0131 h\u00fckm\u00fcn san\u0131k m\u00fcdafilerince temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine dosyay\u0131 inceleyen Yarg\u0131tay 1. Ceza Dairesince 03.07.2007 g\u00fcn ve 7543-5426 say\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n
\u201cSan\u0131\u011f\u0131n, geceleyin, kavga ortam\u0131nda, ma\u011fduru b\u0131\u00e7akla, i\u00e7 organ yaralanmas\u0131na neden olmayacak \u015fekilde bir kez yaralad\u0131\u011f\u0131 olayda, hayati b\u00f6lgelerin hedef se\u00e7ildi\u011fine, eyle\u00acmin engel nedeniyle s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclemedi\u011fine dair delil bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 halde, yaralama su\u00e7u yerine \u00f6ld\u00fcrmeye te\u015febb\u00fcsten yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde karar verilmesi\u201d isabetsizli\u011finden bozulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
Yerel Mahkeme 24.09.2007 g\u00fcn ve 296-374 say\u0131 ile; b\u0131\u00e7a\u011f\u0131n hayati b\u00f6lgeye isabet etmesi kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kast\u0131n\u0131n insan \u00f6ld\u00fcrmeye y\u00f6nelik oldu\u011funun a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131\u011fa kavu\u015ftu\u011funu belirterek \u00f6nceki h\u00fck\u00fcmde direnmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Bu h\u00fckm\u00fcn de san\u0131k m\u00fcdafii ile Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine dosya Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n \u201ch\u00fckm\u00fcn bozulmas\u0131\u201d g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc i\u00e7eren 26.03.2008 g\u00fcnl\u00fc tebli\u011fnamesiyle Yarg\u0131tay Birinci Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6nderilmekle, Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulun\u2019da de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015f ve a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki gerek\u00e7elerle karara ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
T\u00dcRK M\u0130LLET\u0130 ADINA
\nCEZA GENEL KURULU KARARI<\/p>\n
San\u0131\u011f\u0131n kasten insan \u00f6ld\u00fcrmeye kalk\u0131\u015fma su\u00e7undan cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilen olayda \u00d6zel Daire ile Yerel Mahkeme aras\u0131ndaki uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k, su\u00e7un nitelendirilmesine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
\u0130ncelenen olayda;<\/p>\n
San\u0131k … taraf\u0131ndan i\u015fletilen \u0130zmir \u015eirinyer\u2019deki Yal\u00e7\u0131n PUB isimli birahaneye 27 Temmuz 2003 g\u00fcn\u00fc 24:00 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda alkoll\u00fc bir \u015fekilde gelen ve bir s\u00fcre arkada\u015f\u0131yla birlikte i\u00e7ki i\u00e7tikten sonra birahanenin kapanaca\u011f\u0131 yolundaki uyar\u0131 sonras\u0131nda tart\u0131\u015fma \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131p hesab\u0131 \u00f6demeden ayr\u0131lmak isteyen ma\u011fdur …\u2019\u0131n d\u0131\u015far\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131ld\u0131ktan birka\u00e7 dakika sonra i\u015fyerinin \u00f6n\u00fcne b\u0131\u00e7akla gelip birahanenin camlar\u0131n\u0131 k\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131, personeliyle birlikte d\u0131\u015far\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kan san\u0131k …\u2019\u0131n uzakla\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6ylemesine kar\u015f\u0131n ma\u011fdurun i\u015fyeri \u00f6n\u00fcnden ayr\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n bir ara f\u0131rsat\u0131n\u0131 bularak ma\u011fdurun elindeki b\u0131\u00e7a\u011f\u0131 m\u00fccadele ederek ald\u0131\u011f\u0131, akabinde ma\u011fdurun zorla birahane \u00f6n\u00fcnden uzakla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u0131rada gece karanl\u0131\u011f\u0131nda \u00e7\u0131kan kavgada san\u0131\u011f\u0131n rastgele sallad\u0131\u011f\u0131 b\u0131\u00e7ak darbesinin ma\u011fdurun kar\u0131n b\u00f6lgesine isabet etti\u011fi, i\u00e7 organ yaralanmas\u0131na neden olmayan kesici delici alet yaras\u0131 nedeniyle ma\u011fdurun hayati tehlike ge\u00e7irecek bi\u00e7imde yaraland\u0131\u011f\u0131 dosyadaki kan\u0131tlardan anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Etkili eylem su\u00e7u ile kasten insan \u00f6ld\u00fcrmeye kalk\u0131\u015fma su\u00e7u aras\u0131ndaki ay\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 kriter manevi unsurun farkl\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na dayan\u0131r. Birinci durumda sadece daha hafif sonu\u00e7 (darp ve yaralama) istenilmi\u015f olup daha a\u011f\u0131r sonu\u00e7 (\u00f6l\u00fcm) istenilmi\u015f de\u011fildir. Fail daha a\u011f\u0131r sonucun ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesini istedi\u011fi takdirde, kast\u0131n insan \u00f6ld\u00fcrmeye y\u00f6nelik oldu\u011fu kabul edilir.<\/p>\n
Sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 bilerek ve isteyerek fiili i\u015fleme iradesi olan ve failin i\u00e7 d\u00fcnyas\u0131n\u0131 ilgilendiren kast, failin olay \u00f6ncesi, olay s\u0131ras\u0131 ve olay sonras\u0131 davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131 \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fc al\u0131narak belirlenmelidir. \u00d6ld\u00fcrme kast\u0131n\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ise;<\/p>\n
a) Fail ile ma\u011fdur aras\u0131nda olay \u00f6ncesine dayal\u0131, \u00f6ld\u00fcrmeyi gerektirir bir husumetin bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131,<\/p>\n
b) Olayda kullan\u0131lan vas\u0131tan\u0131n \u00f6ld\u00fcrmeye elveri\u015fli olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131,<\/p>\n
c) Ma\u011fdurdaki darbe say\u0131s\u0131 ve \u015fiddeti,<\/p>\n
d) Darbelerin vuruldu\u011fu b\u00f6lgenin hayati \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131y\u0131p ta\u015f\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131,<\/p>\n
e) Failin fiiline kendili\u011finden mi, yoksa engel bir nedenden dolay\u0131 m\u0131 son verdi\u011fi,<\/p>\n
f) Olay sonras\u0131 ma\u011fdura y\u00f6nelik davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131, ba\u015fka bir anlat\u0131mla olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc t\u00fcm \u00f6zellikleri dikkate al\u0131narak saptanmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Bu a\u00e7\u0131klamalar \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda somut olay de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde; geceleyin, kavgan\u0131n hareketli ortam\u0131nda, rastgele sallad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tek b\u0131\u00e7ak darbesi ile ma\u011fduru i\u00e7 organ yaralanmas\u0131na neden olmayacak bi\u00e7imde yaralayan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n hayati b\u00f6lgeleri \u00f6zellikle se\u00e7ti\u011fine ve eylemini s\u00fcrd\u00fcrmesine mani bir hal bulundu\u011funa dair kan\u0131t da mevcut olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6re, olayda yaralama kast\u0131 ile hareket etti\u011finin kabul\u00fc gerekmektedir. Bu itibarla, Yerel Mahkeme direnme h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn bozulmas\u0131na karar verilmelidir.<\/p>\n
SONU\u00c7 :<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle;<\/p>\n
1-Yerel Mahkeme direnme h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn BOZULMASINA,<\/p>\n
2-Dosyan\u0131n mahalline g\u00f6nderilmek \u00fczere Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na tevdiine, 08.07.2008 g\u00fcn\u00fc oybirli\u011fi ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n
—<\/p>\n
T.C.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay<\/p>\n
Ceza Genel Kurulu<\/p>\n
2003\/1-226 E., 2003\/229 K.<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
Adam \u00f6ld\u00fcrmeye tam kalk\u0131\u015fmak ve 6136 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan a\u00e7\u0131lan kamu davalar\u0131nda, de\u011fi\u015fen su\u00e7 vasf\u0131 uyar\u0131nca san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, TCY.n\u0131n 456\/2, 457\/1, 51\/1, 55\/3 ve 59\/2 maddeleri uyar\u0131nca 1 y\u0131l 1 ay 10 g\u00fcn hapis, 6136 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 13\/1,55\/3,59\/2 ve 647 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 4. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca 659.100.000 lira a\u011f\u0131r para cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, su\u00e7a konu tabanca, \u015farj\u00f6r ve iki kovan\u0131n zoral\u0131m\u0131na, hakk\u0131nda TCY.n\u0131n 40. maddesinin uygulanmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin, \u00dcsk\u00fcdar 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesince verilen, 28.02.2001 g\u00fcn ve 336\/99 say\u0131l\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcm, C.Savc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n adam \u00f6ld\u00fcrmeye kalk\u0131\u015fmak su\u00e7una y\u00f6nelik aleyhe temyizi \u00fczerine, dosyay\u0131 inceleyen Yarg\u0131tay 1. Ceza Dairesince 21.12.2001 g\u00fcn ve 3407-4681 say\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n
“San\u0131\u011f\u0131n yak\u0131n mesafeden hedef se\u00e7erek ma\u011fdurun hayati b\u00f6lgelerine do\u011fru birden fazla yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 at\u0131\u015fla onu raporunda belirtildi\u011fi \u015fekilde yaralad\u0131\u011f\u0131, dosya i\u00e7eri\u011fi deliller ve \u00f6zellikle haz\u0131rl\u0131k a\u015famas\u0131nda beyanlar\u0131na ba\u015fvurulan ma\u011fdurun ve tan\u0131klar\u0131n anlat\u0131mlar\u0131 ile anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmekle, \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc etkisi a\u015fikar silah\u0131n do\u011frudan hedef se\u00e7ilip ate\u015flenmesi suretiyle san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kast\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6ld\u00fcrmeye y\u00f6nelik olaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fcnde zorunluluk bulundu\u011fundan fiiline uyan TCK.nun 448, 62, 51\/1, 55 ve 59. maddeleri ile tecziyesi gerekti\u011fi halde, olu\u015f ve delillere uygun d\u00fc\u015fmeyen gerek\u00e7elerle yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde su\u00e7a vas\u0131f verilmesi” isabetsizli\u011finden oy\u00e7oklu\u011fuyla bozulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
Yerel Mahkemece 27.1.2003 g\u00fcn ve 56\/27 say\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n
“Eylemde hedef g\u00f6zetilmesi, ma\u011fdurun yaralanm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 ve kullan\u0131lan silah\u0131n \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc nitelikte olmas\u0131, \u00f6ld\u00fcrmeye kalk\u0131\u015fma su\u00e7unun maddi unsurudur. Bu \u00f6\u011felerin mevcudiyeti \u00f6ld\u00fcrme kast\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011funun kabul\u00fcne yeterli olmay\u0131p, manevi unsur olan kast\u0131n mevcut olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n “olay\u0131n sebep, ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7 ve geli\u015fimi, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kararl\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve hareketi, olay\u0131n seyir ve istikameti, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n amac\u0131 ve meydana gelen sonuca” g\u00f6re de\u011ferlendirilip saptanmas\u0131 gerekmektedir. Ma\u011fdurun yaralanmas\u0131ndan sonra ortam ve olanak bulundu\u011fu halde san\u0131\u011f\u0131n bir daha ate\u015f etmedi\u011fi, olayda san\u0131k ile ma\u011fdur aras\u0131nda olay \u00f6ncesi veya esnas\u0131nda \u00f6ld\u00fcrme kast\u0131n\u0131n mevcudiyetinin kabul\u00fcn\u00fc gerektirecek bir husumetin de saptanamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 dosya i\u00e7eri\u011finden anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Bu durumda sadece maddi \u00f6\u011felere dayan\u0131larak \u00f6ld\u00fcrme kas\u0131t ve iradesinin mevcut oldu\u011funun kabul\u00fc ceza hukuku mant\u0131\u011f\u0131na uygun de\u011fildir.” gerek\u00e7esiyle ilk h\u00fck\u00fcmde direnilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Bu h\u00fckm\u00fcn de O Yer C.Savc\u0131s\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine dosya, Yarg\u0131tay C.Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n “bozma” istekli 45361 say\u0131l\u0131 tebli\u011fnamesi ile Birinci Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011fa g\u00f6nderilmekle, Ceza Genel Kurulunca okundu, gere\u011fi konu\u015fulup d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc;<\/p>\n
CEZA GENEL KURULU KARARI<\/p>\n
\u00d6zel Daire ile Yerel Mahkeme aras\u0131ndaki hukuki uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eyleminin adam \u00f6ld\u00fcrmeye tam kalk\u0131\u015fma su\u00e7unu mu, yoksa yaralama su\u00e7unu mu olu\u015fturdu\u011fu noktas\u0131nda toplanmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Ancak uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k konusunun esas\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesine ge\u00e7ilmeden \u00f6nce, \u00c7ocuk Mahkemelerinin Kurulu\u015fu, G\u00f6rev ve Yarg\u0131lama Us\u00fclleri Hakk\u0131ndaki Yasan\u0131n, \u00e7ocuk mahkemelerinin g\u00f6revini d\u00fczenleyen 6. maddesinde 30.7.2003 g\u00fcn ve 4963 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa ile yap\u0131lan de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fin su\u00e7 tarihinde 15-18 ya\u015f grubu i\u00e7inde bulunan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n hukuki durumunu etkileyip etkilemeyece\u011finin belirlenmesinde zorunluluk bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
15 ya\u015f\u0131n\u0131 bitirmeyen k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fckler taraf\u0131ndan i\u015flenen ve genel mahkemelerin g\u00f6revine giren su\u00e7larla ilgili davalar\u0131n \u00e7ocuk mahkemelerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclece\u011fine ili\u015fkin 2253 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 6. maddesinde, 4963 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa ile yap\u0131lan de\u011fi\u015fiklikle, maddede yer alan “15” ibaresi “onsekiz” olarak de\u011fi\u015ftirilerek, \u00e7ocuk mahkemelerinde yarg\u0131lanma ya\u015f\u0131 15’den 18’e \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, bu \u015fekilde, \u00e7ocuk mahkemelerinin kurulmu\u015f bulundu\u011fu yerler ve yarg\u0131 \u00e7evrelerinde, genel mahkemelerin g\u00f6rev alan\u0131na giren su\u00e7lar\u0131 i\u015fleyen 15-18 ya\u015f grubundaki ki\u015filerin de \u00e7ocuk mahkemelerinde yarg\u0131lanacaklar\u0131 esas\u0131 getirilmi\u015f ancak 2253 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n belirtilen maddesi d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda di\u011fer maddelerinde herhangi bir de\u011fi\u015fiklik yap\u0131lmamak suretiyle, bu gruptaki ki\u015filer hakk\u0131nda yaln\u0131zca g\u00f6revli mahkemenin de\u011fi\u015ftirilmesi ile yetinilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Bu d\u00fczenlemenin, de\u011fi\u015fiklikten \u00f6nce h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmu\u015f olan davalar\u0131 nas\u0131l etkileyece\u011fi, sorunu, yarg\u0131lama usul yasalar\u0131n\u0131n zaman bak\u0131m\u0131ndan uygulanmas\u0131 ile ilgilidir.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131lama Yasalar\u0131n\u0131n zaman bak\u0131m\u0131ndan uygulanmas\u0131nda genel ilke, yasa de\u011fi\u015fikliklerindeki ge\u00e7ici d\u00fczenlemelerde aksi belirtilmi\u015f olmad\u0131k\u00e7a, derhal uygulama “hemen uygulama” ilkesidir, bu ilke uyar\u0131nca usul i\u015flemleri, yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 s\u0131rada y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan yarg\u0131lama yasas\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine t\u00e2bi olacakt\u0131r. O halde, ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda, yasada de\u011fi\u015fiklik oldu\u011funda yeni yasa hemen uygulanmal\u0131d\u0131r. Ancak, bu durum, \u00f6nceki yasan\u0131n y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulundu\u011fu d\u00f6nemde, o yasaya uygun bi\u00e7imde yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f i\u015flemlerin ge\u00e7ersizli\u011fi sonucunu do\u011furmayaca\u011f\u0131 gibi yenilenmesini de gerektirmez.<\/p>\n
Bu ilkenin sonucu olarak;<\/p>\n
a- Usul i\u015flemleri mutlaka y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckteki yasaya g\u00f6re yap\u0131lacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n
b-Y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckteki yasaya g\u00f6re yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f i\u015flemler, sonradan y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren yasa nedeniyle ge\u00e7erlili\u011fini yitirmeyecektir.<\/p>\n
c- Yeni yasan\u0131n y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden sonra yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken usul i\u015flemleri yeni yasaya t\u00e2bi olacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n
d- Yeni yasan\u0131n uygulanmas\u0131nda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n leh veya aleyhinde sonu\u00e7 do\u011furmas\u0131na bak\u0131lmayacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Somut olayda, su\u00e7 tarihinde 15-18 ya\u015f grubu i\u00e7inde olan san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda, g\u00f6revli mahkemece yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131larak ilk kez 28.2.2001 tarihinde, bozma \u00fczerine de 27.1.2003 tarihinde direnme h\u00fckm\u00fc kurularak uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckteki yarg\u0131lama yasas\u0131na uygun olarak \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f, ancak temyiz a\u015famas\u0131nda 30.7.2003 tarihinde 2253 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 6. maddesinde yap\u0131lan de\u011fi\u015fiklik ile g\u00f6revli mahkeme de\u011fi\u015ftirilmi\u015ftir. Karar\u0131 veren mahkeme, karar tarihinde g\u00f6revli bulundu\u011fundan bu y\u00f6n\u00fcyle yarg\u0131lama yasas\u0131na herhangi bir ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k bulunmamaktad\u0131r, verildi\u011fi zamanda y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan yarg\u0131lama yasas\u0131na uygun olan h\u00fckm\u00fcn bu nedenle bozulmas\u0131 olana\u011f\u0131 bulunmay\u0131p, ancak ba\u015fka bozma nedenlerinin bulunmas\u0131 halinde, \u00f6nceki h\u00fck\u00fcm ortadan kalkaca\u011f\u0131ndan ve mahkemenin g\u00f6revi sona erece\u011finden h\u00fckm\u00fcn g\u00f6rev nedeniyle de bozulmas\u0131na karar verilmelidir.<\/p>\n
Bu nedenle uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k konusu incelenmeli, ba\u015fka bozma nedeni veya nedenleri bulundu\u011fu taktirde h\u00fck\u00fcm bu nedenlere ek olarak g\u00f6revsizlik karar\u0131 verilmesi gerekti\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcyle de bozulmal\u0131, ba\u015fka bir bozma nedeni bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 halde ise onanmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Su\u00e7 vasf\u0131na ili\u015fkin as\u0131l uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k konusuna gelince;<\/p>\n
Ayr\u0131nt\u0131lar\u0131 Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulunun 31.3.1986 g\u00fcn ve 8\/153, 21.5.1984 g\u00fcn ve 388\/178, 22.5.2001 g\u00fcn ve 100\/108 say\u0131 kararlar\u0131nda da vurguland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere kast, sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 bilerek ve isteyerek fiili i\u015fleme iradesidir. Adam \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7unun kast\u0131n\u0131 belirleme di\u011fer bir anlat\u0131mla bu su\u00e7u yaralama su\u00e7unun kast \u00f6\u011fesinden ay\u0131rma hususunda ise \u00f6\u011freti ve uygulamada; su\u00e7 nedeni, kullan\u0131lan vas\u0131tan\u0131n cinsi, kullan\u0131l\u0131\u015f \u015fekli, isabet al\u0131nan b\u00f6lge, darbe adedi ve \u015fiddeti, failin su\u00e7tan \u00f6nceki ve sonraki davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131, aradaki husumet gibi \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fctlere ba\u015fvuruldu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Bu bak\u0131mdan somut olayda uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n sa\u011fl\u0131kl\u0131 bir bi\u00e7imde \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fclebilmesi i\u00e7in olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc \u00f6zellikleri yukarda de\u011finilen \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fctler nazara al\u0131narak de\u011ferlendirilmelidir.<\/p>\n
Ayn\u0131 mahallede oturan san\u0131k Fatih ile ma\u011fdur Zafer’in aralar\u0131nda bulundu\u011fu gruplar\u0131n birbirlerine \u00fcst\u00fcnl\u00fck sa\u011flamak istemeleri nedeniyle zaman zaman tart\u0131\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131, olay g\u00fcn\u00fc de ayn\u0131 nedenlerle ba\u015flayan tart\u0131\u015fman\u0131n kavgaya d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015fmesi \u00fczerine ma\u011fdur Zafer’in yan\u0131nda bulunan ki\u015filerin, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00fczerine \u00e7ullan\u0131p, san\u0131\u011f\u0131 tartaklamaya ba\u015flad\u0131klar\u0131, ma\u011fdur ve yan\u0131ndakilerin san\u0131\u011fa sald\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6ren san\u0131\u011f\u0131n annesi Ne\u015fe’nin, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00fczerine sar\u0131larak o\u011flunun d\u00f6v\u00fclmesine engel olmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu s\u0131rada olay\u0131 camdan g\u00f6ren tan\u0131k D\u00f6nd\u00fc’n\u00fcn de a\u015fa\u011f\u0131ya inip kavgay\u0131 ay\u0131rmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, sald\u0131rganlar\u0131n tan\u0131k D\u00f6nd\u00fc ve san\u0131\u011f\u0131n annesi Ne\u015fe’ye de sald\u0131r\u0131p, tartaklamak istemeleri \u00fczerine, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00fczerinde ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 ruhsats\u0131z, 7.65 mm \u00e7apl\u0131 brovning tipi fi\u015fek atar el yap\u0131m\u0131 tabancas\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7ekerek, tan\u0131klar \u00d6mer Faruk Parlak ve Adem Tosun’un kolluk anlat\u0131mlar\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirttikleri \u00fczere, 2-3 metre mesafeden ma\u011fdur Zafer’i hedef alarak 3 el ate\u015f ate\u015f etti\u011fi, ate\u015f sonucu yaralanan ma\u011fdurun hemen saat 20.20’de \u00c7aml\u0131ca hastanesi acil poliklini\u011fine g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, yak\u0131nlar\u0131n\u0131n iste\u011fi \u00fczerine de buradan Haydarpa\u015fa acil cerrahi klini\u011fine sevk edildi\u011fi, hakk\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen t\u0131bbi belgeler ve raporlara g\u00f6re sol koldan giren kur\u015funun sol humerus k\u0131r\u0131\u011f\u0131na neden oldu\u011fu, ayn\u0131 kur\u015funun g\u00f6\u011f\u00fcs sol yandan girerek klavikula (k\u00f6pr\u00fcc\u00fck) kemi\u011fi alt\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131, her iki yaralanma nedeniyle ma\u011fdurun hayati tehlikeye maruz kalmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve mevcut yaralanman\u0131n 60 g\u00fcn mutad i\u015ftigaline engel te\u015fkil edece\u011fi, anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Her ne kadar, san\u0131k ve ma\u011fdur taraf\u0131n daha sonra anla\u015fmalar\u0131 nedeniyle, ma\u011fdur, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ba\u015fkalar\u0131 ile tart\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 oradan ge\u00e7erken merminin kendisine isabet etti\u011fini s\u00f6ylemi\u015f, tan\u0131klar da duru\u015fmada ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde beyanlarda bulunmu\u015flar ise de, maddi kan\u0131tlarla ve olaydan hemen sonra saptanan ma\u011fdur ve tan\u0131k anlat\u0131mlar\u0131 ile san\u0131k savunmalar\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 olan bu beyanlara itibar etmek olana\u011f\u0131 bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Bu a\u00e7\u0131klamalar \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, ba\u011fl\u0131 olduklar\u0131 gruplar\u0131n birbirlerine \u00fcst\u00fcnl\u00fck sa\u011flamak istemeleri nedeniyle aralar\u0131nda husumet bulunan san\u0131k ve ma\u011fdurun olay g\u00fcn\u00fc de bu nedenle tart\u0131\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131, tart\u0131\u015fman\u0131n kavgaya d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015fmesi \u00fczerine, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ruhsats\u0131z tabancas\u0131n\u0131, ate\u015fli silah\u0131n mutlak \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc mesafesi i\u00e7inde bulunan 2-3 metreden ma\u011fdurun hayati tehlike do\u011furacak b\u00f6lgelerini hedef almak suretiyle yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 at\u0131\u015flarla onu hayati tehlike do\u011furmayacak ancak 60 g\u00fcn i\u015f ve g\u00fc\u00e7ten kalacak \u015fekilde yaralamas\u0131nda, \u00f6ld\u00fcrme kast\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilmelidir.<\/p>\n
Bu itibarla icra hareketlerini bitiren ancak istedi\u011fi \u00f6ld\u00fcrme sonucunu ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftiremeyen san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eylemi \u00f6ld\u00fcrmeye tam kalk\u0131\u015fma su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011fundan, yerel mahkeme direnme h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn su\u00e7 vasf\u0131ndaki yan\u0131lg\u0131 ve mahkemenin g\u00f6revsizli\u011fi nedenleriyle bozulmas\u0131na karar verilmelidir.<\/p>\n
\u00c7o\u011funluk g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kat\u0131lmayan bir k\u0131s\u0131m Kurul \u00dcyeleri; Yerel Mahkeme direnme h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn hakl\u0131 nedenlere dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcyle h\u00fckm\u00fcn onanmas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde oy kullanm\u0131\u015flard\u0131r.<\/p>\n
SONU\u00c7 : A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle, Yerel Mahkeme direnme h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn su\u00e7 vasf\u0131ndaki yan\u0131lg\u0131 ve mahkemenin g\u00f6revsizli\u011fi nedenleriyle BOZULMASINA, dosyan\u0131n mahalline g\u00f6nderilmek \u00fczere Yarg\u0131tay C.Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na tevdiine, 30.9.2003 g\u00fcn\u00fc tebli\u011fnamedeki isteme uygun olarak oy\u00e7oklu\u011fu ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bYarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulu\u2019nun 08.07.2008 tarihli, 2008\/88 E., 2008\/184 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile 30.9.2003 tarihli, 2003\/1-226 E., 2003\/229 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T.C. Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulu 2008\/88 E., 2008\/184 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” Karar\u0131 veren Yarg\u0131tay Dairesi : 1. Ceza Dairesi Mahkemesi :A\u011f\u0131r Ceza G\u00fcn\u00fc : 24.09.2007 Say\u0131s\u0131 : 296-374 San\u0131k …\u2019\u0131n insan \u00f6ld\u00fcrmeye kalk\u0131\u015fma su\u00e7undan dolay\u0131 uygulamada daha lehe sonu\u00e7 verdi\u011fi belirtilerek 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCY\u2019n\u0131n 81, 35\/2, 29 ve 62 maddeleri uyar\u0131nca 1 y\u0131l 10 ay 15 g\u00fcn hapis cezas\u0131yla cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ve hak yoksunlu\u011funa ili\u015fkin \u0130zmir 3. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinden verilen 01.02.2006 g\u00fcn ve 107-17 say\u0131l\u0131 h\u00fckm\u00fcn san\u0131k m\u00fcdafilerince temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine dosyay\u0131 inceleyen Yarg\u0131tay 1. Ceza Dairesince 03.07.2007 g\u00fcn ve 7543-5426 say\u0131 ile; \u201cSan\u0131\u011f\u0131n, geceleyin, kavga ortam\u0131nda, ma\u011fduru b\u0131\u00e7akla, i\u00e7 organ yaralanmas\u0131na neden olmayacak \u015fekilde bir kez yaralad\u0131\u011f\u0131 olayda, hayati b\u00f6lgelerin hedef se\u00e7ildi\u011fine, eyle\u00acmin engel nedeniyle s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclemedi\u011fine dair delil bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 halde, yaralama su\u00e7u yerine \u00f6ld\u00fcrmeye te\u015febb\u00fcsten yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde karar verilmesi\u201d isabetsizli\u011finden bozulmu\u015ftur. Yerel Mahkeme 24.09.2007 g\u00fcn ve 296-374 say\u0131 ile; b\u0131\u00e7a\u011f\u0131n hayati b\u00f6lgeye isabet etmesi kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kast\u0131n\u0131n insan \u00f6ld\u00fcrmeye y\u00f6nelik oldu\u011funun a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131\u011fa kavu\u015ftu\u011funu belirterek \u00f6nceki h\u00fck\u00fcmde direnmi\u015ftir. Bu h\u00fckm\u00fcn de san\u0131k m\u00fcdafii ile Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine dosya Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n \u201ch\u00fckm\u00fcn bozulmas\u0131\u201d g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc i\u00e7eren 26.03.2008 g\u00fcnl\u00fc tebli\u011fnamesiyle Yarg\u0131tay Birinci Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6nderilmekle, Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulun\u2019da de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015f ve a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki gerek\u00e7elerle karara ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. T\u00dcRK M\u0130LLET\u0130 ADINA CEZA …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-150737","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n