{"id":148702,"date":"2025-07-17T11:20:00","date_gmt":"2025-07-17T08:20:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uncategorized-tr\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2010-19635-e-2011-9192-k-sayili-karari\/"},"modified":"2025-07-17T11:20:00","modified_gmt":"2025-07-17T08:20:00","slug":"yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2010-19635-e-2011-9192-k-sayili-karari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2010-19635-e-2011-9192-k-sayili-karari\/","title":{"rendered":"Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi’nin 2010\/19635 E., 2011\/9192 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"

T.C.<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay<\/p>\n

2. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n

2010\/19635 E., 2011\/9192 K.<\/p>\n

“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n

MAHKEMES\u0130 :\u0130zmir 12. Aile Mahkemesi
\nTAR\u0130H\u0130 :21.07.2010
\nNUMARASI :Esas no:2010\/518 Karar no:2010\/661<\/p>\n

Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki davan\u0131n yap\u0131lan muhakemesi sonunda mahalli mahkemece verilen ve yukar\u0131da tarih numaras\u0131 g\u00f6sterilen h\u00fck\u00fcm temyiz edilmekle evrak okunup gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc.
\nDava konusu ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n \u201caile konutu\u201d oldu\u011fu hususunda taraflar aras\u0131nda bir uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k yoktur. E\u015flerden biri di\u011fer e\u015fin a\u00e7\u0131k r\u0131zas\u0131 bulunmad\u0131k\u00e7a, aile konutunu devredemez veya aile konutu \u00fczerindeki haklar\u0131 s\u0131n\u0131rlayamaz.(TMK.md.194\/1) Konut \u00fczerinde hak sahibi olan daval\u0131 kocan\u0131n e\u015finin a\u00e7\u0131k r\u0131zas\u0131n\u0131 almadan orta\u011f\u0131 oldu\u011fu dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 \u015firketin kredi borcunun teminat\u0131 olmak \u00fczere, konut \u00fczerinde di\u011fer daval\u0131 banka lehine 25.08.2005 tarihinde ipotek tesis etti\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. \u0130potek tesisine ili\u015fkin i\u015flemden \u00f6nce ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n tapu k\u00fct\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde \u201caile konutu\u201d oldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin bir \u015ferh bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Bu durumda daval\u0131 bankan\u0131n ipote\u011fe ili\u015fkin kazan\u0131m\u0131, iyiniyetli ise korunur.(TMK. md. 1023) Kanunun iyiniyete hukuki sonu\u00e7 ba\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 durumlarda, as\u0131l olan iyiniyetin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131d\u0131r. Ancak, durumun gereklerine g\u00f6re kendisinden beklenen \u00f6zeni g\u00f6stermeyen kimse iyiniyet iddias\u0131nda bulunamaz. (TMK. md. 3) Lehine ipotek tesis edilen daval\u0131 banka tacirdir. Her tacirin, ticaretine ait b\u00fct\u00fcn faaliyetlerinde basiretli bir i\u015f adam\u0131 gibi hareket etmesi laz\u0131md\u0131r. (TTK. md. 20\/2) Basiretli hareket etme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, teminat olarak g\u00f6sterilen ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n hukuki ve fiili durumunu ve kullanma \u015feklini bilmeyi de gerektirir. Bu y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn gerektirdi\u011fi \u00f6zeni g\u00f6stermeyen bankan\u0131n iyiniyet iddias\u0131 dinlenmez. \u00d6yleyse daval\u0131 bankan\u0131n T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanununun 1023. maddesinin sa\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 korumadan yararlanmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. Bu a\u00e7\u0131klamalara g\u00f6re davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi gerekirken iste\u011fin reddi do\u011fru bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. SONU\u00c7: Temyiz edilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn yukar\u0131da g\u00f6sterilen sebeple BOZULMASINA, temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131n\u0131n yat\u0131rana geri verilmesine, i\u015f bu karar\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren 15 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde karar d\u00fczeltme yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere gerek\u00e7e y\u00f6n\u00fcnden oy\u00e7oklu\u011fuyla bozma sonucu y\u00f6n\u00fcnden oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi. 26.05.2011 per.<\/p>\n

KAR\u015eI OY
\nDi\u011fer e\u015fin \u201ca\u00e7\u0131k r\u0131zas\u0131\u201d n\u0131n mevcut veya karinelerle var say\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirdi\u011fini ispat y\u00fck\u00fc daval\u0131 banka \u00fczerindedir. Daval\u0131 banka bu ispat y\u00fck\u00fc gere\u011fince davac\u0131 e\u015fin a\u00e7\u0131k r\u0131zas\u0131n\u0131n mevcut veya mevcut say\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini usul\u00fcnce kan\u0131tlayamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Davan\u0131n bu nedenle kabul\u00fcne karar verilmelidir. H\u00fckm\u00fcn de\u011fi\u015fik bu gerek\u00e7eyle bozulmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcyorum.<\/p>\n

\u200bYarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi’nin 26.05.2011 tarihli, 2010\/19635 E., 2011\/9192 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n

Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi 2010\/19635 E., 2011\/9192 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” MAHKEMES\u0130 :\u0130zmir 12. Aile Mahkemesi TAR\u0130H\u0130 :21.07.2010 NUMARASI :Esas no:2010\/518 Karar no:2010\/661 Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki davan\u0131n yap\u0131lan muhakemesi sonunda mahalli mahkemece verilen ve yukar\u0131da tarih numaras\u0131 g\u00f6sterilen h\u00fck\u00fcm temyiz edilmekle evrak okunup gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc. Dava konusu ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n \u201caile konutu\u201d oldu\u011fu hususunda taraflar aras\u0131nda bir uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k yoktur. E\u015flerden biri di\u011fer e\u015fin a\u00e7\u0131k r\u0131zas\u0131 bulunmad\u0131k\u00e7a, aile konutunu devredemez veya aile konutu \u00fczerindeki haklar\u0131 s\u0131n\u0131rlayamaz.(TMK.md.194\/1) Konut \u00fczerinde hak sahibi olan daval\u0131 kocan\u0131n e\u015finin a\u00e7\u0131k r\u0131zas\u0131n\u0131 almadan orta\u011f\u0131 oldu\u011fu dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 \u015firketin kredi borcunun teminat\u0131 olmak \u00fczere, konut \u00fczerinde di\u011fer daval\u0131 banka lehine 25.08.2005 tarihinde ipotek tesis etti\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. \u0130potek tesisine ili\u015fkin i\u015flemden \u00f6nce ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n tapu k\u00fct\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde \u201caile konutu\u201d oldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin bir \u015ferh bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Bu durumda daval\u0131 bankan\u0131n ipote\u011fe ili\u015fkin kazan\u0131m\u0131, iyiniyetli ise korunur.(TMK. md. 1023) Kanunun iyiniyete hukuki sonu\u00e7 ba\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 durumlarda, as\u0131l olan iyiniyetin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131d\u0131r. Ancak, durumun gereklerine g\u00f6re kendisinden beklenen \u00f6zeni g\u00f6stermeyen kimse iyiniyet iddias\u0131nda bulunamaz. (TMK. md. 3) Lehine ipotek tesis edilen daval\u0131 banka tacirdir. Her tacirin, ticaretine ait b\u00fct\u00fcn faaliyetlerinde basiretli bir i\u015f adam\u0131 gibi hareket etmesi laz\u0131md\u0131r. (TTK. md. 20\/2) Basiretli hareket etme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, teminat olarak g\u00f6sterilen ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n hukuki ve fiili durumunu ve kullanma \u015feklini bilmeyi de gerektirir. …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-148702","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nYarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2010\/19635 E., 2011\/9192 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2010-19635-e-2011-9192-k-sayili-karari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"de_DE\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2010\/19635 E., 2011\/9192 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi 2010\/19635 E., 2011\/9192 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” MAHKEMES\u0130 :\u0130zmir 12. Aile Mahkemesi TAR\u0130H\u0130 :21.07.2010 NUMARASI :Esas no:2010\/518 Karar no:2010\/661 Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki davan\u0131n yap\u0131lan muhakemesi sonunda mahalli mahkemece verilen ve yukar\u0131da tarih numaras\u0131 g\u00f6sterilen h\u00fck\u00fcm temyiz edilmekle evrak okunup gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc. Dava konusu ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n \u201caile konutu\u201d oldu\u011fu hususunda taraflar aras\u0131nda bir uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k yoktur. E\u015flerden biri di\u011fer e\u015fin a\u00e7\u0131k r\u0131zas\u0131 bulunmad\u0131k\u00e7a, aile konutunu devredemez veya aile konutu \u00fczerindeki haklar\u0131 s\u0131n\u0131rlayamaz.(TMK.md.194\/1) Konut \u00fczerinde hak sahibi olan daval\u0131 kocan\u0131n e\u015finin a\u00e7\u0131k r\u0131zas\u0131n\u0131 almadan orta\u011f\u0131 oldu\u011fu dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 \u015firketin kredi borcunun teminat\u0131 olmak \u00fczere, konut \u00fczerinde di\u011fer daval\u0131 banka lehine 25.08.2005 tarihinde ipotek tesis etti\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. \u0130potek tesisine ili\u015fkin i\u015flemden \u00f6nce ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n tapu k\u00fct\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde \u201caile konutu\u201d oldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin bir \u015ferh bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Bu durumda daval\u0131 bankan\u0131n ipote\u011fe ili\u015fkin kazan\u0131m\u0131, iyiniyetli ise korunur.(TMK. md. 1023) Kanunun iyiniyete hukuki sonu\u00e7 ba\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 durumlarda, as\u0131l olan iyiniyetin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131d\u0131r. Ancak, durumun gereklerine g\u00f6re kendisinden beklenen \u00f6zeni g\u00f6stermeyen kimse iyiniyet iddias\u0131nda bulunamaz. (TMK. md. 3) Lehine ipotek tesis edilen daval\u0131 banka tacirdir. Her tacirin, ticaretine ait b\u00fct\u00fcn faaliyetlerinde basiretli bir i\u015f adam\u0131 gibi hareket etmesi laz\u0131md\u0131r. (TTK. md. 20\/2) Basiretli hareket etme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, teminat olarak g\u00f6sterilen ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n hukuki ve fiili durumunu ve kullanma \u015feklini bilmeyi de gerektirir. …\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2010-19635-e-2011-9192-k-sayili-karari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-07-17T08:20:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Verfasst von\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Gesch\u00e4tzte Lesezeit\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2\u00a0Minuten\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2010-19635-e-2011-9192-k-sayili-karari\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2010-19635-e-2011-9192-k-sayili-karari\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\"},\"headline\":\"Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi’nin 2010\/19635 E., 2011\/9192 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-07-17T08:20:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2010-19635-e-2011-9192-k-sayili-karari\/\"},\"wordCount\":491,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Hukuki Haberler\"],\"inLanguage\":\"de\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2010-19635-e-2011-9192-k-sayili-karari\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2010-19635-e-2011-9192-k-sayili-karari\/\",\"name\":\"Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2010\/19635 E., 2011\/9192 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2025-07-17T08:20:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2010-19635-e-2011-9192-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"de\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2010-19635-e-2011-9192-k-sayili-karari\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2010-19635-e-2011-9192-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi’nin 2010\/19635 E., 2011\/9192 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"description\":\"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"de\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"de\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"width\":1080,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\",\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"de\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/author\/hukukihabernet\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2010\/19635 E., 2011\/9192 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2010-19635-e-2011-9192-k-sayili-karari\/","og_locale":"de_DE","og_type":"article","og_title":"Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2010\/19635 E., 2011\/9192 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131","og_description":"T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi 2010\/19635 E., 2011\/9192 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” MAHKEMES\u0130 :\u0130zmir 12. Aile Mahkemesi TAR\u0130H\u0130 :21.07.2010 NUMARASI :Esas no:2010\/518 Karar no:2010\/661 Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki davan\u0131n yap\u0131lan muhakemesi sonunda mahalli mahkemece verilen ve yukar\u0131da tarih numaras\u0131 g\u00f6sterilen h\u00fck\u00fcm temyiz edilmekle evrak okunup gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc. Dava konusu ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n \u201caile konutu\u201d oldu\u011fu hususunda taraflar aras\u0131nda bir uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k yoktur. E\u015flerden biri di\u011fer e\u015fin a\u00e7\u0131k r\u0131zas\u0131 bulunmad\u0131k\u00e7a, aile konutunu devredemez veya aile konutu \u00fczerindeki haklar\u0131 s\u0131n\u0131rlayamaz.(TMK.md.194\/1) Konut \u00fczerinde hak sahibi olan daval\u0131 kocan\u0131n e\u015finin a\u00e7\u0131k r\u0131zas\u0131n\u0131 almadan orta\u011f\u0131 oldu\u011fu dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 \u015firketin kredi borcunun teminat\u0131 olmak \u00fczere, konut \u00fczerinde di\u011fer daval\u0131 banka lehine 25.08.2005 tarihinde ipotek tesis etti\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. \u0130potek tesisine ili\u015fkin i\u015flemden \u00f6nce ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n tapu k\u00fct\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde \u201caile konutu\u201d oldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin bir \u015ferh bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Bu durumda daval\u0131 bankan\u0131n ipote\u011fe ili\u015fkin kazan\u0131m\u0131, iyiniyetli ise korunur.(TMK. md. 1023) Kanunun iyiniyete hukuki sonu\u00e7 ba\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 durumlarda, as\u0131l olan iyiniyetin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131d\u0131r. Ancak, durumun gereklerine g\u00f6re kendisinden beklenen \u00f6zeni g\u00f6stermeyen kimse iyiniyet iddias\u0131nda bulunamaz. (TMK. md. 3) Lehine ipotek tesis edilen daval\u0131 banka tacirdir. Her tacirin, ticaretine ait b\u00fct\u00fcn faaliyetlerinde basiretli bir i\u015f adam\u0131 gibi hareket etmesi laz\u0131md\u0131r. (TTK. md. 20\/2) Basiretli hareket etme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, teminat olarak g\u00f6sterilen ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n hukuki ve fiili durumunu ve kullanma \u015feklini bilmeyi de gerektirir. …","og_url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2010-19635-e-2011-9192-k-sayili-karari\/","og_site_name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","article_published_time":"2025-07-17T08:20:00+00:00","author":"Hukuki Haber.net","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Verfasst von":"Hukuki Haber.net","Gesch\u00e4tzte Lesezeit":"2\u00a0Minuten"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2010-19635-e-2011-9192-k-sayili-karari\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2010-19635-e-2011-9192-k-sayili-karari\/"},"author":{"name":"Hukuki Haber.net","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822"},"headline":"Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi’nin 2010\/19635 E., 2011\/9192 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131","datePublished":"2025-07-17T08:20:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2010-19635-e-2011-9192-k-sayili-karari\/"},"wordCount":491,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Hukuki Haberler"],"inLanguage":"de"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2010-19635-e-2011-9192-k-sayili-karari\/","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2010-19635-e-2011-9192-k-sayili-karari\/","name":"Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2010\/19635 E., 2011\/9192 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-07-17T08:20:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2010-19635-e-2011-9192-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"de","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2010-19635-e-2011-9192-k-sayili-karari\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2010-19635-e-2011-9192-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi’nin 2010\/19635 E., 2011\/9192 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","description":"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"de"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"de","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","width":1080,"height":1080,"caption":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822","name":"Hukuki Haber.net","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"de","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Hukuki Haber.net"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net"],"url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/author\/hukukihabernet\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/148702","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=148702"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/148702\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=148702"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=148702"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=148702"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}