T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
HAYRETT\u0130N D\u00d6NMEZ BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/28287)<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 27\/5\/2025<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n
Selahaddin MENTE\u015e<\/p>\n
\u0130rfan F\u0130DAN<\/p>\n
Muhterem \u0130NCE<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Abdurrahman Remzi AKPINAR<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hayrettin D\u00d6NMEZ<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, kamu g\u00f6revinden \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lman\u0131n ard\u0131ndan tesis edilen baro staj listesine yaz\u0131lma i\u015fleminin yarg\u0131 karar\u0131 ile iptal edilmesi nedeniyle \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Emniyet m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc olarak g\u00f6rev yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u0131rada ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc h\u00e2l kanun h\u00fckm\u00fcnde kararnamelerine (OHAL KHK’lar\u0131) dayan\u0131larak kamu g\u00f6revinden \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan ba\u015fvurucu, baro staj listesine avukat stajyeri olarak yaz\u0131lma talebiyle Ankara Barosuna (Baro) ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur. Baro Y\u00f6netim Kurulu; ba\u015fvurucunun OHAL KHK’s\u0131 ile g\u00f6revinden \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kamu g\u00f6revlisi olma niteli\u011fini kaybetti\u011fini, hakk\u0131nda devam eden kovu\u015fturma oldu\u011funu ifade ederek talebi reddetmi\u015ftir. Bu karara yap\u0131lan itiraz\u0131 T\u00fcrkiye Barolar Birli\u011fi (TBB) Y\u00f6netim Kurulu, avukatl\u0131\u011f\u0131n kamu g\u00f6revi olmamas\u0131 ve istihdam olarak nitelendirilemeyece\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle kabul ederek ba\u015fvurucunun staj listesine yaz\u0131lmas\u0131 konusunda dosyan\u0131n Baroya g\u00f6nderilmesine karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
3. S\u00f6z konusu karar, Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) taraf\u0131ndan uygun bulunmayarak bir daha g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fclmek \u00fczere TBB’ye geri g\u00f6nderilmi\u015ftir. TBB, \u00f6nceki karar\u0131nda \u0131srar ederek ba\u015fvurucunun baro staj listesine yaz\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. Bakanl\u0131k, an\u0131lan karara kar\u015f\u0131 Ankara 5. \u0130dare Mahkemesinde (Mahkeme) y\u00fcr\u00fctmeyi durdurma talepli iptal davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu, daval\u0131 TBB’nin yan\u0131nda iptal davas\u0131nda m\u00fcdahil olarak yer alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
4. Mahkeme \u00f6ncelikle y\u00fcr\u00fctmenin durdurulmas\u0131 talebini kabul etmi\u015f, sonras\u0131nda ise 17\/12\/2020 tarihinde davan\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile idari i\u015flemin iptaline karar vermi\u015ftir. Karar gerek\u00e7esinde; ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan a\u00e7\u0131lan ceza davas\u0131n\u0131n derdest oldu\u011fu, ba\u015fvurucuya isnat edilen fiilin niteli\u011fi ile baro levhas\u0131na yaz\u0131lmas\u0131 durumunda y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclecek kamu hizmetinin \u00f6nemi ve \u00f6zelli\u011fi vurgulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. An\u0131lan hususlar ile 19\/3\/1969 tarihli ve 1136 say\u0131l\u0131 Avukatl\u0131k Kanunu’nun ilgili d\u00fczenlemeleri dikkate al\u0131narak staj listesine yaz\u0131lma karar\u0131 i\u00e7in kovu\u015fturma sonucunun beklenmesinin yerinde olaca\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
5. S\u00f6z konusu karara kar\u015f\u0131 TBB istinaf kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur. \u0130stinaf talebi Ankara B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesi 12. \u0130dari Dava Dairesinin 22\/4\/2021 tarihli karar\u0131 ile kesin olarak reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. Ba\u015fvuru 28\/6\/2021tarihinde yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
7. Ba\u015fvurucu; avukatl\u0131k staj\u0131 listesine yaz\u0131lma talebinin mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan reddedilmesi nedeniyle \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma hakk\u0131, e\u011fitim hakk\u0131 ve masumiyet karinesinin ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde, Anayasa ve ilgili mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmleri, Anayasa Mahkemesi i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131 ve somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
8. Ba\u015fvurucunun iddias\u0131n\u0131n avukatl\u0131k staj\u0131 listesine yaz\u0131lma talebinin reddedilmesine, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla serbest avukatl\u0131k yapmas\u0131n\u0131n engellenmesine ili\u015fkin oldu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Mesleki hayata y\u00f6nelik bu t\u00fcr tedbirlerin ya da m\u00fcdahalelerin hangi durumlarda \u00f6zel hayat ba\u011flam\u0131nda uygulanabilir oldu\u011fu hususunda belirlenen \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fctler Tamer Mahmuto\u011flu ([GK], B. No: 2017\/38953, 23\/7\/2020, \u00a7\u00a7 84-96) karar\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu do\u011frultuda ba\u015fvurucunun iddialar\u0131 bir b\u00fct\u00fcn h\u00e2linde \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
9. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir (ayn\u0131 y\u00f6ndeki de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7in bkz. Mehmet \u00c7etinkaya ve D.K. [GK], B. No: 2018\/27392, 15\/4\/2021; B.A.Y. [GK], B. No: 2019\/19788, 5\/7\/2022). Ba\u015fvurucunun staj listesine yaz\u0131lma talebinin reddinin \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131na m\u00fcdahale niteli\u011finde oldu\u011fu ve an\u0131lan m\u00fcdahalenin Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 13. maddesinde belirtilen ko\u015fullara uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 20. maddesini ihlal edece\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r (\u00d6mer \u00d6zcan [GK], B. No: 2019\/24047, 23\/3\/2023).<\/p>\n
10. Anayasa Mahkemesi, \u00d6mer \u00d6zcan karar\u0131nda an\u0131lan m\u00fcdahalenin me\u015fru amac\u0131n\u0131n oldu\u011funu tespit ederek kanuni dayana\u011f\u0131n\u0131 demokratik toplum d\u00fczeninin gereklerine uygunluk ve \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fcl\u00fck kriteriyle birlikte incelemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
11. Bu kapsamda Anayasa Mahkemesi, 1136 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 5. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda baz\u0131 su\u00e7lardan kovu\u015fturma alt\u0131nda bulunulmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde avukatl\u0131\u011fa al\u0131nma iste\u011fi hakk\u0131ndaki karar\u0131n kovu\u015fturma sonuna kadar ertelenebilece\u011fini ancak ilgili mevzuatta staj\u0131n \u00f6telenmesine dair a\u00e7\u0131k bir kanuni d\u00fczenlemenin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 tespit etmi\u015ftir. Buradan hareketle staj\u0131n avukatl\u0131\u011fa kabul talebinde bulunman\u0131n \u00f6n \u015fart\u0131 olarak d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda bu kural\u0131n staja ba\u015fvuruda i\u015flerlik kazand\u0131r\u0131lacak \u015fekilde geni\u015f yorumlanmas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclebilir olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fckleri daraltan bir yorum oldu\u011fu de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir (\u00d6mer \u00d6zcan, \u00a7\u00a7 61, 63).<\/p>\n
12. Bununla birlikte an\u0131lan kararda kovu\u015fturman\u0131n mahk\u00fbmiyetle sonu\u00e7lanmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde aday\u0131n staj listesinden ve avukat\u0131n baro levhas\u0131ndan kesin olarak silinece\u011finin mevzuatta d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi ifade edilmi\u015ftir. Bu a\u00e7\u0131klamalar ba\u011flam\u0131nda hakk\u0131nda devam eden kovu\u015fturma bulunmas\u0131 sebebiyle ba\u015fvurucunun baro staj listesine yaz\u0131lmamas\u0131n\u0131n hangi zorlay\u0131c\u0131 toplumsal ihtiyac\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ilgili ve yeterli bir gerek\u00e7e ile ortaya konulamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (\u00d6mer \u00d6zcan, \u00a7\u00a7 64, 65). Somut ba\u015fvuruda da an\u0131lan ilke ve tespitlerden ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren bir durum olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 20. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
Muhterem \u0130NCE bu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fe kat\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M <\/p>\n
13. Ba\u015fvurucu, ihlalin tespiti ve yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131 talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
14. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamda karar\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi yarg\u0131 mercilerince yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden yarg\u0131lama i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flatmak ve Anayasa Mahkemesini ihlal sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131ran nedenleri gideren, ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere uygun yeni bir karar vermektir (Mehmet Do\u011fan [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2) [1. B.], B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. \u00d6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE,<\/p>\n
B. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 20. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE Muhterem \u0130NCE’nin kar\u015f\u0131oyu ve OY\u00c7OKLU\u011eUYLA,<\/p>\n
C. Karar\u0131n birer \u00f6rne\u011finin \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere Ankara 5. \u0130dare Mahkemesi (E.2019\/2302, K.2020\/2036) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. 487,60 TL har\u00e7tan olu\u015fan yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvurucuya \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. \u00d6demenin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
F. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 27\/5\/2025 tarihinde karar verildi.<\/p>\n
KAR\u015eIOY GEREK\u00c7ES\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvurucu, avukatl\u0131k staj\u0131 listesine yaz\u0131lma talebinin mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan reddedilmesi nedeniyle \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma hakk\u0131, e\u011fitim hakk\u0131 ve masumiyet karinesinin ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Mahkememiz \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011fu, hakk\u0131nda devam eden kovu\u015fturma bulunmas\u0131 sebebiyle ba\u015fvurucunun baro staj listesine yaz\u0131lmamas\u0131n\u0131n hangi zorlay\u0131c\u0131 toplumsal ihtiyac\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ilgili ve yeterli bir gerek\u00e7eyle ortaya konulamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucunun ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olmak su\u00e7lamas\u0131yla hakk\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen kovu\u015fturma nedeniyle avukatl\u0131k staj listesine yaz\u0131lma talebi reddedilmi\u015f, bu i\u015flem aleyhine a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 idari dava da ret ile sonu\u00e7lanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. 1136 say\u0131l\u0131 Avukatl\u0131k Kanunu\u2019nun 5. maddesinde avukatl\u0131\u011fa kabule engel haller say\u0131l\u0131rken, s\u00f6z konusu maddenin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (a) bendinde yer alan su\u00e7lardan mahk\u00fbm olunmas\u0131, kesin bir engel olarak kabul edilmi\u015ftir. Ayn\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 5. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda ise birinci f\u0131kran\u0131n (a) bendinde say\u0131lan su\u00e7lara ili\u015fkin derdest bir kovu\u015fturman\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131, avukat olabilmenin \u00f6n\u00fcnde takdiri ve ge\u00e7ici bir engel olarak d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. Avukatl\u0131k Kanunu\u2019nun avukat stajyeri olabilme \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi 16. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda avukat olmaya engel haller stajyer olmaya da engel olarak kabul edilmi\u015ftir. Bu d\u00fczenlemeler \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde 1136 say\u0131l\u0131 Avukatl\u0131k Kanunu\u2019nun 5. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (a) bendinde yaz\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7lar nedeniyle hakk\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f bir ceza davas\u0131 bulunan ki\u015finin stajyerler listesine yaz\u0131l\u0131p yaz\u0131lmama konusunda idareye tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015f bir takdir hakk\u0131 bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
4. Somut olayda ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda var olan davay\u0131 dikkate alan idare ise takdir hakk\u0131n\u0131 olumsuz y\u00f6nde kullanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu karar aleyhine a\u00e7\u0131lan davada ise karar mercileri takdir hakk\u0131n\u0131n keyfi olarak kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde bir tespite yer vermeyerek davay\u0131 iptal talebinin reddi karar\u0131 ile sonu\u00e7land\u0131rm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcre\u00e7lerinde iddialar\u0131n\u0131 serbest\u00e7e dile getirmi\u015f, kanun yollar\u0131na m\u00fcracaat hakk\u0131n\u0131 bir k\u0131s\u0131tlamaya tabi olmaks\u0131z\u0131n kullanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
5. Gerek idare ve gerekse yarg\u0131lama mercileri ilgili hakk\u0131ndaki su\u00e7 kovu\u015fturmas\u0131n\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kararlar\u0131na esas gerek\u00e7e olarak kabul etmi\u015flerdir. B\u00f6yle bir soru\u015fturman\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir vak\u0131a olup 1136 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 16. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131, yap\u0131lan i\u015fleme yeterli bir kanuni temel de olu\u015fturmaktad\u0131r. Yap\u0131lan i\u015flem ve verilen kararlarda bariz bir takdir hatas\u0131ndan ve a\u00e7\u0131k bir keyfilikten s\u00f6z etmek de m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. Ayr\u0131ca ba\u015fvurucu, a\u015famalardaki iddia ve savunmalar\u0131nda aksi y\u00f6nde bir veriyi ortaya koymu\u015f de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n
6. A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle, ba\u015fvurucunun Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 20.maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edilmedi\u011fi kanaatini ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131mdan \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011fun aksi y\u00f6ndeki karar\u0131na kat\u0131lm\u0131yorum.<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Muhterem \u0130NCE<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 27\/5\/2025 tarihli ve 2021\/28287 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR HAYRETT\u0130N D\u00d6NMEZ BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/28287) Karar Tarihi: 27\/5\/2025 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ Selahaddin MENTE\u015e \u0130rfan F\u0130DAN Muhterem \u0130NCE Raport\u00f6r : Abdurrahman Remzi AKPINAR Ba\u015fvurucu : Hayrettin D\u00d6NMEZ I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, kamu g\u00f6revinden \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lman\u0131n ard\u0131ndan tesis edilen baro staj listesine yaz\u0131lma i\u015fleminin yarg\u0131 karar\u0131 ile iptal edilmesi nedeniyle \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Emniyet m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc olarak g\u00f6rev yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u0131rada ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc h\u00e2l kanun h\u00fckm\u00fcnde kararnamelerine (OHAL KHK’lar\u0131) dayan\u0131larak kamu g\u00f6revinden \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan ba\u015fvurucu, baro staj listesine avukat stajyeri olarak yaz\u0131lma talebiyle Ankara Barosuna (Baro) ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur. Baro Y\u00f6netim Kurulu; ba\u015fvurucunun OHAL KHK’s\u0131 ile g\u00f6revinden \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kamu g\u00f6revlisi olma niteli\u011fini kaybetti\u011fini, hakk\u0131nda devam eden kovu\u015fturma oldu\u011funu ifade ederek talebi reddetmi\u015ftir. Bu karara yap\u0131lan itiraz\u0131 T\u00fcrkiye Barolar Birli\u011fi (TBB) Y\u00f6netim Kurulu, avukatl\u0131\u011f\u0131n kamu g\u00f6revi olmamas\u0131 ve istihdam olarak nitelendirilemeyece\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle kabul ederek ba\u015fvurucunun staj listesine yaz\u0131lmas\u0131 konusunda dosyan\u0131n Baroya g\u00f6nderilmesine karar vermi\u015ftir. 3. S\u00f6z konusu karar, Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) taraf\u0131ndan uygun bulunmayarak bir daha g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fclmek \u00fczere TBB’ye geri g\u00f6nderilmi\u015ftir. TBB, \u00f6nceki karar\u0131nda \u0131srar ederek ba\u015fvurucunun baro staj listesine yaz\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. Bakanl\u0131k, an\u0131lan karara kar\u015f\u0131 Ankara 5. \u0130dare Mahkemesinde (Mahkeme) y\u00fcr\u00fctmeyi durdurma talepli …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-142450","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n