T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
P.B. ve Z.B. BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/45376)<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 13\/3\/2025<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
RESEN G\u0130ZL\u0130L\u0130K KARARI VER\u0130LD\u0130<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Recai AKYEL<\/p>\n
Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n
\u0130rfan F\u0130DAN<\/p>\n
Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Merve ARSLANT\u00dcRK<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucular<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
1. P.B.<\/p>\n
2. Z.B.<\/p>\n
Yasal Temsilcisi<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Osman BAYRAK<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, \u00e7ocu\u011fun cinsel istismar\u0131 su\u00e7uyla ilgili soru\u015fturman\u0131n etkili \u015fekilde y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmemesi nedeniyle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n yasal temsilcisi olan baba 19\/1\/2021 tarihinde \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6z teyzelerinin cinsel istismar\u0131na maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131yla \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i olmu\u015ftur. Yasal temsilci \u015fik\u00e2yetinde 2017 y\u0131l\u0131nda da \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131n teyzeleri S.D hakk\u0131nda cinsel istismar su\u00e7undan \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i oldu\u011funu, teyze S.D. hakk\u0131nda dava a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, 19\/1\/2021 g\u00fcn\u00fc k\u0131z\u0131 P.B.nin rehber \u00f6\u011fretmeni E.V.G. ile g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesi \u00fczerine k\u0131zlar\u0131 ile ayn\u0131 evde kalan teyze S.D.nin k\u0131zlar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6zel b\u00f6lgelerine dokundu\u011funu, bu \u015fekilde cinsel istismar\u0131n devam etti\u011fini \u00f6\u011frendi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
3. Yasal temsilci 12\/3\/2019 tarihinde e\u015fi \u00d6.D.den bo\u015fanm\u0131\u015f, ortak \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 olan 2008 do\u011fumlu ba\u015fvurucu P.B.nin ve 2010 do\u011fumlu ba\u015fvurucu Z.B.nin velayetleri 22\/11\/2022 tarihinde anneden al\u0131narak yasal temsilci babaya verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. Trabzon Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) konuyla ilgili bir soru\u015fturma ba\u015flatm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucular, \u00c7ocuk Koruma ve \u0130zlem Merkezinde adli g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeciyle g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015ferek ifade vermi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucular, ifadelerinde anne ve babalar\u0131n\u0131n bo\u015fand\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, velayetleri annelerinde oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in annelerinde kald\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, 56 ya\u015f\u0131nda olan teyzeleri S.D.nin s\u0131k s\u0131k annelerine geldi\u011fini ve uzun s\u00fcre annelerinde kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu s\u00fcre\u00e7te \u00f6zel b\u00f6lgelerine dokundu\u011funu, bundan rahats\u0131z olduklar\u0131n\u0131, son dokunu\u015funun iki hafta \u00f6nce oldu\u011funu s\u00f6ylemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n annesi \u00d6.D. e\u015finden yakla\u015f\u0131k 1,5 y\u0131l \u00f6nce bo\u015fand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, k\u0131zlar\u0131n\u0131n velayetinin kendisinde oldu\u011funu, ba\u015fka bir ilde ikamet eden ablas\u0131 S.D.nin y\u0131l\u0131n belli d\u00f6nemlerinde kendisinde kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, S.D.nin k\u0131zlar\u0131na sar\u0131larak ve dokunarak sevdi\u011fini ancak cinsel yakla\u015f\u0131m\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, yasal temcilcinin \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131n velayetini alabilmek i\u00e7in iftira att\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan etmi\u015ftir. \u015e\u00fcpheli S.D. yasal temsilcinin \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131n velayetini alabilmek ve nafaka \u00f6dememek i\u00e7in kendisine iftira att\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade ederek su\u00e7lamay\u0131 kabul etmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. Bilgi sahibi s\u0131fat\u0131yla beyan\u0131na ba\u015fvurulanE.V.G. ba\u015fvurucu P.B.nin 19\/1\/2021 tarihinde saat 10.00 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda kendisini arayarak “\u015eu anda babamda kal\u0131yoruz, annemle babam ayr\u0131ld\u0131lar, ben ve karde\u015fim Z.B. annemin yan\u0131na d\u00f6nmek istemiyoruz.” dedi\u011fini, annesinin yan\u0131na neden d\u00f6nmek istemedi\u011fini sormas\u0131 \u00fczerine teyzeleri S.D.ninistemedikleri yerlerine dokundu\u011funu s\u00f6yleyerek a\u011flamaya ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, P.B.ye babas\u0131yla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmek istedi\u011fini beyan etti\u011fini, saat 10.15-10.30 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda yasal temsilci olan baban\u0131n kendisini arad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, onaP.B. ile aralar\u0131nda ge\u00e7en g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeyi aktard\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n \u00c7ocuk Koruma ve \u0130zlem Merkezinde al\u0131nan ifadeleri (bkz. \u00a7 4) do\u011frultusunda adli g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeci taraf\u0131ndan adli g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme de\u011ferlendirme raporu haz\u0131rlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Adli g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeci, ba\u015fvurucu Z.B. y\u00f6n\u00fcnden teyzesinin dokunu\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n cinsel ama\u00e7l\u0131 bir dokunma oldu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcnde net bir ifade kullanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, dokunu\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n cinsel olmay\u0131p k\u00fclt\u00fcrel sevme bi\u00e7imi olabilece\u011fi, ba\u015fvurucu P.B. y\u00f6n\u00fcnden teyzenin ergenlik d\u00f6neminde olan \u00e7ocu\u011fun mahremiyetine sayg\u0131 g\u00f6stermeyerek ma\u011fdureyi cinsel y\u00f6nden ihmal etti\u011fi, annenin de bu duruma g\u00f6z yumdu\u011fu, teyzenin ma\u011fdureye y\u00f6nelik dokunu\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n cinsel ama\u00e7l\u0131 m\u0131 yoksa sevme \u015fekli mi oldu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcnde net bir kanaate var\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015feklinde g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f bildirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. Yasal temsilci 2013 y\u0131l\u0131nda teyze S.D.nin P.B.ye y\u00f6nelik olarak cinsel istimar su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011fi iddias\u0131yla \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i olmu\u015f, S.D. hakk\u0131nda kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair verilen karar 5\/6\/2014 tarihinde itiraz\u0131n reddi ile sonu\u00e7lanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Yasal temsilci bu karar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden Anayasa Mahkemesine bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015f, ba\u015fvuru Anayasa Mahkemesinin 2015\/5690 numaral\u0131 dosyas\u0131nda s\u00fcre y\u00f6n\u00fcnden idari ret ile sonu\u00e7lanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
9. Yasal temsilci 2014 y\u0131l\u0131nda teyze S.D.nin k\u0131zlar\u0131 P.B.ye ve Z.B.ye y\u00f6nelik cinsel istimar su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011fi iddias\u0131yla \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i olmu\u015f; S.D. hakk\u0131nda kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair verilen karar 21\/11\/2014 tarihinde itiraz\u0131n reddi ile sonu\u00e7lanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
10. Yasal temsilci 2017 y\u0131l\u0131nda \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 P.B. ve Z.B.ye y\u00f6nelik cinsel istismarda bulundu\u011fu iddias\u0131yla teyze S.D.den \u015fikayet\u00e7i olmu\u015ftur. Yarg\u0131lama sonucunda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n beraatine karar\u0131 verilmi\u015f olup dava inceleme tarihi itibar\u0131yla temyiz a\u015famas\u0131nda derdesttir.<\/p>\n
11. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k daha \u00f6nce de \u015f\u00fcpheli S.D. hakk\u0131nda ayn\u0131 iddialarda bulunuldu\u011fu,yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamada \u015f\u00fcphelinin beraat etti\u011fi, cinsel istismar su\u00e7unun olu\u015fabilmesi i\u00e7in yap\u0131lan hareketlerin cinsel arzular\u0131n tatminine y\u00f6nelik, failin ula\u015fmak istedi\u011fi sonuca uygun ve objektif olarak \u015fehevi olmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi, somut olayda \u015f\u00fcphelinin ma\u011fdurelere kar\u015f\u0131 cinsel arzular\u0131n\u0131 tatminine y\u00f6nelik bir eyleminin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle \u00e7ocu\u011fun cinsel istismar\u0131 su\u00e7undan kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
12. Yasal temsilci vekili, \u015f\u00fcpheli S.D.nin benzer eylemleri nedeniyle daha \u00f6nce hakk\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131lan davada beraat etti\u011fini, \u015f\u00fcphelinin beraat ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 karardan cesaretle eylemlerine devam etti\u011fini, an\u0131lan karar\u0131n temyiz a\u015famas\u0131nda olup kesinle\u015fmedi\u011fini, Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n eylemin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fini kabul etti\u011fini ancak su\u00e7un olu\u015fabilmesi i\u00e7in yap\u0131lan hareketlerin cinsel arzular\u0131n tatminine y\u00f6nelik failin ula\u015fmak istedi\u011fi sonuca uygun ve objektif olarak \u015fehevi nitelikte olmas\u0131 gerekti\u011finden bahisle kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verilmesinin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu belirterek 29\/3\/2021 tarihinde karara itiraz etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
13. Yasal temsilcinin kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karara yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz, Trabzon 1. Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fince 9\/4\/2021 tarihinde kesin olarak reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
14. Yasal temsilci, nihai karar\u0131 13\/4\/2021 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra17\/5\/2021 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
15. Ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
16. Yasal temsilci, k\u0131zlar\u0131n\u0131n daha \u00f6nce de teyzeleri S.D.nin cinsel istismar\u0131na maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, \u015fikayetlerinin takipsizlikle sonu\u00e7land\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, a\u00e7\u0131lan ceza davas\u0131nda ise S.D.nin ceza almad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu \u015fekilde k\u0131zlar\u0131n\u0131n y\u0131llarca \u00f6z teyzeleri S.D.nin cinsel istismar\u0131na maruz b\u0131rak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, S.D.nin ak\u0131l sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n yerinde olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair rapor al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Ba\u015fvuru belgelerinin bir \u00f6rne\u011fi bilgi i\u00e7in Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6nderilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
17. Yasal temsilci, ayn\u0131 \u015f\u00fcpheli hakk\u0131nda daha \u00f6nce de benzer iddialarla \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i olmu\u015ftur (bkz. \u00a7\u00a7 8, 9, 10). Yasal temsilci ba\u015fvuru formunda daha \u00f6nceki \u015fik\u00e2yetleriyle ilgili a\u00e7\u0131klamalarda bulunmu\u015f ise de i\u015fbu ba\u015fvuru 2021 y\u0131l\u0131nda yap\u0131lan \u015fik\u00e2yet \u00fczerine sonu\u00e7lanan soru\u015fturma s\u00fcrecine ili\u015fkin olup inceleme bu kapsamda yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
18. \u0130nsan onurunun korunmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin ilk f\u0131kras\u0131nda maddi ve manevi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n korunmas\u0131 ve geli\u015ftirilmesi hakk\u0131 g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f; ayn\u0131 maddenin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131yla da ki\u015filere i\u015fkence ve eziyet yap\u0131lmas\u0131, ki\u015filerin insan haysiyetiyle ba\u011fda\u015fmayan bir cezaya veya muameleye tabi tutulmas\u0131 yasaklanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu yasak i\u00e7in herhangi bir istisnan\u0131n kabul edilmemesi ve Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 15. maddesinde sava\u015f, seferberlik veya ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc h\u00e2llerde de maddi ve manevi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne dokunulamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ifade edilmesi yasa\u011f\u0131n mutlak niteli\u011fini ortaya koymaktad\u0131r. Bununla birlikte yasak, t\u00fcm k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele durumlar\u0131n\u0131 kapsamaz. Bir muamelenin Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n kapsam\u0131na girebilmesi, asgari bir a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131k derecesine (ciddiyet seviyesine) ula\u015fmas\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r. Asgari a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131k derecesine ula\u015f\u0131l\u0131p ula\u015f\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, g\u00f6recelidir ve somut olay\u0131n ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesiyle belirlenir. Yap\u0131lacak de\u011ferlendirmede muamelenin s\u00fcresi, fiziksel ve ruhsal etkileri ile ma\u011fdurun cinsiyeti, ya\u015f\u0131 ve sa\u011fl\u0131k durumu gibi etkenler \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131r. Bu etkenlere ard\u0131ndaki kas\u0131t veya saik ile birlikte muamelenin amac\u0131 da eklenebilir. Ayr\u0131ca gerilimin ve duygular\u0131n y\u00fckseldi\u011fi atmosfer gibi muamelenin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ba\u011flam da dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gereken di\u011fer bir etkendir (Cezmi Demir ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2013\/293, 17\/7\/2014, \u00a7\u00a7 80, 83; Ali R\u0131za \u00d6zer ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2013\/3924, 6\/1\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 72, 74, 75; K.K. [GK], B. No: 2020\/34532, 29\/5\/2024, \u00a7 26).<\/p>\n
19. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n ya\u015f\u0131, \u015f\u00fcpheli ile ba\u015fvurucular aras\u0131ndaki yak\u0131nl\u0131k ve \u015f\u00fcphelinin eylemlerinin s\u00fcreklilik arz etti\u011fine y\u00f6nelik iddia dikkate al\u0131narak ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n u\u011frad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 iddia ettikleri muamelenin Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n kapsam\u0131na girebilmesi i\u00e7in gerekli asgari bir a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131k derecesine ula\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir. Bu nedenle ba\u015fvuru k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutu kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
20. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesi, devletin temel ama\u00e7 ve g\u00f6revlerini d\u00fczenleyen Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 5. maddesiyle birlikte de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde devlete birtak\u0131m negatif ve pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckler y\u00fckler (Serpil Kerimo\u011flu ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2012\/752, 17\/9\/2013, \u00a7 50; Fatma Ak\u0131n ve Mehmet Eren [GK], B. No: 2017\/26636, 10\/11\/2021, \u00a7 82). Pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckleri kapsam\u0131nda devlet; bireyleri, di\u011fer bireyler taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lanlar da d\u00e2hil olmak \u00fczere, k\u00f6t\u00fc muameleye kar\u015f\u0131 korumak i\u00e7in hukuki ve fiil\u00ee tedbirler almakla \u00f6devlidir (Cezmi Demir ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 82; R.K., B. No: 2013\/6950, 20\/4\/2016, \u00a7\u00a7 74, 75). \u00d6zellikle \u00e7ocuklar ve savunmas\u0131z bireyler etkili bir \u015fekilde korunmal\u0131d\u0131r (Z.C. [GK], B. No: 2013\/3262, 11\/5\/2016, \u00a7 84). Koruma \u00f6devi en ciddi durumlarda ceza hukuku h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe konulmas\u0131 ve bunlar\u0131n uygulamada da etkili bir \u015fekilde uygulanmas\u0131 yoluyla bireyleri, maddi ve manevi b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fcklerinin ihlallerinden yeterli \u015fekilde korumak i\u00e7in yasal bir \u00e7er\u00e7eve olu\u015fturulmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirir (baz\u0131 de\u011fi\u015fikliklerle birlikte bkz. Z.C. \u00a7 56. Ya\u015fam hakk\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yap\u0131lan k\u0131smen benzer de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7in bkz. \u0130pek Deniz ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2013\/1595, 21\/4\/2016, \u00a7 149; T.A. [GK], B. No: 2017\/32972, 29\/9\/2021, \u00a7 135). Koruma \u00f6devi ayr\u0131ca yetkililerin bir ki\u015fiye y\u00f6nelik ger\u00e7ek ve yak\u0131n bir k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele tehlikesini bildikleri veya bilmelerinin gerekti\u011fi durumlarda bu tehlikenin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesini engellemek i\u00e7in makul tedbirler almalar\u0131n\u0131 da gerektirir (Cezmi Demir ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 82; R.K., \u00a7 74). Bununla birlikte \u00f6zellikle insan davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclemezli\u011fi, \u00f6ncelikler ve kaynaklar de\u011ferlendirilerek yap\u0131lacak i\u015flem veya y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclecek faaliyet tercihi dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda koruma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn kamu makamlar\u0131 \u00fczerinde a\u015f\u0131r\u0131 y\u00fck olu\u015fturacak \u015fekilde yorumlanmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir (Serpil Kerimo\u011flu ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 53; R.K., \u00a7 76).<\/p>\n
21. Devletin k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerinin usuli bir y\u00f6n\u00fc de vard\u0131r. Bu usul y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc savunulabilir nitelikteki her k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele olay\u0131n\u0131nsorumlular\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesini ve gerekiyorsa cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flayabilecek etkili bir soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fctmeyi gerektirir. Bu soru\u015fturman\u0131n temel amac\u0131, insan onurunu koruyan hukukun etkili bir \u015fekilde uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131 ve kamu g\u00f6revlilerinin veya di\u011fer bireylerin k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele niteli\u011findeki filleri nedeniyle hesap vermelerini sa\u011flamakt\u0131r. K\u00f6t\u00fc muamelenin kasten yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ileri s\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc durumlarda iddia hakk\u0131nda ivedilikle bir ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 ba\u015flat\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. Ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131n\u0131n Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin gerektirdi\u011fi \u015fekilde etkili oldu\u011funun kabul edilebilmesi i\u00e7in soru\u015fturmada olay\u0131 ayd\u0131nlatabilecek ve sorumlular\u0131n belirlenmesini sa\u011flayabilecek t\u00fcm deliller toplanmal\u0131d\u0131r. Dahas\u0131 soru\u015fturma s\u00fcreci gerekti\u011fi \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde kamu denetimine a\u00e7\u0131k olmal\u0131, ma\u011fdur soru\u015fturmaya etkili \u015fekilde kat\u0131labilmeli vesoru\u015fturmada makul bir \u00f6zen ve s\u00fcratle hareket edilmelidir. Yetkililer, soru\u015fturmay\u0131 sonland\u0131rmak i\u00e7in aceleci davranmamal\u0131; temelden yoksun sonu\u00e7lara dayanmamal\u0131d\u0131r (Tahir Canan, B. No: 2012\/969, 18\/9\/2013, \u00a7 25; Cezmi Demir ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7\u00a7 110-112, 114-117; Ali R\u0131za \u00d6zer ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7\u00a7 101-103).<\/p>\n
22. Ba\u015fvuruya konu edilen husus, cinsel istismar iddias\u0131 hakk\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131n\u0131n etkilili\u011fi oldu\u011fundan inceleme bu kapsamda yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
23. Somut olayda yasal temsilcinin \u015fik\u00e2yeti \u00fczerine Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k derh\u00e2l soru\u015fturma ba\u015flatm\u0131\u015f, ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n \u00c7ocuk Koruma ve \u0130zlem Merkezinde ifadelerini alm\u0131\u015f, ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n anne ve babas\u0131 ile ba\u015fvurucu P.B.nin rehber \u00f6\u011fretmenini dinlemi\u015f, \u015f\u00fcpheli S.D.nin savunmas\u0131n\u0131 alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n ifadeleri do\u011frultusunda al\u0131nan adli g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme de\u011ferlendirme raporlar\u0131nda \u015f\u00fcpheli S.D.nin ba\u015fvurucu Z.B.ye dokunmas\u0131n\u0131n cinsel ama\u00e7l\u0131 olmayan k\u00fclt\u00fcrel sevme oldu\u011fu, ba\u015fvurucu P.B.ye dokunmas\u0131n\u0131n cinsel ama\u00e7l\u0131 m\u0131 yoksa sevme \u015feklinde mi oldu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcnde net bir kanaate var\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc bildirilmi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7 7).<\/p>\n
24. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, yasal temsilcinin \u015fik\u00e2yeti \u00fczerine derh\u00e2l ba\u015flatt\u0131\u011f\u0131 soru\u015fturmada ba\u015fvurucular\u0131 adli g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeciyle g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015f; adli g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeciden adli g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme de\u011ferlendirme raporu alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u015eik\u00e2yet\u00e7i olan yasal temsilcinin olay\u0131 kendisine aktard\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc rehber \u00f6\u011fretmenini, \u015f\u00fcpheli S.D.yi, olay\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi iddia edilen evde ba\u015fvurucularla birlikte kalan anne \u00d6.D.yi dinlenmi\u015ftir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, etkili bir soru\u015fturman\u0131n gere\u011fi olarak makul \u00f6zenle delilleri toplam\u0131\u015f, olay\u0131n ayd\u0131nlat\u0131lmas\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ciddiyetle ara\u015ft\u0131rma yapm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu ba\u011flamda elde edilen delillerin hukuki olarak yorumlanmas\u0131nda Anayasa’n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131ndaki g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan yasa\u011f\u0131 ihlal edecek mahiyette bir de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ya da soru\u015fturman\u0131n etkili \u015fekilde y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmedi\u011fini g\u00f6sterir herhangi bir bulguya rastlanmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
25. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n etkili soru\u015fturma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ili\u015fkin usul boyutuna y\u00f6nelik bir ihlalin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k oldu\u011fundan ba\u015fvurunun a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ bu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fe kat\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
III. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Kamuya a\u00e7\u0131k belgelerde ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n kimli\u011finin ba\u015fvurunun niteli\u011fi gere\u011fi RESEN G\u0130ZL\u0130 TUTULMASINA,<\/p>\n
B. K\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutunun ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ’in kar\u015f\u0131oyu ve OY\u00c7OKLU\u011eUYLA,<\/p>\n
C. Yarg\u0131lama giderlerinin ba\u015fvurucular \u00fczerinde BIRAKILMASINA 13\/3\/2025 tarihinde karar verildi.<\/p>\n
KAR\u015eIOY GEREK\u00c7ES\u0130<\/p>\n
1. \u00c7ocu\u011fun cinsel istismar\u0131 su\u00e7uyla ilgili soru\u015fturman\u0131n etkili \u015fekilde y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmemesi nedeniyle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131yla yap\u0131lan bireysel ba\u015fvuruda Mahkeme \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011funca ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutunun ihlal edildi\u011fine dair iddian\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksunluk nedeniyle kabul edilemez bulunmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi \u015feklindeki karar\u0131na kat\u0131lmamaktay\u0131m.<\/p>\n
2. \u00c7ocuklar\u0131n yasal temsilcisi olan baban\u0131n 19\/1\/2021 tarihinde \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6z teyzelerinin cinsel istismar\u0131na maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131yla yap\u0131lan \u015fikayet \u00fczerine ba\u015flat\u0131lan soru\u015fturmada yap\u0131lan tahkikat neticesinde Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan somut olayda \u015f\u00fcphelinin iki \u00e7ocu\u011fa kar\u015f\u0131 cinsel arzular\u0131n\u0131 tatmine y\u00f6nelik bir eyleminin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle \u00e7ocu\u011fun cinsel istismar\u0131 su\u00e7undan kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
3. Mahkememiz \u00e7o\u011funluk karar\u0131nda; baban\u0131n \u015fikayeti \u00fczerine ba\u015flat\u0131lan soru\u015fturma s\u00fcrecinde Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan i\u015flemleri s\u0131ralam\u0131\u015f, \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n ifadeleri do\u011frultusunda al\u0131nan adli de\u011ferlendirme raporlar\u0131na da at\u0131f yap\u0131larak Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan etkili bir soru\u015fturman\u0131n gere\u011fi olarak makul \u00f6zenle delilleri toplanm\u0131\u015f ve olay\u0131n ayd\u0131nlat\u0131lmas\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ciddiyetle ara\u015ft\u0131rma yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011funa i\u015faret edilmi\u015f ve buradan hareketle de elde edilen delillerin hukuki olarak yorumlanmas\u0131nda Anayasa’n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan yasa\u011f\u0131 ihlal edecek mahiyette bir de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ya da soru\u015fturman\u0131n etkili \u015fekilde y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmedi\u011fini g\u00f6sterir herhangi bir bulguya rastlanmam\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esine yer verilmi\u015ftir. (Bkz.: \u00a7\u00a7 23-24).<\/p>\n
4. Bununla birlikte, dosyadaki di\u011fer deliller yan\u0131nda \u00f6zellikle Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k\u00e7a ba\u015flat\u0131lan soru\u015fturma s\u00fcrecinde ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n \u00c7ocuk Koruma ve \u0130zlem Merkezinde adli g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeciyle g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015ferek verdikleri ifadelere binaen al\u0131nan ifadeleri do\u011frultusunda adli g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeci taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan adli g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme de\u011ferlendirme raporu esas\u0131nda yap\u0131lan soru\u015fturma s\u00fcrecindeki en \u00f6nemli delil olarak baz\u0131 \u00f6nemli tespitlerde bulunmaktad\u0131r. Adli g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeci, ba\u015fvurucu Z.B. y\u00f6n\u00fcnden teyzesinin dokunu\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n cinsel ama\u00e7l\u0131 bir dokunma oldu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcnde net bir ifade kullanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, dokunu\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n cinsel olmay\u0131p k\u00fclt\u00fcrel sevme bi\u00e7imi olabilece\u011fi, ba\u015fvurucu P.B. y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ise teyzenin ergenlik d\u00f6neminde olan \u00e7ocu\u011fun mahremiyetine sayg\u0131 g\u00f6stermeyerek ma\u011fdureyi cinsel y\u00f6nden ihmal etti\u011fi, annenin de bu duruma g\u00f6z yumdu\u011fu, teyzenin ma\u011fdureye y\u00f6nelik dokunu\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n cinsel ama\u00e7l\u0131 m\u0131 yoksa sevme \u015fekli mi oldu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcnde net bir kanaate var\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015feklinde g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f bildirmi\u015ftir (bkz.: \u00a7 7).<\/p>\n
5. G\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u00fczere adli g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeci taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan adli g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme de\u011ferlendirme raporunda \u00f6zellikle b\u00fcy\u00fck \u00e7ocuk ile ilgili teyzenin istismar iddias\u0131na y\u00f6nelik eylemlerinin cinsel ama\u00e7l\u0131 m\u0131 yoksa sevme \u015fekli mi oldu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcnde net bir kanaate ula\u015f\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespitine yer verilmektedir. Bu bi\u00e7imdeki bir tespite ra\u011fmen Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan somut olayda \u015f\u00fcphelinin ma\u011fdurelere kar\u015f\u0131 cinsel arzular\u0131n\u0131 tatminine y\u00f6nelik bir eyleminin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle \u00e7ocu\u011fun cinsel istismar\u0131 su\u00e7undan kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturmadaki \u00f6nemli bir eksikliktir.<\/p>\n
6. Bundan dolay\u0131d\u0131r ki Mahkememiz \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011funun somut olayda ula\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 elde edilen delillerin hukuki olarak yorumlanmas\u0131nda Anayasa’n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131ndaki g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan yasa\u011f\u0131 ihlal edecek mahiyette bir de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ya da soru\u015fturman\u0131n etkili \u015fekilde y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmedi\u011fini g\u00f6sterir herhangi bir bulguya rastlanmam\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu bi\u00e7imindeki gerek\u00e7eye (bkz.: \u00a7 24) kat\u0131lmak m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n
7. Bireysel ba\u015fvuruya konu olayda adli g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeci taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan adli g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme de\u011ferlendirme raporunda b\u00fcy\u00fck \u00e7ocuk ile ilgili teyzenin istismar iddias\u0131na y\u00f6nelik eylemlerinin cinsel ama\u00e7l\u0131 m\u0131 yoksa sevme \u015fekli mi oldu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcnde net bir kanaate var\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespitine yer verilmi\u015f olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen soru\u015fturman\u0131n kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin karar ile sonland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 etkili bir soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmedi\u011fini g\u00f6stermektedir.<\/p>\n
8. \u00d6zellikle konunun \u00e7ocuklara y\u00f6nelik bir cinsel istismar iddias\u0131 oldu\u011fu ve yine bu ba\u011flamda adli g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeci taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan adli g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme de\u011ferlendirme raporunda ba\u015fvuruculardan birisi ile ilgili olarak belirtilen \u201cnet bir kanaate var\u0131lmamas\u0131\u201d durumu esas\u0131nda bu konuda daha ileri ara\u015ft\u0131rmalar yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini ortaya \u00e7\u0131karmaktad\u0131r. Gerek ba\u015fvurucu \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n her ikisinin birbiriyle uyumlu ve kararl\u0131 bi\u00e7imde ifade ettikleri beyanlar\u0131 ve gerekse adli g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme de\u011ferlendirme raporundaki tespitler bunu gerektirmektedir.<\/p>\n
9. Soru\u015fturmada ula\u015f\u0131lacak sonu\u00e7tan ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z olarak ifade etmek gerekir ki bu bi\u00e7imdeki bir \u015fikayette Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesindeki k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutuna uygun etkili bir hukuksal s\u00fcrecin y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclebilmesi i\u00e7in somut ba\u015fvuruda toplanan verilerin herkesi ikna edici, objektif bir de\u011ferlendirmeye dayal\u0131 bi\u00e7imde sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 fevkalade \u00f6nem arz etmektedir.<\/p>\n
10. Sonu\u00e7 olarak yukar\u0131da s\u0131ralanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n etkili soru\u015fturma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ili\u015fkin usul boyutunun ihlal edildi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011fun ba\u015fvurunun a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksunluk nedeniyle kabul edilemez bulunmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi \u015feklindeki karar\u0131na kat\u0131lmamaktay\u0131m.<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 13\/3\/2025 tarihli ve 2021\/45376 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR P.B. ve Z.B. BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/45376) Karar Tarihi: 13\/3\/2025 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR RESEN G\u0130ZL\u0130L\u0130K KARARI VER\u0130LD\u0130 Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Recai AKYEL Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ \u0130rfan F\u0130DAN Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : Merve ARSLANT\u00dcRK Ba\u015fvurucular : 1. P.B. 2. Z.B. Yasal Temsilcisi : Osman BAYRAK I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, \u00e7ocu\u011fun cinsel istismar\u0131 su\u00e7uyla ilgili soru\u015fturman\u0131n etkili \u015fekilde y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmemesi nedeniyle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n yasal temsilcisi olan baba 19\/1\/2021 tarihinde \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6z teyzelerinin cinsel istismar\u0131na maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131yla \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i olmu\u015ftur. Yasal temsilci \u015fik\u00e2yetinde 2017 y\u0131l\u0131nda da \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131n teyzeleri S.D hakk\u0131nda cinsel istismar su\u00e7undan \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i oldu\u011funu, teyze S.D. hakk\u0131nda dava a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, 19\/1\/2021 g\u00fcn\u00fc k\u0131z\u0131 P.B.nin rehber \u00f6\u011fretmeni E.V.G. ile g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesi \u00fczerine k\u0131zlar\u0131 ile ayn\u0131 evde kalan teyze S.D.nin k\u0131zlar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6zel b\u00f6lgelerine dokundu\u011funu, bu \u015fekilde cinsel istismar\u0131n devam etti\u011fini \u00f6\u011frendi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. 3. Yasal temsilci 12\/3\/2019 tarihinde e\u015fi \u00d6.D.den bo\u015fanm\u0131\u015f, ortak \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 olan 2008 do\u011fumlu ba\u015fvurucu P.B.nin ve 2010 do\u011fumlu ba\u015fvurucu Z.B.nin velayetleri 22\/11\/2022 tarihinde anneden al\u0131narak yasal temsilci babaya verilmi\u015ftir. 4. Trabzon Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) konuyla ilgili bir soru\u015fturma ba\u015flatm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucular, \u00c7ocuk Koruma ve \u0130zlem Merkezinde adli g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeciyle g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015ferek ifade vermi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucular, ifadelerinde …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-120162","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n