T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
A. G. BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/53177)<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 30\/4\/2025<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
Metin KIRATLI<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Merve ARSLANT\u00dcRK<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru; g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda tutulma ko\u015fullar\u0131 ve kolluk g\u00f6revlilerinin kas\u0131tl\u0131 eylemleri nedeniyle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Fetullah\u00e7\u0131 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc\/Paralel Devlet Yap\u0131lanmas\u0131na (FET\u00d6\/PDY) \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan 2\/4\/2018 tarihinde yakalan\u0131p 2\/4\/2018-10\/4\/2018 tarihleri aras\u0131nda g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda tutulan ba\u015fvurucu, 11\/4\/2018 tarihinde tutuklanarak ceza infaz kurumuna sevk edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan 8 y\u0131l 9 ay hapis cezas\u0131na mahk\u00fbm edilmi\u015f ve h\u00fck\u00fcm temyiz incelemesinden ge\u00e7erek 1\/3\/2022 tarihinde kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, sulh ceza h\u00e2kimli\u011finde m\u00fcdafii huzurundaki 11\/4\/2018 tarihli sorgusunda k\u00f6t\u00fc muameleye u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde bir iddiada bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fvurucu, tutuldu\u011fu ceza infaz kurumu arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla 13\/7\/2020 tarihinde Ankara Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) bir dilek\u00e7e g\u00f6ndermi\u015f ve g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. \u0130ddias\u0131na g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucu havas\u0131z, pis ve bak\u0131ms\u0131z tuvaletleri olan, banyo yapma imk\u00e2n\u0131 ve hijyen malzemesi bulunmayan, verilen yemekleri de yetersiz olan spor salonunda g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda tutulmu\u015f; ayr\u0131ca bu s\u00fcre\u00e7te baz\u0131 polis memurlar\u0131n\u0131n sinkafl\u0131 k\u00fcf\u00fcrlerine maruz kalm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Daha sonra ba\u015fvurucu; Ter\u00f6rle M\u00fccadele Daire Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (TEM) \u015eube M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f ve d\u00f6rt\/be\u015f polis memuru taraf\u0131ndan karanl\u0131k bir odada yaln\u0131z ba\u015f\u0131na sorgulanm\u0131\u015f, burada ter\u00f6rist olmakla itham edilip hakaret edilmi\u015f, saatlerce ayakta bekletilmi\u015f, yorgun ve uykusuz h\u00e2lde ayn\u0131 gece tekrar spor salonuna g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Ba\u015fvurucu, daha sonra yine TEM \u015eube M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f; saatlerce ayakta, y\u00fcz\u00fc duvara d\u00f6n\u00fck olarak bekletilmi\u015ftir. \u0130smini M. olarak bildi\u011fi bir polis memuru aniden ensesine yumruk atarak kendisini darp etmi\u015f, sinkafl\u0131 k\u00fcf\u00fcrler ederek vurmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fvurucu bu s\u00fcrecin uykusuz b\u0131rak\u0131larak, k\u00f6t\u00fc ortamlarda tutularak, fiziksel ve s\u00f6zl\u00fc \u015fiddetle 8\/4\/2018 tarihine kadar devam etti\u011fini, yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecinin etkilenmesini istemedi\u011fi ve ismini M. olarak bildi\u011fi polis memurunun ailesine zarar vermemesi i\u00e7in \u015fik\u00e2yette bulunmak i\u00e7in bu zamana kadar bekledi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
4. Ba\u015fvurucunun su\u00e7 duyurusu \u00fczerine Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan ba\u015flat\u0131lan ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda; ba\u015fvurucunun kolluk g\u00f6revlilerinin \u015fiddetine maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc soru\u015fturmaya ili\u015fkin arama tutana\u011f\u0131, g\u00f6zalt\u0131 s\u00fcresinde ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen adli muayene raporlar\u0131, avukat g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme tutanaklar\u0131 ve ilgili evrak dosyaya eklenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucu, silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan ba\u015flat\u0131lan soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda 2\/4\/2018 tarihinde saat 06.30’da Dar\u0131ca TEM B\u00fcro Amirli\u011fi g\u00f6revlilerince evinde yakalanarak g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucunun g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131ndan sonra hakk\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen t\u0131bbi raporlar \u015fu \u015fekildedir:<\/p>\n
i. Dar\u0131ca Farabi Devlet Hastanesinin 2\/4\/2018 tarihinde saat 07.00’de d\u00fczenlenen genel adli muayene raporunda yeni olu\u015fan lezyon saptanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015f, 2\/4\/2018 tarihinde saat 15.15’te d\u00fczenlenen genel adli muayene raporunda darp vecebirin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespit edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
ii. Ankara Gazi Mustafa Kemal Devlet Hastanesinin 3\/4\/2018-10\/4\/2018 tarihleri aras\u0131nda her g\u00fcn i\u00e7in ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 d\u00fczenlenen genel adli muayene raporlar\u0131nda darp ve cebir izine rastlanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015f, tarihsiz iki raporda da darp ve cebir bulgusunun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespit edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. Ba\u015fvurucunun g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcre\u00e7te 2\/4\/2018, 3\/4\/2018, 4\/4\/2018, 7\/4\/2018 ve 10\/4\/2018 tarihlerinde olmak \u00fczere toplam be\u015f kez avukat\u0131 ile g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne dair avukat g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme tutanaklar\u0131 tanzim edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. Ba\u015fvurucunun ceza infaz kurumuna giri\u015finden sonra yap\u0131lan 13\/4\/2018 tarihli ilk muayenesinde travmatik bir lezyonun saptanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. Y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturma neticesinde Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan ilgililer hakk\u0131nda i\u015fkence yapma su\u00e7undan kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karar verilmi\u015ftir. Kararda, ba\u015fvurucunun yakalanmas\u0131 ve sonras\u0131nda s\u00fcrekli adli raporlar\u0131n\u0131n temin edildi\u011fi, bu raporlar\u0131nda herhangi bir yaralanmas\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6zlemlenmedi\u011finin belirtildi\u011fi, ayr\u0131ca ba\u015fvurucunun kendisine y\u00f6nelik fiillerin i\u015flenmesine \u015fahit olan hi\u00e7 kimsenin isminin verilmedi\u011fi, bu nedenle olaya dair tan\u0131k dinlenmesinin de m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ba\u015fvurucunun beyan\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda yeterli delil olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7e olarak a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucunun itiraz\u0131, Ankara 7. Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fince 22\/3\/2021 tarihinde reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fvurucu, nihai karar\u0131 23\/4\/2021 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra 5\/5\/2021 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
10. Ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
11. \u00d6deme g\u00fcc\u00fcnden yoksun oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurucunun adli yard\u0131m talebinin kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
A. G\u00f6zalt\u0131nda Tutulma Ko\u015fullar\u0131ndan Dolay\u0131 K\u00f6t\u00fc Muamele Yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia <\/p>\n
12. Ba\u015fvurucu; spor salonunda g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda tutuldu\u011fu s\u00fcre\u00e7te kendisine yeterli yiyecek ve i\u00e7ecek verilmedi\u011fini, hijyen ko\u015fullar\u0131na uygun ortam sa\u011flanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, yatma ve \u0131s\u0131nma i\u00e7in gerekli malzemelerin verilmedi\u011fini belirterek Anayasa’n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
13. Bireysel ba\u015fvuru yolunun ikincil niteli\u011fi gere\u011fi, Anayasa Mahkemesine ba\u015fvuruda bulunulabilmesi i\u00e7in \u00f6ncelikle ola\u011fan kanun yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmesi zorunludur (\u0130smail Bu\u011fra \u0130\u015flek [1. B.], B. No: 2013\/1177, 26\/3\/2013, \u00a7 17).<\/p>\n
14. G\u00f6zalt\u0131 i\u015fleminden sonra sal\u0131verilen veya tutuklanan ki\u015filerin, g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda tutulduklar\u0131 yerin ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele olu\u015fturdu\u011funa ili\u015fkin iddialar\u0131 hakk\u0131nda t\u00fcketmeleri gereken ba\u015fvuru yolu tazminat davas\u0131d\u0131r (bkz. Nebahat Baysal G\u00fcl [2. B.], B. No: 2016\/14634, 28\/5\/2019, \u00a7 23). Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k Mahkemesine g\u00f6re bu dava, adli yarg\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r (bkz. Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k Mahkemesinin 18\/4\/2022 tarihli ve E.2022\/145, K.2022\/206 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile 30\/5\/2022 tarihli ve E.2022\/211, K.2022\/295 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131). Ba\u015fvurucu, tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7madan bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulundu\u011fu i\u00e7in ihlal iddias\u0131 hakk\u0131nda hukuk sisteminde mevcut ba\u015fvuru yolunu t\u00fcketmedi\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
15. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurunun bu k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
B. Kolluk G\u00f6revlilerinin Kas\u0131tl\u0131 Eylemlerinden Dolay\u0131 K\u00f6t\u00fc Muamele Yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
16. Ba\u015fvurucu; g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda bulundu\u011fu s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde insan onuruna ve haysiyetine yak\u0131\u015fmayacak \u015fekilde fiziki ve s\u00f6zl\u00fc i\u015fkenceye maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ciddi sa\u011fl\u0131k problemleri ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, saatlerce s\u00fcren m\u00fclakat ad\u0131 alt\u0131nda i\u015fkence seanslar\u0131na tabi tutuldu\u011funu, karanl\u0131k k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck odalarda bekletildi\u011fini, be\u015f polis memurunun 10 m\u00b2 bir odada ifadesini ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, \u00f6zellikle kafas\u0131n\u0131n arkas\u0131na ve ensesine sert darbeler ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, iz b\u0131rakmayacak \u015fekilde profesyonelce i\u015fkence yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, doktor raporlar\u0131n\u0131n ger\u00e7e\u011fi yans\u0131tmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
17. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde; ba\u015fvurucunun dikkat ve \u00f6zen y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ile ba\u011fda\u015fmayacak \u015fekilde \u015fik\u00e2yet etti\u011fi olaylar\u0131n \u00fczerinden yakla\u015f\u0131k 2,5 y\u0131l ge\u00e7tikten sonra \u015fik\u00e2yette bulundu\u011fu, ba\u015fvurucunun k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele iddialar\u0131 ile ilgili herhangi bir delil sunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ba\u015fvurucunun adli raporlar\u0131n\u0131n eksiksiz temin edildi\u011fi, avukat\u0131 e\u015fli\u011finde verdi\u011fi ifadesinde de bireysel ba\u015fvuruya konu etti\u011fi k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele iddialar\u0131na de\u011finmedi\u011fi belirtilerek iddialar\u0131n incelenmesi s\u0131ras\u0131nda Anayasa ve ilgili mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmleri, Anayasa Mahkemesi i\u00e7tihad\u0131 ve somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi bildirilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 ba\u015fvuru formundaki iddialar\u0131n\u0131 yinelemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
18. Ba\u015fvuru, k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
19. \u0130spat k\u00fclfetinin devlete ge\u00e7ti\u011fi durumlar\u0131n s\u00f6z konusu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 h\u00e2llerde k\u00f6t\u00fc muameleye u\u011framalar\u0131 nedeniyle ma\u011fdur olduklar\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcren ki\u015filer, k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131 kapsam\u0131na giren a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131kta bir muamele g\u00f6rm\u00fc\u015f olabileceklerini g\u00f6steren emare ve delilleri -hakl\u0131 bir gerek\u00e7eleri olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcrece- zaman\u0131nda yetkili makamlara sunma konusunda \u00f6zenli davranmakla y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcd\u00fcr. Olgulara dayanmayan yetersiz a\u00e7\u0131klamalar, iddialar\u0131n deliller ile desteklenmemesi hatta kimi zaman delillerin uyumsuzlu\u011fu veya k\u00f6t\u00fc muamelenin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 yer, zaman ve di\u011fer konulardaki \u00e7eli\u015fkili ifadeler gibi hususlar k\u00f6t\u00fc muamelenin ger\u00e7ekli\u011fini \u015f\u00fcpheye d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcr. Bu durumda iddian\u0131n savunabilir oldu\u011fundan, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla bu iddialara ili\u015fkin derh\u00e2l resm\u00ee bir soru\u015fturma ba\u015flat\u0131lmas\u0131 gereklili\u011finden s\u00f6z edilemez. Kald\u0131 ki iddialar\u0131n\u0131 g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc bir dayanakla birlikte yetkili merciler nezdinde dile getirmemeleri h\u00e2linde ma\u011fdur oldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcren ki\u015filerin etkili bir soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesine ili\u015fkin me\u015fru (hakl\u0131) bir beklentiye girebileceklerinin s\u00f6ylenebilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir (Beyza Metin [1. B.], B. No: 2014\/19426, 12\/12\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 45-47).<\/p>\n
20. Somut olayda ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 2\/4\/2018 tarihinde Dar\u0131ca Farabi Devlet Hastanesinden farkl\u0131 saatlerde iki kez rapor al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f olup ilk raporda yeni olu\u015fan lezyon saptanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ikinci raporda darp ve cebir bulgusunun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespit edilmi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7 5, i). Ba\u015fvurucunun g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda tutuldu\u011fu 3\/4\/2018-10\/4\/2018 tarihleri aras\u0131nda her g\u00fcn Ankara Gazi Mustafa Kemal Devlet Hastanesinden rapor al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f, al\u0131nan raporlarda darp ve cebirin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespit edilmi\u015f, ayn\u0131 hastanenin tarihsiz iki raporunda da ayn\u0131 tespit yinelenmi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7 5, ii). Yine ba\u015fvurucunun 13\/4\/2018 tarihli ceza infaz kurumundaki ilk muayenesinde de travmatik bir lezyonun saptanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7 7). Her ne kadar ba\u015fvurucu g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda kafas\u0131n\u0131n arkas\u0131na ve ensesine sert darbeler ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015f ise de hekim raporlar\u0131ndaki tespitler ile ba\u015fvurucunun iddialar\u0131n\u0131n uyumlu oldu\u011fu s\u00f6ylenemez. Di\u011fer taraftan ba\u015fvurucu sulh ceza h\u00e2kimli\u011finde m\u00fcdafii e\u015fli\u011finde al\u0131nan11\/4\/2018 tarihli sorgusunda da k\u00f6t\u00fc muameleye maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde bir iddiada bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu, maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 k\u00f6t\u00fc muameleyi korkusundan doktorlara s\u00f6yleyemedi\u011fini iddia etmi\u015f ise de g\u00f6zalt\u0131 s\u00fcrecinde birden fazla kez avukat\u0131 ile g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme imk\u00e2n\u0131 bulan ba\u015fvurucunun maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015fiddeti avukat\u0131na anlatmayarak hemen \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i olmamas\u0131 daiddialar\u0131n\u0131n ger\u00e7ekli\u011fi hususunda \u015f\u00fcphe uyand\u0131rmaktad\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucunun s\u00f6zl\u00fc \u015fiddet iddialar\u0131n\u0131 destekleyen bir veri de dosya kapsam\u0131nda bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Ayr\u0131ca ba\u015fvurucu k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele iddialar\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6zen y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ile ba\u011fda\u015fmayacak \u015fekilde g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131n \u00fczerinden iki y\u0131l\u0131 a\u015fk\u0131n bir s\u00fcre ge\u00e7tikten sonra ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. T\u00fcm bu tespitlere g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucunun k\u00f6t\u00fc muameleye maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin savunulabilir bir iddia ortaya koyamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
21. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurunun bu k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Adli yard\u0131m talebinin KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n
B. 1. G\u00f6zalt\u0131nda tutulma ko\u015fullar\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
2. Kolluk g\u00f6revlilerinin kas\u0131tl\u0131 eylemlerinden dolay\u0131 k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
C. 12\/1\/2011 tarihli ve 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu’nun 339. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca tahsil edilmesi ma\u011fduriyetine neden olaca\u011f\u0131ndan adli yard\u0131m talebi kabul edilen ba\u015fvurucunun yarg\u0131lama giderlerini \u00f6demekten TAMAMEN MUAF TUTULMASINA 30\/4\/2025 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 30\/4\/2025 tarihli ve 2021\/53177 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR A. G. BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/53177) Karar Tarihi: 30\/4\/2025 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR Metin KIRATLI Raport\u00f6r : Merve ARSLANT\u00dcRK Ba\u015fvurucu : I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru; g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda tutulma ko\u015fullar\u0131 ve kolluk g\u00f6revlilerinin kas\u0131tl\u0131 eylemleri nedeniyle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Fetullah\u00e7\u0131 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc\/Paralel Devlet Yap\u0131lanmas\u0131na (FET\u00d6\/PDY) \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan 2\/4\/2018 tarihinde yakalan\u0131p 2\/4\/2018-10\/4\/2018 tarihleri aras\u0131nda g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda tutulan ba\u015fvurucu, 11\/4\/2018 tarihinde tutuklanarak ceza infaz kurumuna sevk edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan 8 y\u0131l 9 ay hapis cezas\u0131na mahk\u00fbm edilmi\u015f ve h\u00fck\u00fcm temyiz incelemesinden ge\u00e7erek 1\/3\/2022 tarihinde kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, sulh ceza h\u00e2kimli\u011finde m\u00fcdafii huzurundaki 11\/4\/2018 tarihli sorgusunda k\u00f6t\u00fc muameleye u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde bir iddiada bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 3. Ba\u015fvurucu, tutuldu\u011fu ceza infaz kurumu arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla 13\/7\/2020 tarihinde Ankara Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) bir dilek\u00e7e g\u00f6ndermi\u015f ve g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. \u0130ddias\u0131na g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucu havas\u0131z, pis ve bak\u0131ms\u0131z tuvaletleri olan, banyo yapma imk\u00e2n\u0131 ve hijyen malzemesi bulunmayan, verilen yemekleri de yetersiz olan spor salonunda g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda tutulmu\u015f; ayr\u0131ca bu s\u00fcre\u00e7te baz\u0131 polis memurlar\u0131n\u0131n sinkafl\u0131 k\u00fcf\u00fcrlerine maruz kalm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Daha sonra ba\u015fvurucu; Ter\u00f6rle M\u00fccadele Daire Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (TEM) \u015eube M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f ve d\u00f6rt\/be\u015f polis memuru taraf\u0131ndan …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-120127","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n