T.C.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay<\/p>\n
6. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n
2022\/1274 E., 2023\/2273 K.<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
\u0130NCELENEN KARARIN
\nMAHKEMES\u0130 : Ankara B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 4. Hukuk Dairesi
\nSAYISI : 2019\/1361 E., 2021\/3019 K.
\nDAVA TAR\u0130H\u0130 : 25.12.2015
\nH\u00dcK\u00dcM\/KARAR : Red
\n\u0130LK DERECE MAHKEMES\u0130 : Konya 6. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi
\nSAYISI : 2019\/8 E., 2019\/227 K.<\/p>\n
Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki itiraz\u0131n iptali davas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince davan\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile daval\u0131n\u0131n takip dosyas\u0131nda yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu itiraz\u0131n iptaline, takibin kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 yerden devam\u0131na, toplam takip miktar\u0131n\u0131n %20’si oran\u0131nda icra inkar tazminat\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131dan al\u0131narak davac\u0131ya verilmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Karar\u0131n daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istinaf edilmesi \u00fczerine, B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince ba\u015fvurunun k\u0131smen kabul\u00fc ile \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi h\u00fckm\u00fc kald\u0131r\u0131larak yeniden esas hakk\u0131nda h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmak suretiyle davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne, daval\u0131n\u0131n itiraz\u0131n iptaline, takibin kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 yerden devam\u0131na, icra takibine konu 101.527,20 TL as\u0131l alaca\u011f\u0131n % 20’si oran\u0131nda icra inkar tazminat\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131dan al\u0131narak davac\u0131ya verilmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131 taraf vekillerince temyiz edilmekle; kesinlik, s\u00fcre, temyiz \u015fart\u0131 ve di\u011fer usul eksiklikleri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yap\u0131lan \u00f6n inceleme sonucunda, temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin kabul\u00fcne karar verildikten ve Tetkik H\u00e2kimi taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan rapor dinlendikten sonra dosyadaki belgeler incelenip gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n
I. DAVA
\nDavac\u0131 y\u00fcklenici vekili dava dilek\u00e7esinde; daval\u0131 ile aras\u0131nda akdedilen 07\/06\/2012 tarihli hizmet s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi gere\u011fince Ak\u015fehir, Bey\u015fehir, Bozk\u0131r, Ermenek, Ilg\u0131n, Karaman, Nev\u015fehir, Seydi\u015fehir il ve il\u00e7elerinde elektrik saya\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 okuma i\u015fini \u00fcstlendi\u011fini, s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin 4.3. maddesinde “i\u015fin ifas\u0131 ile ilgili olarak her t\u00fcrl\u00fc ara\u00e7, ekipman ve yard\u0131mc\u0131 malzeme ile sarf malzemesinin daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan teslim edilece\u011finin” belirtildi\u011fini, s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin 6.11. maddesinde de “endeks\u00f6r cihazlar\u0131n\u0131n yedek pil ve \u015farj aletiyle birlikte y\u00fckleniciye teslim edilip, i\u015f bitiminde ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde teslim al\u0131naca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n” kararla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, daval\u0131n\u0131n i\u015fin ifas\u0131 i\u00e7in davac\u0131 y\u00fckleniciye teslim edilen endeks\u00f6r cihazlar\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 haks\u0131z olarak kira talep etti\u011fini ve kira bedeline ili\u015fkin 31\/07\/2012-30\/11\/2013 tarihleri aras\u0131nda 16 adet faturalar keserek davac\u0131ya g\u00f6nderdi\u011fini, daval\u0131n\u0131n s\u00f6zle\u015fmeden dolay\u0131 endeks\u00f6r kiras\u0131 isteme hakk\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, daval\u0131n\u0131n, davac\u0131n\u0131n s\u00f6zle\u015fme gere\u011fi do\u011fan alaca\u011f\u0131ndan re’sen tahsil etti\u011fi endeks\u00f6r kiras\u0131 bedellerinin iadesi i\u00e7in icra takibi ba\u015flat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, i\u015f s\u00fcresince zay\u0131f durumdaki m\u00fcvekkilinin kesintilere itiraz edemedi\u011fini ve i\u015fe devam etti\u011fini, daval\u0131n\u0131n icra takibine yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz \u00fczerine takibin durdu\u011funu, 1 y\u0131l i\u00e7inde \u0131slah yapmak kayd\u0131yla k\u0131smi dava a\u00e7\u0131labilece\u011fini ve itiraz\u0131n haks\u0131z oldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrerek icra takibine itiraz\u0131n iptaline ve icra inkar tazminat\u0131na karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015f, dava dilek\u00e7esinde fazlaya ili\u015fkin haklar\u0131n\u0131 sakl\u0131 tutarak dava de\u011ferini 15.000,00 TL g\u00f6stermi\u015f, 02\/01\/2017 tarihinde ise takibe giren t\u00fcm tutar \u00fczerinden \u0131slah harc\u0131 yat\u0131rmak suretiyle har\u00e7 ikmali yapm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
II. CEVAP
\nDaval\u0131 i\u015f sahibi vekili cevap dilek\u00e7esinde; davac\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131n\u0131n temin etti\u011fi endeks\u00f6r cihazlar\u0131n\u0131 kira kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu cihazlardan dolay\u0131 kira bedeli \u00f6demek zorunda oldu\u011funu, davan\u0131n k\u0131smi dava olarak a\u00e7\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131, hakedi\u015f belgelerinin ihtirazi kay\u0131ts\u0131z imzaland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, delil s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi oldu\u011funu savunarak davan\u0131n reddini istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
III. \u0130LK DERECE MAHKEMES\u0130 KARARI
\n\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da tarih ve say\u0131s\u0131 belirtilen karar\u0131 ile h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nan 01\/06\/2016 tarihli bilirki\u015fi raporunda belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere taraflar aras\u0131ndaki s\u00f6zle\u015fmede i\u015fin ifas\u0131 i\u00e7in endeks\u00f6r cihazlar\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan temin edilerek, davac\u0131ya teslimi ve i\u015f bitiminde iadesi kararla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen, s\u00f6zle\u015fmede endeks\u00f6r cihazlar\u0131n\u0131n i\u015fin ifas\u0131 i\u00e7in davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle daval\u0131ya kira bedeli \u00f6denece\u011fine dair herhangi bir h\u00fck\u00fcm bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan daval\u0131n\u0131n davac\u0131dan endeks\u00f6r cihaz\u0131 kiras\u0131 isteyemeyece\u011fi, bu ama\u00e7la tahsil etti\u011fi bedelleri iade etmesi gerekti\u011fi, davac\u0131n\u0131n alaca\u011f\u0131, 24 adet fatura bedeline istinaden 105.586,40 TL. oldu\u011fu halde icra takibinde 101.527,70 TL. istenilmesi ve talepten fazlaya karar verilemeyece\u011finden 101.527,70 TL.lik as\u0131l alacak y\u00f6n\u00fcnden talebin kabul\u00fc gerekti\u011fi, takip \u00f6ncesi d\u00f6nem i\u00e7in de davac\u0131 taraf\u0131n alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6denmesi talebine daval\u0131n\u0131n 06\/08\/2014 tarihli cevabi yaz\u0131 ile olumsuz cevap verdi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan daval\u0131n\u0131n 07\/08\/2014 tarihi itibariyle temerr\u00fcte d\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, as\u0131l alacak 101.527,70 TL.ye temerr\u00fct tarihi 07\/08\/2014 tarihi ile takip tarihi olan 23\/10\/2015 d\u00f6nemi i\u00e7in re’sen yasal faiz hesab\u0131 yap\u0131larak i\u015flemi\u015f faizin takip talebinde istenildi\u011fi gibi 11.065,13 TL. oldu\u011fu hesap edildi\u011fi, takip \u00f6ncesi d\u00f6nem i\u00e7in i\u015flemi\u015f faiz y\u00f6n\u00fcnden de davac\u0131n\u0131n talebinin kabul\u00fcn\u00fcn gerekti\u011fi, alaca\u011f\u0131n miktar\u0131 belirli (ve belirlenebilir) olup bu haliyle likit oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle davan\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile daval\u0131 itiraz\u0131n\u0131n iptaline, takibin devam\u0131na, toplam takip miktar\u0131n\u0131n %20’si oran\u0131nda icra inkar tazminat\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131dan tahsiline karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
IV. \u0130ST\u0130NAF
\nA. \u0130stinaf Yoluna Ba\u015fvuranlar
\n\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da belirtilen karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde daval\u0131 i\u015fsahibi vekili istinaf ba\u015fvurusunda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
B. \u0130stinaf Sebepleri
\nDaval\u0131 i\u015fsahibi vekili istinaf dilek\u00e7esinde; itiraz\u0131n iptali davas\u0131nda davac\u0131n\u0131n 15.000,00 TL \u00fczerinden dava a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, mahiyeti gere\u011fi bu davan\u0131n k\u0131smi dava olarak a\u00e7\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bir y\u0131ll\u0131k hak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc s\u00fcre i\u00e7erisinde davac\u0131n\u0131n davas\u0131n\u0131 \u0131slah etmedi\u011fini, harc\u0131 bir y\u0131l ge\u00e7tikten sonra tamamlad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131 ile aras\u0131ndaki 07\/06\/2012 tarihli s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin 4.2, 4.3, 8.3 numaral\u0131 maddeleri gere\u011fince davaya konu edilen ara\u00e7 gere\u00e7 ve ekipmanlar\u0131n temininin y\u00fcklenicinin sorumlulu\u011funda oldu\u011funu, y\u00fcklenicinin s\u00f6zle\u015fmeden do\u011fan bor\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n hakedi\u015flerinden kesilece\u011fini, davac\u0131n\u0131n endeks\u00f6r cihazlar\u0131n\u0131 kendisinden kira bedelini \u00f6demek suretiyle tedarik etmeyi tercih etti\u011fini, davac\u0131n\u0131n icra takibi ile talep etti\u011fi bedellerin s\u00f6zle\u015fme ile temin etmeyi y\u00fcklendi\u011fi cihaz ve sarf malzemelerinin kendisinden kiralanmas\u0131 nedeniyle \u00f6dedi\u011fi kira bedelinin iadesine ili\u015fkin oldu\u011funu, s\u00f6zle\u015fme imzalamadan \u00f6nce davac\u0131 firmaya g\u00f6nderdi\u011fi 15\/03\/2012 tarihli elektronik postada endeks okuma hizmet al\u0131m i\u015finde endeks\u00f6r cihazlar\u0131n\u0131n ayl\u0131k 120,00 TL bedel ile kiralanaca\u011f\u0131 hususunda bilgilendirme yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n buna itiraz etmedi\u011fini, ihaleyi alarak s\u00f6zle\u015fmeyi ihtirazi kay\u0131ts\u0131z imzalad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131ya kiralanan endeks\u00f6r cihazlar\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fclkiyeti kendisine ait oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in bu cihazlar\u0131n kullan\u0131m\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 davac\u0131dan kira talep edebilece\u011fini, ihale ile \u00fcstlendi\u011fi i\u015fin kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 hakedi\u015flerini ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, hakedi\u015f belgelerini ihtirazi kay\u0131ts\u0131z imzalad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, icra inkar tazminat\u0131n\u0131n takip miktar\u0131 \u00fczerinden de\u011fil as\u0131l alacak \u00fczerinden hesaplanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini belirterek ilk derece mahkemesinin karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 ve davan\u0131n reddini istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
C. Gerek\u00e7e ve Sonu\u00e7
\nB\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da tarih ve say\u0131s\u0131 belirtilen karar\u0131 ile mahkemenin vak\u0131a ve hukuki de\u011ferlendirmesinde usul ve esas y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilerek daval\u0131n\u0131n sair istinaf itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddine ancak mahkemece, icra takibine konu as\u0131l alaca\u011f\u0131n %20’si oran\u0131nda icra inkar tazminat\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131dan al\u0131narak davac\u0131ya verilmesine karar verilmesi gerekirken, toplam takip miktar\u0131n\u0131n %20’si oran\u0131nda icra inkar tazminat\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131dan al\u0131narak davac\u0131ya verilmesine karar verilmesi hatal\u0131 oldu\u011fundan daval\u0131n\u0131n i\u015fbu istinaf itiraz\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 suretiyle davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne, daval\u0131n\u0131n itiraz\u0131n\u0131n iptaline, takibin kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 yerden devam\u0131na, takibe konu 101.527,20 TL as\u0131l alaca\u011f\u0131n %20 ‘si oran\u0131nda icra inkar tazminat\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131dan al\u0131narak davac\u0131ya verilmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
V. TEMY\u0130Z
\nA. Temyiz Yoluna Ba\u015fvuranlar
\nB\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da belirtilen karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde taraf vekillerince temyiz isteminde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
B. Temyiz Sebepleri
\nDavac\u0131 y\u00fcklenici vekili temyiz dilek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zetle; as\u0131l alacak \u00fczerinden hesaplanan icra inkar tazminat\u0131n\u0131n usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu, takip \u00f6ncesi i\u015flemi\u015f faizinde icra inkar tazminat\u0131 hesab\u0131nda dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrerek h\u00fckm\u00fcn d\u00fczeltilerek onanmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Daval\u0131 i\u015f sahibi vekili temyizi dilek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zetle; itiraz\u0131n iptali olan i\u015f bu davada davac\u0131n\u0131n 15.000,00 TL \u00fczerinden dava a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ancak mahiyeti gere\u011fi bu davan\u0131n k\u0131smi dava olarak a\u00e7\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bir y\u0131ll\u0131k hak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc s\u00fcre i\u00e7erisinde davac\u0131n\u0131n davas\u0131n\u0131 \u0131slah etmedi\u011fini, davan\u0131n harc\u0131n\u0131 bir y\u0131l ge\u00e7tikten sonra tamamlad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131 ile aras\u0131ndaki 07\/06\/2012 tarihli s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin 4.2, 4.3, 8.3 numaral\u0131 maddeleri gere\u011fince davaya konu edilen ara\u00e7 gere\u00e7 ve ekipmanlar\u0131n temininin y\u00fcklenicinin sorumlulu\u011funda oldu\u011funu, y\u00fcklenicinin s\u00f6zle\u015fmeden do\u011fan bor\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n hakedi\u015flerinden kesilece\u011fini, davac\u0131n\u0131n endeks\u00f6r cihazlar\u0131n\u0131 kendisinden kira bedelini \u00f6demek suretiyle tedarik etmeyi tercih etti\u011fini, davac\u0131n\u0131n icra takibi ile talep etti\u011fi bedellerin s\u00f6zle\u015fme ile temin etmeyi y\u00fcklendi\u011fi cihaz ve sarf malzemelerinin kendisinden kiralanmas\u0131 nedeniyle \u00f6dedi\u011fi kira bedelinin iadesine ili\u015fkin oldu\u011funu, s\u00f6zle\u015fme imzalamadan \u00f6nce davac\u0131 firmaya g\u00f6nderdi\u011fi 15\/03\/2012 tarihli elektronik postada endeks okuma hizmet al\u0131m i\u015finde endeks\u00f6r cihazlar\u0131n\u0131n ayl\u0131k 120,00 TL bedel ile kiralanaca\u011f\u0131 hususunda bilgilendirme yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n buna itiraz etmedi\u011fini, ihaleyi alarak s\u00f6zle\u015fmeyi ihtirazi kay\u0131ts\u0131z imzalad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131ya kiralanan endeks\u00f6r cihazlar\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fclkiyeti kendisine ait oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in bu cihazlar\u0131n kullan\u0131m\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 davac\u0131dan kira talep edebilece\u011fini, ihale ile \u00fcstlendi\u011fi i\u015fin kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 hakedi\u015flerini ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, hakedi\u015f belgelerini ihtirazi kay\u0131ts\u0131z imzalad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek h\u00fckm\u00fcn bozulmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
C. Gerek\u00e7e
\n1. Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k ve Hukuki Nitelendirme
\nUyu\u015fmazl\u0131k, 07.06.2012 tarihli hizmet s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi gere\u011fince daval\u0131 i\u015f sahibince davac\u0131n\u0131n hakedi\u015f bedeli alaca\u011f\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan kesintinin tahsili i\u00e7in giri\u015filen icra takibine itiraz\u0131n iptali istemine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. \u0130lgili Hukuk
\n6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanununun 369 ncu maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 ile 370 ve 371 nci maddeleri, 2004 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130cra \u0130flas Kanunu’nun 67\/I maddesi.<\/p>\n
3. De\u011ferlendirme
\n1. Taraflar\u0131n iddia, savunma ve dayand\u0131klar\u0131 belgelere, uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n hukuki nitelendirilmesi ile uygulanmas\u0131 gereken hukuk kurallar\u0131na, dava \u015fartlar\u0131na, yarg\u0131lamaya h\u00e2kim olan ilkelere, ispat kurallar\u0131na ve temyiz olunan kararda belirtilen gerek\u00e7elere g\u00f6re davac\u0131 y\u00fcklenici vekilinin t\u00fcm, daval\u0131 i\u015f sahibi vekilinin a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki paragraf\u0131n kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki di\u011fer temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f, reddi gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
2. Davac\u0131 y\u00fcklenici taraf\u0131ndan 23\/10\/2015 tarihli takip talebi ile 101.527,20 TL as\u0131l alacak ve 11.065,13 TL i\u015flemi\u015f faiz olmak \u00fczere toplamda 112.592,33 TL \u00fczerinden takibe ge\u00e7ilmesine ve daval\u0131 i\u015f sahibince 06\/11\/2015 tarihli itiraz dilek\u00e7esi ile borcun tamam\u0131na itiraz edilmesine ra\u011fmen huzurdaki itiraz\u0131n iptali davas\u0131 – g\u00f6revsiz mahkemeye – 25\/12\/2015 tarihinde 15.000,00 TL \u00fczerinden k\u0131smi dava \u015feklinde a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Her ne kadar daval\u0131 bor\u00e7lunun itiraz\u0131 davac\u0131 alacakl\u0131ya 2004 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130cra \u0130flas Kanunu’nun 67\/I gere\u011fince tebli\u011f edilmemi\u015fse de, davac\u0131 alacakl\u0131 i\u015fbu itiraz\u0131n iptali davas\u0131n\u0131 25\/12\/2015 tarihinde a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan kanunda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen 1 y\u0131ll\u0131k hak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc s\u00fcrenin de 25\/12\/2015 tarihinden itibaren i\u015flemeye ba\u015flayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fcnde zorunluluk bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Davac\u0131 alacakl\u0131 vekili yarg\u0131lama s\u0131ras\u0131nda takibe giren ve davada talep edilmeyen bakiye alaca\u011fa ili\u015fkin olarak 02\/01\/2017 tarihinde \u0131slah harc\u0131 yat\u0131rmak suretiyle har\u00e7 ikmalinde bulunmu\u015fsa da, i\u015fbu har\u00e7 ikmalinin 1 y\u0131ll\u0131k hak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc s\u00fcre ge\u00e7tikten sonra yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Hak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc s\u00fcre, itiraz niteli\u011finde olup hakim taraf\u0131ndan re’sen dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi gibi daval\u0131 yanca da bu itiraz\u0131n istinaf ve temyiz sebebi olarak ileri s\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden, mahkemece \u0131slah harc\u0131 ile art\u0131r\u0131lan k\u0131s\u0131m dikkate al\u0131nmadan dava dilek\u00e7esi ile 1 y\u0131ll\u0131k hak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc s\u00fcre i\u00e7erisinde talep edilip de har\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lan dava de\u011feri olan 15.000,00 TL \u00fczerinden davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne ve kabul edilen 15.000,00 TL’lik dava de\u011feri \u00fczerinden davac\u0131 yarar\u0131na icra inkar tazminat\u0131na h\u00fckmedilmesi gerekirken yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm tesisi isabetsiz oldu\u011fundan h\u00fckm\u00fcn daval\u0131 i\u015f sahibi yarar\u0131na bozulmas\u0131 gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
VI. KARAR
\nA\u00e7\u0131klanan sebeple ;<\/p>\n
Temyiz olunan B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n BOZULMASINA,<\/p>\n
Pe\u015fin al\u0131nan temyiz karar harc\u0131n\u0131n istek h\u00e2linde ilgiliye iadesine,<\/p>\n
Dosyan\u0131n karar\u0131 veren B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmesine,<\/p>\n
08\/06\/2023 tarihinde oy birli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bYarg\u0131tay 6. Hukuk Dairesi\u2019nin 08\/06\/2023 tarihli, 2022\/1274 E., 2023\/2273 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 6. Hukuk Dairesi 2022\/1274 E., 2023\/2273 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” \u0130NCELENEN KARARIN MAHKEMES\u0130 : Ankara B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 4. Hukuk Dairesi SAYISI : 2019\/1361 E., 2021\/3019 K. DAVA TAR\u0130H\u0130 : 25.12.2015 H\u00dcK\u00dcM\/KARAR : Red \u0130LK DERECE MAHKEMES\u0130 : Konya 6. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi SAYISI : 2019\/8 E., 2019\/227 K. Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki itiraz\u0131n iptali davas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince davan\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile daval\u0131n\u0131n takip dosyas\u0131nda yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu itiraz\u0131n iptaline, takibin kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 yerden devam\u0131na, toplam takip miktar\u0131n\u0131n %20’si oran\u0131nda icra inkar tazminat\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131dan al\u0131narak davac\u0131ya verilmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Karar\u0131n daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istinaf edilmesi \u00fczerine, B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince ba\u015fvurunun k\u0131smen kabul\u00fc ile \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi h\u00fckm\u00fc kald\u0131r\u0131larak yeniden esas hakk\u0131nda h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmak suretiyle davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne, daval\u0131n\u0131n itiraz\u0131n iptaline, takibin kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 yerden devam\u0131na, icra takibine konu 101.527,20 TL as\u0131l alaca\u011f\u0131n % 20’si oran\u0131nda icra inkar tazminat\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131dan al\u0131narak davac\u0131ya verilmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir. B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131 taraf vekillerince temyiz edilmekle; kesinlik, s\u00fcre, temyiz \u015fart\u0131 ve di\u011fer usul eksiklikleri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yap\u0131lan \u00f6n inceleme sonucunda, temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin kabul\u00fcne karar verildikten ve Tetkik H\u00e2kimi taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan rapor dinlendikten sonra dosyadaki belgeler incelenip gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: I. DAVA Davac\u0131 y\u00fcklenici vekili dava dilek\u00e7esinde; daval\u0131 ile aras\u0131nda akdedilen 07\/06\/2012 tarihli hizmet s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi gere\u011fince Ak\u015fehir, Bey\u015fehir, …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-95510","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n