\u0130tiraz Konusu Kurallar<\/p>\n
\u0130tiraz konusu ilk kuralda; avukatl\u0131k onuruna, d\u00fczen ve gelenekleri ile meslek kurallar\u0131na uymayan eylem ve davran\u0131\u015flarda bulunanlarla mesleki \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmada g\u00f6revlerini yapmayan veya g\u00f6revinin gerektirdi\u011fi d\u00fcr\u00fcstl\u00fc\u011fe uygun \u015fekilde davranmayanlar hakk\u0131nda 1136 say\u0131l\u0131 Avukatl\u0131k Kanunu\u2019nda yaz\u0131l\u0131 disiplin cezalar\u0131n\u0131n uygulanaca\u011f\u0131 d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. \u0130kinci kuralda ise avukatlar hakk\u0131nda uygulanacak disiplin cezalar\u0131 say\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve bu cezalar\u0131n tan\u0131mlar\u0131na yer verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvuru Gerek\u00e7esi<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvuru karar\u0131nda \u00f6zetle; itiraz konusu kurallarda disiplin uygulamalar\u0131yla ilgili olarak herhangi bir ilkenin belirlenmedi\u011fi, hangi disiplin fiillerine ne t\u00fcr cezalar\u0131n uygulanaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fczenlenmedi\u011fi, idareye an\u0131lan cezalar\u0131n uygulanmas\u0131 konusunda s\u0131n\u0131rs\u0131z bir takdir yetkisinin tan\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu itibarla ayn\u0131 fiil nedeniyle en hafif cezan\u0131n uygulanabilece\u011fi gibi en a\u011f\u0131r cezan\u0131n da uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcmk\u00fcn oldu\u011fu, bu h\u00e2liyle disiplin su\u00e7 ve cezalar\u0131 konusunda kanuni g\u00fcvencenin sa\u011flanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bireylerin hangi somut fiil ve olguya hangi hukuki yapt\u0131r\u0131m\u0131n veya sonucun ba\u011fland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirli bir a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131k ve kesinlikte \u00f6ng\u00f6rebilmelerine yasal \u00e7er\u00e7evede imk\u00e2n tan\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu itibarla su\u00e7ta ve cezada kanunilik ilkesinin ihlal edildi\u011fi belirtilerek kurallar\u0131n Anayasa\u2019ya ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
Mahkemenin De\u011ferlendirmesi<\/p>\n
Anayasa Mahkemesi 22\/9\/2021 tarihli ve E.2021\/16, K.2021\/62 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda 6643 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Eczac\u0131lar\u0131 Birli\u011fi Kanunu\u2019nun eczac\u0131 odalar\u0131 haysiyet divan\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6rev ve yetkilerini d\u00fczenleyen 30. maddesinin meslek mensuplar\u0131 hakk\u0131nda disiplin cezas\u0131 verme yetkisini d\u00fczenleyen k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131 incelemi\u015f ve s\u00f6z konusu k\u0131sm\u0131 bireylerin hangi somut fiil ve olguya hangi hukuksal yapt\u0131r\u0131m\u0131n veya sonucun ba\u011fland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirli bir a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131k ve kesinlikte \u00f6ng\u00f6rebilmelerine yasal \u00e7er\u00e7evede imk\u00e2n tan\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle Anayasa\u2019ya ayk\u0131r\u0131 bularak iptal etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Kararda 30. maddenin s\u00f6z konusu k\u0131sm\u0131nda eczac\u0131lar hakk\u0131nda uygulanabilecek disiplin cezalar\u0131 say\u0131lmakla birlikte an\u0131lan maddenin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n birinci c\u00fcmlesinde say\u0131lan h\u00e2llerde hangi disiplin cezas\u0131n\u0131n uygulanaca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin bir d\u00fczenlemenin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespit edilmi\u015ftir. Bu kapsamda, an\u0131lan k\u0131s\u0131mda eczac\u0131lar hakk\u0131nda disiplin cezas\u0131 uygulanabilecek h\u00e2llerin say\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve disiplin cezalar\u0131n\u0131n da g\u00f6sterildi\u011fi bununla birlikte maddede say\u0131lan disiplin su\u00e7 ve cezalar\u0131 aras\u0131nda yeterli ba\u011flant\u0131n\u0131n kurulamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir. Bu \u00e7er\u00e7evede, disiplin cezas\u0131n\u0131 gerektiren eylemin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi durumunda fiil ve hareketin niteli\u011fine g\u00f6re disiplin cezalar\u0131n\u0131n verilebilece\u011fi \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmekle birlikte bu \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fct\u00fcn disiplin cezas\u0131n\u0131n muhataplar\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan yeterli bir hukuki g\u00fcvence sa\u011flamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifade edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
\u00d6te yandan kararda disiplin cezas\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesi konusunda haysiyet divan\u0131na s\u0131n\u0131rs\u0131z bir takdir yetkisinin tan\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 dile getirilmi\u015ftir. Bu ba\u011flamda haysiyet divan\u0131na disiplin cezas\u0131n\u0131 gerektiren eylemin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi durumunda ilgili k\u0131s\u0131mda yer alan disiplin cezalar\u0131ndan istedi\u011fini uygulayabilme imk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131n tan\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilerek haysiyet divan\u0131n\u0131n bu yapt\u0131r\u0131m\u0131 uygularken an\u0131lan Kanun\u2019da \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen s\u0131ray\u0131 g\u00f6zetme zorunlulu\u011funa da tabi tutulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifade edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
S\u00f6z konusu kararda Anayasa Mahkemesi, i\u015flenen disiplinsizlik eylemi ile tayin edilen disiplin cezas\u0131 aras\u0131nda adil bir dengenin g\u00f6zetilmesini temin edecek gerekli ve yeterli mekanizmalar\u0131n kurulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, verilecek disiplin cezalar\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan keyf\u00ee yorum ve uygulamalara kar\u015f\u0131 hukuki g\u00fcvencenin sa\u011flanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna varm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Anayasa Mahkemesi bu yakla\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 6235 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk M\u00fchendis ve Mimar Odalar\u0131 Birli\u011fi Kanunu, 6343 say\u0131l\u0131 Veteriner Hekimli\u011fi Mesle\u011finin \u0130cras\u0131na, T\u00fcrk Veteriner Hekimleri Birli\u011fi ile Odalar\u0131n\u0131n Te\u015fekk\u00fcl Tarz\u0131na ve G\u00f6rece\u011fi \u0130\u015flere Dair Kanun ile 1512 say\u0131l\u0131 Noterlik Kanunu\u2019nun benzer d\u00fczenlemeler i\u00e7eren h\u00fck\u00fcmlerini inceledi\u011fi kararlar\u0131nda da s\u00fcrd\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr (AYM, E.2023\/53, K.2023\/49; E.2023\/18, K.2023\/57; E.2024\/185, K.2024\/178).<\/p>\n
\u0130tiraz konusu kurallar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan da Anayasa Mahkemesinin an\u0131lan kararlar\u0131ndan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektirir bir durum bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Anayasa Mahkemesi a\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle kurallar\u0131n Anayasa\u2019ya ayk\u0131r\u0131 olduklar\u0131na ve iptallerine karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
\u0130ptal karar\u0131nda, Avukatl\u0131k Kanununun “Disiplin Cezalar\u0131n\u0131n uygulanaca\u011f\u0131 haller” ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 134. ve “Disiplin cezalar\u0131” ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 135. maddelerinin Mahkemenin 22\/9\/2021 tarih ve E. 2021\/16 K. 2021\/62 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131ndaki 6643 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Eczac\u0131lar\u0131 Birli\u011fi Kanununun 30. maddesinin disiplin kurallar\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fczenleyen k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n iptalinde dayan\u0131lan ve Anayasan\u0131n 2. maddesine ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k nedeniyle iptal karar\u0131 verildi\u011fi belirtildi.<\/p>\n
\u0130ptal karar\u0131 9 ay sonra y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girecek.<\/p>\n
Anayasa Mahkemesi’nin 6\/3\/2025 tarihli, 2025\/50 esas – 2025\/47 karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 KARARI<\/p>\n
Esas Say\u0131s\u0131 : 2025\/50<\/p>\n
Karar Say\u0131s\u0131 : 2025\/47<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi : 6\/3\/2025<\/p>\n
R.G.Tarih-Say\u0131 : 22\/5\/2025-32907<\/p>\n
\u0130T\u0130RAZ YOLUNA BA\u015eVURAN: Ankara 20. \u0130dare Mahkemesi<\/p>\n
\u0130T\u0130RAZIN KONUSU: 19\/3\/1969 tarihli ve 1136 say\u0131l\u0131 Avukatl\u0131k Kanunu\u2019nun;<\/p>\n
A. 2\/5\/2001 tarihli ve 4667 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 65. maddesiyle de\u011fi\u015ftirilen 134. maddesinin,<\/p>\n
B. 135. maddesinin,<\/p>\n
Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 2., 13. ve 38. maddelerine ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclerek iptallerine karar verilmesi talebidir.<\/p>\n
OLAY: K\u0131nama cezas\u0131 verilmesine ili\u015fkin i\u015flemin iptali talebiyle a\u00e7\u0131lan davada itiraz konusu kurallar\u0131n Anayasa\u2019ya ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu kan\u0131s\u0131na varan Mahkeme, iptalleri i\u00e7in ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
I. \u0130PTAL\u0130 \u0130STENEN KANUN H\u00dcK\u00dcMLER\u0130<\/p>\n
Kanun\u2019un itiraz konusu;<\/p>\n
1. 134. maddesi \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
\u201cDisiplin Cezalar\u0131n\u0131n uygulanaca\u011f\u0131 haller:<\/p>\n
Madde 134 \u2013 (De\u011fi\u015fik: 2\/5\/2001 – 4667\/65 md.) Avukatl\u0131k onuruna, d\u00fczen ve gelenekleri ile meslek kurallar\u0131na uymayan eylem ve davran\u0131\u015flarda bulunanlarla, meslek\u00ee \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmada g\u00f6revlerini yapmayan veya g\u00f6revinin gerektirdi\u011fi d\u00fcr\u00fcstl\u00fc\u011fe uygun \u015fekilde davranmayanlar hakk\u0131nda bu Kanunda yaz\u0131l\u0131 disiplin cezalar\u0131 uygulan\u0131r.\u201d<\/p>\n
2. 135. maddesi \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
\u201cDisiplin cezalar\u0131:<\/p>\n
Madde 135 \u2013 Disiplin cezalar\u0131 \u015funlard\u0131r:<\/p>\n
1. (De\u011fi\u015fik: 22\/1\/1986 – 3256\/23 md.) Uyarma; avukat\u0131n mesle\u011finin icras\u0131nda daha dikkatli davranmas\u0131 gerekti\u011finin kendisine bildirilmesidir.<\/p>\n
2. K\u0131nama; meslekinde ve davran\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kusurlu say\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n avukata bildirilmesidir.<\/p>\n
3. (De\u011fi\u015fik: 22\/1\/1986 – 3256\/23 md.) Onbin liradan y\u00fczellibin liraya kadar para cezas\u0131.<\/p>\n
4. (De\u011fi\u015fik: 2\/5\/2001 – 4667\/66 md.) \u0130\u015ften \u00e7\u0131karma, avukat\u0131n veya avukatl\u0131k ortakl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n \u00fc\u00e7 aydan az ve \u00fc\u00e7 y\u0131ldan fazla olmamak \u00fczere meslek\u00ee faaliyetlerinin yasaklanmas\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
5. Meslekten \u00e7\u0131karma; avukatl\u0131k ruhsatnamesinin geri al\u0131narak avukat\u0131n ad\u0131n\u0131n baro levhas\u0131ndan silinmesi ve avukatl\u0131k unvan\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131d\u0131r. (Ek c\u00fcmle: 2\/5\/2001 – 4667\/66 md.) Avukatl\u0131k ortakl\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in de baro avukatl\u0131k ortakl\u0131\u011f\u0131 sicilinden silinmesidir.\u201d<\/p>\n
II. \u0130LK \u0130NCELEME<\/p>\n
1. Anayasa Mahkemesi \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uyar\u0131nca Kadir \u00d6ZKAYA, Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN, Basri BA\u011eCI, Engin YILDIRIM, R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7, Recai AKYEL, Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ, Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU, Selahaddin MENTE\u015e, \u0130rfan F\u0130DAN, Kenan YA\u015eAR, Muhterem \u0130NCE, Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L, \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR ve Metin KIRATLI\u2019n\u0131n kat\u0131l\u0131mlar\u0131yla 6\/3\/2025 tarihinde yap\u0131lan ilk inceleme toplant\u0131s\u0131nda dosyada eksiklik bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan i\u015fin esas\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesine OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
III. ESASIN \u0130NCELENMES\u0130<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvuru karar\u0131 ve ekleri, Raport\u00f6r Fatih TORUN taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan i\u015fin esas\u0131na ili\u015fkin rapor, itiraz konusu kanun h\u00fck\u00fcmleri, dayan\u0131lan Anayasa kurallar\u0131 ve bunlar\u0131n gerek\u00e7eleri ile di\u011fer yasama belgeleri okunup incelendikten sonra gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n
A. \u0130tiraz\u0131n Gerek\u00e7esi<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fvuru karar\u0131nda \u00f6zetle; itiraz konusu kurallarda disiplin uygulamalar\u0131yla ilgili olarak herhangi bir ilkenin belirlenmedi\u011fi, hangi disiplin fiillerine ne t\u00fcr cezalar\u0131n uygulanaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fczenlenmedi\u011fi, idareye an\u0131lan cezalar\u0131n uygulanmas\u0131 konusunda s\u0131n\u0131rs\u0131z bir takdir yetkisinin tan\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu itibarla ayn\u0131 fiil nedeniyle en hafif cezan\u0131n uygulanabilece\u011fi gibi en a\u011f\u0131r cezan\u0131n da uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcmk\u00fcn oldu\u011fu, bu h\u00e2liyle disiplin su\u00e7 ve cezalar\u0131 konusunda kanuni g\u00fcvencenin sa\u011flanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bireylerin hangi somut fiil ve olguya hangi hukuki yapt\u0131r\u0131m\u0131n veya sonucun ba\u011fland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirli bir a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131k ve kesinlikte \u00f6ng\u00f6rebilmelerine yasal \u00e7er\u00e7evede imk\u00e2n tan\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu itibarla su\u00e7ta ve cezada kanunilik ilkesinin ihlal edildi\u011fi belirtilerek kurallar\u0131n Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 2., 13. ve 38. maddelerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
B. Anayasa\u2019ya Ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k Sorunu<\/p>\n
4. 1136 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un itiraz konusu 134. maddesinde avukatl\u0131k onuruna, d\u00fczen ve gelenekleri ile meslek kurallar\u0131na uymayan eylem ve davran\u0131\u015flarda bulunanlarla mesleki \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmada g\u00f6revlerini yapmayan veya g\u00f6revinin gerektirdi\u011fi d\u00fcr\u00fcstl\u00fc\u011fe uygun \u015fekilde davranmayanlar hakk\u0131nda bu Kanun\u2019da yaz\u0131l\u0131 disiplin cezalar\u0131n\u0131n uygulanaca\u011f\u0131 d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Kanun\u2019un itiraz konusu 135. maddesinde ise avukatlar hakk\u0131nda uygulanacak disiplin cezalar\u0131n\u0131n uyarma, k\u0131nama, on bin liradan y\u00fcz elli bin liraya kadar para cezas\u0131, i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131karma ve meslekten \u00e7\u0131karma (avukatl\u0131k ortakl\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in baro avukatl\u0131k ortakl\u0131\u011f\u0131 sicilinden silinme) oldu\u011fu h\u00fckme ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015f olup bunlar\u0131n tan\u0131mlar\u0131na yer verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. Anayasa Mahkemesi 22\/9\/2021 tarihli ve E.2021\/16, K.2021\/62 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda 25\/1\/1956 tarihli ve 6643 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Eczac\u0131lar\u0131 Birli\u011fi Kanunu\u2019nun eczac\u0131 odalar\u0131 haysiyet divan\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6rev ve yetkilerini d\u00fczenleyen 30. maddesinin meslek mensuplar\u0131 hakk\u0131nda disiplin cezas\u0131 verme yetkisini d\u00fczenleyen k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131 incelemi\u015f ve s\u00f6z konusu k\u0131sm\u0131, eczac\u0131 odalar\u0131 haysiyet divan\u0131n\u0131n meslek mensuplar\u0131 hakk\u0131nda disiplin cezas\u0131 uygulama yetkisini kullanmalar\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda bireylerin hangi somut fiil ve olguya hangi hukuksal yapt\u0131r\u0131m\u0131n veya sonucun ba\u011fland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirli bir a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131k ve kesinlikte \u00f6ng\u00f6rebilmelerine yasal \u00e7er\u00e7evede imk\u00e2n tan\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 2. maddesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 bularak iptal etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. An\u0131lan kararda ilk olarak 30. maddenin s\u00f6z konusu k\u0131sm\u0131nda eczac\u0131lar hakk\u0131nda uygulanabilecek disiplin cezalar\u0131 say\u0131lmakla birlikte an\u0131lan maddenin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n birinci c\u00fcmlesinde say\u0131lan h\u00e2llerde hangi disiplin cezas\u0131n\u0131n uygulanaca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin bir d\u00fczenlemenin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespit edilmi\u015ftir (AYM, E.2021\/16, K.2021\/62, 22\/9\/2021, \u00a7 17).<\/p>\n
8. Bu kapsamda an\u0131lan k\u0131s\u0131mda eczac\u0131lar hakk\u0131nda disiplin cezas\u0131 uygulanabilecek h\u00e2ller say\u0131lmakla ve disiplin cezalar\u0131 da g\u00f6sterilmekle birlikte maddede say\u0131lan disiplin su\u00e7 ve cezalar\u0131 aras\u0131nda yeterli ba\u011flant\u0131n\u0131n kurulamad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu \u00e7er\u00e7evede disiplin cezas\u0131n\u0131 gerektiren eylemin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi durumunda fiil ve hareketin niteli\u011fine g\u00f6re disiplin cezalar\u0131n\u0131n verilebilece\u011fi \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmekle birlikte bu \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fct\u00fcn disiplin cezas\u0131n\u0131n muhataplar\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan yeterli bir hukuki g\u00fcvence sa\u011flamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir (AYM, E.2021\/16, K.2021\/62, 22\/9\/2021, \u00a7 18).<\/p>\n
9. \u00d6te yandan disiplin cezas\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesi konusunda haysiyet divan\u0131na s\u0131n\u0131rs\u0131z bir takdir yetkisinin tan\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu ba\u011flamda haysiyet divan\u0131na, disiplin cezas\u0131n\u0131 gerektiren eylemin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi durumunda ilgili k\u0131s\u0131mda yer alan disiplin cezalar\u0131ndan istedi\u011fini uygulayabilme imk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131n tan\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131, haysiyet divan\u0131n\u0131n bu yapt\u0131r\u0131m\u0131 uygularken an\u0131lan Kanun\u2019da \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen s\u0131ray\u0131 g\u00f6zetme zorunlulu\u011funa da tabi tutulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifade edilmi\u015ftir (AYM, E.2021\/16, K.2021\/62, 22\/9\/2021, \u00a7 19).<\/p>\n
10. S\u00f6z konusu kararda Anayasa Mahkemesi; haysiyet divan\u0131na tan\u0131nan yetkinin somut olay\u0131n \u00f6zelliklerine, eylemin a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131na, olu\u015fan zarar\u0131n b\u00fcy\u00fckl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne g\u00f6re kamu yarar\u0131 ve hizmet gereklerine uygun olarak kullan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flaman\u0131n yan\u0131nda i\u015flenen disiplinsizlik eylemi ile tayin edilen disiplin cezas\u0131 aras\u0131nda adil bir dengenin g\u00f6zetilmesini temin edecek gerekli ve yeterli mekanizmalar\u0131n kurulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, verilecek disiplin cezalar\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan keyf\u00ee yorum ve uygulamalara kar\u015f\u0131 hukuki g\u00fcvencenin sa\u011flanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna varm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (AYM, E.2021\/16, K.2021\/62, 22\/9\/2021, \u00a7 20).<\/p>\n
11. Anayasa Mahkemesi bu yakla\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 27\/1\/1954 tarihli ve 6235 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk M\u00fchendis ve Mimar Odalar\u0131 Birli\u011fi Kanunu, 9\/3\/1954 tarihli ve 6343 say\u0131l\u0131 Veteriner Hekimli\u011fi Mesle\u011finin \u0130cras\u0131na, T\u00fcrk Veteriner Hekimleri Birli\u011fi ile Odalar\u0131n\u0131n Te\u015fekk\u00fcl Tarz\u0131na ve G\u00f6rece\u011fi \u0130\u015flere Dair Kanun ile 18\/1\/1972 tarihli ve 1512 say\u0131l\u0131 Noterlik Kanunu\u2019nun benzer d\u00fczenlemeler i\u00e7eren h\u00fck\u00fcmlerini inceledi\u011fi kararlar\u0131nda da s\u00fcrd\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr (AYM, E.2023\/53, K.2023\/49, 22\/03\/2023, \u00a7\u00a7 4-12; E.2023\/18, K.2023\/57, 22\/03\/2023, \u00a7\u00a7 4-12; E.2024\/185, K.2024\/178, 05\/11\/2024, \u00a7\u00a7 4-11).<\/p>\n
12. \u0130tiraz konusu kurallar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan da Anayasa Mahkemesinin an\u0131lan kararlar\u0131ndan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektirir bir durum bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
13. A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle kurallar Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 2. maddesine ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r. \u0130ptalleri gerekir.<\/p>\n
Kurallar, Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 2. maddesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclerek iptal edildi\u011finden ayr\u0131ca Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 13. ve 38. maddeleri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden incelenmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
IV. \u0130PTAL KARARININ Y\u00dcR\u00dcRL\u00dc\u011eE G\u0130RECE\u011e\u0130 G\u00dcN SORUNU<\/p>\n
14. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 153. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda \u201dKanun, Cumhurba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 kararnamesi veya T\u00fcrkiye B\u00fcy\u00fck Millet Meclisi \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ya da bunlar\u0131n h\u00fck\u00fcmleri, iptal kararlar\u0131n\u0131n Resm\u00ee Gazetede yay\u0131mland\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihte y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckten kalkar. Gereken hallerde Anayasa Mahkemesi iptal h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girece\u011fi tarihi ayr\u0131ca kararla\u015ft\u0131rabilir. Bu tarih, karar\u0131n Resm\u00ee Gazetede yay\u0131mland\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00fcnden ba\u015flayarak bir y\u0131l\u0131 ge\u00e7emez.\u201d denilmekte, 30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun\u2019un 66. maddesinin (3) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda da bu kural tekrarlanarak mahkemenin gerekli g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc h\u00e2llerde Resm\u00ee Gazete\u2019de yay\u0131mland\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00fcnden ba\u015flayarak iptal karar\u0131n\u0131n y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girece\u011fi tarihi bir y\u0131l\u0131 ge\u00e7memek \u00fczere ayr\u0131ca kararla\u015ft\u0131rabilece\u011fi belirtilmektedir.<\/p>\n
15. 1136 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 134. ve 135. maddelerinin iptalleri nedeniyle do\u011facak hukuksal bo\u015fluk kamu yarar\u0131n\u0131 ihlal edecek nitelikte g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 153. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131yla 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 66. maddesinin (3) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fince iptal h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin karar\u0131n Resm\u00ee Gazete\u2019de yay\u0131mlanmas\u0131ndan ba\u015flayarak dokuz ay sonra y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmesi uygun g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
V. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
19\/3\/1969 tarihli ve 1136 say\u0131l\u0131 Avukatl\u0131k Kanunu\u2019nun;<\/p>\n
A. 2\/5\/2001 tarihli ve 4667 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 65. maddesiyle de\u011fi\u015ftirilen 134. maddesinin,<\/p>\n
B. 135. maddesinin,<\/p>\n
Anayasa\u2019ya ayk\u0131r\u0131 olduklar\u0131na ve \u0130PTALLER\u0130NE, iptal h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 153. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131 ile 30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun\u2019un 66. maddesinin (3) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fince KARARIN RESM\u00ce GAZETE\u2019DE YAYIMLANMASINDAN BA\u015eLAYARAK DOKUZ AY SONRA Y\u00dcR\u00dcRL\u00dc\u011eE G\u0130RMES\u0130NE 6\/3\/2025 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
Kadir \u00d6ZKAYA<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkanvekili<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkanvekili<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Recai AKYEL<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Selahaddin MENTE\u015e<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
\u0130rfan F\u0130DAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Muhterem \u0130NCE<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Metin KIRATLI<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi 6\/3\/2025 tarihinde E.2025\/50 numaral\u0131 dosyada, 1136 say\u0131l\u0131 Avukatl\u0131k Kanunu\u2019nun 4667 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 65. maddesiyle de\u011fi\u015ftirilen 134. maddesinin ve 135. maddesinin Anayasa\u2019ya ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funa ve iptaline, iptal h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin karar\u0131n Resm\u00ee Gazete\u2019de yay\u0131mlanmas\u0131ndan ba\u015flayarak dokuz ay sonra y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmesine karar vermi\u015ftir.\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\u0130tiraz Konusu Kurallar \u0130tiraz konusu ilk kuralda; avukatl\u0131k onuruna, d\u00fczen ve gelenekleri ile meslek kurallar\u0131na uymayan eylem ve davran\u0131\u015flarda bulunanlarla mesleki \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmada g\u00f6revlerini yapmayan veya g\u00f6revinin gerektirdi\u011fi d\u00fcr\u00fcstl\u00fc\u011fe uygun \u015fekilde davranmayanlar hakk\u0131nda 1136 say\u0131l\u0131 Avukatl\u0131k Kanunu\u2019nda yaz\u0131l\u0131 disiplin cezalar\u0131n\u0131n uygulanaca\u011f\u0131 d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. \u0130kinci kuralda ise avukatlar hakk\u0131nda uygulanacak disiplin cezalar\u0131 say\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve bu cezalar\u0131n tan\u0131mlar\u0131na yer verilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvuru Gerek\u00e7esi Ba\u015fvuru karar\u0131nda \u00f6zetle; itiraz konusu kurallarda disiplin uygulamalar\u0131yla ilgili olarak herhangi bir ilkenin belirlenmedi\u011fi, hangi disiplin fiillerine ne t\u00fcr cezalar\u0131n uygulanaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fczenlenmedi\u011fi, idareye an\u0131lan cezalar\u0131n uygulanmas\u0131 konusunda s\u0131n\u0131rs\u0131z bir takdir yetkisinin tan\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu itibarla ayn\u0131 fiil nedeniyle en hafif cezan\u0131n uygulanabilece\u011fi gibi en a\u011f\u0131r cezan\u0131n da uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcmk\u00fcn oldu\u011fu, bu h\u00e2liyle disiplin su\u00e7 ve cezalar\u0131 konusunda kanuni g\u00fcvencenin sa\u011flanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bireylerin hangi somut fiil ve olguya hangi hukuki yapt\u0131r\u0131m\u0131n veya sonucun ba\u011fland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirli bir a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131k ve kesinlikte \u00f6ng\u00f6rebilmelerine yasal \u00e7er\u00e7evede imk\u00e2n tan\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu itibarla su\u00e7ta ve cezada kanunilik ilkesinin ihlal edildi\u011fi belirtilerek kurallar\u0131n Anayasa\u2019ya ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Mahkemenin De\u011ferlendirmesi Anayasa Mahkemesi 22\/9\/2021 tarihli ve E.2021\/16, K.2021\/62 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda 6643 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Eczac\u0131lar\u0131 Birli\u011fi Kanunu\u2019nun eczac\u0131 odalar\u0131 haysiyet divan\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6rev ve yetkilerini d\u00fczenleyen 30. maddesinin meslek mensuplar\u0131 hakk\u0131nda disiplin cezas\u0131 verme yetkisini d\u00fczenleyen k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131 incelemi\u015f ve s\u00f6z konusu k\u0131sm\u0131 bireylerin hangi somut fiil …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-94026","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n