{"id":87235,"date":"2025-05-15T12:13:00","date_gmt":"2025-05-15T09:13:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uncategorized-tr\/aymnin-2020-6458-basvuru-numarali-karari\/"},"modified":"2025-05-15T12:13:00","modified_gmt":"2025-05-15T09:13:00","slug":"aymnin-2020-6458-basvuru-numarali-karari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-6458-basvuru-numarali-karari\/","title":{"rendered":"AYM&#8217;nin 2020\/6458 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n<p>   ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n<p>   \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n<p>   KARAR<\/p>\n<p>   F.S. BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n<p>   (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/6458)<\/p>\n<p>   Karar Tarihi: 11\/12\/2024<\/p>\n<p>   \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n<p>   KARAR<\/p>\n<p>   Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n<p>   :<\/p>\n<p>   Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n<p>   \u00dcyeler<\/p>\n<p>   :<\/p>\n<p>   Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n<p>   Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n<p>   \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n<p>   Metin KIRATLI<\/p>\n<p>   Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n<p>   :<\/p>\n<p>   Saliha AKSOY<\/p>\n<p>   Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n<p>   :<\/p>\n<p>I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n<p>1. Ba\u015fvuru, k\u0131ymet takdirine itiraz davas\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcre a\u015f\u0131m\u0131ndan reddedilmesi nedeniyle mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p>2. Ba\u015fvurucu aleyhine Adana 7. \u0130cra M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde ba\u015flat\u0131lan icra takibi sonucu ad\u0131na kay\u0131tl\u0131 ara\u00e7 haczedilerek muhafaza alt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f ve haciz kapsam\u0131nda arac\u0131n k\u0131ymet takdiri yap\u0131larak 8\/8\/2019 tarihli raporla bedeli 34.000 TL olarak belirlenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>3. Ba\u015fvurucu, haczedilen arac\u0131n ger\u00e7ek de\u011ferinin 50.000 TL oldu\u011funu belirterek 6\/9\/2019 tarihinde Adana 7. \u0130cra Hukuk Mahkemesinde (Mahkeme) k\u0131ymet takdirine itiraz davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>4. Mahkeme 13\/9\/2019 tarihli karar\u0131yla davan\u0131n hak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc s\u00fcre nedeniyle reddine h\u00fckmetmi\u015ftir. Mahkeme gerek\u00e7esinde k\u0131ymet takdir raporunun ba\u015fvurucuya 3\/8\/2019 tarihinde tebli\u011f edildi\u011fini ancak ba\u015fvurucunun 9\/6\/1932 tarihli ve 2004 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130cra ve \u0130flas Kanunu&#8217;nun 128\/a maddesinde belirtilen yedi g\u00fcnl\u00fck hak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc s\u00fcre sona erdikten sonra 6\/9\/2019 havale tarihli dilek\u00e7eyle dava a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015ftir. Karar, istinaf kanun yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere verilmi\u015f, ba\u015fvurucu taraf\u0131ndan istinaf kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p>5. Ba\u015fvurucunun istinaf talebi \u00fczerine mahkeme 10\/10\/2019 tarihli ek karar\u0131yla her ne kadar 13\/9\/2019 tarihli h\u00fckm\u00fcn istinaf kanun yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere verildi\u011fi belirtilmi\u015fse de 2004 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 128\/a maddesi uyar\u0131nca karar\u0131n kesin olmak \u00fczere verilmesi gerekirken sehven istinaf kanun yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere verildi\u011fini belirterek istinaf talebini reddetmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>6. Ba\u015fvurucu, an\u0131lan ek karara kar\u015f\u0131 istinaf talebinde bulunmu\u015f, Adana B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 10. Hukuk Dairesinin (B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi) 24\/12\/2019 tarihli karar\u0131yla k\u0131ymet takdirine ili\u015fkin davada verilen karar\u0131n kesin nitelikte oldu\u011fu belirtilerek istinaf talebi reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>7. Ba\u015fvurucu, nihai h\u00fckm\u00fc 3\/2\/2020 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra 5\/2\/2020 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p>8. Ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n<p>9. Ba\u015fvurucu; dava konusu k\u0131ymet takdiri raporunun kendisine 3\/9\/2019 tarihinde tebli\u011f edildi\u011fini ancak posta memuru taraf\u0131ndan tebligat par\u00e7as\u0131 \u00fczerine tebli\u011f tarihinin sehven 3\/8\/2019 yaz\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu durumun tebligat sorgulamada da g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, s\u00fcresinde dava a\u00e7mas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131n sehven yaz\u0131lan tebli\u011f tarihi esas al\u0131narak hak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc s\u00fcre nedeniyle davan\u0131n reddedildi\u011fini belirterek mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p>10. 30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun&#8217;un 47. maddesinin (5) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 ile Anayasa Mahkemesi \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc&#8217;n\u00fcn 64. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fi bireysel ba\u015fvurunun, ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketildi\u011fi tarihten, ba\u015fvuru yolu \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f ise ihlalin \u00f6\u011frenildi\u011fi tarihten itibaren otuz g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekir.<\/p>\n<p>11. Ba\u015fvuru konusu uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k k\u0131ymet takdiri \u015fik\u00e2yetine ili\u015fkindir. 2004 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 128\/a maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda k\u0131ymet takdirinin tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi ilgililerin, raporun tebli\u011finden itibaren yedi g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde raporu d\u00fczenleten icra dairesinin bulundu\u011fu yerdeki icra mahkemesinde \u015fik\u00e2yette bulunabilecekleri; ayn\u0131 maddenin (5) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda ise madde gere\u011fince icra mahkemesinin verdi\u011fi kararlar\u0131n kesin oldu\u011fu d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>12. Somut olayda mahkemenin 13\/9\/2019 tarihli h\u00fckm\u00fc istinaf kanun yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere verilmi\u015ftir. Bu kapsamda ba\u015fvurucu istinaf talebinde bulunmu\u015f, mahkeme 10\/10\/2019 tarihli ek karar\u0131yla h\u00fckm\u00fcn kesin olmak \u00fczere verilmesi gerekirken sehven istinaf kanun yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere verildi\u011fini belirterek istinaf talebini reddetmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu an\u0131lan ek karara kar\u015f\u0131 istinaf talebinde bulunmu\u015f ancak B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131n kesin oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle talebi esastan reddetmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>13. Bu durumda mahkeme verdi\u011fi ilk kararda istinaf kanun yolunun a\u00e7\u0131k oldu\u011funu belirterek ba\u015fvurucuyu yan\u0131ltm\u0131\u015f gibi g\u00f6z\u00fckse de 10\/10\/2019 tarihli ek karar\u0131yla h\u00fckm\u00fcn kesin oldu\u011funu ba\u015fvurucuya bildirmi\u015ftir. Netice olarak sehven yaz\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilen ifadenin ek kararla d\u00fczeltilmesinden itibaren art\u0131k bir kanun yolunda yan\u0131ltmadan s\u00f6z edilemeyece\u011fi, ba\u015fvurucunun da en ge\u00e7 10\/10\/2019 tarihli an\u0131lan ek kararla h\u00fckm\u00fcn kesinle\u015fti\u011finden haberdar oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu nedenle 2004 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un yukar\u0131da yer verilen k\u0131ymet takdirine ili\u015fkin \u015fik\u00e2yetlerde icra mahkemesinin verdi\u011fi kararlar\u0131n kesin oldu\u011funa dair a\u00e7\u0131k h\u00fckm\u00fc de dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun nihai h\u00fckme kar\u015f\u0131 ikinci defa istinaf kanun yoluna gitmek yerine ek karar\u0131 \u00f6\u011frendi\u011fi tarihten itibaren s\u00fcresinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>14. Sonu\u00e7 olarak mahkemenin 10\/10\/2019 tarihli ek karar\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvurucuya 23\/10\/2019 tarihinde tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi, en ge\u00e7 bu tarihten itibaren nihai h\u00fck\u00fcmden haberdar olan ba\u015fvurucunun otuz g\u00fcnl\u00fck bireysel ba\u015fvuru s\u00fcresi ge\u00e7irildikten sonra 5\/2\/2020 tarihinde yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ba\u015fvurunun s\u00fcre a\u015f\u0131m\u0131 nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n<p>III. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n<p>A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n<p>A. Ba\u015fvurunun s\u00fcre a\u015f\u0131m\u0131 nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n<p>B. Yarg\u0131lama giderlerinin ba\u015fvurucu \u00fczerinde BIRAKILMASINA 11\/12\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p>\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi&#8217;nin 11\/12\/2024 tarihli ve 2020\/6458 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n<p>Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR F.S. BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/6458) Karar Tarihi: 11\/12\/2024 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR Metin KIRATLI Raport\u00f6r : Saliha AKSOY Ba\u015fvurucu : I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, k\u0131ymet takdirine itiraz davas\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcre a\u015f\u0131m\u0131ndan reddedilmesi nedeniyle mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu aleyhine Adana 7. \u0130cra M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde ba\u015flat\u0131lan icra takibi sonucu ad\u0131na kay\u0131tl\u0131 ara\u00e7 haczedilerek muhafaza alt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f ve haciz kapsam\u0131nda arac\u0131n k\u0131ymet takdiri yap\u0131larak 8\/8\/2019 tarihli raporla bedeli 34.000 TL olarak belirlenmi\u015ftir. 3. Ba\u015fvurucu, haczedilen arac\u0131n ger\u00e7ek de\u011ferinin 50.000 TL oldu\u011funu belirterek 6\/9\/2019 tarihinde Adana 7. \u0130cra Hukuk Mahkemesinde (Mahkeme) k\u0131ymet takdirine itiraz davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 4. Mahkeme 13\/9\/2019 tarihli karar\u0131yla davan\u0131n hak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc s\u00fcre nedeniyle reddine h\u00fckmetmi\u015ftir. Mahkeme gerek\u00e7esinde k\u0131ymet takdir raporunun ba\u015fvurucuya 3\/8\/2019 tarihinde tebli\u011f edildi\u011fini ancak ba\u015fvurucunun 9\/6\/1932 tarihli ve 2004 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130cra ve \u0130flas Kanunu&#8217;nun 128\/a maddesinde belirtilen yedi g\u00fcnl\u00fck hak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc s\u00fcre sona erdikten sonra 6\/9\/2019 havale tarihli dilek\u00e7eyle dava a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015ftir. Karar, istinaf kanun yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere verilmi\u015f, ba\u015fvurucu taraf\u0131ndan istinaf kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurulmu\u015ftur. 5. Ba\u015fvurucunun istinaf talebi \u00fczerine mahkeme 10\/10\/2019 tarihli ek karar\u0131yla her ne kadar 13\/9\/2019 tarihli h\u00fckm\u00fcn istinaf kanun yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak &hellip;<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-87235","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.6 (Yoast SEO v27.1.1) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>AYM&#039;nin 2020\/6458 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-6458-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"uk_UA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"AYM&#039;nin 2020\/6458 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR F.S. BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/6458) Karar Tarihi: 11\/12\/2024 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR Metin KIRATLI Raport\u00f6r : Saliha AKSOY Ba\u015fvurucu : I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, k\u0131ymet takdirine itiraz davas\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcre a\u015f\u0131m\u0131ndan reddedilmesi nedeniyle mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu aleyhine Adana 7. \u0130cra M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde ba\u015flat\u0131lan icra takibi sonucu ad\u0131na kay\u0131tl\u0131 ara\u00e7 haczedilerek muhafaza alt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f ve haciz kapsam\u0131nda arac\u0131n k\u0131ymet takdiri yap\u0131larak 8\/8\/2019 tarihli raporla bedeli 34.000 TL olarak belirlenmi\u015ftir. 3. Ba\u015fvurucu, haczedilen arac\u0131n ger\u00e7ek de\u011ferinin 50.000 TL oldu\u011funu belirterek 6\/9\/2019 tarihinde Adana 7. \u0130cra Hukuk Mahkemesinde (Mahkeme) k\u0131ymet takdirine itiraz davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 4. Mahkeme 13\/9\/2019 tarihli karar\u0131yla davan\u0131n hak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc s\u00fcre nedeniyle reddine h\u00fckmetmi\u015ftir. Mahkeme gerek\u00e7esinde k\u0131ymet takdir raporunun ba\u015fvurucuya 3\/8\/2019 tarihinde tebli\u011f edildi\u011fini ancak ba\u015fvurucunun 9\/6\/1932 tarihli ve 2004 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130cra ve \u0130flas Kanunu&#8217;nun 128\/a maddesinde belirtilen yedi g\u00fcnl\u00fck hak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc s\u00fcre sona erdikten sonra 6\/9\/2019 havale tarihli dilek\u00e7eyle dava a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015ftir. Karar, istinaf kanun yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere verilmi\u015f, ba\u015fvurucu taraf\u0131ndan istinaf kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurulmu\u015ftur. 5. Ba\u015fvurucunun istinaf talebi \u00fczerine mahkeme 10\/10\/2019 tarihli ek karar\u0131yla her ne kadar 13\/9\/2019 tarihli h\u00fckm\u00fcn istinaf kanun yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak &hellip;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-6458-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-05-15T09:13:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u043e\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u0431\u043b. \u0447\u0430\u0441 \u0447\u0438\u0442\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 \u0445\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0438\u043d\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-6458-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-6458-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\"},\"headline\":\"AYM&#8217;nin 2020\/6458 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-05-15T09:13:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-6458-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\"},\"wordCount\":937,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Hukuki Haberler\"],\"inLanguage\":\"uk\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-6458-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-6458-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\",\"name\":\"AYM'nin 2020\/6458 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2025-05-15T09:13:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-6458-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"uk\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-6458-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-6458-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"AYM&#8217;nin 2020\/6458 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"description\":\"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"uk\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"uk\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"width\":1080,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\",\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"uk\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net\"],\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/author\/hukukihabernet\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"AYM'nin 2020\/6458 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-6458-basvuru-numarali-karari\/","og_locale":"uk_UA","og_type":"article","og_title":"AYM'nin 2020\/6458 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131","og_description":"T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR F.S. BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/6458) Karar Tarihi: 11\/12\/2024 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR Metin KIRATLI Raport\u00f6r : Saliha AKSOY Ba\u015fvurucu : I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, k\u0131ymet takdirine itiraz davas\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcre a\u015f\u0131m\u0131ndan reddedilmesi nedeniyle mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu aleyhine Adana 7. \u0130cra M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde ba\u015flat\u0131lan icra takibi sonucu ad\u0131na kay\u0131tl\u0131 ara\u00e7 haczedilerek muhafaza alt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f ve haciz kapsam\u0131nda arac\u0131n k\u0131ymet takdiri yap\u0131larak 8\/8\/2019 tarihli raporla bedeli 34.000 TL olarak belirlenmi\u015ftir. 3. Ba\u015fvurucu, haczedilen arac\u0131n ger\u00e7ek de\u011ferinin 50.000 TL oldu\u011funu belirterek 6\/9\/2019 tarihinde Adana 7. \u0130cra Hukuk Mahkemesinde (Mahkeme) k\u0131ymet takdirine itiraz davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 4. Mahkeme 13\/9\/2019 tarihli karar\u0131yla davan\u0131n hak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc s\u00fcre nedeniyle reddine h\u00fckmetmi\u015ftir. Mahkeme gerek\u00e7esinde k\u0131ymet takdir raporunun ba\u015fvurucuya 3\/8\/2019 tarihinde tebli\u011f edildi\u011fini ancak ba\u015fvurucunun 9\/6\/1932 tarihli ve 2004 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130cra ve \u0130flas Kanunu&#8217;nun 128\/a maddesinde belirtilen yedi g\u00fcnl\u00fck hak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc s\u00fcre sona erdikten sonra 6\/9\/2019 havale tarihli dilek\u00e7eyle dava a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015ftir. Karar, istinaf kanun yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere verilmi\u015f, ba\u015fvurucu taraf\u0131ndan istinaf kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurulmu\u015ftur. 5. Ba\u015fvurucunun istinaf talebi \u00fczerine mahkeme 10\/10\/2019 tarihli ek karar\u0131yla her ne kadar 13\/9\/2019 tarihli h\u00fckm\u00fcn istinaf kanun yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak &hellip;","og_url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-6458-basvuru-numarali-karari\/","og_site_name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","article_published_time":"2025-05-15T09:13:00+00:00","author":"Hukuki Haber.net","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u043e":"Hukuki Haber.net","\u041f\u0440\u0438\u0431\u043b. \u0447\u0430\u0441 \u0447\u0438\u0442\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044f":"5 \u0445\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0438\u043d"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-6458-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-6458-basvuru-numarali-karari\/"},"author":{"name":"Hukuki Haber.net","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822"},"headline":"AYM&#8217;nin 2020\/6458 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131","datePublished":"2025-05-15T09:13:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-6458-basvuru-numarali-karari\/"},"wordCount":937,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Hukuki Haberler"],"inLanguage":"uk"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-6458-basvuru-numarali-karari\/","url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-6458-basvuru-numarali-karari\/","name":"AYM'nin 2020\/6458 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-05-15T09:13:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-6458-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"uk","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-6458-basvuru-numarali-karari\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-6458-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"AYM&#8217;nin 2020\/6458 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#website","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","description":"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"uk"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#organization","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"uk","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","contentUrl":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","width":1080,"height":1080,"caption":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822","name":"Hukuki Haber.net","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"uk","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Hukuki Haber.net"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net"],"url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/author\/hukukihabernet\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/87235","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=87235"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/87235\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=87235"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=87235"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=87235"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}