T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130NAN YAMAN VE D\u0130\u011eERLER\u0130 BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/39434)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 5\/2\/2025<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Selahaddin MENTE\u015e<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130rfan F\u0130DAN<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Muhterem \u0130NCE<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Ay\u015fe Didem \u00d6ZDEM\u0130R AKCA<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucular<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
1. \u0130nan YAMAN<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
2. Mehmet YAMAN<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
3. Mert YAMAN<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
4. Muammer YAMAN<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
5. Ozan Hasan AYDEM\u0130R<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
6. Tahsin DEM\u0130R<\/p>\n
Vekilleri<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Naif \u015eA\u015eMA<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Av. Metin AK\u00c7ILGIN<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, kolluk g\u00f6revlilerinin fiziksel \u015fiddeti ve olay hakk\u0131nda etkili ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmemesi nedeniyle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlali iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n bireysel ba\u015fvuru formunda anlatt\u0131klar\u0131na g\u00f6re ilgili olaylar \u015fu \u015fekilde geli\u015fmi\u015ftir:<\/p>\n
i. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n yak\u0131n\u0131 olan ya\u015flar\u0131 k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck (ba\u015fvuru d\u0131\u015f\u0131) K.S. ve M.Y. Kimlik sorulmas\u0131 \u00fczerine geli\u015fen olaylar s\u0131ras\u0131nda polis memurlar\u0131n\u0131n orant\u0131s\u0131z m\u00fcdahalesine maruz kalm\u0131\u015f, M.Y. sonras\u0131nda tedavi i\u00e7in Haseki E\u011fitim Ara\u015ft\u0131rma Hastanesine g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
ii. M.Y.yi g\u00f6rmek i\u00e7in hastaneye giden ba\u015fvuruculara hakaret eden polis memurlar\u0131, \u00e7\u0131kan arbede s\u0131ras\u0131nda ba\u015fvuruculara fiziksel \u015fiddet uygulam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
iii. Ba\u015fvurucu Mehmet Yaman olay s\u0131ras\u0131nda d\u00fc\u015fmesi nedeniyle komaya girmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
3. Kolluk g\u00f6revlileri taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen 16\/2\/2020 tarihli olay tutana\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6re ilgili olaylar \u015fu \u015fekilde geli\u015fmi\u015ftir:<\/p>\n
i. Kimlik kontrol\u00fcne direnen ve \u00fczerinde b\u0131\u00e7ak ele ge\u00e7irilmesi \u00fczerine ekip arac\u0131na bindirilmek istenen M.Y.nin yak\u0131n\u0131 ba\u015fvurucu Mert Yaman ve beraberindeki 10-15 ki\u015filik grubun olay yerine gelerek arac\u0131n etraf\u0131n\u0131 sarm\u0131\u015flard\u0131r.<\/p>\n
ii. Rapor al\u0131nmak \u00fczere Hastaneye ge\u00e7ildi\u011finde ba\u015fvurucu Mehmet Yaman ile sonradan ka\u00e7an 5-6 ki\u015fi M.Y.nin b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 istemi\u015fler, bu ki\u015filer binadan uzakla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015flard\u0131r.<\/p>\n
iii. K\u0131sa bir s\u00fcre sonra Hastane bah\u00e7esinde ba\u015fvurucularla kimlikleri tespit edilemeyen 6-7 ki\u015fi ve polis memurlar\u0131 aras\u0131nda arbede ya\u015fanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
iv. Takviye kuvvet istenmi\u015f, bu s\u0131rada ba\u015fvurucu Mehmet Yaman bay\u0131larak yere d\u00fc\u015fm\u00fc\u015f ve kafas\u0131n\u0131 yere \u00e7arpm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
v. Yaralanan polis memurlar\u0131 ve ba\u015fvurucular acil servise g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f, ba\u015fvurucular, tutana\u011f\u0131 imzalamaktan imtina etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. Hastanenin ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn d\u00fczenledi\u011fi adli muayene raporlar\u0131nda;<\/p>\n
i. Ba\u015fvurucu \u0130nan Yaman’\u0131n sa\u011f diz posteriorunda 2×1 cm \u00e7ap\u0131nda hiperemik alan, sol ayak bile\u011finde 3×2 cm \u00e7ap\u0131nda hiperemik alan oldu\u011fu,<\/p>\n
ii. Ba\u015fvurucu Mert Yaman’\u0131n sa\u011f omuz ekleminde 3×2 cm\u00e7ap\u0131nda hiperemik alan, sa\u011f dirsekte 3×2 \u00e7ap\u0131ndahiperemik, g\u00f6\u011f\u00fcs solpektoral kasta1x5 cm \u00e7ap\u0131nda \u015ferit \u015feklinde hiperemi alan,sol omuz eklem posteriorda b\u00f6lgede 5×4 cm \u00e7ap\u0131nda sirk\u00fcler tarzdaekimotik alan, s\u0131rt sol skapula b\u00f6lgesinde 4×3 cm \u00e7ap\u0131nda s\u00fcrkiler aras\u0131da hiperemi alan, boyun sol lateral b\u00f6lgede 1×3 cm \u00e7ap\u0131nda hiperemi alan, burun k\u00f6k\u00fc \u015fi\u015f ve \u00f6demli burundayayg\u0131n ekimotik alan, y\u00fcz sol zigomatik b\u00f6lgede 4×3 cm \u00e7ap\u0131nda hiperemi alan, al\u0131n sol superiorda 3×3 cm \u00e7ap\u0131nda ekimotik alana e\u015flik eden \u015fi\u015flik sol prefrontal b\u00f6lgede 2×3 cm \u00e7ap\u0131nda hiperemik alan, al\u0131n sol b\u00f6lgede 4x5cm , 4×5, 3×4 cm ekimotik alanlar sol preaurikular b\u00f6lgede 1×2 cm 1×3 cm ve 2×2 cm \u00e7aplar\u0131nda ekimotik alanlar, ba\u015f sol temporal b\u00f6lgede 3×4 cm \u00e7ap\u0131nda hiperemik alan, sa\u011f g\u00f6z kapa\u011f\u0131nda ekimoz ve \u015fi\u015flik, sol sklera hiperemik, darba ba\u011fl\u0131 sa\u011f ve sol kolda travmaya ba\u011fl\u0131 hareket k\u0131s\u0131tl\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 oldu\u011fu,<\/p>\n
iii. Ba\u015fvurucu Muammer Yaman’\u0131n biber gaz\u0131 nedeniyle sa\u011f ve sol g\u00f6z\u00fcn\u00fc a\u00e7makta zorland\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan g\u00f6z muayenesinin yap\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131, sa\u011f ve sol lumber b\u00f6lgede k\u0131zar\u0131kl\u0131k, kafa frontal b\u00f6lgede 2×2 cm \u00e7ap\u0131ndahiperemi alan, sa\u011f yanakta 1×2 cm \u00e7ap\u0131nda hiperemik alan, al\u0131n ve y\u00fcz b\u00f6lgesinde biber gaz\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 yayg\u0131n k\u0131zar\u0131kl\u0131k, sol uyluk posteriorda 6×5 cm ve 5×1 cm \u00e7aplar\u0131ndak\u0131zar\u0131kl\u0131k oldu\u011fu,<\/p>\n
iv. Ba\u015fvurucu Ozan Hasan Aydemir’in sa\u011f ve sol elde yer yer hiperemik alanlar, s\u0131rt sol skapular hatta 3×2 cm \u00e7ap\u0131nda \u015fiddetli k\u0131zar\u0131k, sa\u011f ve sol sklera hiperemik, sa\u011f-sol kulak heliks ve antihelik yap\u0131lar\u0131 \u015fiddetli k\u0131zar\u0131k, ba\u015f sa\u011f temporal b\u00f6lgede 5×4 cm \u00e7ap\u0131nda \u015fiddetli k\u0131zar\u0131k, ba\u015f sol frontal b\u00f6lgede 2×3 cm \u015fi\u015fli\u011fe e\u015flik eden hiperemik-ekimozik alan, y\u00fcz sol zigomatik b\u00f6lgede 3×2 cm \u00e7ap\u0131nda hiperemik alan, al\u0131n ve nasal b\u00f6lgede k\u0131zar\u0131kl\u0131k (biber gaz\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131), sa\u011f g\u00f6z kapa\u011f\u0131 \u015fi\u015f ve \u00f6demli, sa\u011f klavikula \u00fcst b\u00f6lgesinde 2×3 cm \u00e7ap\u0131nda hiperemi, sol uyluk posteriorda 3×2 cm \u00e7ap\u0131nda hiperemi, sol diz lateralde 4×3 cm \u015fi\u015flik ve sa\u011f antekubital b\u00f6liede 1×2 cm \u00e7ap\u0131nda hiperemik alan mevcut oldu\u011fu,<\/p>\n
v. Ba\u015fvurucu Tahsin Demir’in s\u0131rt sol b\u00f6lgede \u015ferit \u015feklinde 2×7 cm \u00e7ap\u0131nda hiperemik alan, s\u0131rt sa\u011f lumbar b\u00f6lgede 2×6 cm \u00e7ap\u0131nda \u015ferit \u015feklinde hiperemik alan, sa\u011f kol posteriorda 2×8 cm \u00e7ap\u0131nda hiperemik alan, sa\u011f g\u00f6z kapa\u011f\u0131 \u015fi\u015f ve \u00f6demli, sa\u011f g\u00f6z kapa\u011f\u0131 hiperemik ve ekimozik, y\u00fcz sa\u011f zigomatik b\u00f6lgede yer yer hiperemik alanlar mevcut, burun k\u00f6k\u00fc \u015fi\u015f ve \u00f6demli, burun sol kanad\u0131 \u015fiddetli k\u0131zar\u0131k, sol omuz ekleminde 2×2 cm, 1×1 cm ve 1×2 cm \u00e7aplar\u0131nda \u015fiddeti y\u00fcksek k\u0131zar\u0131kl\u0131klar mevcut, sa\u011f uyluk posteriorda 2×8 cm \u00e7ap\u0131nda \u015ferit \u015feklinde hiperemik alan, sol bacak posteriorda 2×4 cm ve 2×5 cm \u00e7aplar\u0131nda hiperemik alanlar, sol alt ekstremitede darp sonras\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi beyan edilen y\u00fcr\u00fcme bozuklu\u011fu oldu\u011fu belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucu Mehmet Yaman hakk\u0131nda \u0130stanbul \u00dcniversitesi T\u0131p Fak\u00fcltesi taraf\u0131ndan olay g\u00fcn\u00fc d\u00fczenlenen \u00f6n adli rapor formunda darp nedeniyle intraserebral hematom ve talamik kanama meydana geldi\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. \u0130stanbul Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) olay hakk\u0131nda resen ba\u015flat\u0131lan soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda \u0130stanbul Adli T\u0131p \u015eube M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden al\u0131nan raporda; ba\u015fvurucular \u0130nan Yaman ve Muammer Yaman’\u0131n yaralanmas\u0131n\u0131n basit t\u0131bbi m\u00fcdahaleyle giderilebilecek \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde hafif oldu\u011fu, ba\u015fvurucu Mert Yaman’\u0131n yaralanmas\u0131n\u0131n ise basit t\u0131bbi m\u00fcdahaleyle giderilebilecek \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde hafif olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bildirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. Soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda \u0130stanbul Adli T\u0131p \u015eube M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden m\u00fc\u015fteki kolluk g\u00f6revlilerinin hastanenin 16\/2\/2020 tarihli raporlar\u0131na dayal\u0131 olarak kesin raporlar\u0131 al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Buna g\u00f6re polis memuru B.K.n\u0131n ense k\u00f6k\u00fcnde 5×2 cm2x5 cm ve 4×2 cm \u00e7ap\u0131nda k\u0131zar\u0131kl\u0131k, sol kol medial b\u00f6lgede 2×1 cm ve 3×2 cm \u00e7ap\u0131nda k\u0131zar\u0131kl\u0131k oldu\u011fu, polis memuru G.B.G.nin sa\u011f el 5. MKF eklemde a\u011fr\u0131, sa\u011f el s\u0131rt\u0131nda k\u0131zar\u0131kl\u0131k, sa\u011f el 3. MKF eklemde 0,5×1 cm abrazyon, sol antekubital b\u00f6lgede 1×1 cm, boyun sa\u011f lateral b\u00f6lgede 2×3 cm boyun sol lateral b\u00f6lgede 3×4 cm hiperemi ense k\u00f6k\u00fcnde k\u0131zar\u0131kl\u0131k oldu\u011fu, polis memuru M.T.nin boyun sol lateral b\u00f6lgede 3×2 cm, boyun sa\u011f lateral b\u00f6lgede 2×2 cm \u00e7ap\u0131nda k\u0131zar\u0131kl\u0131k oldu\u011fu; polis memuru S.D.nin sol el s\u0131rt\u0131nda 2×2 cm \u00e7ap\u0131nda k\u0131zar\u0131kl\u0131k oldu\u011fu; yaralanmalar\u0131n basit bir t\u0131bbi m\u00fcdahaleyle giderilebilecek \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde hafif nitelikte oldu\u011fu tespit edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. Soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda bilgisayar programc\u0131s\u0131 bilirki\u015fi taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc inceleme raporunda, olay\u0131n ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7 a\u015famas\u0131na ili\u015fkin ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n hastane i\u00e7indeki g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcleri haricinde g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, cep telefonuyla \u00e7ekilen 12 saniyelik g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcn\u00fcn izlenmesi neticesinde Yunus polislerinin yerdeki ki\u015fiye m\u00fcdahale etti\u011finin belirlendi\u011fi ifade edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n \u015fik\u00e2yeti hakk\u0131nda 23\/9\/2020 tarihinde kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair ek karar verilmi\u015ftir. Karar gerek\u00e7esinde, kimlik kontrol\u00fc s\u0131ras\u0131nda \u00fczerinde b\u0131\u00e7ak bulundu\u011fu tespit edilen M.Y.nin yak\u0131nlar\u0131 olan ba\u015fvurucular ile polis memurlar\u0131 aras\u0131nda hastane bah\u00e7esinde arbede \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131, polis memurlar\u0131na yumruk ve tekmelerle vurulmas\u0131 \u00fczerine polis memurlar\u0131n\u0131n havaya ate\u015f a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131, iki memurun elinden, bir memurun ise elinden ve boynundan yaraland\u0131\u011f\u0131, takviye ekiplerce biber gaz\u0131 kullan\u0131larak orant\u0131l\u0131 m\u00fcdahalede bulunuldu\u011fu, ba\u015fvurucu Mehmet Yaman’\u0131n aniden bay\u0131larak yer d\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve kafas\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7arpt\u0131\u011f\u0131, ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n orant\u0131l\u0131 m\u00fcdahale neticesinde yaraland\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n karara itiraz\u0131, sulh ceza h\u00e2kimli\u011fince reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
10. Ba\u015fvurucular nihai karar\u0131 12\/10\/2020 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra 6\/11\/2020 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
11. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucular hakk\u0131nda 24\/9\/2020 tarihinde g\u00f6reviyapt\u0131rmamak i\u00e7in direnme su\u00e7undan kamu davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Yarg\u0131lamada 29\/4\/2021 tarihinde yap\u0131lan ikinci oturumda ba\u015fvurucu Mehmet Yaman, olaya ili\u015fkin idari soru\u015fturma yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve kendisine \u015fiddet uygulayanlar\u0131 te\u015fhis etti\u011fini ifade etmi\u015ftir. Yarg\u0131lama neticesinde ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n isnat edilen su\u00e7u i\u015flediklerine ili\u015fkin yeterli ve inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 deliller elde edilemedi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle beraat karar\u0131 verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
12. Karar gerek\u00e7esinde, olay an\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6steren g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n sunuldu\u011fu ancak bir\u00e7ok ki\u015finin bulunmas\u0131 ve havan\u0131n karanl\u0131k olmas\u0131 nedeniyle san\u0131klar\u0131n eylemlerinin tespit edilemedi\u011fi, olay tarihinde M.Y.nin kimlik kontrol\u00fc s\u0131ras\u0131nda ka\u00e7mak istemesiyle g\u00f6zalt\u0131 i\u015flemi yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, sonras\u0131nda yak\u0131nlar\u0131n\u0131n toplanarak hastaneye ve polis karakoluna geldi\u011fi, grup ile polis memurlar\u0131 aras\u0131nda gerginlik ya\u015fand\u0131\u011f\u0131, san\u0131klar\u0131n eyleminin ne oldu\u011funun ispatlanamad\u0131\u011f\u0131, g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerden somut bir tespit yap\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir. Karar istinaf incelemesinden ge\u00e7erek 13\/2\/2023 tarihinde kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
13. Ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
14. \u00d6deme g\u00fcc\u00fcnden yoksun oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n adli yard\u0131m taleplerinin kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
15. Ba\u015fvurucular kolluk g\u00f6revlilerinin fiziksel \u015fiddeti ve olay nedeniyle y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturmada eksik incelemeyle karar verilmesi, ifadelerinin ayn\u0131 polis merkezinde g\u00f6revli memurlar taraf\u0131ndan al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 ve Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan ifade al\u0131nmamas\u0131 nedenleriyle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131, etkili ba\u015fvuru ve adil yarg\u0131lanma haklar\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinden \u015fik\u00e2yet etmi\u015ftir. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde, ihlal iddialar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesi s\u0131ras\u0131nda ilgili mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmleri ve i\u00e7tihatlar ile somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi bildirilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucular, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
16. Ba\u015fvuru, k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
17. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
18. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesi -\u201cDevletin temel ama\u00e7 ve g\u00f6revleri\u201d kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 5. maddesindeki genel y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckle birlikte yorumland\u0131\u011f\u0131nda- bir kimsenin devlet g\u00f6revlilerinin 17. maddenin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131 ihlal eden bir muamelesine u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin savunulabilir bir iddiada bulunmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde etkili bir soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesini gerektirir. K\u00f6t\u00fc muamelenin kasten yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ileri s\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc durumlarda iddia hakk\u0131nda ivedilikle bir ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 ba\u015flat\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. \u015eik\u00e2yet olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131nda bile ki\u015fiye k\u00f6t\u00fc muamelede bulunuldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin yeterince a\u00e7\u0131k belirtiler varsa konuyla ilgili bir ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. Soru\u015fturmada olay\u0131 ayd\u0131nlatabilecek ve sorumlular\u0131n belirlenmesini sa\u011flayabilecek t\u00fcm deliller toplanmal\u0131d\u0131r. Dahas\u0131 soru\u015fturma s\u00fcreci; gerekti\u011fi \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde kamu denetimine ve ma\u011fdurun eri\u015fimine a\u00e7\u0131k olmal\u0131, ma\u011fdur soru\u015fturmaya etkili \u015fekilde kat\u0131labilmeli, soru\u015fturmada makul bir \u00f6zen ve s\u00fcratle hareket edilmelidir. Ayr\u0131ca yetkililer, soru\u015fturmay\u0131 sonland\u0131rmak i\u00e7in aceleci davranmamal\u0131 ve temelden yoksun sonu\u00e7lara dayanmamal\u0131d\u0131r (Ali R\u0131za \u00d6zer ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2013\/3924, 6\/1\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 101-103; S.D. [1.B.], B. No: 2013\/3017, 16\/12\/2015,b\u00a7\u00a7 111-114; Veli Sa\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k (2) [1.B.], B. No: 2018\/24614, 18\/10\/2022, \u00a7 16).<\/p>\n
19. Olay\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fme ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n tespitine ve varsa sorumlular\u0131n belirlenerek m\u00fcmk\u00fcnse cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmalar\u0131na engel olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcrece Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesi gere\u011fince y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclecek soru\u015fturmalarda soru\u015fturma makamlar\u0131n\u0131n olay\u0131n geli\u015fimine ve delillerin elde edilmesine ili\u015fkin olarak ma\u011fdurun her t\u00fcrl\u00fc iddialar\u0131n\u0131 ve taleplerini kar\u015f\u0131lama zorunlulu\u011fu bulunmamaktad\u0131r (Mehmet Bayram [1.B.], B. No: 2013\/5963, 13\/4\/2016, \u00a7 50).<\/p>\n
20. Somut olayda kamera kayd\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcleri temin edilmi\u015f ancak olay\u0131n hastanebah\u00e7esinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmi\u015f olmas\u0131 nedeniyle g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerde olay\u0131n nas\u0131l meydana geldi\u011fine ili\u015fkin veri elde edilememi\u015ftir. Bu durumdaolay\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fme ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n tespitinde taraflar\u0131n beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6nem te\u015fkil etti\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin evrak tespit edilememektedir. Cep telefonu kameras\u0131yla kaydedilmi\u015f 12 saniyelik bir g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc tespiti mevcuttur. Bu g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclere ili\u015fkin d\u00fczenlenen raporda, “polislerin yerdeki ki\u015fiye m\u00fcdahale ettikleri” ibaresi yer alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Buradaki m\u00fcdahale ibaresinin a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131\u011fa kavu\u015fturulmas\u0131, m\u00fcdahale edilen ki\u015finin kim oldu\u011funun tespit edilmesi ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n iddialar\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden \u00f6nem te\u015fkil etmesine kar\u015f\u0131n bu hususlar\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
21. Kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair kararda kolluk g\u00f6revlilerinin g\u00fc\u00e7 kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifade edilmi\u015f ancak kullan\u0131lan g\u00fcce ili\u015fkin ba\u015fka herhangi bir de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Kararda, ba\u015fvurucu Mehmet Yaman’\u0131n aniden bay\u0131larak yere d\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve kafas\u0131n\u0131 yere \u00e7arpt\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015fse de soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda d\u00fc\u015fmenin nas\u0131l meydana geldi\u011fi konusunda herhangi bir ara\u015ft\u0131rma yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f, ba\u015fvurucunun beyanlar\u0131 al\u0131nmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Olay nedeniyle ba\u015flat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifade edilen idari soru\u015fturmaya ili\u015fkin inceleme ve de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ayr\u0131ca olay\u0131n g\u00f6rg\u00fc tan\u0131klar\u0131 ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131larak dinlenmemi\u015f, ba\u015fvuruculara canl\u0131 ya da foto\u011fraf \u00fczerinden te\u015fhis yapt\u0131r\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n yaralanmalar\u0131na ili\u015fkin kesin rapor ald\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 da yine dosya kapsam\u0131ndan tespit edilememektedir. Soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda karara dayanak al\u0131nan delillerin yaln\u0131zca kolluk taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen tutanaklar oldu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir.<\/p>\n
22. B\u00fct\u00fcn bu eksiklikler birlikte de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde, soru\u015fturman\u0131n k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele iddialar\u0131n\u0131n gerektirdi\u011fi derinlikte y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmedi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Sonu\u00e7 olarak k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele olu\u015fturdu\u011fu iddia edilen eylemlerin ve olay\u0131n ayd\u0131nlat\u0131lmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla resen ba\u015flat\u0131lan etkili bir ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131n\u0131n y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmedi\u011fi, yetkililerce soru\u015fturmay\u0131 sonland\u0131rmak i\u00e7in aceleci davranmama ve temelden yoksun sonu\u00e7lara dayanmama gerekliliklerine uyma konusunda gerekli \u00f6zenin g\u00f6sterilmedi\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
23. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutunun ihlal edildi\u011fi sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
24. K\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n maddi boyutu y\u00f6n\u00fcnden bir de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmas\u0131 bu a\u015famada m\u00fcmk\u00fcn g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M <\/p>\n
25. Ba\u015fvurucular; ihlalin tespiti, yeniden soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmas\u0131, ba\u015fvurucular i\u00e7in ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 20.000 TL maddi ve 20.000 TL manevi tazminat talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
26. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar ve zorunluluk bulunmaktad\u0131r. Anayasa’n\u0131n 148. ve 153. maddeleri ile 30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 50. ve 66. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca ihlal karar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi soru\u015fturma makam\u0131nca yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden soru\u015fturma i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flat\u0131p Anayasa Mahkemesinin ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere ve gerek\u00e7elere uygun bi\u00e7imde y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclecek soru\u015fturma sonunda hak ihlalinin nedenlerini gidererek yeni bir karar vermektir (yeniden yarg\u0131lama konusunda bkz. Mehmet Do\u011fan [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n
27. \u00d6te yandan hak ihlali karar\u0131ndan Anayasa Mahkemesinin soru\u015fturman\u0131n sonucuyla ilgili olarak bir tutum sergiledi\u011fi sonucu \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmamal\u0131d\u0131r.Anayasa Mahkemesince verilen hak ihlali karar\u0131 var\u0131lan sonu\u00e7tan ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z olup soru\u015fturman\u0131n \u015f\u00fcpheli ki\u015fi veya ki\u015filer hakk\u0131nda kamu davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi anlam\u0131na gelmemektedir. Kural olarak, soru\u015fturman\u0131n her a\u015famas\u0131nda oldu\u011fu gibi ihlalin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 gidermek \u00fczere yeniden yap\u0131lacak soru\u015fturma sonunda da delillerin soru\u015fturma ile ili\u015fkisini kurma ve bunlar\u0131 de\u011ferlendirip sonu\u00e7 \u00e7\u0131karma yetkisi ilgili soru\u015fturma makam\u0131na aittir.<\/p>\n
28. Ayr\u0131ca ba\u015fvuruculara manevi zararlar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda taleple ba\u011fl\u0131 kal\u0131narak ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 net 20.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00f6denmesine karar verilmesi gerekir. Ba\u015fvurucular, maddi zarara ili\u015fkin olarak bilgi\/belge sunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan maddi tazminat talebinin reddine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Adli yard\u0131m talebinin KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n
B. K\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutunun ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
C. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutunun \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere \u0130stanbul Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE, (Soru\u015fturma no.: 2020\/38212)<\/p>\n
E. Ba\u015fvuruculara ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 net 20.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE, tazminata ili\u015fkin di\u011fer taleplerin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
F. 30.000 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinden olu\u015fan toplam yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvuruculara M\u00dc\u015eTEREKEN \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
G. \u00d6demelerin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
H. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin bilgi i\u00e7in \u0130stanbul 8. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesine ve Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE, 5\/2\/2025 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 5\/2\/2025 tarihli ve 2020\/39434 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u0130NAN YAMAN VE D\u0130\u011eERLER\u0130 BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/39434) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 5\/2\/2025 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ \u00a0 \u00a0 Selahaddin MENTE\u015e \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130rfan F\u0130DAN \u00a0 \u00a0 Muhterem \u0130NCE Raport\u00f6r : Ay\u015fe Didem \u00d6ZDEM\u0130R AKCA Ba\u015fvurucular : 1. \u0130nan YAMAN \u00a0 \u00a0 2. Mehmet YAMAN \u00a0 \u00a0 3. Mert YAMAN \u00a0 \u00a0 4. Muammer YAMAN \u00a0 \u00a0 5. Ozan Hasan AYDEM\u0130R \u00a0 \u00a0 6. Tahsin DEM\u0130R Vekilleri : Av. Naif \u015eA\u015eMA \u00a0 \u00a0 Av. Metin AK\u00c7ILGIN \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, kolluk g\u00f6revlilerinin fiziksel \u015fiddeti ve olay hakk\u0131nda etkili ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmemesi nedeniyle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlali iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n bireysel ba\u015fvuru formunda anlatt\u0131klar\u0131na g\u00f6re ilgili olaylar \u015fu \u015fekilde geli\u015fmi\u015ftir: i. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n yak\u0131n\u0131 olan ya\u015flar\u0131 k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck (ba\u015fvuru d\u0131\u015f\u0131) K.S. ve M.Y. Kimlik sorulmas\u0131 \u00fczerine geli\u015fen olaylar s\u0131ras\u0131nda polis memurlar\u0131n\u0131n orant\u0131s\u0131z m\u00fcdahalesine maruz kalm\u0131\u015f, M.Y. sonras\u0131nda tedavi i\u00e7in Haseki E\u011fitim Ara\u015ft\u0131rma Hastanesine g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. ii. M.Y.yi g\u00f6rmek i\u00e7in hastaneye giden ba\u015fvuruculara hakaret eden polis memurlar\u0131, \u00e7\u0131kan arbede s\u0131ras\u0131nda ba\u015fvuruculara fiziksel \u015fiddet uygulam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. iii. Ba\u015fvurucu Mehmet Yaman olay s\u0131ras\u0131nda d\u00fc\u015fmesi nedeniyle komaya girmi\u015ftir. 3. Kolluk g\u00f6revlileri taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen 16\/2\/2020 …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-65015","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n