{"id":65011,"date":"2025-04-24T14:39:00","date_gmt":"2025-04-24T11:39:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uncategorized-tr\/aymnin-2020-31980-basvuru-numarali-karari\/"},"modified":"2025-04-24T14:39:00","modified_gmt":"2025-04-24T11:39:00","slug":"aymnin-2020-31980-basvuru-numarali-karari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-31980-basvuru-numarali-karari\/","title":{"rendered":"AYM’nin 2020\/31980 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"

T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n

ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

KARAR<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

LEVENT \u015eAH\u0130N BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n

(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/31980)<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Karar Tarihi: 21\/1\/2025<\/p>\n

B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

KARAR<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n

:<\/p>\n

Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n

\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n

:<\/p>\n

Recai AKYEL<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Selahaddin MENTE\u015e<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Muhterem \u0130NCE<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n

Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n

:<\/p>\n

Mustafa \u015eENOCAK<\/p>\n

Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n

:<\/p>\n

Levent \u015eAH\u0130N<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n

1. Ba\u015fvuru; istinaf dairesi karar\u0131n\u0131n, talepte bulunulmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen san\u0131\u011fa tebli\u011f edilmemesi nedeniyle mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n

2. Antalya Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) Fetullah\u00e7\u0131 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc\/Paralel Devlet Yap\u0131lanmas\u0131 (FET\u00d6\/PDY) \u00fcyesi oldu\u011fu \u015f\u00fcphesiyle ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda soru\u015fturma ba\u015flatm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

3. Soru\u015fturma neticesinde Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, ba\u015fvurucunun silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 talebiyle 12\/6\/2017 tarihli iddianame d\u00fczenlemi\u015ftir. \u0130ddianamede \u00f6zetle ba\u015fvurucunun ByLock tespiti, HTS raporu ve tan\u0131klar\u0131n anlat\u0131mlar\u0131 neticesinde at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7u i\u015fledi\u011fi iddia edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

4. \u0130ddianamenin kabul\u00fc ile a\u00e7\u0131lan dava, Antalya 9. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesince g\u00f6r\u00fclmeye ba\u015flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu, Antalya 9. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesince (Mahkeme) FET\u00d6\/PDY’ye \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan 7 y\u0131l 6 ay hapis cezas\u0131na mahk\u00fbm edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

5. Ba\u015fvurucunun bu karara kar\u015f\u0131 yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 istinaf kanun yolu ba\u015fvurusu Antalya B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 2. Ceza Dairesinin (Daire) 29\/11\/2018 tarihli karar\u0131yla esastan reddedilmi\u015ftir. An\u0131lan karar ba\u015fvurucu m\u00fcdafine tebli\u011f edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

6. Ba\u015fvurucu, farkl\u0131 tarihlerde yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131 dilek\u00e7eler ile istinaf kanun yolu ba\u015fvurusunun esastan reddine ili\u015fkin Daire karar\u0131n\u0131n bizzat kendisine tebli\u011f edilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir. Dosya i\u00e7eri\u011fine ve Mahkemece yaz\u0131lan 5\/6\/2024 tarihli m\u00fczekkereye verilen 6\/6\/2024 tarihli cevaba g\u00f6re s\u00f6z konusu karar\u0131n Daire taraf\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucuya tebli\u011f edilmedi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

7. Ba\u015fvurucu m\u00fcdafii, bu karara kar\u015f\u0131 8\/1\/2019 tarihinde temyiz kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur. Yarg\u0131tay (Kapat\u0131lan) 16. Ceza Dairesi 15\/6\/2020 tarihinde temyiz talebinin reddi ile h\u00fckm\u00fcn onanmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

8. Ba\u015fvurucu, nihai h\u00fckm\u00fc 15\/9\/2020 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra 30\/9\/2020 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

9. Komisyon, ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n

A. Mahkemeye Eri\u015fim Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n

10. Ba\u015fvurucu; istinaf dairesi karar\u0131n\u0131n, talep etmesine ra\u011fmen kendisine tebli\u011f edilmedi\u011fini, bizzat temyiz hakk\u0131n\u0131 kullanamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek bu durumun adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131 ihlal etti\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n

11. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde, tan\u0131klar\u0131n istinabe yoluyla al\u0131nan beyanlar\u0131n duru\u015fmada okundu\u011fu ve ba\u015fvurucunun bunlara kar\u015f\u0131 iddia ve itirazlar\u0131n\u0131 dile getirdi\u011fi ifade edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne ili\u015fkin beyan\u0131nda genel olarak bireysel ba\u015fvuru formundaki iddialar\u0131n\u0131 yinelemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

12. Ba\u015fvuru, adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

13. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n

14. Anayasa Mahkemesi daha \u00f6nce benzer bir \u015fik\u00e2yeti Hakan Da\u011f ([1. B.], B. No: 2020\/32671, 28\/11\/2024) ve Behiye \u00c7a\u011fl\u0131yan ([2. B.], B. No: 2021\/34076, 14\/1\/2025) ba\u015fvurular\u0131nda incelemi\u015f ve karara ba\u011flam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Anayasa Mahkemesi an\u0131lan ba\u015fvurularda 11\/2\/1959 tarihli ve 7201 say\u0131l\u0131 Tebligat Kanunu’nun 11. maddesi, an\u0131lan maddede 6\/6\/1985 tarihli ve 3220 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun ile yap\u0131lan de\u011fi\u015fiklik ve gerek\u00e7esine g\u00f6re; ceza davalar\u0131nda istinaf ve temyiz kanun yolu ba\u015fvurular\u0131na ili\u015fkin kararlar\u0131n san\u0131klar yerine m\u00fcdafiine tebli\u011fiyle yetinilemeyece\u011fini vurgulam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla a\u00e7\u0131k kanun\u00ee d\u00fczenleme ve kanun gerek\u00e7esine ra\u011fmen kararlar\u0131n san\u0131klara tebli\u011f edilmemesiyle ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen m\u00fcdahalenin kanuni dayana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

15. Somut olayda ba\u015fvurucunun istinaf kanun yolu talebinin esastan reddine ili\u015fkin Daire karar\u0131n\u0131n kendisine tebli\u011f edilmesini talep etmesine ra\u011fmen an\u0131lan karar\u0131n Daire taraf\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucuya tebli\u011f edilmedi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (bkz. \u00a7 6).<\/p>\n

16. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla eldeki ba\u015fvuruda da yukar\u0131da an\u0131lan kararlardan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren bir husus bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucunun mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

17. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa’n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n

B. Tan\u0131k Sorgulama Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin iddia<\/p>\n

18. Ba\u015fvurucu; gerek\u00e7eli kararda beyanlar\u0131na yer verilen tan\u0131klar\u0131n huzurda dinlenilmesi i\u00e7in Mahkemenin herhangi bir giri\u015fimde bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kendisine tan\u0131klara soru sorma imk\u00e2n\u0131 tan\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu suretle tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Anayasa Mahkemesi, bir\u00e7ok karar\u0131nda tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131 ile ilgili ilkeleri belirlemi\u015ftir (Atila O\u011fuz Boyal\u0131 [2. B.], B. No: 2013\/99, 20\/3\/2014, \u00a7\u00a7 34-56; Sel\u00e7uk Demir [2. B.], B. No: 2014\/9783, 22\/1\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 27-46; AZ. M. [2. B.], B. No: 2013\/560, 16\/4\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 45-67; Baran Karada\u011f [2. B.], B. No: 2014\/12906, 7\/5\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 49-76; Orhan G\u00fclery\u00fcz [1. B.], B. No: 2019\/30221, 28\/12\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 33-42; Abdurrahim Balur [2. B.], B. No: 2013\/5467, 7\/1\/2016, \u00a7 80; Onur Urbay [1. B.], B. No: 2014\/6222, 6\/3\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 36, 40; Zekeriya Sevim [2. B.], B. No: 2018\/18989, 16\/6\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 44, 51; Metin Akdemir (2) [1. B.], B. No: 2020\/3964, 21\/9\/2022, \u00a7 36; U\u011fur \u00d6zcan [1. B.], B. No: 2021\/12137, 26\/7\/2022, \u00a7 40).<\/p>\n

19. Eldeki ba\u015fvuruda ba\u015fvurucunun mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, var\u0131lan sonuca ve yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131 karar\u0131na g\u00f6re tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen \u015fik\u00e2yetler hakk\u0131nda ayr\u0131ca bir inceleme yap\u0131lmas\u0131na gerek g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

III. G\u0130DER\u0130M<\/p>\n

20. Ba\u015fvurucu; ihlalin tespiti, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n yenilenmesi ve manevi tazminat talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

21. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen anayasal hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar ve zorunluluk bulunmaktad\u0131r. Anayasa’n\u0131n 148. ve 153. maddeleri ile 30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 50. ve 66. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca ihlal karar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi yarg\u0131 mercilerince yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden yarg\u0131lama i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flat\u0131p Anayasa Mahkemesinin ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere ve gerek\u00e7elere uygun bi\u00e7imde y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclecek yarg\u0131lama sonunda hak ihlalinin nedenlerini gidererek yeni bir karar vermektir (yeniden yarg\u0131lama konusunda bkz. Mehmet Do\u011fan [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n

22. \u00d6te yandan hak ihlali karar\u0131ndan Anayasa Mahkemesinin davan\u0131n sonucuyla ilgili olarak bir tutum sergiledi\u011fi sonucu \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmamal\u0131d\u0131r. Anayasa Mahkemesince verilen hak ihlali karar\u0131 uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n sonu\u00e7lar\u0131ndan ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z olup davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne, reddine ya da beraate veya mahk\u00fbmiyete karar verilmesi gerekti\u011fi anlam\u0131na gelmemektedir. Kural olarak, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n her a\u015famas\u0131nda oldu\u011fu gibi ihlalin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 gidermek \u00fczere yeniden yap\u0131lacak yarg\u0131lama sonunda da delillerin dava ile ili\u015fkisini kurma ve bunlar\u0131 de\u011ferlendirip sonu\u00e7 \u00e7\u0131karma yetkisi ilgili mahkemelere aittir.<\/p>\n

23. \u0130hlalin ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n yeterli bir giderim sa\u011flayaca\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan manevi tazminat talebinin reddine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n

IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n

A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n

A. 1. Mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n

2. Tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n \u0130NCELENMES\u0130NE GEREK BULUNMADI\u011eINA,<\/p>\n

B. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n

C. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere Antalya B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 2. Ceza Dairesine (E:2018\/1513, K:2018\/2470) g\u00f6nderilmesini sa\u011flamak amac\u0131yla Antalya 9. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesine (E.2017\/181, K.2018\/56) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n

D. Ba\u015fvurucunun manevi tazminat talebinin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n

E. 446,90 TL har\u00e7tan olu\u015fan yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvurucuya \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n

F. \u00d6demenin, karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n

G. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 21\/1\/2025 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n

\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 21\/1\/2025 tarihli ve 2020\/31980 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n

Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 LEVENT \u015eAH\u0130N BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/31980) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 21\/1\/2025 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Recai AKYEL \u00a0 \u00a0 Selahaddin MENTE\u015e \u00a0 \u00a0 Muhterem \u0130NCE \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : Mustafa \u015eENOCAK Ba\u015fvurucu : Levent \u015eAH\u0130N \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru; istinaf dairesi karar\u0131n\u0131n, talepte bulunulmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen san\u0131\u011fa tebli\u011f edilmemesi nedeniyle mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Antalya Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) Fetullah\u00e7\u0131 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc\/Paralel Devlet Yap\u0131lanmas\u0131 (FET\u00d6\/PDY) \u00fcyesi oldu\u011fu \u015f\u00fcphesiyle ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda soru\u015fturma ba\u015flatm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 3. Soru\u015fturma neticesinde Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, ba\u015fvurucunun silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 talebiyle 12\/6\/2017 tarihli iddianame d\u00fczenlemi\u015ftir. \u0130ddianamede \u00f6zetle ba\u015fvurucunun ByLock tespiti, HTS raporu ve tan\u0131klar\u0131n anlat\u0131mlar\u0131 neticesinde at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7u i\u015fledi\u011fi iddia edilmi\u015ftir. 4. \u0130ddianamenin kabul\u00fc ile a\u00e7\u0131lan dava, Antalya 9. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesince g\u00f6r\u00fclmeye ba\u015flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu, Antalya 9. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesince (Mahkeme) FET\u00d6\/PDY’ye \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan 7 y\u0131l 6 ay hapis cezas\u0131na mahk\u00fbm edilmi\u015ftir. 5. Ba\u015fvurucunun bu karara kar\u015f\u0131 yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 istinaf kanun yolu ba\u015fvurusu Antalya B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 2. Ceza Dairesinin (Daire) 29\/11\/2018 tarihli karar\u0131yla esastan reddedilmi\u015ftir. An\u0131lan karar ba\u015fvurucu m\u00fcdafine tebli\u011f edilmi\u015ftir. 6. Ba\u015fvurucu, farkl\u0131 tarihlerde yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131 dilek\u00e7eler ile istinaf kanun yolu …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-65011","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nAYM'nin 2020\/31980 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-31980-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"uk_UA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"AYM'nin 2020\/31980 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 LEVENT \u015eAH\u0130N BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/31980) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 21\/1\/2025 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Recai AKYEL \u00a0 \u00a0 Selahaddin MENTE\u015e \u00a0 \u00a0 Muhterem \u0130NCE \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : Mustafa \u015eENOCAK Ba\u015fvurucu : Levent \u015eAH\u0130N \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru; istinaf dairesi karar\u0131n\u0131n, talepte bulunulmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen san\u0131\u011fa tebli\u011f edilmemesi nedeniyle mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Antalya Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) Fetullah\u00e7\u0131 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc\/Paralel Devlet Yap\u0131lanmas\u0131 (FET\u00d6\/PDY) \u00fcyesi oldu\u011fu \u015f\u00fcphesiyle ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda soru\u015fturma ba\u015flatm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 3. Soru\u015fturma neticesinde Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, ba\u015fvurucunun silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 talebiyle 12\/6\/2017 tarihli iddianame d\u00fczenlemi\u015ftir. \u0130ddianamede \u00f6zetle ba\u015fvurucunun ByLock tespiti, HTS raporu ve tan\u0131klar\u0131n anlat\u0131mlar\u0131 neticesinde at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7u i\u015fledi\u011fi iddia edilmi\u015ftir. 4. \u0130ddianamenin kabul\u00fc ile a\u00e7\u0131lan dava, Antalya 9. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesince g\u00f6r\u00fclmeye ba\u015flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu, Antalya 9. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesince (Mahkeme) FET\u00d6\/PDY’ye \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan 7 y\u0131l 6 ay hapis cezas\u0131na mahk\u00fbm edilmi\u015ftir. 5. Ba\u015fvurucunun bu karara kar\u015f\u0131 yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 istinaf kanun yolu ba\u015fvurusu Antalya B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 2. Ceza Dairesinin (Daire) 29\/11\/2018 tarihli karar\u0131yla esastan reddedilmi\u015ftir. An\u0131lan karar ba\u015fvurucu m\u00fcdafine tebli\u011f edilmi\u015ftir. 6. Ba\u015fvurucu, farkl\u0131 tarihlerde yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131 dilek\u00e7eler ile istinaf kanun yolu …\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-31980-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-04-24T11:39:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u043e\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u0431\u043b. \u0447\u0430\u0441 \u0447\u0438\u0442\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 \u0445\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0438\u043d\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-31980-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-31980-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\"},\"headline\":\"AYM’nin 2020\/31980 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-04-24T11:39:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-31980-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\"},\"wordCount\":1515,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Hukuki Haberler\"],\"inLanguage\":\"uk\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-31980-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-31980-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\",\"name\":\"AYM'nin 2020\/31980 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2025-04-24T11:39:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-31980-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"uk\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-31980-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-31980-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"AYM’nin 2020\/31980 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"description\":\"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"uk\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"uk\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"width\":1080,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\",\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"uk\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net\"],\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/author\/hukukihabernet\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"AYM'nin 2020\/31980 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-31980-basvuru-numarali-karari\/","og_locale":"uk_UA","og_type":"article","og_title":"AYM'nin 2020\/31980 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131","og_description":"T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 LEVENT \u015eAH\u0130N BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/31980) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 21\/1\/2025 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Recai AKYEL \u00a0 \u00a0 Selahaddin MENTE\u015e \u00a0 \u00a0 Muhterem \u0130NCE \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : Mustafa \u015eENOCAK Ba\u015fvurucu : Levent \u015eAH\u0130N \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru; istinaf dairesi karar\u0131n\u0131n, talepte bulunulmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen san\u0131\u011fa tebli\u011f edilmemesi nedeniyle mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Antalya Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) Fetullah\u00e7\u0131 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc\/Paralel Devlet Yap\u0131lanmas\u0131 (FET\u00d6\/PDY) \u00fcyesi oldu\u011fu \u015f\u00fcphesiyle ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda soru\u015fturma ba\u015flatm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 3. Soru\u015fturma neticesinde Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, ba\u015fvurucunun silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 talebiyle 12\/6\/2017 tarihli iddianame d\u00fczenlemi\u015ftir. \u0130ddianamede \u00f6zetle ba\u015fvurucunun ByLock tespiti, HTS raporu ve tan\u0131klar\u0131n anlat\u0131mlar\u0131 neticesinde at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7u i\u015fledi\u011fi iddia edilmi\u015ftir. 4. \u0130ddianamenin kabul\u00fc ile a\u00e7\u0131lan dava, Antalya 9. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesince g\u00f6r\u00fclmeye ba\u015flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu, Antalya 9. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesince (Mahkeme) FET\u00d6\/PDY’ye \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan 7 y\u0131l 6 ay hapis cezas\u0131na mahk\u00fbm edilmi\u015ftir. 5. Ba\u015fvurucunun bu karara kar\u015f\u0131 yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 istinaf kanun yolu ba\u015fvurusu Antalya B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 2. Ceza Dairesinin (Daire) 29\/11\/2018 tarihli karar\u0131yla esastan reddedilmi\u015ftir. An\u0131lan karar ba\u015fvurucu m\u00fcdafine tebli\u011f edilmi\u015ftir. 6. Ba\u015fvurucu, farkl\u0131 tarihlerde yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131 dilek\u00e7eler ile istinaf kanun yolu …","og_url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-31980-basvuru-numarali-karari\/","og_site_name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","article_published_time":"2025-04-24T11:39:00+00:00","author":"Hukuki Haber.net","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u043e":"Hukuki Haber.net","\u041f\u0440\u0438\u0431\u043b. \u0447\u0430\u0441 \u0447\u0438\u0442\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044f":"8 \u0445\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0438\u043d"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-31980-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-31980-basvuru-numarali-karari\/"},"author":{"name":"Hukuki Haber.net","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822"},"headline":"AYM’nin 2020\/31980 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131","datePublished":"2025-04-24T11:39:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-31980-basvuru-numarali-karari\/"},"wordCount":1515,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Hukuki Haberler"],"inLanguage":"uk"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-31980-basvuru-numarali-karari\/","url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-31980-basvuru-numarali-karari\/","name":"AYM'nin 2020\/31980 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-04-24T11:39:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-31980-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"uk","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-31980-basvuru-numarali-karari\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-31980-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"AYM’nin 2020\/31980 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","description":"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"uk"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"uk","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","contentUrl":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","width":1080,"height":1080,"caption":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822","name":"Hukuki Haber.net","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"uk","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Hukuki Haber.net"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net"],"url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/author\/hukukihabernet\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65011","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=65011"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65011\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=65011"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=65011"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=65011"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}