\u0130tiraz Konusu Kurallar<\/p>\n
\u0130tiraz konusu kurallarda, Kamu \u0130hale Kurumuna (Kurum) itirazen \u015fik\u00e2yet ba\u015fvurusunda bulunan ki\u015finin iddialar\u0131n\u0131n tamam\u0131nda hakl\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131 durumda yat\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 ba\u015fvuru bedelinin iade edilmesi \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvuru Gerek\u00e7esi<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvuru karar\u0131nda \u00f6zetle; Kuruma yap\u0131lan itirazen \u015fik\u00e2yet ba\u015fvurular\u0131nda birden fazla iddian\u0131n s\u00f6z konusu oldu\u011fu durumlarda ki\u015filerin baz\u0131 iddialar\u0131nda hakl\u0131 baz\u0131lar\u0131nda da haks\u0131z \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131n\u0131n do\u011fal oldu\u011fu, ba\u015fvuru bedelinin baz\u0131 iddialar\u0131n haks\u0131z oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle iade edilmemesinin m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131yla ba\u011fda\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ba\u015fvurusunda k\u0131smen hakl\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kan ki\u015fi ile tamamen haks\u0131z \u00e7\u0131kan ki\u015finin ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde de\u011ferlendirildi\u011fi belirtilerek kurallar\u0131n Anayasa\u2019ya ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
Mahkemenin De\u011ferlendirmesi<\/p>\n
Ki\u015finin ihale s\u00fcrecine y\u00f6nelik olarak ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc iddialar\u0131n yersiz olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bu iddialar\u0131 inceleyen makam\u0131n de\u011ferlendirmesi sonucu netlik kazanabilecek bir husustur. Ayr\u0131ca \u00f6ne s\u00fcr\u00fclen ve yersiz oldu\u011fu kabul edilen t\u00fcm iddialar\u0131n k\u00f6t\u00fc niyetli bir \u015fekilde ileri s\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn s\u00f6ylenmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. Bir ba\u015fka ifadeyle ki\u015finin do\u011frulu\u011funa inand\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir iddiay\u0131 inceleyen makam\u0131n bu iddiay\u0131 yersiz kabul ederek reddetmesi ola\u011fand\u0131r.\u00a0<\/p>\n
4734 say\u0131l\u0131 Kamu \u0130hale Kanunu\u2019nun 54. maddesinde itirazen \u015fik\u00e2yet ba\u015fvurusu, dava a\u00e7\u0131lmadan \u00f6nce t\u00fcketilmesi zorunlu idari ba\u015fvuru yolu olarak \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ba\u015fvuru sahibinin bu yolu t\u00fcketmeden dava a\u00e7mas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. Zorunlu ba\u015fvuru yolunda ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen iddialar\u0131n\u0131n bir k\u0131sm\u0131nda hakl\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kan ba\u015fvuru sahibine itiraz konusu kurallar uyar\u0131nca ba\u015fvuru bedelinden herhangi bir iade yap\u0131lmayacakt\u0131r. Bununla birlikte ba\u015fvuru sahibinin iddialar\u0131n\u0131n en az\u0131ndan bir k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n Kurum taraf\u0131ndan hakl\u0131 bulunmas\u0131n\u0131n, ihaleyi yapan idarenin ihale s\u00fcrecindeki baz\u0131 i\u015flemlerinin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funun kabul\u00fc anlam\u0131na gelece\u011fi de a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. Bu durumda kurallar gere\u011fi idarenin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 i\u015fleminin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 ki\u015filere k\u00fclfet y\u00fcklemesi ise ka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131lmaz olacakt\u0131r. Ki\u015finin Kuruma yat\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 bedeli ihaleyi yapan idareye kar\u015f\u0131 a\u00e7aca\u011f\u0131 ayr\u0131 bir dava ile idareden isteyebilece\u011fi s\u00f6ylenebilse dahi ayr\u0131 bir davaya zorlan\u0131yor olmas\u0131 yeni bir k\u00fclfet olarak nitelendirilebilecektir.<\/p>\n
Bu itibarla ba\u015fvuru sahibinin \u015fik\u00e2yet ba\u015fvurusunda hakl\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddialar\u0131 dikkate al\u0131nmaks\u0131z\u0131n iddialar\u0131n\u0131n tamam\u0131nda hakl\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131 durumunda ba\u015fvuru bedelinin iade edilmesini \u00f6ng\u00f6ren kurallar\u0131n ki\u015filere a\u015f\u0131r\u0131 bir k\u00fclfet y\u00fckledi\u011fi, kamu yarar\u0131 ile m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131 aras\u0131nda g\u00f6zetilmesi gereken adil dengeyi ki\u015fi aleyhine bozarak orant\u0131s\u0131z bir\u00a0s\u0131n\u0131rlamaya neden oldu\u011fu sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Anayasa Mahkemesi a\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle kurallar\u0131n Anayasa\u2019ya ayk\u0131r\u0131 olduklar\u0131na ve iptallerine karar vermi\u015ftir.\u00a0<\/p>\n
—<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 KARARI<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Esas Say\u0131s\u0131 : 2024\/85<\/p>\n
Karar Say\u0131s\u0131 : 2024\/229<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi : 25\/12\/2024<\/p>\n
R.G. Tarih \u2013 Say\u0131 : 26\/3\/2025 – 32853<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130T\u0130RAZ YOLUNA BA\u015eVURAN: Ankara 7. \u0130dare Mahkemesi<\/p>\n
\u0130T\u0130RAZIN KONUSU: 4\/1\/2002 tarihli ve 4734 say\u0131l\u0131 Kamu \u0130hale Kanunu\u2019nun 53. maddesinin (j) f\u0131kras\u0131na 16\/11\/2022 tarihli ve 7421 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 11. maddesiyle eklenen d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc paragraf\u0131n birinci ve \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc c\u00fcmlelerinin Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 10. ve 35. maddelerine ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclerek iptallerine karar verilmesi talebidir.<\/p>\n
OLAY: Kamu \u0130hale Kurumuna (Kurum) yap\u0131lan itirazen \u015fik\u00e2yet ba\u015fvurusu sonucu ihalenin iptaline karar verilmesine ra\u011fmen itirazen \u015fik\u00e2yet ba\u015fvuru bedelinin iade edilmemesine ili\u015fkin olarak tesis edilen i\u015flemin iptali istemiyle a\u00e7\u0131lan davada itiraz konusu kurallar\u0131n Anayasa\u2019ya ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu kan\u0131s\u0131na varan Mahkeme, iptalleri i\u00e7in ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
I. \u0130PTAL\u0130 \u0130STENEN VE \u0130LG\u0130L\u0130 G\u00d6R\u00dcLEN KANUN H\u00dcK\u00dcMLER\u0130<\/p>\n
A. \u0130ptali \u0130stenen Kanun H\u00fck\u00fcmleri<\/p>\n
Kanun\u2019un itiraz konusu kurallar\u0131n da yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 53. maddesinin ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
\u201cKamu \u0130hale Kurumu<\/p>\n
\u00a0Madde 53-\u2026<\/p>\n
\u00a0\u2026<\/p>\n
\u00a0c) (De\u011fi\u015fik birinci paragraf: 2\/7\/2018-KHK-703\/171 md.) Kurumun karar organ\u0131 biri ba\u015fkan, biri ikinci ba\u015fkan olmak \u00fczere en az d\u00f6rt y\u0131ll\u0131k \u00f6\u011frenim g\u00f6renler aras\u0131ndan Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131nca atanan dokuz \u00fcyeden olu\u015fan Kamu \u0130hale Kuruludur. Kurul Ba\u015fkan\u0131, Kurumun da ba\u015fkan\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
\u2026<\/p>\n
j) Kurumun gelirleri a\u015fa\u011f\u0131da belirtilmi\u015ftir:<\/p>\n
\u2026<\/p>\n
2) (De\u011fi\u015fik: 6\/2\/2014-6518\/49 md.) Yakla\u015f\u0131k maliyeti be\u015f y\u00fcz bin T\u00fcrk Liras\u0131na kadar olan ihalelerde \u00fc\u00e7 bin T\u00fcrk Liras\u0131, be\u015f y\u00fcz bin T\u00fcrk Liras\u0131ndan iki milyon T\u00fcrk Liras\u0131na kadar olanlarda alt\u0131 bin T\u00fcrk Liras\u0131, iki milyon T\u00fcrk Liras\u0131ndan on be\u015f milyon T\u00fcrk Liras\u0131na kadar olanlarda dokuz bin T\u00fcrk Liras\u0131, on be\u015f milyon T\u00fcrk Liras\u0131 ve \u00fczerinde olanlarda on iki bin T\u00fcrk Liras\u0131 tutar\u0131ndaki itirazen \u015fik\u00e2yet ba\u015fvuru bedeli.<\/p>\n
\u2026<\/p>\n
(Ek paragraf:16\/11\/2022-7421\/11 md.) Ba\u015fvuru sahibinin iddialar\u0131n\u0131n tamam\u0131nda hakl\u0131 bulunmas\u0131 halinde, Kurul karar\u0131 ile itirazen \u015fik\u00e2yet ba\u015fvuru bedelinin ba\u015fvuru sahibine iadesine karar verilir. Kurul karar\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvuru sahibine bildirimini izleyen otuz g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde ba\u015fvuru sahibinin Kuruma yaz\u0131l\u0131 talebi \u00fczerine, bu talep tarihini izleyen otuz g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde Kurum taraf\u0131ndan itirazen \u015fik\u00e2yet ba\u015fvuru bedelinin iadesi yap\u0131l\u0131r ve son \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in faiz i\u015flemez. Di\u011fer hallerde ba\u015fvuru bedeli iade edilmez.<\/p>\n
\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n
B. \u0130lgili G\u00f6r\u00fclen Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fc<\/p>\n
Kanun\u2019un ge\u00e7ici 21. maddesi \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
\u201cGe\u00e7ici Madde 21- (Ek:16\/11\/2022-7421\/13 md.)<\/p>\n
Bu maddenin y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6nce al\u0131nan ve 53 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddenin (j) f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc paragraf\u0131ndaki ko\u015fullar\u0131 sa\u011flayan Kurul kararlar\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak bu maddenin y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girdi\u011fi tarihi izleyen otuz g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde itirazen \u015fikayet ba\u015fvuru bedelinin iadesine y\u00f6nelik ba\u015fvuru sahibi taraf\u0131ndan Kuruma yaz\u0131l\u0131 talepte bulunulmas\u0131 durumunda 53 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddenin (j) f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc paragraf\u0131ndaki h\u00fck\u00fcm uygulan\u0131r. Kurul karar\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvuru sahibine bildirildi\u011fi tarih ile itirazen \u015fikayet ba\u015fvuru bedelinin iadesine y\u00f6nelik Kuruma yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvuru tarihi aras\u0131ndaki s\u00fcre i\u00e7in faiz i\u015flemez. Di\u011fer hallerde ba\u015fvuru bedeli iade edilmez.\u201d<\/p>\n
II. \u0130LK \u0130NCELEME<\/p>\n
1. Anayasa Mahkemesi \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uyar\u0131nca Kadir \u00d6ZKAYA, Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN, Basri BA\u011eCI, Engin YILDIRIM, R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7, Recai AKYEL, Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ, Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU, Selahaddin MENTE\u015e, \u0130rfan F\u0130DAN, Kenan YA\u015eAR, Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L ve \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR\u2019\u0131n kat\u0131l\u0131mlar\u0131yla 9\/5\/2024 tarihinde yap\u0131lan ilk inceleme toplant\u0131s\u0131nda dosyada eksiklik bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan i\u015fin esas\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesine OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
III. ESASIN \u0130NCELENMES\u0130<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvuru karar\u0131 ve ekleri, Raport\u00f6r Cem G\u00dcNDO\u011eDU taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan i\u015fin esas\u0131na ili\u015fkin rapor, itiraz konusu ve ilgili g\u00f6r\u00fclen kanun h\u00fck\u00fcmleri, dayan\u0131lan ve ilgili g\u00f6r\u00fclen Anayasa kurallar\u0131 ve bunlar\u0131n gerek\u00e7eleri ile di\u011fer yasama belgeleri okunup incelendikten sonra gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n
A. Anlam ve Kapsam<\/p>\n
3. Kamu hukukuna tabi olan veya kamunun denetimi alt\u0131nda bulunan ya da kamu kayna\u011f\u0131 kullanan kurum ve kurulu\u015flar\u0131n yapacaklar\u0131 ihalelerde uygulanacak esas ve usuller 4734 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019da d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. An\u0131lan Kanun\u2019un \u201c\u0130halenin karara ba\u011flanmas\u0131 ve onaylanmas\u0131\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 40. maddesinde ise ihalenin ekonomik a\u00e7\u0131dan en avantajl\u0131 teklifi veren isteklinin \u00fczerine b\u0131rak\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 ve ihale komisyonunun gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n\u0131 belirleyerek ihale yetkilisinin onay\u0131na sunulaca\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir. Yine s\u00f6z konusu maddeye g\u00f6re ihale yetkilisi, karar tarihini izleyen en ge\u00e7 be\u015f i\u015f g\u00fcn\u00fc i\u00e7inde ihale karar\u0131n\u0131 onaylayacak veya gerek\u00e7esini a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtmek suretiyle iptal edecektir. \u0130hale, karar\u0131n onaylanmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde ge\u00e7erli; iptal edilmesi durumunda ise h\u00fck\u00fcms\u00fcz say\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n
5. Kanun\u2019un 54. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda da ihale s\u00fcrecindeki hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 i\u015flem veya eylemler nedeniyle bir hak kayb\u0131na veya zarara u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 veya zarara u\u011framas\u0131n\u0131n muhtemel oldu\u011funu iddia eden aday veya istekli ile istekli olabileceklerin, bu Kanun\u2019da belirtilen \u015fekil ve usul kurallar\u0131na uygun olmak \u015fart\u0131yla ihaleyi yapan idareye \u015fik\u00e2yet ve Kuruma itirazen \u015fik\u00e2yet ba\u015fvurusunda bulunabilecekleri ifade edilmi\u015f; ayn\u0131 maddenin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda ise \u015fik\u00e2yet ve itirazen \u015fik\u00e2yet ba\u015fvurular\u0131, dava a\u00e7\u0131lmadan \u00f6nce t\u00fcketilmesi zorunlu idari ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131 olarak g\u00f6sterilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. Yap\u0131lacak itirazen \u015fik\u00e2yet ba\u015fvurular\u0131nda 53. maddenin (j) f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (2) numaral\u0131 bendine g\u00f6re hesaplanan itirazen \u015fik\u00e2yet ba\u015fvuru bedelinin Kuruma \u00f6denmesi gerekmektedir. S\u00f6z konusu f\u0131kra gere\u011fince bu bedel Kurumun gelirlerinden biri olarak kabul edilmektedir.<\/p>\n
7. An\u0131lan f\u0131kran\u0131n d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc paragraf\u0131n\u0131n itiraz konusu birinci c\u00fcmlesinde itirazen \u015fik\u00e2yet ba\u015fvurusunda ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen iddialar\u0131n tamam\u0131nda hakl\u0131 \u00e7\u0131k\u0131lmas\u0131 durumunda ba\u015fvuru bedelinin Kamu \u0130hale Kurulu (Kurul) karar\u0131 ile iade edilece\u011fi, ikinci c\u00fcmlesinde bu iade i\u00e7in Kurul karar\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvuru sahibine bildirimini izleyen otuz g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde ba\u015fvuru sahibinin Kuruma yaz\u0131l\u0131 talepte bulunmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi ve bu talep tarihini izleyen otuz g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde de Kurum taraf\u0131ndan itirazen \u015fik\u00e2yet ba\u015fvuru bedelinin iadesinin yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 ayr\u0131ca son \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in faiz i\u015flemeyece\u011fi, itiraz konusu \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc c\u00fcmlesinde ise ilk iki c\u00fcmlede d\u00fczenlenen durumlar d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda iade yap\u0131lmayaca\u011f\u0131 belirtilmektedir.<\/p>\n
8. Bu itibarla itiraz konusu kurallar uyar\u0131nca Kuruma itirazen \u015fik\u00e2yet ba\u015fvurusunda bulunan ki\u015finin iddialar\u0131n\u0131n tamam\u0131nda hakl\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kmamas\u0131 durumda yat\u0131rm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu ba\u015fvuru bedeli iade edilmeyecektir. Bir ba\u015fka ifadeyle ki\u015finin yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu ba\u015fvuruda ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc iddialar\u0131n tek tek de\u011ferlendirilmesi sonucu bir k\u0131sm\u0131nda hakl\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f ve Kurum taraf\u0131ndan bu do\u011frultuda bir karar verilmi\u015f olsa dahi ba\u015fvuru bedelinin iadesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmayacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n
B. \u0130tiraz\u0131n Gerek\u00e7esi<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fvuru karar\u0131nda \u00f6zetle; Kuruma yap\u0131lan itirazen \u015fik\u00e2yet ba\u015fvurular\u0131nda birden fazla iddian\u0131n s\u00f6z konusu oldu\u011fu durumlarda ki\u015filerin baz\u0131 iddialar\u0131nda hakl\u0131 baz\u0131lar\u0131nda da haks\u0131z \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131n\u0131n do\u011fal oldu\u011fu, ba\u015fvuru bedelinin baz\u0131 iddialar\u0131n haks\u0131z oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle iade edilmemesinin m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131yla ba\u011fda\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ba\u015fvurusunda k\u0131smen hakl\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kan ki\u015fi ile tamamen haks\u0131z \u00e7\u0131kan ki\u015finin ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde de\u011ferlendirildi\u011fi belirtilerek kurallar\u0131n Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 10. ve 35. maddelerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
C. Anayasa\u2019ya Ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k Sorunu<\/p>\n
10. 30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun\u2019un 43. maddesi uyar\u0131nca kurallar, ilgisi nedeniyle Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 13. maddesi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden de incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
11. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 35. maddesinde \u201cHerkes, m\u00fclkiyet ve miras haklar\u0131na sahiptir.\/ Bu haklar, ancak kamu yarar\u0131 amac\u0131yla, kanunla s\u0131n\u0131rlanabilir.\/ M\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 toplum yarar\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 olamaz.\u201d denilmektedir. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n an\u0131lan maddesiyle g\u00fcvenceye ba\u011flanan m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131, ekonomik de\u011fer ifade eden ve parayla de\u011ferlendirilebilen her t\u00fcrl\u00fc mal varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131 kapsamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
12. M\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131, ki\u015fiye ba\u015fkas\u0131n\u0131n hakk\u0131na zarar vermemek ve kanunlar\u0131n \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc s\u0131n\u0131rlamalara uymak ko\u015fuluyla sahibi oldu\u011fu \u015feyi diledi\u011fi gibi kullanma, onun semerelerinden yararlanma ve tasarruf etme imk\u00e2n\u0131 veren bir hakt\u0131r (Mehmet Akdo\u011fan ve di\u011ferleri [1. B.], B. No: 2013\/817, 19\/12\/2013, \u00a7 32). Bu ba\u011flamda malikin m\u00fclk\u00fcn\u00fc kullanma, onun semerelerinden yararlanma ve m\u00fclk\u00fc \u00fczerinde tasarruf etme yetkilerinden herhangi birinin s\u0131n\u0131rlanmas\u0131 veya m\u00fclk\u00fcnden yoksun b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131 m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n s\u0131n\u0131rlanmas\u0131 sonucunu do\u011furur (Recep Tarhan ve Afife Tarhan [1. B.], B. No: 2014\/1546, 2\/2\/2017, \u00a7 53).<\/p>\n
13. Kurallarla, ki\u015filerin ihale s\u00fcrecindeki hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 i\u015flem veya eylemler nedeniyle Kuruma yapt\u0131klar\u0131 itirazen \u015fik\u00e2yet ba\u015fvurusu i\u00e7in yat\u0131rd\u0131klar\u0131 ba\u015fvuru bedelinin ancak iddialar\u0131n\u0131n tamam\u0131nda hakl\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131 durumunda iade edilmesi \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ki\u015filerin iddialar\u0131n\u0131n bir k\u0131sm\u0131nda hakl\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131 durumunda ba\u015fvuru bedelinin iade edilmesi s\u00f6z konusu olmayacakt\u0131r. Bu y\u00f6n\u00fcyle kurallar m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131na y\u00f6nelik bir s\u0131n\u0131rlama niteli\u011findedir.<\/p>\n
14. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 35. maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n ancak kanunla s\u0131n\u0131rlanabilece\u011fi belirtilmek suretiyle m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131na y\u00f6nelik m\u00fcdahalelerin kanunda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmesi gerekti\u011fi ifade edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
15. \u00d6te yandan m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131na s\u0131n\u0131rlama getirilirken temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerin s\u0131n\u0131rlanmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin genel ilkeleri d\u00fczenleyen Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 13. maddesinin de g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurulmas\u0131 gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n
16. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 13. maddesinde \u201cTemel hak ve h\u00fcrriyetler, \u00f6zlerine dokunulmaks\u0131z\u0131n yaln\u0131zca Anayasan\u0131n ilgili maddelerinde belirtilen sebeplere ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak ve ancak kanunla s\u0131n\u0131rlanabilir. Bu s\u0131n\u0131rlamalar, Anayasan\u0131n s\u00f6z\u00fcne ve ruhuna, demokratik toplum d\u00fczeninin ve l\u00e2ik Cumhuriyetin gereklerine ve \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fcl\u00fck ilkesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olamaz.\u201d denilmektedir. Buna g\u00f6re m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131na s\u0131n\u0131rlama getiren d\u00fczenlemelerin kanunla yap\u0131lmas\u0131, Anayasa\u2019da \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen s\u0131n\u0131rlama sebebine uygun olmas\u0131 ve \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fc olmas\u0131 gerekir.<\/p>\n
17. Anayasa Mahkemesinin s\u0131k\u00e7a vurgulad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi temel haklar\u0131 s\u0131n\u0131rlayan kanunun \u015feklen var olmas\u0131 yeterli olmay\u0131p yasal kurallar\u0131n keyf\u00eeli\u011fe izin vermeyecek \u015fekilde belirli, ula\u015f\u0131labilir ve \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclebilir d\u00fczenlemeler niteli\u011finde olmas\u0131 gerekir.<\/p>\n
18. Esasen temel haklar\u0131 s\u0131n\u0131rlayan kanunun bu niteliklere sahip olmas\u0131, Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 2. maddesinde g\u00fcvenceye al\u0131nan hukuk devleti ilkesinin de bir gere\u011fidir. Hukuk devletinin temel unsurlar\u0131ndan olan hukuki belirlilik ilkesi uyar\u0131nca kanuni d\u00fczenlemelerin hem ki\u015filer hem de idare y\u00f6n\u00fcnden herhangi bir duraksamaya ve ku\u015fkuya yer vermeyecek \u015fekilde a\u00e7\u0131k, net, anla\u015f\u0131l\u0131r, uygulanabilir ve nesnel olmas\u0131, ayr\u0131ca kamu otoritelerinin keyf\u00ee uygulamalar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 koruyucu \u00f6nlem i\u00e7ermesi gerekir. Kanunda bulunmas\u0131 gereken bu nitelikler hukuki g\u00fcvenli\u011fin sa\u011flanmas\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan da zorunludur. Zira bu ilke hukuk normlar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclebilir olmas\u0131n\u0131, bireylerin t\u00fcm eylem ve i\u015flemlerinde devlete g\u00fcven duyabilmesini, devletin de yasal d\u00fczenlemelerinde bu g\u00fcven duygusunu zedeleyici y\u00f6ntemlerden ka\u00e7\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131 gerekli k\u0131lar (AYM, E.2015\/41, K.2017\/98, 4\/5\/2017, \u00a7\u00a7 153, 154). Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 13. ve 35. maddelerinde s\u0131n\u0131rlama \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fct\u00fc olarak belirtilen kanunilik, Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 2. maddesinde g\u00fcvenceye al\u0131nan hukuk devleti ilkesi \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda yorumlanmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
19. Kurallarda hangi h\u00e2lde ba\u015fvuru bedelinin iade edilebilece\u011fi herhangi bir teredd\u00fcde yer vermeyecek bi\u00e7imde a\u00e7\u0131k ve net olarak d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde kurallar\u0131n belirli, ula\u015f\u0131labilir ve \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclebilir nitelikte oldu\u011fu ve kanunilik \u015fart\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
20. Di\u011fer yandan Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 13. maddesi uyar\u0131nca temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklere getirilen s\u0131n\u0131rlaman\u0131n Anayasa\u2019da \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen s\u0131n\u0131rlama sebebine uygun olmas\u0131 gerekir. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 35. maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131 ancak kamu yarar\u0131 amac\u0131yla s\u0131n\u0131rlanabilir.<\/p>\n
21. 4734 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 56. maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131na g\u00f6re itirazen \u015fik\u00e2yet ba\u015fvurular\u0131 ilke olarak ba\u015fvuru sahibinin iddialar\u0131 ile idarenin \u015fik\u00e2yet \u00fczerine ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 kararda belirlenen hususlar ve itiraz edilen i\u015flemler bak\u0131m\u0131ndan e\u015fit muamele ilkesinin ihlal edilip edilmedi\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131ndan incelenebilmektedir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla Kurum taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan incelemede ba\u015fvuru sahibinin \u00f6ne s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc iddialar dikkate al\u0131naca\u011f\u0131ndan iddialar\u0131n niteli\u011fi \u00f6nemli h\u00e2le gelmektedir. \u0130tirazen \u015fik\u00e2yet ba\u015fvurusu i\u00e7in al\u0131nan bedelin amac\u0131n\u0131n yersiz ba\u015fvurular\u0131n \u00f6n\u00fcne ge\u00e7mek ve idari s\u00fcrecin etkin bir \u015fekilde i\u015flemesini sa\u011flamak oldu\u011fu g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde (benzer y\u00f6ndeki de\u011ferlendirme i\u00e7in bkz. AYM, E.2009\/9, K.2011\/103, 16\/6\/2011) kurallar gere\u011fince bu bedelin sadece iddialar\u0131n\u0131n tamam\u0131nda hakl\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kana iade edilmesi \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclerek yersiz iddialar ile Kuruma ba\u015fvuru yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6n\u00fcne ge\u00e7ilmesinin ama\u00e7land\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Bu ba\u011flamda yap\u0131lan s\u0131n\u0131rlaman\u0131n kamu yarar\u0131na dayal\u0131 me\u015fru bir amaca y\u00f6nelik oldu\u011fu sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
22. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 13. maddesinde yer alan \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fcl\u00fck ilkesi; elveri\u015flilik, gereklilik ve orant\u0131l\u0131l\u0131k olmak \u00fczere \u00fc\u00e7 alt ilkeden olu\u015fmaktad\u0131r. Elveri\u015flilik \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen s\u0131n\u0131rlaman\u0131n ula\u015f\u0131lmak istenen amac\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirmeye elveri\u015fli olmas\u0131n\u0131, gereklilik ula\u015f\u0131lmak istenen ama\u00e7 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan s\u0131n\u0131rlaman\u0131n zorunlu olmas\u0131n\u0131, di\u011fer bir ifadeyle ayn\u0131 amaca daha hafif bir s\u0131n\u0131rlama ile ula\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmamas\u0131n\u0131, orant\u0131l\u0131l\u0131k ise hakka getirilen s\u0131n\u0131rlama ile ula\u015f\u0131lmak istenen ama\u00e7 aras\u0131nda makul bir dengenin g\u00f6zetilmesi gereklili\u011fini ifade etmektedir (AYM, E.2011\/111, K.2012\/56, 11\/4\/2012; E.2014\/176, K.2015\/53, 27\/5\/2015; E.2016\/13, K.2016\/127, 22\/6\/2016, \u00a7 18; Mehmet Akdo\u011fan ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 38).<\/p>\n
23. Kurum taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan incelemede sadece ba\u015fvuru sahibinin \u00f6ne s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc iddialar dikkate al\u0131naca\u011f\u0131ndan yersiz iddialara yer verilmesinin \u00f6n\u00fcne ge\u00e7ilmesi b\u00f6ylece Kurumun etkin bir \u015fekilde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 amac\u0131na ula\u015fma bak\u0131m\u0131ndan kurallar\u0131n elveri\u015fli ve gerekli bir ara\u00e7 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00f6ylenemez.<\/p>\n
24. Di\u011fer yandan s\u0131n\u0131rlaman\u0131n orant\u0131l\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 da ortaya konulmal\u0131d\u0131r. \u0130dari veya yarg\u0131sal ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131nda yap\u0131lan giderlerin bunlara sebebiyet veren ki\u015fiye -haks\u0131z bulunan tarafa- y\u00fckletilmesi \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fc bir m\u00fcdahale olarak kabul edilebilir. Ancak bireylerin, ilgili s\u00fcrecin sonunda hakl\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kmalar\u0131na ra\u011fmen s\u00f6z konusu idari ba\u015fvuru veya dava sebebiyle yap\u0131lan giderleri y\u00fcklenmeye mahk\u00fbm edilmeleri m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131na yap\u0131lan m\u00fcdahaleyi \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcs\u00fcz k\u0131labilir (Farmasol T\u0131bbi \u00dcr\u00fcnler Sanayi ve Ticaret A.\u015e. (2) [1. B.], B. No: 2017\/37300, 15\/1\/2020, \u00a7 42).<\/p>\n
25. \u00d6ncelikle belirtmek gerekirse ki\u015finin ihale s\u00fcrecine y\u00f6nelik olarak ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc iddialar\u0131n yersiz olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bu iddialar\u0131 inceleyen makam\u0131n de\u011ferlendirmesi sonucu netlik kazanabilecek bir husustur. Ayr\u0131ca \u00f6ne s\u00fcr\u00fclen ve yersiz oldu\u011fu kabul edilen t\u00fcm iddialar\u0131n k\u00f6t\u00fc niyetli bir \u015fekilde ileri s\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn s\u00f6ylenmesi de m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. Bir ba\u015fka ifadeyle ki\u015finin do\u011frulu\u011funa inand\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir iddiay\u0131 inceleyen makam\u0131n bu iddiay\u0131 yersiz kabul ederek reddetmesi ola\u011fand\u0131r.<\/p>\n
26. Kanun\u2019un 54. maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda itirazen \u015fik\u00e2yet ba\u015fvurusu, dava a\u00e7\u0131lmadan \u00f6nce t\u00fcketilmesi zorunlu idari ba\u015fvuru yolu olarak \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden ba\u015fvuru sahibinin bu yolu t\u00fcketmeden dava a\u00e7mas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. Zorunlu ba\u015fvuru yolunda ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen iddialar\u0131n\u0131n bir k\u0131sm\u0131nda dahi hakl\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kan ba\u015fvuru sahibine itiraz konusu kural uyar\u0131nca ba\u015fvuru bedelinden herhangi bir iade yap\u0131lmayacakt\u0131r. Bununla birlikte ba\u015fvuru sahibinin iddialar\u0131n\u0131n en az\u0131ndan bir k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n Kurum taraf\u0131ndan hakl\u0131 bulunmas\u0131n\u0131n, ihaleyi yapan idarenin ihale s\u00fcrecindeki baz\u0131 i\u015flemlerinin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funun kabul\u00fc anlam\u0131na gelece\u011fi de a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. Bu durumda kurallar gere\u011fi idarenin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 i\u015fleminin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 ki\u015filere k\u00fclfet y\u00fcklemesi ise ka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131lmaz olacakt\u0131r. Ki\u015finin Kuruma yat\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 bedeli ihaleyi yapan idareye kar\u015f\u0131 a\u00e7aca\u011f\u0131 ayr\u0131 bir dava ile idareden isteyebilece\u011fi s\u00f6ylenebilse dahi ayr\u0131 bir davaya zorlan\u0131yor olmas\u0131 da yeni bir k\u00fclfet olarak nitelendirilebilecektir (benzer y\u00f6nde de\u011ferlendirme i\u00e7in bkz. Farmasol T\u0131bbi \u00dcr\u00fcnler Sanayi ve Ticaret A.\u015e. (2), \u00a7 49).<\/p>\n
27. Bu itibarla ba\u015fvuru sahibinin \u015fik\u00e2yet ba\u015fvurusunda hakl\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddialar\u0131 dikkate al\u0131nmaks\u0131z\u0131n iddialar\u0131n\u0131n tamam\u0131nda hakl\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131 durumunda ba\u015fvuru bedelinin iade edilmesini \u00f6ng\u00f6ren kurallar\u0131n ki\u015filere a\u015f\u0131r\u0131 bir k\u00fclfet y\u00fckledi\u011fi, kamu yarar\u0131 ile m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131 aras\u0131nda g\u00f6zetilmesi gereken adil dengeyi ki\u015fi aleyhine bozarak orant\u0131s\u0131z bir s\u0131n\u0131rlamaya neden oldu\u011fu sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
28. A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle kurallar Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 13. ve 35. maddelerine ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r. \u0130ptalleri gerekir.<\/p>\n
29. Kurallar Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 13. ve 35. maddelerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclerek iptal edildi\u011finden ayr\u0131ca Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 10. maddesi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden incelenmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
IV. \u0130PTAL\u0130N D\u0130\u011eER KURALLARA EK\u0130S\u0130<\/p>\n
30. 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 43. maddesinin (4) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda kanunun, Cumhurba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 kararnamesinin veya T\u00fcrkiye B\u00fcy\u00fck Millet Meclisi \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc\u2019n\u00fcn belirli kurallar\u0131n\u0131n iptali, di\u011fer kurallar\u0131n\u0131n veya t\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn uygulanmamas\u0131 sonucunu do\u011furuyorsa bunlar\u0131n da Anayasa Mahkemesince iptaline karar verilebilece\u011fi \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir.<\/p>\n
31. 4734 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 53. maddesinin (j) f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc paragraf\u0131n\u0131n birinci ve \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc c\u00fcmlelerinin iptalleri nedeniyle uygulanma imk\u00e2n\u0131 kalmayan an\u0131lan paragraf\u0131n ikinci c\u00fcmlesinin ve ayn\u0131 Kanun\u2019un ge\u00e7ici 21. maddesinin de 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 43. maddesinin (4) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fince iptalleri gerekir.<\/p>\n
V. \u0130PTAL KARARININ Y\u00dcR\u00dcRL\u00dc\u011eE G\u0130RECE\u011e\u0130 G\u00dcN SORUNU<\/p>\n
32. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 153. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda \u201cKanun, Cumhurba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 kararnamesi veya T\u00fcrkiye B\u00fcy\u00fck Millet Meclisi \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ya da bunlar\u0131n h\u00fck\u00fcmleri, iptal kararlar\u0131n\u0131n Resm\u00ee Gazetede yay\u0131mland\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihte y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckten kalkar. Gereken hallerde Anayasa Mahkemesi iptal h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girece\u011fi tarihi ayr\u0131ca kararla\u015ft\u0131rabilir. Bu tarih, karar\u0131n Resm\u00ee Gazetede yay\u0131mland\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00fcnden ba\u015flayarak bir y\u0131l\u0131 ge\u00e7emez.\u201d denilmekte, 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 66. maddesinin (3) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda da bu kural tekrarlanmak suretiyle Anayasa Mahkemesinin gerekli g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc h\u00e2llerde iptal karar\u0131n\u0131n Resm\u00ee Gazete\u2019de yay\u0131mland\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00fcnden ba\u015flayarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girece\u011fi tarihi bir y\u0131l\u0131 ge\u00e7memek \u00fczere ayr\u0131ca kararla\u015ft\u0131rabilece\u011fi belirtilmektedir.<\/p>\n
33. 4734 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 53. maddesinin (j) f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc paragraf\u0131n\u0131n iptal edilmesi nedeniyle do\u011facak hukuksal bo\u015fluk kamu yarar\u0131n\u0131 ihlal edecek nitelikte g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 153. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131 ile 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 66. maddesinin (3) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fince iptal h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin karar\u0131n Resm\u00ee Gazete\u2019de yay\u0131mlanmas\u0131ndan ba\u015flayarak dokuz ay sonra y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmesi uygun g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
VI. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A. 4\/1\/2002 tarihli ve 4734 say\u0131l\u0131 Kamu \u0130hale Kanunu\u2019nun 53. maddesinin (j) f\u0131kras\u0131na 16\/11\/2022 tarihli ve 7421 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 11. maddesiyle eklenen d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc paragraf\u0131n;<\/p>\n
1. Birinci ve \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc c\u00fcmlelerinin Anayasa\u2019ya ayk\u0131r\u0131 olduklar\u0131na ve \u0130PTALLER\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
2. \u0130kinci c\u00fcmlesinin 30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun\u2019un 43. maddesinin (4) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fince \u0130PTAL\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
iptal h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 153. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131 ile 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 66. maddesinin (3) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fince KARARIN RESM\u00ce GAZETE\u2019DE YAYIMLANMASINDAN BA\u015eLAYARAK DOKUZ SONRA Y\u00dcR\u00dcRL\u00dc\u011eE G\u0130RMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
B. 4734 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019a 7421 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 13. maddesiyle eklenen ge\u00e7ici 21. maddenin 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 43. maddesinin (4) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fince \u0130PTAL\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
25\/12\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
Kadir \u00d6ZKAYA<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkanvekili<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkanvekili<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Selahaddin MENTE\u015e<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
\u0130rfan F\u0130DAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Muhterem \u0130NCE<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Metin KIRATLI<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi 25\/12\/2024 tarihinde E.2024\/85 numaral\u0131 dosyada, 4734 say\u0131l\u0131 Kamu \u0130hale Kanunu\u2019nun 53. maddesinin (j) f\u0131kras\u0131na 7421 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 11. maddesiyle eklenen d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc paragraf\u0131n birinci ve \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc c\u00fcmlelerinin Anayasa\u2019ya ayk\u0131r\u0131 olduklar\u0131na ve iptallerine, iptal h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn karar\u0131n Resm\u00ee Gazete\u2019de yay\u0131mlanmas\u0131ndan ba\u015flayarak dokuz ay sonra y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmesine karar vermi\u015ftir.\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\u0130tiraz Konusu Kurallar \u0130tiraz konusu kurallarda, Kamu \u0130hale Kurumuna (Kurum) itirazen \u015fik\u00e2yet ba\u015fvurusunda bulunan ki\u015finin iddialar\u0131n\u0131n tamam\u0131nda hakl\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131 durumda yat\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 ba\u015fvuru bedelinin iade edilmesi \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Ba\u015fvuru Gerek\u00e7esi Ba\u015fvuru karar\u0131nda \u00f6zetle; Kuruma yap\u0131lan itirazen \u015fik\u00e2yet ba\u015fvurular\u0131nda birden fazla iddian\u0131n s\u00f6z konusu oldu\u011fu durumlarda ki\u015filerin baz\u0131 iddialar\u0131nda hakl\u0131 baz\u0131lar\u0131nda da haks\u0131z \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131n\u0131n do\u011fal oldu\u011fu, ba\u015fvuru bedelinin baz\u0131 iddialar\u0131n haks\u0131z oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle iade edilmemesinin m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131yla ba\u011fda\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ba\u015fvurusunda k\u0131smen hakl\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kan ki\u015fi ile tamamen haks\u0131z \u00e7\u0131kan ki\u015finin ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde de\u011ferlendirildi\u011fi belirtilerek kurallar\u0131n Anayasa\u2019ya ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Mahkemenin De\u011ferlendirmesi Ki\u015finin ihale s\u00fcrecine y\u00f6nelik olarak ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc iddialar\u0131n yersiz olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bu iddialar\u0131 inceleyen makam\u0131n de\u011ferlendirmesi sonucu netlik kazanabilecek bir husustur. Ayr\u0131ca \u00f6ne s\u00fcr\u00fclen ve yersiz oldu\u011fu kabul edilen t\u00fcm iddialar\u0131n k\u00f6t\u00fc niyetli bir \u015fekilde ileri s\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn s\u00f6ylenmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. Bir ba\u015fka ifadeyle ki\u015finin do\u011frulu\u011funa inand\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir iddiay\u0131 inceleyen makam\u0131n bu iddiay\u0131 yersiz kabul ederek reddetmesi ola\u011fand\u0131r.\u00a0 4734 say\u0131l\u0131 Kamu \u0130hale Kanunu\u2019nun 54. maddesinde itirazen \u015fik\u00e2yet ba\u015fvurusu, dava a\u00e7\u0131lmadan \u00f6nce t\u00fcketilmesi zorunlu idari ba\u015fvuru yolu olarak \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ba\u015fvuru sahibinin bu yolu t\u00fcketmeden dava a\u00e7mas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. Zorunlu ba\u015fvuru yolunda ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen iddialar\u0131n\u0131n bir k\u0131sm\u0131nda hakl\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kan ba\u015fvuru sahibine itiraz konusu kurallar uyar\u0131nca ba\u015fvuru bedelinden herhangi bir iade yap\u0131lmayacakt\u0131r. Bununla birlikte ba\u015fvuru sahibinin …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-37101","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n