T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
SUAT ELMAS BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/40396)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 27\/11\/2024<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
R\u0131dvan DEM\u0130R<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Suat ELMAS<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Batuhan ULUERG\u00dcVEN<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, kolluk g\u00f6revlilerince fiziksel \u015fiddet uygulanmas\u0131 ve bu olay hakk\u0131nda etkili bir ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmemesi nedeniyle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Sultangazi \u0130l\u00e7e Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc G\u00fcvenlik B\u00fcro Amirli\u011fine ba\u011fl\u0131 ekipler, ba\u015fvurucu ile yan\u0131ndaki iki ki\u015finin (Bu ki\u015filerden biri ba\u015fvurucunun yak\u0131n\u0131 O.E., di\u011feri ise O.E.nin arkada\u015f\u0131 M.S.dir.) i\u00e7inde bulundu\u011fu arac\u0131 \u015f\u00fcpheli bularak 17\/1\/2019 tarihinde saat 14.15 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda durdurmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
3. Kolluk g\u00f6revlilerince olay g\u00fcn\u00fc saat 17.00\u2019de d\u00fczenlenen tutana\u011fa g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucu, arac\u0131 durduran kolluk g\u00f6revlilerini tehdit edip g\u00f6revlilere kendisine g\u00fc\u00e7lerinin yetmeyece\u011fini ancak \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 \u00f6ld\u00fcrebileceklerini beyan etmi\u015f; kimli\u011fi istenmesine ra\u011fmen kimli\u011fini ibraz etmemi\u015ftir. Kimli\u011finin tespit edilebilmesi, g\u00f6revli memura hakaret ve tehdit su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan yasal i\u015flemlerin yap\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in ba\u015fvurucu, emniyet arac\u0131na davet edilmi\u015ftir. Direnmesi ve polislere sald\u0131rmas\u0131 nedeniyle kendisine orant\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131lan ba\u015fvurucu, kelep\u00e7elenerek araca bindirilmi\u015f; ayr\u0131ca bu duruma kar\u015f\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kan di\u011fer iki ki\u015fi hakk\u0131nda da ayn\u0131 i\u015flem yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu ile yan\u0131ndaki iki ki\u015fi, adli muayene raporlar\u0131n\u0131n al\u0131nmas\u0131ndan sonra Sultangazi \u015eehit B\u00fclent \u00d6zkan Polis Merkezi Amirli\u011fine (Polis Merkezi) g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
4. Ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda Haseki E\u011fitim ve Ara\u015ft\u0131rma Hastanesince (Haseki Hastanesi) d\u00fczenlenen17\/1\/2019 tarihli adli muayene raporunda; sol g\u00f6zde \u015fi\u015flik, burunda laserasyon ve \u015fi\u015flik, sol kolda \u015fi\u015flik, sol \u00fcst bacakta \u015fi\u015flik, sol kulakta k\u0131zar\u0131kl\u0131k, dudak i\u00e7inde laserasyon, sol \u015fakakta k\u0131zar\u0131kl\u0131k ve morluklar tarif edilmi\u015ftir. Rapora g\u00f6re \u00e7ekilen lateral nazal grafide nazal kemikte fiss\u00fcr g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr ve yaran\u0131n niteli\u011fi konusunda ileri tetkikler gerekmektedir. Haseki Hastanesi ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn, ba\u015fvurucunun sald\u0131r\u0131s\u0131na u\u011frad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 belirten polis memurlar\u0131 hakk\u0131nda da adli muayene raporu d\u00fczenlemi\u015ftir. B.\u00c7. hakk\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen raporda boyun ve ensede pete\u015fi tarz\u0131 k\u0131zar\u0131kl\u0131k, M.A. hakk\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen raporda boyunda pete\u015fi tarz\u0131 k\u0131zar\u0131kl\u0131k, M.K. hakk\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen raporda ise sa\u011f el tenar b\u00f6lgede \u015fi\u015flik ve a\u011fr\u0131, sol el 3. ve 5. parmakta kesi oldu\u011fu a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Raporlarda muayenelerin saati belirtilmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Kolluk g\u00f6revlileri; ba\u015fvurucu ile birlikte g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nan iki ki\u015finin \u015f\u00fcpheli s\u0131fat\u0131yla, yaralanan polis memurlar\u0131n\u0131n ise m\u00fc\u015fteki s\u0131fat\u0131yla ifadelerini alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. O.E ve M.S.nin beyanlar\u0131na g\u00f6re Polis Merkezinde ba\u015fvurucu, kendilerinden farkl\u0131 bir yere g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr ve minib\u00fcse bindi\u011finde ba\u015fvurucunun sadece duda\u011f\u0131\/a\u011fz\u0131 kanamaktad\u0131r. Bununla birlikte an\u0131lan ki\u015filer, adli muayene i\u00e7in ne zaman Haseki Hastanesine g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fcklerine ili\u015fkin bir beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
6. Ba\u015fvurucu 18\/1\/2019 tarihinde Haseki Hastanesinde bir dizi muayeneden ge\u00e7irilmi\u015ftir. Bu muayeneler nedeniyle d\u00fczenlenen t\u0131bbi belgelerde “bilaterl el bileklerinde abrazyonlar, boyun \u00f6n y\u00fczde ve sa\u011f omuzda abrazyon, nazal dorsumda ekimoz ve abrazyon, sol periorbital ekimoz oldu\u011fu, sol uylukta \u015fi\u015flik ve hassasiyet, sol antekubital b\u00f6lgede hassasiyet oldu\u011fu, \u00fcroloji muayenesinde sol epididim ekspanse ve heterojen g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcmde, hafif \u00f6demli (travmaya sekonder kont\u00fczyon?), vask\u00fcleritesi tabii, \u00fcrolojik acil bir giri\u015fim \u00f6nerilmedi\u011fi, g\u00f6z muayenesindesol alt g\u00f6z kapa\u011f\u0131nda \u00f6dem ve ekimoz, her iki glob intakt, g\u00f6z hareketleri do\u011fal, g\u00f6rme keskinli\u011fi her iki g\u00f6zde tam, biyomikroskobik muayenede her iki g\u00f6zde \u00f6n segment do\u011fal, fundoskopik muayenede se\u00e7ilebilen alanlar do\u011fal oldu\u011fu, KBB muayenesinde sa\u011f TM perfore, sol TM intakt, sol aurikulada hassasiyet, acil patoloji saptanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u00e7ekilen BT de nazal dorsum hassasiyet oldu\u011fu, krepitasyon al\u0131namad\u0131\u011f\u0131, nazal dorsumda 2cm lik abrazyon oldu\u011fu, sol alt g\u00f6z kapa\u011f\u0131nda \u00f6dem ve ekimoz oldu\u011fu, \u00e7ekilen t\u00fcm bat\u0131n BT de kemik yap\u0131larda acil patoloji izlenmedi\u011fi, orbita BT de sol zigomatik b\u00f6lgede periorbita alanda yumu\u015fak dokuda \u015fi\u015flik oldu\u011fu, skrotal renkli doppler USG de sol epididim ekspanse ve heterojen g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcmde, hafif \u00f6demli (travmaya sekonder kont\u00fczyon ?) vask\u00fcleritesi tabii oldu\u011fu” ifade edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. Polis Merkezinde ifade vermek istemeyen ba\u015fvurucu; Gaziosmanpa\u015fa Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) verdi\u011fi 18\/1\/2019 tarihli ifadesinde, i\u00e7inde bulundu\u011fu arac\u0131n \u00f6n\u00fcn\u00fcn beyaz bir minib\u00fcsle kesildi\u011fini, minib\u00fcsten inen on ki\u015finin kendisi ile yan\u0131ndakileri yere yat\u0131rmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve ellerini arkalar\u0131ndan kelep\u00e7elediklerini, bu ki\u015filerin sonras\u0131nda polis olduklar\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucunun ifadesine g\u00f6re minib\u00fcse bindirilmeden \u00f6nce bir polis memuru kendisine hakaret etmi\u015f ve minib\u00fcs i\u00e7inde birka\u00e7 kez vurmu\u015ftur. Polis Merkezinin ikinci kat\u0131ndaki Ter\u00f6rle M\u00fccadele (TEM) B\u00fcro Amirli\u011fine \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan eden ba\u015fvurucu, yakla\u015f\u0131k on polisin kendisini darbetti\u011fini ve iki saat yerde bekletildi\u011fini iddia etmi\u015ftir. \u0130fade s\u0131ras\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucuya be\u015f polis memurunun foto\u011fraf\u0131 g\u00f6sterilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, foto\u011fraf\u0131 g\u00f6sterilenler aras\u0131nda kendisine hakaret edip minib\u00fcs i\u00e7inde vuran kimse olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ancak kendisini Polis Merkezinde darbeden polisler oldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
8. Ba\u015fvurucu, olay g\u00fcn\u00fc karakolda \u00e7ekildi\u011fini iddia etti\u011fi baz\u0131 foto\u011fraflar\u0131 vekili arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla 21\/1\/2019 tarihinde Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011fa sunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n talebi \u00fczerine Gaziosmanpa\u015fa Adl\u00ee T\u0131p \u015eube M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnce d\u00fczenlenen 1\/3\/2019 tarihli raporda ba\u015fvurucuda meydana gelen yaralanman\u0131n basit t\u0131bbi bir m\u00fcdahale ile giderilebilecek \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde hafif olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
10. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131 m\u00fczekkereyle Polis Merkezinden olaya ili\u015fkin olarak 17\/1\/2019 tarihinde saat 14.00-14.30 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun Polis Merkezine getirildi\u011fi otopark ile i\u00e7eri girdi\u011fi ve bulundu\u011fu yeri g\u00f6ren t\u00fcm g\u00fcvenlik kameralar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerinin, 17\/1\/2019 tarihinde saat 14.00 ile 20.00 aras\u0131nda, Polis Merkezi TEM B\u00fcroya ait kameralar\u0131n g\u00fcvenlik g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerinin g\u00f6nderilmesini istemi\u015ftir. M\u00fczekkereye kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k olarak ba\u015fvurucunun Polis Merkezine getirildi\u011fi saatlere ili\u015fkin kamera kay\u0131tlar\u0131 soru\u015fturma dosyas\u0131na sunulmu\u015f, kay\u0131tlara ili\u015fkin bilirki\u015fi incelemesi yapt\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 20\/5\/2019 tarihli bilirki\u015fi raporuna g\u00f6re 17\/1\/2019 tarihinde kamara saatine g\u00f6re 14.20\u2019de \u00f6nce ba\u015fvurucu ile yan\u0131ndaki iki ki\u015fi, sonra ba\u015fka \u00fc\u00e7 ki\u015fi merdivenlerden \u00fcst kata \u00e7\u0131km\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
11. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, olay tarihinde g\u00f6revli olan polis memurlar\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00e7izelgeleri ile polis memurlar\u0131na ait baz\u0131 foto\u011fraflar\u0131 temin etmi\u015ftir. Bu kapsamda ba\u015fvurucuya 26\/7\/2019 tarihinde tekrar te\u015fhis yapt\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu; te\u015fhis i\u015flemi s\u0131ras\u0131ndaki beyan\u0131nda kamera g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerinde koluna girdi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclen iki polis memurunun odaya girdikten sonra kendisine ilk sald\u0131ran ki\u015filer oldu\u011funu, bunlar ve di\u011fer polis memurlar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan darbedildi\u011fini ve hakarete u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kendisine g\u00f6sterilen “resim 1-2-3-4-5″teki polis memurlar\u0131n\u0131n da hakaret edip darbetti\u011fini, dosyada foto\u011fraflar\u0131 bulunmayan, ba\u015fta amirleri olmak \u00fczere o g\u00fcn TEM \u015eubede g\u00f6revli olan polis memurlar\u0131n\u0131n da ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde muamelede bulundu\u011funu, ayr\u0131ca darbedildikten sonra so\u011fuk ta\u015f \u00fczerinde y\u00fcz\u00fcst\u00fc iki saat yat\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6ne s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. \u0130fade s\u0131ras\u0131nda haz\u0131r bulunan ba\u015fvurucunun vekili, kamera g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerine g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucunun Polis Merkezine sa\u011fl\u0131kl\u0131 \u015fekilde girdi\u011fini iddia etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
12. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k 16\/7\/2020 tarihinde kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karar vermi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n karar\u0131n\u0131n ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“… Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131zca y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturmada, m\u00fc\u015ftekilerin ifadesi, \u015f\u00fcphelilerin ifadeleri, olay yeri kamera kay\u0131tlar\u0131, adli t\u0131p raporlar\u0131 ve dosya m\u00fcndericat\u0131 birlikte de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde, \u015f\u00fcphelilerin Sultangazi \u0130l\u00e7e Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde g\u00f6revli polis memuru olduklar\u0131, 17\/09\/2019 tarihinde g\u00f6revlerini ifa ettikleri esnada Gazimahallesi Okul Caddesi \u00fczerinde siyah renk C… ara\u00e7tan \u015f\u00fcphelendikleri ve araca durmas\u0131 i\u00e7in megafon, siren, \u00e7akar tertibatlar\u0131 kullan\u0131larak durmas\u0131n\u0131n istenildi\u011fi ancak arac\u0131n durmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, arac\u0131n yap\u0131lan takiple \u00f6n\u00fcn\u00fcn kesilerek durduruldu\u011fu arac\u0131n i\u00e7inde bulunan m\u00fc\u015ftekilerin kolluk g\u00f6revi faaliyetini yapan \u015f\u00fcphelilere hakaret ve adli i\u015flem yap\u0131lmas\u0131na engel olmak amac\u0131yla cebir ve tehditte bulunmak suretiyle g\u00f6revlerini yapmaya engel olduklar\u0131, kolluk faaliyeti yapan \u015f\u00fcphelilerin de m\u00fc\u015ftekilere orant\u0131l\u0131 g\u00fc\u00e7 kullanarak muhafaza alt\u0131na ald\u0131klar\u0131, s\u00f6z konusu eylemlerin a\u015fa\u011f\u0131da belirtildi\u011fi gibi g\u00f6revlerinin gerekleri ile uyumlu oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmakla \u2026 kamu ad\u0131na kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verildi.”<\/p>\n
13. Ba\u015fvurucu, s\u00f6z konusu karara itiraz etmi\u015f; itiraz dilek\u00e7esinde g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda tutuldu\u011fu odadan farkl\u0131 bir yere g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn kamera kay\u0131tlar\u0131ndan anla\u015f\u0131labilece\u011fini, kameras\u0131z bir ortama g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn sabit oldu\u011funu, an\u0131lan darp raporlar\u0131n\u0131n \u015f\u00fcphelilerin \u015fiddetine maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6sterdi\u011fini belirtmi\u015f; kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 karar\u0131 verilmesinin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
14. Ba\u015fvurucunun itiraz\u0131n\u0131 de\u011ferlendiren \u0130stanbul 4. Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fi 15\/10\/2020 tarihinde itiraz\u0131 reddetmi\u015ftir. Karar\u0131n ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“… Her ne kadar Gaziosmanpa\u015fa C.Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019n\u0131n … soru\u015fturma say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131nda, m\u00fc\u015fteki \u015f\u00fcpheliler [A.\u00d6., B.\u00c7., M.K., M.A., M.B.] hakk\u0131nda Basit Yaralama su\u00e7undan verilen 16.06.2020 tarihli Ek Kovu\u015fturmaya Yer Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na Dair Karara … itiraz edilmi\u015f ise de; … polis zor kullanma yetkisi kapsam\u0131nda direnmeyi etkisiz k\u0131lmak amac\u0131yla kullanaca\u011f\u0131 ara\u00e7 ve gere\u00e7 ile kullanaca\u011f\u0131 zorun derecesini kendisi takdir ve tayin eder, ancak toplu kuvvet olarak m\u00fcdahale edilen durumlarda bu husus kuvvet amiri taraf\u0131ndan tayin ve tespit edilir, polis kendisine veya ba\u015fkas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik sald\u0131r\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda zor kullanmaya ili\u015fkin ko\u015fullara ba\u011fl\u0131 kalmaks\u0131z\u0131n 5237 Say\u0131l\u0131 TCK nun me\u015fru savunmaya ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcmleri \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde savunmada bulunur denilmekle polis memurlar\u0131na yapt\u0131klar\u0131 g\u00f6revin ifas\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda zor kullanma yetkisi verildi\u011fi, bu hali ile verilen karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esine g\u00f6re yerinde oldu\u011fu ve m\u00fc\u015fteki \u015f\u00fcpheli Suat ELMAS vekilinin itiraz sebeplerinin yerinde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kanaatine var\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan itiraz\u0131n reddine\u2026 [karar verilmi\u015ftir].”<\/p>\n
15. Ba\u015fvurucu, karar\u0131 20\/11\/2020 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra 17\/12\/2020 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
16. Ba\u015fvuruya konu olayda ba\u015fvurucu, M.S. ve O.E. hakk\u0131nda g\u00f6revi yapt\u0131rmamak i\u00e7in direnme su\u00e7undan, ayr\u0131ca ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda kamu g\u00f6revlisine g\u00f6revinden dolay\u0131 hakaret su\u00e7undan kamu davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Gaziosmanpa\u015fa 20. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesince yap\u0131lan kovu\u015fturmada ba\u015fvurucunun her iki su\u00e7tan da s\u00fcreli hapis cezas\u0131yla cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, M.S.nin g\u00f6revi yapt\u0131rmamak i\u00e7in direnme su\u00e7undan s\u00fcreli hapis cezas\u0131yla mahk\u00fbmiyetine ancak h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na, O.E.nin ise isnat edilen su\u00e7tan s\u00fcreli hapis cezas\u0131yla cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir. Yap\u0131lan istinaf ba\u015fvurular\u0131n\u0131 inceleyen \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 10. Ceza Dairesi, kamu g\u00f6revlisine g\u00f6revinden dolay\u0131 hakaret su\u00e7u nedeniyle ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda kurulan h\u00fckme y\u00f6nelik istinaf ba\u015fvurusunu reddetmi\u015f; O.E. hakk\u0131nda kurulan h\u00fckm\u00fcn kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ve O.E.nin beraatine karar vermi\u015f; g\u00f6revi yapt\u0131rmamak i\u00e7in direnme su\u00e7u y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda yeniden h\u00fck\u00fcm kurarak ba\u015fvurucunun s\u00fcreli hapis cezas\u0131yla cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. G\u00f6revi yapt\u0131rmamak i\u00e7in direnme su\u00e7u y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda kurulan h\u00fck\u00fcm kesin niteliktedir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
17. Ba\u015fvurucu; yakalama s\u0131ras\u0131nda, polis arac\u0131nda ve karakolda kolluk g\u00f6revlilerinin fiziksel ve s\u00f6zl\u00fc \u015fiddet niteli\u011findeki fiillerine maruz kalmas\u0131ndan, bu kapsamda y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturma sonunda yaraland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 tespit eden sa\u011fl\u0131k raporunun varl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ra\u011fmen eksik ara\u015ft\u0131rmayla kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verilmesinden ve bu karara kar\u015f\u0131 yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz\u0131n yeterli gerek\u00e7e a\u00e7\u0131klanmadan reddedilmesinden \u015fik\u00e2yet etmi\u015ftir. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde; yap\u0131lacak incelemede Anayasa ve mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin, Anayasa Mahkemesi ve Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesi i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131n\u0131n dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi bildirilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
18. Ba\u015fvurucunun iddialar\u0131 k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
19. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
20. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131 ihlal eder bi\u00e7imde fiziksel ve ruhsal bir sald\u0131r\u0131ya u\u011fran\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair savunulabilir bir iddia varsa bu iddia hakk\u0131nda etkili bir soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmelidir. Yaralama olay\u0131n\u0131n g\u00fc\u00e7 kullanmaya yetkili bir kamu g\u00f6revlisinin kas\u0131tl\u0131 bir eylemi sonucu meydana geldi\u011finin ileri s\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc h\u00e2llerde ivedilikle bir ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 ba\u015flat\u0131lmal\u0131, soru\u015fturma olaya kar\u0131\u015fm\u0131\u015f olanlardan ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z ki\u015filerce y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmeli, soru\u015fturmada olay\u0131 ayd\u0131nlatabilecek ve sorumlular\u0131n belirlenmesini sa\u011flayabilecek b\u00fct\u00fcn deliller toplanmal\u0131d\u0131r. Dahas\u0131 soru\u015fturma s\u00fcreci gerekti\u011fi \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde kamu denetimine ve ma\u011fdurun eri\u015fimine a\u00e7\u0131k tutulmal\u0131, soru\u015fturma sonunda \u00e7abuk ve temelden yoksun sonu\u00e7lara dayan\u0131lmamal\u0131 ve kullan\u0131lan g\u00fcc\u00fcn ilgilinin davran\u0131\u015f\u0131 nedeniyle mutlak surette gerekli olan bir g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131m\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k gelip gelmedi\u011fi ve orant\u0131l\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 soru\u015fturma makam\u0131nca de\u011ferlendirilmelidir. Ayr\u0131ca soru\u015fturmada makul bir \u00f6zen ve s\u00fcratle hareket edilmelidir (s\u00f6z\u00fc edilen ilkelerin yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00f6rnek kararlar i\u00e7in bkz. Ali R\u0131za \u00d6zer ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2013\/3924, 6\/1\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 101-103; S.D., B. No: 2013\/3017, 16\/12\/2015,\u00a7\u00a7 111-114; Veli Sa\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k (2), B. No: 2018\/24614, 18\/10\/2022, \u00a7 16).<\/p>\n
21. Ba\u015fvurucu, Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131kta verdi\u011fi ifadesinde polisin olay yerinde kendisini yere yat\u0131rmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131 nedeniyle bindirildi\u011fi minib\u00fcste kendisine birka\u00e7 kez vuruldu\u011funu, Polis Merkezinde polislerce darbedildi\u011fini \u00f6ne s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr (bkz. \u00a7 7). Olay g\u00fcn\u00fc ba\u015fvurucunun yan\u0131nda olan O.E. ve M.S. ise \u015f\u00fcpheli s\u0131fat\u0131yla verdikleri ifadelerde minib\u00fcse bindi\u011finde ba\u015fvurucunun sadece duda\u011f\u0131\/a\u011fz\u0131n\u0131n kanad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve Polis Merkezinde kendilerinden farkl\u0131 bir yere g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc beyan etmi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7 5). Ba\u015fvurucunun 26\/7\/2019 tarihinde Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131kta verdi\u011fi ifade s\u0131ras\u0131nda haz\u0131r bulunan vekili, kamera g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerine g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucunun Polis Merkezine sa\u011fl\u0131kl\u0131 \u015fekilde girdi\u011fini iddia etmi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7 11). Ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda Haseki Hastanesince d\u00fczenlenen 17\/1\/2019 tarihli adli muayene raporunda sol g\u00f6zde \u015fi\u015flik, burunda laserasyon ve \u015fi\u015flik, sol kolda \u015fi\u015flik, sol \u00fcst bacakta \u015fi\u015flik, sol kulakta k\u0131zar\u0131kl\u0131k, dudak i\u00e7inde laserasyon, sol \u015fakakta k\u0131zar\u0131kl\u0131k ve morluklar tarif edilse de rapora muayenenin saati yaz\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu durumda ba\u015fvurucunun Polis Merkezine sa\u011fl\u0131kl\u0131 \u015fekilde girip girmedi\u011finin tespiti i\u00e7in gerekli soru\u015fturma i\u015flemlerini (muayenenin saati konusunda Haseki Hastanesine m\u00fczekkere yazma ve 17\/1\/2019 tarihli tutanakta imzas\u0131 olanlar ile O.E. ve M.S.nin bu konuda ifadelerinin al\u0131nmas\u0131, ba\u015fvurucunun Polis Merkezine girdi\u011finde 17\/1\/2019 tarihli raporda belirtilen bulgular\u0131n ba\u015fvurucunun v\u00fccudunda bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 konusunda gerekirse kamera g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcleri \u00fczerinde bilirki\u015fi incelemesi yapt\u0131rma) yapmas\u0131 gerekmesine ra\u011fmen Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, hi\u00e7bir i\u015flem yapmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Oysa ba\u015fvurucunun sa\u011fl\u0131kl\u0131 \u015fekilde Polis Merkezine girdi\u011finin saptanmas\u0131 durumunda ba\u015fvurucuda meydana gelen yaralanma, g\u00f6revlerini yapmalar\u0131na engel olmak i\u00e7in polis memurlar\u0131na olay yerinde direnmesinin sonucu olamaz.<\/p>\n
22. Haseki Hastanesince 18\/1\/2019 tarihinde d\u00fczenlenen adli muayene raporu 17\/1\/2019 tarihli adli muayene raporundan farkl\u0131d\u0131r ve ek bulgular i\u00e7ermektedir. Buna ra\u011fmen Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, sonraki raporda yer alan bulgular\u0131n kayna\u011f\u0131 ve bu bulgulara neden olan eylemlerin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fme zaman\u0131 konusunda yeni bir rapor almam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ayr\u0131ca Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, foto\u011fraflar\u0131ndan te\u015fhis edilen polis memurlar\u0131 ile temin edilen \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00e7izelgesine g\u00f6re \u015f\u00fcpheli olabilecek polislerin ifadelerine ba\u015fvurmam\u0131\u015f; saat 14.00-20.00 aras\u0131ndaki TEM B\u00fcro kamera g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcleri g\u00f6nderilmemesine ra\u011fmen g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerin temini noktas\u0131nda ad\u0131m atmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Son olarak Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, sadece yakalama an\u0131nda kullan\u0131lan g\u00fc\u00e7 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden bir inceleme yapm\u0131\u015f; Polis Merkezinde ve polis arac\u0131nda ya\u015fand\u0131\u011f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen olaylar hakk\u0131nda ve 18\/1\/2019 tarihli adli muayene raporundaki ek bulgular y\u00f6n\u00fcnden de\u011ferlendirme yapmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
23. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutunun ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
24. K\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n maddi boyutunun ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131n\u0131n incelenebilmesi i\u00e7in olay\u0131 \u00e7evreleyen maddi ko\u015fullar, inceleme yapmaya olanak verecek \u015fekilde ayd\u0131nlat\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. Olay\u0131n ayd\u0131nlat\u0131lmas\u0131 ise ihlal iddialar\u0131 ile ilgili etkili bir soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmas\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r. Ba\u015fvuruya konu olayda olay\u0131 \u00e7evreleyen ko\u015fullar yeterince ayd\u0131nlat\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bu a\u015famada k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n maddi boyutu y\u00f6n\u00fcnden inceleme yap\u0131lmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M <\/p>\n
25. Ba\u015fvurucu; ihlalin tespit edilmesi, yeniden soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmas\u0131 ve hakkaniyete uygun maddi ve manevi tazminat \u00f6denmesi talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
26. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen ihlalin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamda karar\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi Cumhuriyet ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden soru\u015fturma i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flatmak ve Anayasa Mahkemesini ihlal sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131ran nedenleri gideren, ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere uygun yeni bir karar vermektir (Mehmet Do\u011fan ([GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n
27. Ba\u015fvurucuya manevi zararlar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda net 100.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00f6denmesine karar verilmesi gerekir. Ba\u015fvurucu, maddi zarara ili\u015fkin olarak bilgi\/belge sunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucunun maddi tazminat talebinin reddine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. K\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutunun \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
C. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere Gaziosmanpa\u015fa Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Sor. No: 2019\/3278) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. Ba\u015fvurucuya net 100.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE, tazminata ili\u015fkin di\u011fer taleplerin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. 446,90 TL har\u00e7 ve 30.000 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinden olu\u015fan toplam 30.446,90 TL yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvurucuya \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
F. \u00d6demelerin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
G. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 27\/11\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 27\/11\/2024 tarihli ve 2020\/40396 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 SUAT ELMAS BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/40396) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 27\/11\/2024 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM \u00a0 \u00a0 R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7 \u00a0 \u00a0 Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR Raport\u00f6r : R\u0131dvan DEM\u0130R Ba\u015fvurucu : Suat ELMAS Vekili : Av. Batuhan ULUERG\u00dcVEN \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, kolluk g\u00f6revlilerince fiziksel \u015fiddet uygulanmas\u0131 ve bu olay hakk\u0131nda etkili bir ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmemesi nedeniyle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Sultangazi \u0130l\u00e7e Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc G\u00fcvenlik B\u00fcro Amirli\u011fine ba\u011fl\u0131 ekipler, ba\u015fvurucu ile yan\u0131ndaki iki ki\u015finin (Bu ki\u015filerden biri ba\u015fvurucunun yak\u0131n\u0131 O.E., di\u011feri ise O.E.nin arkada\u015f\u0131 M.S.dir.) i\u00e7inde bulundu\u011fu arac\u0131 \u015f\u00fcpheli bularak 17\/1\/2019 tarihinde saat 14.15 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda durdurmu\u015ftur. 3. Kolluk g\u00f6revlilerince olay g\u00fcn\u00fc saat 17.00\u2019de d\u00fczenlenen tutana\u011fa g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucu, arac\u0131 durduran kolluk g\u00f6revlilerini tehdit edip g\u00f6revlilere kendisine g\u00fc\u00e7lerinin yetmeyece\u011fini ancak \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 \u00f6ld\u00fcrebileceklerini beyan etmi\u015f; kimli\u011fi istenmesine ra\u011fmen kimli\u011fini ibraz etmemi\u015ftir. Kimli\u011finin tespit edilebilmesi, g\u00f6revli memura hakaret ve tehdit su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan yasal i\u015flemlerin yap\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in ba\u015fvurucu, emniyet arac\u0131na davet edilmi\u015ftir. Direnmesi ve polislere sald\u0131rmas\u0131 nedeniyle kendisine orant\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131lan ba\u015fvurucu, kelep\u00e7elenerek araca bindirilmi\u015f; ayr\u0131ca bu duruma kar\u015f\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kan di\u011fer iki ki\u015fi hakk\u0131nda da ayn\u0131 …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-36236","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n