T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130SMA\u0130L KAYA BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/17102)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 27\/11\/2024<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Mustafa Erdem ATLIHAN<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
\u0130smail KAYA<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Emrah \u00c7EL\u0130KTA\u015e<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, kolluk g\u00f6revlisince fiziksel \u015fiddet uygulanmas\u0131 ve bu olay hakk\u0131nda etkili bir ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmemesi nedeniyle insan haysiyetiyle ba\u011fda\u015fmayan muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Kolluk g\u00f6revlilerinin saat 17.00’de d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi ve ba\u015fvurucunun da imzas\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131yan 17\/3\/2021 tarihli tutana\u011fa g\u00f6re Ankara’n\u0131n Alt\u0131nda\u011f il\u00e7esinde bir sokakta \u015f\u00fcphe \u00fczerine durdurulan ticari takside yolcu olarak bulunan ba\u015fvurucu ve yan\u0131ndaki M.K.n\u0131n aranmas\u0131 sonucu M.K.n\u0131n \u00fczerinde bir ruhsats\u0131z tabanca, ba\u015fvurucunun \u00fczerinde de i\u00e7inde yirmi bir mermi bulunan bir po\u015fet ele ge\u00e7irilmi\u015f; yakalanan \u015fah\u0131slar doktor raporu al\u0131nd\u0131ktan sonra i\u015flemlerin yap\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in karakola g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Yine ayn\u0131 tarihi ta\u015f\u0131yan ve iki polis memuru taraf\u0131ndan saat 22.30’da d\u00fczenlenen tutanakta ise i\u015flemleri yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere karakola getirilen ba\u015fvurucunun \u00c7ocuk \u015eube M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne (\u00c7ocuk \u015eube) g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fclmek \u00fczere polis arac\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda “Beni niye \u00e7ocuk \u015fubeye g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcyorsunuz, beni g\u00f6t\u00fcremezsiniz.” \u015feklinde ba\u011f\u0131rmaya ve kendini sa\u011fa sola vurmaya ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131, arac\u0131n kap\u0131lar\u0131na tekme att\u0131\u011f\u0131, sonras\u0131nda yoldayken kendini iyi hissetmedi\u011fini ve kolunun a\u011fr\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6ylemesi \u00fczerine de hastaneye g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fclerek rapor al\u0131nd\u0131ktan sonra \u00c7ocuk \u015eubeye teslim edildi\u011fi kay\u0131t alt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. Olay\u0131n ya\u015fand\u0131\u011f\u0131 karakolun amiri olan Komiser M.G. \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i s\u0131fat\u0131yla al\u0131nan ayn\u0131 tarihli ifadesinde; ba\u015fvurucunun karakoldaki adli i\u015flemler s\u00fcrerken ba\u011f\u0131r\u0131p \u00e7a\u011f\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, sa\u011fa sola k\u00fcfretti\u011fini duymas\u0131 \u00fczerine onu sakinle\u015ftirmek amac\u0131yla yan\u0131na gitti\u011fini, ba\u015fvurucunun hakaret ve tehditlerde bulunarak ona vurmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, v\u00fccudunu sa\u011fa sola vuran ba\u015fvurucunun kendisine zarar vermesini engellemek i\u00e7in ba\u015f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6\u011fs\u00fcne dayad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, omzundan tutarak aya\u011fa kalkmas\u0131na engel oldu\u011funu, ba\u015fvurucuyu g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fckle sakinle\u015ftirdi\u011fini ifade etmi\u015ftir. Komiser M.G. ayr\u0131ca ba\u015fvurucunun kollar\u0131n\u0131 ve boynunu s\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in yaraland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015f, ba\u015fvurucudan \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i olmu\u015ftur. Ankara Gazi Mustafa Kemal Devlet Hastanesinden al\u0131nan 18\/3\/2021 tarihli genel adli muayene raporunda Komiser M.G. hakk\u0131nda “Boyun sol k\u0131sm\u0131nda yayg\u0131n hiperemik alan [kanlanma], her iki kol i\u00e7 k\u0131s\u0131mlarda yayg\u0131n hiperemik alanlar mevcuttur.” tespitine yer verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. Olay\u0131n ya\u015fand\u0131\u011f\u0131 polis merkezinde g\u00f6revli olan polis memuru S.\u00d6. bilgi veren s\u0131fat\u0131yla ayn\u0131 tarihte al\u0131nan ifadesine g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucunun ve yan\u0131ndaki M.K.n\u0131n ifade i\u015flemleri devam ederken, ba\u015fvurucu yerinden kalkarak \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f kap\u0131s\u0131na do\u011fru y\u00f6nelmi\u015ftir. Bunu fark eden S.\u00d6. ba\u015fvurucunun d\u0131\u015far\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131n\u0131 engellemek i\u00e7in yan\u0131na gitmi\u015ftir. Bu s\u0131rada ba\u015fvurucu, polis merkezinin amiri olan M.G.nin odas\u0131na y\u00f6nelerek i\u00e7eriye girmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015fm\u0131\u015f ve ba\u015fvurucuyu kolundan tutarak yerine oturtmu\u015ftur. Bir s\u00fcre sonra y\u00fcksek sesle ba\u011f\u0131rarak tehdit ve hakaretler etmeye ba\u015flayan ba\u015fvurucuyu odas\u0131ndan gelen M.G. sakinle\u015ftirmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015fsa da ba\u015fvurucu, agresif davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131n\u0131 s\u00fcrd\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. \u0130fadesine g\u00f6re S.\u00d6. Bu s\u0131rada gelen anons \u00fczerine olay yerinden ayr\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucunun 18\/3\/2021 tarihinde m\u00fcdafii e\u015fli\u011finde Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131na verdi\u011fi ifadenin ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
” … Se\u011fmenler Polis Merkezine geldi\u011fimizde de kelep\u00e7em s\u0131k\u0131 oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in ‘bunu biraz a\u00e7ar m\u0131s\u0131n\u0131z’ dedi[m]. Karakolun koridorunda bekleme salonundayken bir anda benden \u015fikayet\u00e7i olan karakol amiri beni darp etmeye ba\u015flad\u0131. Kameralarda vard\u0131 ancak ben \u015fikayet\u00e7i de\u011filim. Ben kesinlikle k\u00fcf\u00fcr etmedim, kimseyi tehdit etmedim. Mukavemette bulunmad\u0131m. M\u00fc\u015ftekiyi yaralamad\u0131m. \u00dczerime at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7lamalar\u0131 kabul etmiyorum…”<\/p>\n
6. Ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131ndaki sa\u011fl\u0131k raporlar\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
i. Ankara Gazi Mustafa Kemal Devlet Hastanesinden al\u0131nan 17\/3\/2021 tarihli ve 18.13 saatli genel adli muayene raporunda darp ve cebir izine rastlanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
ii. Ayn\u0131 hastaneden ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn ve saat 20.50’de al\u0131nan adli muayene raporunda “Sa\u011f zigomatik kemik [elmac\u0131k kemi\u011fi] hizas\u0131nda 3×2 cm boyutunda eritem [kan toplanmas\u0131 sonucu derinin k\u0131zarmas\u0131], hassasiyet, \u015fi\u015flik ve frontal kemik [ba\u015f\u0131n \u00fcst k\u0131sm\u0131, g\u00f6zlerin aras\u0131] sol tarafta 2×1 cm boyutunda \u015fi\u015flik, her iki kulak kep\u00e7esinde k\u0131zar\u0131kl\u0131k mevcut, sa\u011f kulakta duymada azalma, boyun sol taraf\u0131nda 3×3 cm boyutunda eritem ve ense sol arka taraf\u0131nda 4×3 cm boyutunda eritemli ekskoriyatif lezyon, her iki bacak pretibial kemik [kaval kemi\u011fi] orta hizas\u0131nda 0,5×0,5 cm boyutunda \u00fclseratif lezyon, sol kol triceps [omuz kas\u0131] hizas\u0131nda 4×5 cm boyutunda endurasyonu artm\u0131\u015f \u015fi\u015flik ve hassasiyet, sol bacak kuadriceps [\u00fcst bacak \u00f6n kas\u0131] d\u0131\u015f hizas\u0131nda 5×10 cm boyutunda \u015fi\u015flik mevcut. Kafa ve boyun travmas\u0131 olmas\u0131 nedeniyle beyin cerrahisi ve kulaktaki \u015fikayeti nedeniyle kulak burun bo\u011faz uzman hekimleri taraf\u0131ndan de\u011ferlendirilmesi ve ilgili hekimlerce raporun tamamlanmas\u0131 uygundur.” tespitlerine yer verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
iii. Adli T\u0131p Kurumu taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen 29\/4\/2021 tarihli raporda ba\u015fvurucunun yaralanmas\u0131n\u0131n ya\u015fam\u0131n\u0131 tehlikeye sokmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve basit t\u0131bbi m\u00fcdahale ile giderilebilir nitelikte oldu\u011fu ifade edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda kamu g\u00f6revlisine kar\u015f\u0131 g\u00f6revinden dolay\u0131 hakaret ve g\u00f6revi yapt\u0131rmamak i\u00e7in direnme su\u00e7undan y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda5\/5\/2021 tarihli Kamera \u0130zleme Tutana\u011f\u0131 soru\u015fturma dosyas\u0131na kazand\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Tutanakta; ba\u015fvurucuyla beraberindeki ki\u015finin karakola getirildi\u011fi ve ba\u015fvurucunun karakol amirinin odas\u0131na girmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 ana ait oldu\u011fu notu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f iki foto\u011frafa ve herhangi bir foto\u011fraf bulunmaks\u0131z\u0131n ba\u015fvurucunun karakol i\u00e7inde yerinde duramayarak sa\u011fa sola gidip geldi\u011fi, g\u00f6revlilere zorluk \u00e7\u0131kard\u0131\u011f\u0131, g\u00f6revlilerin uyar\u0131lar\u0131na ald\u0131r\u0131\u015f etmedi\u011fi, karakol amirinin odas\u0131na girmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, kendisini sakinle\u015ftirmek isteyen komiseri darbetmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015farak yaralanmas\u0131na sebep oldu\u011fu, ba\u015fvurucunun iddia etti\u011fi gibi kendisinin darbedildi\u011fine dair bir g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bilgisine yer verilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k\u00e7a y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturma sonucunda ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda kamu davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeterli \u015f\u00fcphe oldu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fclmekle beraber taraflar\u0131n bir edim \u00f6ng\u00f6rmeksizin uzla\u015fmalar\u0131 nedeniyle kovu\u015fturma yap\u0131lmas\u0131na yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. Hakk\u0131nda 10\/7\/1953 tarihli ve 6136 say\u0131l\u0131 Ate\u015fli Silahlar ve B\u0131\u00e7aklar ile Di\u011fer Aletler Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’a muhalefet etme ve g\u00f6revi yapt\u0131rmamak i\u00e7in direnme su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan tahkikat evrak\u0131 d\u00fczenlenen ba\u015fvurucu i\u00e7in ba\u015flat\u0131lan soru\u015fturmay\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fcten Ankara Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) ba\u015fvurucunun su\u00e7a s\u00fcr\u00fcklenen \u00e7ocuk s\u0131fat\u0131yla verdi\u011fi ifadesinde polis merkezinde karakol amirinin fiziksel \u015fiddetine u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ay\u0131rma karar\u0131 vererek kasten yaralama iddias\u0131n\u0131 ayr\u0131 bir soru\u015fturma numaras\u0131 alt\u0131nda incelemi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k bu kapsamda ba\u015fvurucunun yaralanmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin adli t\u0131p raporunu dosyaya kazand\u0131rm\u0131\u015f ve ba\u015fvurucunun ifadesini alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k 29\/3\/2021 tarihinde 2\/12\/1999 tarihli ve 4483 say\u0131l\u0131 Memurlar ve Di\u011fer Kamu G\u00f6revlilerinin Yarg\u0131lanmas\u0131 Hakk\u0131ndaki Kanun’un 4. maddesinin son f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca evrak\u0131n i\u015fleme konulmamas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. Bu karar kesindir ve Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k bu karar\u0131na gerek\u00e7e olarak yap\u0131lan soru\u015fturma sonunda ma\u011fdurun soyut iddias\u0131ndan ba\u015fka delil elde edilememesini g\u00f6stermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fvurucu vekili taraf\u0131ndan 24\/3\/2021 tarihinde Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011fa verilen \u015fik\u00e2yet dilek\u00e7esi \u00fczerine ayn\u0131 olaya ili\u015fkin yeni bir soru\u015fturma ba\u015flat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u015eik\u00e2yet dilek\u00e7esine g\u00f6re olay tarihinde bir su\u00e7 iddias\u0131yla karakola g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fclen ba\u015fvurucunun karakolda u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131 fiziksel \u015fiddet nedeniyle y\u00fcz\u00fcn\u00fcn sa\u011f taraf\u0131nda \u015fi\u015flik, dudaklar\u0131nda kanama olu\u015fmu\u015ftur. Bir g\u00fcn g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda kalan ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda al\u0131nan sa\u011fl\u0131k raporu ba\u015fvurucunun v\u00fccudundaki darp izlerini belgelemi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu delil olarak karakol kamera g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerine dayanm\u0131\u015f ve dilek\u00e7e ekine, olay g\u00fcn\u00fc ba\u015fvurucunun vekilinin kendi cep telefonu kameras\u0131yla \u00e7ekti\u011fi bir videoyu eklemi\u015f; fiziksel \u015fiddet uygulayan polis memurundan \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i olmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
10. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k bu \u015fik\u00e2yet \u00fczerine ba\u015flat\u0131lan soru\u015fturma i\u00e7in 5\/4\/2021 tarihinde m\u00fckerrer olmas\u0131 nedeniyle 4483 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 4. maddesinin son f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca \u015fik\u00e2yetin i\u015fleme konulmamas\u0131na kesin olarak karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
11. Ba\u015fvurucu, nihai karar\u0131 30\/3\/2021 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra 22\/4\/2021 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
12. \u00d6deme g\u00fcc\u00fcnden yoksun oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurucunun adli yard\u0131m talebinin kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
13. Ba\u015fvurucu, g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc karakolda kolluk g\u00f6revlisinin fiziksel \u015fiddetine maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu olay nedeniyle y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131n\u0131n etkili olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131 ve adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011finden \u015fik\u00e2yet etmi\u015ftir. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karardan ayr\u0131lmak i\u00e7in kuvvetli bir neden bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bildirilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
14. Ba\u015fvuru, k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
15. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
16. G\u00fc\u00e7 kullanmaya yetkili kamu g\u00f6revlilerinin tutumu nedeniyle kendisine kar\u015f\u0131 g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 kesin olarak gerekli olmayan bir ki\u015fiye kar\u015f\u0131 fiziksel g\u00fcce ba\u015fvurmalar\u0131 ilke olarak Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131 ihlal etmektedir. Kesin gerekli oldu\u011fu h\u00e2llerde g\u00fc\u00e7, a\u015f\u0131r\u0131ya ka\u00e7madan kullan\u0131lmal\u0131 ve ki\u015finin tutumuyla orant\u0131l\u0131 olmal\u0131d\u0131r (Ali R\u0131za \u00d6zer ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2013\/3924, 6\/1\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 81, 82). G\u00f6zalt\u0131 veya tutukluluk gibi bireyin devletin kontrol\u00fc alt\u0131nda bulundu\u011fu s\u0131rada bir yaralanma olay\u0131 meydana gelmi\u015fse bu olaya ili\u015fkin tatmin edici ve inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 bir a\u00e7\u0131klama getirme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc yetkili makamlardad\u0131r (S.D., B. No: 2013\/3017, 16\/12\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 89, 90; Cengiz Kahraman ve Kenan \u00d6zy\u00fcrek, B. No: 2013\/8137, 20\/4\/2016, \u00a7 95). Bunun sebebi bu t\u00fcr olaylarda ger\u00e7ekle\u015fme ko\u015fullar\u0131na ili\u015fkin bilgilerin \u00e7o\u011funlukla yetkili makamlar\u0131n eri\u015fiminde olmas\u0131d\u0131r (Ferit Kurt ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2018\/9957, 8\/6\/2021, \u00a7 74).<\/p>\n
17. Ba\u015fvurucu, yap\u0131lan aramada su\u00e7 unsuru olabilecek nitelikteki materyalin (mermi) \u00fczerinde bulunmas\u0131 sebebiyle yakalanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucunun yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00fcn yap\u0131lan ilk adli muayenesinde darp ve cebir izine rastlanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirlenmi\u015fken ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn birka\u00e7 saat sonra yap\u0131lan ikinci adli muayenesinde ise basit t\u0131bbi m\u00fcdahale ile giderilebilir mahiyette birden fazla yaralanma tespit edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
18. Ba\u015fvurucu, karakol amirinin fiziksel \u015fiddetine u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Soru\u015fturma mercii \u015f\u00fcpheli kolluk g\u00f6revlisi hakk\u0131nda isnat edilen eylemin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fine ili\u015fkin olarak ba\u015fvurucunun soyut iddias\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda delil bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle i\u015fleme konmama karar\u0131 vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
19. Ba\u015fvurucunun devletin kontrol\u00fc alt\u0131nda bulundu\u011fu s\u0131rada meydana gelen yaralanmas\u0131n\u0131n -doktor raporuyla belirlenmi\u015ftir- nas\u0131l olu\u015ftu\u011funu a\u00e7\u0131klama y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kamu makamlar\u0131na aittir. Buna ra\u011fmen ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131nda Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k\u00e7a bu yaralanmaya ili\u015fkin herhangi bir a\u00e7\u0131klama ya da de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n ba\u015fvurucunun soyut iddias\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda bir delil bulunamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle sonuca gidildi\u011finden devletin Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesi kapsam\u0131nda negatif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ayk\u0131r\u0131 davran\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (benzer y\u00f6ndeki de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7in bkz. Ya\u015far Cesur Kelkit, B. No: 2020\/442, 24\/5\/2023, \u00a7 42).<\/p>\n
20. Bu tespitlerden sonra kolluk g\u00f6revlisinin ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi eylemin hangi boyuta ula\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmelidir. Somut olay bir b\u00fct\u00fcn olarak ele al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda eylemin insan haysiyetiyle ba\u011fda\u015fmayan muamele olarak nitelendirilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
21. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesi -\u201cDevletin temel ama\u00e7 ve g\u00f6revleri\u201d kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 5. maddesindeki genel y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckle birlikte yorumland\u0131\u011f\u0131nda- bir kimsenin devlet g\u00f6revlilerinin 17. maddenin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131 ihlal eden bir muamelesine u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin savunulabilir bir iddiada bulunmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde etkili bir soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesini gerektirir. K\u00f6t\u00fc muamelenin kasten yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ileri s\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc durumlarda iddia hakk\u0131nda ivedilikle bir ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 ba\u015flat\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. \u015eik\u00e2yet olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131nda bile ki\u015fiye k\u00f6t\u00fc muamelede bulunuldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin yeterince a\u00e7\u0131k belirtiler varsa konuyla ilgili bir ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. Soru\u015fturmada olay\u0131 ayd\u0131nlatabilecek ve sorumlular\u0131n belirlenmesini sa\u011flayabilecek t\u00fcm deliller toplanmal\u0131d\u0131r. Dahas\u0131 soru\u015fturma s\u00fcreci, gerekti\u011fi \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde kamu denetimine ve ma\u011fdurun eri\u015fimine a\u00e7\u0131k olmal\u0131; ma\u011fdur soru\u015fturmaya etkili \u015fekilde kat\u0131labilmeli, soru\u015fturmada makul bir \u00f6zen ve s\u00fcratle hareket edilmelidir. Ayr\u0131ca yetkililer, soru\u015fturmay\u0131 sonland\u0131rmak i\u00e7in aceleci davranmamal\u0131 ve temelden yoksun sonu\u00e7lara dayanmamal\u0131d\u0131r (Ali R\u0131za \u00d6zer ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7\u00a7 101-103; S.D.,\u00a7\u00a7 111-114; Veli Sa\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k (2), B. No: 2018\/24614, 18\/10\/2022, \u00a7 16).<\/p>\n
22. Ba\u015fvurucu, olay yeri ve zaman\u0131n\u0131 belirterek maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia etti\u011fi muameleyi ifadesinde dile getirmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca olay g\u00fcn\u00fc d\u00fczenlenen ve ba\u015fvurucuda meydana gelen yaralanmay\u0131 tespit eden adli muayene raporu da soru\u015fturma dosyas\u0131na girmi\u015ftir. K\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131 hususunda savunulabilir bir iddia mevcut ise etkili soru\u015fturma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden s\u00f6z edilebilecektir.<\/p>\n
23. Ba\u015fvurucu, y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturman\u0131n etkili ve yeterli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
24. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen ilk soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun sundu\u011fu sa\u011fl\u0131k raporuna g\u00f6re yaralanmas\u0131n\u0131n niteli\u011finin belirlenmesi amac\u0131yla Adli T\u0131p raporu al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Soru\u015fturma neticesinde \u015f\u00fcpheli kolluk g\u00f6revlisi hakk\u0131nda isnat edilen eylemlerin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fine dair delil bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na kanaat getirilerek dosyan\u0131n i\u015fleme konulmamas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015f (bkz. \u00a7 8), \u015fik\u00e2yet \u00fczerine ba\u015flat\u0131lan ikinci soru\u015fturmada ise bu ilk soru\u015fturman\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131na i\u015faret edilerek m\u00fckerrerlik gerek\u00e7esiyle ayn\u0131 sonuca ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (bkz. \u00a7 10).<\/p>\n
25. Soru\u015fturma merciinin kolluk ihbar evrak\u0131 ekinde \u015f\u00fcpheli kolluk g\u00f6revlisi M.G.nin olay\u0131n ba\u015fvurucunun karakol i\u00e7inde ba\u011f\u0131r\u0131p \u00e7a\u011f\u0131rmas\u0131 \u00fczerine etraf\u0131na veya kendisine zarar vermesini engellemek i\u00e7in yan\u0131na gitti\u011finde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi, ba\u015fvurucunun da onu yaralad\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde beyanlar\u0131 bulunmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen olay\u0131n nas\u0131l ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde herhangi bir ara\u015ft\u0131rma yapmaks\u0131z\u0131n iddialar\u0131 destekleyen delil bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle sonuca ula\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k\u00e7a ba\u015fvurucunun olay g\u00fcn\u00fc yaraland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 destekleyen adli muayene raporu dikkate al\u0131narak, \u015f\u00fcpheli ile olay tan\u0131klar\u0131 da dinlenmek suretiyle ba\u015fvurucu g\u00f6zalt\u0131ndayken meydana gelen yaralanman\u0131n sebebinin ve bundan devlet g\u00f6revlilerinin sorumlu olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n nesnel verilerle makul \u015fekilde a\u00e7\u0131klanmamas\u0131 ve \u015f\u00fcphelinin olay\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fme \u015fekline ili\u015fkin ifadesinin meydana getirdi\u011fi \u00e7eli\u015fki tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n sonuca ula\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 etkin bir soru\u015fturma yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususunda teredd\u00fct olu\u015fmu\u015f, adli s\u00fcrecin mutlaka bir dava a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 ya da a\u00e7\u0131lan davan\u0131n belli bir h\u00fck\u00fcmle sonu\u00e7lanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi anlam\u0131na gelmemekle birlikte ba\u015fvurucuya kar\u015f\u0131 k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele olu\u015fturdu\u011fu iddia edilen eylemlere y\u00f6nelik olarak olay\u0131n ayd\u0131nlat\u0131lmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla etkili bir ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmedi\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
26. Bununla birlikte \u015fik\u00e2yete konu eylemin 4483 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun kapsam\u0131nda kalan su\u00e7lar aras\u0131nda olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespit edilmesi soru\u015fturma yapma yetkisinin do\u011frudan Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131nda oldu\u011fu anlam\u0131na gelecek ve derh\u00e2l soru\u015fturma i\u015flemlerine ba\u015flanarak delillerin toplanmas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde \u00f6nem arz edecektir. 4483 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun kapsam\u0131na girmeyen bir su\u00e7 ya da ki\u015fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden an\u0131lan Kanun\u2019un i\u015fletilmesi etkili soru\u015fturma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc y\u00f6n\u00fcnden sorun te\u015fkil edecektir. Bu nedenle \u015fik\u00e2yete konu fiil ve failin 4483 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun kapsam\u0131nda kal\u0131p kalmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 titizlikle incelenmelidir (\u00dcmm\u00fchan Se\u00e7il Sucu, B. No: 2017\/15128, 19\/11\/2020, \u00a7 74; Erdal Sar\u0131kaya, \u00a7 124).<\/p>\n
27. K\u00f6t\u00fc muamele iddias\u0131n\u0131n makul \u015f\u00fcphe uyand\u0131racak d\u00fczeyde oldu\u011funu g\u00f6steren doktor raporlar\u0131, polis memurlar\u0131n\u0131n e\u015fk\u00e2llerine kadar varan anlat\u0131mlar ve tan\u0131k gibi bir\u00e7ok delil g\u00f6sterilmesine kar\u015f\u0131n iddialar\u0131n soyut ve genel nitelikte g\u00f6r\u00fclerek dilek\u00e7enin i\u015fleme konulmamas\u0131n\u0131n sorumlular\u0131n ve olay\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fme ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n ortaya \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 olanaks\u0131z hale getirdi\u011fi ve etkili bir ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesi \u00f6n\u00fcnde engel te\u015fkil etti\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r.<\/p>\n
28. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan insan haysiyetiyle ba\u011fda\u015fmayan muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n maddi ve usul boyutunun ihlal edildi\u011fi sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M<\/p>\n
29. Ba\u015fvurucu; ihlalin tespit edilmesi, yeniden soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmas\u0131 ve 50.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00f6denmesi talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
30. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen, kamu makamlar\u0131n\u0131n eylemlerinden ve soru\u015fturma merciinin kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karar\u0131ndan kaynaklanan hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamda karar\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi Cumhuriyet ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n yapmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden soru\u015fturma i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flatmak ve Anayasa Mahkemesini ihlal sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131ran nedenleri gideren, ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere uygun yeni bir karar vermektir (Mehmet Do\u011fan ([GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n
31. \u0130hlalin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n b\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcyle ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in ba\u015fvurucuya manevi zararlar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda talebi dikkate al\u0131narak net 50.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00f6denmesine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Adli yard\u0131m talebinin KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n
B. \u0130nsan haysiyetiyle ba\u011fda\u015fmayan muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
C. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan insan haysiyetiyle ba\u011fda\u015fmayan muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n maddi ve usul boyutunun \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin insan haysiyetiyle ba\u011fda\u015fmayan muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere Ankara Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Sor. No: 2021\/63956) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. Ba\u015fvurucuya net 50.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
F. 30.000 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinden olu\u015fan yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvurucuya \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
G. \u00d6demelerin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
H. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 27\/11\/2024tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 27\/11\/2024 tarihli ve 2021\/17102 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u0130SMA\u0130L KAYA BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/17102) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 27\/11\/2024 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM \u00a0 \u00a0 R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7 \u00a0 \u00a0 Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR Raport\u00f6r : Mustafa Erdem ATLIHAN Ba\u015fvurucu : \u0130smail KAYA Vekili : Av. Emrah \u00c7EL\u0130KTA\u015e \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, kolluk g\u00f6revlisince fiziksel \u015fiddet uygulanmas\u0131 ve bu olay hakk\u0131nda etkili bir ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmemesi nedeniyle insan haysiyetiyle ba\u011fda\u015fmayan muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Kolluk g\u00f6revlilerinin saat 17.00’de d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi ve ba\u015fvurucunun da imzas\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131yan 17\/3\/2021 tarihli tutana\u011fa g\u00f6re Ankara’n\u0131n Alt\u0131nda\u011f il\u00e7esinde bir sokakta \u015f\u00fcphe \u00fczerine durdurulan ticari takside yolcu olarak bulunan ba\u015fvurucu ve yan\u0131ndaki M.K.n\u0131n aranmas\u0131 sonucu M.K.n\u0131n \u00fczerinde bir ruhsats\u0131z tabanca, ba\u015fvurucunun \u00fczerinde de i\u00e7inde yirmi bir mermi bulunan bir po\u015fet ele ge\u00e7irilmi\u015f; yakalanan \u015fah\u0131slar doktor raporu al\u0131nd\u0131ktan sonra i\u015flemlerin yap\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in karakola g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Yine ayn\u0131 tarihi ta\u015f\u0131yan ve iki polis memuru taraf\u0131ndan saat 22.30’da d\u00fczenlenen tutanakta ise i\u015flemleri yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere karakola getirilen ba\u015fvurucunun \u00c7ocuk \u015eube M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne (\u00c7ocuk \u015eube) g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fclmek \u00fczere polis arac\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda “Beni niye \u00e7ocuk \u015fubeye g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcyorsunuz, beni g\u00f6t\u00fcremezsiniz.” \u015feklinde ba\u011f\u0131rmaya ve kendini sa\u011fa sola vurmaya ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131, arac\u0131n kap\u0131lar\u0131na …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-30461","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n