T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
BURAK AKBAY VE ESTET\u0130K YAYINCILIK A.\u015e. BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2022\/108643)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 20\/11\/2024<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Ekin \u00c7ANKAL<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucular<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
1. Burak AKBAY<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
2. Estetik Yay\u0131nc\u0131l\u0131k A.\u015e.<\/p>\n
Vekilleri<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Fahri EMEKS\u0130Z<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, bir gazetede yay\u0131mlanan k\u00f6\u015fe yaz\u0131s\u0131ndaki ifadelerin ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n \u015feref ve itibar\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131 ihlal etti\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucu \u015firket S\u00f6zc\u00fc gazetesinin sahibi; ba\u015fvurucu ger\u00e7ek ki\u015fi ise S\u00f6zc\u00fc gazetesinin kurucusudur.<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fvuruya konu, 13\/1\/2019 tarihinde T\u00fcrkiye gazetesinde C.K. imzas\u0131yla yay\u0131mlanan “S\u00f6zc\u00fc, Ter\u00f6rizmin Finansman\u0131 Yasas\u0131’n\u0131 nas\u0131l ihlal etti?” ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 yaz\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“S\u00f6zc\u00fc adl\u0131 FET\u00d6 mevkutesi, hukuken i\u015fledikleri su\u00e7lar\u0131 biliyor. Zaten i\u015fledi\u011fi \u00f6rg\u00fctsel su\u00e7lar\u0131 bildi\u011fi i\u00e7in gazetenin sahibi FET\u00d6 san\u0131\u011f\u0131 Burak Akbay yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131na ka\u00e7t\u0131. Hukukumuzun ilgili maddeleri gere\u011fi yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda ter\u00f6r su\u00e7undan ka\u00e7ak olan \u015fahs\u0131n gazetesi olmas\u0131 imk\u00e2ns\u0131z.<\/p>\n
\u015eu an hukuken S\u00f6zc\u00fc ile Zaman ya da Bug\u00fcn gazetesi aras\u0131nda fark yok. 6415 Say\u0131l\u0131 Ter\u00f6rizmin Finansman\u0131 Yasas\u0131’n\u0131n 4. Maddesi’nin ilk 3 bendi bunu net \u015fekilde ortaya koyuyor. 17-25 Aral\u0131k\u2019ta FET\u00d6\u2019ye bilerek ve isteyerek yard\u0131m eden, M\u0130T t\u0131rlar\u0131nda \u201cT\u00fcrkiye ter\u00f6ristlere destek oldu\u201d alg\u0131s\u0131na zemin haz\u0131rlayan S\u00f6zc\u00fc gazetesine kayyum gelmesi kanun gere\u011fi.<\/p>\n
Ter\u00f6rist olma zann\u0131yla hakk\u0131nda yakalama ve tutuklama olan \u015fahs\u0131n medya organ\u0131 olamaz. Hukuk bunu s\u00f6yl\u00fcyor. S\u00f6zc\u00fc\u2019n\u00fcn patronu Burak Akbay \u015fu an firari. FET\u00d6\u2019c\u00fc ter\u00f6ristlere yard\u0131m etti\u011fi iddias\u0131 iddianamelerde yaz\u0131yor. Hem ka\u00e7ak hem ter\u00f6ristlere yard\u0131m etmi\u015f biri medya sahibi olamaz. Bu durum, 1992\u2019de Miami\u2019de b\u00fct\u00fcn mallar\u0131na el konan Pablo Escobar\u2019la ayn\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
[A.\u0130.] ile Burak Akbay aras\u0131nda hukuken zerre fark yok. [A.\u0130.] \u015fu an bu \u00fclkede bir gazete kurabilir mi? Yar\u0131n hukukun emri olan kayyum karar\u0131 geldi\u011finde ve S\u00f6zc\u00fc gazetesine el konuldu\u011funda kimse a\u011flamas\u0131n. Hukukun gere\u011fi budur. S\u00f6zc\u00fc\u2019n\u00fcn \u00e7ok yak\u0131nda bir TMSF i\u015fletmesi h\u00e2line gelmesi hayat\u0131n ve hukukun ola\u011fan ak\u0131\u015f\u0131 gere\u011fi olacakt\u0131r. Kimse bu hukuksal geli\u015fmeye \u015fa\u015f\u0131rmas\u0131n!<\/p>\n
Hem S\u00f6zc\u00fc\u2019n\u00fcn sahibi Burak Akbay hem de t\u00fcm S\u00f6zc\u00fc yazarlar\u0131 17-25 Aral\u0131k FET\u00d6 darbe te\u015febb\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fc canh\u0131ra\u015f destekleyerek su\u00e7 i\u015flediler. FET\u00d6 \u00fcyesi olmamakla beraber FET\u00d6\u2019ye bilerek ve isteyerek yard\u0131m ve yatakl\u0131k su\u00e7unu i\u015flememi\u015f neredeyse hi\u00e7bir S\u00f6zc\u00fc yazar\u0131 yok. Bu yaz\u0131da tek tek bunlar\u0131 hukuki delillerle ispatlayaca\u011f\u0131m. \u0130stanbul Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131m\u0131z [\u0130.F.] ve ekibinin FET\u00d6 ile m\u00fccadele konusundaki e\u011filmez ve b\u00fck\u00fclmez cesur tavr\u0131n\u0131 biliyor [E.] ve Burak Akbay.<\/p>\n
\u0130\u015fte o y\u00fczden tela\u015f ve panikle T\u00fcrkiye gazetemiz ve [\u00d6.] Ailesi aleyhine iftiralar ve hakaretler ya\u011fd\u0131r\u0131yorlar. Ama\u00e7lar\u0131 bizi korkutarak susturmak. H\u00fck\u00fbmete yak\u0131n bilinen \u00e7o\u011funluk bizim taraf k\u00f6\u015fe yazar\u0131n\u0131 bu y\u00f6ntemlerle susturdular ve sindirdiler. Savc\u0131lar\u0131m\u0131z\u0131n cesaretinin y\u00fczde biri bizim taraf k\u00f6\u015fe yazarlar\u0131nda yok. Hatta S\u00f6zc\u00fc yazarlar\u0131 kendisini \u00f6vd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde ya da tebrik i\u00e7in arad\u0131\u011f\u0131nda sevindirik olan s\u00f6zde muhafazak\u00e2r yazar dolu ortal\u0131k. Fakat bizleri susturamazs\u0131n\u0131z. G\u00fcne\u015f bal\u00e7\u0131kla s\u0131vanmaz “G\u00f6lge Adam” [E.A.]. Bunu t\u0131pk\u0131 [E.D.] gibi yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131na ka\u00e7m\u0131\u015f FET\u00d6 san\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve hakk\u0131nda tutuklama olan o\u011flun m\u00fccrim Burak Akbay\u2019a da s\u00f6yle. Bak Ayd\u0131n [D.] da [\u00d6.] Ailesi aleyhine tetik\u00e7isi [A.H.ye] al\u00e7ak\u00e7a iftiralar att\u0131r\u0131yordu. Ne oldu? [A.D.] tarihin \u00e7\u00f6pl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne gitti. \u015eu an ya\u015fay\u0131p ya\u015famad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bile bilinmiyor. [A.H.] ise iktidara yaranmak i\u00e7in her g\u00fcn k\u0131rk takla at\u0131yor.<\/p>\n
[E.A.] asl\u0131nda hukuken S\u00f6zc\u00fc\u2019ye el konulmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini biliyor. Tek derdi bizim taraf medyas\u0131n\u0131n susmas\u0131 ve bu hukuki ger\u00e7e\u011fi g\u00fcndeme getirmemesi. Bu olay\u0131n ge\u00e7i\u015ftirilmesi. O y\u00fczden ikinci [O.E.] kabilinden ismi cismi bilinmeyen bir Maocu art\u0131\u011f\u0131 [O.TV] tetik\u00e7isini \u00fcst\u00fcm\u00fcze sal\u0131yor. [E.A.-S.Y.] ortak yap\u0131m\u0131 isimsiz cisimsiz bir tetik\u00e7inin yaz\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131 [S.Y.] yaz\u0131yor ve S\u00f6zc\u00fc\u2019de bu yaz\u0131lar\u0131 yay\u0131nlan\u0131yor. Zaten bu tetik\u00e7i de hem [\u00d6.] Ailesi\u2019ne hem de biz yerli ve mill\u00ee kalemlere iftira yaz\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131 [S.Y.nin] yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fcn itiraf etti.<\/p>\n
T\u00fcm yarg\u0131 camiam\u0131z biliyor ki, sadece [E.\u00c7.] ve [N.D.] de\u011fil neredeyse t\u00fcm S\u00f6zc\u00fc yazarlar\u0131 17-25 Aral\u0131k darbe te\u015febb\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fc destekleyerek FET\u00d6\u2019ye yard\u0131m ve yatakl\u0131k etti. [U.D.nin] m\u00fccrim psikolojisiyle sa\u011fa sola sald\u0131rma sebebi budur. [Y.\u00d6.] de 18 Aral\u0131k 2013\u2019te \u201cOkyanus \u00f6tesi y\u00f6netime el koydu\u201d diye yazd\u0131. Yani FET\u00d6\u2019n\u00fcn darbe yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 biliyordu ama sonra hararetle 17-25 Aral\u0131k darbesini savundu [\u00d6.]. T\u00fcm FET\u00d6 arg\u00fcmanlar\u0131n\u0131 kullanarak FET\u00d6 \u00fcyesi olmamakla birlikte FET\u00d6\u2019ye yard\u0131m ve yatakl\u0131k su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi. [S.\u00d6.] zaten Ekim 2015\u2019e kadar FET\u00d6 kanal\u0131ndan maa\u015f al\u0131p FET\u00d6\u2019ye hizmet ederek bu su\u00e7u i\u015fledi.<\/p>\n
[S.Y.] ve tetik\u00e7isi [O.E.n]in 17-25 Aral\u0131k darbe te\u015febb\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fc destekleyen S\u00f6zc\u00fc yaz\u0131lar\u0131ndan su\u00e7 \u00f6rneklerini bu k\u00f6\u015fede daha evvel yazm\u0131\u015ft\u0131m. Bu hukuki s\u00fcre\u00e7 boyunca yine yazaca\u011f\u0131m. Bu ikinci [O.E.] olmak isteyen tetik\u00e7iye [O.nun] [S.Y.] y\u00fcz\u00fcnden hayat\u0131n\u0131n bitti\u011fini ve Bed-Stuy semtinde 15 metrekarelik k\u00fcmes gibi yerde ya\u015fay\u0131p garsonluk yapmak zorunda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 hat\u0131rlat\u0131r\u0131m. Sonradan [S.Y.ni]n \u015fantajlar\u0131yla Habert\u00fcrk\u2019e zorla yerle\u015ftirilmesi [O.E.n]in S\u00f6zc\u00fc d\u00f6neminde i\u015fledi\u011fi su\u00e7lar\u0131 affettirmiyor. 17-25 Aral\u0131k darbe te\u015febb\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fc alenen desteklemi\u015f, yani FET\u00d6\u2019ye bilerek ve isteyerek yard\u0131m ve yatakl\u0131k etmi\u015f t\u00fcm S\u00f6zc\u00fc elemanlar\u0131 hukuki bedelini \u00f6deyecekler.<\/p>\n
Bu soru\u015fturmay\u0131 g\u00f6t\u00fcren savc\u0131 ve h\u00e2kimlerimiz FET\u00d6 ile m\u00fccadele noktas\u0131nda destans\u0131 i\u015fler yapm\u0131\u015f yi\u011fit adamlard\u0131r. Yarg\u0131m\u0131z ulusalc\u0131l\u0131k maskesine s\u0131\u011f\u0131nan Maocular\u0131 ve kom\u00fcnistleri \u00e7ok iyi tan\u0131yor. Kemalist g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcml\u00fc G\u00fclenistler nas\u0131l ki bu \u00fclkenin d\u00fc\u015fman\u0131ysa, ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde Kemalist g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcml\u00fc kom\u00fcnistler de bu milletin d\u00fc\u015fman\u0131d\u0131r. Bu b\u00f6yle biline…”<\/p>\n
4. Bahse konu k\u00f6\u015fe yaz\u0131s\u0131 ile ilgili olarak ba\u015fvurucular, ki\u015filik haklar\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini; kendilerinin haks\u0131z bir \u015fekilde Fetullah\u00e7\u0131 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc\/Paralel Devlet Yap\u0131lanmas\u0131 (FET\u00d6\/PDY) \u00fcyesi olmakla itham edildiklerini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015f ve manevi tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u0130lk derece mahkemesi manevi tazminat isteminin reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. Mahkeme gerek\u00e7esinde, ba\u015fvurucular hakk\u0131nda mevcut ceza kovu\u015fturmas\u0131nda taraflar\u0131n beyanlar\u0131n\u0131 dikkate alm\u0131\u015f, taraflar aras\u0131nda kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131 a\u011f\u0131r ele\u015ftiri mahiyetinde birtak\u0131m at\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n mevcut oldu\u011funu de\u011ferlendirmi\u015f; yaz\u0131n\u0131n genel itibar\u0131yla ele\u015ftirilerden olu\u015ftu\u011funu; taraflar\u0131n gazeteci kimlikleri sayesinde haklar\u0131ndaki ele\u015ftirilere cevap verme imk\u00e2n\u0131na fazlas\u0131yla sahip olduklar\u0131n\u0131 ve yine bu ele\u015ftirilere daha \u00e7ok ho\u015fg\u00f6r\u00fc g\u00f6stermeleri gerekti\u011fini de\u011ferlendirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. \u0130lk derece mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n istinaf edilmesi \u00fczerine B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi istinaf isteminin reddine kesin olarak karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. Ba\u015fvurucular 16\/12\/2022 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
7. Ba\u015fvurucular, ihtilafa konu k\u00f6\u015fe yaz\u0131s\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a FET\u00d6\/PDY ile ili\u015fkileri oldu\u011funun iddia edildi\u011fini oysa ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc i\u00e7indeki hiyerar\u015fik yap\u0131ya d\u00e2hil olmamakla birlikte \u00f6rg\u00fcte yard\u0131m etme su\u00e7u kapsam\u0131nda haklar\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturmada, mezk\u00fbr k\u00f6\u015fe yaz\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n yazar\u0131n\u0131n ifade verdi\u011fini ve kendilerinin FET\u00d6\/PDY \u00fcyesi oldu\u011funu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnmedi\u011fini beyan etti\u011fini vurgulam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Mezk\u00fbr yaz\u0131yla kendilerine hakaret edildi\u011fi ve ki\u015filik haklar\u0131n\u0131n sald\u0131r\u0131ya u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcren ba\u015fvurucular, adil yarg\u0131lanma haklar\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131ndad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
8. Ba\u015fvurunun, bir b\u00fct\u00fcn olarak Anayasa’n\u0131n 17. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen \u015feref ve itibar\u0131n korunmas\u0131 hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmesi gerekti\u011fi de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
9. Somut olayda, ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n \u015feref ve itibar\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131 hakk\u0131 ile daval\u0131n\u0131n ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn \u00e7at\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Devletin, bireylerin maddi ve manevi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131 ile ilgili pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckleri \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde \u015feref ve itibar\u0131n korunmas\u0131 hakk\u0131 ile di\u011fer taraf\u0131n Anayasa\u2019da g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f olan ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden yararlanma hakk\u0131 aras\u0131nda adil bir denge kurmas\u0131 gerekir. \u00c7at\u0131\u015fan bu haklar aras\u0131nda dengeleme yap\u0131l\u0131rken kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fctler genel olarak \u015funlard\u0131r:<\/p>\n
i. \u0130fadelerin kim taraf\u0131ndan dile getirildi\u011fi (Nihat Zeybekci, B. No: 2015\/5633, 8\/5\/2019, \u00a7 29; Kemal K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7daro\u011flu, B. No: 2014\/1577, 25\/10\/2017, \u00a7 59),<\/p>\n
ii. Hedef al\u0131nan ki\u015finin kim oldu\u011fu, \u00fcnl\u00fcl\u00fck d\u00fczeyi ve \u00f6nceki davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131 yan\u0131nda katlanmas\u0131 gereken ele\u015ftirinin s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131n sade bir vatanda\u015fa g\u00f6re daha geni\u015f olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 (hedef al\u0131nan ki\u015finin kamusal yetki kullanan bir g\u00f6revli olmas\u0131 nedeniyle yap\u0131lan de\u011ferlendirmelerin bulundu\u011fu kararlar i\u00e7in bkz. Ali Suat Ertosun (7), B. No: 2014\/1416, 15\/10\/2015, \u00a7 36; Z\u00fcbeyde F\u00fcsun \u00dcstel ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2018\/17635, 26\/7\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 128, 129; Nilg\u00fcn Halloran, B. No: 2012\/1184, 16\/7\/2014, \u00a7 45; \u0130lhan Cihaner (2), \u00a7 82; Kadir Sa\u011fd\u0131\u00e7 [GK], B. No: 2013\/6617, 8\/4\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 60-66; hedef al\u0131nan ki\u015finin siyaset\u00e7i olmas\u0131 nedeniyle yap\u0131lan de\u011ferlendirmelerin bulundu\u011fu kararlar i\u00e7in bkz. Bekir Co\u015fkun, \u00a7\u00a7 66, 67; Erg\u00fcn Poyraz (2) [GK], B. No: 2013\/8503, 27\/10\/2015, \u00a7 56; Kemal K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7daro\u011flu, \u00a7\u00a7 59- 61),<\/p>\n
iii. \u0130fadelerin genel yarara ili\u015fkin bir tart\u0131\u015fmaya katk\u0131 sa\u011flay\u0131p sa\u011flamad\u0131\u011f\u0131, kamuoyu ile di\u011fer ki\u015filerin d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnce a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda sahip olduklar\u0131 haklar\u0131n a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bekir Co\u015fkun, \u00a7 69; \u00c7etin Do\u011fan (2) [GK], B. No: 2014\/3494, 27\/2\/2019, \u00a7 62; Erg\u00fcn Poyraz (2), \u00a7 56; Kadir Sa\u011fd\u0131\u00e7, \u00a7\u00a7 60-66; \u0130lhan Cihaner (2), \u00a7\u00a7 66-73; Nihat Zeybekci, \u00a7 32),<\/p>\n
iv. Kamuyu bilgilendirme de\u011feri, toplumsal ilginin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve konunun g\u00fcncel olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Seray \u015eahiner \u00d6zkan, B. No: 2016\/6439, 9\/6\/2021, \u00a7 44; \u0130brahim Okur (2), B. No: 2018\/12363, 26\/5\/2021, \u00a7 28),<\/p>\n
v. \u015eik\u00e2yet\u00e7inin kendisine y\u00f6neltilen ifadelere cevap verme olana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Temel Co\u015fkun, B. No: 2017\/1632, 29\/1\/2020, \u00a7 33; \u015eaban Sevin\u00e7 (2), B. No: 2016\/36777, 26\/5\/2021, \u00a7 42; Nihat Zeybekci, \u00a7 39),<\/p>\n
vi. \u0130fadelerin hedef al\u0131nan ki\u015finin hayat\u0131 \u00fczerindeki etkisi (Ali Suat Ertosun (2), B. No: 2013\/1592, 20\/5\/2015, \u00a7 33; H\u00fcseyin Kocab\u0131y\u0131k, B. No: 2020\/15593, 22\/11\/2022, \u00a7 24),<\/p>\n
vii. Hukuki yapt\u0131r\u0131ma konu edilen ifadelerin kullan\u0131ld\u0131klar\u0131 ba\u011flam\u0131ndan kopart\u0131l\u0131p kopart\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Nilg\u00fcn Halloran, \u00a7 52; Bekir Co\u015fkun, \u00a7\u00a7 62, 63; \u00d6nder Bal\u0131k\u00e7\u0131, B. No: 2014\/6009, 15\/2\/2017, \u00a7 45, Nihat Zeybekci, \u00a7 36),<\/p>\n
viii. Ba\u015fvurucunun yapt\u0131r\u0131ma maruz kalma endi\u015fesinin ba\u015fvurucu \u00fczerinde cayd\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 etki yarat\u0131p yaratmayaca\u011f\u0131 (benzer y\u00f6ndeki de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7in bkz. Erg\u00fcn Poyraz (2), \u00a7 79; Kemal K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7daro\u011flu ve Cumhuriyet Halk Partisi, B. No: 2014\/12482, 8\/5\/2019, \u00a7 46),<\/p>\n
ix. Dava konusu s\u00f6ylemlerin maddi vak\u0131alar\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131 veya de\u011fer yarg\u0131s\u0131 olarak nitelendirilip nitelendirilemeyece\u011fi (Durmu\u015f Fikri Sa\u011flar (2) [GK], B. No: 2017\/29735, 17\/3\/2021, \u00a7 50; Deniz Karadeniz ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2014\/18001, 6\/2\/2020, \u00a7\u00a7 48-49).<\/p>\n
10. Somut olayda ba\u015fvurucu ger\u00e7ek ve t\u00fczel ki\u015fi, daval\u0131 gazetecinin k\u00f6\u015fe yaz\u0131s\u0131nda ki\u015filik haklar\u0131n\u0131 ihlal etti\u011fini iddia etmi\u015ftir. Bu ba\u011flamda, mezk\u00fbr k\u00f6\u015fe yaz\u0131s\u0131 incelendi\u011finde ba\u015fvurucularla ilgili “FET\u00d6 san\u0131\u011f\u0131 Burak Akbay yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131na ka\u00e7t\u0131. Hukukumuzun ilgili maddeleri gere\u011fi yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda ter\u00f6r su\u00e7undan ka\u00e7ak olan \u015fahs\u0131n gazetesi olmas\u0131 imk\u00e2ns\u0131z.”; “T\u00fcrkiye ter\u00f6ristlere destek oldu\u201d alg\u0131s\u0131na zemin haz\u0131rlayan S\u00f6zc\u00fc gazetesine kayyum gelmesi kanun gere\u011fi.”; “Ter\u00f6rist olma zann\u0131yla hakk\u0131nda yakalama ve tutuklama olan \u015fahs\u0131n medya organ\u0131 olamaz. Hukuk bunu s\u00f6yl\u00fcyor.”; “[A.\u0130.] ile Burak Akbay aras\u0131nda hukuken zerre fark yok. [A.\u0130.] \u015fu an bu \u00fclkede bir gazete kurabilir mi? Yar\u0131n hukukun emri olan kayyum karar\u0131 geldi\u011finde ve S\u00f6zc\u00fc gazetesine el konuldu\u011funda kimse a\u011flamas\u0131n. Hukukun gere\u011fi budur.”; “\u0130\u015fte o y\u00fczden tela\u015f ve panikle T\u00fcrkiye gazetemiz ve [\u00d6.] Ailesi aleyhine iftiralar ve hakaretler ya\u011fd\u0131r\u0131yorlar. Ama\u00e7lar\u0131 bizi korkutarak susturmak. H\u00fck\u00fbmete yak\u0131n bilinen \u00e7o\u011funluk bizim taraf k\u00f6\u015fe yazar\u0131n\u0131 bu y\u00f6ntemlerle susturdular ve sindirdiler.”; [“O. TV”] tetik\u00e7isini \u00fcst\u00fcm\u00fcze sal\u0131yor. [E.A.-S.Y.] ortak yap\u0131m\u0131 isimsiz cisimsiz bir tetik\u00e7inin yaz\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131 [S.Y.] yaz\u0131yor ve S\u00f6zc\u00fc\u2019de bu yaz\u0131lar\u0131 yay\u0131nlan\u0131yor. Zaten bu tetik\u00e7i de hem [\u00d6.] Ailesi\u2019ne hem de biz yerli ve mill\u00ee kalemlere iftira yaz\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131 [S.Y.ni]n yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fcn itiraf etti.”; “[S.Y.] ve tetik\u00e7isi [O.E.n]in 17-25 Aral\u0131k darbe te\u015febb\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fc destekleyen S\u00f6zc\u00fc yaz\u0131lar\u0131ndan su\u00e7 \u00f6rneklerini bu k\u00f6\u015fede daha evvel yazm\u0131\u015ft\u0131m. Bu hukuki s\u00fcre\u00e7 boyunca yine yazaca\u011f\u0131m.” \u015feklinde ifadeler sarf edildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir.<\/p>\n
11. Ba\u015fvuruya konu yaz\u0131n\u0131n kaleme al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 d\u00f6nemde, daval\u0131n\u0131n kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifadelerden, ba\u015fvurucular ve daval\u0131n\u0131n yazar\u0131 oldu\u011fu gazete aras\u0131nda polemik oldu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Daval\u0131 gazeteci, bu polemik kapsam\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucu ger\u00e7ek ki\u015fi hakk\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclmekte olan ceza davas\u0131n\u0131 da dikkate alarak ba\u015fvurucu gazete ve mezk\u00fbr gazetenin sahibi hakk\u0131nda birtak\u0131m de\u011fer yarg\u0131lar\u0131 ortaya koymu\u015ftur. Daval\u0131ya g\u00f6re, ba\u015fvurucular \u00f6teden beri sergiledikleri gazetecilik anlay\u0131\u015f\u0131 ile FET\u00d6\/PDY’ye hizmet etmi\u015ftir. Bu noktada \u00f6nemle alt\u0131 \u00e7izilmelidir ki Anayasa Mahkemesinin daha \u00f6nce bir\u00e7ok kez ifade etti\u011fi \u00fczere somut unsurlarla desteklenmiyorsa de\u011fer yarg\u0131s\u0131 \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcs\u00fcz olabilir (di\u011ferleri aras\u0131ndan bkz. Cem Mermut, B. No: 2013\/7861, 16\/4\/2015, \u00a7 48).<\/p>\n
12. Somut olaya gelince daval\u0131n\u0131n kaleme ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 yaz\u0131n\u0131n ana fikri, ba\u015fvurucu ger\u00e7ek ki\u015finin konusu ter\u00f6r su\u00e7u olan bir davada san\u0131k s\u0131fat\u0131yla yarg\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda bulundu\u011fu olgular\u0131ndan yola \u00e7\u0131karak, b\u00f6ylesi bir ki\u015finin yay\u0131n organ\u0131 sahibi olmas\u0131n\u0131n hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fudur. Yaz\u0131da kullan\u0131lan dil ve \u00fcslup muhatab\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan rahats\u0131z edici olabilir. Ancak Anayasa Mahkemesinin benimsedi\u011fi gibi demokratik bir toplumun zorunlu temellerinden olan, toplumun ilerlemesi ve bireyin \u00f6zg\u00fcveni i\u00e7in gerekli temel \u015fartlardan birini te\u015fkil eden ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, sadece kabul g\u00f6ren veya zarars\u0131z yahut kay\u0131ts\u0131zl\u0131k i\u00e7eren bilgiler ya da fikirler i\u00e7in de\u011fil ayn\u0131 zamanda k\u0131r\u0131c\u0131, \u015fok edici veya rahats\u0131z edici olanlar i\u00e7in de ge\u00e7erlidir (Emin Ayd\u0131n (2), B. No: 2013\/3178, 25\/6\/2015, \u00a7 35; Bekir Co\u015fkun, \u00a7 52). Nitekim bas\u0131n \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn kapsam\u0131n\u0131n demokrasi ile yak\u0131n ili\u015fkisinin do\u011fal sonucu olarak bir dereceye kadar abart\u0131ya ve provoke etmeye izin verecek \u015fekilde geni\u015f yorumlanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi kabul edilmelidir (Ali Suat Ertosun, B. No: 2013\/1047, 15\/4\/2015, \u00a7 66; Z\u00fcbeyde F\u00fcsun \u00dcstel ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 102).<\/p>\n
13. \u0130lk derece mahkemesi, gerek\u00e7eli karardan da anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere, taraflar aras\u0131nda mevcut polemik de dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda daval\u0131n\u0131n yaz\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcm\u00fcyle keyf\u00ee bir ki\u015fisel sald\u0131r\u0131 olu\u015fturmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 tespit etmi\u015ftir. Bununla birlikte mahkemenin, ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n toplumsal konumlar\u0131 gere\u011fi, kendilerini hedef ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia ettikleri yaz\u0131ya cevap verme ve bu cevab\u0131 geni\u015f kitlelere ula\u015ft\u0131rma imk\u00e2n\u0131na sahip olduklar\u0131n\u0131 da g\u00f6zard\u0131 etmedi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir.<\/p>\n
14. Anayasa Mahkemesinin pek \u00e7ok karar\u0131nda vurguland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere yarg\u0131 mercileri bir k\u0131s\u0131tlaman\u0131n ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ile ba\u011fda\u015f\u0131p ba\u011fda\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususunda karar verirken kullan\u0131lan ifadeleri ba\u011flam\u0131ndan kopartmaks\u0131z\u0131n olay\u0131n b\u00fct\u00fcnselli\u011fi i\u00e7inde de\u011ferlendirmeleri gerekmektedir (Cem Atmaca, B. No: 2018\/6030, 8\/9\/2021, \u00a7 37; Nilg\u00fcn Halloran, \u00a7 52; \u00d6nder Bal\u0131k\u00e7\u0131, \u00a7 45). Somut olayda, yarg\u0131 mercilerinin Anayasa Mahkemesi i\u00e7tihad\u0131 \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ile \u015feref ve itibar\u0131n korunmas\u0131 hakk\u0131 aras\u0131nda dengeleme \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fctlerini olaya uygulayarak adil bir denge kurduklar\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
15. Yukar\u0131daki de\u011ferlendirmelerin tamam\u0131 ve yarg\u0131 mercilerinin farkl\u0131 \u00e7\u0131karlar\u0131 dengelerken sahip olduklar\u0131 takdir paylar\u0131 dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, somut olayda devletin ba\u015fvurucunun \u015feref ve itibar\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131 hakk\u0131 ba\u011flam\u0131ndaki pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 davranmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir. Zira daval\u0131n\u0131n bir gazeteci olarak kaleme ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 yaz\u0131s\u0131nda yine gazeteci olan ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifadelerin, ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirilmemesini gerektiren herhangi bir toplumsal ihtiyac\u0131n mevcut olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Aksi y\u00f6ndeki de\u011ferlendirme bir temel hak olan ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn \u00f6z\u00fcne dokunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
16. 30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun\u2019un 48. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun ba\u015fvurular\u0131n Anayasa Mahkemesince kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilebilece\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Bu ba\u011flamda bir ihlal bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k olan ba\u015fvurular a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun kabul edilebilir (Hikmet Balabano\u011flu, B. No: 2012\/1334, 17\/9\/2013, \u00a7 24).<\/p>\n
17. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvuru konusu olayda \u015feref ve itibar\u0131n korunmas\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edilmedi\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131k oldu\u011fundan ba\u015fvurunun a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. \u015eeref ve itibar\u0131n korunmas\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. Yarg\u0131lama giderlerinin ba\u015fvurucular \u00fczerinde BIRAKILMASINA 20\/11\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 20\/11\/2024 tarihli ve 2022\/108643 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 BURAK AKBAY VE ESTET\u0130K YAYINCILIK A.\u015e. BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2022\/108643) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 20\/11\/2024 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM \u00a0 \u00a0 R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7 \u00a0 \u00a0 Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR Raport\u00f6r : Ekin \u00c7ANKAL Ba\u015fvurucular : 1. Burak AKBAY \u00a0 \u00a0 2. Estetik Yay\u0131nc\u0131l\u0131k A.\u015e. Vekilleri : Av. Fahri EMEKS\u0130Z \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, bir gazetede yay\u0131mlanan k\u00f6\u015fe yaz\u0131s\u0131ndaki ifadelerin ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n \u015feref ve itibar\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131 ihlal etti\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu \u015firket S\u00f6zc\u00fc gazetesinin sahibi; ba\u015fvurucu ger\u00e7ek ki\u015fi ise S\u00f6zc\u00fc gazetesinin kurucusudur. 3. Ba\u015fvuruya konu, 13\/1\/2019 tarihinde T\u00fcrkiye gazetesinde C.K. imzas\u0131yla yay\u0131mlanan “S\u00f6zc\u00fc, Ter\u00f6rizmin Finansman\u0131 Yasas\u0131’n\u0131 nas\u0131l ihlal etti?” ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 yaz\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir: “S\u00f6zc\u00fc adl\u0131 FET\u00d6 mevkutesi, hukuken i\u015fledikleri su\u00e7lar\u0131 biliyor. Zaten i\u015fledi\u011fi \u00f6rg\u00fctsel su\u00e7lar\u0131 bildi\u011fi i\u00e7in gazetenin sahibi FET\u00d6 san\u0131\u011f\u0131 Burak Akbay yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131na ka\u00e7t\u0131. Hukukumuzun ilgili maddeleri gere\u011fi yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda ter\u00f6r su\u00e7undan ka\u00e7ak olan \u015fahs\u0131n gazetesi olmas\u0131 imk\u00e2ns\u0131z. \u015eu an hukuken S\u00f6zc\u00fc ile Zaman ya da Bug\u00fcn gazetesi aras\u0131nda fark yok. 6415 Say\u0131l\u0131 Ter\u00f6rizmin Finansman\u0131 Yasas\u0131’n\u0131n 4. Maddesi’nin ilk 3 bendi bunu net \u015fekilde ortaya koyuyor. 17-25 Aral\u0131k\u2019ta FET\u00d6\u2019ye bilerek ve isteyerek yard\u0131m eden, M\u0130T …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-28190","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n