T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130BRAH\u0130M BA\u015ePINAR BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/37022)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 20\/11\/2024<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Erdem Ender \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
\u0130brahim BA\u015ePINAR<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Ay\u015fe S\u00fceda \u00dcNAL<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, koronavir\u00fcs salg\u0131n\u0131na y\u00f6nelik tedbirler kapsam\u0131nda ceza infaz kurumundaki g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerin k\u0131s\u0131tlanmas\u0131 ile e\u015f g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc yapt\u0131r\u0131lmamas\u0131 nedeniyle aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n, dilek\u00e7elerine i\u015flem yap\u0131lmamas\u0131 nedeniyle etkili ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucu, ba\u015fvuru tarihinde anayasal d\u00fczeni ortadan kald\u0131rmaya te\u015febb\u00fcs etme su\u00e7undan Sincan 2 No.lu F Tipi Y\u00fcksek G\u00fcvenlikli Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumunda (\u0130nfaz Kurumu) tutuklu olarak bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fvurucu, koronavir\u00fcs (COVID-19) salg\u0131n\u0131 nedeniyle g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerin s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 uygulamas\u0131 ve e\u015f g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc yapt\u0131r\u0131lmamas\u0131 nedeniyle 9\/9\/2020 tarihinde Ankara Bat\u0131 2. \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine (\u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi) ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur. \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi 30\/9\/2020 tarihli karar\u0131yla ba\u015fvuruyu reddetmi\u015ftir. Kararda e\u015f g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc y\u00f6n\u00fcnden \u0130nfaz Kurumu taraf\u0131ndan al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f bir karar bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan konu hakk\u0131nda karar al\u0131nmak \u00fczere dilek\u00e7enin \u0130nfaz Kurumuna g\u00f6nderilmesi gerekti\u011fini, salg\u0131n hastal\u0131k nedeniyle yap\u0131lan uygulaman\u0131n usule ve kanuna uygun oldu\u011funu belirtmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. Ba\u015fvurucu, \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011finin karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 8\/10\/2020 tarihinde Ankara Bat\u0131 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesine (A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi) itirazda bulunmu\u015ftur. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi karar\u0131n usule ve kanuna uygun oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle 20\/10\/2020 tarihinde itiraz\u0131 reddetmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucu, nihai h\u00fckm\u00fc 26\/10\/2020 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra 12\/11\/2020 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur. <\/p>\n
6. Ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
7. \u00d6deme g\u00fcc\u00fcnden yoksun oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurucunun adli yard\u0131m talebinin kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
A. COVID-19 Salg\u0131n\u0131 Nedeniyle G\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerin S\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 \u0130ddias\u0131 Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden Aile Hayat\u0131na Sayg\u0131 Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
8. Ba\u015fvurucu; salg\u0131n hastal\u0131k nedeniyle g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerin k\u0131s\u0131tland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek \u00f6zel hayata ve aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n, dilek\u00e7elerine i\u015flem yap\u0131lmamas\u0131 nedeniyle etkili ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131, h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc ve tutuklular\u0131n sa\u011fl\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla mevzuat \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde \u00f6nlemler al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc bildirmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 ba\u015fvuru formundaki iddialar\u0131 tekrar etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fvurucunun iddialar\u0131 aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
10. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
11. H\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fclerin ziyaret ya da g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f hakk\u0131 13\/12\/2004 tarihli ve 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza ve G\u00fcvenlik Tedbirlerinin \u0130nfaz\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 83. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. Anayasa Mahkemesi, somut ba\u015fvuruya konu olan tedbirleri Yunus Bulut (B. No: 2020\/38826, 20\/7\/2023) karar\u0131nda kanunilik \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fct\u00fc ba\u011flam\u0131nda incelemi\u015ftir. Anayasa Mahkemesi, yukar\u0131da belirtilen kanuni d\u00fczenlemenin mahpuslar\u0131n ziyaret hakk\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 ya da engellenmesi konusunda idari makamlara a\u00e7\u0131k ve genel bir yetki vermedi\u011fini, aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131na yap\u0131lan bu m\u00fcdahalenin salt idari makamlar\u0131n kararlar\u0131na dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 tespit ederek m\u00fcdahalenin kanuni dayana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir (Yunus Bulut, \u00a7\u00a7 55, 57, 58).<\/p>\n
12. Somut ba\u015fvuruda Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fck taraf\u0131ndan g\u00f6nderilen yaz\u0131 do\u011frultusunda mahpuslar\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k ve kapal\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f haklar\u0131na k\u0131s\u0131tlamalar getirildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Ziyaret hakk\u0131n\u0131n idare taraf\u0131ndan k\u0131s\u0131tlanmas\u0131na imk\u00e2n veren a\u00e7\u0131k bir d\u00fczenleme bulunmamas\u0131na ra\u011fmen s\u00f6z konusu tedbirin uyguland\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden Yunus Bulut karar\u0131nda var\u0131lan sonu\u00e7tan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren bir durum olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, m\u00fcdahalenin kanuni temelinin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir (benzer y\u00f6nde karalar i\u00e7in bkz. S\u00fcleyman Kurt (2), B.No:2020\/30704, 7\/3\/2024; Murat K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7 ve Di\u011ferleri, B.No: 2020\/25564: 7\/3\/2024; Mehmet Ata K\u0131z\u0131l\u00e7\u0131nar, B.No:2020\/29397, 6\/6\/2024).<\/p>\n
13. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 20. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
B. E\u015fle Mahrem G\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme Talebi Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden Aile Hayat\u0131na Sayg\u0131 Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
14. Ba\u015fvurucu, e\u015f g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc i\u00e7in \u00fc\u00e7 defa talepte bulundu\u011funu ancak \u0130nfaz Kurumu taraf\u0131ndan cevap verilmemesi nedeniyle aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini iddia etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
15. E\u015fle mahrem g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme uygulamas\u0131 30\/3\/2013 tarihli ve 28603 say\u0131l\u0131 Resm\u00ee Gazete’de yay\u0131mlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren H\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc ve Tutuklular\u0131n \u00d6d\u00fcllendirilmesi Hakk\u0131nda Y\u00f6netmelik’te mahpuslar\u0131n ceza infaz kurumundaki tutum ve davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesi sonucunda tan\u0131nan te\u015fvik esasl\u0131 bir ayr\u0131cal\u0131k (\u00f6d\u00fcl) olarak d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f; \u00f6d\u00fcllendirmede yetkili merci ise \u0130dare ve G\u00f6zlem Kurulu olarak belirlenmi\u015ftir. Anayasa Mahkemesinin Mustafa Gen\u00e7, (B. No: 2018\/12508, 11\/12\/2018) karar\u0131nda \u00f6d\u00fcl uygulamas\u0131n\u0131n niteli\u011fine ve uygulamadan kaynaklanan \u015fik\u00e2yetlere kar\u015f\u0131 izlenecek usule ili\u015fkin de\u011ferlendirmelere yer verilmi\u015ftir (Mustafa Gen\u00e7, \u00a7\u00a7 30-31).Buna g\u00f6re \u00f6d\u00fcllendirme hususunda \u00f6ncelikle idare ve g\u00f6zlem kuruluna ba\u015fvurulmadan infaz h\u00e2kimli\u011fine \u015fik\u00e2yet imk\u00e2n\u0131 bulunmamaktad\u0131r (Mustafa Gen\u00e7, \u00a7 32). Anayasa Mahkemesi, s\u00f6z konu usule uygun \u015fekilde ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle an\u0131lan kararda kabul edilemezlik sonucuna ula\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
16. Anayasa Mahkemesine bireysel ba\u015fvuru, iddia edilen hak ihlallerinin yarg\u0131 mercilerince d\u00fczeltilmemesi h\u00e2linde ba\u015fvurulabilecek ikincil nitelikte bir ba\u015fvuru yoludur. Bireysel ba\u015fvuru yolunun ikincil niteli\u011fi gere\u011fi Anayasa Mahkemesine bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunabilmek i\u00e7in \u00f6ncelikle ola\u011fan kanun yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmesi zorunludur. Bu ilke uyar\u0131nca ba\u015fvurucunun \u015fik\u00e2yetini \u00f6ncelikle ve s\u00fcresinde yetkili idari ve yarg\u0131sal mercilere usul\u00fcne uygun olarak iletmesi, bu konuda sahip oldu\u011fu bilgi ve kan\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131 zaman\u0131nda bu makamlara sunmas\u0131, ayn\u0131 zamanda bu s\u00fcre\u00e7te dava ve ba\u015fvurusunu takip etmek i\u00e7in gerekli \u00f6zeni g\u00f6stermi\u015f olmas\u0131 gerekir (Ay\u015fe Z\u0131raman ve Cennet Ye\u015filyurt, B. No: 2012\/403, 26\/3\/2013 \u00a7 17).<\/p>\n
17. Somut olayda ba\u015fvurucu, e\u015fiyle mahrem g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme yapmak istedi\u011fine ili\u015fkin taleplerini muhtelif tarihlerde \u0130nfaz Kurumuna iletmi\u015f olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen cevap verilmedi\u011finden yak\u0131nmaktad\u0131r. \u00d6te yandan ba\u015fvurucunun \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine verdi\u011fi ba\u015fvuru dilek\u00e7esinin, talebinin \u00f6ncelikle \u0130nfaz Kurumu taraf\u0131ndan de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011fi belirtilerek usulden reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
18. \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi taraf\u0131ndan verilen karar do\u011frultusunda \u0130nfaz Kurumu taraf\u0131ndan al\u0131nacak karar \u00fczerine \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine ba\u015fvurulmas\u0131 gerekmektedir. \u0130dari ve yarg\u0131sal yollar\u0131n usul\u00fcne uygun olarak t\u00fcketildikten sonra bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunulmas\u0131 gerekmektedir (\u0130.A., B. No: 2018\/35763, 12\/1\/2022 \u00a7 20). Somut olayda, \u0130.A. karar\u0131nda var\u0131lan sonu\u00e7tan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren bir durum olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finden, ba\u015fvurunun ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M <\/p>\n
19. Ba\u015fvurucu; ihlalin tespiti ve 1.000.000 TL manevi tazminat talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
20. COVID-19 salg\u0131n\u0131 d\u00f6nemindeki k\u0131s\u0131tlamalar ortadan kalkt\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ihlalin ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
21. Eski h\u00e2le getirme kural\u0131 \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde ihlalin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n b\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcyle ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in ba\u015fvurucuya manevi zararlar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda net 30.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00f6denmesine karar verilmesi gerekti\u011fi kanaatine ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Adli yard\u0131m talebinin KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n
B. 1. Aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n e\u015fle mahrem g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f talebi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
2. Aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerin k\u0131s\u0131tlanmas\u0131 nedeniyle ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
C. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 20. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. Ba\u015fvurucuya net 30.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE, tazminata ili\u015fkin di\u011fer taleplerin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. 30.000 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinden olu\u015fan yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvurucuya \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE<\/p>\n
F. \u00d6demenin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
G. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 20\/11\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 20\/11\/2024 tarihli ve 2020\/37022 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u0130BRAH\u0130M BA\u015ePINAR BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/37022) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 20\/11\/2024 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM \u00a0 \u00a0 R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7 \u00a0 \u00a0 Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR Raport\u00f6r : Erdem Ender \u00c7INAR Ba\u015fvurucu : \u0130brahim BA\u015ePINAR Vekili : Av. Ay\u015fe S\u00fceda \u00dcNAL \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, koronavir\u00fcs salg\u0131n\u0131na y\u00f6nelik tedbirler kapsam\u0131nda ceza infaz kurumundaki g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerin k\u0131s\u0131tlanmas\u0131 ile e\u015f g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc yapt\u0131r\u0131lmamas\u0131 nedeniyle aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n, dilek\u00e7elerine i\u015flem yap\u0131lmamas\u0131 nedeniyle etkili ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu, ba\u015fvuru tarihinde anayasal d\u00fczeni ortadan kald\u0131rmaya te\u015febb\u00fcs etme su\u00e7undan Sincan 2 No.lu F Tipi Y\u00fcksek G\u00fcvenlikli Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumunda (\u0130nfaz Kurumu) tutuklu olarak bulunmaktad\u0131r. 3. Ba\u015fvurucu, koronavir\u00fcs (COVID-19) salg\u0131n\u0131 nedeniyle g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerin s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 uygulamas\u0131 ve e\u015f g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc yapt\u0131r\u0131lmamas\u0131 nedeniyle 9\/9\/2020 tarihinde Ankara Bat\u0131 2. \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine (\u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi) ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur. \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi 30\/9\/2020 tarihli karar\u0131yla ba\u015fvuruyu reddetmi\u015ftir. Kararda e\u015f g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc y\u00f6n\u00fcnden \u0130nfaz Kurumu taraf\u0131ndan al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f bir karar bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan konu hakk\u0131nda karar al\u0131nmak \u00fczere dilek\u00e7enin \u0130nfaz Kurumuna g\u00f6nderilmesi gerekti\u011fini, salg\u0131n hastal\u0131k nedeniyle yap\u0131lan uygulaman\u0131n usule ve kanuna uygun oldu\u011funu belirtmi\u015ftir. 4. Ba\u015fvurucu, \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011finin karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 8\/10\/2020 tarihinde Ankara Bat\u0131 1. A\u011f\u0131r …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27,535],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-21514","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber","category-uncategorized-tr"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n