T.C.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay<\/p>\n
15. Ceza Dairesi<\/p>\n
2017\/14631 E., 2019\/305 K.<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
MAHKEMES\u0130 :A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi
\nSU\u00c7 : Nitelikli Doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k
\nH\u00dcK\u00dcM : Beraat (ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131)<\/p>\n
Nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7undan san\u0131klar\u0131n beraatine ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcmler kat\u0131lan vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmekle dosya incelenerek gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc;
\nSan\u0131klar\u0131n, kat\u0131landan ald\u0131klar\u0131 karpuz kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda 27.500 TL de\u011ferinde ve ger\u00e7ek olan bir \u00e7ek ile yine ger\u00e7ek olan bir senet verdikleri, \u00e7ek ve senet bedelinin \u00f6deme g\u00fcn\u00fcnde \u00f6denmemesi \u00fczerine, san\u0131klar\u0131n, su\u00e7a konu 70.000 TL bedelli sahte \u00e7eki kat\u0131lana verdikleri, bu \u015fekilde nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unu i\u015flediklerinin iddia edildi\u011fi olayda, ayr\u0131nt\u0131lar\u0131 Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulunun 03\/03\/1998 tarih ve 6\/ 8-69 E. K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda da a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere, \u00f6nceden do\u011fmu\u015f bir bor\u00e7 i\u00e7in hileli davran\u0131\u015flarda bulunulmas\u0131 halinde, zarar veya bor\u00e7 kand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 nitelikte davran\u0131\u015flar sonucu do\u011fmayaca\u011f\u0131ndan doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unun unsurlar\u0131 itibariyle olu\u015fmayaca\u011f\u0131 dikkate al\u0131narak, bu gerek\u00e7elere dayanan mahkemenin kabul\u00fcnde bir isabetsizlik bulunmam\u0131\u015f, san\u0131klar\u0131n ba\u015ftan itibaren doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k kast\u0131yla hareket etmedikleri, su\u00e7a konu sahte \u00e7eki, kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131 s\u00f6zle\u015fme ili\u015fkisi kurulmas\u0131ndan sonra kat\u0131lana ibraz ettiklerinin anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda tebli\u011fnamedeki bozma isteyen d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnceye i\u015ftirak edilmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Bozmaya uyularak yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda, y\u00fcklenen su\u00e7un unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6sterilerek mahkemece kabul ve takdir k\u0131l\u0131nm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fundan, kat\u0131lan vekilinin, beraat h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funa ve eylemin su\u00e7 te\u015fkil etti\u011fine ili\u015fkin temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddiyle h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin ONANMASINA, 04\/02\/2019 tarihinde oy\u00e7oklu\u011fuyla karar verildi.<\/p>\n
Kar\u015f\u0131 Oy<\/p>\n
M\u00fc\u015fteki ……’in 12\/05\/2009 tarihli celsede “Karpuz d\u00f6neminde … ve o\u011flu … tarlaya geldiler. Kendileri birlikte 72.000<\/p>\n
TL’lik karpuz sat\u0131n ald\u0131lar. Gelirken yanlar\u0131nda o\u011flu …’a ait bo\u015f \u00e7ek
\nko\u00e7an\u0131 ile geldiler. Kendileri \u00e7eki d\u00fczenleyip verdiler. … imzalad\u0131, bana verdi. \u00c7ekli birlikte bana senet de verilmi\u015fti. \u00c7ekin \u00f6deme g\u00fcn\u00fc geldi\u011finde Serkan ve … benim yan\u0131ma evime gelerek 2000 TL den vazge\u00e7memi s\u00f6ylediler. Daha \u00f6nce verdikleri 27.500 TL lik \u00e7eki ve senedi alarak bana 70.000 TL lik \u00e7ek verdiler. 70.000 TL lik \u00e7ek doluydu. Tamam\u0131yla d\u00fczenlenmi\u015fti ve birka\u00e7 ciro da vard\u0131. \u00c7ekin g\u00fcn\u00fc geldi\u011finde bankaya birinci g\u00fcn gittim. Bankadaki hesap m\u00fcsait olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan \u00e7ekemedim. \u0130kinci g\u00fcn tekrar, \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc g\u00fcn tekrar gittim. \u00dc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc g\u00fcn tekrar gitti\u011fimde banka g\u00f6revlilerinden \u00e7ekin arkas\u0131n\u0131 yazmalar\u0131n\u0131 istedim. \u00c7ek yaz\u0131l\u0131rken ilk ke\u015fidecinin numaras\u0131ndan banka g\u00f6revlileri g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc. Ke\u015fideci b\u00f6yle bir \u00e7ekinin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00e7ek ko\u00e7an\u0131n\u0131n elinde yazd\u0131r\u0131lmadan bekledi\u011fini s\u00f6yledi. Bunun \u00fczerine banka g\u00f6revlileri de polislere haber verdi ve olay ortaya \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131. Daha sonradan da hi\u00e7bir \u015fekilde \u00f6deme yap\u0131lmad\u0131.” beyan\u0131 tan\u0131k …’nun 23\/07\/2009 tarihli oturumda orta\u011f\u0131 ve kom\u015fusu olan kat\u0131lan …’in yan\u0131na gelen san\u0131klar … ve Serkan’\u0131n \u00f6nceden verdikleri senet ve \u00e7eki isteyerek ve yeni verecekleri \u00e7ekin vadesinin yak\u0131n olmas\u0131 ve \u00fczerindeki 70.000 liral\u0131k bedeli de dikkate alarak 2.000 lira indirim yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 talep edip de\u011fi\u015fim yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 do\u011frulayan anlat\u0131m\u0131, iddianame, g\u00f6revsizlik karar\u0131 ve b\u00fct\u00fcn dosya kapsam\u0131 birlikte de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde;<\/p>\n
San\u0131klar … ve …’\u0131n fikir ve eylem birli\u011fi i\u00e7erisinde karpuz yeti\u015ftiricili\u011fi yapan kat\u0131lan …’in yan\u0131na gelerek 72.000 liral\u0131k karpuz sat\u0131n al\u0131p kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda \u00f6nce \u00e7ek ve senet verdikleri, bu belgelerin sahteli\u011fi hususunnda bir iddia e tesbitin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, muhtemelen san\u0131klar\u0131n kat\u0131lan taraf\u0131n kararla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lan vade g\u00fcn\u00fcne kadar \u015f\u00fcphesini \u00e7ekmemeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131, \u00f6deme i\u00e7in belirlenen vade tarihi geldi\u011finde ayn\u0131 san\u0131klar\u0131n kat\u0131lanan yan\u0131na gelerek sahteli\u011fi sabit olan 70.000 liral\u0131k \u00e7eki verip \u00f6nceki senet ve \u00e7ekin iadesini istedikleri, ayr\u0131ca bedelle uyumlu olmas\u0131 i\u00e7inde sahte \u00e7ekteki ke\u015fide tarihinin yak\u0131n olmas\u0131 gibi bir g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcr sebeple 2.000 lira indirim yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flad\u0131klar\u0131, bu \u015fekilde ba\u015ftan beri \u00f6deme ama\u00e7lar\u0131 olmaks\u0131z\u0131n kat\u0131lan\u0131 oyalay\u0131c\u0131 davran\u0131\u015f g\u00f6sterdikleri, bu haliyle \u00f6nceden do\u011fmu\u015f bir bor\u00e7tan bahsedilemeyece\u011fi, yeni bir belge ve hatta sahte \u00e7ekteki bedelle uyum sa\u011flatmak i\u00e7in bir miktarda indirim yapt\u0131rarak bor\u00e7 yenilenmesi i\u015fleminin ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011fi, san\u0131klar\u0131n at\u0131l\u0131 nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan mahkumiyetleri gerekti\u011fi, yerel mahkeme h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn bu sebeple bozulmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi kanaat ve de\u011ferlendirmesiyle say\u0131n \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011fun g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kat\u0131lmamaktay\u0131m.<\/p>\n
\u200bYarg\u0131tay 15. Ceza Dairesi\u2019nin 04.02.2019 tarihli, 2017\/14631 E. ve 2019\/305 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 15. Ceza Dairesi 2017\/14631 E., 2019\/305 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” MAHKEMES\u0130 :A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi SU\u00c7 : Nitelikli Doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k H\u00dcK\u00dcM : Beraat (ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131) Nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7undan san\u0131klar\u0131n beraatine ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcmler kat\u0131lan vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmekle dosya incelenerek gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc; San\u0131klar\u0131n, kat\u0131landan ald\u0131klar\u0131 karpuz kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda 27.500 TL de\u011ferinde ve ger\u00e7ek olan bir \u00e7ek ile yine ger\u00e7ek olan bir senet verdikleri, \u00e7ek ve senet bedelinin \u00f6deme g\u00fcn\u00fcnde \u00f6denmemesi \u00fczerine, san\u0131klar\u0131n, su\u00e7a konu 70.000 TL bedelli sahte \u00e7eki kat\u0131lana verdikleri, bu \u015fekilde nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unu i\u015flediklerinin iddia edildi\u011fi olayda, ayr\u0131nt\u0131lar\u0131 Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulunun 03\/03\/1998 tarih ve 6\/ 8-69 E. K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda da a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere, \u00f6nceden do\u011fmu\u015f bir bor\u00e7 i\u00e7in hileli davran\u0131\u015flarda bulunulmas\u0131 halinde, zarar veya bor\u00e7 kand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 nitelikte davran\u0131\u015flar sonucu do\u011fmayaca\u011f\u0131ndan doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7unun unsurlar\u0131 itibariyle olu\u015fmayaca\u011f\u0131 dikkate al\u0131narak, bu gerek\u00e7elere dayanan mahkemenin kabul\u00fcnde bir isabetsizlik bulunmam\u0131\u015f, san\u0131klar\u0131n ba\u015ftan itibaren doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k kast\u0131yla hareket etmedikleri, su\u00e7a konu sahte \u00e7eki, kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131 s\u00f6zle\u015fme ili\u015fkisi kurulmas\u0131ndan sonra kat\u0131lana ibraz ettiklerinin anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda tebli\u011fnamedeki bozma isteyen d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnceye i\u015ftirak edilmemi\u015ftir. Bozmaya uyularak yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda, y\u00fcklenen su\u00e7un unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6sterilerek mahkemece kabul ve takdir k\u0131l\u0131nm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fundan, kat\u0131lan vekilinin, beraat h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funa ve eylemin su\u00e7 te\u015fkil etti\u011fine ili\u015fkin temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddiyle h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin ONANMASINA, 04\/02\/2019 tarihinde …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-152804","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n