T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
A.B. BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2019\/2230)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 12\/6\/2024<\/p>\n
R.G. Tarih ve Say\u0131: 8\/11\/2024-32716<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
RESEN G\u0130ZL\u0130L\u0130K KARARI VER\u0130LD\u0130<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Muhammed Cemil KANDEM\u0130R<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
A.B.<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Muhammed Feyzi AYG\u00dcN<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru; devlet memurlu\u011fundan \u00e7\u0131karma disiplin cezas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lan davada disiplin i\u015flemine konu eyleme ili\u015fkin ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 sonucunda verilen beraat karar\u0131n\u0131n dikkate al\u0131nmamas\u0131 ve ba\u015fvurucunun disiplin cezas\u0131 almas\u0131na sebep olan g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmelerin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 hatt\u0131 kendisinin kullanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddialar\u0131n\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131lanmamas\u0131 nedeniyle gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucu, Mezitli Toplum Sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Merkezinde ebe olarak g\u00f6rev yapmaktayken 14\/7\/1965 tarihli ve 657 say\u0131l\u0131 Devlet Memurlar\u0131 Kanunu’nun 125. maddesinin E bendinin (g) alt bendi uyar\u0131nca Sa\u011fl\u0131k Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Y\u00fcksek Disiplin Kurulunun 16\/2\/2011 tarihli karar\u0131yla devlet memurlu\u011fundan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fvurucu s\u00f6z konusu i\u015flemin iptali ve i\u015flem nedeniyle u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131 maddi zararlar\u0131n\u0131n tazmini talebiyle dava a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Mersin 2. \u0130dare Mahkemesi (Mahkeme) 4\/11\/2015 tarihli karar\u0131yla davay\u0131 reddetmi\u015ftir. Mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7esi \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“…soru\u015fturma raporunda; ‘Mersin Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131’n\u0131n E:2009\/7190 esas ve 2009\/4221 nolu iddianamenin ‘\u015e\u00fcphelilerin \u00d6rg\u00fct \u0130\u00e7indeki Konumlar\u0131 ve Eylemleri’ ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 k\u0131sm\u0131nda \u015f\u00fcpheli [M.A.n\u0131n] ifadesine ba\u015fvuruldu\u011fu ve ifadesinde davac\u0131n\u0131n hem\u015fire oldu\u011funu bildi\u011fini, bu bayan\u0131n para kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 fuhu\u015f yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kad\u0131n pazarlad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve davac\u0131n\u0131n emniyetteki dostunun makam\u0131na g\u00fcvenerek kendisinden fuhu\u015f yapan kad\u0131n istedi\u011fini beyan etti\u011fi, ayr\u0131ca bahse konu iddianamede, davac\u0131 hakk\u0131nda hiyerar\u015fik yap\u0131 i\u00e7inde yer almamakla birlikte \u00f6rg\u00fct ad\u0131na su\u00e7 say\u0131lan eylemleri ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla su\u00e7 i\u015flemek amac\u0131yla kurulan \u00f6rg\u00fcte \u00fcye konumunda oldu\u011fu, \u00f6rg\u00fct faaliyetleri kapsam\u0131nda fuhu\u015f amac\u0131yla yer temin etti\u011fi, fuh\u015fa arac\u0131l\u0131k ve te\u015fvik etti\u011fi, bunlar\u0131n yollar\u0131n\u0131 kolayla\u015ft\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u00f6rg\u00fct i\u00e7erisinde yer alan \u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyesi[M.A.dan] kendisinin i\u015fletmecili\u011fini yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ‘[C.] Bar’ isimli i\u015fletmeye gelen m\u00fc\u015fteriler i\u00e7in fuhu\u015f ama\u00e7l\u0131 ‘sermaye’ olarak tabir edilen bayan istedi\u011fi ve fuh\u015fa arac\u0131l\u0131k etti\u011fi ifadelerine yer verildi\u011fi, davac\u0131ya ait telefon kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n mahkeme karar\u0131 ile dinlemeye al\u0131nmas\u0131 sonucunda telefon kay\u0131tlar\u0131nda davac\u0131n\u0131n, ‘\u0130ki tane aptal var b\u00f6yle g\u00fcl\u00fcp eylenmek isteyen k\u0131z yok mu, ikisi de t\u00fcccar birinin petrol\u00fc var hem her halde yeri var, hem narenciyeci ikisi de ayn\u0131 b.k gibi paras\u0131 var’, ‘Ne yapt\u0131n lan ayarlayamad\u0131n m\u0131 kimseyi, ayarlarsan haberim olsun adamlar burada’ gibi c\u00fcmlelerin ge\u00e7ti\u011fi, ayr\u0131ca erkek \u015fah\u0131slarla konu\u015fmalar\u0131nda genellikle kad\u0131n ayarlamas\u0131 ile ilgili ifadelerin ‘How much’ gibi fiyat sormalar\u0131n\u0131n ve 300-400-500 gibi miktar belirtmelerinin kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, … hi\u00e7 tan\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131 erkeklere fuhu\u015f ama\u00e7l\u0131 kad\u0131nlar temin etmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu davran\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131n toplumda yerle\u015fmi\u015f ahlaki de\u011ferlere ayk\u0131r\u0131, adap ve aile d\u00fczenini tahribe y\u00f6nelik bir fiil oldu\u011fu ve fiilin 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu’nun ‘Genel Ahlaka Kar\u015f\u0131 Su\u00e7lar’ ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 alt\u0131nda d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi, Mersin \u0130li, Mezitli … Sa\u011fl\u0131k Oca\u011f\u0131’nda g\u00f6revli ebe olarak g\u00f6rev yapan davac\u0131n\u0131n Devlet memurlu\u011fu s\u0131fat\u0131 ile ba\u011fda\u015fmayan nitelikte utan\u00e7 verici davran\u0131\u015flarda bulundu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, davac\u0131 hakk\u0131nda 657 say\u0131l\u0131 Devlet Memurlar\u0131 Kanunu’nun 125. maddesinin E\/g f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fince Devlet memurlu\u011fundan \u00e7\u0131karma cezas\u0131yla tecziye edilmesi gerekece\u011fi’ y\u00f6n\u00fcnde getirilen teklif do\u011frultusunda dava konusu16.02.2011 tarih ve 2011\/I-3 say\u0131l\u0131 Y\u00fcksek Disiplin Kurulu Karar\u0131 ile davac\u0131n\u0131n Devlet memurlu\u011fundan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lma cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, an\u0131lan i\u015flemin iptali istemiyle g\u00f6r\u00fclmekte olan i\u015fbu davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Bak\u0131lan davada, dava konusu i\u015flemin dayana\u011f\u0131 olan soru\u015fturma raporu ve eki ifade tutanaklar\u0131 ile mahkeme kararlar\u0131 sonras\u0131nda tutanak alt\u0131na al\u0131nan telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n birlikte de\u011ferlendirilmesinden, davac\u0131ya isnat edilen fiilin s\u00fcbuta erdi\u011fi veMemurluk s\u0131fat\u0131 ile ba\u011fda\u015fmayacak nitelik ve derecede y\u00fcz k\u0131zart\u0131c\u0131 ve utan\u00e7 verici mahiyette oldu\u011fu sonu\u00e7 ve kanaatine var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.” <\/p>\n
4. Mahkeme karar\u0131, Dan\u0131\u015ftay Onikinci Dairesinin 21\/2\/2017 tarihli karar\u0131yla ayr\u0131 bir gerek\u00e7e belirtilmeksizin onanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucunun karar d\u00fczeltme istemi de ayn\u0131 Dairenin 13\/11\/2018 tarihli karar\u0131yla reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda su\u00e7 i\u015flemek amac\u0131yla kurulan \u00f6rg\u00fcte \u00fcye olma, bir kimseyi fuhu\u015fa te\u015fvik etme veya yapt\u0131rma veya arac\u0131l\u0131k etme veya yer temin etme su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan Mersin 2. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinde (Ceza Mahkemesi) dava a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ceza Mahkemesinin 29\/4\/2016 tarihli karar\u0131yla \u00f6rg\u00fct ad\u0131na su\u00e7 i\u015fleme su\u00e7undan ba\u015fvurucunun beraatine karar verildi\u011fi ve bu karar\u0131n temyiz edilmeden 9\/5\/2016 tarihinde kesinle\u015fti\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
6. Ba\u015fvurucu; ceza davas\u0131nda verilen karar\u0131, temyize ili\u015fkin karar verilmeden \u00f6nce 12\/5\/2016 tarihinde Dan\u0131\u015ftaya sunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
7. Ba\u015fvurucu, nihai karar\u0131 19\/12\/2018 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frenmi\u015f; 16\/1\/2019 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME <\/p>\n
8. Her ne kadar ba\u015fvuru formunda ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 ile ilgisi olan iddialara da yer verildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclmekte ise de bak\u0131lmakta olan bireysel ba\u015fvurunun konusunun disiplin cezas\u0131na ili\u015fkin mahkeme karar\u0131 oldu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden an\u0131lan iddialar de\u011ferlendirilmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fvurucu; \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 fiillerin tek dayana\u011f\u0131 olan g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmelerin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 telefon hatt\u0131n\u0131 kendisinin kullanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131n\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131lanmamas\u0131 nedeniyle adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n, hakk\u0131nda kesinle\u015fmi\u015f bir yarg\u0131 karar\u0131 olmadan iddia niteli\u011findeki a\u00e7\u0131klamalara itibar edilerek kamu g\u00f6revinden \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131 ve ayn\u0131 iddialarla hakk\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131lan ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 sonucunda verilen beraat karar\u0131n\u0131n dikkate al\u0131nmamas\u0131 nedeniyle masumiyet karinesinin ihlal edildi\u011fini iddia etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
10. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde; Anayasa ve ilgili mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmleri, Anayasa Mahkemesi i\u00e7tihad\u0131 ve somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi ifade edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 verdi\u011fi cevapta, benzer nitelikteki kararlara g\u00f6re hakk\u0131nda verilen beraat karar\u0131n\u0131n dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
11. Anayasa Mahkemesi, olaylar\u0131n ba\u015fvurucu taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan hukuki nitelendirmesi ile ba\u011fl\u0131 olmay\u0131p olay ve olgular\u0131n hukuki tavsifini kendisi takdir eder. Ba\u015fvurucunun \u015fik\u00e2yetlerinin \u00f6z\u00fcn\u00fcn ilk derece mahkemesi ve temyiz a\u015famas\u0131nda ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc iddialar\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131lanmamas\u0131na ili\u015fkin oldu\u011fundan ba\u015fvuru, gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
12. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
13. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 36. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131 g\u00fcvencesini de kapsamaktad\u0131r (daha geni\u015f de\u011ferlendirme i\u00e7in bkz. Abdullah Top\u00e7u, B. No: 2014\/8868, 19\/4\/2017, \u00a7 75). Nitekim Anayasa’n\u0131n 141. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda \u201cB\u00fct\u00fcn mahkemelerin her t\u00fcrl\u00fc kararlar\u0131 gerek\u00e7eli olarak yaz\u0131l\u0131r.\u201d denilerek mahkemelere kararlar\u0131n\u0131 gerek\u00e7eli yazma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc y\u00fcklenmi\u015ftir. Mahkemelerin an\u0131lan y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, yarg\u0131lamada ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen her t\u00fcrl\u00fc iddia ve savunmaya karar gerek\u00e7esinde ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 yan\u0131t vermesi gerekti\u011fi \u015feklinde anla\u015f\u0131lamaz. Ancak mahkemeler, kendilerine sunulan t\u00fcm iddialara yan\u0131t vermek zorunda de\u011filse de (Yasemin Ek\u015fi, B. No: 2013\/5486, 4\/12\/2013, \u00a7 56)davan\u0131n esas sorunlar\u0131n\u0131 inceledikleri gerek\u00e7eli karardan anla\u015f\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. Bir kararda tam olarak hangi unsurlar\u0131n bulunmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi davan\u0131n niteli\u011fine ve \u015fartlar\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r. Muhakeme s\u0131ras\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131k ve somut bir bi\u00e7imde \u00f6ne s\u00fcr\u00fclen iddia ve savunmalar\u0131n davan\u0131n sonucuna etkili, ba\u015fka bir deyi\u015fle davan\u0131n sonucunu de\u011fi\u015ftirebilecek nitelikte olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde davayla do\u011frudan ilgili olan bu hususlara mahkemeler makul bir gerek\u00e7e ile yan\u0131t verilmelidir (Sencer Ba\u015fat ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2013\/7800, 18\/6\/2014, \u00a7 35). Aksi bir tutumla mahkemenin davan\u0131n sonucuna etkili oldu\u011funu kabul etti\u011fi bir husus hakk\u0131nda ilgili ve yeterli bir yan\u0131t vermemesi veya yan\u0131t vermeyi gerektiren usul ya da esasa dair iddialar\u0131 cevaps\u0131z b\u0131rakmas\u0131 hak ihlaline neden olabilecektir (Sencer Ba\u015fat ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 39).<\/p>\n
14. Cezai sorumlulu\u011funun bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespit edilmi\u015f veya ceza sorumlulu\u011fu ortadan kalkm\u0131\u015f olsa dahi ayn\u0131 olaylar nedeniyle -daha hafif bir ispat k\u00fclfeti temelinde- ki\u015fi hakk\u0131nda ba\u015fka t\u00fcr bir sorumlulu\u011fun tesis edilmesinin \u00f6n\u00fcnde bir engel bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Bu ba\u011flamda ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131na konu maddi olay ve olgular\u0131n disiplin hukuku esaslar\u0131 \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde di\u011fer kamu makamlar\u0131nca (idari\/adli) ayr\u0131ca de\u011ferlendirilmesi ve bu de\u011ferlendirme sonucunda ula\u015f\u0131lacak kanaate g\u00f6re i\u015flem\/karar tesis edilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr (benzer y\u00f6ndeki de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7in bkz. \u00d6zcan Pekta\u015f, B. No: 2013\/6879, 2\/12\/2015, \u00a7 25; K\u00fcr\u015fat Eyol, \u00a7 30, Galip \u015eahin, \u00a7 48).<\/p>\n
15. Somut olayda ba\u015fvurucunun disiplin cezas\u0131 almas\u0131na sebep olan g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmelerin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 hatt\u0131 kendisinin kullanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131 yarg\u0131lama mercilerince de\u011ferlendirilmemi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n verildi\u011fi tarihte ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda ayn\u0131 fiilden dolay\u0131 ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 devam etmektedir. Ba\u015fvurucunun temyiz a\u015famas\u0131nda Ceza Mahkemesince verilen beraat karar\u0131n\u0131 sunmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen Dan\u0131\u015ftay taraf\u0131ndan mahkeme karar\u0131 ayr\u0131 bir gerek\u00e7e belirtilmeksizin oy\u00e7oklu\u011fu ile onanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Temyiz karar\u0131n\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131oyunda, ba\u015fvurucuya isnat edilen fiillerin s\u00fcbuta erdi\u011fine ili\u015fkin olarak soru\u015fturma raporunda yeterli somut tespitler bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve ba\u015fvurucunun ayn\u0131 fiil nedeniyle yap\u0131lan ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131nda beraat etti\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan i\u015flemin iptaline karar verilmesi gerekti\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne yer verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
16. Bu itibarla ba\u015fvurucunun disiplin cezas\u0131 almas\u0131na sebep olan g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmelerin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 hatt\u0131 kendisinin kullanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131n\u0131n ilgili ve yeterli bir gerek\u00e7eyle kar\u015f\u0131lanmamas\u0131 ve temyiz a\u015famas\u0131nda sundu\u011fu Ceza Mahkemesince verilen beraat karar\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmemesi gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlaline yol a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
17. Di\u011fer taraftan bu ihlal karar\u0131n\u0131n davan\u0131n esas\u0131yla ilgili herhangi bir de\u011ferlendirme i\u00e7ermedi\u011fi vurgulanmal\u0131d\u0131r. Zira gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131, taraflara yarg\u0131lama s\u0131ras\u0131nda ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fckleri iddialar\u0131n\u0131n kurallara uygun bi\u00e7imde incelenip incelenmedi\u011fini bilmelerine imk\u00e2n sa\u011flayan bir hak olup yarg\u0131lama sonucuna y\u00f6nelik bir teminat sa\u011flamaz. Bu itibarla Anayasa Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da belirtti\u011fi ihlal gerek\u00e7elerini g\u00f6zeterek ve s\u00f6z konusu iddiayla ilgili yeniden bir de\u011ferlendirme yaparak gereken karar\u0131 vermek yine yarg\u0131lama mercilerinin takdirindedir.<\/p>\n
18. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
19. Ba\u015fvurucu; ayr\u0131ca disiplin soru\u015fturmas\u0131nda tan\u0131k dinletme talebinin kabul edilmemesi ve savunmas\u0131n\u0131n eksik al\u0131nmas\u0131 nedeniyle savunma ve adil yarg\u0131lanma haklar\u0131n\u0131n ve e\u015fitlik ilkesinin ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131 \u015fik\u00e2yeti y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ula\u015f\u0131lan sonu\u00e7 g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde ba\u015fvurucunun bu iddialar\u0131n\u0131n ayr\u0131ca incelenmesine gerek g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M <\/p>\n
20. Ba\u015fvurucu, ihlalin tespiti ile maddi ve manevi tazminat talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
21. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamda karar\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi yarg\u0131 mercilerince yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden yarg\u0131lama i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flatmak ve Anayasa Mahkemesini ihlal sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131ran nedenleri gideren, ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere uygun yeni bir karar vermektir (Mehmet Do\u011fan [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n
22. \u0130hlalin ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n yeterli bir giderim sa\u011flayaca\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan tazminat taleplerinin reddine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Kamuya a\u00e7\u0131k belgelerde ba\u015fvurucunun kimli\u011finin RESEN G\u0130ZL\u0130 TUTULMASINA,<\/p>\n
B. Gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
C. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere Mersin 2. \u0130dare Mahkemesine (E.2011\/537, K.2015\/1520) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. Ba\u015fvurucunun tazminat taleplerinin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
F. 364,60 TL har\u00e7 ve 18.800 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinden olu\u015fan toplam19.164,60 TL yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvurucuya \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
G. \u00d6demenin, karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
H. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 12\/6\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 12\/6\/2024 tarihli ve 2019\/2230 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 A.B. BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2019\/2230) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 12\/6\/2024 R.G. Tarih ve Say\u0131: 8\/11\/2024-32716 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR RESEN G\u0130ZL\u0130L\u0130K KARARI VER\u0130LD\u0130 Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM \u00a0 \u00a0 R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7 \u00a0 \u00a0 Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR Raport\u00f6r : Muhammed Cemil KANDEM\u0130R Ba\u015fvurucu : A.B. Vekili : Av. Muhammed Feyzi AYG\u00dcN \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru; devlet memurlu\u011fundan \u00e7\u0131karma disiplin cezas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lan davada disiplin i\u015flemine konu eyleme ili\u015fkin ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 sonucunda verilen beraat karar\u0131n\u0131n dikkate al\u0131nmamas\u0131 ve ba\u015fvurucunun disiplin cezas\u0131 almas\u0131na sebep olan g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmelerin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 hatt\u0131 kendisinin kullanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddialar\u0131n\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131lanmamas\u0131 nedeniyle gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu, Mezitli Toplum Sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Merkezinde ebe olarak g\u00f6rev yapmaktayken 14\/7\/1965 tarihli ve 657 say\u0131l\u0131 Devlet Memurlar\u0131 Kanunu’nun 125. maddesinin E bendinin (g) alt bendi uyar\u0131nca Sa\u011fl\u0131k Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Y\u00fcksek Disiplin Kurulunun 16\/2\/2011 tarihli karar\u0131yla devlet memurlu\u011fundan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 3. Ba\u015fvurucu s\u00f6z konusu i\u015flemin iptali ve i\u015flem nedeniyle u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131 maddi zararlar\u0131n\u0131n tazmini talebiyle dava a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Mersin 2. \u0130dare Mahkemesi (Mahkeme) 4\/11\/2015 tarihli karar\u0131yla davay\u0131 reddetmi\u015ftir. Mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7esi \u015f\u00f6yledir: “…soru\u015fturma raporunda; ‘Mersin Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131’n\u0131n E:2009\/7190 esas ve 2009\/4221 nolu iddianamenin ‘\u015e\u00fcphelilerin \u00d6rg\u00fct \u0130\u00e7indeki Konumlar\u0131 ve …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27,535],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14482","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber","category-uncategorized-tr"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n