T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
ABDULKAD\u0130R \u00c7EV\u0130K VE D\u0130\u011eERLER\u0130 BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/6156)<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 30\/4\/2025<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
Metin KIRATLI<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Volkan \u00c7AKMAK<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucular<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
1. Abdulkadir \u00c7EV\u0130K<\/p>\n
2. Ali \u00c7EV\u0130K<\/p>\n
3. Aynur G\u00dcLM\u00dc\u015e<\/p>\n
4. G\u00fcll\u00fc \u00c7EV\u0130K<\/p>\n
5. Hasibe DEM\u0130RCAN<\/p>\n
6. \u0130pek \u00c7EV\u0130K<\/p>\n
7. Mehmet \u00c7EV\u0130K<\/p>\n
8. Mehmet Selim \u00c7EV\u0130K<\/p>\n
9. Mehmet \u015eah \u00c7EV\u0130K<\/p>\n
10. Remziye \u00c7EV\u0130K<\/p>\n
11. Sevdet YILMAZ<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Muhammet Polat \u0130\u00c7TEN<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 <\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, ceza infaz kurumunda meydana gelen \u00f6l\u00fcm nedeniyle ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n yak\u0131n\u0131 (G\u00fcll\u00fc \u00c7evik’in e\u015fi di\u011fer ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n ise babas\u0131) \u00d6.\u00c7. Diyarbak\u0131r 2 No.lu T Tipi Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumunda silahla ya\u011fma ve ki\u015fiyi h\u00fcrriyetinden yoksun k\u0131lma su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 hapis cezas\u0131 nedeniyle h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc olarak bulunmaktayken 20\/3\/2019 tarihinde saat 11.00 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda rahats\u0131zlanm\u0131\u015f ve kald\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 sa\u011fl\u0131k kurumunda vefat etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
3. \u00d6.\u00c7.nin daha \u00f6nce d\u00fczenli takibinin yap\u0131lmas\u0131 kayd\u0131yla ceza tehirine gerek olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde 29\/6\/2018 tarihli ve ceza infaz kurumunda tek ba\u015f\u0131na hayat\u0131n\u0131 idame ettirebilece\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde d\u00fczenlenen 4\/2\/2019 tarihli t\u0131bbi raporlar temelinde cezas\u0131n\u0131n infaz\u0131na ara verilmesi talepleri 19\/7\/2018 ve 11\/3\/2019 tarihlerinde reddedilmi\u015ftir. \u00d6.\u00c7. 2018 ve 2019 y\u0131llar\u0131nda kurum ara\u00e7 ve gere\u00e7lerine zarar vermesi nedeniyle birden fazla kez olmak \u00fczere k\u0131sa s\u00fcreli h\u00fccre cezas\u0131 alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ayr\u0131ca 11\/9\/2013 tarihli t\u0131bbi rapor uyar\u0131nca \u00d6.\u00c7. %72 oran\u0131nda engelli olarak tespit edilmi\u015ftir. Raporda \u00d6.\u00c7.nin psikolojik olarak bipolar bozuklu\u011fu oldu\u011fu, kulak burun bo\u011faz, kardiyoloji bak\u0131m\u0131ndan da rahats\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131 oldu\u011fu belirtilmi\u015ftir.\u00d6.\u00c7. kurumda bulundu\u011fu s\u00fcre zarf\u0131nda birden fazla kez sa\u011fl\u0131k kurumunun farkl\u0131 birimlerine (fizik tedavi, genel cerrahi, a\u011f\u0131z di\u015f sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131, psikiyatri, g\u00f6\u011f\u00fcs hastal\u0131klar\u0131, acil) \u00e7e\u015fitli \u015fik\u00e2yetlerle (bel a\u011fr\u0131s\u0131, ast\u0131m, koah, nefes darl\u0131\u011f\u0131) sevk edilmi\u015ftir. Sa\u011fl\u0131k kurumu taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen 8\/8\/2018 tarihli t\u0131bbi belgelerde \u00d6.\u00c7. i\u00e7in solunum yetmezli\u011fi, akut bron\u015fit, kronik akci\u011fer hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131 tan\u0131s\u0131 yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve nebulizat\u00f6r (akci\u011ferin verimli nefes, ila\u00e7 almas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flayan cihaz) kullan\u0131m\u0131 \u00f6nerilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. Olay Tutana\u011f\u0131’na ve vukuat raporuna g\u00f6re \u00d6.\u00c7. 20\/3\/2019 tarihinde ge\u00e7ici-2 ko\u011fu\u015fundan al\u0131narak A-9 ko\u011fu\u015funa g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fclmek istenmi\u015f ancak zorluk \u00e7\u0131karm\u0131\u015f, kurum personelinin yard\u0131m\u0131yla saat 09.00 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda ko\u011fu\u015fa yerle\u015ftirilmi\u015ftir. Saat 10.49 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda ko\u011fu\u015ftan acil durum bildirimi gelmesi \u00fczerine saat 10.50’de kurum personeli ko\u011fu\u015fa intikal etmi\u015f ve ko\u011fu\u015ftaki di\u011fer mahpuslar\u0131n \u00d6.\u00c7.nin nabz\u0131n\u0131n atmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6ylemesi \u00fczerine kurum sa\u011fl\u0131k personeli saat 10.52’de \u00d6.\u00c7.yi kontrol ederek 112 Acil ekibini aram\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Kuruma saat 11.07’de gelen acil sa\u011fl\u0131k ekibi bir s\u00fcre \u00d6.\u00c7.ye m\u00fcdahale ettikten sonra saat 11.23’te \u00d6.\u00c7.nin sa\u011fl\u0131k kurumuna sevkini ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirmi\u015ftir. Sa\u011fl\u0131k kurumunda \u00d6.\u00c7.ye CPR (yeniden canland\u0131rma) uygulanm\u0131\u015f ancak kalp ritmi al\u0131namam\u0131\u015f ve \u00d6.\u00c7. saat 11.50’de hayat\u0131n\u0131 kaybetmi\u015ftir. Olay\u0131n akabinde kolluk g\u00f6revlileri Diyarbak\u0131r Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) haber vermi\u015f, savc\u0131n\u0131n talimatlar\u0131n\u0131 (tan\u0131k, kamera kayd\u0131 ara\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131, otopsi raporu) alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
5. Olay g\u00fcn\u00fc saat 15.00’de d\u00fczenlenen \u00d6l\u00fc Muayene ve Otopsi Tutana\u011f\u0131’nda \u00d6.\u00c7.nin v\u00fccudunun \u00e7e\u015fitli yerlerinde k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck \u00e7apta ekimoz ve i\u011fne izi bulundu\u011funun belirlendi\u011fi belirtilmi\u015f, \u00f6l\u00fcm nedeninin tespiti i\u00e7in evrak\u0131n ve al\u0131nan \u00f6rneklerin Adana Adli T\u0131p Grup Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6nderilmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Laboratuvar tahlillerinin elde edilmesinin ard\u0131ndan Adli T\u0131p Kurumu 1. Adli T\u0131p \u0130htisas Kurulu taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen 23\/9\/2019 tarihli raporda; d\u0131\u015f muayenede tespit edilen lezyonlar\u0131n yeri ve a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131 itibar\u0131yla \u00f6l\u00fcme sebep olacak nitelikte olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, i\u00e7 muayenede k\u0131r\u0131k ya da travma, organ, damar yaralanmas\u0131 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, b\u00fcnyede toksik maddeye rastlanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu ba\u011flamda ki\u015finin \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn travmatik tesirle veya zehirlenme ile ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011fi, kalp damar sisteminde mevcut bulgular (plak, fibrozis, konjesyon) dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda kronik akci\u011fer hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131 olan \u00d6.\u00c7.nin \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn kalp damar rahats\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucu meydana geldi\u011fi ifade edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. Ayn\u0131 kurumda h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc olarak bulunan M.A. 21\/3\/2019 tarihinde kurum arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011fa sundu\u011fu dilek\u00e7esinde birka\u00e7 kez yemek da\u011f\u0131tmak ve oday\u0131 temizlemek i\u00e7in ko\u011fu\u015fa girdi\u011finde \u00d6.\u00c7.nin kurum personeli taraf\u0131ndan darbedildi\u011fine \u015fahit oldu\u011funu belirtmi\u015ftir. Bir ba\u015fka mahpus C.B. de benzer bir dilek\u00e7e sunarak kurumda ge\u00e7ici odada \u00d6.\u00c7.nin d\u00f6v\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne \u015fahit oldu\u011funu beyan etmi\u015ftir. Kurum idaresi s\u00f6z konusu dilek\u00e7eleri M.A.n\u0131n daha \u00f6nce kurum i\u00e7 hizmetlerinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, M.A.n\u0131n ve C.B.nin olay \u00f6ncesi \u00d6.\u00c7.nin darbedildi\u011fine dair bir bildirimde bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, iddialar\u0131n\u0131n as\u0131ls\u0131z oldu\u011fu, C.B.nin hi\u00e7bir zaman ge\u00e7ici odada kalmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u00d6.\u00c7. ile hi\u00e7 kar\u015f\u0131la\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u00f6l\u00fcm olay\u0131ndan sonra kurumu karalamak i\u00e7in benzer dilek\u00e7eler verildi\u011fini belirterek Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011fa sunmu\u015ftur.C.B. ve M.A. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan al\u0131nan 10\/5\/2019 tarihli ifadelerinde \u00d6.\u00c7. ile ayn\u0131 ko\u011fu\u015fta kalmad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 ancak ortak alanlarda \u00d6.\u00c7.yi zaman zaman g\u00f6rd\u00fcklerini, \u00d6.\u00c7.nin psikolojik rahats\u0131zl\u0131klar\u0131 olan, etraf\u0131na rahats\u0131zl\u0131k veren biri oldu\u011funu, kurum personelince zaman zaman darbedildi\u011fini, s\u00fcrekli odas\u0131n\u0131n de\u011fi\u015ftirildi\u011fini, olay g\u00fcn\u00fc ise bir darp olay\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, \u00d6.\u00c7.nin o\u011flu olan ba\u015fvurucu Mehmet Selim \u00c7evik’in 24\/3\/2019 ve 31\/5\/2019 tarihinde \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i s\u0131fat\u0131yla ifadesini alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu; babas\u0131n\u0131n kimseyle s\u0131k\u0131nt\u0131s\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, \u00f6l\u00fcm sebebini bilmedi\u011fini, psikolojik rahats\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131 olan babas\u0131n\u0131n ayn\u0131 zamanda nefes darl\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00e7ekti\u011fini, ziyaretlerinde babas\u0131n\u0131 yaral\u0131 hatta yaralar\u0131na diki\u015f at\u0131lm\u0131\u015f \u015fekilde g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, sordu\u011funda ise babas\u0131n\u0131n “Di\u011fer mahpuslar beni d\u00f6vd\u00fcler.” dedi\u011fini, kurum personeli ile durumu payla\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ilgileneceklerini s\u00f6yledi\u011fini, kurum personelinin babas\u0131n\u0131 darbetti\u011fine dair bilgisi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, babas\u0131n\u0131n kalp rahats\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131 nedeniyle vefat etti\u011fini \u00f6\u011frendi\u011fini ancak kurum personelinin olay g\u00fcn\u00fcne dair ihmali oldu\u011funu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, babas\u0131n\u0131n durumu bilinmesine, hareketsiz olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen ge\u00e7 m\u00fcdahale edildi\u011fini, sorumlulardan \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i oldu\u011funu beyan etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. Kurum idaresi taraf\u0131ndan personel hakk\u0131nda disiplin soru\u015fturmas\u0131 ba\u015flat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Disiplin soru\u015fturmas\u0131 s\u00fcrecinde kurumda bulunan mahpuslar\u0131n ifadeleri, kurum personelinin de savunmas\u0131 al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Kurum personeli (toplam sekiz ki\u015fi) birbiriyle b\u00fcy\u00fck \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde \u00f6rt\u00fc\u015fen savunmalar\u0131nda \u00d6.\u00c7.nin problemli, psikolojik s\u0131k\u0131nt\u0131lar ya\u015fayan bir mahpus oldu\u011funu, \u00e7evresiyle iyi anla\u015famad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu nedenle odas\u0131n\u0131n zaman zaman de\u011fi\u015ftirildi\u011fini, kendisine y\u00f6nelik bir \u015fiddetin s\u00f6z konusu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, olay sabah\u0131 odas\u0131n\u0131n de\u011fi\u015ftirildi\u011fi esnada direndi\u011fini, koluna girilip ikna edilmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131larak yeni odas\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bir s\u00fcre sonra ko\u011fu\u015ftakilerin uyar\u0131s\u0131 ile rahats\u0131zland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6\u011frenildi\u011fini ve \u00d6.\u00c7.ye gereken m\u00fcdahalenin yap\u0131larak sa\u011fl\u0131k kurumuna sevk edildi\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
9. Disiplin soru\u015fturmas\u0131 s\u00fcrecinde \u00e7ok say\u0131da mahpusun ifadesi al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u0130fade veren mahpuslar genel olarak \u00d6.\u00c7.nin \u00e7evresiyle uyumsuz, personel d\u00e2hil etraf\u0131ndakilere rahats\u0131zl\u0131k veren (gece kap\u0131lara vuran), k\u00fcfreden, psikolojik s\u0131k\u0131nt\u0131lar\u0131 olan biri oldu\u011funu ifade etmi\u015ftir. Olay\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi ko\u011fu\u015fta kalan mahpuslar\u0131n (o s\u0131rada uyuyan, du\u015f alan, sporda olanlar hari\u00e7) hepsi \u00d6.\u00c7.nin ko\u011fu\u015fa getirildi\u011finde hareketsiz oldu\u011funu, tepki vermedi\u011fini, konu\u015fmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131na ra\u011fmen cevap alamad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, \u00d6.\u00c7.yi havaland\u0131rmada bir s\u00fcre sandalyede oturttuktan sonra yata\u011fa ald\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, yatakta a\u011fz\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k hareketsiz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fcnce kurum personeline haber verdiklerini belirtmi\u015ftir.Mahpus S.T., \u00d6.\u00c7. sabah ko\u011fu\u015fa ilk getirildi\u011finde onunla konu\u015fmak istedi\u011fini ancak tepki alamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, personeli uyard\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 “\u00d6l\u00fc adam getirmi\u015fsiniz.” dedi\u011fini, ba\u015fmemur ile konu\u015fmak istediklerinde kurum personelinin \u00d6.\u00c7. i\u00e7in “Numara yap\u0131yor.” dedi\u011fini ifade etmi\u015ftir. Di\u011fer mahpuslar Z.B., Z.K., A.S, M.\u0130. de S.T.nin beyan\u0131n\u0131 destekler ifadeler kullanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Disiplin soru\u015fturmas\u0131 sonunda kurum disiplin amirli\u011fi, personel hakk\u0131nda disiplin cezas\u0131n\u0131n tesisine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna ula\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u0130lgili evrak ve al\u0131nan ifadeler kurum idaresi taraf\u0131ndan Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011fa sunulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
10. Soru\u015fturma s\u00fcrecinde kamera kay\u0131tlar\u0131 incelenerek tutana\u011fa ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Tutana\u011fa g\u00f6re \u00d6.\u00c7. saat 09.04’te ko\u011fu\u015fa getirilmi\u015f, saat 09.21’e kadar sandalyede oturmu\u015f, daha sonra avluya sandalyeyle beraber ta\u015f\u0131nm\u0131\u015f, saat 10.47’ye kadar avluda sandalyede oturmu\u015f, saat 10.47’de sandalyeden indirilerek avluya getirilen yata\u011f\u0131n \u00fczerine al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f, saat 10.49’da di\u011fer mahpuslar taraf\u0131ndan nabz\u0131 kontrol edilerek kurum personeline haber verilmi\u015f, saat 10.50’de kurum personeli ko\u011fu\u015fa intikal etmi\u015f, kurum doktoruna haber verilmi\u015f, saat 10.52’de \u00d6.\u00c7. yatakla beraber ko\u011fu\u015ftan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
11. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k s\u00fcrecin sonunda kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar vermi\u015f; olay silsilesine ve elde edilen delillere yer verdi\u011fi 4\/11\/2020 tarihli karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde kronik akci\u011fer hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131 bulunan \u00d6.\u00c7.nin \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn kalp damar hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucu olu\u015ftu\u011funu, travmatik sebeple hayat\u0131n\u0131 kaybetmedi\u011fini, darp ve cebir bulgusuna rastlanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda kurum personelinin \u00d6.\u00c7.nin \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcne neden olacak darp, cebir ya da ba\u015fkaca eylemlerinin tespit edilemedi\u011fini, su\u00e7un ya da su\u00e7 unsurunun bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade etmi\u015ftir. Karara y\u00f6nelik itiraz Diyarbak\u0131r 2. Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fi taraf\u0131ndan 2\/1\/2021 tarihinde reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
12. Ba\u015fvurucular 9\/1\/2021 tarihinde nihai h\u00fckm\u00fc \u00f6\u011frenmelerinin ard\u0131ndan 26\/1\/2021 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
13. Ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME <\/p>\n
A. Ya\u015fam Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
14. Ba\u015fvurucular, \u00d6.\u00c7.nin vefat\u0131nda kurum personelinin ihmali oldu\u011funu, bu durumun tan\u0131k ifadeleri ile ortaya \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, \u00d6.\u00c7.nin m\u00fcdahale edilmeden bekletildi\u011fini, \u00d6.\u00c7.nin daha \u00f6nce darbedildi\u011fine dair beyanlar oldu\u011funu, hasta ve psikolojik rahats\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131 oldu\u011fu bilinmesine kar\u015f\u0131n gereken \u00f6nlemin al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, soru\u015fturma s\u00fcrecinde delillerin toplanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde; somut s\u00fcre\u00e7, ilgili mevzuat ve insan haklar\u0131 yarg\u0131s\u0131 i\u00e7tihad\u0131 detayl\u0131 olarak aktar\u0131larak adli makamlar\u0131n ula\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonu\u00e7tan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren bir durum olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131l\u0131rken bu hususlar\u0131n dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi bildirilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucular, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyan\u0131nda ba\u015fvuru formundaki iddialar\u0131n\u0131 yinelemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
15. Bir ki\u015finin ya\u015fam\u0131na y\u00f6nelik ger\u00e7ek ve yak\u0131n bir tehlike oldu\u011funun kamu makamlar\u0131nca bilindi\u011fi ya da bilinmesinin gerekti\u011fi durumlarda kamu makamlar\u0131n\u0131n makul \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcler \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde bu tehlikenin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesini \u00f6nleyebilecek \u015fekilde \u00f6nlem almas\u0131 gerekir. Ceza infaz kurumlar\u0131nda ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen \u00f6l\u00fcm olaylar\u0131 i\u00e7in de ge\u00e7erli olan bu y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn ortaya \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131 i\u00e7in ceza infaz kurumu yetkililerinin kendi kontrolleri alt\u0131ndaki bir ki\u015fiye y\u00f6nelik ger\u00e7ek bir risk oldu\u011funu bilip bilmediklerini ya da bilmeleri gerekip gerekmedi\u011fini tespit etmek, b\u00f6yle bir durum s\u00f6z konusu ise bu riski ortadan kald\u0131rmak i\u00e7in makul \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcler \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde ve sahip olduklar\u0131 yetkiler kapsam\u0131nda kendilerinden beklenen her \u015feyi yap\u0131p yapmad\u0131klar\u0131 incelenmelidir. Tutuklanan veya h\u00fcrriyeti ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 cezas\u0131n\u0131n infaz\u0131na ba\u015flanan ki\u015filerin daha \u00f6nce sahip olduklar\u0131 pek \u00e7ok \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fckten mahrum kalmalar\u0131n\u0131n ve g\u00fcnl\u00fck ya\u015famlar\u0131nda ciddi nitelikte bir de\u011fi\u015fim ya\u015famalar\u0131n\u0131n do\u011fal bir sonucu olarak psikolojileri, sa\u011fl\u0131k durumlar\u0131 bozulabilmektedir. Bu nedenle yasal ve ikincil d\u00fczenlemeler ceza infaz kurumu yetkililerine bu ki\u015filer hakk\u0131nda daha duyarl\u0131 ve dikkatli olma g\u00f6revi y\u00fcklemeli, tutuklu veya h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc ki\u015filerin hayatlar\u0131n\u0131n tehlikeye at\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6nleyici tedbirler al\u0131nmay\u0131 sa\u011flamal\u0131d\u0131r. Bu ama\u00e7la \u00f6ncelikle ceza infaz kurumunda kalan ki\u015filerin davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131 ve sa\u011fl\u0131k durumlar\u0131 takip edilmeli, gerekti\u011finde doktor muayenesine ba\u015fvurulmal\u0131, di\u011fer yandan bu konuda e\u011filimi oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lanlar a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan kendileri i\u00e7in en uygun yerlerde kalmalar\u0131 temin edilmelidir. Devletin ya\u015fam hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda sahip oldu\u011fu pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn usule ili\u015fkin boyutu \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturman\u0131n etkili kabul edilebilmesi i\u00e7in derh\u00e2l ba\u015flat\u0131lmas\u0131, sorumlular\u0131n belirlenmesini sa\u011flayabilecek b\u00fct\u00fcn delillerin soru\u015fturmada tespit edilmesi, olay\u0131 \u00e7evreleyen t\u00fcm ko\u015fullar\u0131n ayd\u0131nlat\u0131lmas\u0131, soru\u015fturman\u0131n nesnel ve tarafs\u0131z analizlere dayanmas\u0131, taraflar\u0131n soru\u015fturma s\u00fcrecine gerekti\u011fi \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde kat\u0131labilmesine olanak sa\u011flayacak \u015fekilde kamu denetimine a\u00e7\u0131k bi\u00e7imde \u00f6zenle y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesi ve su\u00e7 tespit edildi\u011fi takdirde eylemle orant\u0131l\u0131 bir ceza ile sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 gerekir. Bu, bir sonu\u00e7 y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc de\u011fil uygun ara\u00e7lar\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcd\u00fcr (T.A. [GK], B. No: 2017\/32972, 29\/9\/2021; Mehmet Kaya ve di\u011ferleri [2. B.], B. No: 2013\/6979, 20\/5\/2015).<\/p>\n
16. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
17. Ya\u015fam hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda devlet, \u00f6ncelikle ya\u015fam\u0131 tehlikeye girebilecek ki\u015filerin ya\u015fam\u0131n\u0131 korumak i\u00e7in yeterli yasal ve idari bir \u00e7er\u00e7eve olu\u015fturmal\u0131d\u0131r. Ayn\u0131 y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fck ceza infaz kurumlar\u0131nda bulunan ki\u015filerin ya\u015fam ve sa\u011fl\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131 i\u00e7in de ge\u00e7erlidir. Bu kapsamda ceza infaz kurumu yetkililerince yerine getirilecek kontrol ve denetim i\u015flemleri ile bu konuda al\u0131nacak di\u011fer tedbirlerin mevzuatta ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 olarak d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi daha \u00f6nce Anayasa Mahkemesince tespit edilmi\u015ftir (Nejla \u00d6zer ve M\u00fcslim \u00d6zer [2. B.], B. No: 2013\/3782, 21\/4\/2016, \u00a7\u00a7 74-89; Hilmi Moray [2. B.], B. No: 2013\/3053, 21\/4\/2016, \u00a7\u00a7 25-36).<\/p>\n
18. Ya\u015fam hakk\u0131na ili\u015fkin ihlal iddias\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesinde \u00f6ncelikle kurum yetkililerinin ya\u015fama y\u00f6nelik riski bilip bilmediklerinin veya bilmelerinin gerekip gerekmedi\u011finin, riski bildikleri veya bilmeleri gerekti\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde de riskin bertaraf edilmesi i\u00e7in \u00f6nleyici tedbirleri al\u0131p almad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n tespit edilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
19. Somut s\u00fcre\u00e7 bu ba\u011flamda ele al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda \u00d6.\u00c7.nin pskiolojik rahats\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131 yan\u0131nda \u00e7e\u015fitli sa\u011fl\u0131k problemleri (nefes darl\u0131\u011f\u0131, koah gibi ciddi solunum, dola\u015f\u0131m sistemi hastal\u0131klar\u0131) oldu\u011fu da anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Kurum b\u00fcnyesindeyken an\u0131lan rahats\u0131zl\u0131klardan \u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fc birden fazla kez olmak \u00fczere sa\u011fl\u0131k kurumuna sevk edilen, tedavisi d\u00fczenlenen ve yard\u0131mc\u0131 te\u00e7hizat (nebulizat\u00f6r) kullanmas\u0131 \u00f6nerilen \u00d6.\u00c7.nin sa\u011fl\u0131k durumundan sevki bizzat yapan kurum idaresinin haberdar oldu\u011fu a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. Bu ba\u011flamda \u00d6.\u00c7.nin gerek psikolojik gerekse fizyolojik olarak rahats\u0131z oldu\u011fu kamu makamlar\u0131n\u0131n bilgisi d\u00e2hilindedir.<\/p>\n
20. Olay g\u00fcn\u00fcne ili\u015fkin olarak yap\u0131lan tespitlerden (kamera kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesi, olay tutana\u011f\u0131, zaman \u00e7izelgesi vs.) ve bir\u00e7ok tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n ifadesinden \u00d6.\u00c7.nin olay g\u00fcn\u00fc sabah saat 09.00 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda A-9 ko\u011fu\u015funa getirildi\u011fi, getirildi\u011fi s\u0131rada ve devam\u0131nda hareketsiz oldu\u011fu, tepki vermedi\u011fi, konu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu h\u00e2lde yakla\u015f\u0131k iki saat kadar (saat 10.50’ye kadar) sandalyede hareketsiz tek ba\u015f\u0131na oturdu\u011fu, akabinde yata\u011fa al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve k\u0131sa s\u00fcre sonra nabz\u0131n\u0131n atmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n mahpuslarca anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Birbiriyle \u00f6rt\u00fc\u015fen tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131nda \u00d6.\u00c7. ko\u011fu\u015fa getirildi\u011finde hareketsiz ve tepkisiz oldu\u011funu fark eden mahpuslar\u0131n kurum personelini uyard\u0131\u011f\u0131 ancak \u00d6.\u00c7.nin ko\u011fu\u015fta b\u0131rak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tan\u0131k ifadelerinde belirtilmi\u015ftir. Kamera kay\u0131tlar\u0131na ili\u015fkin tutanak da \u00d6.\u00c7.nin sandalye \u00fczerinde uzun s\u00fcre hareketsiz, tepkisiz oturma h\u00e2line y\u00f6nelik beyan\u0131 destekler niteliktedir.<\/p>\n
21. Tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131 ve tutanaklarla desteklenen olu\u015f \u015fekliyle vaka ele al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ciddi fizyolojik ve psikolojik rahats\u0131zl\u0131klar\u0131 oldu\u011fu bilinen \u00d6.\u00c7.nin \u00e7evresindeki uyaranlara kendisini kapatacak \u015fekilde hareketsiz ve tepkisiz oldu\u011fu da g\u00f6r\u00fclmesine kar\u015f\u0131n uzun s\u00fcre (yakla\u015f\u0131k iki saat) herhangi bir yard\u0131m, t\u0131bbi \u00f6nlem al\u0131nmadan, durumu incelenmeden ko\u011fu\u015fta b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131 risk bilinmesine kar\u015f\u0131n riski bertaraf etmek i\u00e7in gereken etkin, pratik \u00f6nlemlerin al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a ortaya koymaktad\u0131r. Ciddi sa\u011fl\u0131k problemleri olan bir mahpusun hareketsiz ve tepki vermez h\u00e2lde oldu\u011fu bilinmesine kar\u015f\u0131n uzun s\u00fcre kontrols\u00fcz ve t\u0131bbi yard\u0131ms\u0131z b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n ceza infaz kurumlar\u0131nda devletin kontrol\u00fc alt\u0131ndaki ki\u015filere y\u00f6nelik daha titiz ve dikkatli olunmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektiren ya\u015fam\u0131 koruma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcyle ba\u011fda\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00f6ylenemez. Bu tespitler ve a\u00e7\u0131klamalar \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda kurum yetkililerinin \u00d6.\u00c7.nin ya\u015fam\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131 i\u00e7in gerekli olan makul ve etkili tedbirleri almakta yetersiz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
22. Bu a\u015famadan sonra ya\u015fam hakk\u0131na ili\u015fkin pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn usule ili\u015fkin y\u00f6n\u00fc olan etkili soru\u015fturma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc de\u011ferlendirilmelidir.<\/p>\n
23. Ki\u015filerin ya\u015fam\u0131 ile v\u00fccut b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u00fczerinde ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan risklerin en aza indirilmesi ve gerekli \u00f6nlemlerin al\u0131nmas\u0131 konusunda sorumlulu\u011fu bulunan ki\u015filerin tespit edilebilmesi ve tespit edilen sorumluluklar kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda devletin g\u00f6sterece\u011fi yarg\u0131sal tepki benzer olaylar\u0131n ya\u015fanmamas\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131maktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
24. \u00d6.\u00c7.nin vefat\u0131nda ya\u015fam\u0131 koruma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlali sonucunu do\u011furan olgu ve tespitler yukar\u0131da aktar\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n soru\u015fturma s\u00fcrecinde ya\u015fam\u0131 koruma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlal edilmesine neden olan hususlara (ciddi sa\u011fl\u0131k sorunlar\u0131 olan ki\u015finin tepkisiz ve hareketsiz olmas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131n iki saat boyunca kontrols\u00fcz, t\u0131bbi yard\u0131ms\u0131z b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131) ili\u015fkin bir de\u011ferlendirme yapmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Ayr\u0131ca ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 s\u00fcrecinde ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n yak\u0131n\u0131 \u00d6.\u00c7.yi olay g\u00fcn\u00fc ko\u011fu\u015flar aras\u0131nda nakleden kurum personelinin de ifadesinin al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Bu ba\u011flamda ciddi ve yak\u0131n riskin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131n etkin ve pratik \u00f6nlemlerin al\u0131nmas\u0131nda yetersiz kal\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 yani kamu g\u00f6revlilerinin eylemleri veya eylemsizlikleri ile ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak ya\u015fam\u0131 koruma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlal edildi\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan kamu g\u00f6revlileri hakk\u0131nda -ihlale neden olan hususlara dair herhangi bir de\u011ferlendirme, ara\u015ft\u0131rma yap\u0131lmadan- kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verilmesinin ve bu ba\u011flamda sorumlular\u0131n ortaya \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n engellenmesinin ya\u015fam hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda etkili ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesi y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ihlal sonucunu do\u011furdu\u011fu kanaatine ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
25. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle somut olayda ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n maddi (koruma) ve usul (etkili soru\u015fturma) y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
B. K\u00f6t\u00fc Muamele Yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
26. Ba\u015fvurucular, yak\u0131nlar\u0131 \u00d6.\u00c7.nin kurum i\u00e7inde zaman zaman k\u00f6t\u00fc muameleye maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bunun da tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131 ile tevsik edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrmektedir. Anayasa Mahkemesi genel olarak \u00f6l\u00fcm olay\u0131yla yak\u0131ndan ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olmas\u0131 (\u00f6rne\u011fin \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele sonucu meydana gelmesi) ko\u015fuluyla ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n \u00f6len yak\u0131nlar\u0131 ad\u0131na k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde ba\u015fvuru yapabilmelerine izin vermektedir (Muazzez Babak ve Naif Babak [1. B.], B. No: 2017\/35564, 9\/6\/2021, \u00a7 109; Batuhan G\u00f6k\u00e7e ve di\u011ferleri [1. B.], B. No: 2018\/36427, 6\/10\/2021, \u00a7 90; ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 bilgi i\u00e7in ayr\u0131ca bkz. Batuhan G\u00f6k\u00e7e ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7\u00a7 86-89). Somut ba\u015fvuruda \u00f6l\u00fcm olay\u0131 fiziksel m\u00fcdahale (darp, cebir, \u015fiddet) sonucu meydana gelmemi\u015f olup soru\u015fturma s\u00fcrecinde elde edilen veriler de b\u00f6yle bir ba\u011flant\u0131ya i\u015faret etmedi\u011finden ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ma\u011fdur s\u0131fat\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
27. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurunun bu k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n ki\u015fi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yetkisizlik nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M<\/p>\n
28. Ba\u015fvurucular, ihlalin tespiti ile birlikte yeniden soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmas\u0131 ve her biri i\u00e7in 50.000 TL manevi tazminata h\u00fckmedilmesi talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
29. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen anayasal hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar ve zorunluluk bulunmaktad\u0131r. Anayasa’n\u0131n 148. ve 153. maddeleri ile 30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 50. ve 66. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca ihlal karar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi yarg\u0131 mercilerince yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden soru\u015fturma i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flat\u0131p Anayasa Mahkemesinin ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere ve gerek\u00e7elere uygun bi\u00e7imde y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclecek soru\u015fturma sonunda hak ihlalinin nedenlerini gidererek yeni bir karar vermektir (yeniden soru\u015fturma konusunda bkz. Mehmet Do\u011fan [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2) [1. B.], B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n
30. Ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinin b\u00fct\u00fcn sonu\u00e7lar\u0131yla ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in manevi zararlar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ba\u015fvuruculara m\u00fc\u015ftereken net 300.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00f6denmesine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. 1. Ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
2. K\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n ki\u015fi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yetkisizlik nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. Anayasa’n\u0131n 17. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n maddi ve usul boyutu y\u00f6n\u00fcnden \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
C. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere Diyarbak\u0131r Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Sor. No: 2019\/16660, K.2020\/24831) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. Ba\u015fvuruculara net 300.000 TL manevi tazminat\u0131n M\u00dc\u015eTEREKEN \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. 487,60 TL har\u00e7 ve 30.000 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinden olu\u015fan toplam 30.487,60 TL yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvuruculara M\u00dc\u015eTEREKEN \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
F. \u00d6demelerin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
G. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 30\/4\/2025 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 30\/4\/2025 tarihli ve 2021\/6156 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR ABDULKAD\u0130R \u00c7EV\u0130K VE D\u0130\u011eERLER\u0130 BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/6156) Karar Tarihi: 30\/4\/2025 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR Metin KIRATLI Raport\u00f6r : Volkan \u00c7AKMAK Ba\u015fvurucular : 1. Abdulkadir \u00c7EV\u0130K 2. Ali \u00c7EV\u0130K 3. Aynur G\u00dcLM\u00dc\u015e 4. G\u00fcll\u00fc \u00c7EV\u0130K 5. Hasibe DEM\u0130RCAN 6. \u0130pek \u00c7EV\u0130K 7. Mehmet \u00c7EV\u0130K 8. Mehmet Selim \u00c7EV\u0130K 9. Mehmet \u015eah \u00c7EV\u0130K 10. Remziye \u00c7EV\u0130K 11. Sevdet YILMAZ Vekili : Av. Muhammet Polat \u0130\u00c7TEN I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, ceza infaz kurumunda meydana gelen \u00f6l\u00fcm nedeniyle ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n yak\u0131n\u0131 (G\u00fcll\u00fc \u00c7evik’in e\u015fi di\u011fer ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n ise babas\u0131) \u00d6.\u00c7. Diyarbak\u0131r 2 No.lu T Tipi Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumunda silahla ya\u011fma ve ki\u015fiyi h\u00fcrriyetinden yoksun k\u0131lma su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 hapis cezas\u0131 nedeniyle h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc olarak bulunmaktayken 20\/3\/2019 tarihinde saat 11.00 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda rahats\u0131zlanm\u0131\u015f ve kald\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 sa\u011fl\u0131k kurumunda vefat etmi\u015ftir. 3. \u00d6.\u00c7.nin daha \u00f6nce d\u00fczenli takibinin yap\u0131lmas\u0131 kayd\u0131yla ceza tehirine gerek olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde 29\/6\/2018 tarihli ve ceza infaz kurumunda tek ba\u015f\u0131na hayat\u0131n\u0131 idame ettirebilece\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde d\u00fczenlenen 4\/2\/2019 tarihli t\u0131bbi raporlar temelinde cezas\u0131n\u0131n infaz\u0131na ara verilmesi talepleri 19\/7\/2018 ve 11\/3\/2019 tarihlerinde reddedilmi\u015ftir. \u00d6.\u00c7. 2018 ve 2019 y\u0131llar\u0131nda kurum ara\u00e7 ve gere\u00e7lerine zarar vermesi nedeniyle …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-141567","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n