T.C.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay<\/p>\n
Ceza Genel Kurulu<\/p>\n
2013\/735 E., 2016\/55 K.<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
Mahkemesi : … Asliye Ceza<\/p>\n
Doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7undan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n TCK’nun 157\/1, 62, 53\/1, 50 ve 52\/2-4 maddeleri gere\u011fince 2 y\u0131l 6 ay hapis ve 2000 Lira adli para cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ve hak yoksunlu\u011funa ili\u015fkin, … Asliye Ceza Mahkemesince verilen … g\u00fcn ve … say\u0131l\u0131 h\u00fckm\u00fcn, san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine dosyay\u0131 inceleyen Yarg\u0131tay … Ceza Dairesince … g\u00fcn ve … say\u0131 ile onanmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ise … g\u00fcn ve … say\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n
“…Kat\u0131lanlar\u0131n zarar\u0131n\u0131 giderece\u011fini beyan eden san\u0131\u011fa, kat\u0131lan taraf bu teklifi kabul etmese bile tevdi mahalli (\u00f6deme yeri) tayin edilerek, kalan zarar\u0131 \u00f6demesi i\u00e7in makul bir s\u00fcre tan\u0131nmas\u0131, neticesine g\u00f6re san\u0131\u011f\u0131n etkin pi\u015fmanl\u0131k h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinden yararlan\u0131p yararlanmayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekirken, mahkemece bu bu yola tevess\u00fcl edilmeden karar verilerek san\u0131\u011f\u0131n etkin pi\u015fmanl\u0131k h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinden istifade edebilme imkan\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 bulundu\u011fu,…” d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesiyle itiraz kanun yoluna m\u00fcracaat ederek, \u00d6zel Dairenin onama ilam\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ve yerel mahkeme h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn bozulmas\u0131na karar verilmesi isteminde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
CMK’nun 308\/1. maddesi uyar\u0131nca inceleme yapan \u00d6zel Dairece, … g\u00fcn ve …-… say\u0131 ile, itiraz\u0131n yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmedi\u011finden bahisle Yarg\u0131tay Birinci Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6nderilen dosya, Ceza Genel Kurulunca de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015f ve a\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle karara ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
T\u00dcRK M\u0130LLET\u0130 ADINA<\/p>\n
CEZA GENEL KURULU KARARI<\/p>\n
\u00d6zel Daireyle Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 aras\u0131nda olu\u015fan ve \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmlenmesi gereken uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k; doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7undan ma\u011fdurlar\u0131n u\u011frad\u0131klar\u0131 zarar\u0131 k\u0131smen gideren ve geri kalan\u0131n\u0131 da kar\u015f\u0131lamak isteyen san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda TCK’nun 168. maddesinin uygulan\u0131p uygulanmayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan mahkemece bir \u00f6deme noktas\u0131 belirlenerek zarar\u0131 gidermek \u00fczere imkan tan\u0131nmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla \u00d6zel Dairece h\u00fckm\u00fcn bozulmas\u0131 gerekip gerekmedi\u011fi noktas\u0131nda toplanmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
\u0130ncelenen dosya kapsam\u0131ndan;<\/p>\n
Market i\u015fleten kat\u0131lan …\u2019ye kendisini mahalleye yeni ta\u015f\u0131nan \u00fcniversite hocas\u0131 … olarak tan\u0131tan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n 65 Liral\u0131k veresiye g\u0131da al\u0131\u015fveri\u015fi yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131, 2 g\u00fcn sonra al\u0131\u015fveri\u015f yapmak \u00fczere tekrar markete gitti\u011finde san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda ara\u015ft\u0131rma yapan …\u2019nin \u201csen burada oturmuyormu\u015fsun\u201d diyerek kimlik istedi\u011fi, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n borcunun 55 Liral\u0131k k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131 verdi\u011fi, …’nin \u00e7\u0131\u011fl\u0131k atarak “polis \u00e7a\u011f\u0131r\u0131n” demesi \u00fczerine ka\u00e7maya \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, ancak yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131,
\nKat\u0131lan …, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n yakalanmadan \u00f6nce 65 Lira civar\u0131ndaki borcundan dolay\u0131 50 liray\u0131 o\u011flu …\u2019a verdi\u011fini, halen kendisinden 15-16 Lira civar\u0131nda alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011funu, bu miktar\u0131 \u00f6demedi\u011fini, k\u0131smi iadeye r\u0131za g\u00f6stermedi\u011fini, san\u0131ktan \u015fikayet\u00e7i oldu\u011funu beyan etti\u011fi,<\/p>\n
San\u0131k, al\u0131\u015fveri\u015f sonras\u0131 deftere borcu 65 Lira yazd\u0131r\u0131p herhangi bir para \u00f6demedi\u011fini, ikinci defa ekmek almaya gitti\u011finde kat\u0131lan\u0131n kimlik istendi\u011fini, hayali olarak verdi\u011fi isim ortaya \u00e7\u0131kacak diye d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcp cebinde bulunan 55 Liray\u0131 verdi\u011fini, kat\u0131lanlara olan borcunu \u00f6demek istedi\u011fini, yanlar\u0131na gidemedi\u011fi i\u00e7in \u00f6deyemedi\u011fini, yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan pi\u015fman oldu\u011funu, kabul ederlerse borcunu \u00f6demek istedi\u011fini savundu\u011fu,<\/p>\n
Anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanununun, uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k konusuyla ilgili olan “etkin pi\u015fmanl\u0131k” ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 168. maddesi;<\/p>\n
“1) H\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k, mala zarar verme, g\u00fcveni k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanma, doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k ve kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131ks\u0131z yararlanma su\u00e7lar\u0131 tamamland\u0131ktan sonra ve fakat bu nedenle hakk\u0131nda kovu\u015fturma ba\u015flamadan \u00f6nce failin, azmettirenin veya yard\u0131m edenin bizzat pi\u015fmanl\u0131k g\u00f6stererek ma\u011fdurun u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131 zarar\u0131 aynen geri verme veya tazmin suretiyle tamamen gidermesi halinde; cezas\u0131 \u00fc\u00e7te birden \u00fc\u00e7te ikiye kadar indirilir. Ya\u011fma su\u00e7unda ise, cezada alt\u0131da birden \u00fc\u00e7te bire kadar indirim yap\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n
2) K\u0131smen geri verme veya tazmin halinde etkin pi\u015fmanl\u0131k h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanabilmesi i\u00e7in, ma\u011fdurun r\u0131zas\u0131 aran\u0131r” \u015feklinde d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f iken, 08.07.2005 tarihli Resmi Gazetede yay\u0131nlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 5377 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 20. maddesiyle;<\/p>\n
“1) H\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k, mala zarar verme, g\u00fcveni k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanma, doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k, hileli ifl\u00e2s, taksirli ifl\u00e2s ve kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131ks\u0131z yararlanma su\u00e7lar\u0131 tamamland\u0131ktan sonra ve fakat bu nedenle hakk\u0131nda kovu\u015fturma ba\u015flamadan \u00f6nce failin, azmettirenin veya yard\u0131m edenin bizzat pi\u015fmanl\u0131k g\u00f6stererek ma\u011fdurun u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131 zarar\u0131 aynen geri verme veya tazmin suretiyle tamamen gidermesi halinde, verilecek cezan\u0131n \u00fc\u00e7te ikisine kadar\u0131 indirilir.<\/p>\n
2) Etkin pi\u015fmanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n kovu\u015fturma ba\u015flad\u0131ktan sonra ve fakat h\u00fck\u00fcm verilmezden \u00f6nce g\u00f6sterilmesi halinde, verilecek cezan\u0131n yar\u0131s\u0131na kadar\u0131 indirilir.<\/p>\n
3) Ya\u011fma su\u00e7undan dolay\u0131 etkin pi\u015fmanl\u0131k g\u00f6steren ki\u015fiye verilecek cezan\u0131n, birinci f\u0131kraya giren hallerde yar\u0131s\u0131na, ikinci f\u0131kraya giren hallerde \u00fc\u00e7te birine kadar\u0131 indirilir.<\/p>\n
4) K\u0131smen geri verme veya tazmin halinde etkin pi\u015fmanl\u0131k h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanabilmesi i\u00e7in, ayr\u0131ca ma\u011fdurun r\u0131zas\u0131 aran\u0131r” bi\u00e7iminde yeniden h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Ceza Genel Kurulunun … g\u00fcn ve …-… say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi; TCK’nun 168. maddesinde yer alan “etkin pi\u015fmanl\u0131k” h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanabilmesi i\u00e7in, maddede s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 \u015fekilde say\u0131lan su\u00e7lar\u0131n i\u015flenmesi halinde, failin bizzat pi\u015fmanl\u0131k g\u00f6stererek ma\u011fdurun u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131 zarar\u0131 aynen iade veya tazmin suretiyle tamamen gidermesi gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n
An\u0131lan madde, bu d\u00fczenleni\u015f \u015fekliyle 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’nun 523. maddesinden olduk\u00e7a farkl\u0131d\u0131r. … g\u00fcn ve 10-16 say\u0131l\u0131 Yarg\u0131tay \u0130\u00e7tihad\u0131 Birle\u015ftirme Karar\u0131 ile Ceza Genel Kurulunun 11.11.1997 g\u00fcn ve 248-288 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ba\u015fta olmak \u00fczere bir\u00e7ok karar\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a vurguland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere, 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’nun 523. maddesi “iade ve tazmin” esas\u0131na dayal\u0131d\u0131r. 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanununun 168. maddesi ise, tazminden \u00e7ok “pi\u015fmanl\u0131k” esas\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6n plana \u00e7\u0131karmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
\u00d6\u011fretide de; 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’nun 168. maddesinin, 765 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanununun 523. maddesinden farkl\u0131 olarak “tazminden \u00e7ok pi\u015fmanl\u0131k” esas\u0131na dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilmi\u015ftir. (Durmu\u015f Tezcan-Mustafa Ruhan Erdem-Murat \u00d6nok, Teorik Ve Pratik Ceza \u00d6zel Hukuku, 11. Bask\u0131, Se\u00e7kin Yay\u0131nevi, Ankara 2014, s. 696-702; Veli \u00d6zer \u00d6zbek-M. Nihat Kambur – Koray Do\u011fan-P\u0131nar Bacaks\u0131z-\u0130lker Tepe, T\u00fcrk Ceza Hukuku \u00d6zel H\u00fck\u00fcmler 8. Bask\u0131, Se\u00e7kin Yay\u0131nevi, Ankara 2015, s. 615-618; Sedat Bak\u0131c\u0131, Ceza Hukuku \u00d6zel H\u00fck\u00fcmleri, Adalet Yay\u0131nevi, Ankara 2008, s. 934; Erdal Noyan, H\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k Su\u00e7lar\u0131, Adalet Yay\u0131nevi, Ankara 2007 s. 396; Ali Parlar-Muzaffer Hatipo\u011flu, T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu Yorumu, Ankara 2007, c. 2, s. 1318; H\u00fcseyin Eker, H\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k Su\u00e7lar\u0131, 2. Bask\u0131, Adalet Yay\u0131nevi, Ankara 2014, s.756)<\/p>\n
TCK’nun 168. maddesinin d\u00fczenlenmesi s\u0131ras\u0131nda maddeye; “failin, azmettirenin veya yard\u0131m edenin bizzat pi\u015fmanl\u0131k g\u00f6stererek ma\u011fdurun u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131 zarar\u0131 aynen geri verme veya tazmin suretiyle tamamen gidermesi” ifadesi eklenmek suretiyle, muhtemel teredd\u00fctlerin \u00f6n\u00fcne ge\u00e7ilmek istenmi\u015ftir. Zira madde metninde ge\u00e7en “bizzat pi\u015fmanl\u0131k g\u00f6stererek” ibaresi, d\u00fczenlemenin “tek ba\u015f\u0131na iade ve tazmine” de\u011fil, “pi\u015fmanl\u0131k sonucu olan iade ve tazmine” \u00f6nem atfetti\u011finin a\u00e7\u0131k g\u00f6stergesidir. Nitekim T\u00fcrkiye B\u00fcy\u00fck Millet Meclisi Komisyonunda maddeyle ilgili g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeler s\u0131ras\u0131nda da konu g\u00fcndeme gelmi\u015f ve oturum ba\u015fkan\u0131n\u0131n; “\u00f6nemli olan zarar\u0131n giderilmesi de\u011fil mi” \u015feklindeki sorusuna, kanunun haz\u0131rlanmas\u0131nda g\u00f6revli olan \u0130zzet \u00d6zgen\u00e7; “bu maddenin korudu\u011fu espri, ma\u011fdurun ma\u011fduriyetini sadece gidermek de\u011fil, ki\u015finin pi\u015fmanl\u0131k duymas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamak” \u015feklinde cevap vermi\u015ftir. (Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Yay\u0131n \u0130\u015fleri Dairesi Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131, Tutanaklarla T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu, Ankara 2005, s. 616)<\/p>\n
Bu kanuni d\u00fczenlemeler ve a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131n sonucu olarak; iade ve tazminin cebri icra yoluyla ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmesi, zarar\u0131n failin r\u0131zas\u0131 hilaf\u0131na ya da ondan habersiz olarak \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015filer taraf\u0131ndan giderilmesi, e\u015fyan\u0131n failin yakalanmamak i\u00e7in ka\u00e7arken atmas\u0131 sonucu veya ka\u00e7arken yakalanan failin \u00fczerinde ele ge\u00e7irilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 gibi hallerde failin ger\u00e7ek anlamdaki pi\u015fmanl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan s\u00f6z edilemeyece\u011finden, maddenin uygulanma \u015fartlar\u0131 olu\u015fmayacakt\u0131r. Buna kar\u015f\u0131n, etkin pi\u015fmanl\u0131k h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanabilmesi i\u00e7in ma\u011fdurun u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131 zarar\u0131n aynen geri verme ya da tazmin suretiyle tamamen giderilmesi \u015fart\u0131 yerine getirilirken, pi\u015fmanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n mutlaka s\u00f6zle ifade edilmesi zorunlulu\u011fu bulunmay\u0131p, olay\u0131n \u00f6zelliklerine g\u00f6re davran\u0131\u015f yolu ile de g\u00f6sterilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olabilecektir.<\/p>\n
\u00d6te yandan kanun koyucu TCK’nun 168\/4 maddesi uyar\u0131nca k\u0131smen geri verme veya tazmin halinde etkin pi\u015fmanl\u0131k h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanabilmesi i\u00e7in, ayr\u0131ca ma\u011fdurun r\u0131zas\u0131n\u0131 aram\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan zarar\u0131n tamam\u0131n\u0131n aynen geri verme veya tazmin suretiyle giderilmesi veya giderilmek istenmesi halinde etkin pi\u015fmanl\u0131k h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanabilmesi i\u00e7in ma\u011fdurun r\u0131zas\u0131 aranmamaktad\u0131r. Di\u011fer bir ifadeyle ma\u011furun iade veya tazmini kabul etmemesi san\u0131k aleyhine yorumlanmamal\u0131, mahkemece bir \u00f6deme noktas\u0131 belirlenmek suretiyle zarar\u0131 gidermek isteyen san\u0131\u011fa zarar\u0131 giderme imkan\u0131 sunulmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Somut olay bu a\u00e7\u0131klamalar \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde;<\/p>\n
Market i\u015fleten kat\u0131lan …\u2019ye kendisini mahalleye yeni ta\u015f\u0131nan \u00fcniversite hocas\u0131 … olarak tan\u0131tan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n 65 Liral\u0131k veresiye g\u0131da al\u0131\u015fveri\u015fi yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131, iki g\u00fcn sonra al\u0131\u015fveri\u015f yapmak \u00fczere tekrar markete gitti\u011finde san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda ara\u015ft\u0131rma yapan kat\u0131lan …\u2019nin \u201csen burada oturmuyormu\u015fsun\u201d diyerek kimlik istedi\u011fi, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n borcunun 55 Liral\u0131k k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131 verdi\u011fi, …’nin \u00e7\u0131\u011fl\u0131k atarak “polis \u00e7a\u011f\u0131r\u0131n” demesi \u00fczerine ka\u00e7maya \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, ancak yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131, a\u015famalarda pi\u015fman oldu\u011funu ve geri kalan zarar\u0131 gidermek istedi\u011fini beyan etti\u011fi olayda; yerel mahkemece zarar\u0131n miktar\u0131n\u0131n ve bu zarar\u0131n hangi a\u015famada kar\u015f\u0131lanmak istendi\u011finin tespit edilerek, bir \u00f6deme noktas\u0131 tayin edilip, san\u0131\u011fa zarar\u0131 giderme imkan\u0131 sunularak sonucuna g\u00f6re san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda TCK’nun 168. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen etkin pi\u015fmanl\u0131k h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanma \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131n bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesi ve san\u0131\u011f\u0131n hukuki durumunun buna g\u00f6re tayin edilmesi gerekmektedir. .<\/p>\n
Bu itibarla, Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fcne, \u00d6zel Daire onama karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, usul ve kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 olan mahalli mahkeme h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn bozulmas\u0131na karar verilmelidir.<\/p>\n
\u00c7o\u011funluk g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kat\u0131lmayan be\u015f Genel Kurul \u00dcyesi; itiraz\u0131n reddi gerekti\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesiyle kar\u015f\u0131oy kullanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
SONU\u00c7:<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle;<\/p>\n
1- Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz\u0131n\u0131n KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n
2- Yarg\u0131tay … Ceza Dairesinin … tarih ve … say\u0131l\u0131 onama karar\u0131n\u0131n KALDIRILMASINA,<\/p>\n
3- Usul ve kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 olan … Asliye Ceza Mahkemesinin … g\u00fcn ve … say\u0131l\u0131 mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn BOZULMASINA,<\/p>\n
4- Dosyan\u0131n mahalline g\u00f6nderilmek \u00fczere Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na TEVD\u0130\u0130NE, 09.02.2016 tarihinde yap\u0131lan m\u00fczakerede oy\u00e7oklu\u011fuyla karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bYarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulu’nun 09.02.2016 tarihli, 2013\/735 E., 2016\/55 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T.C. Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulu 2013\/735 E., 2016\/55 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” Mahkemesi : … Asliye Ceza Doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7undan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n TCK’nun 157\/1, 62, 53\/1, 50 ve 52\/2-4 maddeleri gere\u011fince 2 y\u0131l 6 ay hapis ve 2000 Lira adli para cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ve hak yoksunlu\u011funa ili\u015fkin, … Asliye Ceza Mahkemesince verilen … g\u00fcn ve … say\u0131l\u0131 h\u00fckm\u00fcn, san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine dosyay\u0131 inceleyen Yarg\u0131tay … Ceza Dairesince … g\u00fcn ve … say\u0131 ile onanmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir. Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ise … g\u00fcn ve … say\u0131 ile; “…Kat\u0131lanlar\u0131n zarar\u0131n\u0131 giderece\u011fini beyan eden san\u0131\u011fa, kat\u0131lan taraf bu teklifi kabul etmese bile tevdi mahalli (\u00f6deme yeri) tayin edilerek, kalan zarar\u0131 \u00f6demesi i\u00e7in makul bir s\u00fcre tan\u0131nmas\u0131, neticesine g\u00f6re san\u0131\u011f\u0131n etkin pi\u015fmanl\u0131k h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinden yararlan\u0131p yararlanmayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekirken, mahkemece bu bu yola tevess\u00fcl edilmeden karar verilerek san\u0131\u011f\u0131n etkin pi\u015fmanl\u0131k h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinden istifade edebilme imkan\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 bulundu\u011fu,…” d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesiyle itiraz kanun yoluna m\u00fcracaat ederek, \u00d6zel Dairenin onama ilam\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ve yerel mahkeme h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn bozulmas\u0131na karar verilmesi isteminde bulunmu\u015ftur. CMK’nun 308\/1. maddesi uyar\u0131nca inceleme yapan \u00d6zel Dairece, … g\u00fcn ve …-… say\u0131 ile, itiraz\u0131n yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmedi\u011finden bahisle Yarg\u0131tay Birinci Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6nderilen dosya, Ceza Genel Kurulunca de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015f ve a\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle karara ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. T\u00dcRK M\u0130LLET\u0130 ADINA …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-133753","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n