{"id":131259,"date":"2025-06-30T10:35:00","date_gmt":"2025-06-30T07:35:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uncategorized-tr\/elbirligi-mulkiyetinin-payli-mulkiyete-donusturulmesi-davalarina-iliskin-yargitay-kararlari\/"},"modified":"2025-06-30T10:35:00","modified_gmt":"2025-06-30T07:35:00","slug":"elbirligi-mulkiyetinin-payli-mulkiyete-donusturulmesi-davalarina-iliskin-yargitay-kararlari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/elbirligi-mulkiyetinin-payli-mulkiyete-donusturulmesi-davalarina-iliskin-yargitay-kararlari\/","title":{"rendered":"ELB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130 M\u00dcLK\u0130YET\u0130N\u0130N PAYLI M\u00dcLK\u0130YETE D\u00d6N\u00dc\u015eT\u00dcR\u00dcLMES\u0130 DAVALARINA \u0130L\u0130\u015eK\u0130N YARGITAY KARARLARI"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>T.C.<\/p>\n<p>Yarg\u0131tay<\/p>\n<p>7. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n<p>2022\/6973 E., 2024\/160 K.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>MAHKEMES\u0130 : Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi<br \/>\nSAYISI : 2008\/13 E., 2008\/130 K.<br \/>\nKARAR : Davan\u0131n reddi<\/p>\n<p>Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki sat\u0131\u015f vaadi s\u00f6zle\u015fmesine dayal\u0131 tapu iptali ve tescil istemine ili\u015fkin yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonucunda; davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Mahkeme karar\u0131 davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmekle; kesinlik, s\u00fcre, temyiz \u015fart\u0131 ve di\u011fer usul eksiklikleri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yap\u0131lan \u00f6n inceleme sonucunda, temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin kabul\u00fcne karar verildikten ve Tetkik H\u00e2kimi taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan rapor dinlendikten sonra dosyadaki belgeler incelenip gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p>I. DAVA<br \/>\nDavac\u0131 dava dilek\u00e7esinde, daval\u0131n\u0131n, murisi &#8230; &#8216;den intikal eden dava konusu 67 ada 8 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaz \u00fczerindeki t\u00fcm hak ve hissesini noterde d\u00fczenlenen 02.09.2002 tarihli ta\u015f\u0131nmaz sat\u0131\u015f vaadi s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi ile &#8230;&#8217;e satmay\u0131 vaad etti\u011fini, kendisinin de Tarsus 1. Noterli\u011finin 04.10.2007 tarih ve 6699 yevmiye No.lu sat\u0131\u015f vaadi devir temlik s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi ile sat\u0131\u015f\u0131 vaad edilen hisseyi Galip \u015eahin\u2019den temlik ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek, dava konusu ta\u015f\u0131nmazda daval\u0131ya d\u00fc\u015fecek hissenin kendi ad\u0131na tesciline karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>II. CEVAP<br \/>\nDaval\u0131 24.03.2008 tarihli celsedeki beyan\u0131nda, kendi ad\u0131na kay\u0131tl\u0131 olan hissenin davac\u0131 ad\u0131na devrini kabul etti\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>III. MAHKEME KARARI<br \/>\nMahkemenin yukar\u0131da tarih ve say\u0131s\u0131 belirtilen karar\u0131 ile, kay\u0131t sahibinin miras\u00e7\u0131s\u0131 oldu\u011fu iddia edilen &#8230;\u2019den ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131 sat\u0131\u015f vaadi s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi ile alan ve bir s\u00fcre sonra davac\u0131ya yine sat\u0131\u015f vaadi s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi ile satan \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015finin i\u015fleminin ifa olana\u011f\u0131 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, sat\u0131\u015f silsilesi takip edildi\u011finde sat\u0131\u015f vaadine hak ve yetkisi olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lamayan daval\u0131 ve daval\u0131dan alarak davac\u0131ya sat\u0131\u015f vaadinde bulunan &#8230; taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan sat\u0131\u015f vaadi s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerinin ge\u00e7erlili\u011finin de anla\u015f\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131, davan\u0131n yasal \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilerek reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>IV. TEMY\u0130Z<br \/>\nA. Temyiz Yoluna Ba\u015fvuranlar<br \/>\nMahkemenin yukar\u0131da belirtilen karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde davac\u0131 temyiz isteminde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p>B. Temyiz Sebepleri<br \/>\nDavac\u0131 temyizinde, mahkemece eksik ara\u015ft\u0131rma ve inceleme yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, i\u015ftirak halinde m\u00fclkiyetin m\u00fc\u015fterek m\u00fclkiyete d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ve daval\u0131 pay\u0131n\u0131n intikalinin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, mahkemenin s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin ifa edilemece\u011fine ili\u015fkin gerek\u00e7esinin yerinde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, daval\u0131n\u0131n kabul beyan\u0131 da bulundu\u011funa g\u00f6re davan\u0131n kabul edilmesi gerekti\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrerek, karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131n\u0131 istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>C. Gerek\u00e7e<br \/>\n1. Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k ve Hukuki Nitelendirme<br \/>\nUyu\u015fmazl\u0131k, sat\u0131\u015f vaadi s\u00f6zle\u015fmesine dayal\u0131 tapu iptali ve tescil istemine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p>2. \u0130lgili Hukuk<br \/>\n1.6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun (6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun) 369 uncu maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 ile 370 ve 371 inci maddeleri,<\/p>\n<p>2. Sat\u0131\u015f vaadi s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinden kaynaklanan davalar\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verebilmek i\u00e7in s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin ifa olana\u011f\u0131 bulunmal\u0131d\u0131r. Elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetine (TMK md.701) konu bir ta\u015f\u0131nmazda elbirli\u011fi (i\u015ftirak halinde) ortaklar\u0131ndan birinin, ortakl\u0131k d\u0131\u015f\u0131 bir ki\u015fiye sat\u0131m vaadinde bulunmas\u0131 halinde, s\u00f6zle\u015fme bir taahh\u00fct muamelesi olarak ge\u00e7erli olmakla birlikte elbirli\u011fi ortakl\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcl\u00fcnceye kadar s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin ifa olana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan s\u00f6z edilemez.<\/p>\n<p>4721 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun \u201cElbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclmesi\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 644 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddesinin ilk ve ikinci f\u0131kralar\u0131nda yer alan \u201cBir miras\u00e7\u0131, terekeye dahil mallar\u0131n tamam\u0131 veya bir k\u0131sm\u0131 \u00fczerindeki elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclmesi isteminde bulundu\u011fu takdirde sulh hakimi, di\u011fer miras\u00e7\u0131lara \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131da bulunarak belirleyece\u011fi s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde varsa itirazlar\u0131n\u0131 bildirmeye davet eder. Elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin devam\u0131n\u0131 hakl\u0131 k\u0131lacak bir itiraz ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclmedi\u011fi veya miras\u00e7\u0131lardan biri belirlenen s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde payla\u015fma davas\u0131 a\u00e7mad\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde istem konusu mal \u00fczerindeki elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclmesine karar verilir\u201d h\u00fckm\u00fc uyar\u0131nca elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclmesi ya t\u00fcm miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131n kat\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 bir s\u00f6zle\u015fme ile tapu sicil m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u00f6n\u00fcnde veya bir miras\u00e7\u0131n\u0131n di\u011fer miras\u00e7\u0131lar aleyhine a\u00e7aca\u011f\u0131 dava sonucu ve herhalde kanundaki \u015fartlar\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi halinde h\u00e2kim h\u00fckm\u00fc ile m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p>Elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyeti payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclmedi\u011fi s\u00fcrece payda\u015flardan bir veya birka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131n yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 sat\u0131\u015f vaadi s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin bu a\u015famada ifa olana\u011f\u0131 yoktur. Bu kapsamda miras\u00e7\u0131 olmayan davac\u0131n\u0131n bu d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcrmeyi talep etme hakk\u0131 da yoktur.<\/p>\n<p>3. De\u011ferlendirme<br \/>\n1. Temyiz olunan nihai kararlar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 371 inci maddesinde yer alan sebeplerden birinin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 h\u00e2linde m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p>2. Davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihte ta\u015f\u0131nmaz sat\u0131\u015f vaadi s\u00f6zle\u015fmesine konu edilen pay tapuda elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyeti \u015feklinde kay\u0131tl\u0131 oldu\u011fundan s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin ifa olana\u011f\u0131 yok ise de, ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n tapu kayd\u0131n\u0131n UYAP sisteminden yap\u0131lan incelemesinde, payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fc anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. H\u00fck\u00fcm hen\u00fcz kesinle\u015fmeden s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin ifa olana\u011f\u0131 do\u011fdu\u011fundan, mahkemece ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n g\u00fcncel tapu kay\u0131tlar\u0131 getirtilerek ta\u015f\u0131nmaz sat\u0131\u015f vaadi s\u00f6zle\u015fmesine dayal\u0131 tescil talebi hakk\u0131nda bir karar verilmek \u00fczere h\u00fckm\u00fcn bozulmas\u0131 gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>VI. KARAR<\/p>\n<p>A\u00e7\u0131klanan sebeplerle;<\/p>\n<p>Temyiz olunan Mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n BOZULMASINA,<\/p>\n<p>Pe\u015fin al\u0131nan temyiz karar harc\u0131n\u0131n istek h\u00e2linde ilgiliye iadesine,<\/p>\n<p>Dosyan\u0131n karar\u0131 veren Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmesine,<\/p>\n<p>Karar\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren 15 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde karar d\u00fczeltme yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere,<\/p>\n<p>15.01.2024 tarihinde oy birli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>T.C.<\/p>\n<p>Yarg\u0131tay<\/p>\n<p>7. Hukuk Dairesi <\/p>\n<p>2021\/639 E. , 2021\/2981 K.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>MAHKEMES\u0130 :Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesi<\/p>\n<p>Davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan, daval\u0131lar aleyhine 11\/02\/2015 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde verilen dilek\u00e7e ile elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete \u00e7evrilmesi istenmesi \u00fczerine yap\u0131lan duru\u015fma sonunda; davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne dair verilen 12\/05\/2016 g\u00fcnl\u00fc h\u00fckm\u00fcn Yarg\u0131tayca incelenmesi davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenilmekle s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin kabul\u00fcne karar verildikten sonra dosya ve i\u00e7erisindeki b\u00fct\u00fcn evrak incelenerek gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p>K A R A R<\/p>\n<p>Dava, elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete \u00e7evrilmesi istemine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p>Davac\u0131 vekili, daval\u0131lar\u0131n ortak murisi Ali Bulu\u015f ad\u0131na kay\u0131tl\u0131 30 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmazla ilgili olarak m\u00fcvekkili ile daval\u0131lardan &#8230;, &#8230; ve &#8230; aras\u0131nda sat\u0131\u015f vaadi s\u00f6zle\u015fmeleri d\u00fczenlendi\u011fini, ancak s\u00f6zle\u015fmeden kaynaklanan edimlerini yerine getirmemeleri nedeniyle daval\u0131lar aleyhine Bodrum 1. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesinin 2014\/35 Esas say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131yla tapu iptali ve tescil davas\u0131 a\u00e7t\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n halen muris ad\u0131na kay\u0131tl\u0131 olup elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetine tabi olmas\u0131 sebebiyle mahkemece i\u015f bu davay\u0131 a\u00e7mak \u00fczere taraflar\u0131na yetki ve s\u00fcre verildi\u011fini belirterek, dava konusu ta\u015f\u0131nmazdaki elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete \u00e7evrilerek miras paylar\u0131 oran\u0131nda daval\u0131lar ad\u0131na tescilini talep ve dava etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Daval\u0131 &#8230; vekili, davac\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 tapu iptal tescil davas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k sat\u0131\u015f vaadi s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin iptali istemiyle dava a\u00e7t\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n aktif husumet ehliyetinin bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespiti i\u00e7in an\u0131lan davan\u0131n bekletici mesele yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini belirterek, davan\u0131n reddini savunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p>Daval\u0131lar &#8230;, &#8230;, &#8230; ve &#8230;, davaya bir diyeceklerinin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, dava konusu ta\u015f\u0131nmazdaki miras paylar\u0131n\u0131n adlar\u0131na tescilini istediklerini bildirmi\u015f; di\u011fer daval\u0131lar ise davaya cevap vermemi\u015flerdir.<\/p>\n<p>Mahkemece, davan\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile dava konusu ta\u015f\u0131nmazdaki elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete \u00e7evrilmesine ve ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n tamam\u0131 20 pay kabul edilmek suretiyle miras paylar\u0131 oran\u0131nda daval\u0131lar ad\u0131na tesciline karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>H\u00fckm\u00fc, davac\u0131 vekili temyiz etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclmesi davalar\u0131, elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetine konu ta\u015f\u0131n\u0131r veya ta\u015f\u0131nmaz mallarda payda\u015flar (ortaklar) aras\u0131nda mevcut birlikte m\u00fclkiyet ili\u015fkisini sona erdirip, ferdi m\u00fclkiyete ge\u00e7meyi sa\u011flayan, iki tarafl\u0131, taraflar i\u00e7in benzer sonu\u00e7lar do\u011furan davalard\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>Elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclmesi davalar\u0131, miras\u00e7\u0131lar taraf\u0131ndan a\u00e7\u0131labilir. Miras\u00e7\u0131lar d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda alacakl\u0131lar da \u0130cra \u0130flas Kanununun 121. maddesi uyar\u0131nca icra hakiminden \u201cyetki belgesi\u201d almak kayd\u0131yla bu davay\u0131 a\u00e7abilirler.<\/p>\n<p>Miras pay\u0131n\u0131 veya ki\u015fisel hakk\u0131, T\u00fcrk Bor\u00e7lar Kanununun 183. ila 204. maddeleri gere\u011fince temlik alan ki\u015filer, tapu iptali ve tescil davas\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda verilen yetki belgesine dayanarak, elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclmesini isteyemez.<\/p>\n<p>Kayna\u011f\u0131n\u0131 T\u00fcrk Bor\u00e7lar Kanununun 29. maddesinden alan ta\u015f\u0131nmaz sat\u0131\u015f vaadi s\u00f6zle\u015fmeleri de ge\u00e7erlili\u011fi resmi \u015fekil \u015fart\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 k\u0131l\u0131nan, tam iki tarafa bor\u00e7 y\u00fckleyen ve ki\u015fisel hak sa\u011flayan bir s\u00f6zle\u015fme t\u00fcr\u00fcd\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p>Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan ilkeler \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda somut olaya gelince; sat\u0131\u015f vaadi alacakl\u0131s\u0131 olan davac\u0131n\u0131n, sat\u0131\u015f vaadi s\u00f6zle\u015fmesine dayal\u0131 olarak a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 tapu iptali ve tescil davas\u0131nda verilen yetkiye dayanarak, elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete \u00e7evrilmesini talep etme hakk\u0131 bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>O halde mahkemece, davan\u0131n aktif husumet yoklu\u011fu nedeniyle reddine karar verilmesi gerekirken, i\u015fin esas\u0131na girilerek yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 do\u011fru g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f; bu nedenle h\u00fckm\u00fcn bozulmas\u0131na karar vermek gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>SONU\u00c7: Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle temyiz olunan h\u00fckm\u00fcn BOZULMASINA, bozma nedenine g\u00f6re sair temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n \u015fimdilik incelenmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, pe\u015fin yat\u0131r\u0131lan harc\u0131n yat\u0131rana iadesine, 11.11.2021 tarihinde oy birli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>T.C.<\/p>\n<p>Yarg\u0131tay<\/p>\n<p>14. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n<p>2018\/2772 E. , 2021\/4361 K.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>14. Hukuk Dairesi<br \/>\nMAHKEMES\u0130 :Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesi<\/p>\n<p>Davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan, daval\u0131lar aleyhine 30\/09\/2011 ve 15\/02\/2012 g\u00fcnlerinde verilen dilek\u00e7eler ile elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete \u00e7evrilmesi talebi \u00fczerine yap\u0131lan duru\u015fma sonunda; davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne dair verilen 28\/05\/2015 g\u00fcnl\u00fc h\u00fckm\u00fcn Yarg\u0131tayca incelenmesi daval\u0131 &#8230; vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenilmekle s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin kabul\u00fcne karar verildikten sonra dosya ve i\u00e7erisindeki b\u00fct\u00fcn ka\u011f\u0131tlar incelenerek gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p>_ K A R A R _<\/p>\n<p>Dava, elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete \u00e7evrilmesi istemine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p>Davac\u0131, taraflar\u0131n i\u015ftirak halinde malik oldu\u011fu 10 adet ta\u015f\u0131nmaz \u00fczerindeki elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete \u00e7evrilmesini talep etmi\u015f; birle\u015ftirilen davada ise tapu kay\u0131t malikleri Ahmet Tekta\u015f ile \u015eerif \u00d6rdek&#8217;in \u00f6l\u00fc olduklar\u0131n\u0131n anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 \u00fczerine temin edilen miras\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k belgeleri uyar\u0131nca miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131na husumet y\u00f6nelterek ayn\u0131 taleplerde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p>As\u0131l davada daval\u0131lar &#8230;, &#8230;, &#8230;, &#8230;, &#8230;, &#8230;,.., &#8230;, &#8230;, &#8230;, &#8230;, &#8230;, &#8230;, &#8230;, &#8230;, &#8230;, &#8230; ve &#8230;, davay\u0131 kabul ettiklerini bildirmi\u015f; di\u011fer daval\u0131lar davaya cevap vermemi\u015flerdir.<br \/>\nBirle\u015ftirilen davada daval\u0131 &#8230; vekili ile daval\u0131 &#8230;, davay\u0131 kabul ettiklerini bildirmi\u015f; di\u011fer daval\u0131lardan &#8230; ve &#8230; (&#8230; o\u011flu) d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndakiler duru\u015fmaya kat\u0131lmalar\u0131na ra\u011fmen mahkemece, davaya kar\u015f\u0131 beyanlar\u0131 al\u0131nmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>Mahkemece, davan\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile dava konusu ta\u015f\u0131nmazlarda taraflar aras\u0131ndaki elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin 23.05.2015 havale tarihli bilirki\u015fi raporunda belirtildi\u011fi \u015fekilde payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete \u00e7evrilmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>H\u00fckm\u00fc, daval\u0131 &#8230; vekili temyiz etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclmesi davalar\u0131, elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetine konu ta\u015f\u0131n\u0131r veya ta\u015f\u0131nmaz mallarda payda\u015flar (ortaklar) aras\u0131nda mevcut birlikte m\u00fclkiyet ili\u015fkisini sona erdirip ferdi m\u00fclkiyete ge\u00e7meyi sa\u011flayan, iki tarafl\u0131, taraflar i\u00e7in benzer sonu\u00e7lar do\u011furan davalard\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>TMK\u2019n\u0131n 644. maddesi gere\u011fince bir miras\u00e7\u0131, terekeye dahil mallar\u0131n tamam\u0131 veya bir k\u0131sm\u0131 \u00fczerindeki elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclmesi isteminde bulundu\u011fu takdirde sulh hakimi, di\u011fer miras\u00e7\u0131lara \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131da bulunarak belirleyece\u011fi s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde varsa itirazlar\u0131n\u0131 bildirmeye davet eder.<\/p>\n<p>Elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin devam\u0131n\u0131 hakl\u0131 k\u0131lacak bir itiraz ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclmedi\u011fi veya miras\u00e7\u0131lardan biri belirlenen s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde payla\u015fma davas\u0131 a\u00e7mad\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde, istem konusu mal \u00fczerindeki elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclmesine karar verilir.<\/p>\n<p>Miras\u00e7\u0131lara g\u00f6nderilecek davetiyede &#8220;belirlenen s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin devam\u0131n\u0131 hakl\u0131 k\u0131lacak bir itiraz ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclmedi\u011fi veya payla\u015fma davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde istem konusu mal \u00fczerindeki elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclmesine karar verilece\u011finin&#8221; bildirilmesi zorunludur.<\/p>\n<p>Elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclmesi davalar\u0131n\u0131 miras\u00e7\u0131lar a\u00e7abilir. Miras\u00e7\u0131lar d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda alacakl\u0131lar da \u0130cra \u0130flas Kanununun 121. maddesi uyar\u0131nca icra hakiminden \u201cyetki belgesi\u201d almak kayd\u0131yla bu davay\u0131 a\u00e7abilirler.<\/p>\n<p>Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan ilkeler \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda somut olaya gelince; dosya i\u00e7erisinde mevcut tapu kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesinde, dava konusu her 10 adet ta\u015f\u0131nmazda da &#8220;&#8230;&#8221; isminde bir payda\u015f\u0131n bulundu\u011fu, ancak an\u0131lan kay\u0131t malikinin davada taraf olarak yer almad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>Bu durumda mahkemece, davada taraf olarak yer almayan kay\u0131t maliki&#8230;&#8217;nin; \u00f6l\u00fc olmas\u0131 halinde temin edilecek miras\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k belgesine g\u00f6re miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n davaya kat\u0131l\u0131m\u0131 sa\u011fland\u0131ktan sonra i\u015fin esas\u0131 hakk\u0131nda bir karar verilmesi gerekirken, taraf te\u015fkili sa\u011flanmaks\u0131z\u0131n, yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 do\u011fru g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f; bu nedenle h\u00fckm\u00fcn bozulmas\u0131na karar vermek gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Kabule g\u00f6re de, birle\u015ftirilen davada daval\u0131lar &#8230;, &#8230; ve &#8230;&#8217;\u0131n karar ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131nda daval\u0131 olarak g\u00f6sterilmemesi de do\u011fru de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p>SONU\u00c7: Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle daval\u0131 &#8230; vekilinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile h\u00fckm\u00fcn BOZULMASINA, bozma nedenine g\u00f6re sair temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n \u015fimdilik incelenmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, pe\u015fin yat\u0131r\u0131lan harc\u0131n istek halinde yat\u0131rana iadesine,<br \/>\n28.06.2021 tarihinde oy birli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>T.C.<\/p>\n<p>Yarg\u0131tay<\/p>\n<p>14. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n<p>2018\/4363 E. , 2021\/3137 K.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>MAHKEMES\u0130 : Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesi<\/p>\n<p>Davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan, daval\u0131lar aleyhine 04\/04\/2014 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde verilen dilek\u00e7e ile elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete \u00e7evrilmesi talebi \u00fczerine yap\u0131lan duru\u015fma sonunda; davan\u0131n HMK&#8217;n\u0131n 114\/1-b delaletiyle 115\/2. maddesi gere\u011fince hukuki yarar yoklu\u011fundan usulden reddine dair verilen 16\/10\/2014 g\u00fcnl\u00fc h\u00fckm\u00fcn Yarg\u0131tayca incelenmesi davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenilmekle s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin kabul\u00fcne karar verildikten sonra dosya ve i\u00e7erisindeki b\u00fct\u00fcn ka\u011f\u0131tlar incelenerek gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p>K A R A R<\/p>\n<p>Dava, elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete \u00e7evrilmesi iste\u011fine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p>Mahkemece, 5831 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 8. maddesi ile 3402 say\u0131l\u0131 Kadastro Kanununa eklenen ek 3. madde gere\u011fince elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcrme yetkisinin tapu sicil m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fcklerine ait oldu\u011fu, talebin reddi halinde mahkemeye ba\u015fvurulabilece\u011fi, hukuki yarar yoklu\u011fu nedeniyle davan\u0131n usulden reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>H\u00fckm\u00fc, davac\u0131 vekili temyiz etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>5831 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun ile 3402 say\u0131l\u0131 Kadastro Kanununa eklenen ek 3. madde ile &#8220;bir miras\u00e7\u0131n\u0131n, miras ortakl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan do\u011fan elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclmesi isteminde bulundu\u011fu takdirde tapu sicil m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn, di\u011fer miras\u00e7\u0131lara \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131da bulunarak belirleyece\u011fi s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde varsa itirazlar\u0131n\u0131 bildirmeye davet edece\u011fi, elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin devam\u0131na y\u00f6nelik bir itiraz ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclmedi\u011fi veya miras\u00e7\u0131lardan herhangi biri belirlenen s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde payla\u015fma davas\u0131 a\u00e7mad\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde, istem konusu ta\u015f\u0131nmaz mal \u00fczerindeki elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyeti payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclerek, hissedarl\u0131k esaslar\u0131na g\u00f6re miras\u00e7\u0131lar ad\u0131na tapu k\u00fct\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne tescil edilece\u011fi&#8221; \u015feklinde bir d\u00fczenlemeye yer verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu&#8217;nun 644. maddesi gere\u011fince; bir miras\u00e7\u0131, terekeye dahil mallar\u0131n tamam\u0131 veya bir k\u0131sm\u0131 \u00fczerindeki elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclmesi isteminde bulundu\u011fu takdirde sulh hakimi, di\u011fer miras\u00e7\u0131lara \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131da bulunarak belirleyece\u011fi s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde varsa itirazlar\u0131n\u0131 bildirmeye davet eder.<br \/>\nElbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin devam\u0131n\u0131 hakl\u0131 k\u0131lacak bir itiraz ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclmedi\u011fi veya miras\u00e7\u0131lardan biri belirlenen s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde payla\u015fma davas\u0131 a\u00e7mad\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde, istem konusu mal \u00fczerindeki elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclmesine karar verilir.<\/p>\n<p>Miras\u00e7\u0131lara g\u00f6nderilecek davetiyede &#8220;belirlenen s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin devam\u0131n\u0131 hakl\u0131 k\u0131lacak bir itiraz ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclmedi\u011fi veya payla\u015fma davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde istem konusu mal \u00fczerindeki elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclmesine karar verilece\u011finin&#8221; bildirilmesi zorunludur.<\/p>\n<p>Bu t\u00fcr davalarda miras\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k belgesine at\u0131f yap\u0131lmakla yetinilmemeli; h\u00fck\u00fcm sonucunda infazda teredd\u00fcte neden olunmayacak \u015fekilde elbirli\u011fi halindeki m\u00fclkiyetin veya pay\u0131n miras\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k belgesindeki paylar oran\u0131nda payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete \u00e7evrilmesine karar verilmelidir.<\/p>\n<p>Mahkemece, 5831 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun ile 3402 say\u0131l\u0131 Kadastro Kanununa eklenen ek 3. madde ile elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclmesi konusunda tapu sicil m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn g\u00f6revlendirildi\u011finden bahisle davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015f ise de; bu h\u00fck\u00fcm 4721 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu&#8217;nun 644. maddesini y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckten kald\u0131rmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. An\u0131lan madde ile, &#8220;bir miras\u00e7\u0131, terekeye dahil mallar\u0131n tamam\u0131 veya bir k\u0131sm\u0131 \u00fczerindeki elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclmesi isteminde bulundu\u011fu takdirde sulh hakimi, di\u011fer miras\u00e7\u0131lara \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131da bulunarak belirleyece\u011fi s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde varsa itirazlar\u0131n\u0131 bildirmeye davet eder. Elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin devam\u0131n\u0131 hakl\u0131 k\u0131lacak bir itiraz ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclmedi\u011fi veya miras\u00e7\u0131lardan biri belirlenen s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde payla\u015fma davas\u0131 a\u00e7mad\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde, istem konusu mal \u00fczerindeki elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclmesine karar verilir&#8221; h\u00fckm\u00fcne yer verilmi\u015ftir. Bu itibarla, davac\u0131n\u0131n dava konusu edilen ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclmesini dava yoluyla talep etmesinde bir usuls\u00fczl\u00fck bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle mahkemece, i\u015fin esas\u0131 incelenerek sonucuna g\u00f6re bir karar verilmesi gerekirken yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesi do\u011fru g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Kabule g\u00f6re; daval\u0131lardan &#8230;&#8217;a TMK&#8217;n\u0131n 644. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen \u015ferhi i\u00e7eren davetiye tebli\u011f edilmedi\u011fi, daval\u0131lardan &#8230; ve &#8230;&#8217;a ise ilk seferde do\u011frudan adres kay\u0131t sistemindeki adreslerine Tebligat Kanunu&#8217;nun 21\/2. maddesine g\u00f6re tebli\u011f edildikleri ve usul\u00fcne uygun olmad\u0131klar\u0131, anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 7201 say\u0131l\u0131 Tebligat Kanununda 6099 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun ile yap\u0131lan de\u011fi\u015fiklikler de nazara al\u0131narak T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu&#8217;nun 644. maddesi gere\u011fince ihtaratl\u0131 dava dilek\u00e7esi ad\u0131 ge\u00e7en daval\u0131lara tebli\u011f edildikten sonra, i\u015fin esas\u0131 hakk\u0131nda bir karar verilmesi gerekirken bu hususun g\u00f6z ard\u0131 edilmesi de do\u011fru olmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<br \/>\nH\u00fckm\u00fcn bu nedenlerle bozulmas\u0131 gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>SONU\u00c7: Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle davac\u0131 vekilinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile h\u00fckm\u00fcn BOZULMASINA, pe\u015fin yat\u0131r\u0131lan harc\u0131n yat\u0131rana iadesine, 28.04.2021 tarihinde oybirli\u011fi ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>T.C.<\/p>\n<p>Yarg\u0131tay<\/p>\n<p>7. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n<p>2023\/482 E., 2023\/2805 K.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>MAHKEMES\u0130 : Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesi<\/p>\n<p>Taraflar aras\u0131nda \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesinde g\u00f6r\u00fclen elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete \u00e7evrilmesi davas\u0131nda verilen karar hakk\u0131nda yap\u0131lan temyiz incelemesi sonucunda, Yarg\u0131tay 14. Hukuk Dairesince \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n bozulmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince bozmaya uyularak yeniden yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonucunda; davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi karar\u0131 davac\u0131lar vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmekle; kesinlik, s\u00fcre, temyiz \u015fart\u0131 ve di\u011fer usul eksiklikleri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yap\u0131lan \u00f6n inceleme sonucunda temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin kabul\u00fcne karar verildikten sonra, dosyadaki belgeler incelenip gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p>I. DAVA<br \/>\nDavac\u0131lar dava dilek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zetle; muris &#8230;..&#8217;tan miras yoluyla intikal eden 1486 ada, 42 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ve iki d\u00fckkan\u0131 olan kargir ev nitelikli ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n miras\u00e7\u0131lar aras\u0131nda elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyeti halinde bulundu\u011funu, bu ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n \u0130stanbul Anadolu 21. Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesinin 1990\/817 say\u0131l\u0131 tereke dosyas\u0131nda TMK 640-maddesi gere\u011fince atanan temsilci Av. &#8230;.. taraf\u0131ndan idare edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrerek dava konusu ta\u015f\u0131nmaz \u00fczerindeki el birli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclmesine karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>II. CEVAP<br \/>\nDaval\u0131 cevap dilek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zetle; dava konusu ta\u015f\u0131nmazla ilgili \u0130stanbul 9. Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesi&#8217;nin 2013\/492 Esas say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131yla ortakl\u0131\u011f\u0131n sat\u0131\u015f suretiyle giderilmesi davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyanla davan\u0131n reddini istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>III. \u0130LK DERECE MAHKEMES\u0130 KARARI<br \/>\n\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesinin 05.04.2016 tarihli ve 2015\/1216 Esas, 2016\/317 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla; ayn\u0131 konuda m\u00fckerrer dava a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>IV. BOZMA VE BOZMADAN SONRAK\u0130 YARGILAMA S\u00dcREC\u0130<br \/>\nA. Bozma Karar\u0131<br \/>\n1. \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesinin 05.04.2016 tarihli ve 2015\/1216 Esas, 2016\/317 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde davac\u0131 vekili temyiz isteminde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p>2. Yarg\u0131tay 14. Hukuk Dairesi&#8217;nin 07.09.2020 tarih ve 2020\/1326 Esas, 2020\/4586 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131nda; &#8220;davac\u0131lar vekili dava konusu 1486 ada 42 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmazda taraflar aras\u0131nda bulunan elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete \u00e7evrilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir. Dava konusu ta\u015f\u0131nmazla ilgili \u0130stanbul 9. Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesinin 2013\/492 Esas say\u0131l\u0131 ortakl\u0131\u011f\u0131n giderilmesi istemli davada cins tashihinin yapt\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 ve elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete \u00e7evrilmesi i\u00e7in davac\u0131lara yetki verildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Davac\u0131lar, 26.02.2015 tarihinde \u0130stanbul 5. Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesinin 2015\/190 Esas say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131 ile dava konusu ta\u015f\u0131nmazda elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete \u00e7evrilmesini talep etmesi \u00fczerine mahkemece i\u015f b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc sebebiyle ahkam\u0131 \u015fahsiye davalar\u0131na bakmakla g\u00f6revli sulh hukuk mahkemesine tevzi edilmek \u00fczere tevzi b\u00fcrosuna g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi, sonras\u0131nda \u0130stanbul 3. Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesinin 2015\/278 Esas say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131nda 2015\/435 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 14.04.2015 tarihli karar\u0131nda g\u00f6revsizlik karar\u0131 verildi\u011fi, taraflarca temyiz edilmeyerek kesinle\u015fti\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Davac\u0131lar vekili taraf\u0131ndan elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete \u00e7evrilmesi istemiyle a\u00e7\u0131lan davada verilen karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde mahkemece daha \u00f6nce karar verildi\u011fi s\u00f6ylenen ayn\u0131 mahkemenin 2015\/278 Esas say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131nda g\u00f6revsizlik sebebine dayal\u0131 g\u00f6nderme karar\u0131 bulundu\u011fu ve bu karar \u00fczerine ba\u015fkaca mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete \u00e7evrilmesine karar verilmemi\u015f oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, mahkemece talep hakk\u0131nda bir karar verilmesi gerekirken yanl\u0131\u015f de\u011ferlendirme ile yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde karar verilmesinin do\u011fru g\u00f6r\u00fclmedi\u011fi&#8221; gerek\u00e7esiyle h\u00fckm\u00fcn bozulmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>B. \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince Bozmaya Uyularak Verilen Karar<br \/>\n\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi, yukar\u0131da tarih ve say\u0131s\u0131 belirtilen karar\u0131yla; &#8220;\u0130stanbul 9. Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesi&#8217;nin 2013\/492 Esas say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131 ile mevcut dosyadaki&#8217; davaya konu ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n ayn\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar oldu\u011fu; mevcut davan\u0131n, elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclmesi istemine ili\u015fkin oldu\u011fu ancak ayn\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n ortakl\u0131\u011f\u0131n giderilmesi talebi ile \u0130stanbul 9. Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesi&#8217;nin 2013\/492 Esas say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131na konu yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, TMK&#8217;nun 644\/2. maddesi uyar\u0131nca ortakl\u0131\u011f\u0131n giderilmesi davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lan hallerde elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclmesinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, somut olayda ayn\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaza y\u00f6nelik derdest Ortakl\u0131\u011f\u0131n Giderilmesi davas\u0131 bulunmas\u0131 ve TMK&#8217;nun 644\/2. maddesi uyar\u0131nca ortakl\u0131\u011f\u0131n giderilmesi davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lan hallerde Elbirli\u011fi M\u00fclkiyetinin Payl\u0131 M\u00fclkiyete D\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclmesinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131&#8221; gerek\u00e7esiyle davan\u0131n reddine karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>V. TEMY\u0130Z<br \/>\nA. Temyiz Yoluna Ba\u015fvuranlar<br \/>\n\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da belirtilen karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde davac\u0131lar vekili temyiz isteminde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p>B. Temyiz Sebepleri<br \/>\n1. Davac\u0131 &#8230; ve &#8230; vekili temyiz dilek\u00e7esinde; \u0130stanbul 9. Sulh Hukuk mahkemesi dosyas\u0131n\u0131n temyiz a\u015famas\u0131nda oldu\u011funu ve hisse oranlar\u0131n\u0131n o dosya ile tespit edilece\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p>2. &#8230; miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131 &#8230; ve &#8230;; karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esiz olarak reddedilmesi nedeniyle adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini, cins tashihi yap\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete \u00e7evrilmesi gerekti\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p>C. Gerek\u00e7e<br \/>\n1. Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k ve Hukuki Nitelendirme<br \/>\nDosya i\u00e7eri\u011fine, bozman\u0131n mahiyeti ve kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re taraflar aras\u0131ndaki uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k, elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete \u00e7evrilmesi istemine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p>2. \u0130lgili Hukuk<br \/>\n1. 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun ge\u00e7ici 3 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131 atf\u0131yla uygulanmas\u0131na devam olunan m\u00fclga 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Usul\u00fc Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun (1086 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun) 428 inci maddesi, 438 inci maddesinin yedi, sekiz ve dokuzuncu f\u0131kralar\u0131 ile 439 uncu maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131.<\/p>\n<p>2. 4721 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu&#8217;nun 644. maddesi.<\/p>\n<p>3. De\u011ferlendirme<br \/>\n1. Mahkemelerin nihai kararlar\u0131n\u0131n bozulmas\u0131 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un ge\u00e7ici 3 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131 atf\u0131yla uygulanmas\u0131na devam olunan m\u00fclga 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 428 inci maddesi ile 439 uncu maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda yer alan sebeplerden birinin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 h\u00e2linde m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p>2. Temyizen incelenen Mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n bozmaya uygun oldu\u011fu, kararda ve karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde hukuk kurallar\u0131n\u0131n somut olaya uygulanmas\u0131nda bir isabetsizlik bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bozmaya uyulmakla kar\u015f\u0131 taraf yarar\u0131na kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f hak durumunu olu\u015fturan y\u00f6nlerin ise yeniden incelenmesine hukuk\u00e7a imk\u00e2n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmakla; temyiz dilek\u00e7esinde ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen nedenler karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirecek nitelikte g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>VI. KARAR<br \/>\nA\u00e7\u0131klanan sebeplerle;<br \/>\nDavac\u0131lar vekilinin yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmeyen t\u00fcm temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddi ile usul ve kanuna uygun olan karar\u0131n ONANMASINA,<\/p>\n<p>A\u015fa\u011f\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 temyiz giderinin temyiz edene y\u00fckletilmesine,<\/p>\n<p>Dosyan\u0131n \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmesine,<\/p>\n<p>Karar\u0131n tebli\u011finden 15 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde karar d\u00fczeltme yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere,<\/p>\n<p>24.05.2023 tarihinde oy birli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>T.C.<\/p>\n<p>Yarg\u0131tay<\/p>\n<p>7. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n<p>2024\/569 E. , 2024\/1723 K.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>MAHKEMES\u0130 :Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesi<br \/>\nSAYISI : 2023\/672 E., 2023\/1459 K.<br \/>\nKARAR : Davan\u0131n onanan k\u0131sm\u0131 ile ilgili karar verilmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, bozulan k\u0131s\u0131m ile ilgili davan\u0131n reddine<\/p>\n<p>Taraflar aras\u0131nda elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete \u00e7evrilmesi davas\u0131nda verilen karar hakk\u0131nda yap\u0131lan temyiz incelemesi sonucunda, Dairece Mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n bozulmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Mahkemece bozmaya uyularak yeniden yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonucunda; davan\u0131n onanan k\u0131sm\u0131 ile ilgili karar verilmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, bozulan k\u0131s\u0131m ile ilgili davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Mahkeme karar\u0131 davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmekle; kesinlik, s\u00fcre, temyiz \u015fart\u0131 ve di\u011fer usul eksiklikleri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yap\u0131lan \u00f6n inceleme sonucunda, temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin kabul\u00fcne karar verildikten ve Tetkik H\u00e2kimi taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan rapor dinlendikten sonra dosyadaki belgeler incelenip gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p>I. DAVA<br \/>\nDavac\u0131 vekili, taraflar\u0131n miras b\u0131rakan\u0131 &#8230;\u2019in vefat etti\u011fini, dava konusu 30792 ada 8 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmazda 3 katl\u0131 bina, 10446 ada 14 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmazda 5 katl\u0131 bina, 754 (yeni 2887 ada 4) parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmazda yer alan motel ile bankada mevduat hesab\u0131nda bulan paran\u0131n ve 35 AP 9805 plaka say\u0131l\u0131 arac\u0131n taraflarca payla\u015f\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek, miras b\u0131rakandan intikal eden terekeye dahil t\u00fcm menkul ve gayrimenkul mallar ile bu mallar\u0131n gelirlerinden do\u011fan hak ve alacak \u00fczerindeki elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete \u00e7evrilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>II. CEVAP<br \/>\n1. Daval\u0131lardan &#8230;, davan\u0131n \u0130zmir Mahkemelerinde a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini, Karaba\u011flar il\u00e7esinde bulunan 8 ve 14 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar ile Menderes il\u00e7esinde bulunan 754 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmazlara y\u00f6nelik kesin yetki sebebiyle ret karar\u0131 verilmesi gerekti\u011fini, motelin daval\u0131lardan &#8230; ve &#8230;\u2019in yurtd\u0131\u015f\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131 gelirleriyle yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu nedenle davac\u0131n\u0131n miras hakk\u0131n\u0131n olamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131, yine arac\u0131n da bedelinin ad\u0131 ge\u00e7en daval\u0131lar\u0131n taraf\u0131ndan kar\u015f\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n yine hak sahibi olamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131 ayn\u0131 zamanda bu araca ili\u015fkin olarak Kar\u015f\u0131yaka 3. Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesinde 2015\/1356 Esas say\u0131l\u0131 dava dosyas\u0131yla ortakl\u0131\u011f\u0131n giderilmesi davas\u0131 a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u015fuan davan\u0131n derdest oldu\u011funu, ayr\u0131ca Kar\u015f\u0131yaka 3. Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesinde 2015\/1322 Esas say\u0131l\u0131 vasiyetnamenin a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 talepli dava ile ayn\u0131 yer 2. Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesinde tereke temsilcisi atanmas\u0131 talepli 2015\/1349 Esas say\u0131l\u0131 davalar\u0131n\u0131n da a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011funu belirterek, davan\u0131n reddini istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>2. Daval\u0131lardan &#8230; ve &#8230; ortak vekili ise \u0130zmir 9. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesinde 2016\/121 Esas say\u0131l\u0131 dava dosyas\u0131 ile 14 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaza y\u00f6nelik olarak, Menderes 1. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesinin 2016\/98 Esas say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131nda ise 4 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaza y\u00f6nelik olarak inan\u00e7 anla\u015fmas\u0131na dayal\u0131 tapu iptali ve tescil davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve Menderes Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesinin 2015\/942 Esas say\u0131l\u0131 dava dosyas\u0131 ile de 4 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaza y\u00f6nelik ortakl\u0131\u011f\u0131n giderilmesi davalar\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek davan\u0131n reddini savunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p>III. MAHKEME KARARI<\/p>\n<p>Mahkemenin 15.11.2021 tarihli ve 2020\/1580 Esas, 2021\/1439 Karar davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>IV. BOZMA VE BOZMADAN SONRAK\u0130 YARGILAMA S\u00dcREC\u0130<\/p>\n<p>A. Bozma Karar\u0131<br \/>\n1. \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesinin 15.11.2021 tarihli ve 2020\/1580 Esas, 2021\/1439 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde daval\u0131lar &#8230;, &#8230; vekili ile daval\u0131 &#8230; temyiz isteminde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p>2. Dairemizin 14.11.2022 tarih ve2022\/6459 Esas, 2022\/6858 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131nda;<br \/>\n1. Yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamaya, toplanan delillere ve dosya i\u00e7eri\u011fine g\u00f6re; dava konusu \u0130\u015f Bankas\u0131 Karaba\u011flar \u015eubesinde miras b\u0131rakan ad\u0131na kay\u0131tl\u0131 bulunan, TR&#8230; \u0130BAN numaral\u0131 mevduat hesab\u0131ndaki para, Vak\u0131fbank Kar\u015f\u0131yaka \u015eubesinde miras b\u0131rakan ad\u0131na kay\u0131tl\u0131 bulunan TR &#8230; \u0130BAN numaral\u0131 vadeli hesap, Vak\u0131fbank Kar\u015f\u0131yaka \u015fubesinde miras b\u0131rakan ad\u0131na kay\u0131tl\u0131 bulunan TR &#8230; \u0130BAN numaral\u0131 vadeli hesap, miras b\u0131rakan ad\u0131na kay\u0131tl\u0131, \u0130zmir ili, Karaba\u011flar il\u00e7esi, &#8230; Mahallesi, 10446 ada 14 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 bodrum ve zemin kat dahil 5 katl\u0131 i\u015f yeri niteli\u011findeki ta\u015f\u0131nmaz y\u00f6n\u00fcnden verilen mahkeme karar\u0131 ve dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7eler usul ve yasaya uygun bulundu\u011fundan, yerinde olmayan temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddiyle h\u00fckm\u00fcn bu menkul ve gayrimenkul mallar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden h\u00fckm\u00fcn onanmas\u0131na,<\/p>\n<p>2. Dava konusu 30792 ada 8 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaz hakk\u0131nda \u0130zmir 3. Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesinin 2018\/941 Esas, 2019\/712 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 davas\u0131nda yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda 30792 ada 8 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaz \u00fczerindeki ortakl\u0131\u011f\u0131n sat\u0131\u015f yoluyla giderilmesine karar verildi\u011fi, h\u00fckm\u00fcn 08.12.2020 tarihinde kesinle\u015fti\u011fi; \u0130zmir ili, Menderes il\u00e7esi, G\u00fcm\u00fcld\u00fcr K\u00f6y\u00fc, 754 (2887 ada 4) parsel say\u0131l\u0131 motel i\u015fletmesi olarak kullan\u0131lan ve birden fazla ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcmden olu\u015fan ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar hakk\u0131nda Menderes 3. Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesinin 2015\/942 Esas say\u0131s\u0131 ile a\u00e7\u0131lan ortakl\u0131\u011f\u0131n giderilmesi davas\u0131n\u0131n halen derdest oldu\u011fu; &#8230; plakal\u0131 ara\u00e7 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden a\u00e7\u0131lan Kar\u015f\u0131yaka 3. Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesinin 2015\/1356 Esas, 2016\/1046 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 davas\u0131nda yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda menkul mal \u00fczerindeki ortakl\u0131\u011f\u0131n sat\u0131\u015f yoluyla giderilmesine karar verildi\u011fi, h\u00fckm\u00fcn 21.11.2016 tarihinde kesinle\u015fti\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Mahkemece terekeye ait bu mallar hakk\u0131nda elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclmesi talebinin reddine karar verilmesi gerekirken, kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi do\u011fru g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f, karar\u0131n bu nedenlerle bozulmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>B. Mahkemece Bozmaya Uyularak Verilen Karar<br \/>\n\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi, yukar\u0131da tarih ve say\u0131s\u0131 belirtilen karar\u0131yla; davan\u0131n onanan k\u0131s\u0131m ile ilgili karar verilmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, bozulan k\u0131s\u0131m ile ilgili olarak davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>V. TEMY\u0130Z<br \/>\nA. Temyiz Yoluna Ba\u015fvuranlar<br \/>\n\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da belirtilen karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde davac\u0131 vekili temyiz isteminde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p>B. Temyiz Sebepleri<br \/>\nDavac\u0131 vekili h\u00fckm\u00fc yarg\u0131lama giderleri ve vekalet \u00fccretinin hatal\u0131 oldu\u011funu belirterek temyiz etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>C. Gerek\u00e7e<br \/>\n1. Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k ve Hukuki Nitelendirme<br \/>\nDosya i\u00e7eri\u011fine, bozman\u0131n mahiyeti ve kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re taraflar aras\u0131ndaki uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k, elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete \u00e7evrilmesi istemine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p>2. \u0130lgili Hukuk<br \/>\n1. 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun ge\u00e7ici 3 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131 atf\u0131yla uygulanmas\u0131na devam olunan m\u00fclga 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Usul\u00fc Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun (1086 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun) 428 inci maddesi, 438 inci maddesinin yedi, sekiz ve dokuzuncu f\u0131kralar\u0131 ile 439 uncu maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131.<\/p>\n<p>2. 4721 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu&#8217;nun 644 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddesi.<\/p>\n<p>3. De\u011ferlendirme<br \/>\n1. Mahkemelerin nihai kararlar\u0131n\u0131n bozulmas\u0131 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un ge\u00e7ici 3 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131 atf\u0131yla uygulanmas\u0131na devam olunan m\u00fclga 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 428 inci maddesi ile 439 uncu maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda yer alan sebeplerden birinin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 h\u00e2linde m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p>2. Temyizen incelenen Mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n bozmaya uygun oldu\u011fu, kararda ve karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde hukuk kurallar\u0131n\u0131n somut olaya uygulanmas\u0131nda bir isabetsizlik bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bozmaya uyulmakla kar\u015f\u0131 taraf yarar\u0131na kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f hak durumunu olu\u015fturan y\u00f6nlerin ise yeniden incelenmesine hukuk\u00e7a imk\u00e2n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmakla; temyiz dilek\u00e7esinde ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen nedenler karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirecek nitelikte g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>VI. KARAR<\/p>\n<p>A\u00e7\u0131klanan sebeplerle;<\/p>\n<p>Davac\u0131lar vekilinin yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmeyen t\u00fcm temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddi ile usul ve kanuna uygun olan karar\u0131n ONANMASINA,<\/p>\n<p>Onama harc\u0131 davac\u0131dan pe\u015fin al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan yeniden al\u0131nmas\u0131na yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na,<\/p>\n<p>Dosyan\u0131n \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmesine,<\/p>\n<p>25.03.2024 tarihinde oy birli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>T.C.<\/p>\n<p>Yarg\u0131tay<\/p>\n<p>7. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n<p>2022\/4859 E. , 2022\/5880 K.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>MAHKEMES\u0130 :Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesi<\/p>\n<p>Davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan, daval\u0131lar aleyhine 05.02.2015 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde verilen dilek\u00e7e ile elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetin payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete \u00e7evrilmesi talebi \u00fczerine Yarg\u0131tay 14. Hukuk Dairesinin bozma ilam\u0131na uyularak yap\u0131lan duru\u015fma sonunda; davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne dair verilen 18.11.2021 g\u00fcnl\u00fc h\u00fckm\u00fcn Yarg\u0131tayca incelenmesi bir k\u0131s\u0131m daval\u0131lar vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenilmekle s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin kabul\u00fcne karar verildikten sonra dosya ve i\u00e7erisindeki b\u00fct\u00fcn ka\u011f\u0131tlar incelenerek gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p>KARAR<\/p>\n<p>Dava, elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclmesi istemine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p>Davac\u0131lar vekili, dava konusu 181 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n \u00bd hissesindeki elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclmesini talep etmi\u015flerdir.<\/p>\n<p>Daval\u0131 &#8230;, davan\u0131n reddini savunmu\u015f; daval\u0131lar &#8230;, &#8230;, &#8230;, &#8230;, &#8230; ve &#8230; davay\u0131 kabul etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Mahkemece davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015f, daval\u0131 &#8230;\u2019\u0131n temyizi \u00fczerine Yarg\u0131tay 14. Hukuk Dairesinin 26.02.2019 tarihli, 2016\/1781 Esas, 2019\/1698 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131yla h\u00fckm\u00fcn bozulmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Davac\u0131 vekili 06.10.2020 tarihli dilek\u00e7esiyle imar uygulamas\u0131 sonucu dava konusu 181 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n 164 ada 2 ve 15 parsel, 134 ada 6 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmazlara d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, 134 ada 6 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaz y\u00f6n\u00fcnden davaya devam etmediklerini di\u011fer parseller y\u00f6n\u00fcnden davaya devam ettiklerini beyan etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Mahkemece bozma ilam\u0131na uyularak yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonucunda 164 ada 2 ve 15 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne, 134 ada 6 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaz hakk\u0131nda bir karar verilmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karar verilmi\u015ftir.<br \/>\nH\u00fckm\u00fc, bir k\u0131s\u0131m daval\u0131lar vekili temyiz etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>TMK\u2019n\u0131n 644. maddesi gere\u011fince bir miras\u00e7\u0131, terekeye dahil mallar\u0131n tamam\u0131 veya bir k\u0131sm\u0131 \u00fczerindeki elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclmesi isteminde bulundu\u011fu takdirde sulh hakimi, di\u011fer miras\u00e7\u0131lara \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131da bulunarak belirleyece\u011fi s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde varsa itirazlar\u0131n\u0131 bildirmeye davet eder.<\/p>\n<p>Elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin devam\u0131n\u0131 hakl\u0131 k\u0131lacak bir itiraz ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclmedi\u011fi veya miras\u00e7\u0131lardan biri belirlenen s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde payla\u015fma davas\u0131 a\u00e7mad\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde, istem konusu mal \u00fczerindeki elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclmesine karar verilir.<\/p>\n<p>Miras\u00e7\u0131lara g\u00f6nderilecek davetiyede &#8220;belirlenen s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin devam\u0131n\u0131 hakl\u0131 k\u0131lacak bir itiraz ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclmedi\u011fi veya payla\u015fma davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde istem konusu mal \u00fczerindeki elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclmesine karar verilece\u011finin&#8221; bildirilmesi zorunludur.<\/p>\n<p>Elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclmesi davalar\u0131n\u0131 miras\u00e7\u0131lar a\u00e7abilir. Miras\u00e7\u0131lar d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda alacakl\u0131lar da \u0130cra \u0130flas Kanununun 121. maddesi uyar\u0131nca icra hakiminden &#8220;yetki belgesi&#8221; almak kayd\u0131yla bu davay\u0131 a\u00e7abilirler.<\/p>\n<p>Miras pay\u0131n\u0131 veya ki\u015fisel &#8230; Bor\u00e7lar Kanununun 162. ila 181. (TBK\u2019n\u0131n 183. ila 204.) maddeleri gere\u011fince temlik alan ki\u015filer tapu iptali ve tescil davas\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda verilen yetki belgesine dayanarak elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclmesini isteyemez.<\/p>\n<p>Bu t\u00fcr davalarda miras\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k belgesine at\u0131f yap\u0131lmakla yetinilmemeli; h\u00fck\u00fcm sonucunda infazda teredd\u00fcte neden olunmayacak \u015fekilde elbirli\u011fi halindeki m\u00fclkiyetin veya pay\u0131n miras\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k belgesindeki paylar oran\u0131nda payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete \u00e7evrilmesine karar verilmelidir.<\/p>\n<p>Somut olayda elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetine konu olan dava konusu ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n t\u00fcm tedav\u00fcll\u00fc tapu kay\u0131tlar\u0131 dosya i\u00e7erisinde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan dava \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fup olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nan bilirki\u015fi raporunda taraflar\u0131n hisselerinin do\u011fru hesaplan\u0131p hesaplanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 denetlenememektedir. Ayr\u0131ca dava konusu 134 ada 6 parsel, 164 ada 2 ve 15 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n olu\u015fmas\u0131na sebep olan imar uygulamas\u0131 10.01.2022 tarihinde iptal edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>O halde, dava konusu 181 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n t\u00fcm tedav\u00fclleriyle birlikte en g\u00fcncel tapu kayd\u0131n\u0131n ilgili tapu m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden getirtilmeli, konusunda uzman bilirki\u015fiden elbirli\u011fine konu olan pay ve miras\u00e7\u0131lara da\u011f\u0131t\u0131lacak paylar konusunda taraflar\u0131n, mahkemenin ve Yarg\u0131tay&#8217;\u0131n denetimine elveri\u015fli rapor al\u0131narak sonucuna g\u00f6re bir karar verilmelidir.<\/p>\n<p>Belirtilen hususlar \u00fczerinde durulmadan karar verilmesi do\u011fru g\u00f6r\u00fclmedi\u011finden, h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenle bozulmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>SONU\u00c7: Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle h\u00fckm\u00fcn BOZULMASINA, bozma sebebine g\u00f6re sair temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n \u015fimdilik incelenmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, pe\u015fin yat\u0131r\u0131lan harc\u0131n yat\u0131rana iadesine, karar\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren 15 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde karar d\u00fczeltme yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere, 06\/10\/2022 tarihinde oy birli\u011fi ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>T.C.<\/p>\n<p>Yarg\u0131tay<\/p>\n<p>3. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n<p>2021\/5520 E., 2021\/8706 K.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Davac\u0131 &#8230; ile daval\u0131lar &#8230; vd. aralar\u0131ndaki vasiyetnamenin tenfizi davas\u0131na dair Malatya 4. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesinden verilen 06\/11\/2013 tarihli ve 2012\/529 E. 2013\/434 K. say\u0131l\u0131 h\u00fckm\u00fcn onanmas\u0131 hakk\u0131nda Dairece verilen 03\/03\/2021 tarihli ve 2021\/523 E. 2021\/2265 K. say\u0131l\u0131 ilama kar\u015f\u0131, daval\u0131lardan &#8230; vekili taraf\u0131ndan karar\u0131n d\u00fczeltilmesi istenilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>D\u00fczeltme iste\u011finin s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131ktan sonra dosyadaki b\u00fct\u00fcn ka\u011f\u0131tlar okunup gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p>Y A R G I T A Y K A R A R I<\/p>\n<p>Davac\u0131; mirasb\u0131rakan Mahmut Sar\u0131\u2019n\u0131n, Arguvan Noterli\u011fi taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen 25\/01\/2006 tarihli ve 33 numaral\u0131 vasiyetnamesi ile Arguvan \u0130l\u00e7esi Tepeba\u011f Mahallesi Kayaba\u015f\u0131 Mevkiindeki 395 m\u00b2 evi kendisine b\u0131rakt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrerek; mirasb\u0131rakan\u0131n ta\u015f\u0131nmazdaki hissesinin tapuda ad\u0131na tescil edilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<br \/>\nDaval\u0131 &#8230; (Sar\u0131); s\u0131fat yoklu\u011fu ve dava konusu ta\u015f\u0131nmaza ili\u015fkin bahsi ge\u00e7en iddialara konu edilen hususlar\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmemi\u015f olmas\u0131 nedeniyle davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesini istemi\u015f, di\u011fer daval\u0131lar davaya cevap vermemi\u015flerdir.<\/p>\n<p>Mahkemece; davaya konu edilen Malatya \u0130li Arguvan \u0130l\u00e7esi Tepeba\u011f Mahallesi Kayaba\u015f\u0131 mevkii 240 ada 8 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmazda Abdullah o\u011flu Mahmut Sar\u0131&#8217;n\u0131n hissesinin iptali ile davac\u0131 ad\u0131na tapuya tesciline dair verilen karar; daval\u0131lardan &#8230;&#8217;\u0131n temyizi \u00fczerine, Dairece verilen 03\/03\/2021 tarihli ve 2021\/523 E. 2021\/2265 K. say\u0131l\u0131 kararla onanm\u0131\u015f; onama karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131, daval\u0131 &#8230; karar d\u00fczeltme isteminde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p>1-D\u00fczeltilmesi istenilen Yarg\u0131tay ilam\u0131nda benimsenen mahkeme karar\u0131ndaki gerek\u00e7elere g\u00f6re, daval\u0131n\u0131n HUMK&#8217;n\u0131n 440 \u0131nc\u0131 maddesindeki yaz\u0131l\u0131 hallerden hi\u00e7 birisine uymayan sair karar d\u00fczeltme iste\u011finin reddi gerekir.<\/p>\n<p>2-HMK&#8217;n\u0131n 297 nci maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda; &#8220;H\u00fckm\u00fcn sonu\u00e7 k\u0131sm\u0131nda, gerek\u00e7eye ait herhangi bir s\u00f6z tekrar edilmeksizin, taleplerden her biri hakk\u0131nda verilen h\u00fck\u00fcmle, taraflara y\u00fcklenen bor\u00e7 ve tan\u0131nan haklar\u0131n, s\u0131ra numaras\u0131 alt\u0131nda; a\u00e7\u0131k, \u015f\u00fcphe ve teredd\u00fct uyand\u0131rmayacak \u015fekilde g\u00f6sterilmesi gereklidir.\u201d h\u00fckm\u00fc yer almaktad\u0131r. Kamu d\u00fczeninden olan do\u011fru sicil olu\u015fturma ilkesi gere\u011fince hakimin infaz\u0131 kabil karar verme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc vard\u0131r. Kanun maddesinin bu a\u00e7\u0131k h\u00fckm\u00fcne g\u00f6re, mahkemelerce kurulan h\u00fck\u00fcmler infaz s\u0131ras\u0131nda teredd\u00fct ve \u015f\u00fcphe yaratmayacak nitelikte olmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>Bu a\u00e7\u0131klamalar \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda somut olay incelendi\u011finde; mirasb\u0131rakan\u0131n, vasiyete konu etti\u011fi, ta\u015f\u0131nmazda dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 ortaklarla birlikte elbirli\u011fi halinde malik oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyeti, payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclmeden verilecek karar\u0131n infaz\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>Hal b\u00f6yle olunca mahkemece; davac\u0131ya, mirasb\u0131rakan\u0131n hissesi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclmesi i\u00e7in dava a\u00e7mak \u00fczere s\u00fcre verilmesi ve bekletici sorun yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekirken, eksik inceleme ile infazda teredd\u00fct yaratacak \u015fekilde tescil karar\u0131 verilmesi usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>Ne var ki, mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n yukar\u0131da belirtilen nedenle bozulmas\u0131 gerekirken, zuhulen onand\u0131\u011f\u0131 yeniden yap\u0131lan inceleme sonucunda anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, daval\u0131n\u0131n bu y\u00f6ne ili\u015fen karar d\u00fczeltme iste\u011finin kabul\u00fcne karar vermek gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>SONU\u00c7: Yukar\u0131da birinci bentte a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle daval\u0131n\u0131n sair karar d\u00fczeltme iste\u011finin reddine, ikinci bentte a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle daval\u0131n\u0131n karar d\u00fczeltme iste\u011finin kabul\u00fc ile Dairece verilen 03\/03\/2021 tarihli ve 2021\/523 E. 2021\/2265 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 onama ilam\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ve h\u00fckm\u00fcn daval\u0131 yarar\u0131na BOZULMASINA, pe\u015fin al\u0131nan karar d\u00fczeltme harc\u0131n\u0131n istek halinde d\u00fczeltme isteyene iadesine, 21\/09\/2021 tarihinde oy birli\u011fi ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>T.C.<\/p>\n<p>Yarg\u0131tay<\/p>\n<p>3. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n<p>2015\/1587 E. , 2015\/20903 K.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>\u0130NCELENEN KARARIN<br \/>\nMAHKEMES\u0130 : \u0130STANBUL ANADOLU 13. ASL\u0130YE HUKUK MAHKEMES\u0130<br \/>\nTAR\u0130H\u0130 : 30\/09\/2014<br \/>\nNUMARASI : 2013\/104-2014\/391<\/p>\n<p>Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki vasiyetnamenin tenfizi davas\u0131n\u0131n mahkemece yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 sonucunda, davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne y\u00f6nelik olarak verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn, s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine; temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin kabul\u00fcne karar verildikten sonra, dosya i\u00e7erisindeki ka\u011f\u0131tlar okunup gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p>Y A R G I T A Y K A R A R I<\/p>\n<p>Davac\u0131 vekili dava dilek\u00e7esinde; m\u00fcteveffa R&#8230; S&#8230;&#8217;in 22\/07\/1998 tarihli el yaz\u0131s\u0131 vasiyetname ile \u00fczerine kay\u0131tl\u0131 t\u00fcm menkul ve gayrimenkulleri Dar\u00fclaceze M\u00fcessese M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne vasiyet etti\u011fini, murise ait \u0130stanbul Ba\u011flarba\u015f\u0131 Mahallesi Ba\u011flarba\u015f\u0131 Mevkii 9&#8230;. parselde kay\u0131tl\u0131 2..\/2&#8230; arsa payl\u0131 zemin 1 nolu d\u00fckkan\u0131n 1\/4 hissesi bulundu\u011funu, vasiyet\u00e7i R&#8230; S&#8230;&#8217;e ait vasiyetin Kartal 1.Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesinin 2005\/1269 Esas, 2011\/1507 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 ile a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131p okundu\u011funu ve kesinle\u015fti\u011fini, \u0130stanbul 5.Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesinin 2007\/401 Esas ve 2009\/1435 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 veraset ilam\u0131 gere\u011fince R&#8230;. S&#8230;.&#8217;in tek miras\u00e7\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n Hazine oldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrerek Recep S\u00f6nmez&#8217;e ait vasiyetnamenin tenfizine, vasiyet konusu gayrimenkul\u00fcn davac\u0131 kurum ad\u0131na tesciline karar verilmesini talep ve dava etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Daval\u0131 vekili, davan\u0131n reddini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Mahkemece, Davan\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile,dava konusu \u0130stanbul \u0130li Maltepe \u0130l\u00e7esi Ba\u011flarba\u015f\u0131 Mahallesi 30\/1 pafta 269 ada 945 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 469,00 m\u00b2 alanl\u0131 arsa \u00fczerinde bulunan, 24\/240 arsa payl\u0131 1 nolu d\u00fckkan&#8217;\u0131n 1\/2 pay\u0131n\u0131n, 24\/240 arsa payl\u0131 2 nolu d\u00fckkan&#8217;\u0131n 1\/2 pay\u0131n\u0131n, 36\/240 arsa payl\u0131 7 nolu dairenin 1\/2 pay\u0131n\u0131n, 36\/240 arsa payl\u0131 8 nolu dairenin 1\/2 pay\u0131n\u0131n tapusunun iptali ile, davac\u0131 kurum ad\u0131na tapuya tesciline karar verilmi\u015f, h\u00fck\u00fcm daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Vasiyetnamenin tenfizi (yerine getirilmesi) davalar\u0131, Yarg\u0131tay Hukuk Genel Kurulu&#8217;nun 13.02.1991 g\u00fcn, 648-65 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi, bir ayni hakk\u0131n tesisi i\u00e7in de\u011fil, yaln\u0131zca Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesince a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131p okunan vasiyetnamenin TMK.nun 595 vd. (MK.nun 535. vd.) maddelerinde d\u00fczenlenen tebli\u011f i\u015flemlerinin tamamlanmas\u0131ndan ve gerekli yasal s\u00fcrelerin ge\u00e7mesinden sonra, herhangi bir itiraza u\u011framad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve iptalinin istenmedi\u011fi (istenmi\u015f ise reddedildi\u011fi) bu nedenle de kesinle\u015fmi\u015f oldu\u011funun tespiti i\u00e7indir.<\/p>\n<p>Di\u011fer bir anlat\u0131mla, vasiyetnamenin tenfizi, vasiyetnamenin a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131p itiraza u\u011framad\u0131\u011f\u0131 veya yap\u0131lan itirazlar\u0131n sonu\u00e7suz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespitinden ibarettir. Bu tespit ba\u015fl\u0131 ba\u015f\u0131na ayni bir hakk\u0131n ge\u00e7irimini sa\u011flamaz.<\/p>\n<p>Kendisine belirli bir mal vasiyet edilen ki\u015fi, TMK.nun 600.maddesi gere\u011fince, vasiyeti yerine getirmekle y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc olan varsa ona, yoksa yasal ve se\u00e7ilmi\u015f miras\u00e7\u0131lara kar\u015f\u0131 a\u00e7aca\u011f\u0131 istihkak davas\u0131 ile mal\u0131n kendisine teslimini isteyebilir.<\/p>\n<p>TMK.nun 514.(MK.nun 461.) maddesine g\u00f6re, mirasb\u0131rakan tasarruf \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131 i\u00e7inde malvarl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tamam\u0131nda veya bir k\u0131sm\u0131nda vasiyetname ile tasarrufta bulunabilir.<\/p>\n<p>Vasiyet genellikle ivas\u0131z bir tasarruftur. Vasiyet alacakl\u0131s\u0131, miras b\u0131rakan\u0131n k\u00fclli halefi olmay\u0131p, c\u00fcz&#8217;i halefi oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in vasiyet olunan mal \u00fczerinde do\u011frudan hak kazanmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. Vasiyet alacakl\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n alacak hakk\u0131n\u0131n hukuki sebebi olan vasiyet her ne kadar mirasb\u0131rakan\u0131n sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131nda yap\u0131l\u0131yorsa da, bu bir \u00f6l\u00fcme ba\u011fl\u0131 tasarruf oldu\u011fundan, vasiyet alaca\u011f\u0131 ancak mirasb\u0131rakan\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc ile do\u011far. Vasiyet alacakl\u0131s\u0131, kendisine vasiyet edilen \u015fey \u00fczerindeki m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131 ancak bu mal\u0131n vasiyetin yerine getirilmesi (tenfizi) yoluyla kendisi ad\u0131na tescili sonucunda kazan\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>Vasiyetnamenin tenfizi davas\u0131nda davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilebilmesi i\u00e7in vasiyetname konusunun terekeye dahil oldu\u011funun belirlenmesi gerekir ve dava sonucunda verilecek h\u00fck\u00fcm infazda kar\u0131\u015f\u0131kl\u0131k yaratmayacak a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131kta olmal\u0131d\u0131r. Elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyeti payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclmeden verilecek tenfiz karar\u0131n\u0131n infaz\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Bu halde, davac\u0131ya elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyeti payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcrmesi i\u00e7in yetki ve s\u00fcre verilmeli ve olu\u015facak sonu\u00e7 dairesinde karar verilmelidir.<\/p>\n<p>Somut olayda, mahkemece davac\u0131 ad\u0131na tapuya tesciline karar verilen ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n tapu kay\u0131tlar\u0131 incelendi\u011finde, 28.08.1996 tarih 3512 say\u0131l\u0131 i\u015flem ile 1\/2 pay\u0131n verasette i\u015ftirak olarak muris Recep S\u00f6nmez&#8217;in de dahil oldu\u011fu miras\u00e7\u0131lar ad\u0131na kay\u0131tl\u0131 oldu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p>Buna g\u00f6re, vasiyetnameye konu ta\u015f\u0131nmazlarda muris R&#8230; (vasiyet\u00e7i) elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyeti ile malik olup; elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyeti payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclmeden verilecek karar\u0131n infaz\u0131 da m\u00fcmk\u00fcn bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>Davac\u0131lar\u0131n yapmas\u0131 gereken Verasette i\u015ftirak olarak tapuda kay\u0131tl\u0131 olan davaya konu t\u00fcm ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n \u00f6ncelikle, muris Recep hisesi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclmesini sa\u011flamak, ondan sonra da vasiyetname gere\u011fince kendi adlar\u0131na tescilini talep etmektir.<\/p>\n<p>\u00d6yle ise, mahkemece; vasiyetnameye konu ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n Verasette i\u015ftirak halinde olan tapu kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n, muris Recep &#8216;\u0131n hisesi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden elbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclmesi i\u00e7in dava a\u00e7mak \u00fczere davac\u0131lara s\u00fcre verilmesi ve a\u00e7\u0131lacak davan\u0131n sonucunun beklenip, bundan sonra uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n esas\u0131 hakk\u0131nda var\u0131lacak sonu\u00e7 dairesinde bir h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 gerekirken; verasette i\u015ftirak halinde olan 1\/2 pay\u0131n tamam\u0131n\u0131n murise ait olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 halde eksik inceleme ve yan\u0131lg\u0131l\u0131 de\u011ferlendirme sonucu yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm tesisi do\u011fru g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f, bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Bozma nedenine g\u00f6re, di\u011fer temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesine \u015fimdilik gerek g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir .<\/p>\n<p>SONU\u00c7: Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan esaslar g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcnde tutulmaks\u0131z\u0131n yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm tesisi isabetsiz, temyiz itirazlar\u0131 bu nedenlerle yerinde oldu\u011fundan kabul\u00fc ile h\u00fckm\u00fcn HUMK.nun 428.maddesi gere\u011fince BOZULMASINA ve pe\u015fin al\u0131nan temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131n istek halinde temyiz edene iadesine, 23.12.2015 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p>\u200bElbirli\u011fi m\u00fclkiyetinin payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclmesi ya t\u00fcm miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131n kat\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 bir s\u00f6zle\u015fme ile tapu sicil m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u00f6n\u00fcnde veya bir miras\u00e7\u0131n\u0131n di\u011fer miras\u00e7\u0131lar aleyhine a\u00e7aca\u011f\u0131 dava sonucu ve herhalde kanundaki \u015fartlar\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi halinde h\u00e2kim h\u00fckm\u00fc ile m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr.\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n<p>Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 7. Hukuk Dairesi 2022\/6973 E., 2024\/160 K. &#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221; MAHKEMES\u0130 : Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi SAYISI : 2008\/13 E., 2008\/130 K. KARAR : Davan\u0131n reddi Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki sat\u0131\u015f vaadi s\u00f6zle\u015fmesine dayal\u0131 tapu iptali ve tescil istemine ili\u015fkin yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonucunda; davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Mahkeme karar\u0131 davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmekle; kesinlik, s\u00fcre, temyiz \u015fart\u0131 ve di\u011fer usul eksiklikleri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yap\u0131lan \u00f6n inceleme sonucunda, temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin kabul\u00fcne karar verildikten ve Tetkik H\u00e2kimi taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan rapor dinlendikten sonra dosyadaki belgeler incelenip gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: I. DAVA Davac\u0131 dava dilek\u00e7esinde, daval\u0131n\u0131n, murisi &#8230; &#8216;den intikal eden dava konusu 67 ada 8 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaz \u00fczerindeki t\u00fcm hak ve hissesini noterde d\u00fczenlenen 02.09.2002 tarihli ta\u015f\u0131nmaz sat\u0131\u015f vaadi s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi ile &#8230;&#8217;e satmay\u0131 vaad etti\u011fini, kendisinin de Tarsus 1. Noterli\u011finin 04.10.2007 tarih ve 6699 yevmiye No.lu sat\u0131\u015f vaadi devir temlik s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi ile sat\u0131\u015f\u0131 vaad edilen hisseyi Galip \u015eahin\u2019den temlik ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek, dava konusu ta\u015f\u0131nmazda daval\u0131ya d\u00fc\u015fecek hissenin kendi ad\u0131na tesciline karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir. II. CEVAP Daval\u0131 24.03.2008 tarihli celsedeki beyan\u0131nda, kendi ad\u0131na kay\u0131tl\u0131 olan hissenin davac\u0131 ad\u0131na devrini kabul etti\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir. III. MAHKEME KARARI Mahkemenin yukar\u0131da tarih ve say\u0131s\u0131 belirtilen karar\u0131 ile, kay\u0131t sahibinin miras\u00e7\u0131s\u0131 oldu\u011fu iddia edilen &#8230;\u2019den ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131 sat\u0131\u015f vaadi s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi ile &hellip;<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-131259","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.6 (Yoast SEO v27.1.1) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>ELB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130 M\u00dcLK\u0130YET\u0130N\u0130N PAYLI M\u00dcLK\u0130YETE D\u00d6N\u00dc\u015eT\u00dcR\u00dcLMES\u0130 DAVALARINA \u0130L\u0130\u015eK\u0130N YARGITAY KARARLARI - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/elbirligi-mulkiyetinin-payli-mulkiyete-donusturulmesi-davalarina-iliskin-yargitay-kararlari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"uk_UA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"ELB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130 M\u00dcLK\u0130YET\u0130N\u0130N PAYLI M\u00dcLK\u0130YETE D\u00d6N\u00dc\u015eT\u00dcR\u00dcLMES\u0130 DAVALARINA \u0130L\u0130\u015eK\u0130N YARGITAY KARARLARI\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 7. Hukuk Dairesi 2022\/6973 E., 2024\/160 K. &#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221; MAHKEMES\u0130 : Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi SAYISI : 2008\/13 E., 2008\/130 K. KARAR : Davan\u0131n reddi Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki sat\u0131\u015f vaadi s\u00f6zle\u015fmesine dayal\u0131 tapu iptali ve tescil istemine ili\u015fkin yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonucunda; davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Mahkeme karar\u0131 davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmekle; kesinlik, s\u00fcre, temyiz \u015fart\u0131 ve di\u011fer usul eksiklikleri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yap\u0131lan \u00f6n inceleme sonucunda, temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin kabul\u00fcne karar verildikten ve Tetkik H\u00e2kimi taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan rapor dinlendikten sonra dosyadaki belgeler incelenip gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: I. DAVA Davac\u0131 dava dilek\u00e7esinde, daval\u0131n\u0131n, murisi &#8230; &#8216;den intikal eden dava konusu 67 ada 8 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaz \u00fczerindeki t\u00fcm hak ve hissesini noterde d\u00fczenlenen 02.09.2002 tarihli ta\u015f\u0131nmaz sat\u0131\u015f vaadi s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi ile &#8230;&#8217;e satmay\u0131 vaad etti\u011fini, kendisinin de Tarsus 1. Noterli\u011finin 04.10.2007 tarih ve 6699 yevmiye No.lu sat\u0131\u015f vaadi devir temlik s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi ile sat\u0131\u015f\u0131 vaad edilen hisseyi Galip \u015eahin\u2019den temlik ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek, dava konusu ta\u015f\u0131nmazda daval\u0131ya d\u00fc\u015fecek hissenin kendi ad\u0131na tesciline karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir. II. CEVAP Daval\u0131 24.03.2008 tarihli celsedeki beyan\u0131nda, kendi ad\u0131na kay\u0131tl\u0131 olan hissenin davac\u0131 ad\u0131na devrini kabul etti\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir. III. MAHKEME KARARI Mahkemenin yukar\u0131da tarih ve say\u0131s\u0131 belirtilen karar\u0131 ile, kay\u0131t sahibinin miras\u00e7\u0131s\u0131 oldu\u011fu iddia edilen &#8230;\u2019den ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131 sat\u0131\u015f vaadi s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi ile &hellip;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/elbirligi-mulkiyetinin-payli-mulkiyete-donusturulmesi-davalarina-iliskin-yargitay-kararlari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-06-30T07:35:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u043e\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u0431\u043b. \u0447\u0430\u0441 \u0447\u0438\u0442\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"41 \u0445\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0438\u043d\u0430\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/elbirligi-mulkiyetinin-payli-mulkiyete-donusturulmesi-davalarina-iliskin-yargitay-kararlari\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/elbirligi-mulkiyetinin-payli-mulkiyete-donusturulmesi-davalarina-iliskin-yargitay-kararlari\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\"},\"headline\":\"ELB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130 M\u00dcLK\u0130YET\u0130N\u0130N PAYLI M\u00dcLK\u0130YETE D\u00d6N\u00dc\u015eT\u00dcR\u00dcLMES\u0130 DAVALARINA \u0130L\u0130\u015eK\u0130N YARGITAY KARARLARI\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-06-30T07:35:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/elbirligi-mulkiyetinin-payli-mulkiyete-donusturulmesi-davalarina-iliskin-yargitay-kararlari\/\"},\"wordCount\":8278,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Hukuki Haberler\"],\"inLanguage\":\"uk\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/elbirligi-mulkiyetinin-payli-mulkiyete-donusturulmesi-davalarina-iliskin-yargitay-kararlari\/\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/elbirligi-mulkiyetinin-payli-mulkiyete-donusturulmesi-davalarina-iliskin-yargitay-kararlari\/\",\"name\":\"ELB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130 M\u00dcLK\u0130YET\u0130N\u0130N PAYLI M\u00dcLK\u0130YETE D\u00d6N\u00dc\u015eT\u00dcR\u00dcLMES\u0130 DAVALARINA \u0130L\u0130\u015eK\u0130N YARGITAY KARARLARI - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2025-06-30T07:35:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/elbirligi-mulkiyetinin-payli-mulkiyete-donusturulmesi-davalarina-iliskin-yargitay-kararlari\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"uk\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/elbirligi-mulkiyetinin-payli-mulkiyete-donusturulmesi-davalarina-iliskin-yargitay-kararlari\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/elbirligi-mulkiyetinin-payli-mulkiyete-donusturulmesi-davalarina-iliskin-yargitay-kararlari\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"ELB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130 M\u00dcLK\u0130YET\u0130N\u0130N PAYLI M\u00dcLK\u0130YETE D\u00d6N\u00dc\u015eT\u00dcR\u00dcLMES\u0130 DAVALARINA \u0130L\u0130\u015eK\u0130N YARGITAY KARARLARI\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"description\":\"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"uk\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"uk\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"width\":1080,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\",\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"uk\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net\"],\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/author\/hukukihabernet\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"ELB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130 M\u00dcLK\u0130YET\u0130N\u0130N PAYLI M\u00dcLK\u0130YETE D\u00d6N\u00dc\u015eT\u00dcR\u00dcLMES\u0130 DAVALARINA \u0130L\u0130\u015eK\u0130N YARGITAY KARARLARI - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/elbirligi-mulkiyetinin-payli-mulkiyete-donusturulmesi-davalarina-iliskin-yargitay-kararlari\/","og_locale":"uk_UA","og_type":"article","og_title":"ELB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130 M\u00dcLK\u0130YET\u0130N\u0130N PAYLI M\u00dcLK\u0130YETE D\u00d6N\u00dc\u015eT\u00dcR\u00dcLMES\u0130 DAVALARINA \u0130L\u0130\u015eK\u0130N YARGITAY KARARLARI","og_description":"T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 7. Hukuk Dairesi 2022\/6973 E., 2024\/160 K. &#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221; MAHKEMES\u0130 : Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi SAYISI : 2008\/13 E., 2008\/130 K. KARAR : Davan\u0131n reddi Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki sat\u0131\u015f vaadi s\u00f6zle\u015fmesine dayal\u0131 tapu iptali ve tescil istemine ili\u015fkin yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonucunda; davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Mahkeme karar\u0131 davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmekle; kesinlik, s\u00fcre, temyiz \u015fart\u0131 ve di\u011fer usul eksiklikleri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yap\u0131lan \u00f6n inceleme sonucunda, temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin kabul\u00fcne karar verildikten ve Tetkik H\u00e2kimi taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan rapor dinlendikten sonra dosyadaki belgeler incelenip gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: I. DAVA Davac\u0131 dava dilek\u00e7esinde, daval\u0131n\u0131n, murisi &#8230; &#8216;den intikal eden dava konusu 67 ada 8 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaz \u00fczerindeki t\u00fcm hak ve hissesini noterde d\u00fczenlenen 02.09.2002 tarihli ta\u015f\u0131nmaz sat\u0131\u015f vaadi s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi ile &#8230;&#8217;e satmay\u0131 vaad etti\u011fini, kendisinin de Tarsus 1. Noterli\u011finin 04.10.2007 tarih ve 6699 yevmiye No.lu sat\u0131\u015f vaadi devir temlik s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi ile sat\u0131\u015f\u0131 vaad edilen hisseyi Galip \u015eahin\u2019den temlik ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek, dava konusu ta\u015f\u0131nmazda daval\u0131ya d\u00fc\u015fecek hissenin kendi ad\u0131na tesciline karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir. II. CEVAP Daval\u0131 24.03.2008 tarihli celsedeki beyan\u0131nda, kendi ad\u0131na kay\u0131tl\u0131 olan hissenin davac\u0131 ad\u0131na devrini kabul etti\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir. III. MAHKEME KARARI Mahkemenin yukar\u0131da tarih ve say\u0131s\u0131 belirtilen karar\u0131 ile, kay\u0131t sahibinin miras\u00e7\u0131s\u0131 oldu\u011fu iddia edilen &#8230;\u2019den ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131 sat\u0131\u015f vaadi s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi ile &hellip;","og_url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/elbirligi-mulkiyetinin-payli-mulkiyete-donusturulmesi-davalarina-iliskin-yargitay-kararlari\/","og_site_name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","article_published_time":"2025-06-30T07:35:00+00:00","author":"Hukuki Haber.net","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u043e":"Hukuki Haber.net","\u041f\u0440\u0438\u0431\u043b. \u0447\u0430\u0441 \u0447\u0438\u0442\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044f":"41 \u0445\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0438\u043d\u0430"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/elbirligi-mulkiyetinin-payli-mulkiyete-donusturulmesi-davalarina-iliskin-yargitay-kararlari\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/elbirligi-mulkiyetinin-payli-mulkiyete-donusturulmesi-davalarina-iliskin-yargitay-kararlari\/"},"author":{"name":"Hukuki Haber.net","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822"},"headline":"ELB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130 M\u00dcLK\u0130YET\u0130N\u0130N PAYLI M\u00dcLK\u0130YETE D\u00d6N\u00dc\u015eT\u00dcR\u00dcLMES\u0130 DAVALARINA \u0130L\u0130\u015eK\u0130N YARGITAY KARARLARI","datePublished":"2025-06-30T07:35:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/elbirligi-mulkiyetinin-payli-mulkiyete-donusturulmesi-davalarina-iliskin-yargitay-kararlari\/"},"wordCount":8278,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Hukuki Haberler"],"inLanguage":"uk"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/elbirligi-mulkiyetinin-payli-mulkiyete-donusturulmesi-davalarina-iliskin-yargitay-kararlari\/","url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/elbirligi-mulkiyetinin-payli-mulkiyete-donusturulmesi-davalarina-iliskin-yargitay-kararlari\/","name":"ELB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130 M\u00dcLK\u0130YET\u0130N\u0130N PAYLI M\u00dcLK\u0130YETE D\u00d6N\u00dc\u015eT\u00dcR\u00dcLMES\u0130 DAVALARINA \u0130L\u0130\u015eK\u0130N YARGITAY KARARLARI - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-06-30T07:35:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/elbirligi-mulkiyetinin-payli-mulkiyete-donusturulmesi-davalarina-iliskin-yargitay-kararlari\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"uk","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/elbirligi-mulkiyetinin-payli-mulkiyete-donusturulmesi-davalarina-iliskin-yargitay-kararlari\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/elbirligi-mulkiyetinin-payli-mulkiyete-donusturulmesi-davalarina-iliskin-yargitay-kararlari\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"ELB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130 M\u00dcLK\u0130YET\u0130N\u0130N PAYLI M\u00dcLK\u0130YETE D\u00d6N\u00dc\u015eT\u00dcR\u00dcLMES\u0130 DAVALARINA \u0130L\u0130\u015eK\u0130N YARGITAY KARARLARI"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","description":"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"uk"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"uk","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","contentUrl":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","width":1080,"height":1080,"caption":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822","name":"Hukuki Haber.net","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"uk","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Hukuki Haber.net"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net"],"url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/author\/hukukihabernet\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/131259","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=131259"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/131259\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=131259"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=131259"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=131259"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}