Gazeteci Fatih Altayl\u0131’n\u0131n bir televizyon program\u0131nda yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamalar nedeniyle T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu’nun 310. maddesi kapsam\u0131nda “Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131na tehdit” iddias\u0131yla ba\u015flat\u0131lan soru\u015fturma sonucu g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131na Antalya Barosu’ndan tepki geldi. Baro taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan yaz\u0131l\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamada, g\u00f6zalt\u0131 i\u015flemi “hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131” ve “ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne a\u011f\u0131r bir m\u00fcdahale” olarak nitelendirdi.<\/p>\n
“SUYUN ISINDI” PAYLA\u015eIMI VE S\u0130YAS\u0130 ETK\u0130 VURGUSU <\/p>\n
Baro a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131nda, Altayl\u0131’n\u0131n g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131n, Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131 Ba\u015fdan\u0131\u015fman\u0131 Oktay Saral’\u0131n sosyal medyadaki “Suyun \u0131s\u0131nd\u0131 Fatih” payla\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n hemen ard\u0131ndan gelmesinin, yarg\u0131ya y\u00f6nelik siyasi m\u00fcdahalenin a\u00e7\u0131k bir g\u00f6stergesi oldu\u011funu savundu. A\u00e7\u0131klamada, “Yarg\u0131 s\u00fcre\u00e7lerinin siyasi s\u00f6ylemlerle nas\u0131l \u015fekillendi\u011finin bir tezah\u00fcr\u00fcd\u00fcr” denildi.<\/p>\n
“YAKALAMA VE G\u00d6ZALTI HUKUKA AYKIRI” <\/p>\n
Kimli\u011fi kamuoyunca bilinen bir gazeteciye, Ceza Mahkemesi Kanunu’nun 98. maddesi gere\u011fince ‘\u00e7a\u011fr\u0131 usul\u00fc’ uygulanmaks\u0131z\u0131n do\u011frudan yakalama ve g\u00f6zalt\u0131 i\u015flemi yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu vurgulad\u0131. A\u00e7\u0131klamada, “Usul h\u00fck\u00fcmleri ihlal edilerek yap\u0131lan bu i\u015flem hukuk devleti ilkesiyle ba\u011fda\u015famaz” ifadelerine yer verildi.<\/p>\n
\u0130FADE \u00d6ZG\u00dcRL\u00dc\u011e\u00dc VURGUSU<\/p>\n
Antalya Barosu, a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131nda Anayasa’n\u0131n 26. ve Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi’nin 10.maddelerinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne dikkat \u00e7ekti. Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesi ve Anayasa Mahkemesi kararlar\u0131ndan \u00f6rneklerle desteklenen a\u00e7\u0131klamada, “Siyaset\u00e7iler, bas\u0131n\u0131n denetimine a\u00e7\u0131k olmay\u0131 bilerek tercih eder ve daha geni\u015f ho\u015fg\u00f6r\u00fc g\u00f6stermek durumundad\u0131r” g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc savundu.<\/p>\n
“KIYAS YOLUYLA SU\u00c7 YARATILAMAZ”<\/p>\n
Baro, gazeteci Altayl\u0131’n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131n\u0131n do\u011frudan tehdit i\u00e7ermedi\u011fini belirterek, TCK’n\u0131n 310\/2. maddesi kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirilmesinin, TCK m.2’de yer alan k\u0131yas yasa\u011f\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu ifade etti. A\u00e7\u0131klamada, “Bir ifadenin siyasi iktidar\u0131 rahats\u0131z etmesi, onun su\u00e7 say\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirmez” denildi.<\/p>\n
YARGIYA SOSYAL MEDYA BASKISI ELE\u015eT\u0130R\u0130S\u0130<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131n\u0131n ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z hareket etmesi gerekti\u011fi hat\u0131rlat\u0131lan a\u00e7\u0131klamada, y\u00fcksek b\u00fcrokratlar\u0131n sosyal medya payla\u015f\u0131mlar\u0131yla yarg\u0131 s\u00fcre\u00e7lerinin y\u00f6nlendirilmesinin kabul edilemez oldu\u011fu ifade edildi. Antalya Barosu, a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131n\u0131n sonunda, gazetecilik faaliyeti kapsam\u0131nda yap\u0131lan yorumlar\u0131n cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n, demokratik hukuk devletine zarar verdi\u011fini belirtti.<\/p>\n
\u200bGazeteci Fatih Altayl\u0131’n\u0131n “Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131na tehdit” iddias\u0131yla tutuklanmas\u0131na sert tepki g\u00f6steren Antalya Barosu, \u2018hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131\u2019 buldu\u011fu tutuklama karar\u0131n\u0131 bas\u0131n \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne a\u011f\u0131r bir m\u00fcdahale olarak de\u011ferlendirdi.\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u200bHaberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.antalyakorfez.com<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Gazeteci Fatih Altayl\u0131’n\u0131n bir televizyon program\u0131nda yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamalar nedeniyle T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu’nun 310. maddesi kapsam\u0131nda “Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131na tehdit” iddias\u0131yla ba\u015flat\u0131lan soru\u015fturma sonucu g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131na Antalya Barosu’ndan tepki geldi. Baro taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan yaz\u0131l\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamada, g\u00f6zalt\u0131 i\u015flemi “hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131” ve “ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne a\u011f\u0131r bir m\u00fcdahale” olarak nitelendirdi. “SUYUN ISINDI” PAYLA\u015eIMI VE S\u0130YAS\u0130 ETK\u0130 VURGUSU Baro a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131nda, Altayl\u0131’n\u0131n g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131n, Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131 Ba\u015fdan\u0131\u015fman\u0131 Oktay Saral’\u0131n sosyal medyadaki “Suyun \u0131s\u0131nd\u0131 Fatih” payla\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n hemen ard\u0131ndan gelmesinin, yarg\u0131ya y\u00f6nelik siyasi m\u00fcdahalenin a\u00e7\u0131k bir g\u00f6stergesi oldu\u011funu savundu. A\u00e7\u0131klamada, “Yarg\u0131 s\u00fcre\u00e7lerinin siyasi s\u00f6ylemlerle nas\u0131l \u015fekillendi\u011finin bir tezah\u00fcr\u00fcd\u00fcr” denildi. “YAKALAMA VE G\u00d6ZALTI HUKUKA AYKIRI” Kimli\u011fi kamuoyunca bilinen bir gazeteciye, Ceza Mahkemesi Kanunu’nun 98. maddesi gere\u011fince ‘\u00e7a\u011fr\u0131 usul\u00fc’ uygulanmaks\u0131z\u0131n do\u011frudan yakalama ve g\u00f6zalt\u0131 i\u015flemi yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu vurgulad\u0131. A\u00e7\u0131klamada, “Usul h\u00fck\u00fcmleri ihlal edilerek yap\u0131lan bu i\u015flem hukuk devleti ilkesiyle ba\u011fda\u015famaz” ifadelerine yer verildi. \u0130FADE \u00d6ZG\u00dcRL\u00dc\u011e\u00dc VURGUSU Antalya Barosu, a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131nda Anayasa’n\u0131n 26. ve Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi’nin 10.maddelerinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne dikkat \u00e7ekti. Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesi ve Anayasa Mahkemesi kararlar\u0131ndan \u00f6rneklerle desteklenen a\u00e7\u0131klamada, “Siyaset\u00e7iler, bas\u0131n\u0131n denetimine a\u00e7\u0131k olmay\u0131 bilerek tercih eder ve daha geni\u015f ho\u015fg\u00f6r\u00fc g\u00f6stermek durumundad\u0131r” g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc savundu. “KIYAS YOLUYLA SU\u00c7 YARATILAMAZ” Baro, gazeteci Altayl\u0131’n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131n\u0131n do\u011frudan tehdit i\u00e7ermedi\u011fini belirterek, TCK’n\u0131n 310\/2. maddesi kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirilmesinin, TCK m.2’de yer …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[24],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-123541","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-gundem"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n