T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
SERDAR AKSOY BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/29035)<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 29\/4\/2025<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Recai AKYEL<\/p>\n
Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n
Selahaddin MENTE\u015e<\/p>\n
Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Ayd\u0131n DEM\u0130REL<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Serdar AKSOY<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Mesut YILDIZ<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru; tutuklama tedbirinin hukuki olmamas\u0131, tutukluluk incelemelerinin h\u00e2kim\/mahkeme \u00f6n\u00fcne \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n yap\u0131lmas\u0131 ve tutuklulu\u011fun makul s\u00fcreyi a\u015fmas\u0131 nedeniyle ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucu, Menemen il\u00e7e belediye ba\u015fkan\u0131 olarak g\u00f6rev yapmakta iken Menemen Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) taraf\u0131ndan zimmet su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011fi isnad\u0131yla ba\u015flat\u0131lan soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda 20\/11\/2020 tarihinde g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucu ve di\u011fer \u015f\u00fcphelilerin zimmet su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde kuvvetli su\u00e7 \u015f\u00fcphesinin ve tutuklama nedenlerinin bulundu\u011fu belirtilerek tutuklama talebinde bulunulmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fvurucu ve baz\u0131 \u015f\u00fcpheliler 23\/11\/2020 tarihinde sevk edildikleri Menemen Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fi (H\u00e2kimlik) taraf\u0131ndan 24\/11\/2020 tarihinde m\u00fcsnet su\u00e7tan tutuklanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Tutuklama karar\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7esi \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“…\u015e\u00fcpheli Serdar Aksoy’un \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 zimmet su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011fine dair kuvvetli su\u00e7 \u015f\u00fcphesinin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6sterir olgular\u0131 bulunmas\u0131, (bu somut olgulardan Kanun Y\u00f6netmelik ve Genelge uyar\u0131nca Menemen Belediyesine ait hurda e\u015fyalar\u0131n ancak MKE ye devrinin yap\u0131labilece\u011fi, bunun d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda 3. \u015fah\u0131slara sat\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n s\u00f6z konusu olmayaca\u011f\u0131, Kanunu bilmeme durumunun mazeret say\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131, \u015f\u00fcpheli her ne kadar savunmas\u0131nda t\u00fcm su\u00e7lamalar\u0131 reddetti\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f ise de; \u015f\u00fcphelinin Menemen Belediye Ba\u015fkan\u0131 olarak g\u00f6rev yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131, g\u00f6revi icab\u0131nca Belediyenin t\u00fcm mal varl\u0131klar\u0131ndan sorumlu olaca\u011f\u0131, y\u00f6netiminin ve de\u011ferlendirilmesinin yasa gere\u011fi kendisine b\u0131rak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, eylem tarihinin ilk g\u00fcn\u00fc olan 21\/02\/2020 tarihinde \u015fantiye amiri olarak g\u00f6rev yapan [K.Y.nin] kendisiyle watsaptan yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesinde a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a durumu \u015f\u00fcpheli Serdar Aksoy’a bildirdi\u011fini beyan etmesine kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k \u015f\u00fcpheli Serdar Aksoy’un bu beyana cevap olarak oraya gelen arkada\u015flar \u0130zmir B\u00fcy\u00fck\u015fehir Belediyesinin de anla\u015fm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu hurda firmas\u0131 \u0130zmir’deki CHP \u0130l\u00e7e Belediyelerinde bulunan hurdalar\u0131 bunlar al\u0131yorlar. Konu ile ilgili bir s\u0131k\u0131nt\u0131 yok. Arkada\u015flar neyi alacaklar\u0131n\u0131 biliyorlar. Bilgim dahilinde \u015feklinde yan\u0131t verdi\u011fi, bu \u015fekilde i\u015flenen su\u00e7a onay verdi\u011fi, aralar\u0131nda herhangi bir husumet bulunmamas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k bu duruma izahat getiremedi\u011fi, [G.Y.] isimli ki\u015finin savunmalar\u0131nda [T.T.] ile Belediye ba\u015fkan\u0131n\u0131n konu hakk\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcklerine \u015fahit oldu\u011funu beyan etti\u011fi, olay\u0131n k\u0131sa bir s\u00fcre i\u00e7erisinde bas\u0131nda ve kamuoyunda haber konusu yap\u0131lmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen bu durumla alakal\u0131 derhal bir soru\u015fturma yapmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi adli mercilere de haber vermedi\u011fi, durumdan vak\u0131f oldu\u011funun a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belli oldu\u011fu kald\u0131 ki; kendine ait \u015fahsi arac\u0131 olan 35 …9 plaka say\u0131l\u0131 arac\u0131n 21\/02\/2020 tarihinde olay yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclenmesine kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k bu duruma da izahat getiremedi\u011fi, olay\u0131 organize eden ve zimmeti \u00f6rtbas s\u00fcrecinde yer alan [T.] ve [G.] isimli ki\u015filer ile de yak\u0131n ili\u015fkiler i\u00e7inde oldu\u011fu,[T.] isimli ki\u015finin \u015f\u00fcphelinin e\u015fi olan [D.Y.A.ya] ait \u015fahsi kredi kart\u0131 borcunu \u00f6dedi\u011finin banka hesap hareketleri ile a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a tespit edildi\u011fi, ayr\u0131ca [T.] ve [G.] isimli ki\u015filer ile birlikte hareket eden [M.\u00c7.] isimli ki\u015finin ise \u015f\u00fcpheli Serdar Aksoy’un [M.E.] isimli ki\u015fiye ait \u015fahsi borcunu \u00f6dedi\u011fi, buna dair savunmas\u0131n\u0131n dosya kapsam\u0131 ile \u00e7eli\u015fir vaziyette oldu\u011fu, ayr\u0131ca \u015f\u00fcphelinin \u015eubat ay\u0131nda ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen olayla alakal\u0131 \u00f6ncelikle ge\u00e7mi\u015f tarihli olarak tan\u0131k olarak ifadesine ba\u015fvurulan [M.\u00c7.] isimli ki\u015fiyi soru\u015fturmac\u0131 olarak g\u00f6revlendirdi\u011fi, daha sonra zimmetin ortaya \u00e7\u0131kaca\u011f\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclerek g\u00f6revine son verildi\u011fi, bunun yan\u0131 s\u0131ra [G.U.] isimli ki\u015fi vas\u0131tas\u0131yla kamu zarar\u0131 \u00f6dettirilen [S.] isimli \u015firketin eylem tarihleri itibariyle faal vaziyette olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 halde, kamu zarar\u0131n\u0131n giderilmesi yoluna gidildi\u011fi, bu \u015fekilde zimmetin \u015f\u00fcpheli ve y\u00f6netim ekibi ile birlikte zimmetin \u00f6rtbas edilmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde \u015f\u00fcpheli Serdar aksoy taraf\u0131ndan mobing uygulanmak suretiyle [T.T.], [N.] ve [K.] isimli ki\u015filere tutanaklar tanzim ettirdi\u011fi, bu a\u015famada \u015f\u00fcpheli eyleminin dosyada yer alan somut deliller ile ve \u015f\u00fcphelinin kamu g\u00f6revlisi olmas\u0131 nedeniyle tamamlanm\u0131\u015f zimmet su\u00e7una i\u015ftirak etmi\u015f oldu\u011funun sabit oldu\u011fu, as\u0131l temel cezan\u0131n 5 y\u0131ldan 12 y\u0131la kadar hapis cezas\u0131 olacak \u015fekilde d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi, \u015f\u00fcphelinin eylemlerinin kamera g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcleri, tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131 ile sabit oldu\u011fu, bu eylemin neticesinde ilgili \u015f\u00fcphelilerde a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere zimmetten faydalanma durumunun a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a tespit edildi\u011fi, meydana gelen eylemin a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131, zimmete ge\u00e7irilen hurdalar\u0131n niteli\u011fi ve miktar\u0131 bir arada de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde \u015f\u00fcphelinin serbest kalmas\u0131 halinde bu durumun ceza adaleti ile ba\u011fda\u015fmayaca\u011f\u0131, isnat edilen eylemin cezas\u0131n\u0131n yasada \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen alt ve \u00fcst s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131, delillerin tam olarak toplanmam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 nedeni ile de\u011fi\u015ftirilme\/karart\u0131lma \u015f\u00fcphesinin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131, isnat edilen eylemin ve yasada \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen orant\u0131l\u0131l\u0131k ilkesi dikkate al\u0131narak adli kontrol tedbirlerinin yetersiz kalaca\u011f\u0131…”<\/p>\n
4. Ba\u015fvurucunun tutuklama karar\u0131na yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz Kar\u015f\u0131yaka 1. Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011finin 2\/12\/2020 tarihli karar\u0131yla tutuklama karar\u0131nda isabetsizlik bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve tutuklama gerek\u00e7elerinin devam etti\u011fi belirtilerek reddedilmi\u015ftir. Soru\u015fturma s\u00fcresince ba\u015fvurucunun serbest b\u0131rak\u0131lma talepleri ve tutukluluk h\u00e2linin devam\u0131na itirazlar\u0131; zimmet su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011fine dair kuvvetli su\u00e7 \u015f\u00fcphesi bulundu\u011funa dair delillerin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131, isnat edilen su\u00e7 i\u00e7in kanunda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen cezan\u0131n alt ve \u00fcst s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131, delillerin tam olarak toplanmam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 nedeniyle de\u011fi\u015ftirilme\/karart\u0131lma \u015f\u00fcphesinin bulunmas\u0131, tutuklama nedenlerinde herhangi bir de\u011fi\u015fiklik olmamas\u0131, adli kontrol tedbirinin yetersiz kalaca\u011f\u0131, tutuklama tedbirinin bu a\u015famada \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fc oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7eleriyle reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n g\u00f6nderdi\u011fi fezleke sonras\u0131nda Kar\u015f\u0131yaka Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucu ve di\u011fer 23 \u015f\u00fcpheli hakk\u0131nda 9\/3\/2021 tarihinde kamu davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u0130ddianamede, ba\u015fvurucunun zimmet su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011fi ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. \u0130ddianamenin ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“…Kamu Kurum ve kurulu\u015flar\u0131n, Mahalli \u0130darelerin ve askeri birliklerin sahip oldu\u011fu hurda nitekli malzemelerini Bilim Sanayi ve Teknoloji Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan her alt\u0131 ayda bir belirlenen fiyat \u00fczerinden, Makine ve Kimya End\u00fcstrisi Kurumu MKE Hurda \u0130\u015fletmesi M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne sat\u0131\u015f suretiyle devretmek zorunda olmalar\u0131na ra\u011fmen Menemen Belediyesinin bu pros\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc izlemeyip Menemen Belediyesine ait Koyundere \u015eantiyesinde bulunan Menemen Belediyesine ait hurdalar\u0131n belediye g\u00f6revlileri taraf\u0131ndan usuls\u00fcz olarak sat\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair ihbar ve \u015fikayet \u00fczerine yap\u0131lan soru\u015fturmada; <\/p>\n
MKE Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn 30\/07\/2021 tarihli yaz\u0131s\u0131nda Menemen Belediyesince2020 y\u0131l\u0131nda hurda malzeme teslimi yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirtildi\u011fi, <\/p>\n
…<\/p>\n
\u015e\u00fcphelilerden Serdar AKSOY’un \u015f\u00fcpheli [T.F.\u00c7]’\u0131 tan\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131,… Menemen Belediyesine ait Koyundere mevkisinde bulunan belediyeye ait hurdalar konusunda Menemen Belediyesi Sat\u0131nalma Birimi Sorumlusu [T.T.]’n\u0131n \u015f\u00fcpheli [O.Y.] ile g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, \u015f\u00fcpheli [O.Y.] ‘\u0131n bu konuyu \u015f\u00fcpheli [T.F.\u00c7]’ a s\u00f6ylemesiyle her iki \u015f\u00fcphelinin hurdalar\u0131n sat\u0131\u015f\u0131 konusunda g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015ft\u00fckleri, \u015f\u00fcpheli [O.Y.] ‘\u0131n da bu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeden sonra olay tarihinden yakla\u015f\u0131k 10-15 g\u00fcn \u00f6nce ge\u00e7imini serbest olarak hurda metal geri d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f\u00fcm al\u0131m sat\u0131m i\u015fi yaparak yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 arac\u0131l\u0131k ile kar sa\u011flayan \u015f\u00fcpheli [G.Y.] ve serbest olarak hurda metal al\u0131m sat\u0131m i\u015fi yapan \u015f\u00fcpheli [F.K.] ile irtibata ge\u00e7erek Menemen Belediyesine ait hurdalar\u0131 kendilerine verebileceklerini s\u00f6ylemesi \u00fczerine, birbirlerini tan\u0131yan ve birlikte i\u015f yapan \u015f\u00fcpheliler [G.Y.] ve \u015f\u00fcpheli [F.K.]’un bu konuyu aralar\u0131nda konu\u015ftuklar\u0131 ve hurda i\u015fi i\u00e7in g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeye karar verdikleri,… \u015f\u00fcpheli[O.Y.]’\u0131n belediye hurdalar\u0131n\u0131n sat\u0131laca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve kendisine bu i\u015fi yapacak ki\u015filerle onlar\u0131 tan\u0131\u015ft\u0131raca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi\u011fi, restaurantta \u015f\u00fcpheli [T.F.\u00c7.]’\u0131n geldi\u011fi \u015f\u00fcpheli[O.Y.]’\u0131n, \u015f\u00fcpheli [T.]\u0131 belediyeci olarak tan\u0131\u015ft\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131,… Menemen Belediyesine ait Koyundere mevkisinde bulunan belediyeye ait hurdalar\u0131n sat\u0131\u015f\u0131 konusunu konu\u015ftuklar\u0131, \u015f\u00fcpheliler [T.F.\u00c7.] ve [O.Y.] ‘\u0131n \u015f\u00fcpheliler [G.Y.] ve[F.K.] ile anla\u015fmaya vard\u0131klar\u0131, … Menemen Belediyesi \u015fantiyesinde yakla\u015f\u0131k 150-200 ton tutar\u0131nda hurdalar\u0131n sat\u0131\u015f\u0131na ili\u015fkin \u015f\u00fcpheli [F.K.] ile [G.Y.]’\u0131n al\u0131c\u0131 olduklar\u0131n\u0131 belirterek al\u0131nacak hurdalar i\u00e7in fiyat teklifinde bulunduklar\u0131, belediye g\u00f6revlileri olan \u015f\u00fcpheliler [G.K.] ve [T.T.]’n\u0131n \u015f\u00fcpheliler [F.K.] ve [G.Y.]’\u0131n verdi\u011fi teklifi kabul ederek hurda sat\u0131\u015f i\u015finin ihaleye \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, Ba\u015fkanl\u0131k Makam\u0131 oluru ile do\u011frudan temin yoluyla yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledikleri, yapt\u0131klar\u0131 anla\u015fma gere\u011fince \u015f\u00fcpheli [T.T.]’n\u0131n nakit olarak 50.000-100.000 TL para istedi\u011fi, \u015f\u00fcpheliler [T.T.] ve [G.K.]’ un paran\u0131n \u00f6denmesi konusunda \u0131srarc\u0131 olduklar\u0131 ve paran\u0131n acil olarak \u00f6denmesi gerekti\u011fini ve ba\u015fkan\u0131n bekledi\u011fini s\u00f6yledikleri, \u015f\u00fcpheli [G.Y.]’\u0131n nakit para vermek yerine \u015f\u00fcpheli [T.T.]’dan hesap numaras\u0131 istedi\u011fi, \u015f\u00fcpheli [T.T.]’n\u0131n Menemen Belediyesi \u015firketi olan [M.] \u015eirketinin hesap numaras\u0131n\u0131 \u015f\u00fcpheli [F.K.]’a g\u00f6nderdi\u011fi, \u015f\u00fcpheli [G.Y.]’\u0131n [M.] \u015eirketini ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131rken \u015f\u00fcpheliler [G.K.] ve [T.T.]’n\u0131n bir ba\u015fka bulu\u015fmada paran\u0131n yat\u0131r\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 hesaptan personel \u00f6demesi yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131n\u0131, paran\u0131n hesapta bloke olma ihtimaline kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k paran\u0131n nakit olarak verilmesini istedikleri, \u015f\u00fcpheli [F.K.] ve [G.Y.]’\u0131n de ald\u0131klar\u0131 hurda kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00f6deme yapabileceklerini s\u00f6yledikleri bu konuda taraflar\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131 olarak anla\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131, \u015f\u00fcpheli [G.]’nin al\u0131nacak hurdalar konusunda yetki belgesi istedi\u011fi, \u015f\u00fcpheliler [T.T.] ve [G.K.]’unyetki belgesini hallettiklerini s\u00f6yledikleri, <\/p>\n
…<\/p>\n
21\/02\/2020 tarihinde \u015f\u00fcpheliler [G.Y.] ve [F.K.]’un yanlar\u0131nda \u015f\u00fcpheli[Z.T.] ve operat\u00f6r [N.] isimli \u015fah\u0131s ile gittikleri, \u015fantiye alan\u0131nda bulunan hurdalar\u0131n g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fclece\u011fine dair bilgisi olmayan koyundere fen i\u015fleri \u015fantiyesinde \u015fantiye amiri olarak g\u00f6rev yapmakta olan \u015f\u00fcpheli [K.Y.]’\u00fcn bu hususu \u015f\u00fcpheli [G.K.]’a sordu\u011funda, \u015f\u00fcpheli [G.K.]’un kendisini ba\u015fkan\u0131n g\u00f6revlendirdi\u011fini, ayr\u0131ca g\u00f6revlendirme yaz\u0131s\u0131 da oldu\u011funu belirtti\u011fi, <\/p>\n
…<\/p>\n
… \u015f\u00fcpheli [T.T.]’n\u0131n be\u015f dakika sonra d\u00f6nerek belediye ba\u015fkan\u0131 ad\u0131na \u0131slak imzal\u0131, ka\u015feli, yetkilendirme belgesini getirip \u015f\u00fcpheli [G.Y.]’a verdi\u011fi, \u015f\u00fcpheli [G.Y.] ve \u015f\u00fcpheli [G.K.]’un ayr\u0131larak belediyenin fen i\u015fleri \u015fantiyesine d\u00f6nd\u00fckleri ve \u015fantiyede s\u00f6k\u00fcm hurda ta\u015f\u0131ma i\u015fine ba\u015flad\u0131klar\u0131, <\/p>\n
\u0130zmir Kriminal Polis Laboratuvar M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn 21\/11\/2020 tarihli raporunda, Menemen Belediye Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Yaz\u0131 \u0130\u015fleri M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnce bila tarihli d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f bir adet yetkilendirme belgesinin incelenmesinde,<\/p>\n
…<\/p>\n
S\u00f6z konusu ka\u015fenin \u015f\u00fcpheli Serdar AKSOY’un bilgisi ve izni do\u011frultusunda kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n \u015f\u00fcpheli [M.C.] taraf\u0131ndan da belirtildi\u011fi, <\/p>\n
\u015e\u00fcpheli [K.Y.]’\u00fc \u015f\u00fcpheli Serdar AKSOY’un whatsaptan arad\u0131\u011f\u0131nda \u015f\u00fcpheli Serdar AKSOY’un hurdalar\u0131n sat\u0131\u015f\u0131 ile ilgili bilgisi oldu\u011funu, \u0130zmir ilindeki CHP li belediyelerin sat\u0131\u015flar\u0131n\u0131 tek firma \u00fczerinden d\u00fczenli bir\u015fey yapt\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, herhangi bir s\u0131k\u0131nt\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi\u011fi, \u015f\u00fcpheli [K.Y.]”\u00fcn \u015f\u00fcpheli [M.C.] ile de g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, \u015f\u00fcpheli [M.C.]’in kendisine konunun Serdar Ba\u015fkanca bilindi\u011fini, herhangi bir s\u0131k\u0131nt\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi\u011fi,<\/p>\n
…<\/p>\n
(\u015e\u00fcpheli [K.Y.]’\u00fcn Sulh Ceza Hakimli\u011finde sorgusunda \u015f\u00fcpheli Serdar AKSOY’un kendisini whatsaptan arad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131… kendisinden kamera g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerinin silinmesini isteyen ki\u015finin \u015f\u00fcpheli Serdar AKSOY oldu\u011fu, ancak kendisinin silmedi\u011fini belirtti\u011fi)<\/p>\n
…<\/p>\n
Mali Su\u00e7larla M\u00fccadele \u015eube M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnce d\u00fczenlenen raporda kamera g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcs\u00fc izleme inceleme ve tespit tutana\u011f\u0131nda Menemen Belediyesi Koyundere \u015eantiyesinde bulunan hurdalar\u0131n su\u00e7 tarihinde tespiti yap\u0131lan kay\u0131tlarda;… [G.K.], [G.Y.], [F.K.] ve kimli\u011fi tespit edilemeyen ki\u015finin [K.B.] isimli i\u015fyerine giri\u015f yapt\u0131klar\u0131, [K.B.] isimli i\u015fyerine gelen hurda y\u00fckl\u00fc ara\u00e7lar\u0131n \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131…<\/p>\n
…<\/p>\n
Menemen Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca yap\u0131lan soru\u015fturmada zimmet miktar\u0131n\u0131n tespit edilmemi\u015f nedeniyle Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131zca g\u00f6revlendirilen bilirki\u015fi raporunda d\u00fczenlenen 08\/02\/2021 tarihli raporda Menemen Belediyesi Koyundere \u015eantiyesinde bulunan hurdalar\u0131n usuls\u00fcz bir \u015fekilde ta\u015f\u0131nmas\u0131 ile ilgili hurdalar\u0131n nakliyesinde kullan\u0131lan ve haklar\u0131nda ek kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 karar\u0131 verilen hurda ara\u00e7lar\u0131n \u015fof\u00f6rlerinin beyanlar\u0131, kamera g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerinden tespit edilen hurda ara\u00e7 plakalar\u0131 ve hurda y\u00fcklemesi yapan ara\u00e7lar\u0131n y\u00fckleme kapasiteleri ve sefer say\u0131lar\u0131 dikkate al\u0131narak hurda nakliyesi yapan ara\u00e7lar\u0131n \u00fc\u00e7 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde 285091 k\u011f hurda nakliyesi yapt\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n tahmin edildi\u011fi, hurda i\u015finin fiyatlar\u0131n\u0131n piyasada g\u00fcnl\u00fck oranda de\u011fi\u015fti\u011fi, ayr\u0131ca hurdan\u0131n cinsine g\u00f6re bak\u0131r, demir ve plastik olmas\u0131 ile pazarl\u0131k fiyat\u0131na g\u00f6re fiyat\u0131n de\u011fi\u015febilece\u011fi, kesin bir rakam olmamakla birlikte Menemen Belediyesi Koyundere \u015eantiyesinde al\u0131nan hurdalar\u0131n 285091 k\u011f olup hurda kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bedelinin 632.654,75 TL oldu\u011funun tespitinin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131,<\/p>\n
…<\/p>\n
Menemen Belediyesi Mali Hizmetler M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc taraf\u0131ndan [S.G.D.] San. Tic. Ltd. \u015eti. firmas\u0131na hitaben 16.10.2020 tarihli …belgenin; 5018 say\u0131l\u0131 kanunun 71\u2019inci maddesi ve Kamu Zararlar\u0131n\u0131n tahsiline y\u00f6nelik y\u00f6netmelik h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re 06.10.2020 tarihli- ve 17431 -say\u0131l\u0131 dilek\u00e7enize istinaden taraf\u0131n\u0131za ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen tahakkuk olan 190.000,00 TL\u2019yi belediyemizin Menemen Vak\u0131flar Bankas\u0131 \u015fubesindeki… iban numaram\u0131za ivedilikle yat\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 hususunda, gere\u011finin bilgilerinize rica ederim. \u015feklinde oldu\u011fu,<\/p>\n
Vak\u0131flar bankas\u0131 \u00d6zkanlar \u015fubesinin 16.10.2020 tarihinde saat 15:37 de [S.G.D.] San. Tic. Ltd. \u015eti. (.. \u00f6deyen, Menemene Belediyesi al\u0131c\u0131 olarak g\u00f6r\u00fcnd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve belediye hesab\u0131na 190.000 TL para yat\u0131rma i\u015flemi yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, dekontun a\u00e7\u0131klama b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde ihtirazi kay\u0131tla 06.10.2020 tarih ve … dilek\u00e7eye istinaden [S.G.D.] San. Tic. Ltd. \u015eti…. ad\u0131na belediyeye ait \u015fantiyedeki hurda sat\u0131\u015f bedeli yaz\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u0130\u015flem yapan (paray\u0131 yat\u0131ran) F.U. olarak g\u00f6r\u00fcnd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc,<\/p>\n
…<\/p>\n
\u015e\u00fcpheli Serdar AKSOY yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere belediye \u015fantiyesinde bulunan ve MKE’ye teslimi gereken hurda malzemelerinin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak sat\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u015f\u00fcpheli [G.Y.]’\u0131n yetkilendirilmesine dair belgenin \u015f\u00fcpheli Serdar AKSOY eli \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fc olmasa dahi, \u015f\u00fcpheli Serdar AKSOY’un hurdalar\u0131n \u015fantiye alan\u0131ndan \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bilgisinin oldu\u011funun bir\u00e7ok \u015f\u00fcpheli savunmas\u0131nda ge\u00e7ti\u011fi, \u015e\u00fcpheli [G.Y.]’a verilen yetki belgesinin hafta i\u00e7i mesai saatlerinde kendisinin bilgisi d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kullan\u0131lamayan ka\u015fe imzas\u0131yla imzaland\u0131\u011f\u0131, hurdalar\u0131n nakliyesi s\u0131ras\u0131nda kendisine ait arac\u0131n olay yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclendi\u011fi, nakliye s\u0131ras\u0131nda olay yerinde bulunan ki\u015filerle yak\u0131n ili\u015fkiler i\u00e7erisinde oldu\u011fu, yine bu ki\u015filerle aras\u0131nda para al\u0131\u015fveri\u015finin oldu\u011fu, eylem tarihinin ilk g\u00fcn\u00fc olan 21\/02\/2020 tarihinde \u015fantiye amiri olarak g\u00f6rev yapan [K.Y.] ile whatsap g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesinde \u015f\u00fcpheli Serdar Aksoy’un oraya gelen arkada\u015flar \u0130zmir B\u00fcy\u00fck\u015fehir Belediyesinin de anla\u015fm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu hurda firmas\u0131 \u0130zmir’deki CHP \u0130l\u00e7e Belediyelerinde bulunan hurdalar\u0131 bunlar al\u0131yorlar. Konu ile ilgili bir s\u0131k\u0131nt\u0131 yok. Arkada\u015flar neyi alacaklar\u0131n\u0131 biliyorlar. Bilgim dahilinde \u015feklinde yan\u0131t vermi\u015f olmas\u0131, Koyundere \u015fantiye \u015fefi [K.Y.]\u2019\u00fcn vermi\u015f oldu\u011fu beyanda,21-22-23.02.2020 tarihlerinde Menemen Belediyesine ait \u015fantiyeden gayri hukuki yollardan [G.Y.] ve [F.K.] taraf\u0131ndan \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131lan hurdalar\u0131n \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131na ait kamera g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerinin silinmesinin ba\u015fkan Serdar AKSOY taraf\u0131ndan makam\u0131nda bizzat [K.Y.]\u2019ten talep edilmesi, Ba\u015fkan Serdar AKSOY\u2019un, [K.Y.]\u2019\u00fc, [N.K.]\u2019y\u0131, [T.T.]\u2019y\u0131 ve [M.C.]\u2019i Menemen il\u00e7esindeki Menemen \u015eehir Park\u0131n\u0131n i\u00e7erisindeki park m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ofisine \u00e7a\u011f\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131, Ba\u015fkan Serdar AKSOY \u00f6ncelikle [K.Y.]\u2019e savc\u0131l\u0131\u011fa ve emniyete gidip gitmedi\u011fini sordu\u011fu, ve \u015fantiyedeki usuls\u00fcz hurda \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f\u0131 i\u015finin d\u00fczeltilmesi gerekti\u011fini, medyaya yans\u0131yan g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcler oldu\u011funu, usuls\u00fcz hurda \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, olay\u0131n tamamiyle spek\u00fclatif haberler oldu\u011fu i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131lan personellerin g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcleri almas\u0131yla ilgili iftira ve yalan beyanlarda bulunduklar\u0131na dair mobing uygulanmak suretiyle [T.T.], [N.K.] ve [K.Y.] ve [M.C.] isimli \u015f\u00fcphelilerin tutanaklar tanzim ettirerek [M.\u00c7.]’a bu tutanaklar\u0131 vermek suretiyle usuls\u00fcz sat\u0131lan hurdalar\u0131n idari soru\u015fturmas\u0131n\u0131 y\u00f6nlendirerek su\u00e7un ortaya \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131n\u0131 engellemesi,… \u015f\u00fcpheli Serdar AKSOY’un zimmet su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011fi,…”<\/p>\n
6. Kar\u015f\u0131yaka 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi (1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi) 18\/3\/2021 tarihli tensip incelemesiyle, at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7un t\u00fcr\u00fc, su\u00e7un i\u015flendi\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde kuvvetli su\u00e7 \u015f\u00fcphesi bulunmas\u0131, kan\u0131tlar\u0131n yeterince toplanmam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131, kan\u0131tlar\u0131 etkileme, karartma ve ka\u00e7ma \u015f\u00fcphesinin bulunmas\u0131, at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7un katalog su\u00e7lardan olmas\u0131, adli kontrol\u00fcn yetersiz kalaca\u011f\u0131, tutuklulu\u011fun orant\u0131l\u0131 olmas\u0131 ve tutukluluk s\u00fcreleri g\u00f6zetilerek ba\u015fvurucunun tutukluluk h\u00e2linin devam\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. Yarg\u0131lama a\u015famas\u0131nda da ba\u015fvurucunun tutukluluk h\u00e2line itirazlar\u0131 ve tahliye talepleri a\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemelerince incelenerek at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7un t\u00fcr\u00fc, katalog su\u00e7 olmas\u0131, tutuklu kal\u0131nan s\u00fcre, savunmalar\u0131n al\u0131nmam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 nedeniyle reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. 11\/5\/2021 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucunun tahliye talebi, at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7un t\u00fcr\u00fc, su\u00e7un i\u015flendi\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde kuvvetli su\u00e7 \u015f\u00fcphesi bulunmas\u0131, kan\u0131tlar\u0131n yeterince toplanmam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131, kan\u0131tlar\u0131 etkileme, karartma ve ka\u00e7ma \u015f\u00fcphelerinin bulunmas\u0131, adli kontrol\u00fcn yetersiz kalaca\u011f\u0131, tutuklulu\u011fun orant\u0131l\u0131 olmas\u0131 ile tutukluluk s\u00fcresinin g\u00f6zetildi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle reddedilmi\u015f ve tutukluluk h\u00e2linin devam\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucunun bu karara kar\u015f\u0131 yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz da 3\/6\/2021 tarihinde reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. Ba\u015fvurucu, ret karar\u0131n\u0131 9\/6\/2021 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendi\u011fini belirtmi\u015f olup 5\/7\/2021 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
9. Ulusal Yarg\u0131 A\u011f\u0131 Bili\u015fim Sistemi (UYAP) \u00fczerinden yap\u0131lan incelemede, 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesindeki 7\/7\/2021 tarihli ilk duru\u015fmada ba\u015fvurucunun mahkeme huzurunda savunmas\u0131n\u0131 yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131, 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesince tutuklulukta ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre, infaz rejimi, delillerin toplanm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131, ka\u00e7ma ya da delilleri karartma \u015f\u00fcphesinin bulunmamas\u0131, kesinle\u015fen cezan\u0131n infaz\u0131n\u0131n her an m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmas\u0131 dikkate al\u0131narak tutukluluktan beklenen tedbirin adli kontrol tedbiriyle de sa\u011flanabilecek olmas\u0131 gerek\u00e7eleriyle ba\u015fvurucu ve di\u011fer tutuklular\u0131n tahliyesine, haklar\u0131nda en yak\u0131n polis merkezine ba\u015fvurarak imza atma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ile yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131 \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f yasa\u011f\u0131 \u015feklinde adli kontrol tedbiri uygulanmas\u0131na karar verildi\u011fi tespit edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
10. 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi 12\/4\/2023 tarihinde di\u011fer san\u0131klar hakk\u0131nda verdi\u011fi \u00e7e\u015fitli h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin yan\u0131 s\u0131ra ba\u015fvurucu ve di\u011fer san\u0131k G.K. hakk\u0131nda basit zimmet su\u00e7undan neticeten 2 y\u0131l 6 ay hapis cezas\u0131na h\u00fckmetmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
11. Ba\u015fvurucunun istinaf talebini inceleyen \u0130zmir B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 18\/7\/2023 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn bozulmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
12. Bozma karar\u0131 sonras\u0131 yarg\u0131lama 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinde devam etmektedir.<\/p>\n
13. Komisyonca ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
A. Tutuklulu\u011fun Makul S\u00fcreyi A\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131na \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
14. Ba\u015fvurucu; makul s\u00fcrede h\u00e2kim\/mahkeme \u00f6n\u00fcne \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, tutuklulu\u011fun devam\u0131 kararlar\u0131n\u0131n da haks\u0131z ve gerek\u00e7esiz oldu\u011funu belirterek ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
15. Anayasa Mahkemesi, tutuklulu\u011fun kanunda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen azami s\u00fcreyi veya makul s\u00fcreyi a\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131yla yap\u0131lan bireysel ba\u015fvurular bak\u0131m\u0131ndan bireysel ba\u015fvurunun incelendi\u011fi tarih itibar\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucu tahliye edilmi\u015f veya h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc h\u00e2le gelmi\u015f ise as\u0131l dava sonu\u00e7lanmam\u0131\u015f da olsa -ilgili Yarg\u0131tay i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131na at\u0131f yaparak- 4\/12\/2004 tarihli ve 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu’nun 141. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7ma imk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmesi gereken etkili bir hukuk yolu oldu\u011fu sonucuna varm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (Erkam Abdurrahman Ak, B. No: 2014\/8515, 28\/9\/2016, \u00a7\u00a7 48-62; \u0130rfan Ger\u00e7ek, B. No: 2014\/6500, 29\/9\/2016, \u00a7\u00a7 33-45; Ahmet Kubilay Tezcan, B. No: 2014\/3473, 25\/1\/2018, \u00a7 26). Somut olayda 7\/7\/2021 tarihinde tahliye edilen ba\u015fvurucu y\u00f6n\u00fcnden an\u0131lan kararlardan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren bir durumun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
16. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurunun bu k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
B. Tutukluluk \u0130ncelemelerinin H\u00e2kim\/Mahkeme \u00d6n\u00fcne \u00c7\u0131kar\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n Yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
17. Ba\u015fvurucu; tutuklu\u011fun devam\u0131na ili\u015fkin kararlar\u0131n dosya \u00fczerinden yap\u0131lan incelemeyle verildi\u011fini belirterek ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
18. Anayasa Mahkemesi Kadir Ayhan (B. No: 2020\/20083, 10\/3\/2021) ve Yavuz Cengiz (B. No: 2019\/37138, 15\/6\/2021) kararlar\u0131nda bu \u015fik\u00e2yetlere ili\u015fkin yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 incelemelerde, ba\u015fvurucunun inceleme tarihi itibar\u0131yla h\u00e2kim\/mahkeme \u00f6n\u00fcne \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 hususunu nazara alarak verilecek bir ihlal karar\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvurucunun yeniden h\u00e2kim \u00f6n\u00fcne \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve serbest kalmas\u0131 sonucunu do\u011furmayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015f; bu durumda yaln\u0131zca ki\u015finin uzun s\u00fcre h\u00e2kim\/mahkeme \u00f6n\u00fcne \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmamas\u0131yla ilgili bir hak ihlalinin tespiti ve gerekiyorsa belli bir miktar tazminata h\u00fckmedilmesiyle yetinilece\u011fi sonucuna varm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
19. \u00d6te yandan Anayasa Mahkemesi an\u0131lan kararda bu t\u00fcr ihlal iddialar\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan \u00f6ncelikle ayn\u0131 giderim imk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flayan ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmesi ve bunlardan sonu\u00e7 al\u0131namamas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunulmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini a\u00e7\u0131klayarak 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 141. maddesinde belirtilen dava yolunun ba\u015fvurucunun durumuna uygun, telafi kabiliyetini haiz, etkili bir hukuk yolu oldu\u011fu tespitini yapm\u0131\u015f ve ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmedi\u011fi sonucuna varm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
20. Somut olayda 24\/12\/2020, 14\/1\/2021, 12\/2\/2021 ve 8\/3\/2021 tarihlerinde vekili vas\u0131tas\u0131yla duru\u015fmalarda tutuklulu\u011fa itirazlar\u0131n\u0131 ileten ba\u015fvurucunun 7\/7\/2021 tarihli ilk duru\u015fmada mahkeme \u00f6n\u00fcne \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve savunmas\u0131n\u0131 yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla somut iddia y\u00f6n\u00fcnden an\u0131lan kararlardan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren bir durum s\u00f6z konusu de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n
21. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurunun bu k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n da ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
C. Tutuklaman\u0131n Hukuki Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
22. Ba\u015fvurucu; tutuklanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in zimmet su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011fine dair kuvvetli su\u00e7 \u015f\u00fcphesi ve tutuklama nedeni bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, su\u00e7un katalog su\u00e7lardan olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, adli kontrol\u00fcn ni\u00e7in yetersiz kalaca\u011f\u0131na dair gerek\u00e7enin yetersiz oldu\u011funu belirterek ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131 ile masumiyet karinesinin ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
23. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde; ba\u015fvurucunun tutukluluk incelemelerinin duru\u015fmas\u0131z yap\u0131lmas\u0131 ve\/veya makul s\u00fcrede h\u00e2kim\/mahkeme \u00f6n\u00fcne \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmama \u015fik\u00e2yetleri bak\u0131m\u0131ndan tazminat davas\u0131 yolunu t\u00fcketip t\u00fcketmedi\u011fi hususunun ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik incelemesi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan g\u00f6zetilmesi gerekti\u011fini, tutuklaman\u0131n hukukili\u011fi iddias\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan H\u00e2kimli\u011fin tutuklama gerek\u00e7elerinin yap\u0131lacak de\u011ferlendirmede g\u00f6zetilmesi gerekti\u011fini, tutuklulu\u011fun makul s\u00fcreyi a\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddialar\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ise Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesinin organize su\u00e7lar a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan makul g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc tutukluluk s\u00fcrelerinin de\u011ferlendirmede dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini bildirmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyan\u0131nda ba\u015fvuru s\u0131ras\u0131ndaki iddialar\u0131n\u0131 yinelemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
24. Ba\u015fvurunun bu k\u0131sm\u0131 da ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
25. Anayasa Mahkemesi i\u00e7tihad\u0131na g\u00f6re tutuklama tedbirinin uyguland\u0131\u011f\u0131 yarg\u0131lama neticesinde verilen karar\u0131n\u0131n kesinle\u015fmi\u015f olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde ba\u015fvurucunun tutuklaman\u0131n hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu iddias\u0131na y\u00f6nelik olarak 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 141. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (a) bendi kapsam\u0131nda tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7abilece\u011fi kabul edildi\u011finden (Re\u015fat Ertan, B. No: 2013\/5700, 15\/4\/2015, \u00a7 26; \u00d6mer K\u00f6se, B. No: 2014\/12036, 16\/11\/2016, \u00a7 34; Eyy\u00fcp G\u00fcne\u015f [GK], B. No: 2017\/28308, 21\/10\/2021, \u00a7 88; Murat A\u011f\u0131rel ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2020\/11655, 7\/4\/2022, \u00a7\u00a7 23-26) somut olayda ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131ndaki h\u00fck\u00fcm hen\u00fcz kesinle\u015fmemi\u015f olmakla, ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketildi\u011fi sonucuna var\u0131lan ve a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmay\u0131p kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun bu k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
26. Somut olayda \u00f6ncelikle ba\u015fvurucunun tutuklanmas\u0131n\u0131n kanuni dayana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesi gerekir. Ba\u015fvurucu, zimmet su\u00e7undan 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 100. maddesi uyar\u0131nca tutuklanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda uygulanan tutuklama tedbirinin kanuni dayana\u011f\u0131 bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
27. Kanuni dayana\u011f\u0131 bulundu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan tutuklama tedbirinin me\u015fru bir amac\u0131n\u0131n olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc incelenmeden \u00f6nce tutuklaman\u0131n \u00f6n ko\u015fulu olan su\u00e7un i\u015flendi\u011fine dair kuvvetli belirti bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
28. Bu noktada her somut olayda tutuklaman\u0131n \u00f6n ko\u015fulu olan su\u00e7un i\u015flendi\u011fine dair kuvvetli belirtinin olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, tutuklama nedenlerinin bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ve tutuklama tedbirinin \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn takdiri \u00f6ncelikle an\u0131lan tedbiri uygulayan yarg\u0131 mercilerine ait oldu\u011funun zira bu konuda taraflarla ve delillerle do\u011frudan temas h\u00e2linde olan yarg\u0131 mercileri Anayasa Mahkemesine k\u0131yasla daha iyi konumda oldu\u011funun yeniden ifade edilmesi gerekir (G\u00fclser Y\u0131ld\u0131r\u0131m (2) [GK], B. No: 2016\/40170, 16\/11\/2017 \u00a7\u00a7 123, 124).<\/p>\n
29. Ba\u015fvurucunun tutuklanmas\u0131na esas te\u015fkil eden eylemi i\u015fledi\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde \u00e7e\u015fitli tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131, Makine ve Kimya End\u00fcstrisi M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn yaz\u0131s\u0131, g\u00f6revlendirme ve yetkilendirme yaz\u0131lar\u0131, banka hesap hareketleri inceleme tutana\u011f\u0131, Mali Su\u00e7lar M\u00fccadele \u015eube M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn raporu, dijital materyallerin incelemesi sonucu d\u00fczenlenen rapor, kamera g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcs\u00fc inceleme ve tespit tutanaklar\u0131, ses kayd\u0131 d\u00f6k\u00fcm\u00fc, \u0130zmir Kriminal Polis Laboratuvar M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn raporu gibi deliller mevcuttur (bkz. \u00a7\u00a7 3, 5).<\/p>\n
30. Anayasa Mahkemesi; ki\u015finin su\u00e7la itham edilebilmesi i\u00e7in yakalama veya tutuklama an\u0131nda delillerin yeterli d\u00fczeyde toplanm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131n\u0131n mutlaka gerekli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 zira tutuklulu\u011fun amac\u0131n\u0131n, y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturma ve\/veya kovu\u015fturma s\u0131ras\u0131nda ki\u015finin tutuklanmas\u0131n\u0131n temelini olu\u015fturan \u015f\u00fcphelerin do\u011frulu\u011funu kan\u0131tlayarak veya ortadan kald\u0131rarak adli s\u00fcreci daha sa\u011fl\u0131kl\u0131 bir \u015fekilde y\u00fcr\u00fctmek oldu\u011funu, buna g\u00f6re su\u00e7 isnad\u0131na esas te\u015fkil edecek \u015f\u00fcphelere dayanak olu\u015fturan olgular ile ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131n\u0131n sonraki a\u015famalar\u0131nda tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lacak olan ve mahk\u00fbmiyete gerek\u00e7e olu\u015fturacak olgular\u0131n ayn\u0131 d\u00fczeyde de\u011ferlendirilmemesi gerekti\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir (Mustafa Ali Balbay, B. No: 2012\/1272,4\/12\/2013, \u00a7 73; Mehmet Haberal, B. No: 2012\/849, 4\/12\/2013, \u00a7 71).<\/p>\n
31. \u00d6te yandan tutuklama a\u015famas\u0131nda su\u00e7un s\u00fcbutu gerekmedi\u011fi i\u00e7in isnat edilen eylemin tutuklama karar\u0131nda belirtilen su\u00e7tan ba\u015fka bir su\u00e7u olu\u015fturma ihtimali olmas\u0131 tutuklama karar\u0131n\u0131 salt bu nedenle hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 hale getirmeyecektir. Ayr\u0131ca Anayasa Mahkemesi bir\u00e7ok karar\u0131nda somut olgular i\u00e7eren tan\u0131k anlat\u0131mlar\u0131n\u0131 su\u00e7 \u015f\u00fcphesini do\u011frulayan kuvvetli bir belirti olarak kabul etmi\u015ftir (Metin Evecen, B. No: 2017\/744, 4\/4\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 47-52, Recep Uygun, B. No: 2016\/76351, 12\/6\/2018, \u00a7 43; \u0130smail \u00c7\u0131tak, B. No: 2016\/78629, 28\/11\/2019, \u00a7 52; Y.G., B. No: 2017\/5933, 9\/1\/2020, \u00a7 55; \u0130brahim Okur, B. No: 2016\/50394, 27\/2\/2020, \u00a7 82; Mustafa Onuk, B. No: 2016\/21484, 9\/7\/2020, \u00a7\u00a7 49-52; Yusuf Erdo\u011fan, B. No: 2017\/11828, 10\/2\/2021, \u00a7 46).<\/p>\n
32. T\u00fcm bu bilgiler \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, tutuklamaya esas deliller g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun isnat edilen eylemleri i\u015fledi\u011fine y\u00f6nelik kuvvetli su\u00e7 \u015f\u00fcphesinin mevcut oldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin kabul\u00fcn temelsiz ve keyf\u00ee oldu\u011fu s\u00f6ylenemeyecektir.<\/p>\n
33. Ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda uygulanan ve kuvvetli su\u00e7 \u015f\u00fcphesinin bulunmas\u0131 \u015feklindeki \u00f6n ko\u015fulun mevcut oldu\u011fu tutuklama tedbirinin me\u015fru bir amac\u0131n\u0131n olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
34. Tutuklama karar\u0131nda; eylemin a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131, zimmete ge\u00e7irilen hurdalar\u0131n niteli\u011fi ve miktar\u0131 bir arada de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde ba\u015fvurucunun serbest kalmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu durumun ceza adaletiyle ba\u011fda\u015fmayaca\u011f\u0131, isnat edilen eylemin cezas\u0131n\u0131n kanunda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen alt ve \u00fcst s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131, delillerin tam olarak toplanmam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 nedeniyle de\u011fi\u015ftirilme\/karart\u0131lma \u015f\u00fcphesinin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131, adli kontrol tedbirlerinin yetersiz kalaca\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7elerine dayan\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
35. Somut olayda 24\/11\/2020 tarihinde tutuklanan ba\u015fvurucu; yakla\u015f\u0131k 7 ayl\u0131k tutuklulu\u011funun ard\u0131ndan 7\/7\/2021 tarihinde tutuklulukta ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre, infaz rejimi, delillerin toplanm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131, ka\u00e7ma ya da delilleri karartma \u015f\u00fcphesinin bulunmamas\u0131, kesinle\u015fen cezan\u0131n infaz\u0131n\u0131n her an m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmas\u0131 dikkate al\u0131narak tutukluluktan beklenen tedbirin adli kontrol tedbiriyle de sa\u011flanabilecek olmas\u0131 gerek\u00e7eleriyle hakk\u0131nda adli kontrol tedbiri uygulanarak tahliye edilmi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7 9).<\/p>\n
36. Ba\u015fvurucunun MKE’ye devri zorunlu olan hurda nitelikteki e\u015fyalar\u0131n ihale yap\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n usuls\u00fcz \u015fekilde sat\u0131\u015f\u0131ndan haberdar oldu\u011funa, hurdalar\u0131n devri s\u0131ras\u0131nda kullan\u0131lan yetkilendirme belgesinin ba\u015fvurucunun bilgisi dahilinde d\u00fczenlendi\u011fine ili\u015fkin tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda \u00e7ok say\u0131da olgusal saptaman\u0131n bulundu\u011fu somut olaydadelillerin karart\u0131lma ihtimaline y\u00f6nelik olarak ba\u015fvurucunun kamera kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n silinmesi talimat\u0131na ili\u015fkin tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131 gibi tespitler bulundu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamda somut olay\u0131n ko\u015fullar\u0131 ile ba\u015fvurucuya isnat edilen su\u00e7a ili\u015fkin soru\u015fturmada delillerin toplanmas\u0131 s\u00fcrecinin devam etti\u011fi ve tutukluluk h\u00e2line ili\u015fkin mahkeme kararlar\u0131n\u0131n esasen delillerin tamam\u0131n\u0131n toplanmam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 gerek\u00e7esine dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda \u00f6zellikle delillerin yok edilmesi, gizlenmesi veya de\u011fi\u015ftirilmesi \u015f\u00fcphesine y\u00f6nelik olarak ba\u015fvurucu y\u00f6n\u00fcnden tutuklama nedenlerinin olgusal temellerinin oldu\u011fu s\u00f6ylenebilir.<\/p>\n
37. \u00d6te yandan ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131ndaki tutuklama tedbirinin \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fc olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n da belirlenmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
38. Ba\u015fvurucunun tutuklanmas\u0131na temel olan soru\u015fturmada bir\u00e7ok \u015f\u00fcphelinin bulundu\u011fu ve delillerin toplanmas\u0131na devam edildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Bu hususlar da dikkate al\u0131narak ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda yakla\u015f\u0131k 8 ay uygulanan tutuklama tedbirinin \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fc oldu\u011fu ve adli kontrol uygulamas\u0131n\u0131n yetersiz kalaca\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n keyf\u00ee ve temelsiz oldu\u011fu s\u00f6ylenemez.<\/p>\n
39. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edilmedi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. 1. Tutuklulu\u011fun makul s\u00fcreyi a\u015fmas\u0131 dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
2. Tutukluluk incelemelerinin h\u00e2kim\/mahkeme \u00f6n\u00fcne \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n yap\u0131lmas\u0131 dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
3. Tutuklaman\u0131n hukuki olmamas\u0131 nedeniyle ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. Tutuklaman\u0131n hukuki olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan Anayasa’n\u0131n 19. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LMED\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
C. Yarg\u0131lama giderlerinin ba\u015fvurucu \u00fczerinde BIRAKILMASINA,<\/p>\n
D. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 29\/4\/2025 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 29\/4\/2025 tarihli ve 2021\/29035 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR SERDAR AKSOY BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/29035) Karar Tarihi: 29\/4\/2025 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Recai AKYEL Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ Selahaddin MENTE\u015e Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : Ayd\u0131n DEM\u0130REL Ba\u015fvurucu : Serdar AKSOY Vekili : Av. Mesut YILDIZ I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru; tutuklama tedbirinin hukuki olmamas\u0131, tutukluluk incelemelerinin h\u00e2kim\/mahkeme \u00f6n\u00fcne \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n yap\u0131lmas\u0131 ve tutuklulu\u011fun makul s\u00fcreyi a\u015fmas\u0131 nedeniyle ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu, Menemen il\u00e7e belediye ba\u015fkan\u0131 olarak g\u00f6rev yapmakta iken Menemen Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) taraf\u0131ndan zimmet su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011fi isnad\u0131yla ba\u015flat\u0131lan soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda 20\/11\/2020 tarihinde g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 3. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucu ve di\u011fer \u015f\u00fcphelilerin zimmet su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde kuvvetli su\u00e7 \u015f\u00fcphesinin ve tutuklama nedenlerinin bulundu\u011fu belirtilerek tutuklama talebinde bulunulmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fvurucu ve baz\u0131 \u015f\u00fcpheliler 23\/11\/2020 tarihinde sevk edildikleri Menemen Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fi (H\u00e2kimlik) taraf\u0131ndan 24\/11\/2020 tarihinde m\u00fcsnet su\u00e7tan tutuklanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Tutuklama karar\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7esi \u015f\u00f6yledir: “…\u015e\u00fcpheli Serdar Aksoy’un \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 zimmet su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011fine dair kuvvetli su\u00e7 \u015f\u00fcphesinin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6sterir olgular\u0131 bulunmas\u0131, (bu somut olgulardan Kanun Y\u00f6netmelik ve Genelge uyar\u0131nca Menemen Belediyesine ait hurda e\u015fyalar\u0131n ancak MKE ye devrinin yap\u0131labilece\u011fi, bunun d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda 3. \u015fah\u0131slara sat\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n s\u00f6z konusu olmayaca\u011f\u0131, Kanunu bilmeme durumunun mazeret say\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131, \u015f\u00fcpheli her ne kadar …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-120120","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n