{"id":112945,"date":"2025-06-11T00:09:00","date_gmt":"2025-06-10T21:09:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uncategorized-tr\/yargitay-3-hukuk-dairesinin-2018-3204-e-2018-6267-k-sayili-karari\/"},"modified":"2025-06-11T00:09:00","modified_gmt":"2025-06-10T21:09:00","slug":"yargitay-3-hukuk-dairesinin-2018-3204-e-2018-6267-k-sayili-karari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-3-hukuk-dairesinin-2018-3204-e-2018-6267-k-sayili-karari\/","title":{"rendered":"Yarg\u0131tay 3. Hukuk Dairesi&#8217;nin 2018\/3204 E., 2018\/6267 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>T.C.<\/p>\n<p>Yarg\u0131tay<\/p>\n<p>3. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n<p>2018\/3204 E., 2018\/6267 K.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>MAHKEMES\u0130 : ASL\u0130YE HUKUK MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n<p>Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki vasiyetnamenin iptali-tenkis davas\u0131n\u0131n mahkemece yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 sonucunda, davan\u0131n reddine y\u00f6nelik olarak verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn, s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde davac\u0131 &#8230; taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine; temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin kabul\u00fcne karar verildikten sonra, dosya i\u00e7erisindeki ka\u011f\u0131tlar okunup gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p>Y A R G I T A Y K A R A R I<\/p>\n<p>Davac\u0131lar; daval\u0131 ile karde\u015f olduklar\u0131n\u0131, muris babalar\u0131 &#8230;&#8217;un vefat\u0131ndan \u00f6nce vasiyetname d\u00fczenleyerek de\u011ferli olarak be\u015f adet ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n\u0131 daval\u0131ya vasiyet etti\u011fini, ekonomik k\u0131ymet i\u00e7ermeyen d\u00f6rt adet ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131 da kendilerine b\u0131rakt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n tamam\u0131n\u0131n tapusuz oldu\u011funu, murisin amac\u0131n\u0131n vasiyetname yoluyla kendilerinden mal ka\u00e7\u0131rmak oldu\u011funu, yasal miras haklar\u0131n\u0131n tecav\u00fcze u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ayr\u0131ca murisin vasiyetname tarihinde hukuki i\u015flem ehliyetine sahip olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrerek, murise ait, &#8230; Noterli\u011fi&#8217;nce d\u00fczenlenen 29\/08\/2003 tarih ve 3797 yevmiye nolu vasiyetnamenin iptaline iptaline, mahkeme aksi kanaatte ise davac\u0131lar\u0131n mahfuz hisselerini a\u015fan vasiyetnamenin tenkisine karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015flerdir.<\/p>\n<p>Daval\u0131, davac\u0131lar\u0131n iddialar\u0131n\u0131n do\u011fru olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, babas\u0131na sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131nda kendisinin bakt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, babas\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fczenlemi\u015f oldu\u011fu vasiyetname ile ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 aras\u0131nda payla\u015ft\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek, davan\u0131n reddini dilemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Mahkemece, dava konusu vasiyetnamenin kanunun arad\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015fekil \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve murisin vasiyetname d\u00fczenledi\u011fi anda hukuksal i\u015flem yapma ehliyetine sahip oldu\u011fu, bu nedenle vasiyetnamenin iptalini gerektirecek bir nedenin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, al\u0131nan bilirki\u015fi raporuna g\u00f6re davac\u0131lar\u0131n sakl\u0131 paylar\u0131na tecav\u00fcz\u00fcn de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015f, h\u00fck\u00fcm davac\u0131 &#8230; taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>1-) Dosyadaki yaz\u0131lara, karar\u0131n dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 delillerle yasaya uygun gerektirici nedenlere ve \u00f6zellikle delillerin takdirinde bir isabetsizlik bulunmamas\u0131na g\u00f6re davac\u0131 &#8230;&#8217;n\u0131n sair temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddi gerekir.<\/p>\n<p>2-) Dosyan\u0131n incelenmesinde; davac\u0131 taraf\u0131n, murisin vasiyetnameyi d\u00fczenledi\u011fi tarihte fiil ehliyetinin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<br \/>\nFiil ehliyeti yoklu\u011fu; ya\u015f k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fckl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, ak\u0131l hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131, ak\u0131l zay\u0131fl\u0131\u011f\u0131, sarho\u015fluk gibi salt biyolojik nedenlere de\u011fil, ayn\u0131 zamanda bilin\u00e7, idrak, irade gibi psikolojik unsurlara da ba\u011fl\u0131 oldu\u011fundan, ak\u0131l hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131, ak\u0131l zay\u0131fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi biyolojik ve buna ba\u011fl\u0131 psikolojik nedenlerin belirlenmesi, \u00e7ok zaman h\u00e2kimlik mesle\u011finin d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda \u00f6zel ve teknik bilgi gerektirmektedir.<\/p>\n<p>Fiil ehliyetinin nispi bir kavram olmas\u0131, ki\u015fiye, eylem ve i\u015fleme g\u00f6re de\u011fi\u015fmesi bu y\u00f6nde en yetkili sa\u011fl\u0131k kurulu\u015fu olan &#8230; Kurumundan rapor al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131 da zorunlu k\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Esasen TMK. nun 409\/2. maddesinde de, ak\u0131l hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131 veya ak\u0131l zay\u0131fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bilirki\u015fi raporu ile belirlenece\u011fi h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>Bu durumda, ehliyetsiz oldu\u011fu ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen murisin vasiyetname tarihine yak\u0131n g\u00fcnlerde ve sonras\u0131nda tedavi g\u00f6r\u00fcp g\u00f6rmedi\u011fi hususunda taraflar\u0131n bilgisine ba\u015fvurularak varsa doktor raporlar\u0131, hasta m\u00fc\u015fahede k\u00e2\u011f\u0131tlar\u0131 ve film grafilerinin eksiksiz getirtilmesi, sonras\u0131nda i\u015flem tarihinde miras b\u0131rakan\u0131n fiil ehliyetinin olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespiti i\u00e7in &#8230; Kurumundan rapor al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n<p>O halde mahkemece, ehliyetsizlik iddias\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden, i\u015flem tarihinde murisin fiil ehliyetinin olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespiti i\u00e7in &#8230; Kurumundan rapor al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekirken, &#8230; raporu al\u0131nmaks\u0131z\u0131n, eksik inceleme ve yan\u0131lg\u0131l\u0131 de\u011ferlendirme sonucu yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 do\u011fru g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f, bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>3-) Di\u011fer yandan, kabule g\u00f6re de\u011finilmesi gereken bir di\u011fer husus da davac\u0131n\u0131n tenkis talebine y\u00f6nelik yap\u0131lan incelemeye ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p>Tenkis davas\u0131, TMK&#8217;nun 560-562 maddelerinde d\u00fczenlenen, mirasb\u0131rakan\u0131n sakl\u0131 paylar\u0131 zedeleyen gerek \u00f6l\u00fcme ba\u011fl\u0131 ve gerekse sa\u011flararas\u0131 kazand\u0131rmalar\u0131n\u0131n kural olarak sakl\u0131 paylar\u0131n\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 alamayan miras\u00e7\u0131lar taraf\u0131ndan mirasb\u0131rakan\u0131n tasarruf edebilece\u011fi s\u0131n\u0131ra \u00e7ekilmesini ama\u00e7layan, \u00f6ncesine etkili, yenilik do\u011furucu davalardand\u0131r. Bu y\u00f6n\u00fcyle bak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda tenkis davas\u0131 Miras Hukukuna \u00f6zg\u00fc bir iptal davas\u0131 olarak kabul edilmelidir. (G&#8230;., Miras Hukuku, &#8230;, 2003, s.305). Tenkis, a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131z sebeplerle sakl\u0131 pay\u0131n yapt\u0131r\u0131m\u0131d\u0131r (H.Hatemi, Miras Hukuku, &#8230;, 2004, s.23).<\/p>\n<p>Tenkis, sakl\u0131 pay tamamlan\u0131ncaya kadar, \u00f6nce \u00f6l\u00fcme ba\u011fl\u0131 tasarruflardan, bu yetmezse, en yeni tarihlisinden en eskisine do\u011fru geriye gidilmek \u00fczere sa\u011flararas\u0131 kazand\u0131rmalardan yap\u0131l\u0131r (TMK.md.570).<\/p>\n<p>Sakl\u0131 paylar\u0131n zedelendi\u011finden s\u00f6z edilmesi i\u00e7in, kazand\u0131rma konusu tereke ile kazand\u0131rma d\u0131\u015f\u0131 terekenin t\u00fcm\u00fc ile bilinmesi gerekir. Bunun i\u00e7in tereke ile ilgili b\u00fct\u00fcn kay\u0131t ve belgeler dosyaya getirtilmelidir. Murisin temlik d\u0131\u015f\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n tapu kay\u0131tlar\u0131 ve di\u011fer belgeleri mahkemece re&#8217;sen tespit edilir (Yarg\u0131tay 2.HD.23.06.2005, 8487-9834)<\/p>\n<p>Mirasb\u0131rakan\u0131n sakl\u0131 pay\u0131 zedeleyip zedelemedi\u011fi &#8220;net tereke&#8221; \u00fczerinden hesaplan\u0131r. Net tereke ise, terekenin aktifinden terekenin pasifin indirilmesi ile bulunur. Terekenin aktifi; mirasb\u0131rakan\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcm tarihinde b\u0131rakm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu malvarl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile denkle\u015ftirmeye ve tenkise tabi olarak yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 kazand\u0131rmalard\u0131r. Terekenin aktifini, temlik edilenler ile temlik d\u0131\u015f\u0131 b\u0131rak\u0131lan mal varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferleri olu\u015fturmaktad\u0131r. Temlik edilen ve temlik d\u0131\u015f\u0131 olan ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n de\u011feri mirasb\u0131rakan\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcm tarihindeki bedelleri esas al\u0131narak hesaplan\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>Sakl\u0131 paya elatman\u0131n do\u011fru olarak belirlenmesi i\u00e7in temlik konusu olmayan, mirasb\u0131rakana ait her t\u00fcrl\u00fc mal varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferinin saptanmas\u0131 gerekir. Bunun i\u00e7in ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n bulundu\u011fu yerde ke\u015fif yap\u0131lmas\u0131 zorunludur(Yarg\u0131tay, 2.HD,15.11.2001, 14464-15834).<\/p>\n<p>Terekenin pasifini TMK&#8217;n\u0131n 507\/2.maddesinde a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi, mirasb\u0131rakan\u0131n bor\u00e7lar\u0131, cenaze giderleri, terekenin m\u00fch\u00fcrlenmesi ve yaz\u0131m giderleri, mirasb\u0131rakan ile birlikte ya\u015fayan ve onun taraf\u0131ndan bak\u0131lan kimselerin \u00fc\u00e7 ayl\u0131k ge\u00e7im giderleri olu\u015fturmaktad\u0131r. Terekenin pasifleri hesaptan indirilir.<\/p>\n<p>Net tereke bu \u015fekilde tespit edildikten sonra davac\u0131lar\u0131n net tereke \u00fczerinden miras pay\u0131 bulunur ve daha sonra sakl\u0131 paylar\u0131 belirlenir. \u00d6l\u00fcme ba\u011fl\u0131 tasarruflar (vasiyetnameler) mutlak tenkisine tabi tasarruflard\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>Bu durumda davan\u0131n TMK&#8217;nun 565.maddesi gere\u011fince tenkis h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re incelenmesi gerekir. Tenkiste, tasarrufa konu mal\u0131n payla\u015f\u0131m\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ara\u015ft\u0131rma yapmak i\u00e7in sabit tenkis oran\u0131 belirlenmelidir.<\/p>\n<p>Sabit tenkis oran\u0131, 11.11.1994 g\u00fcn ve 4\/4 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130\u00e7tihad\u0131 Birle\u015ftirme Karar\u0131 ile &#8220;tasarrufun t\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn de\u011feri ile daval\u0131lara yap\u0131lan fazla teberru aras\u0131nda kurulan orand\u0131r&#8221;. Sabit tenkis oran\u0131 ile el at\u0131lan sakl\u0131 pay\u0131n, tasarrufun de\u011ferine oran\u0131 ile bunun her daval\u0131ya yap\u0131lan tasarruf tutarlar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 belirlenmesi gerekir.<br \/>\n\u0130kinci olarak, temlike konu mal\u0131n k\u0131ymetine noksan gelmeden b\u00f6l\u00fcnmezli\u011finin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 saptan\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>Tasarrufa konu mal, sabit tenkis oran\u0131nda b\u00f6l\u00fcnebilir ise bu k\u0131s\u0131mlar\u0131n ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcm olarak taraflar ad\u0131na tesciline karar verilmelidir. E\u011fer, tasarrufa konu mal\u0131n sabit tenkis oran\u0131nda b\u00f6l\u00fcnmezli\u011fi ortaya \u00e7\u0131kar ise bu defa MK. madde 564&#8217;de \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen tercih hakk\u0131 g\u00fcndeme gelecektir.<\/p>\n<p>Daval\u0131ya MK. 564.maddesi uyar\u0131nca se\u00e7imlik hakk\u0131 mahkemece kulland\u0131r\u0131l\u0131r. Se\u00e7imlik hakk\u0131n\u0131n kulland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 daval\u0131 duru\u015fmada haz\u0131r ise, mal se\u00e7ip para \u00f6demeyi mi, yoksa mal verip almay\u0131 m\u0131 tercih etti\u011fi mahkemece sorulmak suretiyle, daval\u0131 duru\u015fmada de\u011fil ise kendisine bu konuda me\u015fruhatl\u0131 davetiye \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131lmak suretiyle yap\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>Daha sonra ise yine mahkemece usulen bilirki\u015fi i\u015ftirak\u0131 ile ikinci kez yap\u0131lacak bir ke\u015fif ile se\u00e7im hakk\u0131n\u0131n kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarih itibariyle murisin daval\u0131ya temlik etti\u011fi mal\u0131n de\u011feri saptan\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>En son olarak da se\u00e7imlik hakk\u0131n\u0131n kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarih itibariyle murisin daval\u0131ya temlik etti\u011fi mal\u0131n de\u011feri, \u00f6nceki bulunan sabit tenkis oran\u0131n\u0131n paydas\u0131na b\u00f6l\u00fcnerek elde edilen rakam, her bir davac\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan mahfuz hisseye tecav\u00fcz te\u015fkil eden miktar dikkate al\u0131nmak suretiyle (ba\u015fka bir deyi\u015fle, sabit tenkis oran\u0131n\u0131n pay\u0131 ile) nihayet her bir davac\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan tenkis hesab\u0131 yap\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>Somut olayda ise; mahkemece h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nan 15.06.2015 havale tarihli tenkis bilirki\u015fi raporunda murisin terekesi belirlenirken yaln\u0131zca daval\u0131ya vasiyet edilen 5 adet ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n de\u011ferinin esas al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131, di\u011fer malvarl\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlerinin (davac\u0131ya b\u0131rak\u0131lan ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar ile mevcut ise vasiyet d\u0131\u015f\u0131 di\u011fer ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n) hesaplamaya dahil edilmedi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Oysa tenkis davalar\u0131nda mirasb\u0131rakan ad\u0131na olan t\u00fcm tereke mevcudunun mirasb\u0131rakan\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcm tarihi itibariyle de\u011ferinin tespiti; gerek sabit tenkis oran\u0131n\u0131n hesaplanmas\u0131, gerekse ihlal edilen mahfuz hissenin belirlenmesi i\u00e7in zorunludur.<\/p>\n<p>Hal b\u00f6yle olunca, mahkemece; yukar\u0131da ifade edilen yasa h\u00fck\u00fcmleri ve a\u00e7\u0131klamalar dikkate al\u0131nmak suretiyle, \u00f6ncelikle vasiyetnamenin iptali y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki iddialar\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesi noktas\u0131nda dosyan\u0131n &#8230; Kurumu&#8217;na sevki sa\u011flanarak, murisin dava konusu vasiyetnamenin yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarih itibariyle hukuki i\u015flem ehliyetine sahip olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespit edilmesi; eldeki davada vasiyetnamenin iptali ko\u015fullar\u0131 mevcut de\u011fil ise, davac\u0131n\u0131n tenkis talebinin de\u011ferlendirilmesi, bu de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131l\u0131rken de yukar\u0131da ifade edilen ilke ve esaslara g\u00f6re alan\u0131nda uzman bilirki\u015fi yada bilirki\u015filer taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen taraf ve Yarg\u0131tay denetimine elveri\u015fli raporlar al\u0131nmak suretiyle h\u00fck\u00fcm tesisi yoluna gidilmesi gerekirken; eksik inceleme ve yan\u0131lg\u0131l\u0131 de\u011ferlendirme ile yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm tesisi do\u011fru g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f, bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>SONU\u00c7: Yukar\u0131da birinci bentte a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle davac\u0131 &#8230;&#8217;n\u0131n sair temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddine, ikinci ve \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc bentte a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle h\u00fckm\u00fcn HUMK.nun 428. maddesi gere\u011fince davac\u0131 &#8230; yarar\u0131na BOZULMASINA ve pe\u015fin al\u0131nan temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131n istek halinde temyiz edene iadesine, 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK&#8217;nun ge\u00e7ici madde 3 atf\u0131yla 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 HUMK.nun 440.maddesi gere\u011fince karar\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren 15 g\u00fcnl\u00fck s\u00fcre i\u00e7erisinde karar d\u00fczeltme yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere, 04.06.2018 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p>\u200bYarg\u0131tay 3. Hukuk Dairesi&#8217;nin 04.06.2018 tarihli, 2018\/3204 E., 2018\/6267 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n<p>Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 3. Hukuk Dairesi 2018\/3204 E., 2018\/6267 K. &#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221; MAHKEMES\u0130 : ASL\u0130YE HUKUK MAHKEMES\u0130 Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki vasiyetnamenin iptali-tenkis davas\u0131n\u0131n mahkemece yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 sonucunda, davan\u0131n reddine y\u00f6nelik olarak verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn, s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde davac\u0131 &#8230; taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine; temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin kabul\u00fcne karar verildikten sonra, dosya i\u00e7erisindeki ka\u011f\u0131tlar okunup gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: Y A R G I T A Y K A R A R I Davac\u0131lar; daval\u0131 ile karde\u015f olduklar\u0131n\u0131, muris babalar\u0131 &#8230;&#8217;un vefat\u0131ndan \u00f6nce vasiyetname d\u00fczenleyerek de\u011ferli olarak be\u015f adet ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n\u0131 daval\u0131ya vasiyet etti\u011fini, ekonomik k\u0131ymet i\u00e7ermeyen d\u00f6rt adet ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131 da kendilerine b\u0131rakt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n tamam\u0131n\u0131n tapusuz oldu\u011funu, murisin amac\u0131n\u0131n vasiyetname yoluyla kendilerinden mal ka\u00e7\u0131rmak oldu\u011funu, yasal miras haklar\u0131n\u0131n tecav\u00fcze u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ayr\u0131ca murisin vasiyetname tarihinde hukuki i\u015flem ehliyetine sahip olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrerek, murise ait, &#8230; Noterli\u011fi&#8217;nce d\u00fczenlenen 29\/08\/2003 tarih ve 3797 yevmiye nolu vasiyetnamenin iptaline iptaline, mahkeme aksi kanaatte ise davac\u0131lar\u0131n mahfuz hisselerini a\u015fan vasiyetnamenin tenkisine karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015flerdir. Daval\u0131, davac\u0131lar\u0131n iddialar\u0131n\u0131n do\u011fru olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, babas\u0131na sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131nda kendisinin bakt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, babas\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fczenlemi\u015f oldu\u011fu vasiyetname ile ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 aras\u0131nda payla\u015ft\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek, davan\u0131n reddini dilemi\u015ftir. Mahkemece, dava konusu vasiyetnamenin kanunun arad\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015fekil \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve murisin vasiyetname d\u00fczenledi\u011fi anda hukuksal i\u015flem yapma ehliyetine sahip oldu\u011fu, bu nedenle vasiyetnamenin iptalini gerektirecek bir nedenin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, &hellip;<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-112945","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.6 (Yoast SEO v27.1.1) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Yarg\u0131tay 3. Hukuk Dairesi&#039;nin 2018\/3204 E., 2018\/6267 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-3-hukuk-dairesinin-2018-3204-e-2018-6267-k-sayili-karari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"uk_UA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Yarg\u0131tay 3. Hukuk Dairesi&#039;nin 2018\/3204 E., 2018\/6267 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 3. Hukuk Dairesi 2018\/3204 E., 2018\/6267 K. &#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221; MAHKEMES\u0130 : ASL\u0130YE HUKUK MAHKEMES\u0130 Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki vasiyetnamenin iptali-tenkis davas\u0131n\u0131n mahkemece yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 sonucunda, davan\u0131n reddine y\u00f6nelik olarak verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn, s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde davac\u0131 &#8230; taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine; temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin kabul\u00fcne karar verildikten sonra, dosya i\u00e7erisindeki ka\u011f\u0131tlar okunup gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: Y A R G I T A Y K A R A R I Davac\u0131lar; daval\u0131 ile karde\u015f olduklar\u0131n\u0131, muris babalar\u0131 &#8230;&#8217;un vefat\u0131ndan \u00f6nce vasiyetname d\u00fczenleyerek de\u011ferli olarak be\u015f adet ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n\u0131 daval\u0131ya vasiyet etti\u011fini, ekonomik k\u0131ymet i\u00e7ermeyen d\u00f6rt adet ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131 da kendilerine b\u0131rakt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n tamam\u0131n\u0131n tapusuz oldu\u011funu, murisin amac\u0131n\u0131n vasiyetname yoluyla kendilerinden mal ka\u00e7\u0131rmak oldu\u011funu, yasal miras haklar\u0131n\u0131n tecav\u00fcze u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ayr\u0131ca murisin vasiyetname tarihinde hukuki i\u015flem ehliyetine sahip olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrerek, murise ait, &#8230; Noterli\u011fi&#8217;nce d\u00fczenlenen 29\/08\/2003 tarih ve 3797 yevmiye nolu vasiyetnamenin iptaline iptaline, mahkeme aksi kanaatte ise davac\u0131lar\u0131n mahfuz hisselerini a\u015fan vasiyetnamenin tenkisine karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015flerdir. Daval\u0131, davac\u0131lar\u0131n iddialar\u0131n\u0131n do\u011fru olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, babas\u0131na sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131nda kendisinin bakt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, babas\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fczenlemi\u015f oldu\u011fu vasiyetname ile ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 aras\u0131nda payla\u015ft\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek, davan\u0131n reddini dilemi\u015ftir. Mahkemece, dava konusu vasiyetnamenin kanunun arad\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015fekil \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve murisin vasiyetname d\u00fczenledi\u011fi anda hukuksal i\u015flem yapma ehliyetine sahip oldu\u011fu, bu nedenle vasiyetnamenin iptalini gerektirecek bir nedenin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, &hellip;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-3-hukuk-dairesinin-2018-3204-e-2018-6267-k-sayili-karari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-06-10T21:09:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u043e\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u0431\u043b. \u0447\u0430\u0441 \u0447\u0438\u0442\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 \u0445\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0438\u043d\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-3-hukuk-dairesinin-2018-3204-e-2018-6267-k-sayili-karari\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-3-hukuk-dairesinin-2018-3204-e-2018-6267-k-sayili-karari\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\"},\"headline\":\"Yarg\u0131tay 3. Hukuk Dairesi&#8217;nin 2018\/3204 E., 2018\/6267 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-06-10T21:09:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-3-hukuk-dairesinin-2018-3204-e-2018-6267-k-sayili-karari\/\"},\"wordCount\":1790,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Hukuki Haberler\"],\"inLanguage\":\"uk\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-3-hukuk-dairesinin-2018-3204-e-2018-6267-k-sayili-karari\/\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-3-hukuk-dairesinin-2018-3204-e-2018-6267-k-sayili-karari\/\",\"name\":\"Yarg\u0131tay 3. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2018\/3204 E., 2018\/6267 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2025-06-10T21:09:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-3-hukuk-dairesinin-2018-3204-e-2018-6267-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"uk\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-3-hukuk-dairesinin-2018-3204-e-2018-6267-k-sayili-karari\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-3-hukuk-dairesinin-2018-3204-e-2018-6267-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Yarg\u0131tay 3. Hukuk Dairesi&#8217;nin 2018\/3204 E., 2018\/6267 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"description\":\"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"uk\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"uk\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"width\":1080,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\",\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"uk\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net\"],\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/author\/hukukihabernet\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Yarg\u0131tay 3. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2018\/3204 E., 2018\/6267 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-3-hukuk-dairesinin-2018-3204-e-2018-6267-k-sayili-karari\/","og_locale":"uk_UA","og_type":"article","og_title":"Yarg\u0131tay 3. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2018\/3204 E., 2018\/6267 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131","og_description":"T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 3. Hukuk Dairesi 2018\/3204 E., 2018\/6267 K. &#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221; MAHKEMES\u0130 : ASL\u0130YE HUKUK MAHKEMES\u0130 Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki vasiyetnamenin iptali-tenkis davas\u0131n\u0131n mahkemece yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 sonucunda, davan\u0131n reddine y\u00f6nelik olarak verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn, s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde davac\u0131 &#8230; taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine; temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin kabul\u00fcne karar verildikten sonra, dosya i\u00e7erisindeki ka\u011f\u0131tlar okunup gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: Y A R G I T A Y K A R A R I Davac\u0131lar; daval\u0131 ile karde\u015f olduklar\u0131n\u0131, muris babalar\u0131 &#8230;&#8217;un vefat\u0131ndan \u00f6nce vasiyetname d\u00fczenleyerek de\u011ferli olarak be\u015f adet ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n\u0131 daval\u0131ya vasiyet etti\u011fini, ekonomik k\u0131ymet i\u00e7ermeyen d\u00f6rt adet ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131 da kendilerine b\u0131rakt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n tamam\u0131n\u0131n tapusuz oldu\u011funu, murisin amac\u0131n\u0131n vasiyetname yoluyla kendilerinden mal ka\u00e7\u0131rmak oldu\u011funu, yasal miras haklar\u0131n\u0131n tecav\u00fcze u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ayr\u0131ca murisin vasiyetname tarihinde hukuki i\u015flem ehliyetine sahip olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrerek, murise ait, &#8230; Noterli\u011fi&#8217;nce d\u00fczenlenen 29\/08\/2003 tarih ve 3797 yevmiye nolu vasiyetnamenin iptaline iptaline, mahkeme aksi kanaatte ise davac\u0131lar\u0131n mahfuz hisselerini a\u015fan vasiyetnamenin tenkisine karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015flerdir. Daval\u0131, davac\u0131lar\u0131n iddialar\u0131n\u0131n do\u011fru olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, babas\u0131na sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131nda kendisinin bakt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, babas\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fczenlemi\u015f oldu\u011fu vasiyetname ile ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 aras\u0131nda payla\u015ft\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek, davan\u0131n reddini dilemi\u015ftir. Mahkemece, dava konusu vasiyetnamenin kanunun arad\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015fekil \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve murisin vasiyetname d\u00fczenledi\u011fi anda hukuksal i\u015flem yapma ehliyetine sahip oldu\u011fu, bu nedenle vasiyetnamenin iptalini gerektirecek bir nedenin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, &hellip;","og_url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-3-hukuk-dairesinin-2018-3204-e-2018-6267-k-sayili-karari\/","og_site_name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","article_published_time":"2025-06-10T21:09:00+00:00","author":"Hukuki Haber.net","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u043e":"Hukuki Haber.net","\u041f\u0440\u0438\u0431\u043b. \u0447\u0430\u0441 \u0447\u0438\u0442\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044f":"9 \u0445\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0438\u043d"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-3-hukuk-dairesinin-2018-3204-e-2018-6267-k-sayili-karari\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-3-hukuk-dairesinin-2018-3204-e-2018-6267-k-sayili-karari\/"},"author":{"name":"Hukuki Haber.net","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822"},"headline":"Yarg\u0131tay 3. Hukuk Dairesi&#8217;nin 2018\/3204 E., 2018\/6267 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131","datePublished":"2025-06-10T21:09:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-3-hukuk-dairesinin-2018-3204-e-2018-6267-k-sayili-karari\/"},"wordCount":1790,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Hukuki Haberler"],"inLanguage":"uk"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-3-hukuk-dairesinin-2018-3204-e-2018-6267-k-sayili-karari\/","url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-3-hukuk-dairesinin-2018-3204-e-2018-6267-k-sayili-karari\/","name":"Yarg\u0131tay 3. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2018\/3204 E., 2018\/6267 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-06-10T21:09:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-3-hukuk-dairesinin-2018-3204-e-2018-6267-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"uk","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-3-hukuk-dairesinin-2018-3204-e-2018-6267-k-sayili-karari\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-3-hukuk-dairesinin-2018-3204-e-2018-6267-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Yarg\u0131tay 3. Hukuk Dairesi&#8217;nin 2018\/3204 E., 2018\/6267 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","description":"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"uk"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"uk","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","contentUrl":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","width":1080,"height":1080,"caption":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822","name":"Hukuki Haber.net","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"uk","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Hukuki Haber.net"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net"],"url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/author\/hukukihabernet\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/112945","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=112945"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/112945\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=112945"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=112945"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=112945"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}