T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
H.S. BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2023\/18937)<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 7\/1\/2025<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Recai AKYEL<\/p>\n
Selahaddin MENTE\u015e<\/p>\n
Muhterem \u0130NCE<\/p>\n
Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Yusuf Enes KAYA<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Nesrin \u00d6ZT\u00dcRK<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN KONUSU<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru; yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 yapan mahkemelerin ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z ve tarafs\u0131z olmamas\u0131 nedeniyle ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z ve tarafs\u0131z mahkemede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n, tutuklulu\u011fun kanunda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen azami s\u00fcreyi ve makul s\u00fcreyi a\u015fmas\u0131, mahk\u00fbmiyete ba\u011fl\u0131 tutuklaman\u0131n hukuki olmamas\u0131 nedeniyle de ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
II. BA\u015eVURU S\u00dcREC\u0130<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvuru 15\/3\/2023 tarihinde yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Komisyon, ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fvuru belgelerinin bir \u00f6rne\u011fi bilgi i\u00e7in Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6nderilmi\u015ftir. Bakanl\u0131k, g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc bildirmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
III. OLAY VE OLGULAR <\/p>\n
4. Ba\u015fvuru formu ve eklerinde ifade edildi\u011fi \u015fekliyle ilgili olaylar \u00f6zetle \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucu; U\u015fak Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) anayasal d\u00fczeni ortadan kald\u0131rmaya te\u015febb\u00fcs etme, silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc kurma veya y\u00f6netme ve 7\/2\/2013 tarihli ve 6415 say\u0131l\u0131 Ter\u00f6rizmin Finansman\u0131n\u0131n \u00d6nlenmesi Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’a muhalefet su\u00e7lamalar\u0131yla 20\/10\/2015 tarihinde g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. U\u015fak Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011finin 21\/10\/2015 tarihli karar\u0131yla da tutuklanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
6. U\u015fak 2. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinde yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonucu 12\/2\/2019 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucu, Fetullah\u00e7\u0131 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc\/Paralel Devlet Yap\u0131lanmas\u0131na (FET\u00d6\/PDY) \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan 15 y\u0131l hapis cezas\u0131na mahk\u00fbm edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, karara kar\u015f\u0131 istinaf kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
7. \u0130zmir B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 2. Ceza Dairesi 11\/12\/2019 tarihinde bozma karar\u0131 vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. Bozma \u00fczerine U\u015fak 2. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinde devam eden yarg\u0131lamada ba\u015fvurucu, tutuklu olarak yarg\u0131lanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Yarg\u0131lama sonucunda 10\/7\/2020 tarihinde silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc y\u00f6neticili\u011fi su\u00e7undan ba\u015fvurucunun 18 y\u0131l mahk\u00fbmiyetine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, karara kar\u015f\u0131 istinaf kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
9. B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi ba\u015fvurucunun istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun esastan reddine karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
10. Temyiz ba\u015fvurusu \u00fczerine dosyay\u0131 inceleyen Yarg\u0131tay 3. Ceza Dairesi, 21\/3\/2022 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131ndaki mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn bozulmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
11. Bozma \u00fczerine U\u015fak 2. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinde devam eden yarg\u0131lamada ba\u015fvurucunun tutuklu olarak yarg\u0131lamas\u0131na devam edilmi\u015ftir. 31\/10\/2022 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucu, FET\u00d6\/PDY \u00fcyeli\u011finden 12 y\u0131l hapis cezas\u0131yla cezaland\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u00d6te yandan mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131yla birlikte ba\u015fvurucunun tutukluluk h\u00e2linin devam\u0131na da karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
12. Ba\u015fvurucu 3\/11\/2022 tarihinde tutuklulu\u011funun devam\u0131 karar\u0131na itiraz etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
13. Di\u011fer yandan mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7esi 4\/1\/2023 tarihinde a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015f ve dosya 28\/3\/2023 tarihinde Yarg\u0131taya temyiz incelemesi yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere g\u00f6nderilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
14. Ba\u015fvurucunun tutuklulu\u011funun devam\u0131na itiraz\u0131 U\u015fak 2. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesince 6\/1\/2023 tarihinde incelenmi\u015f ve karar\u0131n yerinde oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle reddedilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucunun itiraz\u0131,incelenmek \u00fczere itiraz merciine g\u00f6nderilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
15. 19\/1\/2023 tarihinde U\u015fak 3. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi itiraz\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucunun \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan azami tutukluluk s\u00fcresinin yedi y\u0131l oldu\u011fu, yedi y\u0131l\u0131 a\u015fk\u0131n s\u00fcredir tutuklu bulundu\u011fu g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda tutuklama tedbirinin devam\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fc olmayaca\u011f\u0131 ifade edilmi\u015f ve yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131na \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f yasa\u011f\u0131 ile belirli g\u00fcnlerde imza atma \u015fart\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucunun tahliyesine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Kararda, itiraz yolunun a\u00e7\u0131k oldu\u011fu belirtilmi\u015f ve itiraz mercii olarak U\u015fak 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi g\u00f6sterilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
16. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, ba\u015fvurucunun ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 ceza miktar\u0131 itibar\u0131yla ka\u00e7ma \u015f\u00fcphesi bulundu\u011funu ve silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7unun katalog su\u00e7lardan oldu\u011funu belirterek tahliye karar\u0131na ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn itirazda bulunmak suretiyle U\u015fak 3. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinden karar\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 ve ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda tutuklamaya y\u00f6nelik yakalama emri d\u00fczenlenmesini, Mahkeme aksi kanaatte ise itiraz\u0131n incelenmek \u00fczere merciine g\u00f6nderilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
17. U\u015fak Adliyesi Adalet Komisyonu Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 20\/1\/2023 tarihinde n\u00f6bet\u00e7i mahkeme heyetinde \u00fcye h\u00e2kim olarak bulunan U\u015fak 2. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi h\u00e2kimininba\u015fvurucunun mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131nda yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle itiraz\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmek \u00fczere yerine yeni bir \u00fcye h\u00e2kim g\u00f6revlendirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
18. \u00d6te yandan ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k; ba\u015fvurucunun sabit g\u00f6r\u00fclen eyleminin katalog su\u00e7lardan olmas\u0131, ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 ceza miktar\u0131 itibar\u0131yla ka\u00e7ma \u015f\u00fcphesinin bulunmas\u0131 ve tutuklulukta ge\u00e7irdi\u011fi varsay\u0131lan s\u00fcreye istinaf ve Yarg\u0131tay incelemelerinde ge\u00e7en s\u00fcrenin d\u00e2hil olmamas\u0131 nedeniyle U\u015fak 2. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinden ba\u015fvurucunun tutuklanmas\u0131 talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
19. U\u015fak 2. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi, Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n tahliye karar\u0131na itiraz\u0131n\u0131 ve tutuklama talebini birlikte de\u011ferlendirmi\u015ftir. 20\/1\/2023 tarihinde Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc tutuklama nedenlerini yerinde g\u00f6rerek ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn ba\u015fvurucunun tutuklanmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. Karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinin ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki \u015fekildedir:<\/p>\n
“… Mahkememizin h\u00fck\u00fcm \u00f6zl\u00fc olarak tutukluluk halinin devam\u0131na karar verildi\u011fi san\u0131k H. S.’nin U\u015fak 3. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi’nin 2023\/41 De\u011fi\u015fik i\u015f say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile tahliye edilmesi, tahliye karar\u0131na itiraz edilmesi, ayr\u0131ca U\u015fak Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca CMK’nun 100.maddesi gere\u011fince tutuklanmas\u0131 talebinde bulunulmas\u0131 \u00fczerine resen \u2026 celse a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131. <\/p>\n
…<\/p>\n
San\u0131k H.S.’nin \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7unun vas\u0131f ve mahiyeti, alm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu ceza miktar\u0131,san\u0131\u011f\u0131n tutuklu kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcre itibariyle istinaf incelemesi ve Yarg\u0131tay incelemesinden ge\u00e7en s\u00fcrenin CMK’nun 102\/2.maddesinde belirtilen 5 y\u0131ll\u0131k s\u00fcreye tabi olmamas\u0131, daha \u00f6nce U\u015fak 2. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesince h\u00fck\u00fcmle birlikte san\u0131\u011f\u0131n tutukluluk halinin devam\u0131na karar verilmi\u015f olup tutuklama nedenlerinde her hangi bir de\u011fi\u015fiklik bulunmamas\u0131, at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7un CMK’nun 100\/3 maddesinde say\u0131lan tutuklama sebebinin varsay\u0131labilece\u011fi katalog su\u00e7lardan olmas\u0131, dosyan\u0131n daha \u00f6nce Yarg\u0131tay ve \u0130stinaf incelemesinden ge\u00e7mesine ra\u011fmen tutuklulu\u011fun de\u011ferlendirilerek devam\u0131na karar verilmi\u015f olmas\u0131, ayr\u0131ca mahkum oldu\u011fu ceza miktar\u0131 itibariyle adli kontrol\u00fcn \u015fu a\u015famada yetersiz kalaca\u011f\u0131 ve tutuklama tedbirinin \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fc oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmakla san\u0131\u011f\u0131n CMK’ nun 100 ve devam\u0131 maddeleri uyar\u0131nca ve \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan tutuklanmas\u0131na\u2026 [karar verildi.]”<\/p>\n
20. Tutuklama karar\u0131na ba\u015fvurucunun yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz U\u015fak 2. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan 26\/1\/2023 tarihinde reddedilmi\u015ftir. Dosya incelenmek \u00fczere itiraz merciine g\u00f6nderilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
21. \u0130tiraz mercii olan U\u015fak 3. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi 8\/2\/2023 tarihinde itiraz\u0131n reddine karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
22. Ba\u015fvurucu 15\/3\/2023 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
23. \u00d6te yandan ba\u015fvurucu, 2\/12\/2022 tarihinde koruma tedbiri nedeniyle tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu, hakk\u0131ndaki ilk tutuklama ile tutuklulu\u011funun devam\u0131na ili\u015fkin kararlar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esiz oldu\u011fundan ve tutukluluk s\u00fcresinin kanunda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen azami s\u00fcre olan yedi y\u0131l\u0131 a\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan \u015fik\u00e2yet etmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucunun a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 tazminat davas\u0131n\u0131n kanun yolu incelemesi devam etmektedir.<\/p>\n
24. Yarg\u0131tay 3. Ceza Dairesi 5\/2\/2024 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda verilen mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fc onam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
IV. \u0130NCELEME VE GEREK\u00c7E<\/p>\n
25. Anayasa Mahkemesinin 7\/1\/2025 tarihinde yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu toplant\u0131da ba\u015fvuru incelenip gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n
A. Ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z ve Tarafs\u0131z Mahkemede Yarg\u0131lanma Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvurucunun \u0130ddialar\u0131<\/p>\n
26. Ba\u015fvurucu; ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z mahkemelere ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcm yok say\u0131larak ve kanuni h\u00e2kim g\u00fcvencesi ihlal edilmek suretiyle, \u00f6zel yetkili k\u0131l\u0131nm\u0131\u015f ve kendini hukukun \u00fcst\u00fcnde g\u00f6ren, kanunu yok sayan uygulamalar i\u00e7eren bir yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecinde mahk\u00fbm edildi\u011fini belirterek adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
2. De\u011ferlendirme<\/p>\n
27. Mahkemelerin tarafs\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n birbirini tamamlayan iki unsur oldu\u011fu nazara al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda -Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ilkesi gere\u011fi- Anayasa’n\u0131n 138., 139. ve 140. maddeleri de ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z ve tarafs\u0131z mahkemede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesinde g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurulmal\u0131d\u0131r (AYM, E.2005\/55, K.2006\/4, 5\/1\/2006; E.1992\/39, K.1993\/19, 29\/4\/1993).<\/p>\n
28. Bir mahkemenin ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesinde \u00fcyelerinin atanma \u015fekli ve g\u00f6rev s\u00fcreleri, h\u00e2kimlik teminat\u0131 ve ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z olduklar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcmleri \u00f6nem arz etmektedir. Mahkemenin tarafs\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ise uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fc etkileyecek bir \u00f6n yarg\u0131, tarafgirlik, menfaate sahip olunmamas\u0131 ile taraflar\u0131n leh ve aleyhlerinde bir d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnceye sahip olunmamas\u0131n\u0131 ifade eder. Tarafs\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00f6znel ve nesnel olmak \u00fczere iki boyutu bulunmakta olup bu kapsamda h\u00e2kimin birey olarak mevcut davadaki ki\u015fisel tarafs\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n yan\u0131 s\u0131ra kurum olarak mahkemenin ki\u015fide b\u0131rakt\u0131\u011f\u0131 izlenimin de dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekmektedir (Hikmet Kopar ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2014\/14061, 8\/4\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 109, 110).<\/p>\n
29. Somut olayda ba\u015fvurucu, ba\u015fvuruya konu yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 yapan mahkemelerin ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve tarafs\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ihlal eden hususlar\u0131 ya da kendisine isnat edilen ve derece mahkemesince sabit g\u00f6r\u00fclen fiillerle ilgili ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen i\u015flemlerin s\u0131hhatini ne \u015fekilde etkiledi\u011fine ili\u015fkin somut herhangi bir a\u00e7\u0131klama yapmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu, soyut ve genel ifadelerle ba\u015fvuru konusu yarg\u0131lamayla herhangi bir ba\u011f kurmadan bu iddias\u0131n\u0131 dile getirmi\u015ftir. Sonu\u00e7 olarak ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z ve tarafs\u0131z mahkemede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131na y\u00f6nelik olarak bir ihlalin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
30. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurunun bu k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
B. Ki\u015fi H\u00fcrriyeti ve G\u00fcvenli\u011fi Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddialar<\/p>\n
1. Tutuklulu\u011fun Kanunda \u00d6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen Azami S\u00fcreyi ve Makul S\u00fcreyi A\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131na \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
a. Ba\u015fvurucunun \u0130ddialar\u0131 ve Bakanl\u0131k G\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc<\/p>\n
31. Ba\u015fvurucu, azami tutukluluk s\u00fcresinin hesab\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131k kanun h\u00fckm\u00fc olan 4\/12\/2004 tarihli ve 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu\u2019nun 102. maddesinin uygulanmamas\u0131 nedeniyle su\u00e7 ve cezalar\u0131n kanunili\u011fi ilkesinin ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
32. Ba\u015fvurucu; temyiz ve istinaf a\u015famas\u0131nda ge\u00e7en s\u00fcrenin tutukluluk s\u00fcresinin hesab\u0131na d\u00e2hil edilmemesinin 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019a ve 53. maddesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu, tutuklulu\u011funun kanunda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen azami s\u00fcreyi a\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, tutukluluk s\u00fcresinin makul olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
33. Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde; ba\u015fvurucunun tutukluluk s\u00fcresinin 5 y\u0131l 3 ay 29 g\u00fcn oldu\u011fu; bu tespitin yap\u0131lacak incelemede g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
34. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyan\u0131nda istinaf ve temyiz a\u015famas\u0131nda ge\u00e7en s\u00fcrenin de tutukluluk s\u00fcresine d\u00e2hil edilmesi gerekti\u011fini, bu nedenle tutukluluk s\u00fcresinin kanunda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen azami 7 y\u0131ll\u0131k s\u00fcreyi a\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
b. De\u011ferlendirme<\/p>\n
35. Anayasa Mahkemesi su\u00e7 soru\u015fturmas\u0131 ve kovu\u015fturmas\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda uygulanan koruma tedbirleriyle ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131yla yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvurularda bir\u00e7ok \u015fik\u00e2yet t\u00fcr\u00fc bak\u0131m\u0131ndan 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 141. maddesinde yer alan tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7ma imk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131n bireysel ba\u015fvuru \u00f6ncesinde t\u00fcketilmesi gereken etkili bir ba\u015fvuru yolu oldu\u011funu ifade etmi\u015ftir. Bu kapsamda Anayasa Mahkemesi; tutuklulu\u011fun kanunda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen azami s\u00fcreyi a\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 veya tutukluluk s\u00fcresinin makul olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddialar\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurunun incelendi\u011fi tarih itibar\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucunun su\u00e7 isnad\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak tutulmas\u0131n\u0131n sona erip ermedi\u011finin \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna ula\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucunun tahliyesine karar verilmesi ya da ilk derece mahkemesince mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc verilerek tutulman\u0131n niteli\u011finin de\u011fi\u015fmesi (h\u00fckme ba\u011fl\u0131 h\u00e2le gelmesi) durumunda an\u0131lan tazminat davas\u0131 yolu, Anayasa Mahkemesine g\u00f6re bireysel ba\u015fvuru \u00f6ncesinde t\u00fcketilmesi gereken bir yoldur (Erkam Abdurrahman Ak, B. No: 2014\/8515, 28\/9\/2016, \u00a7\u00a7 48-62; \u0130rfan Ger\u00e7ek, B. No: 2014\/6500, 29\/9\/2016, \u00a7\u00a7 33-45; Ahmet Kubilay Tezcan, B. No: 2014\/3473, 25\/1\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 24-27; Ekrem At\u0131c\u0131, B. No: 2014\/15609, 8\/3\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 27-30). Somut olayda 31\/10\/2022 tarihinde mahk\u00fbmiyetine karar verilen ba\u015fvurucu y\u00f6n\u00fcnden an\u0131lan kararlardan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren bir durumun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Nitekim ba\u015fvurucunun bu \u015fik\u00e2yet kapsam\u0131nda a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 tazminat davas\u0131 derdesttir.<\/p>\n
36. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurunun bu k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
2. Mahk\u00fbmiyete Ba\u011fl\u0131 Tutuklaman\u0131n Hukuki Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
a. Ba\u015fvurucunun \u0130ddialar\u0131 ve Bakanl\u0131k G\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc<\/p>\n
37. Ba\u015fvurucu 31\/10\/2022 tarihli tutuklulu\u011fun devam\u0131 karar\u0131na yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraza ili\u015fkin incelemenin yasal s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131,tutuklulu\u011fun devam\u0131 karar\u0131na itiraz\u0131 \u00fczerine U\u015fak 3. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin verdi\u011fi karar\u0131 kesin olarak vermesi gerekirken itiraz yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere verdi\u011fini, tahliye karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n itiraz yetkisinin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n h\u00fck\u00fcm vererek dosyadan el \u00e7ekmi\u015f olan U\u015fak 2. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinden tutuklama talep etmesine ve bu Mahkemece tutuklama karar\u0131 verilmesine imk\u00e2n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, tahliye karar\u0131 verilmesi sonras\u0131ndaki t\u00fcm i\u015flemlerin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 ve kanuni dayanaktan yoksun oldu\u011funu, hakk\u0131ndaki tahliye karar\u0131n\u0131n yerine getirilmeden tekrar tutuklanmas\u0131 nedeniyle hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir \u015fekilde \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden mahrum b\u0131rak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n, ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Ba\u015fvurucu ayr\u0131ca hakk\u0131nda tahliye karar\u0131 verilmesine ra\u011fmen bu karar\u0131n uygulanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, tahliye karar\u0131n\u0131n uygulanmamas\u0131 talimat\u0131n\u0131 veren ki\u015filerin su\u00e7 i\u015fledi\u011fini, bu suretle kanunsuz emir h\u00fck\u00fcmlerini d\u00fczenleyen Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 137. maddesinin ihlal edildi\u011fini iddia etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
38. Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde, Anayasa Mahkemesinin verdi\u011fi baz\u0131 kararlara ve derece mahkemelerinin gerek\u00e7elerine yer verilmi\u015f; inceleme yap\u0131l\u0131rken Anayasa’n\u0131n ve mevzuat\u0131n ilgili h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin, Anayasa Mahkemesi i\u00e7tihad\u0131n\u0131n ve somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131n dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi ifade edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
39. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyan\u0131nda ba\u015fvuru formunda belirtti\u011fi iddialar\u0131n\u0131 tekrarlam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
b. De\u011ferlendirme<\/p>\n
40. Anayasa Mahkemesi tutuklamaya konu davan\u0131n kesinle\u015fmi\u015f olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n tutuklaman\u0131n hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu iddialar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik olarak \u00f6ncelikle 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 141. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (a) bendi kapsam\u0131nda tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7abileceklerini belirterek an\u0131lan iddialar\u0131 ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle kabul edilemez bulmaktad\u0131r (Re\u015fat Ertan, B. No: 2013\/5700, 15\/4\/2015, \u00a7 26; \u00d6mer K\u00f6se, B. No: 2014\/12036, 16\/11\/2016, \u00a7 34; Eyy\u00fcp G\u00fcne\u015f [GK], B. No: 2017\/28308, 21\/10\/2021, \u00a7 88; Murat A\u011f\u0131rel ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2020\/11655, 7\/4\/2022, \u00a7\u00a7 23-26). Somut ba\u015fvuruda da 5\/2\/2024 tarihli kesinle\u015fmi\u015f bir mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc bulundu\u011fundan ba\u015fvurucunun mezk\u00fbr iddialar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 141. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (a) bendinde d\u00fczenlenen tazminat yolunu t\u00fckettikten sonra bireysel ba\u015fvuru yapabilece\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir.<\/p>\n
41. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurunun bu k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
V. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. 1. Ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z ve tarafs\u0131z mahkemede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
2. Ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda tutuklulu\u011fun kanunda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen azami s\u00fcreyi ve makul s\u00fcreyi a\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
3. Ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda mahk\u00fbmiyete ba\u011fl\u0131 tutuklaman\u0131n hukuki olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. Yarg\u0131lama giderlerinin ba\u015fvurucu \u00fczerinde BIRAKILMASINA 7\/1\/2025 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 7\/1\/2025 tarihli ve 2023\/18937 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR H.S. BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2023\/18937) Karar Tarihi: 7\/1\/2025 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Recai AKYEL Selahaddin MENTE\u015e Muhterem \u0130NCE Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : Yusuf Enes KAYA Ba\u015fvurucu : Vekili : Av. Nesrin \u00d6ZT\u00dcRK I. BA\u015eVURUNUN KONUSU 1. Ba\u015fvuru; yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 yapan mahkemelerin ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z ve tarafs\u0131z olmamas\u0131 nedeniyle ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z ve tarafs\u0131z mahkemede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n, tutuklulu\u011fun kanunda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen azami s\u00fcreyi ve makul s\u00fcreyi a\u015fmas\u0131, mahk\u00fbmiyete ba\u011fl\u0131 tutuklaman\u0131n hukuki olmamas\u0131 nedeniyle de ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. II. BA\u015eVURU S\u00dcREC\u0130 2. Ba\u015fvuru 15\/3\/2023 tarihinde yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Komisyon, ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. 3. Ba\u015fvuru belgelerinin bir \u00f6rne\u011fi bilgi i\u00e7in Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6nderilmi\u015ftir. Bakanl\u0131k, g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc bildirmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmu\u015ftur. III. OLAY VE OLGULAR 4. Ba\u015fvuru formu ve eklerinde ifade edildi\u011fi \u015fekliyle ilgili olaylar \u00f6zetle \u015f\u00f6yledir: 5. Ba\u015fvurucu; U\u015fak Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) anayasal d\u00fczeni ortadan kald\u0131rmaya te\u015febb\u00fcs etme, silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc kurma veya y\u00f6netme ve 7\/2\/2013 tarihli ve 6415 say\u0131l\u0131 Ter\u00f6rizmin Finansman\u0131n\u0131n \u00d6nlenmesi Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’a muhalefet su\u00e7lamalar\u0131yla 20\/10\/2015 tarihinde g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. U\u015fak Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011finin 21\/10\/2015 tarihli karar\u0131yla da tutuklanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 6. U\u015fak 2. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinde yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonucu 12\/2\/2019 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucu, Fetullah\u00e7\u0131 …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-101750","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n