T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
HAYR\u0130 BORA BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/443)<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 10\/12\/2024<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Recai AKYEL<\/p>\n
Selahaddin MENTE\u015e<\/p>\n
Muhterem \u0130NCE<\/p>\n
Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6rler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
1.Ay\u015fe Didem \u00d6ZDEM\u0130R AKCA<\/p>\n
2. Gizem Ceren DEM\u0130R KO\u015eAR<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hayri BORA<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015filer taraf\u0131ndan silahl\u0131 tehdit ve \u015fiddete maruz kal\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak yap\u0131lan soru\u015fturman\u0131n etkili y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmemesi nedeniyle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvuru formu ve eklerinde ifade edildi\u011fi \u015fekliyle ilgili olaylar \u00f6zetle \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
i. Olay g\u00fcn\u00fc 14\/6\/2020 tarihinde sabah saatlerinde ba\u015fvurucu, evinin bah\u00e7esinde e\u015fi, k\u0131z\u0131, karde\u015fi ve karde\u015finin e\u015fiyle otururken 100 metre ileride oturan ve kavgal\u0131 oldu\u011fu a\u011fabeyinin o\u011flu M.B. y\u00fcksek sesle kendilerine k\u00fcfredip tehditte bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
ii. Ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn evin \u00f6n\u00fcne gelen M.B. silah (tabanca) ile havaya ate\u015f etmi\u015f, silahla ba\u015fvurucunun \u00fczerine y\u00fcr\u00fcm\u00fc\u015f, ba\u015fvurucunun g\u00f6\u011fs\u00fcne yumruk atm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu, d\u00fc\u015ferek dizinden yaralanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Eve ate\u015f eden M.B. kendisine m\u00fcdahale etmek isteyen ba\u015fvurucunun karde\u015fi T.B.nin \u00fczerine y\u00fcr\u00fcm\u00fc\u015f ve T.B.yi yumruklayarak ba\u015f\u0131ndan yaralam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
iii. Mermi kovanlar\u0131n\u0131 toplayan M.B. olay yerinden ayr\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. K\u0131z\u0131lcahamam Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) resen ba\u015flatt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda kolluk g\u00f6revlileri d\u00fczenledikleri 14\/6\/2020 tarihli Olay Tutana\u011f\u0131’nda, olay yeri olup ba\u015fvurucuya ait olan bah\u00e7e ve \u00e7evresinde yap\u0131lan incelemede ev ve sokak aras\u0131nda 9 mm \u00e7ap\u0131nda \u00fc\u00e7 bo\u015f kovan ve 9 mm \u00e7ap\u0131nda iki mermi bulundu\u011fu belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. K\u0131z\u0131lcahamam Devlet Hastanesinin 14\/6\/2020 tarihli ge\u00e7ici hekim raporunda ba\u015fvurucunun sol dizinde hassasiyet ve sol diz y\u00fczeyinde nokta \u015feklinde abrazyon bulundu\u011fu belirtilmi\u015ftir. Hastanenin 15\/6\/2020 tarihli kati raporunda, ba\u015fvurucunun sol dizinde 0,5 cm’lik, kurutlu (yara kabu\u011fu) dermabrazyon bulundu\u011fu, yaran\u0131n etkisinin basit t\u0131bbi m\u00fcdahale ile giderilebilece\u011fi tespiti yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
5. Olay\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi bina \u00fczerinde 7\/9\/2020 tarihinde mermi izi ara\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131 yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, bina \u00fczerinde iki mermi izi oldu\u011fu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclen ize rastlanm\u0131\u015f, duvar malzemesi oyularak yap\u0131lan ara\u015ft\u0131rmada ise mermi \u00e7ekirde\u011fine rastlanmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
6. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, M.B. hakk\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucu ve T.B.ye y\u00f6nelik silahla tehdit, ruhsats\u0131z ate\u015fli silahlarla mermileri sat\u0131n alma ya da ta\u015f\u0131ma veya bulundurma, konut dokunulmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ihlal etme ve hakaret su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan y\u00fcr\u00fctt\u00fc\u011f\u00fc soru\u015fturmada 7\/10\/2020 tarihinde yeterli delil bulunmamas\u0131 nedeniyle kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucunun karara itiraz\u0131 Ankara Bat\u0131 2. Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fince 28\/10\/2020 tarihinde reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. Ba\u015fvurucu, nihai karar\u0131 19\/11\/2020 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra 16\/12\/2020 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
8. Her iki ma\u011fdura y\u00f6nelik olarak \u015f\u00fcpheliye isnat olunan eylemler y\u00f6n\u00fcnden y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda ma\u011fdur T.B.nin kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karara itiraz\u0131 Ankara Bat\u0131 1. Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fince 9\/12\/2020 tarihinde k\u0131smen kabul edilmi\u015ftir. \u015e\u00fcpheli M.B. hakk\u0131nda resen soru\u015fturulan silahla tehdit, ruhsats\u0131z ate\u015fli silahlarla mermileri sat\u0131n alma ya da ta\u015f\u0131ma veya bulundurma su\u00e7lar\u0131 ile \u015fik\u00e2yete tabi su\u00e7lardan itiraz eden T.B.ye y\u00f6nelik konut dokunulmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ihlal etme, hakaret su\u00e7lar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ek kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karar M.B. hakk\u0131nda kamu davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in kald\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
9. Yeniden y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturma neticesinde M.B. hakk\u0131nda kamu davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f; 4\/11\/2021 tarihinde basit yaralama, hakaret ve konut dokunulmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ihlal su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan \u015fik\u00e2yetten vazge\u00e7me nedeniyle d\u00fc\u015fme karar\u0131 verilmi\u015ftir. Silahla tehdit ile 10\/7\/1953 tarihli ve 6136 say\u0131l\u0131 Ate\u015fli Silahlar ve B\u0131\u00e7aklar ile Di\u011fer Aletler Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’a muhalefet su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan verilen hapis ve adli para cezas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
10. Ba\u015fvurucuya y\u00f6nelik basit yaralama su\u00e7u y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ise uzla\u015fma i\u015flemleri ba\u015flat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, ba\u015fvurucu ile \u015f\u00fcpheli M.B.nin uzla\u015fmas\u0131 nedeniyle 12\/4\/2021 tarihinde kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
11. Komisyonca, ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
12. Ba\u015fvurucu; kendisine y\u00f6nelik silahla tehdit, fiziksel ve s\u00f6zl\u00fc \u015fiddet eylemi hakk\u0131nda etkili ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmemesi nedeniyle anayasal haklar\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011finden \u015fik\u00e2yet etmi\u015ftir. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde; Anayasa ve ilgili mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin, Anayasa Mahkemesi i\u00e7tihad\u0131 ve somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi bildirilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
13. Bir muamelenin Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n kapsam\u0131na girebilmesi, asgari bir a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131k derecesine (ciddiyet seviyesine) ula\u015fmas\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r. Asgari a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131k derecesine ula\u015f\u0131l\u0131p ula\u015f\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6recelidir ve somut olay\u0131n ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesiyle belirlenir. Yap\u0131lacak de\u011ferlendirmede muamelenin s\u00fcresi, fiziksel ve ruhsal etkileri ile ma\u011fdurun cinsiyeti, ya\u015f\u0131 ve sa\u011fl\u0131k durumu gibi etkenler \u00f6nemlidir. Bu etkenlere ard\u0131ndaki kas\u0131t veya saik ile birlikte muamelenin amac\u0131 da eklenebilir. Ayr\u0131ca gerilimin ve duygular\u0131n y\u00fckseldi\u011fi atmosfer gibi muamelenin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ba\u011flam da dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gereken di\u011fer bir etkendir (Ali R\u0131za \u00d6zer ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2013\/3924, 6\/1\/2015, \u00a7 75; K.K. [GK], B. No: 2020\/34532, 29\/5\/2024, \u00a7 26).<\/p>\n
14. Ba\u015fvurucunun iddias\u0131na g\u00f6re M.B. \u00f6nce ba\u015fvurucu ile yan\u0131ndakilere k\u00fcfredip hakaretlerde bulunarak olay yerinden ayr\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ancak bir s\u00fcre sonra olay yerine gelip silahla tehdit edip ba\u015fvurucunun g\u00f6\u011fs\u00fcne yumrukla vurmu\u015ftur. Olay\u0131n belirli bir zaman dilimine yay\u0131lmas\u0131, tehditte ate\u015fli silah kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 ve M.B.nin eyleminin ba\u015fvurunun yaralanmas\u0131na neden olmas\u0131 birlikte de\u011ferlendirilerek ba\u015fvurucunun maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 eylemlerin Anayasa’n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131na girebilmesi i\u00e7in aranan asgari a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131k e\u015fi\u011fine ula\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir. Bu sebeple ba\u015fvuru, k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir. Bununla birlikte ba\u015fvurucuya y\u00f6nelik basit yaralama su\u00e7undan yap\u0131lan \u015fik\u00e2yetin uzla\u015fma ile sonu\u00e7land\u0131\u011f\u0131 dikkate al\u0131narak bu y\u00f6ndeki ihlal iddialar\u0131 inceleme kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda b\u0131rak\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
15. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
16. Devletin k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerinin usuli y\u00f6n\u00fc (usul y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc), savunulabilir nitelikteki her k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele olay\u0131n\u0131n sorumlular\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesini ve gerekiyorsa cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flayabilecek etkili bir soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fctmeyi gerektirir. Bu soru\u015fturman\u0131n temel amac\u0131, insan onurunu koruyan hukukun etkili bir \u015fekilde uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131 ve kamu g\u00f6revlilerinin veya di\u011fer bireylerin k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele niteli\u011findeki filleri nedeniyle hesap vermelerini sa\u011flamakt\u0131r. K\u00f6t\u00fc muamelenin kasten yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ileri s\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc durumlarda iddia hakk\u0131nda ivedilikle bir ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 ba\u015flat\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. Ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131n\u0131n Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin gerektirdi\u011fi \u015fekilde etkili oldu\u011funun kabul edilebilmesi i\u00e7in soru\u015fturmada olay\u0131 ayd\u0131nlatabilecek ve sorumlular\u0131n belirlenmesini sa\u011flayabilecek t\u00fcm deliller toplanmal\u0131d\u0131r. Dahas\u0131 soru\u015fturma s\u00fcreci gerekti\u011fi \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde kamu denetimine a\u00e7\u0131k olmal\u0131, ma\u011fdur soru\u015fturmaya etkili \u015fekilde kat\u0131labilmeli ve soru\u015fturmada makul bir \u00f6zen ve s\u00fcratle hareket edilmelidir. Yetkililer, soru\u015fturmay\u0131 sonland\u0131rmak i\u00e7in aceleci davranmamal\u0131 ve temelden yoksun sonu\u00e7lara dayanmamal\u0131d\u0131r (Tahir Canan, B. No: 2012\/969, 18\/9\/2013, \u00a7 25; Cezmi Demir ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2013\/293, 17\/7\/2014, \u00a7\u00a7 110-112, 114-117; Ali R\u0131za \u00d6zer ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7\u00a7 101-103).<\/p>\n
17. Ba\u015fvuruya konu olay\u0131n kamu makamlar\u0131nca \u00f6\u011frenilmesinin akabinde resen soru\u015fturma ba\u015flat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, olay yeri incelesi yap\u0131larak kovan ve mermi \u00e7ekirdeklerinin tespit edildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Buna kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k binada mermi izi olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin ara\u015ft\u0131rma olay tarihinden yakla\u015f\u0131k \u00fc\u00e7 ay sonra ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
18. Silahl\u0131 tehdit eylemini ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi ve ate\u015f etti\u011fi ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen \u015f\u00fcpheli M.B.nin evinde olay g\u00fcn\u00fc arama yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015fse de at\u0131\u015f art\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespiti i\u00e7in \u015f\u00fcpheliden \u00f6rnek al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak soru\u015fturma dosyas\u0131nda bir belge bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
19. Kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair kararda, olay yerinde bulunan t\u00fcm tan\u0131klar\u0131n m\u00fc\u015ftekilerin yak\u0131n akrabalar\u0131 olmas\u0131 nedeniyle beyanlar\u0131na itibar edilemeyece\u011fi de\u011ferlendirmesi yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015fsa da bu beyanlar\u0131n birbiriyle ve di\u011fer maddi delillerle uyumlu olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 konusunda bir de\u011ferlendirme yoktur. Bunun yan\u0131 s\u0131ra olaya ili\u015fkin ba\u015fka tan\u0131k olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, \u00e7evrede kay\u0131t alan kamera bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Nitekim soru\u015fturma sonucunda \u015f\u00fcpheli M.B.nin \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7lar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yeterli delilin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir. Olay yeri incelemesinde ele ge\u00e7irilen kovan ve mermiler sabit olmas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131n olas\u0131 bir \u015f\u00fcpheli tespiti i\u00e7in ara\u015ft\u0131rma yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u015fik\u00e2yete konu olaya ili\u015fkin maddi ger\u00e7ekle\u015fme ko\u015fullar\u0131 ayd\u0131nl\u0131\u011fa kavu\u015fturulmayarak olay\u0131n belirsiz b\u0131rak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
20. Soru\u015fturma s\u00fcreci bir b\u00fct\u00fcn h\u00e2linde de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde ba\u015fvurucunun \u015fik\u00e2yetine y\u00f6nelik etkili bir ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kanaatine var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Nitekim ayn\u0131 olay nedeniyle di\u011fer ma\u011fdur y\u00f6n\u00fcnden verilen kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karar\u0131n daha sonra kald\u0131r\u0131larak kamu davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 an\u0131lan tespiti g\u00fc\u00e7lendiren bir olgu olarak de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
21. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutunun ihlal edildi\u011fi sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M <\/p>\n
22. Ba\u015fvurucu, ihlalin tespiti ve yeniden soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmas\u0131 talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
23. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamda karar\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi soru\u015fturma mercilerinin yapmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden soru\u015fturma i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flatmak ve Anayasa Mahkemesini ihlal sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131ran nedenleri gideren, ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere uygun yeni bir karar vermektir (Mehmet Do\u011fan [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n
24. Ba\u015fvurucu, tazminat talebinde bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ihlalin tespiti ile yeniden soru\u015fturmaya karar verilmesiyle yetinilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. K\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutunun \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
C. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin ihlalin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere K\u0131z\u0131lcahamam Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Sor. No: 2020\/925) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. 446,90 TL har\u00e7tan olu\u015fan yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvurucuya \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. \u00d6demenin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
F. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin bilgi i\u00e7in Ankara Bat\u0131 2. Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fine (D. \u0130\u015f 2020\/4421) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
G. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 10\/12\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 10\/12\/2024 tarihli ve 2021\/443 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR HAYR\u0130 BORA BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/443) Karar Tarihi: 10\/12\/2024 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Recai AKYEL Selahaddin MENTE\u015e Muhterem \u0130NCE Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6rler : 1.Ay\u015fe Didem \u00d6ZDEM\u0130R AKCA 2. Gizem Ceren DEM\u0130R KO\u015eAR Ba\u015fvurucu : Hayri BORA I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015filer taraf\u0131ndan silahl\u0131 tehdit ve \u015fiddete maruz kal\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak yap\u0131lan soru\u015fturman\u0131n etkili y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmemesi nedeniyle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvuru formu ve eklerinde ifade edildi\u011fi \u015fekliyle ilgili olaylar \u00f6zetle \u015f\u00f6yledir: i. Olay g\u00fcn\u00fc 14\/6\/2020 tarihinde sabah saatlerinde ba\u015fvurucu, evinin bah\u00e7esinde e\u015fi, k\u0131z\u0131, karde\u015fi ve karde\u015finin e\u015fiyle otururken 100 metre ileride oturan ve kavgal\u0131 oldu\u011fu a\u011fabeyinin o\u011flu M.B. y\u00fcksek sesle kendilerine k\u00fcfredip tehditte bulunmu\u015ftur. ii. Ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn evin \u00f6n\u00fcne gelen M.B. silah (tabanca) ile havaya ate\u015f etmi\u015f, silahla ba\u015fvurucunun \u00fczerine y\u00fcr\u00fcm\u00fc\u015f, ba\u015fvurucunun g\u00f6\u011fs\u00fcne yumruk atm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu, d\u00fc\u015ferek dizinden yaralanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Eve ate\u015f eden M.B. kendisine m\u00fcdahale etmek isteyen ba\u015fvurucunun karde\u015fi T.B.nin \u00fczerine y\u00fcr\u00fcm\u00fc\u015f ve T.B.yi yumruklayarak ba\u015f\u0131ndan yaralam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. iii. Mermi kovanlar\u0131n\u0131 toplayan M.B. olay yerinden ayr\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 3. K\u0131z\u0131lcahamam Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) resen ba\u015flatt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda kolluk g\u00f6revlileri d\u00fczenledikleri 14\/6\/2020 tarihli Olay Tutana\u011f\u0131’nda, olay yeri olup ba\u015fvurucuya ait olan bah\u00e7e ve \u00e7evresinde …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-101749","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n