T.C.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay <\/p>\n
2. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n
2021\/3967 E., 2021\/5195 K.<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
MAHKEMES\u0130 : Samsun B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 4. Hukuk Dairesi
\nDAVA T\u00dcR\u00dc : Kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131 Bo\u015fanma-Ziynet Alaca\u011f\u0131<\/p>\n
Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki davan\u0131n yap\u0131lan muhakemesi sonunda b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesi hukuk dairesince verilen, yukar\u0131da tarihi ve numaras\u0131 g\u00f6sterilen h\u00fck\u00fcm davac\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 daval\u0131 erkek taraf\u0131ndan; kusur belirlemesi, kad\u0131n yarar\u0131na h\u00fckmedilen yoksulluk nafakas\u0131 ve reddedilen kendi manevi tazminat talebi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden, daval\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 kad\u0131n taraf\u0131ndan ise erke\u011fin davas\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc, kusur belirlemesi, reddedilen tazminat talepleri, yoksulluk nafakas\u0131n\u0131n miktar\u0131 ile velayet d\u00fczenlemesi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden temyiz edilmekle, evrak okunup gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n
1-Daval\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 kad\u0131n\u0131n “Erke\u011fin bo\u015fanma davas\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fcne” y\u00f6nelik temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin incelenmesinde;
\n\u0130lk derece mahkemesince bu y\u00f6ne ili\u015fkin olarak verilen h\u00fck\u00fcm daval\u0131 -kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 kad\u0131n taraf\u0131ndan istinaf edilmeyerek kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir. Bu nedenle daval\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 kad\u0131n\u0131n, istinaf edilmeyerek kesinle\u015fen bu y\u00f6ne ili\u015fkin temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin reddine karar vermek gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
2-Taraflar\u0131n di\u011fer temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesine gelince;<\/p>\n
a) Dosyadaki yaz\u0131lara, karar\u0131n dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 delillerle kanuna uygun sebeplere ve \u00f6zellikle delillerin takdirinde bir yanl\u0131\u015fl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fclmemesine g\u00f6re davac\u0131 -kar\u015f\u0131 daval\u0131 erke\u011fin t\u00fcm, daval\u0131 -kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 kad\u0131n\u0131n ise a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki bent kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yersizdir.<\/p>\n
b) \u0130lk derece mahkemesince kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131 olarak a\u00e7\u0131lan bo\u015fanma davalar\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 sonucunda her iki bo\u015fanma davas\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile taraflar\u0131n bo\u015fanmalar\u0131na, taraflar\u0131n ortak \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 2008 do\u011fumlu … ile 2012 do\u011fumlu …’nun velayetlerinin davac\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 daval\u0131 babaya verilmesine h\u00fckmedilmi\u015f, daval\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 annenin bu y\u00f6ne ili\u015fkin istinaf talebi b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesince esastan reddedilmi\u015f, h\u00fck\u00fcm taraflarca temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Velayet ve ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki d\u00fczenlenirken; g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde tutulmas\u0131 gereken temel ilke, \u00e7ocu\u011fun “\u00dcst\u00fcn yarar\u0131d\u0131r” (Birle\u015fmi\u015f Milletler \u00c7ocuk Haklar\u0131na Dair S\u00f6zle\u015fme md.3; \u00c7ocuk Haklar\u0131n\u0131n Kullan\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin Avrupa S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi m. 1; TMK m. 339\/1. 34.3\/1, 346\/1; \u00c7ocuk Koruma Kanunu m. 4\/b). \u00c7ocu\u011fun \u00fcst\u00fcn yarar\u0131n\u0131 belirlerken; onun bedensel, zihinsel, ruhsal, ahlaki ve toplumsal geli\u015fiminin sa\u011flanmas\u0131 amac\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6zetilmesi gereklidir. Ana ve baban\u0131n yararlar\u0131; bo\u015fanmadaki kusurlar\u0131, ahlaki de\u011fer yarg\u0131lar\u0131, sosyal konumlar\u0131 gibi durumlar\u0131, \u00e7ocu\u011fun \u00fcst\u00fcn yarar\u0131n\u0131 etkilemedi\u011fi \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde tutulur. Velayet d\u00fczenlemesi kamu d\u00fczenine ili\u015fkin olup, re’sen ara\u015ft\u0131rma ilkesi ge\u00e7erlidir. Bu nedenle yarg\u0131lama s\u0131ras\u0131nda meydana gelen geli\u015fmelerin bile g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde tutulmas\u0131 gerekir. Taraflar\u0131n davay\u0131 kabul\u00fc de tek ba\u015f\u0131na hukuki sonu\u00e7 do\u011furmaz. Birle\u015fmi\u015f Milletler \u00c7ocuk Haklar\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin 12. ve \u00c7ocuk Haklar\u0131n\u0131n Kullan\u0131lmas\u0131na \u0130li\u015fkin Avrupa S\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin 3 ve 6. maddeleri idrak \u00e7a\u011f\u0131ndaki \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n kendilerini ilgilendiren konularda g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcn al\u0131nmas\u0131 ve g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerine gereken \u00f6nemin verilmesini \u00f6ng\u00f6rmektedir. \u00c7ocuklar\u0131n \u00fcst\u00fcn yarar\u0131 gerektirdi\u011fi takdirde, g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerinin aksine karar verilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
Dosyan\u0131n incelenmesinde; al\u0131nan 15.03.2018 tarihli ilk sosyal inceleme raporunda ortak \u00e7ocuklardan … uzmana, babas\u0131n\u0131n i\u00e7ki i\u00e7erek annesine \u015fiddet uygulad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, babas\u0131n\u0131n iki \u00fc\u00e7 g\u00fcn \u00f6nce okula gelerek kendisine ” Amcalarla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeye gitti\u011finde o amcalara (annenin) eve erkekler getirdi\u011fini s\u00f6yle, bunlar\u0131 s\u00f6ylemezsen beni hapse atarlar bir daha y\u00fcz\u00fcm\u00fc g\u00f6remezsin” dedi\u011fini, evde babas\u0131n\u0131n, babaannesinin ve yengesinin annesini sevmediklerini ve annesine k\u00fcf\u00fcr ettiklerini, parma\u011f\u0131n\u0131n okulda top oynarken k\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kendisini d\u00f6ven ya da k\u0131zan kimsenin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, babas\u0131nda kalmak istedi\u011fini beyan etmi\u015ftir. Rapor tarihinde hen\u00fcz 6 ya\u015f\u0131n\u0131 doldurmayan ortak \u00e7ocuk … ise beyan\u0131nda, babas\u0131n\u0131n i\u00e7ki i\u00e7ti\u011fini ve s\u00fcrekli annesini d\u00f6vd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, annesini d\u0131\u015far\u0131ya atarak kap\u0131y\u0131 \u00fczerine kilitledi\u011fini, annesinin a\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, annesinde kalmak istedi\u011fini beyan etmi\u015ftir. Uzman ise g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f k\u0131sm\u0131nda, her iki \u00e7ocu\u011fun halen anne yan\u0131nda bulunduklar\u0131n\u0131, ortak \u00e7ocuk …’in beyan verirken tedirgin ve kayg\u0131l\u0131 oldu\u011funu, daha bir \u015fey sorulmadan babas\u0131nda kalmak istedi\u011fini s\u00f6yledi\u011fini, …’nun ise daha rahat ve payla\u015f\u0131ma a\u00e7\u0131k davrand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, her iki \u00e7ocu\u011fun da ebeveynleri taraf\u0131ndan y\u00f6nlendirilmi\u015f olabileceklerini, ya\u015flar\u0131 itibariyle daha \u00e7ok anne bak\u0131m ve \u015fefkatine ihtiya\u00e7 duyduklar\u0131 bir d\u00f6nemde olduklar\u0131n\u0131, annenin \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n velayetini almaya fiziksel ve psikolojik bir engelinin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, velayet konusunda istekli oldu\u011funu, \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n anneleri ile olmalar\u0131n\u0131n y\u00fcksek menfaatlerine olaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan etmi\u015ftir. Ayn\u0131 uzman 23.12.2019 tarihli ek raporunda ise, daval\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 kad\u0131n\u0131n gayri ahlaki bir ya\u015fant\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n oldu\u011funun, davac\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 daval\u0131 erke\u011fin ise k\u00fcf\u00fcr ve hakaret etti\u011finin, alkol kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ve \u015fiddet uygulad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n iddia edildi\u011fini, bu iddialar \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde mesaj ve ses kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n sunuldu\u011funu ve tan\u0131klar\u0131n dinlendi\u011finini, mahkemede olu\u015facak kanaate g\u00f6re vel\u00e2yet konusunda karar verilmesinin uygun olaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan etmi\u015ftir. Ald\u0131r\u0131lan son raporda ise \u00e7ocuklardan …’in baba yan\u0131nda kalmaya ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131, k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck … ile annenin ise mahkemenin tedbir karar\u0131 uyar\u0131nca ortak evde birlikte ya\u015fad\u0131klar\u0131, erke\u011fin bu evin elektrik ve do\u011falgaz\u0131n\u0131 kapatt\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme tarihinde k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck …’nun \u00fc\u015f\u00fcterek hasta oldu\u011funun g\u00f6zlemlendi\u011fi, annenin k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fc\u011f\u00fc asla b\u0131rakamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131n kendisine ihtiya\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n oldu\u011funu beyan ederek a\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131, baba \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan b\u00fcy\u00fck \u00e7ocuk …’e babaanne ve dedesinin bakt\u0131\u011f\u0131, annenin velayet sorumlulu\u011funu alabilecek yeterlilikte olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na y\u00f6nelik ifadelerle velayet konusunda takdirin mahkemeye b\u0131rak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f bildirildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.
\nToplanan delillerden, daval\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 kad\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fka erkeklerle mesajla\u015farak g\u00fcven sars\u0131c\u0131 davran\u0131\u015flarda bulundu\u011fu sabit ise de gayr\u0131 ahlaki bir ya\u015fam s\u00fcrd\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ispatlanamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u00d6zellikle \u00e7ocuklardan …’in uzmana verdi\u011fi beyanlar ve son raporda kad\u0131n ve \u00e7ocuklardan …’nun ya\u015fad\u0131klar\u0131 ortam\u0131n fiziki ko\u015fullar\u0131 dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda baban\u0131n \u00e7ocuklar \u00fczerindeki y\u00f6nlendirme ve bask\u0131s\u0131 ile daval\u0131 -kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 kad\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 \u00f6fkesinin yo\u011fun oldu\u011fu, \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n ya\u015f, geli\u015fimleri de g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde anne bak\u0131m ve \u015fefkatine daha \u00e7ok ihtiya\u00e7 duyduklar\u0131 bir d\u00f6nemde bulunduklar\u0131, annenin velayet g\u00f6revini a\u011f\u0131r ihmal durumunun somut delillerle ispatlanamad\u0131\u011f\u0131, baba, babaanne ve yengenin anneye kar\u015f\u0131 olumsuz tutum ve s\u00f6ylemlerinin \u00e7ocuklar taraf\u0131ndan da beyan edildi\u011fi, velayet d\u00fczenlemesinde as\u0131l olan\u0131n \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n \u00fcst\u00fcn menfaatinin korunmas\u0131 oldu\u011fu, ki\u015fisel \u00f6fke ve intikam duygular\u0131n\u0131n kesinlikle \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n \u00fcst\u00fcn menfaatlerine tercih edilemeyecekleri, kald\u0131 ki baban\u0131n uzun s\u00fcreli \u015fehir d\u0131\u015f\u0131 i\u015flerde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 nedeniyle velayeti almas\u0131 durumunda \u00e7ocuklara babaanne ve dedenin bakaca\u011f\u0131 hususu da g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde taraflar\u0131n ortak \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 2008 do\u011fumlu … ve 2012 do\u011fumlu …’nun velayetlerinin daval\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 annelerine verilmesine karar vermek gerekirken, yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 do\u011fru g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f, bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
SONU\u00c7 : Daval\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 kad\u0131n\u0131n “Erke\u011fin bo\u015fanma davas\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fcne” y\u00f6nelik temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin ise yukar\u0131da (1.) bentte g\u00f6sterilen sebeple REDD\u0130NE, temyiz edilen b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesi h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn yukar\u0131da (2\/b) bendinde g\u00f6sterilen sebeple BOZULMASINA, bozman\u0131n kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan temyize konu di\u011fer b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerinin ise yukar\u0131da (2\/a) bendinde g\u00f6sterilen sebeple ONANMASINA, a\u015fa\u011f\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 harc\u0131n …’a y\u00fckletilmesine, pe\u015fin harc\u0131n mahsubuna 292.10 TL temyiz ba\u015fvuru harc\u0131 pe\u015fin yat\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ba\u015fkaca har\u00e7 al\u0131nmas\u0131na yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131n\u0131n istek halinde yat\u0131ran …’e geri verilmesine, dosyan\u0131n ilgili b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesi hukuk dairesine g\u00f6nderilmesine oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi. 23.06.2021 (\u00c7r\u015f.)<\/p>\n
—<\/p>\n
T.C.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay <\/p>\n
2. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n
2020\/581 E., 2020\/2382 K.<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
MAHKEMES\u0130 :Asliye Hukuk (Aile) Mahkemesi
\nDAVA T\u00dcR\u00dc : Velayetin De\u011fi\u015ftirilmesi
\nKARAR D\u00dcZELTME \u0130STEYEN : Davac\u0131<\/p>\n
Yukar\u0131da tarihi, konusu ve taraflar\u0131 g\u00f6sterilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn; k\u0131smen bozulmas\u0131na-k\u0131smen onanmas\u0131na dair Dairemizin 15.10.2019 g\u00fcn ve 2019\/4491-2019\/10161 say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131yla ilgili karar d\u00fczeltme isteminde bulunulmakla, evrak okundu, gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc;<\/p>\n
6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu 1.10.2011 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmi\u015f ise de, bu Kanuna 6217 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunla ilave edilen ge\u00e7ici 3. maddenin (1.) bendinde, B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemelerinin g\u00f6reve ba\u015flama tarihinden \u00f6nce verilen kararlar hakk\u0131nda, kesinle\u015finceye kadar 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 26.09.2014 tarihli ve 5236 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunla yap\u0131lan de\u011fi\u015fiklikten \u00f6nceki 427 ila 454. madde h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanmas\u0131na devam olunaca\u011f\u0131 h\u00fckme ba\u011fland\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, karar d\u00fczeltme talebinin incelenmesi gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
1-Temyiz ilam\u0131nda yer alan a\u00e7\u0131klamalara g\u00f6re, davac\u0131n\u0131n a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki bendin kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan karar d\u00fczeltme itirazlar\u0131 yersizdir.<\/p>\n
2-Mahkemece, davac\u0131 baba taraf\u0131ndan a\u00e7\u0131lan velayetin d\u00fczenlenmesi davas\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 sonucunda davan\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile ortak \u00e7ocuk Enes’in velayetinin anneye, ortak \u00e7ocuk Ender\u2019in velayetinin ise davac\u0131 babaya verilmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Karar\u0131n davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine, Dairemizin 15.10.2019 tarih ve 2019\/4491 esas ve 2019\/10161 karar say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 ile h\u00fckm\u00fcn “Velayet kendisine b\u0131rak\u0131lmayan e\u015fle di\u011feri aras\u0131nda ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki d\u00fczenlenirken karde\u015flerin birbirini g\u00f6rmelerine olanak sa\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 \u015fekilde d\u00fczenleme yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n karde\u015flik ili\u015fkisinin geli\u015fmesi i\u00e7in \u00f6nemli oldu\u011fu, bu bak\u0131mdan karde\u015flerin birbirini g\u00f6recek \u015fekilde ve tatil d\u00f6nemleri de ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131larak ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki tesisi gerekirken yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm tesisinin do\u011fru olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131” belirtilerek bozulmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015f, bozma kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan temyize konu di\u011fer b\u00f6l\u00fcmler ise onanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Mahkemece velayeti anneye b\u0131rak\u0131lan ortak \u00e7ocuk Enes ile baba aras\u0131nda \u00e7ocu\u011fun yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131na \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmamak ko\u015fuluyla ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki tesisine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Davac\u0131 baba Almanya’da ya\u015famaktad\u0131r. Velayeti anneye b\u0131rak\u0131lan k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fckle baba aras\u0131nda kurulan ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn fikri ve bedeni ili\u015fkisinin geli\u015fmesi ile babal\u0131k duygular\u0131n\u0131n da tatminini gerektirir. Bu husus nazara al\u0131nmadan ortak \u00e7ocuk Enes ile baba aras\u0131nda yer s\u0131n\u0131rlamas\u0131 yaparak ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki tesisi do\u011fru olmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen bu durum kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yer s\u0131n\u0131rlamas\u0131 yap\u0131lmamas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi de belirtilmek suretiyle bozma karar\u0131 verilmesi gerekirken, ilk incelemede bu husus g\u00f6zden ka\u00e7\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fundan davac\u0131 baban\u0131n karar d\u00fczeltme isteminin bu y\u00f6nden kabul\u00fcne ve Dairemizin k\u0131smen onama-k\u0131smen bozmaya dair ilam\u0131n\u0131n 2. bendinde bu bozma sebebi de eklenerek yerel mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n de\u011fi\u015fik gerek\u00e7e ile bozulmas\u0131na karar vermek gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
SONU\u00c7: Yukar\u0131da 2. bentte g\u00f6sterilen sebeple, davac\u0131n\u0131n ki\u015fisel ili\u015fkiye ili\u015fkin karar d\u00fczeltme iste\u011finin kabul\u00fc ile Dairemizin 15.10.2019 tarih ve 2019\/4491 esas ve 2019\/10161 karar say\u0131l\u0131 k\u0131smen onama k\u0131smen bozmaya dair ilam\u0131n\u0131n 2. bendine “Mahkemece velayeti anneye b\u0131rak\u0131lan ortak \u00e7ocuk Enes ile baba aras\u0131nda \u00e7ocu\u011fun yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131na \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmamak ko\u015fuluyla ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki tesisine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Velayeti anneye b\u0131rak\u0131lan k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fckle baba aras\u0131nda kurulan ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn fikri ve bedeni ili\u015fkisinin geli\u015fmesi ile babal\u0131k duygular\u0131n\u0131n da tatminini gerektirir. Bu husus nazara al\u0131nmadan ortak \u00e7ocuk Enes ile baba aras\u0131nda yer s\u0131n\u0131rlamas\u0131 yaparak ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki tesisi do\u011fru olmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r” \u015feklindeki bozma sebebinin eklenmesine, h\u00fckm\u00fcn belirtilen \u015fekilde de\u011fi\u015fik gerek\u00e7eyle BOZULMASINA, davac\u0131n\u0131n di\u011fer karar d\u00fczeltme isteklerinin ise yukar\u0131da 1. bentte g\u00f6sterilen REDD\u0130NE, karar d\u00fczeltme harc\u0131n\u0131n istek halinde yat\u0131rana geri verilmesine oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi. 01.06.2020 (Pzt.)<\/p>\n
—<\/p>\n
T.C.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay <\/p>\n
2. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n
2020\/1715 E., 2020\/2415 K.<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
MAHKEMES\u0130 :Aile Mahkemesi
\nDAVA T\u00dcR\u00dc : Velayetin De\u011fi\u015ftirilmesi<\/p>\n
Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki davan\u0131n yap\u0131lan muhakemesi sonunda mahalli mahkemece verilen, yukar\u0131da tarihi ve numaras\u0131 g\u00f6sterilen h\u00fck\u00fcm davac\u0131 baba taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmekle, evrak okunup gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n
Mahkemece, taraflar\u0131n ortak \u00e7ocu\u011fu G\u00f6rkem \u015eahan 2009 do\u011fumlu olup velayeti daval\u0131 anneye verilmi\u015ftir. Velayet d\u00fczenlemesi yap\u0131l\u0131rken; g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde tutulmas\u0131 gereken temel ilke, \u00e7ocu\u011fun “\u00dcst\u00fcn yarar\u0131” (Birle\u015fmi\u015f Milletler \u00c7ocuk Haklar\u0131na Dair S\u00f6zle\u015fme m. 3; \u00c7ocuk Haklar\u0131n\u0131n Kullan\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin Avrupa S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi m. 1; TMK m. 339\/1. 343\/1. 346\/1; \u00c7ocuk Koruma Kanunu m. 4\/b) d\u0131r. \u00c7ocu\u011fun \u00fcst\u00fcn yarar\u0131n\u0131 belirlerken; onun bedensel, zihinsel, ruhsal, ahlaki ve toplumsal geli\u015fiminin sa\u011flanmas\u0131 amac\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6zetilmesi gereklidir. Ana ve baban\u0131n yararlar\u0131, bo\u015fanmadaki kusurlar\u0131, ahlaki de\u011fer yarg\u0131lar\u0131, sosyal konumlar\u0131 gibi durumlar\u0131 \u00e7ocu\u011fun \u00fcst\u00fcn yarar\u0131n\u0131 etkilemedi\u011fi \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde tutulur. Velayet d\u00fczenlemesinde; \u00e7ocukla ana ve baba yarar\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7at\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 halinde, \u00e7ocu\u011fun yarar\u0131na \u00fcst\u00fcnl\u00fck tan\u0131nmas\u0131 gereklidir.<\/p>\n
Velayet kamu d\u00fczenine ili\u015fkin olup re’sen ara\u015ft\u0131rma ilkesi ge\u00e7erlidir. Birle\u015fmi\u015f Milletler \u00c7ocuk Haklar\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin 12. maddesi ile \u00c7ocuk Haklar\u0131n\u0131n Kullan\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin Avrupa S\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin 3 ve 6. maddeleri, i\u00e7 hukuk taraf\u0131ndan yeterli idrake sahip oldu\u011fu kabul edilen \u00e7ocuklara, kendilerini ilgilendiren davalarda g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerini ifade etmeye olanak tan\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131 ve g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerine gereken \u00f6nemin verilmesi gerekti\u011fini \u00f6ng\u00f6rmektedir. \u00c7ocuklar\u0131n \u00fcst\u00fcn yarar\u0131 gerektirdi\u011fi takdirde g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerinin aksine karar verilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr. Velayet hususu, \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 ilgilendiren konular\u0131n en ba\u015f\u0131nda gelir. Mahkemece davac\u0131 baba taraf\u0131ndan a\u00e7\u0131lan velayet davas\u0131n\u0131n yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 yap\u0131l\u0131rken ya\u015f\u0131 sebebiyle velayet konusunda g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc a\u00e7\u0131klama olgunlu\u011funa eri\u015fen ortak \u00e7ocuk … \u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne ba\u015fvurulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi \u00e7ocuk ile anne ve baban\u0131n ya\u015fam ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n ve \u00e7ocuk ile ebeveynlerin ili\u015fkilerinin de\u011ferlendirilmesi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan sosyal inceleme raporu da al\u0131nmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
O halde; velayet konusunda idrak \u00e7a\u011f\u0131nda bulunan ortak \u00e7ocuk … ‘\u0131n e\u011fitim, k\u00fclt\u00fcr, ya\u015fam olanaklar\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan nerede ya\u015famak istedi\u011fi konusunda bilgilendirilerek velayet hakk\u0131ndaki g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcn sorulmas\u0131 ve 4787 say\u0131l\u0131 Aile Mahkemelerinin Kurulu\u015f, G\u00f6rev ve Yarg\u0131lama Usullerine Dair Kanun’un 5. maddesi gere\u011fince aile mahkemesi b\u00fcnyesinde bulunan psikolog, pedagog ve sosyal \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmac\u0131dan olu\u015fan uzmanlardan, her iki ebeveyn ve \u00e7ocukla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmek suretiyle inceleme ve rapor istenip taraflar\u0131n bar\u0131nma, gelir, sosyal ve psikolojik durumlar\u0131na g\u00f6re \u00e7ocu\u011fun sa\u011fl\u0131kl\u0131 geli\u015fimi i\u00e7in velayeti \u00fcstlenmeye engel bir durumun bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ya\u015fan\u0131lan ortam\u0131nda da inceleme yapmak sureti ile ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 ve di\u011fer deliller de g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nmak suretiyle ebeveynlerinden hangisi yan\u0131nda kalmas\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7ocu\u011fun menfaatine olaca\u011f\u0131 tespit edilerek t\u00fcm deliller birlikte de\u011ferlendirilip velayet konusunda bir karar verilmesi gerekirken eksik inceleme ve ara\u015ft\u0131rmayla yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 usul ve kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 olup bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
SONU\u00c7: Temyiz edilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn yukar\u0131da g\u00f6sterilen sebeple BOZULMASINA, temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131n\u0131n istek halinde yat\u0131rana geri verilmesine, i\u015fbu karar\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren 15 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde karar d\u00fczeltme yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi. 01.06.2020 (Pzt.)<\/p>\n
—<\/p>\n
T.C.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay <\/p>\n
2. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n
2019\/4491 E., 2019\/10161 K.<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
MAHKEMES\u0130 :Asliye Hukuk (Aile) Mahkemesi
\nDAVA T\u00dcR\u00dc : Velayetin D\u00fczenlenmesi<\/p>\n
Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki davan\u0131n yap\u0131lan muhakemesi sonunda mahalli mahkemece verilen, yukar\u0131da tarihi ve numaras\u0131 g\u00f6sterilen h\u00fck\u00fcm davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan ortak \u00e7ocuk…’in velayeti, ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki s\u00fcresi ve i\u015ftirak nafakas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden temyiz edilerek; temyiz incelemesinin duru\u015fmal\u0131 olarak yap\u0131lmas\u0131 istenilmekle; duru\u015fma i\u00e7in belirlenen 15\/10\/2019 g\u00fcn\u00fc temyiz eden davac\u0131 … vekili Av. … geldi. Kar\u015f\u0131 taraf daval\u0131 … ve vekili gelmedi. Gelenin konu\u015fmas\u0131 dinlendikten sonra i\u015fin incelenerek karara ba\u011flanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in duru\u015fmadan sonraya b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131 uygun g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc. Bug\u00fcn dosyadaki b\u00fct\u00fcn ka\u011f\u0131tlar okunup gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n
1-Dosyadaki yaz\u0131lara, bozmaya uygun i\u015flem ve ara\u015ft\u0131rma yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131na, delillerin takdirinde bir yanl\u0131\u015fl\u0131k bulunmamas\u0131na g\u00f6re, davac\u0131n\u0131n a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki bendin kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yersizdir.<\/p>\n
2-Ortak \u00e7ocuklardan …’in velayeti anneye, …’in ise babaya b\u0131rak\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Velayet kendisine b\u0131rak\u0131lmayan e\u015fle di\u011feri aras\u0131nda ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki d\u00fczenlenirken karde\u015flerin birbirini g\u00f6rmelerine olanak sa\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 \u015fekilde d\u00fczenleme yap\u0131lmas\u0131 karde\u015flik ili\u015fkisinin geli\u015fmesi i\u00e7in \u00f6nemlidir. Bu bak\u0131mdan karde\u015flerin birbirini g\u00f6recek \u015fekilde ve tatil d\u00f6nemleri de ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131larak ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki tesisi gerekirken yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm tesisi do\u011fru de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n
SONU\u00c7: Temyiz edilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn yukar\u0131da 2. bentte g\u00f6sterilen sebeple BOZULMASINA, bozma kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan temyize konu di\u011fer b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerin ise yukar\u0131da 1. bentte g\u00f6sterilen sebeple ONANMASINA, duru\u015fma i\u00e7in takdir olunan 2.037 TL vekalet \u00fccretinin, daval\u0131dan al\u0131narak davac\u0131ya verilmesine, temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131n\u0131n istek halinde yat\u0131rana geri verilmesine, i\u015fbu karar\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren 15 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde karar d\u00fczeltme yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi. 15.10.2019 (Sal\u0131)<\/p>\n
—<\/p>\n
T.C.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay <\/p>\n
2. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n
2019\/5047 E., 2019\/12018 K.<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
MAHKEMES\u0130 : Ankara B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 2. Hukuk Dairesi
\nDAVA T\u00dcR\u00dc : Bo\u015fanma<\/p>\n
Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki davan\u0131n yap\u0131lan muhakemesi sonunda b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesi hukuk dairesince verilen, yukar\u0131da tarihi ve numaras\u0131 g\u00f6sterilen h\u00fck\u00fcm daval\u0131 kad\u0131n taraf\u0131ndan; kusur belirlemesi, aleyhine h\u00fckmedilen tazminatlar ve velayet y\u00f6n\u00fcnden temyiz edilmekle, evrak okunup gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n
1-Dosyadaki yaz\u0131lara, karar\u0131n dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 delillerle kanuna uygun sebeplere ve \u00f6zellikle delillerin takdirinde bir yanl\u0131\u015fl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fclmemesine g\u00f6re, daval\u0131 kad\u0131n\u0131n a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki bendin kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yersizdir.<\/p>\n
2-Velayet kamu d\u00fczenine ili\u015fkin olup, velayet d\u00fczenlemesinde as\u0131l olan \u00e7ocu\u011fun \u00fcst\u00fcn yarar\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Ana – baba ve \u00e7ocu\u011fun yarar\u0131 \u00e7at\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde, \u00e7ocu\u011fun yarar\u0131na \u00fcst\u00fcnl\u00fck tan\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekir. Bo\u015fanman\u0131n ileriye y\u00f6nelik etkilerini hafifletmekte ve \u00e7ocu\u011fun bo\u015fanmadan sonraki hayata al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131ndaki en \u00f6nemli etken, \u00e7ocu\u011fun hayat\u0131nda kararl\u0131l\u0131k ve s\u00fcreklili\u011fin sa\u011flanmas\u0131d\u0131r. Ortak \u00e7ocuk hen\u00fcz 5 ya\u015f\u0131nda olup, ya\u015f\u0131 dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, anne bak\u0131m ve \u015fefkatine muhta\u00e7t\u0131r. \u00c7ocu\u011fun \u00fcst\u00fcn yarar\u0131n\u0131n tespiti amac\u0131yla d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f bulunan dosyada mevcut uzman g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fleri i\u00e7inde de anneye verilmesine engel bir durumun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 da dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda; ortak \u00e7ocu\u011fun belirli aral\u0131klarla her iki ebeveyn yan\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131, anne ile kurdu\u011fu ba\u011f, ya\u015f\u0131 ve i\u00e7inde bulundu\u011fu geli\u015fim d\u00f6neminin \u00f6zellikleri, anne varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn psiko-sosyal geli\u015fimi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan \u00f6nemi, annenin sergiledi\u011fi ebeveyn tutumu ve k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fc\u011fe yakla\u015f\u0131m\u0131, g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda velayetin anneye verilmesi gerekirken, yan\u0131lg\u0131l\u0131 de\u011ferlendirme ile velayetin babaya verilmesi usul ve kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 olup, bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
SONU\u00c7: Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan sebeple Ankara B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 2. Hukuk Dairesinin 06\/03\/2019 tarih, 2017\/2687 esas ve 2019\/419 karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n, 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu’nun 373\/1. maddesine g\u00f6re BOZULMASINA, karar\u0131n bozma kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan temyize konu di\u011fer b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerinin ise yukar\u0131da 1. bentte g\u00f6sterilen sebeple ONANMASINA, istek halinde temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131n\u0131n yat\u0131rana geri verilmesine, dosyan\u0131n ilgili b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesi hukuk dairesine g\u00f6nderilmesine oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi. 09.12.2019 (Pzt.)<\/p>\n
—<\/p>\n
T.C.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay <\/p>\n
2. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n
2019\/906 E., 2019\/1745 K.<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
MAHKEMES\u0130 :Asliye Hukuk (Aile) Mahkemesi
\nDAVA T\u00dcR\u00dc : Velayetin De\u011fi\u015ftirilmesi<\/p>\n
Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki davan\u0131n yap\u0131lan muhakemesi sonunda mahalli mahkemece verilen, yukar\u0131da tarihi ve numaras\u0131 g\u00f6sterilen h\u00fck\u00fcm davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmekle, evrak okunup gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n
Davac\u0131 anne, bo\u015fanma ile velayeti daval\u0131 babaya b\u0131rak\u0131lan ortak \u00e7ocuk 03.08.2008 do\u011fumlu …’n\u0131n velayetinin de\u011fi\u015ftirilerek kendisine verilmesini talep etmi\u015f, mahkemece baba taraf\u0131ndan velayet g\u00f6revinin gere\u011fi gibi yerine getirildi\u011fi ve velayetin de\u011fi\u015ftirilmesini gerektiren bir sebebin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Velayet d\u00fczenlemesinde; \u00e7ocukla ana ve baba yarar\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7at\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 halinde as\u0131l olan k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn yarar\u0131n\u0131 korumak ve gelece\u011fini g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na almakt\u0131r. \u00c7ocu\u011fun yarar\u0131 ise; \u00e7ocu\u011fun bedensel, fikri ve ahlaki bak\u0131mdan en iyi \u015fekilde geli\u015febilmesi ve b\u00f6yle bir geli\u015fmenin ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmesi i\u00e7in, \u00e7ocu\u011fa sosyal, ekonomik ve k\u00fclt\u00fcrel ko\u015fullar\u0131n sa\u011flanm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131d\u0131r. \u00c7ocu\u011fun bu konulardaki \u00fcst\u00fcn yarar\u0131n\u0131 belirlerken; \u00e7ocuk yeti\u015fkin biri olmu\u015f olsayd\u0131, kendisini ilgilendiren bir olayda, kendi yarar\u0131 i\u00e7in ne gibi bir karar verebilecekti ise, \u00e7ocuk i\u00e7in karar verme makam\u0131ndaki ki\u015finin de, ayn\u0131 y\u00f6nde karar vermesi; yani \u00e7ocu\u011fun farazi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesi esas al\u0131nacakt\u0131r.
\nBirle\u015fmi\u015f Milletler \u00c7ocuk Haklar\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin 12. ve \u00c7ocuk Haklar\u0131n\u0131n Kullan\u0131lmas\u0131na \u0130li\u015fkin Avrupa S\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin 3. ve 6. maddeleri idrak \u00e7a\u011f\u0131ndaki \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n kendilerini ilgilendiren konularda g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcn al\u0131nmas\u0131 ve g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerine gereken \u00f6nemin verilmesini \u00f6ng\u00f6rmektedir. \u00c7ocuklar\u0131n \u00fcst\u00fcn yarar\u0131 gerektirdi\u011fi takdirde, g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerinin aksine karar verilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
4721 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu uyar\u0131nca velayet, \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n bak\u0131m, e\u011fitim, \u00f6\u011fretim ve korunmas\u0131 ile temsil g\u00f6revlerini kapsar. Velayet, ayn\u0131 zamanda ana baban\u0131n velayeti alt\u0131ndaki \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n ki\u015filiklerine ve mallar\u0131na ili\u015fkin haklar\u0131, \u00f6devleri, yetkileri ve y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckleri de i\u00e7erir. Ana ve baban\u0131n \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n ki\u015filiklerine ili\u015fkin hak ve \u00f6devleri; \u00f6zellikle \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 \u015fah\u0131slar\u0131na, bakmak, onlar\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fcp g\u00f6zetmek, ge\u00e7imlerini sa\u011flamak, yeti\u015ftirilmelerini ve e\u011fitimlerini ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirmektir. Bu ba\u011flamda sa\u011flayaca\u011f\u0131 e\u011fitim ile istenilen \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde d\u00fcr\u00fcst, k\u00f6t\u00fc al\u0131\u015fkanl\u0131klardan uzak, iyi ahlak sahibi, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fkan ve bilgili bir \u00eensan olarak yeti\u015ftirmek hak ve y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Velayet, kamu d\u00fczenine ili\u015fkin olup bu hususta ana ile baban\u0131n istek ve beyanlar\u0131ndan ziyade \u00e7ocu\u011fun menfaatlerinin dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 zorunlu olup, yarg\u0131lama s\u0131ras\u0131nda meydana gelen geli\u015fmelerin bile g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde tutulmas\u0131 gerekir. Buna g\u00f6re velayetin d\u00fczenlenmesinde as\u0131l olan, k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn yarar\u0131n\u0131 korumak ve gelece\u011fini g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na almak oldu\u011fundan, \u00e7ocu\u011fun fiziksel ve ruhsal geli\u015fimini engelleyen ve s\u00fcreklilik arz edece\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lan her olay, tehlikenin b\u00fcy\u00fckl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, do\u011furaca\u011f\u0131 onar\u0131lmas\u0131 g\u00fc\u00e7 sonu\u00e7lar de\u011ferlendirilerek sonuca var\u0131lmal\u0131; velayetin belirlenmesi ve d\u00fczenlenmesinde \u00f6ncelikle \u00e7ocu\u011fun yarar\u0131 g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde tutulmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Mahkemece yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama ve toplanan delillere g\u00f6re; taraflar\u0131n bo\u015fanmalar\u0131na ili\u015fkin karar\u0131n 15.11.2011 tarihinde kesinle\u015fti\u011fi, taraflar\u0131n ortak \u00e7ocu\u011fu 05.10.2010 do\u011fumlu Ya\u011fmur’un velayetinin davac\u0131 anneye, 03.08.2008 do\u011fumlu H\u00fcseyin Arda’n\u0131n velayetinin ise daval\u0131 babaya b\u0131rak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131ndan ve mahkemece al\u0131nan sosyal inceleme raporlar\u0131nda ge\u00e7en beyanlardan; velayeti daval\u0131 babada bulunan ortak \u00e7ocuk H\u00fcseyin Arda’n\u0131n fiilen babaanne ve b\u00fcy\u00fckbaba ile birlikte ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131, daval\u0131 baban\u0131n yeni e\u015fi ve yeni e\u015finden olma \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 ile birlikte ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131 eve arada s\u0131rada gitti\u011fi, daval\u0131 baban\u0131n sosyal inceleme raporunu d\u00fczenleyen bilirki\u015fiye son 6 y\u0131ld\u0131r uyu\u015fturucu madde kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve bu sebeple tedavi g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ili\u015fkin beyanda bulundu\u011fu, daval\u0131 baban\u0131n davaya konu \u00e7ocu\u011fa kar\u015f\u0131 ilgisiz oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Davac\u0131 anne hakk\u0131nda yap\u0131lan sosyal inceleme raporunda ise, annenin velayet g\u00f6revini \u00fcstlenmesine engel bir durumun bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 rapor edilmi\u015ftir. Ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen bu duruma g\u00f6re; ortak \u00e7ocu\u011fun, velayet g\u00f6revinin gereklerini fiilen yerine getirmeyen, \u00e7ocu\u011fa ilgi g\u00f6stermeyen ve uzun s\u00fcreli olarak uyu\u015fturucu madde kullanan daval\u0131 baba yan\u0131nda kalmas\u0131, onun fiziksel ve ruhsal geli\u015fimini olumsuz etkileyecek nitelikte olup, karde\u015flerin bir arada ya\u015famalar\u0131n\u0131n geli\u015fimlerine sa\u011flayaca\u011f\u0131 olumlu katk\u0131lar ile \u00e7ocu\u011fun \u00fcst\u00fcn yarar\u0131 gerektirdi\u011fi takdirde g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerinin aksine de karar verilebilece\u011fi dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, yukar\u0131da belirtilen ilkeler \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde davan\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile dava konusu ortak \u00e7ocu\u011fun velayetinin de\u011fi\u015ftirilmesine karar verilmesi gerekirken, baban\u0131n son d\u00f6nemde uyu\u015fturucu madde kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespit edilemedi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 do\u011fru olmay\u0131p bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
SONU\u00c7: Temyiz edilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn yukar\u0131da g\u00f6sterilen sebeple BOZULMASINA, temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131n\u0131n istek halinde yat\u0131rana geri verilmesine, i\u015fbu karar\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren 15 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde karar d\u00fczeltme yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi. 27.02.2019 (\u00c7ar. )<\/p>\n
—<\/p>\n
T.C.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay <\/p>\n
2. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n
2016\/24042 E., 2018\/10581 K.<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
MAHKEMES\u0130 :Asliye Hukuk (Aile) Mahkemesi
\nDAVA T\u00dcR\u00dc : Kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131 Bo\u015fanma<\/p>\n
Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki davan\u0131n yap\u0131lan muhakemesi sonunda mahalli mahkemece verilen, yukar\u0131da tarihi ve numaras\u0131 g\u00f6sterilen h\u00fck\u00fcm davac\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 daval\u0131 kad\u0131n taraf\u0131ndan, kusur belirlemesi, erke\u011fin davas\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc, tazminat taleplerinin reddi, nafakalar\u0131n miktar\u0131 ve ortak \u00e7ocukla daval\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 baba aras\u0131nda kurulan ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki y\u00f6n\u00fcnden; daval\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 erkek taraf\u0131ndan ise, kusur belirlemesi, tazminat taleplerinin reddi, yoksulluk nafakas\u0131, velayet, ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki ve i\u015ftirak nafakas\u0131n\u0131n miktar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden temyiz edilmekle, evrak okunup gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n
1-Dosyadaki yaz\u0131lara, karar\u0131n dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 delillerle kanuna uygun sebeplere ve \u00f6zellikle delillerin takdirinde bir yanl\u0131\u015fl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fclmemesine g\u00f6re, taraflar\u0131n a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki bentlerin kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yersizdir.<\/p>\n
2-Taraflar\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen sosyal ve ekonomik durumlar\u0131na, nafakan\u0131n niteli\u011fine, g\u00fcn\u00fcn ekonomik ko\u015fullar\u0131na g\u00f6re davac\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 daval\u0131 kad\u0131n yarar\u0131na takdir edilen yoksulluk nafakas\u0131 miktar\u0131 azd\u0131r. Mahkemece T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu’nun 4. maddesindeki hakkaniyet ilkesi de dikkate al\u0131narak daha uygun miktarda nafakaya h\u00fckmedilmesi gerekir. Bu y\u00f6n g\u00f6zetilmeden yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3-Taraflar\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen sosyal ve ekonomik durumlar\u0131na, nafakan\u0131n niteli\u011fine, g\u00fcn\u00fcn ekonomik ko\u015fullar\u0131na g\u00f6re taraflar\u0131n ortak \u00e7ocu\u011fu 03.11.2015 do\u011fumlu …’\u0131n ihtiya\u00e7lar\u0131na nazaran takdir edilen i\u015ftirak nafakas\u0131 miktar\u0131 azd\u0131r. Mahkemece T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu’nun 4. maddesindeki hakkaniyet ilkesi de dikkate al\u0131narak daha uygun nafakaya h\u00fckmedilmesi gerekir. Bu y\u00f6n g\u00f6zetilmeden yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
4-Velayeti anneye verilen ortak \u00e7ocuk ile daval\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 baba aras\u0131nda ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki kurulurken \u00e7ocu\u011fun d\u00f6rt ya\u015f\u0131na kadar ve d\u00f6rt ya\u015f\u0131 sonras\u0131 ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 d\u00fczenlenerek, kademeli ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki d\u00fczenlemesi yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. De\u011fi\u015fen ko\u015fullara g\u00f6re, \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n ya\u015flar\u0131 ve e\u011fitim durumlar\u0131 g\u00f6zetilerek ki\u015fisel ili\u015fkinin yeniden d\u00fczenlemesi gelecek y\u0131llarda her zaman istenebilir. Velayeti davac\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 daval\u0131 anneye b\u0131rak\u0131lan ortak \u00e7ocuk ile baba aras\u0131nda, uygun s\u00fcreli ve yat\u0131l\u0131 kalacak \u015fekilde ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki kurmak gerekir. Ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki kurulmas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulurken; gelecek y\u0131llardaki ko\u015fullar \u00f6nceden bilinemeyece\u011finden, \u015fimdiden ortak \u00e7ocuk ile daval\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 baba aras\u0131nda kademeli bir \u015fekilde ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f olmas\u0131 isabetsiz olup, bozmay\u0131 gorektirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
SONU\u00c7: Temyiz edilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn yukar\u0131da (2.), (3.) ve (4.) bentlerde g\u00f6sterilen sebeplerle BOZULMASINA, bozma kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan temyize konu di\u011fer b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerinin ise yukar\u0131da (1.) bentte g\u00f6sterilen sebeple ONANMASINA, istek halinde temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131n\u0131n yat\u0131ran \u00d6mer’e geri verilmesine, i\u015f bu karar\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren 15 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde karar d\u00fczeltme yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.03.10.2018 (\u00c7r\u015f.)<\/p>\n
—<\/p>\n
T.C.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay <\/p>\n
2. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n
2015\/25768 E., 2017\/4203 K.<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
MAHKEMES\u0130 :Asliye Hukuk (Aile) Mahkemesi<\/p>\n
Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki davan\u0131n yap\u0131lan muhakemesi sonunda mahalli mahkemece verilen, yukar\u0131da tarihi ve numaras\u0131 g\u00f6sterilen h\u00fck\u00fcm davac\u0131 erkek taraf\u0131ndan, velayet d\u00fczenlemesi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden temyiz edilmekle, evrak okunup gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n
Velayet d\u00fczenlemesinde; \u00e7ocukla ana ve baba yarar\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7at\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 halinde, \u00e7ocu\u011fun yarar\u0131na \u00fcst\u00fcnl\u00fck tan\u0131nmas\u0131 gereklidir. \u00c7ocu\u011fun yarar\u0131 ise; \u00e7ocu\u011fun bedensel, fikri ve ahlaki bak\u0131mdan en iyi \u015fekilde geli\u015febilmesi ve b\u00f6yle bir geli\u015fmenin ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmesi i\u00e7in, \u00e7ocu\u011fa sosyal, ekonomik ve k\u00fclt\u00fcrel ko\u015fullar\u0131n sa\u011flanm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131d\u0131r. \u00c7ocu\u011fun bu konulardaki \u00fcst\u00fcn yarar\u0131n\u0131 belirlerken; \u00e7ocuk yeti\u015fkin biri olmu\u015f olsayd\u0131, kendisini ilgilendiren bir olayda, kendi yarar\u0131 i\u00e7in ne gibi bir karar verebilecekti ise, \u00e7ocuk i\u00e7in karar verme makam\u0131ndaki ki\u015finin de ayn\u0131 y\u00f6nde karar vermesi gerekir; yani \u00e7ocu\u011fun farazi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesi esas al\u0131nmal\u0131d\u0131r. Velayet kamu d\u00fczenine ili\u015fkin olup, re\u2019sen ara\u015ft\u0131rma ilkesi ge\u00e7erlidir. Bu nedenle yarg\u0131lama s\u0131ras\u0131nda meydana gelen geli\u015fmelerin bile g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde tutulmas\u0131 gerekir.<\/p>\n
Birle\u015fmi\u015f Milletler \u00c7ocuk Haklar\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin 12. maddesi ile \u00c7ocuk Haklar\u0131n\u0131n Kullan\u0131lmas\u0131na \u0130li\u015fkin Avrupa S\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin 3 ve 6. maddeleri, \u0130\u00e7 hukuk taraf\u0131ndan yeterli idrake sahip oldu\u011fu kabul edilen \u00e7ocuklara, kendilerini ilgilendiren davalarda g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerini ifade etmeye olanak tan\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131 ve g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerine gereken \u00f6nemin verilmesi gerekti\u011fini \u00f6ng\u00f6rmektedir. \u00c7ocuklar\u0131n \u00fcst\u00fcn yarar\u0131 gerektirdi\u011fi takdirde g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerinin aksine karar verilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr. Velayet hususu, \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 ilgilendiren konular\u0131n en ba\u015f\u0131nda gelir.<\/p>\n
Ya\u015f\u0131 nedeniyle idrak \u00e7a\u011f\u0131nda bulunan ortak \u00e7ocuk 17.03.2006 do\u011fumlu Berna’n\u0131n velayet tercihini baba y\u00f6n\u00fcnde kullanmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen mahkemece; “annenin k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn geli\u015fiminin sa\u011flanabilece\u011fi ve devam ettirilebilece\u011fi bir ortam olu\u015fturdu\u011fu, \u00e7ocu\u011fun do\u011fumundan itibaren yan\u0131nda bulunan, bak\u0131m ve g\u00f6zetimi ile ilgili olarak maddi ve duygusal gereksinimlerini kar\u015f\u0131lamaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan daval\u0131 anne ile \u00e7ocuk aras\u0131nda kuvvetli bir ba\u011f olu\u015ftu\u011fu, istinabe suretiyle ald\u0131r\u0131lan raporlarda \u00e7ocu\u011fun velayetinin anneye verilmesinin uygun oldu\u011fu \u015feklinde g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f belirtildi\u011fi, \u00e7ocu\u011fun ana bak\u0131m vc \u015fefkatine muhta\u00e7 oldu\u011fu ve ortak \u00e7ocu\u011fun ya\u015f itibari ile idrak \u00e7a\u011f\u0131nda say\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131” gerek\u00e7esiyle velayeti daval\u0131 anneye b\u0131rak\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Yap\u0131lan soru\u015fturma ve toplanan delillerden; ortak \u00e7ocu\u011fun hakim taraf\u0131ndan bizzat dinlendi\u011fi 01.07.2015 tarihinde velayet konusunda g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerini a\u00e7\u0131klama olgunlu\u011funa eri\u015fti\u011fi ve tercihini baba yan\u0131nda kalmak \u015feklinde kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131, al\u0131nan 31.07.2015 tarihli uzman raporuna g\u00f6re baban\u0131n velayet g\u00f6revini yerine getirebilecek \u015fartlara sahip oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmakta olup, \u00e7ocu\u011fun anne ve baba yan\u0131ndaki bar\u0131nma ve ya\u015fama ko\u015fullar\u0131 da de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde velayetinin davac\u0131 babaya b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7ocu\u011fun \u00fcst\u00fcn yarar\u0131na olaca\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen bu durum kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, ortak \u00e7ocu\u011fun velayetinin babaya verilmesine karar vermek gerekirken, yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 do\u011fru olmay\u0131p, bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
SONU\u00c7: Temyiz edilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn yukar\u0131da g\u00f6sterilen sebeple BOZULMASINA, temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131n\u0131n istek halinde yat\u0131rana geri verilmesine, i\u015fbu karar\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren 15 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde karar d\u00fczeltme yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi. 11.04.2017 (Sal\u0131)<\/p>\n
—<\/p>\n
T.C.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay <\/p>\n
2. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n
2016\/10716 E., 2016\/11271 K.<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
MAHKEMES\u0130 :Aile Mahkemesi
\nDAVA T\u00dcR\u00dc : Velayetin De\u011fi\u015ftirilmesi-Velayetin Kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131<\/p>\n
Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki davan\u0131n yap\u0131lan muhakemesi sonunda mahalli mahkemece verilen, yukar\u0131da tarihi ve numaras\u0131 g\u00f6sterilen h\u00fck\u00fcm daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmekle, evrak okunup gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n
Davac\u0131 baba, bo\u015fanma karar\u0131 ile velayeti daval\u0131 anneye b\u0131rak\u0131lan 2001 do\u011fumlu ortak \u00e7ocuk..’nin velayetinin de\u011fi\u015ftirilerek kendisine verilmesini talep etmi\u015f, mahkemece; ” bo\u015fanmadan sonra ilk \u00fc\u00e7 y\u0131l \u00e7ocu\u011fun annesi ile ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131, sonra annesi ile tart\u0131\u015f\u0131p baban\u0131n halas\u0131 ile ya\u015famaya ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve halen \u00e7ocu\u011fun yat\u0131l\u0131 olarak \u00f6\u011frenim g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, daval\u0131 annenin velayet hak ve g\u00f6revini yerine getirmedi\u011fi, \u00e7ocu\u011fun annesinden ayr\u0131ld\u0131ktan sonra uzun s\u00fcredir davac\u0131n\u0131n halas\u0131 ile ya\u015famas\u0131 ve davac\u0131 baban\u0131n yaln\u0131z ya\u015f\u0131yor olmas\u0131 dolay\u0131s\u0131yla davac\u0131 baban\u0131n da \u00e7ocu\u011fu ile yeterince ilgilenmedi\u011fi\u201d gerek\u00e7esiyle, davac\u0131 baban\u0131n velayetin de\u011fi\u015ftirilmesi talebinin reddine, daval\u0131 anne \u00fczerindeki velayetin kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ve vasi tayin edilmek \u00fczere sulh hukuk mahkemesine ihbarda bulunulmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015f, karar daval\u0131 anne taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Velayet hususu, \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 ilgilendiren konular\u0131n en ba\u015f\u0131nda gelir. Velayet d\u00fczenlemesinde; \u00e7ocukla ana ve baba yarar\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7at\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 halinde, \u00e7ocu\u011fun yarar\u0131na \u00fcst\u00fcnl\u00fck tan\u0131nmas\u0131 gereklidir. \u00c7ocu\u011fun yarar\u0131 ise; \u00e7ocu\u011fun bedensel, fikri ve ahlaki bak\u0131mdan en iyi \u015fekilde geli\u015febilmesi ve b\u00f6yle bir geli\u015fmenin ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmesi i\u00e7in, \u00e7ocu\u011fa sosyal, ekonomik ve k\u00fclt\u00fcrel ko\u015fullar\u0131n sa\u011flanm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131d\u0131r. Velayet kamu d\u00fczenine ili\u015fkin olup, re’sen ara\u015ft\u0131rma ilkesi ge\u00e7erlidir. Bu nedenle yarg\u0131lama s\u0131ras\u0131nda meydana gelen geli\u015fmelerin bile g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde tutulmas\u0131 gerekir. Daval\u0131n\u0131n davay\u0131 kabul\u00fc de tek ba\u015f\u0131na hukuki sonu\u00e7 do\u011furmaz.<\/p>\n
Birle\u015fmi\u015f Milletler \u00c7ocuk Haklar\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin 12. ve \u00c7ocuk Haklar\u0131n\u0131n Kullan\u0131lmas\u0131na \u0130li\u015fkin Avrupa S\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin 3 ve 6. maddeleri idrak \u00e7a\u011f\u0131ndaki \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n kendilerini ilgilendiren konularda g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcn al\u0131nmas\u0131 ve g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerine gereken \u00f6nemin verilmesini \u00f6ng\u00f6rmektedir. \u00c7ocuklar\u0131n \u00fcst\u00fcn yarar\u0131 gerektirdi\u011fi takdirde, g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerinin aksine karar verilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
Anne ve baban\u0131n deneyimsizli\u011fi , hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131, ba\u015fka bir yerde bulunmas\u0131 veya benzeri sebeplerle velayet g\u00f6revini gere\u011fi gibi yerine getirememesi: ana ve baban\u0131n \u00e7ocu\u011fa yeterli ilgiyi g\u00f6stermemesi veya ona kar\u015f\u0131 y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerini a\u011f\u0131r bir bi\u00e7imde savsaklamalar\u0131 halinde hakim velayet hakk\u0131n\u0131 kald\u0131rabilir (TMK m. 348).
\nTaraflar hakk\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen sosyal inceleme raporunda m\u00fc\u015fterek \u00e7ocuk; annesinin yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 hatalar nedeniyle onunla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmek istemedi\u011fini, son olarak annesi ile tart\u0131\u015fmas\u0131ndan sonra halas\u0131n\u0131n yan\u0131na gitti\u011fini, bir daha annesi ile g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmek istemedi\u011fini, annesinin kendisini g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmek i\u00e7in arad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ama kabul etmedi\u011fini ifade etmi\u015f, davac\u0131 baba; ortak \u00e7ocu\u011fun annenin yeniden evlenmesi sebebiyle birlikte ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131 annenin yan\u0131ndan ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, daval\u0131 anne ise; davac\u0131 babay\u0131 kendisinin \u015fikayet etmesi nedeniyle baban\u0131n yarg\u0131lan\u0131p hapis cezas\u0131 ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bunun \u00fczerine davac\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7ocu\u011fu kendisine kar\u015f\u0131 kullanmaya ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, \u00e7ocu\u011fun kendisini su\u00e7lad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 babam senin y\u00fcz\u00fcnden hapse girecek dedi\u011fini ve o d\u00f6nem yeniden evlendi\u011fi i\u00e7in \u00e7ocu\u011fun buna da tepki g\u00f6sterdi\u011fini beyan etmi\u015ftir. Toplanan delillerden; taraflar\u0131n 31.10.2011 tarihinde kesinle\u015fen karar \u0130le bo\u015fand\u0131klar\u0131, ortak \u00e7ocu\u011fun velayetinin daval\u0131 anneye b\u0131rak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, davac\u0131 baban\u0131n… Asliye Ceza Mahkemesinin .2009\/159 esas say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131nda \u00e7ocu\u011fun basit cinsel istismar\u0131 su\u00e7undan hapisle cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verildi\u011fi ve daval\u0131 annenin 10.06.2013 tarihinde 2. evlili\u011fini ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirmesinden sonra ortak \u00e7ocu\u011fun ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131 evi terketti\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. \u00c7ocu\u011fun annesi ile, yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 evlilik sebebiyle g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmek istemedi\u011fini bildirmesi, annenin onunla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme iste\u011fine kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k vermemesi ya da \u00e7ocu\u011fun s\u0131nav ba\u015far\u0131 puan\u0131na uygun yat\u0131l\u0131 bir okula yerle\u015ftirilmesi velayetin kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 ya da velayetin de\u011fi\u015ftirilmesini gerektirmez. Bu durumda davan\u0131n t\u00fcmden reddi gerekirken, yetersiz gerek\u00e7e ile yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
SONU\u00c7: Temyiz edilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn yukar\u0131da g\u00f6sterilen sebeple BOZULMASINA, temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131n\u0131n istek halinde yat\u0131rana geri verilmesine, i\u015fbu karar\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren 15 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde karar d\u00fczeltme yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi. 08.06.2016 (\u00c7r\u015f.)<\/p>\n
—<\/p>\n
T.C.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay <\/p>\n
2. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n
2016\/4625 E., 2016\/5411 K.<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
MAHKEMES\u0130 :Asliye Hukuk (Aile) Mahkemesi
\nDAVA T\u00dcR\u00dc : Bo\u015fanma (Velayet)<\/p>\n
Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki davan\u0131n yap\u0131lan muhakemesi sonunda mahalli mahkemece verilen, yukar\u0131da tarihi ve numaras\u0131 g\u00f6sterilen h\u00fck\u00fcm davac\u0131 kad\u0131n taraf\u0131ndan tamam\u0131na y\u00f6nelik olarak temyiz edilmekle, evrak okunup gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n
1- Dosyadaki yaz\u0131lara ve mahkemece uyulan bozma karar\u0131 gere\u011fince h\u00fck\u00fcm verilmi\u015f olmas\u0131na g\u00f6re, davac\u0131 kad\u0131n\u0131n a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki bentlerin kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yersizdir.<\/p>\n
2- Velayet d\u00fczenlemesi yap\u0131l\u0131rken; g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde tutulmas\u0131 gereken temel ilke, “\u00e7ocu\u011fun \u00fcst\u00fcn yarar\u0131” ( BM \u00c7ocuk Haklar\u0131na Dair S\u00f6zle\u015fme m. 3; \u00c7ocuk Haklar\u0131n\u0131n Kullan\u0131lmas\u0131na \u0130li\u015fkin Avrupa S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi m. l; TMK m. 339\/1. 343\/1, 346\/1; \u00c7ocuk Koruma Kanunu m. 4\/b) d\u0131r. \u00c7ocu\u011fun \u00fcst\u00fcn yarar\u0131n\u0131 belirlerken: onun bedensel, zihinsel, ruhsal, ahlaki ve toplumsal geli\u015fiminin sa\u011flanmas\u0131 amac\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6zetilmesi gereklidir. Ana ve baban\u0131n yararlar\u0131; bo\u015fanmadaki kusurlar\u0131, ahlaki de\u011fer yarg\u0131lar\u0131, sosyal konumlar\u0131 gibi durumlar\u0131, \u00e7ocu\u011fun \u00fcst\u00fcn yarar\u0131n\u0131 etkilemedi\u011fi \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde tutulur. M\u00fc\u015fterek \u00e7ocuk … 21.12.2011 do\u011fumludur. \u00c7ocu\u011fun ya\u015f\u0131 g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde anne sevgi, \u015fefkat ve ilgisine muhta\u00e7 \u00e7a\u011fda oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Davadan \u00f6nce ve dava esnas\u0131nda s\u00fcrekli anne yan\u0131nda kalm\u0131\u015f olup annenin velayet g\u00f6revini ihmal etti\u011fi veya k\u00f6t\u00fcye kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin bir tespit bulunmamaktad\u0131r. B\u00fct\u00fcn bu a\u00e7\u0131klamalar kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda; m\u00fc\u015fterek \u00e7ocu\u011fun velayet d\u00fczenlemesi konusundaki \u00fcst\u00fcn yarar\u0131n\u0131n, velayetinin anneye b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131 oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Durum b\u00f6yleyken, mahkemece \u00e7ocu\u011fun ge\u00e7erli \u00fcst\u00fcn yarar\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve uzman raporunda da k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn velayetinin anneye verilmesi gerekti\u011fi belirtildi\u011fi halde, yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde velayetinin daval\u0131 babaya b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131 isabetsiz olmu\u015f ve bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
3-Mahkemece, m\u00fc\u015fterek \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n velayeti babaya b\u0131rak\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, m\u00fc\u015fterek \u00e7ocuklar ile anne aras\u0131nda “ayn\u0131 yerde oturmalar\u0131 hali” ve “ayr\u0131 \u015fehirde oturmalar\u0131” hali i\u00e7in ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. Taraflar ayr\u0131 yerde oturduklar\u0131 ve ula\u015f\u0131m kolayl\u0131\u011f\u0131 dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, ki\u015fisel ili\u015fkiye dair d\u00fczenleme yap\u0131l\u0131rken, taraflar bu hususun dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a talep etmemi\u015flerse, “ayr\u0131 \u015fehir, ayn\u0131 \u015fehir ayr\u0131m\u0131na” gidilmesinin de \u00f6nemi bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Kald\u0131 ki, de\u011fi\u015fen ko\u015fullara g\u00f6re ki\u015fisel ili\u015fkinin yeniden d\u00fczenlenmesi her zaman istenebilir. Mevcut durum ve \u015fartlara g\u00f6re, karde\u015flerin birbirlerini g\u00f6rmelerine de sa\u011flayacak \u015fekilde daha uygun bir ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki kurulmas\u0131 gerekti\u011finden, h\u00fckm\u00fcn bozulmas\u0131 gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
SONU\u00c7: Temyiz edilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn yukar\u0131da 2. ve 3. bentlerde g\u00f6sterilen sebeple BOZULMASINA, bozma kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan temyize konu di\u011fer b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerin ise yukar\u0131da 1. bentte g\u00f6sterilen sebeple ONANMASINA, temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131n\u0131n istek halinde yat\u0131rana geri verilmesine, i\u015fbu karar\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren 15 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde karar d\u00fczeltme yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.16.03.2016 (\u00c7r\u015f.)<\/p>\n
—<\/p>\n
T.C.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay <\/p>\n
20. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n
2016\/9623 E., 2016\/9431 K.<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
MAHKEMES\u0130 :Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesi
\nTaraflar aras\u0131ndaki davada … Aile Mahkemesi ve … Sulh Hukuk Mahkemelerince ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 g\u00f6revsizlik karar\u0131 verilmesi nedeni ile yarg\u0131 yerinin belirlenmesi i\u00e7in g\u00f6nderilen dosya i\u00e7indeki t\u00fcm belgeler incelendi, gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n
K A R A R<\/p>\n
K\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck …’un annesi 28.11.2009 tarihinde vefat etmi\u015ftir. K\u00fc\u00e7\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn day\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n dava a\u00e7mas\u0131 \u00fczerine, … Aile Mahkemesinin 07.02.2013 tarih ve 2012\/897 esas, 2013\/101 karar say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 ile k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn babas\u0131 …’un velayet hakk\u0131 kald\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, … Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesinin 21.02.2013 tarih 2012\/1043 esas, 2013\/431 karar say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 ile de k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fc\u011fe day\u0131s\u0131 … vasi olarak atanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
K\u00fc\u00e7\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn babas\u0131 … Aile Mahkemesine hitaben yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131 dilek\u00e7e ile k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn velayet hakk\u0131n\u0131n day\u0131s\u0131ndan al\u0131narak kendisine verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
… Aile Mahkemesince davac\u0131n\u0131n vesayetin kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin talebinin tefriki ile ayr\u0131 esasa kaydedilmesine karar verilmi\u015f, tefrikten sonra da vesayete ili\u015fkin karar usul\u00fcne uygun bi\u00e7imde kald\u0131r\u0131lmadan, velayetin tevdiine ili\u015fkin dava incelenemeyece\u011finden k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck \u00fczerindeki vesayetin kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 konusunda g\u00f6revsizlik karar\u0131 verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
… Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesince de velayet kavram\u0131n\u0131n daha ehemmiyetli oldu\u011fundan ve velayete ili\u015fkin karar verilmeden vesayetin kald\u0131r\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131ndan bahisle yetkisizlik karar\u0131 verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu’nun 472. maddesine g\u00f6re vesayet, yetkili vesayet makam\u0131n\u0131n karar\u0131yla sona erer. Somut olayda da vesayetin kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermesi gereken mercii, vesayet makam\u0131 olan … Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesidir. Ancak, Aile Mahkemesince velayetin davac\u0131 babaya verilip verilmeyece\u011fi ve bunun sonucu olarak vesayetin kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n gerekip gerekmeyece\u011fi Aile Mahkemesinde yap\u0131lacak yarg\u0131laman\u0131n sonucunda belli olaca\u011f\u0131ndan bu davan\u0131n sonucu bekletici mesele yap\u0131larak vesayetin kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n … Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesince \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmlenmesi gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n
SONU\u00c7: Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle; 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK’n\u0131n 21. ve 22. maddeleri gere\u011fince … Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesinin YARGI YER\u0130 OLARAK BEL\u0130RLENMES\u0130NE 24.10.2016 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oy birli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n
—<\/p>\n
T.C.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay <\/p>\n
2. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n
2016\/4036 E., 2016\/5518 K.<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
MAHKEMES\u0130 :Asliye Hukuk (Aile) Mahkemesi
\nDAVA T\u00dcR\u00dc : Velayetin De\u011fi\u015ftirilmesi-\u00c7ocukla Kurulan Ki\u015fisel \u0130li\u015fkinin Yeniden D\u00fczenlenmesi-Protokol H\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn Yeniden D\u00fczenlenmesi<\/p>\n
Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki davan\u0131n yap\u0131lan muhakemesi sonunda mahalli mahkemece verilen, yukar\u0131da tarihi ve numaras\u0131 g\u00f6sterilen h\u00fck\u00fcm, davac\u0131-daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan, velayetin de\u011fi\u015ftirilmesi davas\u0131n\u0131n reddi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden; daval\u0131-davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan ise, protokol h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn yeniden d\u00fczenlenmesi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden temyiz edilmekle, evrak okunup gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n
1-Dosyadaki yaz\u0131lara, karar\u0131n dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 delillerle kanuni gerektirici sebeplere ve \u00f6zellikle davac\u0131-daval\u0131n\u0131n velayetin de\u011fi\u015ftirilmesi davas\u0131n\u0131n reddedildi\u011finin anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131na g\u00f6re, temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yersizdir.<\/p>\n
2-Daval\u0131-davac\u0131n\u0131n temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesine gelince;<\/p>\n
Velayet hakk\u0131n\u0131 kullanman\u0131n do\u011fal sonucu olarak, velayet hakk\u0131 kendisinde bulunan daval\u0131-davac\u0131 annenin, ortak \u00e7ocukla gerek yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131 gerekse yurt i\u00e7inde seyahat etmesi davac\u0131-daval\u0131 baban\u0131n muvafakat\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 bulunmamaktad\u0131r. M\u00fc\u015fterek \u00e7ocu\u011fun yurt i\u00e7i ve yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131 seyahatlerinin baban\u0131n onay\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 tutulmas\u0131, daval\u0131-davac\u0131 annenin velayet g\u00f6revini yerine getirmesine engel olu\u015fturaca\u011f\u0131 gibi, \u00e7ocu\u011fun seyahat \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn k\u0131s\u0131tlanmas\u0131 sonucunu da do\u011furacakt\u0131r (YHGK 2012\/2-799 esas, 2013\/389 karar ). A\u00e7\u0131klanan sebeplerle, daval\u0131-davac\u0131n\u0131n, davac\u0131-daval\u0131n\u0131n birle\u015fen davas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131 davas\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc gerekirken, yetersiz gerek\u00e7e ile reddi do\u011fru olmay\u0131p, bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
SONU\u00c7: Temyiz edilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn yukar\u0131da (2.) bentte g\u00f6sterilen sebeple BOZULMASINA, bozma kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan temyize konu di\u011fer b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerinin ise uykar\u0131da (1.) bentte g\u00f6sterilen sebeple ONANMASINA, a\u015fa\u011f\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 temyiz ilam harc\u0131n\u0131n temyiz eden \u0130nan’a y\u00fckletilmesine, pe\u015fin harc\u0131n mahsubuna 136.00 TL. temyiz ba\u015fvuru harc\u0131 pe\u015fin al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ba\u015fkaca har\u00e7 al\u0131nmas\u0131na yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131n\u0131n istek halinde yat\u0131ran … ‘ya geri verilmesine, i\u015fbu karar\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren 15 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde karar d\u00fczeltme yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi. 21.03.2016 (Pzt.)<\/p>\n
—<\/p>\n
T.C.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay <\/p>\n
2. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n
2015\/26724 E., 2016\/1488 K.<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
MAHKEMES\u0130 :Asliye Hukuk (Aile) Mahkemesi<\/p>\n
Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki davan\u0131n yap\u0131lan muhakemesi sonunda mahalli mahkemece verilen, yukar\u0131da tarihi ve numaras\u0131 g\u00f6sterilen h\u00fck\u00fcm davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmekle, evrak okunup gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n
Taraflar\u0131n m\u00fc\u015fterek \u00e7ocu\u011fu … 2010 do\u011fumlu olup, bo\u015fanma karar\u0131 ile velayeti daval\u0131 babaya b\u0131rak\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bo\u015fanma karar\u0131ndan sonra, velayet sahibi baba taraf\u0131ndan \u00e7ocu\u011fun ya\u015f\u0131n\u0131n k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck olmas\u0131 ve anne taraf\u0131ndan daha iyi bak\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 inanc\u0131yla, \u00e7ocu\u011fun davac\u0131 annesine b\u0131rak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u00e7ocu\u011fun uzun s\u00fcredir fiilen anne yan\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 toplanan delillerden anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Mahkemece, g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne ba\u015fvurulan uzman da, \u00e7ocu\u011fun velayetinin anneye verilmesinin uygun olaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bildirmi\u015ftir. Dosyada uzman g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnden ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerekli k\u0131lan bir olgu ve delil bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Bu durumda ya\u015f\u0131 itibar\u0131yla ana bak\u0131m ve \u015fefkatine muhta\u00e7 olan, 2010 do\u011fumlu …’\u0131n velayetinin babadan al\u0131narak anneye verilmesi gerekirken, davan\u0131n reddedilmesi isabetsiz olup bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
SONU\u00c7: Temyiz edilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn yukar\u0131da g\u00f6sterilen sebeple BOZULMASINA, temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131n\u0131n istek halinde yat\u0131rana geri verilmesine, i\u015fbu karar\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren 15 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde karar d\u00fczeltme yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi. 01.02.2016 (Pzt.)<\/p>\n
—<\/p>\n
T.C.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay <\/p>\n
2. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n
2016\/22980 E., 2016\/15973 K.<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
MAHKEMES\u0130 :Asliye Hukuk (Aile) Mahkemesi
\nDAVA T\u00dcR\u00dc : Velayetin D\u00fczenlenmesi<\/p>\n
Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki davan\u0131n yap\u0131lan muhakemesi sonunda mahalli mahkemece verilen, yukar\u0131da tarihi ve numaras\u0131 g\u00f6sterilen h\u00fck\u00fcm daval\u0131 baba taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmekle, evrak okunup gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n
Taraflar\u0131n evlilik d\u0131\u015f\u0131 ili\u015fkilerinden 2005 do\u011fumlu…ve 2007 do\u011fumlu …. d\u00fcnyaya gelmi\u015f, daval\u0131 baba k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fckleri tan\u0131m\u0131\u015f, k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fckler baban\u0131n aile n\u00fcfusuna kaydedilmi\u015f, k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn n\u00fcfus kayd\u0131 ile davac\u0131 annenin n\u00fcfus kayd\u0131 aras\u0131nda gerekli ba\u011f kurulmu\u015ftur. Davac\u0131 anne, velayetin kendisine verilmesi amac\u0131yla eldeki davay\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Mahkemece, dava kabul edilerek velayetlerin daval\u0131dan al\u0131narak anneye verilmesine karar verilmi\u015f, h\u00fck\u00fcm daval\u0131 baba taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Bir davada “davac\u0131n\u0131n, dava a\u00e7makta hukuki yarar\u0131n\u0131n bulunmas\u0131” dava \u015fart\u0131d\u0131r [HMK m. 114-(l)-h)]. “Mahkeme, dava \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131n mevcut olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davan\u0131n her a\u015famas\u0131nda kendili\u011finden ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131r. Taraflar da dava \u015fart\u0131 noksanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 her zaman ileri s\u00fcrebilirler. Mahkeme, dava \u015fart\u0131 noksanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 tespit ederse davan\u0131n usulden reddine karar verir. Ancak, dava \u015fart\u0131 noksanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n giderilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn ise bunun tamamlanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in kesin s\u00fcre verir. Bu s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde dava \u015fart\u0131 noksanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 giderilmemi\u015fse davay\u0131 dava \u015fart\u0131 yoklu\u011fu sebebiyle usulden reddeder [HMK m. 115-(1), (2)],<\/p>\n
“Ana ve baba evli de\u011filse velayet anneye aittir” (TMK m.337\/1). Bu yasal d\u00fczenlemeye g\u00f6re, eldeki davada k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fcklerin velayetinin davac\u0131 annede oldu\u011fu tart\u0131\u015fmas\u0131zd\u0131r. Yasa gere\u011fi velayet kendisinde bulunan davac\u0131 annenin, \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131n velayeti i\u00e7in dava a\u00e7mas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmamaktad\u0131r. O halde, mahkemece davan\u0131n, hukuki yararla ilgili dava \u015fart\u0131 yoklu\u011fu sebebiyle usulden reddine karar verilmesi gerekirken, kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi do\u011fru g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f ve bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
SONU\u00c7: Temyiz edilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn yukar\u0131da g\u00f6sterilen sebeple BOZULMASINA, temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131n\u0131n istek halinde yat\u0131rana geri verilmesine, i\u015fbu karar\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren 15 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde karar d\u00fczeltme yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi. 14.12.2016 (\u00c7r\u015f.)<\/p>\n
—<\/p>\n
T.C.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay <\/p>\n
2. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n
2015\/25040 E., 2016\/1042 K.<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
MAHKEMES\u0130 :Aile Mahkemesi
\nDAVA T\u00dcR\u00dc : Velayetin De\u011fi\u015ftirilmesi<\/p>\n
Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki davan\u0131n yap\u0131lan muhakemesi sonunda mahalli mahkemece verilen, yukar\u0131da tarihi ve numaras\u0131 g\u00f6sterilen h\u00fck\u00fcm daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmekle, evrak okunup gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n
K\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck Mehmet 01.01.2005 do\u011fumlu olup, taraflar\u0131n evlilik d\u0131\u015f\u0131 ili\u015fkisinden d\u00fcnyaya gelmi\u015f, davac\u0131 baba taraf\u0131ndan 06.09.2010 tarihinde tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Davac\u0131 baba velayetin anneden al\u0131narak kendisine verilmesini istemi\u015ftir. Ana baba evli de\u011filse velayet anneye aittir (TMK.md.337\/1). Velayet kamu d\u00fczeni ile ilgili olup, daval\u0131n\u0131n davay\u0131 kabul\u00fc tek ba\u015f\u0131na hukuki sonu\u00e7 do\u011furmaz. Mahkemece, taraflara delil g\u00f6stermeleri i\u00e7in s\u00fcre verilmesi, g\u00f6sterdikleri takdirde delillerin toplanmas\u0131, gerekti\u011finde uzman raporu al\u0131n\u0131p idrak \u00e7a\u011f\u0131nda olan \u00e7ocuk da dinlenip, deliller birlikte de\u011ferlendirilerek, sonuca ula\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekirken, daval\u0131n\u0131n kabul beyan\u0131 yeterli g\u00f6r\u00fcl\u00fcp eksik inceleme ile karar verilmesi do\u011fru olmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
SONU\u00c7: Temyiz edilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn yukar\u0131da g\u00f6sterilen sebeple BOZULMASINA, bozma sebebine g\u00f6re sair y\u00f6nlerin incelenmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131n\u0131n istek halinde yat\u0131rana geri verilmesine, i\u015fbu karar\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren 15 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde karar d\u00fczeltme yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi. 20.01.2016 (\u00c7r\u015f.)<\/p>\n
—<\/p>\n
T.C.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay <\/p>\n
2. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n
2015\/17872 E., 2015\/18864 K.<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
MAHKEMES\u0130 :Aile Mahkemesi
\nDAVA T\u00dcR\u00dc : Velayetin De\u011fi\u015ftirilmesi<\/p>\n
Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki davan\u0131n yap\u0131lan muhakemesi sonunda mahalli mahkemece verilen, yukar\u0131da tarihi ve numaras\u0131 g\u00f6sterilen h\u00fck\u00fcm, daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmekle, evrak okunup gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n
Dava velayetin de\u011fi\u015ftirilmesi talebine ili\u015fkindir. Taraflar … Asliye Hukuk (Aile) Mahkemesinin 09.09.2011 tarihinde kesinle\u015fen bo\u015fanma ilam\u0131yla anla\u015fmal\u0131 olarak bo\u015fanm\u0131\u015flar, anla\u015fma uyar\u0131nca velayet davac\u0131 babaya verilmi\u015f, daval\u0131 anne ile m\u00fc\u015fterek \u00e7ocuk aras\u0131nda ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. Daval\u0131 baban\u0131n \u00e7ocu\u011fa kar\u015f\u0131 velayet g\u00f6revini savsaklad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, gereken ilgiyi g\u00f6stermedi\u011fine ve davac\u0131 annenin m\u00fc\u015fterek \u00e7ocukla ki\u015fisel ili\u015fkisini engelledi\u011fine ili\u015fkin dosya kapsam\u0131nda yeterli delil bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Toplanan deliller, velayetin de\u011fi\u015ftirilmesi ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015ftu\u011funu kabule yeterlilikte de\u011fildir. Velayet sahibi baban\u0131n yeniden evlenmesi, tek ba\u015f\u0131na velayetin de\u011fi\u015ftirilmesini gerektirmez. Gerek daval\u0131 baban\u0131n gerekse e\u015finin \u00e7ocu\u011fa k\u00f6t\u00fc muamelede bulundu\u011funa dair bir iddia da mevcut de\u011fildir. Ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen bu durum kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda davac\u0131n\u0131n velayetin de\u011fi\u015ftirilmesine y\u00f6nelik davas\u0131n\u0131n reddi gerekirken, yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi isabetsiz olup, bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
SONU\u00c7: Temyiz edilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn yukar\u0131da g\u00f6sterilen sebeple BOZULMASINA, temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131n\u0131n istek halinde yat\u0131rana geri verilmesine, i\u015fbu karar\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren 15 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde karar d\u00fczeltme yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi. 20.10.2015 (Sal\u0131)<\/p>\n
—<\/p>\n
T.C.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay <\/p>\n
2. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n
2013\/25123 E., 2014\/9293 K.<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
MAHKEMES\u0130 :Samsun 4. Aile Mahkemesi
\nTAR\u0130H\u0130 :27.09.2013
\nNUMARASI :Esas no:2012\/31 Karar no:2013\/438<\/p>\n
Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki davan\u0131n yap\u0131lan muhakemesi sonunda mahalli mahkemece verilen, yukar\u0131da tarihi ve numaras\u0131 g\u00f6sterilen h\u00fck\u00fcm davac\u0131 kad\u0131n taraf\u0131ndan, manevi tazminat, tedbir ile yoksulluk nafakas\u0131n\u0131n reddi ve i\u015ftirak nafakas\u0131n\u0131n miktar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden, daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan ise tamam\u0131na y\u00f6nelik olarak temyiz edilmekle, evrak okunup gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n
1-Dosyadaki yaz\u0131lara, karar\u0131n dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 delillerle kanuna uygun sebeplere ve \u00f6zellikle delillerin takdirinde bir yanl\u0131\u015fl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fclmemesine g\u00f6re, davac\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcm, daval\u0131n\u0131n ise a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki bentlerin kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yersizdir.<\/p>\n
2- Daval\u0131n\u0131n maddi ve manevi tazminat talepleri hakk\u0131nda olumlu veya olumsuz bir karar verilmemesi usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 olup bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
3-Velayet d\u00fczenlemesinde anal\u0131k babal\u0131k duygular\u0131ndan \u00f6nce \u00e7ocu\u011fun menfaatine \u00f6nem verilmelidir. Uzman raporunda da annenin \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma saatleri i\u00e7erisinde \u00e7ocu\u011fun bak\u0131m ve g\u00f6zetimini sa\u011flayacak yeterli olana\u011fa sahip olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u00e7ocu\u011fu i\u015fyerine g\u00f6t\u00fcrmek, arkada\u015flar\u0131na b\u0131rakmak gibi zorluklar\u0131 ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n bak\u0131m ve g\u00f6zetim hususunda kesintisiz yard\u0131m alabilece\u011fi sosyal deste\u011fin olmamas\u0131n\u0131n velayet konusunda olumsuz bir durum olarak de\u011ferlendirildi\u011fi ve velayetin babaya verilmesinin \u00e7ocu\u011fun menfaatine oldu\u011fu belirtilmi\u015ftir. Taraflar\u0131n m\u00fc\u015fterek \u00e7ocu\u011fu 2005 do\u011fumlu Dilara’n\u0131n dava s\u0131ras\u0131nada ge\u00e7ici olarak velayeti 03.07.2012 tarihli ara kararla davac\u0131ya verilmesine ra\u011fmen yarg\u0131lama s\u0131ras\u0131nda \u00e7ocu\u011fun zaman zaman baba ile birlikte kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve daval\u0131 tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131na g\u00f6re \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma saatleri 09:00-21:00 olan davac\u0131 annenin i\u015f yerine \u00e7ocu\u011fu getirmek zorunda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131 ve uzman raporu kapsam\u0131nda; \u00e7o\u00e7u\u011fun 2005 do\u011fumlu oldu\u011fu ve ya\u015f grubu itibariyle anneye olan gereksiniminin de azald\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6zetilerek \u00e7ocu\u011fun menfaati gere\u011fi velayetin daval\u0131 babaya verilmesi gerekirken \u00e7o\u00e7u\u011fun ya\u015f\u0131 ve cinsiyeti itibariyle anne bak\u0131m ve sevgisine muhta\u00e7 oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esi ile velayetinin davac\u0131 anneye verilmesi usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 olup bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir<\/p>\n
SONU\u00c7: Temyiz edilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn yukar\u0131da 2. ve 3. bentlerde g\u00f6sterilen sebeplerle BOZULMASINA, bozma kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan temyize konu b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerin ise yukar\u0131da 1. bentte g\u00f6sterilen sebeple ONANMASINA, a\u015fa\u011f\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 temyiz ilam harc\u0131n\u0131n temyiz eden davac\u0131ya y\u00fckletilmesine, pe\u015fin harc\u0131n mahsubuna 119.00 TL. temyiz ba\u015fvuru harc\u0131 pe\u015fin al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ba\u015fkaca har\u00e7 al\u0131nmas\u0131na yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131n\u0131n istek halinde yat\u0131ran daval\u0131ya geri verilmesine, i\u015fbu karar\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren 15 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde karar d\u00fczeltme yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.17.04.2014 (Pr\u015f.)<\/p>\n
—<\/p>\n
T.C.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay <\/p>\n
2. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n
2013\/20336 E., 2014\/2706 K.<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
MAHKEMES\u0130 :Bolu Aile Mahkemesi
\nTAR\u0130H\u0130 : 31.05.2013
\nNUMARASI :Esas no:2012\/600 Karar no:2013\/369<\/p>\n
Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki davan\u0131n yap\u0131lan muhakemesi sonunda mahalli mahkemece verilen, yukar\u0131da tarihi ve numaras\u0131 g\u00f6sterilen h\u00fck\u00fcm, daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan velayete ili\u015fkin d\u00fczenleme, \u00e7ocuk i\u00e7in h\u00fckmedilen tedbir ve i\u015ftirak nafakas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden temyiz edilmekle, evrak okunup gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n
1-Mahkemece, taraflar\u0131n m\u00fc\u015fterek \u00e7ocu\u011fu Semih’in velayeti davac\u0131 anneye b\u0131rak\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, gerek\u00e7e olarak “\u00e7ocu\u011fun ya\u015f\u0131, bu ya\u015f grubundaki \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n anneye derin duygularla ba\u011fl\u0131 olmas\u0131, anne yan\u0131nda kalmas\u0131n\u0131n bedeni, fikri ve ahlaki geli\u015fimine engel olaca\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ciddi sebep ve delillerin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131” g\u00f6sterilmi\u015ftir.
\nDavac\u0131n\u0131n kocas\u0131 ve \u00e7ocu\u011fuyla birlikte izin i\u00e7in Almanya’dan T\u00fcrkiye’ye geldi\u011finde; \u00e7ocu\u011fu kay\u0131nvalidesine b\u0131rak\u0131p, ilki 17.07.2012 tarihinde, di\u011feri de daha sonra olmak \u00fczere iki kez evlenmeden \u00f6nce tan\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 erkek arkada\u015f\u0131n\u0131n yan\u0131na gitti\u011fi ve onunla ilkinde be\u015f g\u00fcn ikincisinde ise belirlenemeyen bir s\u00fcre birlikte ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ikinci kez terk edip gitmesinden sonra \u00e7ocu\u011fu daval\u0131n\u0131n beraberine al\u0131p Almanya’ya d\u00f6nd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc toplanan delillerden anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. \u00c7ocuk 24.04.2010 do\u011fumludur. Annenin bu ya\u015ftaki bir \u00e7ocu\u011fu yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi b\u0131rak\u0131p gitmesi, \u00e7ocu\u011fa yeterli ilgiyi g\u00f6stermedi\u011fini ve ona kar\u015f\u0131 y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ihmal etti\u011fini ortaya koyar. Bu maddi olgu kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda velayetin anneye b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131 \u00e7ocu\u011fun \u00fcst\u00fcn yarar\u0131 g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde isabetli olmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu bak\u0131mdan velayetin babaya b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekirken yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
2-\u00c7ocu\u011fun dava s\u00fcresince Almanya’da babas\u0131n\u0131n yan\u0131nda oldu\u011fu dosya kapsam\u0131ndan anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Bu durumda \u00e7ocuk i\u00e7in dava s\u00fcresince anne yarar\u0131na tedbir nafakas\u0131na h\u00fckmedilemez. Bu hususun nazara al\u0131nmam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 da do\u011fru bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
SONU\u00c7: Temyiz edilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn yukar\u0131da g\u00f6sterilen sebeple BOZULMASINA, l. bentteki bozma sebebine g\u00f6re i\u015ftirak nafakas\u0131na ili\u015fkin temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131n\u0131n yat\u0131rana geri verilmesine, i\u015fbu karar\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren 15 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde karar d\u00fczeltme yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.13.02.2014 (Per.)<\/p>\n
—<\/p>\n
T.C.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay <\/p>\n
2. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n
2013\/7123 E., 2013\/26501 K.<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
MAHKEMES\u0130 :Batman 2. Asliye Hukuk (Aile) Mahkemesi
\nTAR\u0130H\u0130 :16.1.2013
\nNUMARASI :Esas no:2010\/836 Karar no:2013\/38<\/p>\n
Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki davan\u0131n yap\u0131lan muhakemesi sonunda mahalli mahkemece verilen, yukar\u0131da tarihi ve numaras\u0131 g\u00f6sterilen h\u00fck\u00fcm temyiz edilmekle, evrak okunup gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n
M\u00fc\u015fterek \u00e7ocuk M. E. 06.9.2006 do\u011fumlu olup, ana bak\u0131m ve \u015fefkatine muhta\u00e7 oldu\u011fu \u00e7a\u011fdad\u0131r. Daval\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7ocu\u011fa kar\u015f\u0131 velayet g\u00f6revini savsaklad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ve gereken ilgiyi g\u00f6stermedi\u011fine ili\u015fkin yeterli delil bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi; baban\u0131n \u00e7ocukla ki\u015fisel ili\u015fkisini daval\u0131 annenin engelledi\u011fine ili\u015fkin bir kan\u0131t da bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Toplanan deliller, velayetin de\u011fi\u015ftirilmesini hakl\u0131 k\u0131lacak yeterlilikte de\u011fildir. Velayet sahibi annenin ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131 yeri de\u011fi\u015ftirmesi, tek ba\u015f\u0131na velayetin de\u011fi\u015ftirilmesini gerektirmez. \u00d6yleyse talebin reddi gerekirken, yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi isabetsiz olup, bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
SONU\u00c7: Temyiz edilen karar\u0131n yukar\u0131da g\u00f6sterilen sebeple BOZULMASINA, istek halinde temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131n\u0131n yat\u0131rana geri verilmesine, i\u015fbu karar\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren 15 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde karar d\u00fczeltme yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi. 14.11.2013 (Pr\u015f.)<\/p>\n
—<\/p>\n
T.C.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay <\/p>\n
2. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n
2010\/10784 E., 2011\/1432 K.<\/p>\n
VELAYET<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki davan\u0131n yap\u0131lan muhakemesi sonunda mahalli mahkemece verilen ve yukar\u0131da tarih numaras\u0131 g\u00f6sterilen h\u00fck\u00fcm temyiz edilmekle evrak okunup gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc.<\/p>\n
M\u00fc\u015fterek \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n velayeti kesinle\u015fen bo\u015fanma karar\u0131 ile daval\u0131 babaya verilmi\u015f, davac\u0131 anne velayetin babadan al\u0131narak kendisine verilmesini istemi\u015ftir. Velayet kamu d\u00fczeni ile ilgili olup daval\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc sonu\u00e7 do\u011furmaz.<\/p>\n
Taraflar\u0131n delilleri sorulup, g\u00f6sterdikleri takdirde toplan\u0131p, gerekti\u011finde uzmanlardan rapor al\u0131narak sonucu uyar\u0131nca velayet d\u00fczenlemesi gerekirken daval\u0131n\u0131n kabul beyan\u0131 nazara al\u0131narak ilk oturumda yaz\u0131l\u0131 bi\u00e7imde velayetin babadan al\u0131narak davac\u0131ya takdirine karar verilmesi do\u011fru g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
SONU\u00c7: Temyiz edilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn yukar\u0131da g\u00f6sterilen sebeple BOZULMASINA, istek halinde temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131n\u0131n yat\u0131rana geri verilmesine, i\u015fbu karar\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren 15 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde karar d\u00fczeltme yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.27.01.2011 (Pr\u015f)<\/p>\n
—<\/p>\n
T.C.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay <\/p>\n
2. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n
2011\/2955 E. , 2012\/533 K.<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
MAHKEMES\u0130 :Boyabat Asliye Hukuk (Aile) Mahkemesi
\nTAR\u0130H\u0130 :28.09.2010
\nNUMARASI :Esas no:2010\/440 Karar no:2010\/273<\/p>\n
Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki davan\u0131n yap\u0131lan muhakemesi sonunda mahalli mahkemece verilen ve yukar\u0131da tarih numaras\u0131 g\u00f6sterilen h\u00fck\u00fcm temyiz edilmekle evrak okunup gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc.<\/p>\n
1-Dosyadaki yaz\u0131lara karar\u0131n dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 delillerle kanuna uygun sebeplere ve \u00f6zellikle delillerin takdirinde bir yanl\u0131\u015fl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fclmemesine g\u00f6re daval\u0131n\u0131n a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki bendin kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yersizdir.<\/p>\n
2-Velayet d\u00fczenlemesi yap\u0131l\u0131rken; g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde tutulmas\u0131 gereken temel ilke, \u00e7ocu\u011fun “\u00fcst\u00fcn yarar\u0131” ( BM \u00c7ocuk Haklar\u0131na Dair S\u00f6zle\u015fme md.3; \u00c7ocuk Haklar\u0131n\u0131n Kullan\u0131lmas\u0131na \u0130li\u015fkin Avrupa S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi md.1; TMK. md.339\/1, 343\/1, 346\/1; \u00c7ocuk Koruma Kanunu md. 4\/b) d\u0131r. \u00c7ocu\u011fun \u00fcst\u00fcn yarar\u0131n\u0131 belirlerken; onun bedensel, zihinsel, ruhsal, ahlaki ve toplumsal geli\u015fiminin sa\u011flanmas\u0131 amac\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6zetilmesi gereklidir. Ana ve baban\u0131n yararlar\u0131; bo\u015fanmadaki kusurlar\u0131, ahlaki de\u011fer yarg\u0131lar\u0131, sosyal konumlar\u0131 gibi durumlar\u0131, \u00e7ocu\u011fun \u00fcst\u00fcn yarar\u0131n\u0131 etkilemedi\u011fi \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde tutulur. Annenin sadakat y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ayk\u0131r\u0131 davranmas\u0131 olay\u0131, tek ba\u015f\u0131na anneye velayetin verilmeme nedeni olarak kabul edilemez. \u00c7ocuklardan Y.2003, F. 2005 do\u011fumludur. \u00c7ocuklar\u0131n ya\u015flar\u0131 g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde anne sevgi, \u015fefkat ve ilgisine muhta\u00e7 \u00e7a\u011fda olduklar\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Annenin velayet g\u00f6revini ihmal etti\u011fi kan\u0131tlanm\u0131\u015f de\u011fildir. B\u00fct\u00fcn bu a\u00e7\u0131klamalar kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda; \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n velayet d\u00fczenlemesi konusundaki \u00fcst\u00fcn yarar\u0131n\u0131n, velayetlerinin anneye b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131 oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Durum b\u00f6yleyken mahkemece \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n ge\u00e7erli \u00fcst\u00fcn yararlar\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 halde, yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde velayetlerinin davac\u0131 babaya b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131 isabetsiz olmu\u015f ve bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
SONU\u00c7: Temyiz edilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn yukar\u0131da 2. bentte g\u00f6sterilen sebeple BOZULMASINA, bozma kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan temyize konu b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerinin ise yukar\u0131da l. bentte a\u00e7\u0131klanan sebeplerle ONANMASINA, temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131n\u0131n yat\u0131rana geri verilmesine, i\u015fbu karar\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren 15 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde karar d\u00fczeltme yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi. 17.01.2012 (Sal\u0131.)<\/p>\n
—<\/p>\n
T.C.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay <\/p>\n
2. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n
2007\/3950 E., 2008\/549 K.<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
MAHKEMES\u0130 : Ankara 7. Aile Mahkemesi
\nTAR\u0130H\u0130 : 30.11.2006
\nNUMARASI : Esas no: 2005\/148 Karar no: 2006\/1401<\/p>\n
Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki davan\u0131n yap\u0131lan muhakemesi sonunda mahalli mahkemece verilen ve yukar\u0131da tarih numaras\u0131 g\u00f6sterilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn temyizen m\u00fcrafaa icras\u0131 suretiyle tetkiki istenilmekle duru\u015fma i\u00e7in tayin olunan * 21.01.2008 g\u00fcn\u00fc temyiz eden T. K.. ile vekili Av. F.\u015e..ve kar\u015f\u0131 taraf C. K.. ile vekili Av. D. E.. geldiler. Gelenlerin konu\u015fmas\u0131 dinlendikten sonra i\u015fin incelenerek karara ba\u011flanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in duru\u015fmadan sonraya b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131 uygun g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc. Bug\u00fcn dosyadaki b\u00fct\u00fcn ka\u011f\u0131tlar okunup gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc.<\/p>\n
1-Dosyadaki yaz\u0131lara, karar\u0131n dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 delillerle kanuni gerektirici sebeplere ve \u00f6zellikle * daval\u0131n\u0131n sadakatsizli\u011fi kan\u0131tlanamam\u0131\u015f ise de; bo\u015fanmaya neden olan olaylarda kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131 hakaretleri bulunan taraflar\u0131n e\u015fit kusurlu olduklar\u0131n\u0131n anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f bulunmas\u0131na g\u00f6re daval\u0131n\u0131n a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki bent kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yersizdir.<\/p>\n
2-M\u00fc\u015fterek \u00e7ocuk Alican 2003 do\u011fumlu olup ya\u015f\u0131 gere\u011fi ana bak\u0131m ve ilgisine muhta\u00e7t\u0131r. Do\u011fdu\u011fundan beri daval\u0131 annesiyle kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Annesinin yan\u0131nda kalmaya devam etmesinin \u00e7ocu\u011fun geli\u015fimini olumsuz etkileyece\u011fine dair dosyada inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 delil de bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Velayetin daval\u0131 anneye verilmesi gerekirken, dosya kapsam\u0131na uygun olmayan uzman raporuna dayan\u0131larak yaz\u0131l\u0131 oldu\u011fu \u015fekilde karar verilmesi usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
SONU\u00c7: Temyiz olunan karar\u0131n (2) nolu bentte a\u00e7\u0131klanan sebeple BOZULMASINA, temyize konu di\u011fer y\u00f6nlerin (1) nolu bentte g\u00f6sterilen sebeple ONANMASINA, duru\u015fma i\u00e7in takdir olunan 550.00 YTL. vekalet \u00fccretinin davac\u0131dan al\u0131n\u0131p daval\u0131ya verilmesine, temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131n\u0131n yat\u0131rana geri verilmesine, i\u015f bu karar\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren 15 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde karar d\u00fczeltme yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.28.01.2008 (Pzt.)<\/p>\n
—<\/p>\n
T.C.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay <\/p>\n
2. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n
2007\/3339 E., 2007\/17113 K.<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
MAHKEMES\u0130 :\u015ei\u015fli 4. Aile Mahkemesi
\nTAR\u0130H\u0130 :2.11.2006
\nNUMARASI :Esas no:2005\/21 Karar no:2006\/957<\/p>\n
Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki davan\u0131n yap\u0131lan muhakemesi sonunda mahalli mahkemece verilen ve yukar\u0131da tarih numaras\u0131 g\u00f6sterilen h\u00fck\u00fcm temyiz edilmekle evrak okunup gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc.<\/p>\n
1-Daval\u0131n\u0131n g\u00fcven sars\u0131c\u0131 davran\u0131\u015flarda bulundu\u011fu, davac\u0131 kocan\u0131n da e\u015fine fiziksel \u015fiddet uygulad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmakla; evlilik birli\u011finin temelinden sars\u0131lmas\u0131na neden olan olaylarda taraflar\u0131n e\u015fit kusurlu bulunmalar\u0131na g\u00f6re daval\u0131n\u0131n a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki bendin kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yersizdir.<\/p>\n
2-Ana yan\u0131nda kalmas\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7ocu\u011fun bedeni, fikri, ahlaki geli\u015fmesine engel olaca\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde ciddi ve inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 deliller bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve hemen meydana gelecek tehlikelerin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 da ispat edilmedi\u011fi halde ana bak\u0131m, \u015fefkatine muhta\u00e7 *2003 do\u011fumlu Melih’in T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanununun 182, 336\/2 maddeleri uyar\u0131nca baban\u0131n velayetine b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131 usul ve kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
SONU\u00c7: Temyiz edilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn yukar\u0131da 2. bentte a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle BOZULMASINA, bozma kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan temyize konu b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerinin ise 1. bentte a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle ONANMASINA, temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131n\u0131n yat\u0131rana geri verilmesine, i\u015fbu karar\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren 15 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde karar d\u00fczeltme yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi. 10.12.2007 Pzt.<\/p>\n
—<\/p>\n
T.C.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay <\/p>\n
2. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n
2007\/5526 E. , 2008\/2943 K.<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
MAHKEMES\u0130 :Eski\u015fehir 2.Aile Mahkemesi
\nTAR\u0130H\u0130 :23.1.2007
\nNUMARASI :Esas no:2006\/418 Karar no:2007\/29<\/p>\n
Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki davan\u0131n yap\u0131lan muhakemesi sonunda mahalli mahkemece verilen ve yukar\u0131da tarih numaras\u0131 g\u00f6sterilen h\u00fck\u00fcm velayet y\u00f6n\u00fcnden temyiz edilmekle evrak okunup gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc.<\/p>\n
M\u00fc\u015fterek \u00e7ocuk E.N.. 8.7.2002 do\u011fumlu olup, ya\u015f\u0131 nedeniyle annenin olumsuz davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131n\u0131 anlayamaz. O halde anne bak\u0131m ve \u015fefkatine muhta\u00e7 ya\u015fta bulunan k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn velayetinin anneye verilmesi gerekti\u011finin d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclmemi\u015f olmas\u0131, yaz\u0131l\u0131 gerek\u00e7elerle belirtilen \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 do\u011fru g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
SONU\u00c7: Temyiz olunan h\u00fckm\u00fcn yukar\u0131da g\u00f6sterilen sebeplerle BOZULMASINA, temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131n\u0131n yat\u0131rana geri verilmesine, i\u015f bu karar\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren 15 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde karar d\u00fczeltme yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi. 06.03.2008 (Pr\u015f.)<\/p>\n
—<\/p>\n
T.C.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay <\/p>\n
2. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n
2007\/5526 E., 2008\/2943 K.<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
MAHKEMES\u0130 :Eski\u015fehir 2.Aile Mahkemesi
\nTAR\u0130H\u0130 :23.1.2007
\nNUMARASI :Esas no:2006\/418 Karar no:2007\/29<\/p>\n
Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki davan\u0131n yap\u0131lan muhakemesi sonunda mahalli mahkemece verilen ve yukar\u0131da tarih numaras\u0131 g\u00f6sterilen h\u00fck\u00fcm velayet y\u00f6n\u00fcnden temyiz edilmekle evrak okunup gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc.<\/p>\n
M\u00fc\u015fterek \u00e7ocuk E.N.. 8.7.2002 do\u011fumlu olup, ya\u015f\u0131 nedeniyle annenin olumsuz davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131n\u0131 anlayamaz. O halde anne bak\u0131m ve \u015fefkatine muhta\u00e7 ya\u015fta bulunan k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn velayetinin anneye verilmesi gerekti\u011finin d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclmemi\u015f olmas\u0131, yaz\u0131l\u0131 gerek\u00e7elerle belirtilen \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 do\u011fru g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
SONU\u00c7: Temyiz olunan h\u00fckm\u00fcn yukar\u0131da g\u00f6sterilen sebeplerle BOZULMASINA, temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131n\u0131n yat\u0131rana geri verilmesine, i\u015f bu karar\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren 15 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde karar d\u00fczeltme yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi. 06.03.2008 (Pr\u015f.)<\/p>\n
—<\/p>\n
T.C.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay <\/p>\n
2. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n
2006\/1384 E., 2006\/1955 K.<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
MAHKEMES\u0130 :Sivas l. S.H.
\nTAR\u0130H\u0130 :23.02.2005
\nNUMARASI :47 – 177
\nDAVA T\u00dcR\u00dc :Vasi Atanmas\u0131
\nTEMY\u0130Z EDEN :H. D.<\/p>\n
Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki davan\u0131n yap\u0131lan muhakemesi sonunda mahalli mahkemece verilen ve yukar\u0131da tarih numaras\u0131 g\u00f6sterilen h\u00fck\u00fcm temyiz edilmekle evrak okunup gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc.<\/p>\n
Ana ve baba evli de\u011filse velayet anaya aittir. ( TMK. md. 337\/1 )
\nK\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck L.’nin velisi olan anne S. \u00d6. ak\u0131l hastas\u0131 olup velayet hakk\u0131 12.04.2005 g\u00fcn\u00fc kesinle\u015fen kararla ( Divri\u011fi Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi 2002\/18 esas) kald\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu konu bekletici mesele yap\u0131l\u0131p taraf delilleri toplan\u0131p sonucu uyar\u0131nca karar verilmesi gerekirken eksik inceleme ile yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 do\u011fru g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
S O N U \u00c7: Temyiz edilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn g\u00f6sterilen sebeplerle BOZULMASINA, oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi. 20.02.2006 pzt.<\/p>\n
\u200bVelayet ve ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki d\u00fczenlenirken; g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde tutulmas\u0131 gereken temel ilke, \u00e7ocu\u011fun ‘\u00dcst\u00fcn yarar\u0131d\u0131r’. \u00c7ocu\u011fun \u00fcst\u00fcn yarar\u0131n\u0131 belirlerken; bedensel, zihinsel, ruhsal, ahlaki ve toplumsal geli\u015fiminin sa\u011flanmas\u0131 amac\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6zetilmesi gereklidir. Ana-baban\u0131n yararlar\u0131; bo\u015fanmadaki kusurlar\u0131, ahlaki de\u011fer yarg\u0131lar\u0131, sosyal konumlar\u0131 gibi durumlar\u0131, \u00e7ocu\u011fun \u00fcst\u00fcn yarar\u0131n\u0131 etkilemedi\u011fi \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde tutulur. Velayet d\u00fczenlemesi kamu d\u00fczenine ili\u015fkin olup, re’sen ara\u015ft\u0131rma ilkesi ge\u00e7erlidir.\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi 2021\/3967 E., 2021\/5195 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” MAHKEMES\u0130 : Samsun B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 4. Hukuk Dairesi DAVA T\u00dcR\u00dc : Kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131 Bo\u015fanma-Ziynet Alaca\u011f\u0131 Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki davan\u0131n yap\u0131lan muhakemesi sonunda b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesi hukuk dairesince verilen, yukar\u0131da tarihi ve numaras\u0131 g\u00f6sterilen h\u00fck\u00fcm davac\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 daval\u0131 erkek taraf\u0131ndan; kusur belirlemesi, kad\u0131n yarar\u0131na h\u00fckmedilen yoksulluk nafakas\u0131 ve reddedilen kendi manevi tazminat talebi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden, daval\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 kad\u0131n taraf\u0131ndan ise erke\u011fin davas\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc, kusur belirlemesi, reddedilen tazminat talepleri, yoksulluk nafakas\u0131n\u0131n miktar\u0131 ile velayet d\u00fczenlemesi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden temyiz edilmekle, evrak okunup gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: 1-Daval\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 kad\u0131n\u0131n “Erke\u011fin bo\u015fanma davas\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fcne” y\u00f6nelik temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin incelenmesinde; \u0130lk derece mahkemesince bu y\u00f6ne ili\u015fkin olarak verilen h\u00fck\u00fcm daval\u0131 -kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 kad\u0131n taraf\u0131ndan istinaf edilmeyerek kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir. Bu nedenle daval\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 kad\u0131n\u0131n, istinaf edilmeyerek kesinle\u015fen bu y\u00f6ne ili\u015fkin temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin reddine karar vermek gerekmi\u015ftir. 2-Taraflar\u0131n di\u011fer temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesine gelince; a) Dosyadaki yaz\u0131lara, karar\u0131n dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 delillerle kanuna uygun sebeplere ve \u00f6zellikle delillerin takdirinde bir yanl\u0131\u015fl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fclmemesine g\u00f6re davac\u0131 -kar\u015f\u0131 daval\u0131 erke\u011fin t\u00fcm, daval\u0131 -kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 kad\u0131n\u0131n ise a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki bent kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yersizdir. b) \u0130lk derece mahkemesince kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131 olarak a\u00e7\u0131lan bo\u015fanma davalar\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 sonucunda her iki bo\u015fanma davas\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile taraflar\u0131n bo\u015fanmalar\u0131na, taraflar\u0131n ortak \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 2008 do\u011fumlu …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-92098","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n