T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
A. K. BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/38274)<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 10\/12\/2024<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Recai AKYEL<\/p>\n
Selahaddin MENTE\u015e<\/p>\n
Muhterem \u0130NCE<\/p>\n
Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Fatih ALKAN<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru; tutuklu olan ba\u015fvurucuya kravat verilmemesi nedeniyle \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n, savc\u0131l\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcn tebli\u011f edilmemesi nedeniyle silahlar\u0131n e\u015fitli\u011fi ve \u00e7eli\u015fmeli yarg\u0131lama ilkelerinin ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucu, Fetullah\u00e7\u0131 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc\/Paralel Devlet Yap\u0131lanmas\u0131 (FET\u00d6\/PDY) soru\u015fturmalar\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda 2018 y\u0131l\u0131nda tutuklanm\u0131\u015f ve Osmaniye 1 No.lu T Tipi Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumuna konulmu\u015ftur. \u0130dare ve G\u00f6zlem Kurulunun (Kurul) 17\/7\/2017 tarihli karar\u0131yla h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc ve tutuklular ile kurumun g\u00fcvenli\u011finin sa\u011flanmas\u0131, oda ve eklentiler ile adliye ve hastane sevklerinde asayi\u015fin korunmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla mahpuslar\u0131n yak\u0131nlar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan getirilen kravatlar\u0131n kuruma al\u0131nmamas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fvurucu; duru\u015fmalarda, a\u00e7\u0131k ve kapal\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fler ile \u00f6zel g\u00fcnlerde kravat takmak istedi\u011fini, ilgili Kurulca verilen kravat yasa\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin karar\u0131n hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu ve ailesinin temin edece\u011fi kravat\u0131n kendisine teslim edilmesi gerekti\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrerek s\u00f6z konusu uygulaman\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 talebiyle \u015fik\u00e2yet ba\u015fvurusunda bulunmu\u015ftur. Osmaniye \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi, al\u0131nan idari kararda hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir y\u00f6n\u00fcn bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle 23\/10\/2020 tarihinde \u015fik\u00e2yetin reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. \u0130tiraz talebi, kararda usule ve kanunaayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle Osmaniye 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin 11\/11\/2020 tarihli karar\u0131yla reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. Ba\u015fvurucu, nihai karar\u0131 18\/11\/2020 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frenmi\u015f ve 2\/12\/2020 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
5. Komisyon, ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
6. \u00d6deme g\u00fcc\u00fcnden yoksun oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurucunun adli yard\u0131m talebinin kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
A. \u00d6zel Hayata Sayg\u0131 Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
7. Ba\u015fvurucu; talep etti\u011fi ve yak\u0131nlar\u0131n\u0131n temin edebilece\u011fi bir kravat\u0131n kendisine verilmemesi nedeniyle duru\u015fmalarda ve g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f g\u00fcnlerinde kravat takamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu uygulaman\u0131n ayr\u0131mc\u0131 bir tutuma dayand\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve insanl\u0131k d\u0131\u015f\u0131 muamele te\u015fkil etti\u011fini, mahkemelerce verilen kararlar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinin yetersiz ve hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu belirterek \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n, i\u015fkence ve k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, e\u015fitlik ilkesi ile adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
8. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde; mevcut ba\u015fvuruda ba\u015fvurucunun \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda \u00f6nemli bir zarara u\u011fray\u0131p u\u011framad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve an\u0131lan hakk\u0131n ihlal edilip edilmedi\u011fi konusunda Anayasa Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lacak incelemede Anayasa ve ilgili mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin, Anayasa Mahkemesi i\u00e7tihad\u0131n\u0131n ve somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
9. Anayasa Mahkemesi, K.V. [GK] (B. No: 2014\/2293, 1\/12\/2016) ile Seyfeddin Bahar (B. No: 2014\/10204, 5\/4\/2017) ba\u015fvurular\u0131nda, 30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 48. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda anayasal ve ki\u015fisel \u00f6nemi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck olan veya bulunmayan ba\u015fvurular\u0131n esastan incelenmeksizin reddedilebilece\u011finin h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve an\u0131lan d\u00fczenlemenin kayna\u011f\u0131n\u0131n h\u00e2kimin \u00f6nemsiz ve k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck i\u015flerle u\u011fra\u015fmamas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini ifade eden kadim De minimis non curat praetor ilkesi oldu\u011funu vurgulam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Buna g\u00f6re, Kanun\u2019da anayasal ve ki\u015fisel \u00f6nemden yoksun ba\u015fvurular\u0131n kabul edilemez bulunabilmesi i\u00e7in iki ko\u015ful \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr: Anayasal \u00f6nem olarak adland\u0131r\u0131labilecek olan birinci ko\u015ful ba\u015fvurunun Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n uygulanmas\u0131 ve yorumlanmas\u0131 veya temel haklar\u0131n kapsam\u0131n\u0131n ve s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131mamas\u0131, ki\u015fisel \u00f6nem olarak adland\u0131r\u0131labilecek olan ikinci ko\u015ful ise ba\u015fvurucunun \u00f6nemli bir zarara u\u011framamas\u0131d\u0131r (K.V., \u00a7\u00a7 55-57; Seyfeddin Bahar, \u00a7 26).<\/p>\n
10. Anayasa Mahkemesi, anayasal \u00f6nemin temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklere ili\u015fkin Anayasa h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin yorumlanmas\u0131 ve uygulanmas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131ma \u015feklinde ifade edilebilecek iki unsurunun bulundu\u011funu kabul etmi\u015ftir (K.V., \u00a7 61; Seyfeddin Bahar, \u00a7 27). Ki\u015fisel \u00f6nemin bulunmamas\u0131 ko\u015fulu ise somut olay\u0131n ba\u015fvurucunun ki\u015fisel durumu \u00fczerindeki olumsuz etkisinin derecesiyle ilgilidir. Somut olayda ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan ki\u015fisel zarar\u0131n \u00f6nemli olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ba\u015fvurucunun subjektif alg\u0131s\u0131 belirlemez. Bu husus ba\u015fvurucunun i\u00e7inde bulundu\u011fu ko\u015fullar da d\u00e2hil olmak \u00fczere her olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc ko\u015fullar\u0131 dikkate al\u0131narak ve objektif verilerden hareket edilerek Anayasa Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan de\u011ferlendirilir (K.V., \u00a7\u00a7 66, 67; Seyfeddin Bahar, \u00a7 30). Bu ba\u011flamda Anayasa Mahkemesi, radyo, \u015falvar, \u015fal, k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck makas, para band\u0131, kalemlik, ke\u00e7eli kalem, t\u0131rnak makas\u0131 ve yelek gibi birtak\u0131m e\u015fyalar\u0131n mahpusa g\u00fcvenlik gerek\u00e7esiyle verilmemesi \u015feklindeki uygulaman\u0131n konu edildi\u011fi Murat T\u00fcrk (4) (B. No: 2015\/19665, 28\/6\/2018) ba\u015fvurusunu anayasal ve ki\u015fisel \u00f6nemden yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle kabul edilemez nitelikte bulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
11. Somut olayda ba\u015fvurucunun iddias\u0131, ailesi taraf\u0131ndan temin edilecek kravat\u0131n kendisine teslim edilmesinin ve kravat takma talebinin ceza infaz kurumu taraf\u0131ndan engellenmesi nedeniyle \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkindir. Bu hususta ba\u015fvurucu, g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f g\u00fcnlerinde ve duru\u015fmalarda kravat takamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015f; ba\u015fkaca bir a\u00e7\u0131klamada bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvuruya konu edilen hususun genel bir soruna i\u015faret etmedi\u011fi, Anayasa’n\u0131n uygulanmas\u0131 ve yorumlanmas\u0131 veya temel haklar\u0131n kapsam\u0131n\u0131n ve s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan da \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ortaya konulamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
12. \u00d6te yandan ba\u015fvuruya konu edilen e\u015fyan\u0131n gereklili\u011fi ve bu e\u015fyan\u0131n kullan\u0131lamamas\u0131 durumunda ya\u015fanmas\u0131 muhtemel elem, s\u0131k\u0131nt\u0131 ya da di\u011fer ba\u015fka manevi zorluklar konusunda ba\u015fvurucu taraf\u0131ndan hi\u00e7bir subjektif ve somut a\u00e7\u0131klamada bulunulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Ayr\u0131ca s\u00f6z konusu e\u015fyan\u0131n objektif olarak nitelendirilebilecek nitelikte temel bir ihtiya\u00e7 maddesi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 veya ya\u015famsal bir \u00f6neminin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. Ceza infaz kurumunda tutulmas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 ba\u015fvurucunun birtak\u0131m s\u0131n\u0131rlamalara maruz kalmas\u0131n\u0131n do\u011fal oldu\u011fu ve s\u00f6z konusu uygulaman\u0131n g\u00fcvenlik kayg\u0131s\u0131 do\u011frultusunda s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 \u015fekilde uyguland\u0131\u011f\u0131 da dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, ba\u015fvurucu a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan ne derece gerekli oldu\u011fu hususunda bir herhangi bir a\u00e7\u0131klaman\u0131n yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ba\u015fvuruya konu olan s\u0131n\u0131rlaman\u0131n \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fcl\u00fckten uzak olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmektedir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla s\u00f6z konusu e\u015fyan\u0131n g\u00fcvenlik gerek\u00e7esiyle ba\u015fvurucuya verilmemesinin kendisi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan \u00f6nemli bir zarar do\u011furmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
13. Bu a\u00e7\u0131klamalar \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde Mahkemenin s\u0131kl\u0131kla uygulad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve a\u00e7\u0131k bir i\u00e7tihad\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011fu \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun Anayasa’n\u0131n yorumlanmas\u0131 ve uygulanmas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131, ba\u015fvuru formunda ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen mevcut ko\u015fullarda ba\u015fvurucunun \u00f6nemli bir zarara u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00f6ylenemeyecektir.<\/p>\n
14. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle, ba\u015fvurunun bu k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n anayasal ve ki\u015fisel \u00f6nemden yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle di\u011fer kabul edilebilirlik \u015fartlar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden incelenmeksizin kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
B. Silahlar\u0131n E\u015fitli\u011fi ve \u00c7eli\u015fmeli Yarg\u0131lama \u0130lkelerinin \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
15. Ba\u015fvurucu, savc\u0131l\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcn kendisine tebli\u011f edilmemesi nedeniyle savunma hakk\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131s\u0131tland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
16. Anayasa Mahkemesi, Selahattin Demirta\u015f (4) (B. No: 2017\/27359, 10\/6\/2020, \u00a7\u00a7 33-35) karar\u0131nda; \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine \u015fik\u00e2yet incelemeleri s\u0131ras\u0131nda al\u0131nan savc\u0131l\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcn \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7ilere bildirilmemesinin anayasal \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, i\u00e7eri\u011finde ba\u015fvurucunun cevap vermesini gerektirmeyen ve daha \u00f6nce ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclmemi\u015f yeni bir olgudan bahsedilmeyen durumlarda savc\u0131l\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcn ba\u015fvurucuya bildirilmemesinin \u00f6nemli bir zarara da neden olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade etmi\u015ftir. Somut ba\u015fvuruda, an\u0131lan kararda a\u00e7\u0131klanan ilkelerden ve ula\u015f\u0131lan sonu\u00e7tan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren bir durum bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
17. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle, ba\u015fvurunun bu k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n da anayasal ve ki\u015fisel \u00f6nemden yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle di\u011fer kabul edilebilirlik \u015fartlar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden incelenmeksizin kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Adli yard\u0131m talebinin KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n
B. 1. \u00d6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n anayasal ve ki\u015fisel \u00f6nemden yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
2. Silahlar\u0131n e\u015fitli\u011fi ve \u00e7eli\u015fmeli yarg\u0131lama ilkelerinin ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n anayasal ve ki\u015fisel \u00f6nemden yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
C. 12\/1\/2011 tarihli ve 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu\u2019nun 339. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca tahsil edilmesi ma\u011fduriyetine neden olaca\u011f\u0131ndan adli yard\u0131m talebi kabul edilen ba\u015fvurucunun yarg\u0131lama giderlerini \u00f6demekten TAMAMEN MUAF TUTULMASINA 10\/12\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 10\/12\/2024 tarihli ve 2020\/38274 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR A. K. BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/38274) Karar Tarihi: 10\/12\/2024 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Recai AKYEL Selahaddin MENTE\u015e Muhterem \u0130NCE Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : Fatih ALKAN Ba\u015fvurucu : I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru; tutuklu olan ba\u015fvurucuya kravat verilmemesi nedeniyle \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n, savc\u0131l\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcn tebli\u011f edilmemesi nedeniyle silahlar\u0131n e\u015fitli\u011fi ve \u00e7eli\u015fmeli yarg\u0131lama ilkelerinin ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu, Fetullah\u00e7\u0131 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc\/Paralel Devlet Yap\u0131lanmas\u0131 (FET\u00d6\/PDY) soru\u015fturmalar\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda 2018 y\u0131l\u0131nda tutuklanm\u0131\u015f ve Osmaniye 1 No.lu T Tipi Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumuna konulmu\u015ftur. \u0130dare ve G\u00f6zlem Kurulunun (Kurul) 17\/7\/2017 tarihli karar\u0131yla h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc ve tutuklular ile kurumun g\u00fcvenli\u011finin sa\u011flanmas\u0131, oda ve eklentiler ile adliye ve hastane sevklerinde asayi\u015fin korunmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla mahpuslar\u0131n yak\u0131nlar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan getirilen kravatlar\u0131n kuruma al\u0131nmamas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir. 3. Ba\u015fvurucu; duru\u015fmalarda, a\u00e7\u0131k ve kapal\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fler ile \u00f6zel g\u00fcnlerde kravat takmak istedi\u011fini, ilgili Kurulca verilen kravat yasa\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin karar\u0131n hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu ve ailesinin temin edece\u011fi kravat\u0131n kendisine teslim edilmesi gerekti\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrerek s\u00f6z konusu uygulaman\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 talebiyle \u015fik\u00e2yet ba\u015fvurusunda bulunmu\u015ftur. Osmaniye \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi, al\u0131nan idari kararda hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir y\u00f6n\u00fcn bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle 23\/10\/2020 tarihinde \u015fik\u00e2yetin reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. \u0130tiraz talebi, kararda usule ve kanunaayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle Osmaniye 1. A\u011f\u0131r …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-87237","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n