{"id":76816,"date":"2025-05-05T12:49:00","date_gmt":"2025-05-05T09:49:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uncategorized-tr\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-122-e-2021-4895-k-sayili-karari\/"},"modified":"2025-05-05T12:49:00","modified_gmt":"2025-05-05T09:49:00","slug":"yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-122-e-2021-4895-k-sayili-karari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-122-e-2021-4895-k-sayili-karari\/","title":{"rendered":"Yarg\u0131tay 8. Hukuk Dairesi’nin 2021\/122 E., 2021\/4895 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"

\u00a0T.C.<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay\u00a0<\/p>\n

8. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n

2021\/122 E., 2021\/4895 K.<\/p>\n

“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n

MAHKEMES\u0130 :Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi
\nDAVA T\u00dcR\u00dc : Tapu \u0130ptali Ve Tescil<\/p>\n

Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen ve yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan davada yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonucunda Mahkemece verilen davan\u0131n reddine dair karar\u0131n davac\u0131lar vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine Dairenin 15.01.2020 tarihli ve 2016\/10574 Esas, 2020\/160 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 ile onanmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015fti. Davac\u0131lardan … taraf\u0131ndan s\u00fcresinde karar\u0131n d\u00fczeltilmesi istenmi\u015f olmakla dosya incelendi gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n

KARAR<\/p>\n

Dava dilek\u00e7esinde, taraflar\u0131n k\u00f6k murisi …’in miras\u0131n\u0131n miras\u00e7\u0131lar aras\u0131nda taksim edildi\u011fi ve 867 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n davac\u0131lara isabet etti\u011fi iddia edilerek ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n tapu kayd\u0131n\u0131n iptali ile davac\u0131lar ad\u0131na tescili istenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Cevap dilek\u00e7esi ile miras taksim s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin ge\u00e7ersiz oldu\u011fu beyan edilerek davan\u0131n reddi savunulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

Mahkemece, t\u00fcm miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131n kat\u0131l\u0131m\u0131 ile ge\u00e7erli bir miras taksim s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 (s\u00f6zle\u015fmeyi imzalayan\/parmak basan bir k\u0131s\u0131m miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131n okuma yazma bilmedi\u011fi ve s\u00f6zle\u015fmeyi muhtara ve azalar taraf\u0131ndan imzalanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131) gerek\u00e7esi ile davan\u0131n reddine dair verilen karar\u0131n davac\u0131lar vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine Dairemizin 15.01.2020 tarihli ve 2016\/10574 Esas, 2020\/160 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 ile onanmas\u0131na dair karar\u0131n\u0131n davac\u0131lar vekili taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczeltilmesi istenildi\u011finden dosya yeniden incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Dava, TMK’nin 676.maddesi kapsam\u0131nda miras taksim s\u00f6zle\u015fmesine dayal\u0131 muris … ad\u0131na kay\u0131tl\u0131 867 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n mevcut tapu kayd\u0131n\u0131n iptali ile ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n davac\u0131lar ad\u0131na tescil istemine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n

4721 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu’nun 676. maddesi (M\u00dcLGA 743 say\u0131l\u0131 TKM’nin 611.) uyar\u0131nca miras ortakl\u0131\u011f\u0131na (terekeye) dahil ta\u015f\u0131nmazlara ili\u015fkin miras taksim s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin ge\u00e7erlili\u011fi i\u00e7in t\u00fcm miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131n kat\u0131l\u0131m\u0131 ile adi yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekil yeterlidir. Miras payla\u015f\u0131m\u0131 (taksim) ancak taksim s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u0131rada miras ortakl\u0131\u011f\u0131na dahil, payla\u015f\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f olan miras mallar i\u00e7in s\u00f6z konusudur. Payl\u0131 m\u00fclkiyete d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f ya da di\u011fer miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131n oluruyla bir veya birka\u00e7 miras\u00e7\u0131 ad\u0131na tescil edilen durumlarda miras taksim s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi yap\u0131lmas\u0131 sonu\u00e7 do\u011furmaz.<\/p>\n

Hemen belirtilmelidir ki, TMK’nin 676. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekil, bir ispat ko\u015fulu de\u011fil, ge\u00e7erlilik ko\u015fuludur. TBK’nin 11\/2. maddesine g\u00f6re kanunun emretti\u011fi \u015feklin dereceyi \u015fumul ve tesisi hakk\u0131nda ba\u015fkaca bir h\u00fck\u00fcm tayin olunmam\u0131\u015f ise, akit bu \u015fekle riayet olunmad\u0131k\u00e7a sahih olmaz. \u015eekle ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n m\u00fceyyidesi az \u00f6nce a\u00e7\u0131klanan yasa maddesinde h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere kanunun \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc bir \u015feklin kapsam ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131 hakk\u0131nda ba\u015fka bir h\u00fck\u00fcm konulmam\u0131\u015f ise, \u015fekle uyulmadan yap\u0131lan s\u00f6zle\u015fme h\u00fck\u00fcms\u00fczd\u00fcr. H\u00fck\u00fcms\u00fczl\u00fc\u011fe ba\u011flanan sonu\u00e7 29.9.1988 tarihli ve 2\/2 say\u0131l\u0131 Yarg\u0131tay \u0130\u00e7tihad\u0131 Birle\u015ftirme Karar\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde belirtildi\u011fi gibi; kanun, \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u015fekil \u015fart\u0131 bir ge\u00e7erlilik \u015fart\u0131 olarak d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f bulunmakta ve buna uyulmadan yap\u0131lan s\u00f6zle\u015fmelere ge\u00e7ersizlik m\u00fceyyidesini (hukuki sonucunu) ba\u011flamaktad\u0131r. Kanunda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen \u015fekil \u015fart\u0131 emredici nitelikte oldu\u011fundan, hakim \u015fekil noksanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 her safhada resen g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcne almak zorundad\u0131r. 12.4.1944 tarihli ve 1943\/14 Esas, 1944\/13 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 i\u00e7tihad\u0131 birle\u015ftirme karar\u0131nda da belirtildi\u011fi gibi, ge\u00e7erlili\u011fi \u015fekle ba\u011fl\u0131 s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerde, kanunun \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u015fekle uyulmamas\u0131 s\u00f6zle\u015fmeyi h\u00fck\u00fcms\u00fcz k\u0131lar ve bu husus itiraz nedeni oldu\u011fundan hakim taraf\u0131ndan do\u011frudan do\u011fruya g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcnde tutulur.<\/p>\n

Ancak \u015fekle ba\u011fl\u0131 bir s\u00f6zle\u015fmede, \u015fekle ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak yap\u0131lan s\u00f6zle\u015fme kural olarak ge\u00e7ersiz olmakla birlikte, bu s\u00f6zle\u015fmeden do\u011fan edimler taraflarca tam olarak ifa edilmi\u015f ise, \u015fekil eksikli\u011fi nedeniyle ge\u00e7ersizli\u011fi ileri s\u00fcrmek, hakk\u0131n k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 olu\u015fturur. (Tekinay\/Akman\/Burcuo\u011flu\/Altop :Bor\u00e7lar Hukuku Genel H\u00fck\u00fcmler,7.Bas\u0131, \u0130stanbul 1993 sh.134; ……. :Bor\u00e7lar Hukuku Genel H\u00fck\u00fcmler, Geni\u015fletilmi\u015f 4. Bas\u0131, Ankara, 2004, sh.96 )<\/p>\n

\u015eimdi bu nokta da; “d\u00fcr\u00fcst davranma” ve “hakk\u0131n k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullan\u0131m\u0131” ilkeleri \u00fczerinde durulmas\u0131 gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n

4721 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu’nun \u201cD\u00fcr\u00fcst davranma\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 2. maddesinde; \u201cHerkes, haklar\u0131n\u0131 kullan\u0131rken ve bor\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 yerine getirirken d\u00fcr\u00fcstl\u00fck kurallar\u0131na uymak zorundad\u0131r. Bir hakk\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 hukuk d\u00fczeni korumaz.\u201d h\u00fckm\u00fcne yer verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Buna g\u00f6re; d\u00fcr\u00fcstl\u00fck, herkesin uymas\u0131 gerekli olan genel ve objektif bir davran\u0131\u015f kural\u0131d\u0131r. Bu kural, ki\u015filerin taraf\u0131 olduklar\u0131 hukuki ili\u015fkilerde d\u00fcr\u00fcst, namuslu, ahlakl\u0131 ve di\u011fer ki\u015filerde yarat\u0131lan g\u00fcvenle tutarl\u0131 \u015fekilde davranmalar\u0131n\u0131 ifade eder. Buna g\u00f6re belirli bir hukuki ili\u015fkide d\u00fcr\u00fcstl\u00fck kural\u0131na uygun davran\u0131\u015f; toplumdaki d\u00fcr\u00fcst, namuslu ve orta zekal\u0131 bir ki\u015finin, genel ahl\u00e2k, do\u011fruluk ve kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131 g\u00fcven esaslar\u0131na uygun davran\u0131\u015f bi\u00e7imidir. D\u00fcr\u00fcstl\u00fck kural\u0131na uygun bu davran\u0131\u015f\u0131n belirlenmesinde, toplumda ge\u00e7erli olan genel ahl\u00e2k kurallar\u0131, g\u00fcn\u00fcn adet ve uygulamalar\u0131, davran\u0131\u015f\u0131n s\u00f6z konusu oldu\u011fu hukuki ili\u015fkilerin i\u00e7erik ve ama\u00e7lar\u0131 da dikkate al\u0131nacakt\u0131r (…….: T\u00fcrk \u00d6zel Hukuku 6. Bask\u0131 \u0130stanbul 2011, s.226-227).<\/p>\n

Di\u011fer bir anlat\u0131mla d\u00fcr\u00fcst davranma \u201cbir hak sahibinin hakk\u0131n\u0131 kullan\u0131rken veya bir bor\u00e7lunun borcunu yerine getirirken iyi ve do\u011fru hareket etmesi yani d\u00fcr\u00fcst, namuslu, makul, fiilinin neticesini bilen, orta zekal\u0131 her insan\u0131n benzer hadiselerde takip edecek oldu\u011fu yolda hareket etmesi\u201d anlam\u0131ndad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Bir hakk\u0131n d\u00fcr\u00fcstl\u00fck kural\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 suretiyle ba\u015fkas\u0131na bir zarar verilmesi hakk\u0131n k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullan\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 olu\u015fturur. TMK\u2019nin 2. maddesi h\u00fckm\u00fc herkesin haklar\u0131n\u0131, toplumda ge\u00e7erli do\u011fruluk d\u00fcr\u00fcstl\u00fck ve i\u015f ili\u015fkilerinin gerektirdi\u011fi kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131 g\u00fcven anlay\u0131\u015f\u0131na uygun olarak kullanmas\u0131n\u0131 emreder. Hakk\u0131n kullan\u0131m\u0131 \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fc T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu’na g\u00f6re d\u00fcr\u00fcstl\u00fck kurallar\u0131 verir. Bunun yan\u0131nda ayr\u0131ca hak sahibinin ba\u015fkas\u0131n\u0131 \u0131zrar kast\u0131yla hareket etmi\u015f olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ara\u015ft\u0131rmaya gerek yoktur. \u00d6nemli olan ba\u015fkas\u0131na zarar vermek kast\u0131 de\u011fil, hakk\u0131n d\u00fcr\u00fcstl\u00fck kurallar\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 sonucunda ba\u015fkas\u0131n\u0131n zarar g\u00f6rm\u00fc\u015f olmas\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Bir hakk\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a adaletsizlik olu\u015fturdu\u011fu, ger\u00e7ek hakk\u0131n tan\u0131nmas\u0131 ve bireyin korunmas\u0131 i\u00e7in t\u00fcm hukuki yollar\u0131n kapal\u0131 bulundu\u011fu zorunluluk hallerinde, TMK’nin 2. maddesi uygulama alan\u0131 bulur ve ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc bir imkan sa\u011flar; haks\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131 d\u00fczeltici, yasadaki kurallar\u0131 tamamlay\u0131c\u0131 fonksiyonunu yerine getirir (25.1.1984 tarihli ve 1983\/3 E., 1984\/1 K. say\u0131l\u0131 Yarg\u0131tay \u0130\u00e7tihad\u0131 Birle\u015ftirme Karar\u0131).<\/p>\n

T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu’nun 2. maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen hakk\u0131n k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 yasa\u011f\u0131 kural\u0131n\u0131n amac\u0131, h\u00e2kime \u00f6zel ve istina\u00ee hallerde (adalete uygun d\u00fc\u015fecek \u015fekilde) h\u00fck\u00fcm verme imk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Dosya i\u00e7erisindeki bilgi ve belgelerden, taraflar\u0131n k\u00f6k murisi … o\u011flu …’in 07.01.1984 tarihinde \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc \u00fczerine; murisin e\u015fi … ile \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 …, …, …, … aras\u0131nda 09.09.1984 tarihli miras taksim s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi akdedilmi\u015ftir. \u0130\u015f bu s\u00f6zle\u015fmeyi … d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131n parmak izi bast\u0131\u011f\u0131, s\u00f6zle\u015fme yap\u0131l\u0131rken iki tan\u0131k bulundu\u011fu ancak muhtar ve ihtiyar heyetinin onay\u0131n\u0131n ise olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Miras\u00e7\u0131lar, aralar\u0131nda akdettikleri bu r\u0131zai taksim s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi ile, muris Mehmet’in ilk e\u015finden olma evlatlar\u0131 olan … ve …’e, “…” ve “\u0130ki S\u00f6\u011f\u00fct”ten her ikisi 30 d\u00f6n\u00fcm olmak \u00fczere hisselerine bedel ta\u015f\u0131nmaz ald\u0131klar\u0131 ve ikisinin 15’er d\u00f6n\u00fcm olarak aralar\u0131nda b\u00f6l\u00fc\u015fecekleri, ad\u0131 ge\u00e7en miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131n murisin ba\u015fka mal ve m\u00fclkiyetlerinden hi\u00e7bir alacaklar\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, geri kalan mal ve m\u00fclklerini analar\u0131 ile d\u00f6rt karde\u015fin payla\u015faca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kararla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, dava dilek\u00e7esinde, daval\u0131lar murisleri ve murisin ilk e\u015finden olma evlatlar\u0131 … ile …’in miras taksimi sonucu kendilerine d\u00fc\u015fen bu ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131 \u00fczerlerine kaydettirdikleri , ancak davac\u0131lar\u0131n kendilerine isabet eden 867 parsel ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131 \u00fczerlerine kaydettiremedikleri ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f olup dava konusu edilen ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n Antalya \u0130li Korkuteli \u0130l\u00e7esi Bozova K\u00f6y\u00fc 867 (2013 tarihinde 22\/A \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 ile 351 ada 105 parsel) ile 1963 tarihinde tapulama ile taraflar\u0131n murisi … o\u011flu … ad\u0131na kay\u0131tl\u0131 oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Buna g\u00f6re; dava dilek\u00e7esinde daval\u0131lar murisleri ve murisin ilk e\u015finden olma evlatlar\u0131 … ile …’in miras taksimi sonucu kendilerine isabet eden ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131 adlar\u0131na kaydettirdikleri iddia edildi\u011fine g\u00f6re ge\u00e7ersiz oldu\u011fu kabul edilen 09.09.1984 tarihli miras taksim s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi gere\u011fi muristen, … ile … veya miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131 ad\u0131na intikal yada murise ait herhangi bir ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n tescil edilip edilmedi\u011fi yani daval\u0131lar taraf\u0131ndan ge\u00e7ersiz oldu\u011fu ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen miras taksimine dair edimin ifas\u0131 anlam\u0131nda bir edinme olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 konusunda Mahkemece herhangi bir inceleme ve ara\u015ft\u0131rma yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, iddia edildi\u011fi \u00fczere daval\u0131larca ge\u00e7ersiz oldu\u011fu ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen miras taksimi dolay\u0131s\u0131 ile ta\u015f\u0131nmaz edinilmi\u015f olmas\u0131n\u0131n tespiti halinde art\u0131k s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin \u015fekil \u015fart\u0131na uymad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ge\u00e7ersiz oldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrmenin hakk\u0131n k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullan\u0131m\u0131 mahiyetinde olaca\u011f\u0131 ve bir hakk\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 hukuk d\u00fczeni korumayaca\u011f\u0131 d\u00fcsturuna g\u00f6re taraflar aras\u0131ndaki uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcme kavu\u015fturulmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Bu durumda, Mahkemece, dava dilek\u00e7esinde ileri s\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u00fczere, ge\u00e7erlilik \u015fekil \u015fart\u0131na uymad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in ge\u00e7ersiz kabul edilen 09.09.1984 tarihli miras taksim s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi gere\u011fi … ile … veya miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131 ad\u0131na murise ait herhangi bir ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n intikal veya tespit g\u00f6r\u00fcp g\u00f6rmedi\u011fi hususunda toplanan ve toplanacak deliller kapsam\u0131nda ara\u015ft\u0131rma yap\u0131larak sonucuna g\u00f6re karar verilmesi gerekirken eksik ara\u015ft\u0131rma ve incelemeye dayal\u0131 olarak yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde davan\u0131n reddine karar verildi\u011fi bu defa ki inceleme sonucu do\u011fru g\u00f6r\u00fclmeyerek h\u00fckm\u00fcn bozulmas\u0131 gerekti\u011finden onama karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131larak h\u00fckm\u00fcn bozulmas\u0131na karar vermek gerekmi\u015ftir.
\nSONU\u00c7: Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle davac\u0131lardan …’\u0131n karar d\u00fczeltme itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile Dairemizin 15.01.2020 tarihli ve 2016\/10574 Esas, 2020\/160 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 onama ilam\u0131n\u0131n KALDIRILMASINA, Yerel Mahkeme h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 HMK’nin Ge\u00e7ici 3.maddesi yollamas\u0131yla 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 HUMK’un 428. maddesi uyar\u0131nca BOZULMASINA, HUMK’un 442\/1 maddesi gere\u011fince ayn\u0131 Mahkeme ilam\u0131 ile ilgili bir defadan fazla karar d\u00fczeltme iste\u011finde bulunulamayaca\u011f\u0131ndan ilama kar\u015f\u0131 karar d\u00fczeltme yolu kapal\u0131 bulundu\u011funa, pe\u015fin harc\u0131n istek halinde temyiz edene iadesine, 09.06.2021 tarihinde oy birli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n

\u200bYarg\u0131tay 8. Hukuk Dairesi’nin 09.06.2021 tarihli, 2021\/122 E., 2021\/4895 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n

Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u00a0T.C. Yarg\u0131tay\u00a0 8. Hukuk Dairesi 2021\/122 E., 2021\/4895 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” MAHKEMES\u0130 :Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi DAVA T\u00dcR\u00dc : Tapu \u0130ptali Ve Tescil Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen ve yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan davada yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonucunda Mahkemece verilen davan\u0131n reddine dair karar\u0131n davac\u0131lar vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine Dairenin 15.01.2020 tarihli ve 2016\/10574 Esas, 2020\/160 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 ile onanmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015fti. Davac\u0131lardan … taraf\u0131ndan s\u00fcresinde karar\u0131n d\u00fczeltilmesi istenmi\u015f olmakla dosya incelendi gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: KARAR Dava dilek\u00e7esinde, taraflar\u0131n k\u00f6k murisi …’in miras\u0131n\u0131n miras\u00e7\u0131lar aras\u0131nda taksim edildi\u011fi ve 867 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n davac\u0131lara isabet etti\u011fi iddia edilerek ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n tapu kayd\u0131n\u0131n iptali ile davac\u0131lar ad\u0131na tescili istenmi\u015ftir. Cevap dilek\u00e7esi ile miras taksim s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin ge\u00e7ersiz oldu\u011fu beyan edilerek davan\u0131n reddi savunulmu\u015ftur. Mahkemece, t\u00fcm miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131n kat\u0131l\u0131m\u0131 ile ge\u00e7erli bir miras taksim s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 (s\u00f6zle\u015fmeyi imzalayan\/parmak basan bir k\u0131s\u0131m miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131n okuma yazma bilmedi\u011fi ve s\u00f6zle\u015fmeyi muhtara ve azalar taraf\u0131ndan imzalanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131) gerek\u00e7esi ile davan\u0131n reddine dair verilen karar\u0131n davac\u0131lar vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine Dairemizin 15.01.2020 tarihli ve 2016\/10574 Esas, 2020\/160 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 ile onanmas\u0131na dair karar\u0131n\u0131n davac\u0131lar vekili taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczeltilmesi istenildi\u011finden dosya yeniden incelenmi\u015ftir. Dava, TMK’nin 676.maddesi kapsam\u0131nda miras taksim s\u00f6zle\u015fmesine dayal\u0131 muris … ad\u0131na kay\u0131tl\u0131 867 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n mevcut tapu kayd\u0131n\u0131n iptali ile ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n davac\u0131lar ad\u0131na …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-76816","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nYarg\u0131tay 8. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2021\/122 E., 2021\/4895 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-122-e-2021-4895-k-sayili-karari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Yarg\u0131tay 8. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2021\/122 E., 2021\/4895 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"\u00a0T.C. Yarg\u0131tay\u00a0 8. Hukuk Dairesi 2021\/122 E., 2021\/4895 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” MAHKEMES\u0130 :Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi DAVA T\u00dcR\u00dc : Tapu \u0130ptali Ve Tescil Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen ve yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan davada yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonucunda Mahkemece verilen davan\u0131n reddine dair karar\u0131n davac\u0131lar vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine Dairenin 15.01.2020 tarihli ve 2016\/10574 Esas, 2020\/160 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 ile onanmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015fti. Davac\u0131lardan … taraf\u0131ndan s\u00fcresinde karar\u0131n d\u00fczeltilmesi istenmi\u015f olmakla dosya incelendi gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: KARAR Dava dilek\u00e7esinde, taraflar\u0131n k\u00f6k murisi …’in miras\u0131n\u0131n miras\u00e7\u0131lar aras\u0131nda taksim edildi\u011fi ve 867 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n davac\u0131lara isabet etti\u011fi iddia edilerek ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n tapu kayd\u0131n\u0131n iptali ile davac\u0131lar ad\u0131na tescili istenmi\u015ftir. Cevap dilek\u00e7esi ile miras taksim s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin ge\u00e7ersiz oldu\u011fu beyan edilerek davan\u0131n reddi savunulmu\u015ftur. Mahkemece, t\u00fcm miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131n kat\u0131l\u0131m\u0131 ile ge\u00e7erli bir miras taksim s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 (s\u00f6zle\u015fmeyi imzalayan\/parmak basan bir k\u0131s\u0131m miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131n okuma yazma bilmedi\u011fi ve s\u00f6zle\u015fmeyi muhtara ve azalar taraf\u0131ndan imzalanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131) gerek\u00e7esi ile davan\u0131n reddine dair verilen karar\u0131n davac\u0131lar vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine Dairemizin 15.01.2020 tarihli ve 2016\/10574 Esas, 2020\/160 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 ile onanmas\u0131na dair karar\u0131n\u0131n davac\u0131lar vekili taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczeltilmesi istenildi\u011finden dosya yeniden incelenmi\u015ftir. Dava, TMK’nin 676.maddesi kapsam\u0131nda miras taksim s\u00f6zle\u015fmesine dayal\u0131 muris … ad\u0131na kay\u0131tl\u0131 867 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n mevcut tapu kayd\u0131n\u0131n iptali ile ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n davac\u0131lar ad\u0131na …\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-122-e-2021-4895-k-sayili-karari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-05-05T09:49:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u043e \u0430\u0432\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043e\u043c\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-122-e-2021-4895-k-sayili-karari\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-122-e-2021-4895-k-sayili-karari\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\"},\"headline\":\"Yarg\u0131tay 8. Hukuk Dairesi’nin 2021\/122 E., 2021\/4895 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-05-05T09:49:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-122-e-2021-4895-k-sayili-karari\/\"},\"wordCount\":1950,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Hukuki Haberler\"],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-122-e-2021-4895-k-sayili-karari\/\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-122-e-2021-4895-k-sayili-karari\/\",\"name\":\"Yarg\u0131tay 8. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2021\/122 E., 2021\/4895 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2025-05-05T09:49:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-122-e-2021-4895-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-122-e-2021-4895-k-sayili-karari\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-122-e-2021-4895-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Yarg\u0131tay 8. Hukuk Dairesi’nin 2021\/122 E., 2021\/4895 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"description\":\"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"width\":1080,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\",\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net\"],\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/author\/hukukihabernet\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Yarg\u0131tay 8. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2021\/122 E., 2021\/4895 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-122-e-2021-4895-k-sayili-karari\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Yarg\u0131tay 8. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2021\/122 E., 2021\/4895 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131","og_description":"\u00a0T.C. Yarg\u0131tay\u00a0 8. Hukuk Dairesi 2021\/122 E., 2021\/4895 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” MAHKEMES\u0130 :Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi DAVA T\u00dcR\u00dc : Tapu \u0130ptali Ve Tescil Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen ve yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan davada yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonucunda Mahkemece verilen davan\u0131n reddine dair karar\u0131n davac\u0131lar vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine Dairenin 15.01.2020 tarihli ve 2016\/10574 Esas, 2020\/160 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 ile onanmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015fti. Davac\u0131lardan … taraf\u0131ndan s\u00fcresinde karar\u0131n d\u00fczeltilmesi istenmi\u015f olmakla dosya incelendi gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: KARAR Dava dilek\u00e7esinde, taraflar\u0131n k\u00f6k murisi …’in miras\u0131n\u0131n miras\u00e7\u0131lar aras\u0131nda taksim edildi\u011fi ve 867 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n davac\u0131lara isabet etti\u011fi iddia edilerek ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n tapu kayd\u0131n\u0131n iptali ile davac\u0131lar ad\u0131na tescili istenmi\u015ftir. Cevap dilek\u00e7esi ile miras taksim s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin ge\u00e7ersiz oldu\u011fu beyan edilerek davan\u0131n reddi savunulmu\u015ftur. Mahkemece, t\u00fcm miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131n kat\u0131l\u0131m\u0131 ile ge\u00e7erli bir miras taksim s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 (s\u00f6zle\u015fmeyi imzalayan\/parmak basan bir k\u0131s\u0131m miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131n okuma yazma bilmedi\u011fi ve s\u00f6zle\u015fmeyi muhtara ve azalar taraf\u0131ndan imzalanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131) gerek\u00e7esi ile davan\u0131n reddine dair verilen karar\u0131n davac\u0131lar vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine Dairemizin 15.01.2020 tarihli ve 2016\/10574 Esas, 2020\/160 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 ile onanmas\u0131na dair karar\u0131n\u0131n davac\u0131lar vekili taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczeltilmesi istenildi\u011finden dosya yeniden incelenmi\u015ftir. Dava, TMK’nin 676.maddesi kapsam\u0131nda miras taksim s\u00f6zle\u015fmesine dayal\u0131 muris … ad\u0131na kay\u0131tl\u0131 867 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n mevcut tapu kayd\u0131n\u0131n iptali ile ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n davac\u0131lar ad\u0131na …","og_url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-122-e-2021-4895-k-sayili-karari\/","og_site_name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","article_published_time":"2025-05-05T09:49:00+00:00","author":"Hukuki Haber.net","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u043e \u0430\u0432\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043e\u043c":"Hukuki Haber.net","\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"10 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-122-e-2021-4895-k-sayili-karari\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-122-e-2021-4895-k-sayili-karari\/"},"author":{"name":"Hukuki Haber.net","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822"},"headline":"Yarg\u0131tay 8. Hukuk Dairesi’nin 2021\/122 E., 2021\/4895 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131","datePublished":"2025-05-05T09:49:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-122-e-2021-4895-k-sayili-karari\/"},"wordCount":1950,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Hukuki Haberler"],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-122-e-2021-4895-k-sayili-karari\/","url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-122-e-2021-4895-k-sayili-karari\/","name":"Yarg\u0131tay 8. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2021\/122 E., 2021\/4895 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-05-05T09:49:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-122-e-2021-4895-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-122-e-2021-4895-k-sayili-karari\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2021-122-e-2021-4895-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Yarg\u0131tay 8. Hukuk Dairesi’nin 2021\/122 E., 2021\/4895 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","description":"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","contentUrl":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","width":1080,"height":1080,"caption":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822","name":"Hukuki Haber.net","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Hukuki Haber.net"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net"],"url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/author\/hukukihabernet\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76816","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=76816"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76816\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=76816"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=76816"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=76816"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}