{"id":71255,"date":"2025-04-30T10:14:00","date_gmt":"2025-04-30T07:14:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uncategorized-tr\/iscilik-alacaklari-vekalet-ucreti-karar-ilam-harci\/"},"modified":"2025-04-30T10:14:00","modified_gmt":"2025-04-30T07:14:00","slug":"iscilik-alacaklari-vekalet-ucreti-karar-ilam-harci","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/iscilik-alacaklari-vekalet-ucreti-karar-ilam-harci\/","title":{"rendered":"\u0130\u015e\u00c7\u0130L\u0130K ALACAKLARI –\u00a0VEKALET \u00dcCRET\u0130 –\u00a0KARAR \u0130LAM HARCI"},"content":{"rendered":"

T.C.
\nYARGITAY
\n9. HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130
\nE. 2024\/12498
\nK. 2024\/13848
\nT. 17.10.2024<\/p>\n

\u0130\u015e\u00c7\u0130L\u0130K ALACAKLARI ( Mahkemece Davac\u0131n\u0131n Talebi \u0130le Ba\u011fl\u0131 Olarak \u0130\u015flemi\u015f Olan Yasal Faiz Tutarlar\u0131n\u0131n Hesaplanm\u0131\u015f Olmas\u0131na Kar\u015f\u0131n Bozma \u0130l\u00e2mlar\u0131 Dikkate Al\u0131nmaks\u0131z\u0131n ve Gere\u011fi Yerine Getirilmeksizin S\u00f6z Konusu Yakacak Yard\u0131m\u0131 Ulusal Bayram ve Genel Tatil \u00dccreti \u0130le Fazla \u00c7al\u0131\u015fma \u00dccreti Alacaklar\u0131 Bak\u0131m\u0131ndan Daval\u0131 Taraf\u00e7a Yarg\u0131lama Devam Ederken Hi\u00e7 \u00d6deme Yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f Gibi Alacaklar\u0131n Kabul\u00fcne Karar Verilmi\u015f Olmas\u0131n\u0131n Hatal\u0131 Oldu\u011fu )<\/p>\n

VEKALET \u00dcCRET\u0130 ( Dava Konusu Hafta Tatili \u00dccret Alaca\u011f\u0131 Reddedilmesine Kar\u015f\u0131n Daval\u0131 Lehine Vek\u00e2let \u00dccretine H\u00fckmedilmemesinin Hatal\u0131 Oldu\u011fu )<\/p>\n

KARAR \u0130LAM HARCI ( Konusu Belli Bir De\u011ferle \u0130lgili Bulunan Davalarda H\u00fck\u00fcm Verilmesi H\u00e2linde H\u00fck\u00fcm Alt\u0131na Al\u0131nan Anla\u015fmazl\u0131k Konusu De\u011fer \u00dczerinden Nispi Olarak Karar ve \u0130l\u00e2m Harc\u0131 Al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131\/Nispi Karar ve \u0130l\u00e2m Harc\u0131n\u0131n 1\/4’\u00fc Dava A\u00e7arken Davac\u0131 Taraf\u0131ndan Pe\u015fin Olarak \u00d6dendi\u011fi – Somut Dosyada Davac\u0131 Taraf\u0131ndan 25,20 TL Pe\u015fin Har\u00e7 ve 1.562,18 TL Islah Harc\u0131 Olmak \u00dczere Toplam 1.587,38 TL Har\u00e7 \u00d6dendi\u011fi G\u00f6zetilmeksizin Yaln\u0131zca 25,20 TL Pe\u015fin Har\u00e7 D\u00fc\u015f\u00fclmek Suretiyle Daval\u0131 Taraf\u0131n \u00d6deyece\u011fi Karar ve \u0130l\u00e2m Harc\u0131n\u0131n Yanl\u0131\u015f Hesapland\u0131\u011f\u0131 )<\/p>\n

4857\/m.41,44,46<\/p>\n

\u00d6ZET: Mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan bozmaya uyulmas\u0131na karar verilmesine ve bozma sonras\u0131 al\u0131nan 05.05.2023 tarihli bilirki\u015fi raporunda da Dairemiz bozma il\u00e2mlar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda talep konusu yakacak yard\u0131m\u0131, ulusal bayram ve genel tatil \u00fccreti ile fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccreti alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n 21.01.2016 tarihinde \u00f6denmi\u015f olmakla as\u0131l alacaklar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan davan\u0131n konusuz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n dava \u00f6ncesinde ihtarname ile talep etmesi nedeniyle fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccret alaca\u011f\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan temerr\u00fct tarihi olan 12.05.2014 tarihinden 21.01.2016 \u00f6deme tarihine dek, yakacak yard\u0131m\u0131, ulusal bayram ve genel tatil \u00fccreti bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ise ihtarnamede bu alacaklar\u0131n say\u0131lmamas\u0131 nedeniyle dava tarihinden 21.01.2016 \u00f6deme tarihine dek, davac\u0131n\u0131n talebi ile ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak i\u015flemi\u015f olan yasal faiz tutarlar\u0131n\u0131n hesaplanm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131n, bozma il\u00e2mlar\u0131 dikkate al\u0131nmaks\u0131z\u0131n ve gere\u011fi yerine getirilmeksizin, s\u00f6z konusu yakacak yard\u0131m\u0131, ulusal bayram ve genel tatil \u00fccreti ile fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccreti alacaklar\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan daval\u0131 taraf\u00e7a yarg\u0131lama devam ederken hi\u00e7 \u00f6deme yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f gibi alacaklar\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 hatal\u0131 olup karar\u0131n d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc kez bozulmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Dava konusu hafta tatili \u00fccret alaca\u011f\u0131 reddedilmesine kar\u015f\u0131n daval\u0131 lehine vek\u00e2let \u00fccretine h\u00fckmedilmemesi de hatal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Konusu belli bir de\u011ferle ilgili bulunan davalarda, h\u00fck\u00fcm verilmesi h\u00e2linde h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131nan anla\u015fmazl\u0131k konusu de\u011fer \u00fczerinden nispi olarak karar ve il\u00e2m harc\u0131 al\u0131n\u0131r. Nispi karar ve il\u00e2m harc\u0131n\u0131n 1\/4’\u00fc dava a\u00e7arken davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan pe\u015fin olarak \u00f6denir. Pe\u015fin olarak \u00f6denecek 1\/4 oran\u0131nda karar ve il\u00e2m harc\u0131 dava dilek\u00e7esinde g\u00f6sterilen de\u011fer \u00fczerinden hesaplan\u0131r. Somut dosyada davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan 25,20 TL pe\u015fin har\u00e7 ve 1.562,18 TL \u0131slah harc\u0131, olmak \u00fczere toplam 1.587,38 TL har\u00e7 \u00f6dendi\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmeksizin yaln\u0131zca 25,20 TL pe\u015fin har\u00e7 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fclmek suretiyle daval\u0131 taraf\u0131n \u00f6deyece\u011fi karar ve il\u00e2m harc\u0131n\u0131n yanl\u0131\u015f hesaplanmas\u0131 karardaki bir di\u011fer isabetsiz husustur.<\/p>\n

DAVA : Taraflar aras\u0131nda … Asliye Hukuk (\u0130\u015f) Mahkemesinde g\u00f6r\u00fclen alacak davas\u0131nda verilen karar hakk\u0131nda yap\u0131lan temyiz incelemesi sonucunda, Yarg\u0131tay (Kapat\u0131lan) 22. Hukuk Dairesinin 02.12.2019 tarihli ve 2016\/19828 Esas, 2019\/22033 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 il\u00e2m\u0131 ile karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Mahkemece bozmaya uyularak yeniden yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonucunda 21.09.2021 tarihli karar ile; davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Karar\u0131n taraf vekillerince temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine, Dairenin 23.03.2022 tarihli ve 2022\/587 Esas, 2022\/4017 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 il\u00e2m\u0131 ile ikinci kez bozma karar\u0131 verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Mahkemesince ikinci bozmaya uyularak yeniden yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonucunda; davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Karar\u0131n taraf vekillerince temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine, Dairece 07.12.2022 tarihli ve 2022\/16059 Esas, 2022\/16160 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 il\u00e2m ile \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc kez bozma karar\u0131 verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Mahkeme karar\u0131 daval\u0131 vekili ve kat\u0131lma yolu ile davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmekle; kesinlik, s\u00fcre, temyiz \u015fart\u0131 ve di\u011fer usul eksiklikleri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yap\u0131lan \u00f6n inceleme sonucunda, temyiz dilek\u00e7elerinin kabul\u00fcne karar verildikten ve Tetkik H\u00e2kimi taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan rapor dinlendikten sonra dosyadaki belgeler incelenip gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n

KARAR : I. DAVA<\/p>\n

Davac\u0131 vekili dava dilek\u00e7esinde; m\u00fcvekkilinin daval\u0131 Belediyede 21.07.2003 ile 06.05.2014 tarihleri aras\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, i\u015fyerinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte olan toplu i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinden yararland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesini 15 y\u0131l sigortal\u0131l\u0131k ve 3600 g\u00fcn prim \u00f6deme \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirmesi nedeniyle m\u00fclga 1475 Say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130\u015f Kanunu’nun 14. maddenin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (5). bendi gere\u011fince feshetti\u011fini, fesih bildiriminde bulundu\u011fu ihtarnamede fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccreti ile di\u011fer hak ve alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n da \u00f6denmesini istedi\u011fini ancak \u00f6deme yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrerek k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 ile fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccreti, hafta tatili \u00fccreti, ulusal bayram ve genel tatil \u00fccreti, yakacak yard\u0131m\u0131 alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131dan tahsiline karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

II. CEVAP<\/p>\n

Daval\u0131 vekili cevap dilek\u00e7esinde; zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 def’inde bulunduklar\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n alacak taleplerinin hakl\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve belirsiz alacak davas\u0131na konu edilmelerinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 savunarak davan\u0131n reddini istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

III. MAHKEME KARARI<\/p>\n

Mahkemenin 07.01.2016 tarihli ve 2014\/378 Esas, 2016\/9 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile; davac\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131 … nezdinde 01.09.2014 ile 14.01.2014 tarihleri aras\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesini ya\u015f d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki ko\u015fullar\u0131 sa\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle K\u00fctahya Sosyal G\u00fcvenlik \u0130l M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 15 y\u0131l 3600 g\u00fcn sigortal\u0131l\u0131k s\u00fcresini doldurdu\u011funa dair yaz\u0131y\u0131 ibraz etmek suretiyle m\u00fclga 1475 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 14. maddesi gere\u011fince feshetmi\u015f oldu\u011fu, kamu kurumu olan daval\u0131 i\u015fyerinde sendikal\u0131 olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015farak toplu i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinden yararlanan davac\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131, fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccreti, hafta tatili \u00fccreti, ulusal bayram ve genel tatil \u00fccreti ile yakacak yard\u0131m\u0131 alaca\u011f\u0131 taleplerinde bulundu\u011fu ne var ki davan\u0131n belirsiz alacak k\u0131smi eda k\u00fclli tespit davas\u0131 olarak a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n toplu i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi gere\u011fince ilave \u00f6demeleri bildi\u011fi ancak yakacak yard\u0131m\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan belirsizlik oldu\u011fu ancak k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 tavan tutar\u0131 dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda bu durumun k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirsiz alacak durumuna getirmeyece\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle bu alacak talebi hukuki yarar yoklu\u011fundan ve davac\u0131n\u0131n hafta i\u00e7inde izin kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle hafta tatili alaca\u011f\u0131 esastan reddedilmek suretiyle, di\u011fer \u00fccret alacaklar\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan 13.05.2015 tarihli bilirki\u015fi raporu do\u011frultusunda davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

IV. BOZMA VE BOZMADAN SONRAK\u0130 YARGILAMA S\u00dcREC\u0130<\/p>\n

A. Birinci Bozma Karar\u0131<\/p>\n

1. Mahkemenin 07.01.2016 tarihli yukar\u0131da belirtilen karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde taraf vekilleri temyiz isteminde bulunmu\u015flard\u0131r.<\/p>\n

2. Yarg\u0131tay (Kapat\u0131lan) 22. Hukuk Dairesinin 02.12.2019 tarihli ve 2016\/19828 Esas, 2019\/22033 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile; daval\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcm, davac\u0131n\u0131n sair temyiz itirazlar\u0131 reddedilmek suretiyle; dava dilek\u00e7esinde davan\u0131n belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 t\u00fcr\u00fcnde a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirtildi\u011fi, davac\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma s\u00fcresini ve en son ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00e7\u0131plak \u00fccreti bildi\u011fi ancak, tazminata esas \u00fccretin belirlenmesinde dikkate al\u0131nacak olan yemek ve yakacak yard\u0131mlar\u0131n\u0131n ayni olarak yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden i\u015fin esas\u0131na girilmesi gerekirken, yaz\u0131l\u0131 gerek\u00e7e ile davan\u0131n usulden reddine karar verilmesinin hatal\u0131 oldu\u011fu, dava t\u00fcr\u00fc bak\u0131m\u0131ndan talep konusu ulusal bayram ve genel tatil \u00fccreti ile yakacak yard\u0131m\u0131 alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n tamam\u0131na dava tarihinden itibaren faiz i\u015fletilmesi gerekirken, faiz ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7 tarihlerinin belirlenmesinde dava ve \u0131slah tarihi ayr\u0131m\u0131 yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n hatal\u0131 oldu\u011fu, davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan ke\u015fide edilen 06.05.2014 tarihli ihtarname i\u00e7eri\u011fi dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda bu ihtarnameye konu edilen fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccret alaca\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden temerr\u00fct tarihi olan 12.05.2014 tarihinden itibaren faiz i\u015fletilmesi gerekti\u011fi, bu nedenle h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131nan alacaklara dava ve \u0131slah tarihlerinden itibaren faiz i\u015fletilmesinin isabetsiz bulundu\u011fu gerek\u00e7eleriyle h\u00fckm\u00fcn bozulmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

B. Mahkemece Birinci Bozmaya Uyularak Verilen Karar<\/p>\n

Mahkemenin 21.09.2021 tarihli ve 2020\/58 Esas, 2021\/443 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile; bozma karar\u0131na uyularak yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonucunda; ilk karar tarihinden sonra 21.01.2016 tarihinde daval\u0131 … taraf\u0131ndan davac\u0131ya 1.404,00 TL ulusal bayram ve genel tatil \u00fccreti, 1.050,00 TL yakacak yard\u0131m\u0131 ve 36.007,88 TL fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccreti alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6dendi\u011fine dair \u00f6deme belgelerinin sunuldu\u011fu, as\u0131l alacak ve \u00f6deme tarihine dek i\u015flemi\u015f faiz toplamlar\u0131ndan \u00f6denen tutarlar\u0131n mahsup edilmesi suretiyle bakiye alacak tutarlar\u0131 belirlenmek suretiyle yap\u0131lan hesaplama do\u011frultusunda ve bozma kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan hafta tatili \u00fccreti alaca\u011f\u0131 reddedilmek suretiyle di\u011fer alacaklar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

C. \u0130kinci Bozma Karar\u0131<\/p>\n

1. Mahkemenin 21.09.2021 tarihli yukar\u0131da belirtilen karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde taraf vekilleri temyiz isteminde bulunmu\u015flard\u0131r.<\/p>\n

2. Dairemizin 23.03.2022 tarihli ve 2022\/587 Esas, 2022\/4017 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile; yarg\u0131laman\u0131n devam\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda dava konusu alacaklara y\u00f6nelik \u00f6deme yap\u0131lmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde, \u00f6deme miktar\u0131 ile s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 olarak davan\u0131n konusuz kalm\u0131\u015f olaca\u011f\u0131, bu h\u00e2lde \u00f6denen alacaklar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ret karar\u0131 verilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmay\u0131p “karar verilmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na” karar verilmesi gerekti\u011fi, zira dava tarihinden sonra yap\u0131lan \u00f6demelerin \u00f6deme oran\u0131nda borcu sona erdirdi\u011fi ancak yarg\u0131lama giderinin takdirinde taraflar\u0131n \u201cdavan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihteki hakl\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n\u201d dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 nedeniyle h\u00fckmedilecek vek\u00e2let \u00fccreti ile yarg\u0131lama giderinin tayininde, davac\u0131n\u0131n dava tarihinde hak kazand\u0131\u011f\u0131 toplam alacak tutar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurulmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi, somut uyu\u015fmazl\u0131kta; daval\u0131 i\u015fverence 07.01.2016 olan ilk karar tarihinden sonra temyiz a\u015famas\u0131 devam ederken 21.01.2016 tarihinde davaya konu fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccreti, ulusal bayram ve genel tatil \u00fccreti ile yakacak yard\u0131m\u0131 alacaklar\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak davac\u0131n\u0131n banka hesab\u0131na \u00f6deme yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, temyiz incelemesi sonucunda bozma karar\u0131 verilmesi \u00fczerine Mahkemece bozma il\u00e2m\u0131na uyuldu\u011fu belirtilerek yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama neticesinde, s\u00f6z konusu alacaklara y\u00f6nelik olarak davan\u0131n \u00f6denen tutarlar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan konusuz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilerek ihtarname ile talep edilip edilmedi\u011fi dikkate al\u0131narak yaln\u0131zca alaca\u011f\u0131n temerr\u00fct veya dava tarihinden \u00f6deme tarihine dek i\u015fleyen faizi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ve faiz t\u00fcr\u00fcne g\u00f6re \u00f6denmesi i\u00e7in h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 gerekirken yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde as\u0131l alacak ve i\u015flemi\u015f faiz hesaplamas\u0131 yap\u0131larak \u00f6demelerin mahsup edilmesi suretiyle belirlenen tutarlara g\u00f6re verilen karar\u0131n hatal\u0131 oldu\u011fu, Mahkemece konusuz kalmas\u0131 sebebiyle davan\u0131n esas\u0131 hakk\u0131nda bir karar verilmesine gerek bulunmayan durumlarda, davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihteki taraflar\u0131n hakl\u0131l\u0131k durumuna g\u00f6re vek\u00e2let \u00fccreti ile yarg\u0131lama giderlerine h\u00fckmedilmesi gerekti\u011finin de dikkatten ka\u00e7\u0131r\u0131lmamas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi gerek\u00e7eleri ile karar\u0131n yeniden bozulmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

D. Mahkemece \u0130kinci Bozmaya Uyularak Verilen Karar<\/p>\n

Mahkemenin 06.09.2022 tarihli ve 2022\/246 Esas, 2022\/469 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile; bozmaya uyulmas\u0131na karar verilerek yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama neticesinde, ikinci bozma il\u00e2m\u0131 kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 ile hafta tatili \u00fccreti alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n 21.09.2021 tarihli karar do\u011frultusunda, fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccreti, ulusal bayram ve genel tatil \u00fccreti ile yakacak yard\u0131m\u0131 talepleri bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ise h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nan 13.05.2015 tarihli bilirki\u015fi raporunda hesaplanan tutarlardan daval\u0131 … taraf\u0131ndan davac\u0131n\u0131n banka hesab\u0131na 21.01.2016 tarihinde yap\u0131lan \u00f6demeler d\u00fc\u015f\u00fclmek suretiyle tespit edilen bakiye miktarlar \u00fczerinden k\u0131smen kabul karar\u0131 verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

E. \u00dc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc Bozma Karar\u0131<\/p>\n

1. Mahkemenin 06.09.2022 tarihli yukar\u0131da belirtilen karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde taraflar vekilleri temyiz isteminde bulunmu\u015flard\u0131r.<\/p>\n

2. Dairemizin 07.12.2022 tarihli ve 2022\/16059 Esas, 2022\/16160 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile; Yarg\u0131tay\u0131n bozma karar\u0131na uyulmas\u0131 ile bozma karar\u0131 lehine olan taraf yarar\u0131na bir usuli kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f hak do\u011fabilece\u011fi gibi, baz\u0131 konular\u0131n bozma karar\u0131 kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalmas\u0131 yolu ile de usuli kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f hak ger\u00e7ekle\u015febildi\u011fi, h\u00fckm\u00fcn bir k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n bozma kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n amac\u0131n\u0131n bu k\u0131s\u0131mlar\u0131n do\u011fru oldu\u011funu belirlemek, bozman\u0131n s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7izmek ve bu \u015fekilde usuli kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f haklar\u0131 olu\u015fturup korumak oldu\u011fu, Yarg\u0131tay taraf\u0131ndan bozulan bir h\u00fckm\u00fcn bozma karar\u0131n\u0131n kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalm\u0131\u015f olan k\u0131s\u0131mlar\u0131n\u0131n kesinle\u015fti\u011fi, kesinle\u015fmi\u015f bu k\u0131s\u0131mlar\u0131n lehine olan taraf yarar\u0131na usuli kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f hak olu\u015fturdu\u011fu, somut uyu\u015fmazl\u0131kta Dairemizin 23.03.2022 tarihli bozma il\u00e2m\u0131nda daval\u0131 i\u015fverence 21.01.2016 tarihinde davaya konu fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccreti, ulusal bayram ve genel tatil \u00fccreti ile yakacak yard\u0131m\u0131 alacaklar\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak davac\u0131n\u0131n banka hesab\u0131na \u00f6denen tutarlar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan davan\u0131n konusuz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131, buna g\u00f6re yaln\u0131zca alaca\u011f\u0131n temerr\u00fct veya dava tarihinden \u00f6deme tarihine dek i\u015fleyen faizi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi, bozmaya konu kararda oldu\u011fu \u015fekilde as\u0131l alacak ve i\u015flemi\u015f faiz hesaplamas\u0131 yap\u0131larak \u00f6demelerin mahsup edilmesi suretiyle belirlenen tutarlara g\u00f6re verilen karar\u0131n hatal\u0131 oldu\u011fu, Mahkemece bozma il\u00e2m\u0131na uyulmas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131n h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nan 13.05.2015 tarihli bilirki\u015fi raporunda; br\u00fct 47.687,78 TL fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccreti, br\u00fct 1.963,88 TL ulusal bayram ve genel tatil \u00fccreti ve net 1.050,00 TL yakacak yard\u0131m\u0131 olarak hesap edilen alacaklar\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 net miktar\u0131n daval\u0131 … taraf\u0131ndan davac\u0131n\u0131n banka hesab\u0131na 21.01.2016 tarihinde tam olarak \u00f6denmi\u015f oldu\u011fu g\u00f6zetilmeden fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccreti ile ulusal bayram ve genel tatil \u00fccreti bak\u0131m\u0131ndan br\u00fct olarak belirlenen alacak miktar\u0131ndan net olarak \u00f6denen miktar mahsup edilerek bakiye alacak hesaplanmas\u0131n\u0131n hatal\u0131 oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle karar\u0131n \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc kez bozulmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

H. Mahkemece \u00dc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc Bozmaya Uyularak Verilen Karar<\/p>\n

Mahkemenin yukar\u0131da tarih ve say\u0131s\u0131 belirtilen karar\u0131 ile; bozma il\u00e2mlar\u0131na uyuldu\u011fu belirtilerek yarg\u0131lama devam ederken \u00f6denmekle konusuz kalan \u00fccret alacaklar\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan bilirki\u015fiden ek rapor al\u0131nmak suretiyle alacaklar\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

V. TEMY\u0130Z<\/p>\n

A. Temyiz Yoluna Ba\u015fvuranlar<\/p>\n

Mahkemenin yukar\u0131da tarih ve say\u0131s\u0131 belirtilen karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde daval\u0131 ve kat\u0131lma yolu ile davac\u0131 vekilleri temyiz isteminde bulunmu\u015flard\u0131r.<\/p>\n

B. Temyiz Sebepleri<\/p>\n

1. Daval\u0131 vekili; dava dilek\u00e7esinde davac\u0131ya ayni yemek yard\u0131m\u0131 sa\u011fland\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde bir a\u00e7\u0131klamada bulunulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 buna g\u00f6re tazminata esas \u00fccretin yarg\u0131lama esnas\u0131nda belirlenebilece\u011finden bahisle k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131n\u0131n belirsiz alacak davas\u0131na konu edilebilece\u011finin kabul\u00fcn\u00fcn m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, dosya kapsam\u0131ndan ve \u00f6nceki Yarg\u0131tay bozma il\u00e2mlar\u0131ndan anla\u015f\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere; davac\u0131n\u0131n dava ve talep konusu etti\u011fi yakacak yard\u0131m\u0131, fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccreti ile ulusal bayram ve genel tatil \u00fccreti alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n tamam\u0131 daha \u00f6nce 21.01.2016 tarihinde davac\u0131ya \u00f6denmesi nedeniyle konusuz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 h\u00e2lde bu alacak kalemleri i\u00e7in yeniden h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmu\u015f olmas\u0131n\u0131n usule ve kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu, davac\u0131n\u0131n hafta tatili \u00fccret alaca\u011f\u0131 reddedilmesine ra\u011fmen buna ili\u015fkin daval\u0131 lehine vek\u00e2let \u00fccretine h\u00fckmedilmemesinin hatal\u0131 oldu\u011fu ve \u00f6denmesine karar verilen harc\u0131n yanl\u0131\u015f belirlendi\u011fi gerek\u00e7eleri ile karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131 istemi ile temyiz yoluna ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

2. Davac\u0131 vekili; k\u0131smi \u00f6demelerin 6098 Say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Bor\u00e7lar Kanunu’nun 100. maddesi gere\u011fince \u00f6ncelikle faizlere mahsup edilmesi gerekti\u011fi, faiz ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7 tarihinin temerr\u00fct\u00fcn ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi 12.05.2014 tarihi olmas\u0131 gerekti\u011finin g\u00f6zetilmedi\u011fi ve hafta tatili \u00fccret alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n reddine karar verilmesinin hatal\u0131 oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7eleri ile kat\u0131lma yolu istemi ile temyiz yoluna ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

C. Gerek\u00e7e<\/p>\n

1. Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k ve Hukuki Nitelendirme<\/p>\n

Dosya i\u00e7eri\u011fine, bozman\u0131n mahiyeti ve kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re taraflar aras\u0131ndaki uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k, bozma il\u00e2mlar\u0131n\u0131n gere\u011finin yerine getirilip getirilmedi\u011fi ve bozma ile daval\u0131 lehine olu\u015fan usuli kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f haklara riayet edilip edilmedi\u011fi, vek\u00e2let \u00fccreti ile yarg\u0131lama giderlerinin usule uygun belirlenip belirlenmedi\u011fi hususlar\u0131ndad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

2. \u0130lgili Hukuk<\/p>\n

1. 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu’nun ge\u00e7ici 3. maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131 atf\u0131yla uygulanmas\u0131na devam olunan m\u00fclga 1086 Say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Usul\u00fc Muhakemeleri Kanunu’nun 428. maddesi, 438. maddesinin yedi, sekiz ve dokuzuncu f\u0131kralar\u0131 ile 439. maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131,<\/p>\n

2. 4857 Say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130\u015f Kanunu’nun 41, 44 ve 46. maddeleri.<\/p>\n

3.Dairemizin 15.06.2020 tarihli ve 2020\/1451 Esas, 2020\/5501 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 il\u00e2m\u0131nda usuli kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f hak kavram\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yle a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r:<\/p>\n

“…<\/p>\n

Vermi\u015f oldu\u011fu bir h\u00fck\u00fcm Yarg\u0131tay taraf\u0131ndan bozulan ve Yarg\u0131tay’\u0131n bu bozma karar\u0131na gerek iradi ve gerekse kanuni \u015fekilde uymu\u015f olan yerel mahkeme, bozma karar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda inceleme yapmak ve h\u00fck\u00fcm kurmak zorundad\u0131r. Mahkeme uyma karar\u0131n\u0131 kald\u0131rarak, direnme karar\u0131 veremeyece\u011fi gibi, h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn bozma karar\u0131n\u0131n kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalarak kesinle\u015fmi\u015f olan b\u00f6l\u00fcmleri hakk\u0131nda da farkl\u0131 bir h\u00fck\u00fcm kuramaz. Bozmaya uyulmakla bozma lehine olan taraf yarar\u0131na usul\u00fc kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f hak do\u011fmu\u015f olur. H\u00fckm\u00fcn bir k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n bozma kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n amac\u0131 bu k\u0131s\u0131mlar\u0131n do\u011fru oldu\u011funu belirlemek, bozman\u0131n s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7izmek ve bu \u015fekilde usuli kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f haklar\u0131 olu\u015fturup, korumakt\u0131r. Yarg\u0131tay taraf\u0131ndan bozulan bir h\u00fckm\u00fcn bozma karar\u0131n\u0131n kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalm\u0131\u015f olan k\u0131s\u0131mlar\u0131 kesinle\u015fir. Kesinle\u015fmi\u015f bu k\u0131s\u0131mlar, lehine olan taraf yarar\u0131na usul\u00fc kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f hak olu\u015fturur.”<\/p>\n

3. De\u011ferlendirme<\/p>\n

1. Temyizen incelenen Mahkeme karar\u0131nda ve karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde hukuk kurallar\u0131n\u0131n somut olaya uygulanmas\u0131nda bir isabetsizlik bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve bozmaya uyulmakla kar\u015f\u0131 taraf yarar\u0131na kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f hak durumunu olu\u015fturan y\u00f6nlerin ise yeniden incelenmesine hukuk\u00e7a imk\u00e2n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmakla; davac\u0131 vekilinin t\u00fcm, daval\u0131 vekilinin a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki paragraflar\u0131n kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

2. Mahkemece uyulmas\u0131na karar verilen Dairemizin 07.12.2022 tarihli \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc il\u00e2m\u0131nda; “Dairemizin 23.03.2022 tarihli ikinci il\u00e2m\u0131nda daval\u0131 i\u015fverence 21.01.2016 tarihinde davaya konu fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccreti, ulusal bayram ve genel tatil \u00fccreti ile yakacak yard\u0131m\u0131 alacaklar\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak davac\u0131n\u0131n banka hesab\u0131na \u00f6denen tutarlar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan davan\u0131n konusuz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131, buna g\u00f6re yaln\u0131zca alaca\u011f\u0131n temerr\u00fct veya dava tarihinden \u00f6deme tarihine dek i\u015fleyen faizi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi, bozmaya konu kararda oldu\u011fu \u015fekilde as\u0131l alacak ve i\u015flemi\u015f faiz hesaplamas\u0131 yap\u0131larak \u00f6demelerin mahsup edilmesi suretiyle belirlenen tutarlara g\u00f6re verilen karar\u0131n hatal\u0131 oldu\u011fu belirtilerek bozmaya karar verildi\u011fi, Mahkemece bozma il\u00e2m\u0131na uyulmas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131n h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nan 13.05.2015 tarihli bilirki\u015fi raporunda; br\u00fct 47.687,78 TL fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccreti, br\u00fct 1.963,88 TL ulusal bayram ve genel tatil \u00fccreti ve net 1.050,00 TL yakacak yard\u0131m\u0131 olarak hesap edilen alacaklar\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 net miktar\u0131n daval\u0131 … taraf\u0131ndan davac\u0131n\u0131n banka hesab\u0131na 21.01.2016 tarihinde tam olarak \u00f6denmi\u015f oldu\u011fu g\u00f6zetilmeden fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccreti ile ulusal bayram ve genel tatil \u00fccreti bak\u0131m\u0131ndan br\u00fct olarak belirlenen alacak miktar\u0131ndan net olarak \u00f6denen miktar mahsup edilerek bakiye alacak hesaplanmas\u0131 suretiyle verilen hatal\u0131 oldu\u011fu” belirtilerek Dairenin 23.03.2022 tarihli ikinci bozma il\u00e2m\u0131n\u0131n gere\u011fi yerine getirilmedi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esi ile karar\u0131n \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc kez bozulmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan bozmaya uyulmas\u0131na karar verilmesine ve bozma sonras\u0131 al\u0131nan 05.05.2023 tarihli bilirki\u015fi raporunda da Dairemiz bozma il\u00e2mlar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda talep konusu yakacak yard\u0131m\u0131, ulusal bayram ve genel tatil \u00fccreti ile fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccreti alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n 21.01.2016 tarihinde \u00f6denmi\u015f olmakla as\u0131l alacaklar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan davan\u0131n konusuz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n dava \u00f6ncesinde ihtarname ile talep etmesi nedeniyle fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccret alaca\u011f\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan temerr\u00fct tarihi olan 12.05.2014 tarihinden 21.01.2016 \u00f6deme tarihine dek, yakacak yard\u0131m\u0131, ulusal bayram ve genel tatil \u00fccreti bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ise ihtarnamede bu alacaklar\u0131n say\u0131lmamas\u0131 nedeniyle dava tarihinden 21.01.2016 \u00f6deme tarihine dek, davac\u0131n\u0131n talebi ile ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak i\u015flemi\u015f olan yasal faiz tutarlar\u0131n\u0131n hesaplanm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131n, bozma il\u00e2mlar\u0131 dikkate al\u0131nmaks\u0131z\u0131n ve gere\u011fi yerine getirilmeksizin, s\u00f6z konusu yakacak yard\u0131m\u0131, ulusal bayram ve genel tatil \u00fccreti ile fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccreti alacaklar\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan daval\u0131 taraf\u00e7a yarg\u0131lama devam ederken hi\u00e7 \u00f6deme yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f gibi alacaklar\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 hatal\u0131 olup karar\u0131n d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc kez bozulmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

3. Dava konusu hafta tatili \u00fccret alaca\u011f\u0131 reddedilmesine kar\u015f\u0131n daval\u0131 lehine vek\u00e2let \u00fccretine h\u00fckmedilmemesi de hatal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n

4. Konusu belli bir de\u011ferle ilgili bulunan davalarda, h\u00fck\u00fcm verilmesi h\u00e2linde h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131nan anla\u015fmazl\u0131k konusu de\u011fer \u00fczerinden nispi olarak karar ve il\u00e2m harc\u0131 al\u0131n\u0131r. Nispi karar ve il\u00e2m harc\u0131n\u0131n 1\/4’\u00fc dava a\u00e7arken davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan pe\u015fin olarak \u00f6denir. Pe\u015fin olarak \u00f6denecek 1\/4 oran\u0131nda karar ve il\u00e2m harc\u0131 dava dilek\u00e7esinde g\u00f6sterilen de\u011fer \u00fczerinden hesaplan\u0131r. Somut dosyada davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan 25,20 TL pe\u015fin har\u00e7 ve 1.562,18 TL \u0131slah harc\u0131, olmak \u00fczere toplam 1.587,38 TL har\u00e7 \u00f6dendi\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmeksizin yaln\u0131zca 25,20 TL pe\u015fin har\u00e7 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fclmek suretiyle daval\u0131 taraf\u0131n \u00f6deyece\u011fi karar ve il\u00e2m harc\u0131n\u0131n yanl\u0131\u015f hesaplanmas\u0131 karardaki bir di\u011fer isabetsiz husustur.<\/p>\n

5. Kabule g\u00f6re ise, dosya i\u00e7eri\u011finden davan\u0131n 02.09.2014 tarihinde a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n yarg\u0131lama a\u015famas\u0131nda 27.11.2021 tarihinde \u00f6ld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, davac\u0131 vekilinin davac\u0131 m\u00fcteveffan\u0131n miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131 oldu\u011funu belirtti\u011fi ki\u015filerden vek\u00e2let ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve 02.12.2021 tarihli dilek\u00e7e ekinde miras\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k belgesi (veraset il\u00e2m\u0131) sundu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Davac\u0131n\u0131n yarg\u0131lama s\u0131ras\u0131nda vefat\u0131 \u00fczerine davaya miras\u00e7\u0131lar taraf\u0131ndan devam edilmesi i\u00e7in veraset il\u00e2m\u0131 ve vek\u00e2letname sunulmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen h\u00fckm\u00fcn “daval\u0131dan al\u0131narak davac\u0131 miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131na miras paylar\u0131 oran\u0131nda verilmesine” ibaresi kullan\u0131lmak suretiyle ve k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131n\u0131n da yarg\u0131lama devam ederken … Noterli\u011finin 04.04.2018 tarihli ve 02682 yevmiye numaral\u0131 alaca\u011f\u0131n devri s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi ile \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015fiye temlik edilmesi sebebiyle “daval\u0131dan al\u0131narak temlik alana verilmesine” y\u00f6n\u00fcnde karar verilmesi gerekti\u011fi de g\u00f6zetilmelidir.<\/p>\n

SONU\u00c7 : A\u00e7\u0131klanan sebeplerle;<\/p>\n

Temyiz olunan Mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n BOZULMASINA,<\/p>\n

Pe\u015fin al\u0131nan temyiz karar harc\u0131n\u0131n istek h\u00e2linde ilgililere iadesine,<\/p>\n

Dosyan\u0131n Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmesine, 17.10.2024 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n

kazanci.com<\/p>\n

\u200bMahkemece Davac\u0131n\u0131n Talebi \u0130le Ba\u011fl\u0131 Olarak \u0130\u015flemi\u015f Olan Yasal Faiz Tutarlar\u0131n\u0131n Hesaplanm\u0131\u015f Olmas\u0131na Kar\u015f\u0131n Bozma \u0130l\u00e2mlar\u0131 Dikkate Al\u0131nmaks\u0131z\u0131n ve Gere\u011fi Yerine Getirilmeksizin S\u00f6z Konusu Yakacak Yard\u0131m\u0131 Ulusal Bayram ve Genel Tatil \u00dccreti \u0130le Fazla \u00c7al\u0131\u015fma \u00dccreti Alacaklar\u0131 Bak\u0131m\u0131ndan Daval\u0131 Taraf\u00e7a Yarg\u0131lama Devam Ederken Hi\u00e7 \u00d6deme Yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f Gibi Alacaklar\u0131n Kabul\u00fcne Karar Verilmi\u015f Olmas\u0131n\u0131n Hatal\u0131 Oldu\u011fu\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n

Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

T.C. YARGITAY 9. HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130 E. 2024\/12498 K. 2024\/13848 T. 17.10.2024 \u0130\u015e\u00c7\u0130L\u0130K ALACAKLARI ( Mahkemece Davac\u0131n\u0131n Talebi \u0130le Ba\u011fl\u0131 Olarak \u0130\u015flemi\u015f Olan Yasal Faiz Tutarlar\u0131n\u0131n Hesaplanm\u0131\u015f Olmas\u0131na Kar\u015f\u0131n Bozma \u0130l\u00e2mlar\u0131 Dikkate Al\u0131nmaks\u0131z\u0131n ve Gere\u011fi Yerine Getirilmeksizin S\u00f6z Konusu Yakacak Yard\u0131m\u0131 Ulusal Bayram ve Genel Tatil \u00dccreti \u0130le Fazla \u00c7al\u0131\u015fma \u00dccreti Alacaklar\u0131 Bak\u0131m\u0131ndan Daval\u0131 Taraf\u00e7a Yarg\u0131lama Devam Ederken Hi\u00e7 \u00d6deme Yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f Gibi Alacaklar\u0131n Kabul\u00fcne Karar Verilmi\u015f Olmas\u0131n\u0131n Hatal\u0131 Oldu\u011fu ) VEKALET \u00dcCRET\u0130 ( Dava Konusu Hafta Tatili \u00dccret Alaca\u011f\u0131 Reddedilmesine Kar\u015f\u0131n Daval\u0131 Lehine Vek\u00e2let \u00dccretine H\u00fckmedilmemesinin Hatal\u0131 Oldu\u011fu ) KARAR \u0130LAM HARCI ( Konusu Belli Bir De\u011ferle \u0130lgili Bulunan Davalarda H\u00fck\u00fcm Verilmesi H\u00e2linde H\u00fck\u00fcm Alt\u0131na Al\u0131nan Anla\u015fmazl\u0131k Konusu De\u011fer \u00dczerinden Nispi Olarak Karar ve \u0130l\u00e2m Harc\u0131 Al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131\/Nispi Karar ve \u0130l\u00e2m Harc\u0131n\u0131n 1\/4’\u00fc Dava A\u00e7arken Davac\u0131 Taraf\u0131ndan Pe\u015fin Olarak \u00d6dendi\u011fi – Somut Dosyada Davac\u0131 Taraf\u0131ndan 25,20 TL Pe\u015fin Har\u00e7 ve 1.562,18 TL Islah Harc\u0131 Olmak \u00dczere Toplam 1.587,38 TL Har\u00e7 \u00d6dendi\u011fi G\u00f6zetilmeksizin Yaln\u0131zca 25,20 TL Pe\u015fin Har\u00e7 D\u00fc\u015f\u00fclmek Suretiyle Daval\u0131 Taraf\u0131n \u00d6deyece\u011fi Karar ve \u0130l\u00e2m Harc\u0131n\u0131n Yanl\u0131\u015f Hesapland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ) 4857\/m.41,44,46 \u00d6ZET: Mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan bozmaya uyulmas\u0131na karar verilmesine ve bozma sonras\u0131 al\u0131nan 05.05.2023 tarihli bilirki\u015fi raporunda da Dairemiz bozma il\u00e2mlar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda talep konusu yakacak yard\u0131m\u0131, ulusal bayram ve genel tatil \u00fccreti ile fazla …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-71255","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n\u0130\u015e\u00c7\u0130L\u0130K ALACAKLARI -\u00a0VEKALET \u00dcCRET\u0130 -\u00a0KARAR \u0130LAM HARCI - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/iscilik-alacaklari-vekalet-ucreti-karar-ilam-harci\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u0130\u015e\u00c7\u0130L\u0130K ALACAKLARI -\u00a0VEKALET \u00dcCRET\u0130 -\u00a0KARAR \u0130LAM HARCI\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"T.C. YARGITAY 9. HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130 E. 2024\/12498 K. 2024\/13848 T. 17.10.2024 \u0130\u015e\u00c7\u0130L\u0130K ALACAKLARI ( Mahkemece Davac\u0131n\u0131n Talebi \u0130le Ba\u011fl\u0131 Olarak \u0130\u015flemi\u015f Olan Yasal Faiz Tutarlar\u0131n\u0131n Hesaplanm\u0131\u015f Olmas\u0131na Kar\u015f\u0131n Bozma \u0130l\u00e2mlar\u0131 Dikkate Al\u0131nmaks\u0131z\u0131n ve Gere\u011fi Yerine Getirilmeksizin S\u00f6z Konusu Yakacak Yard\u0131m\u0131 Ulusal Bayram ve Genel Tatil \u00dccreti \u0130le Fazla \u00c7al\u0131\u015fma \u00dccreti Alacaklar\u0131 Bak\u0131m\u0131ndan Daval\u0131 Taraf\u00e7a Yarg\u0131lama Devam Ederken Hi\u00e7 \u00d6deme Yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f Gibi Alacaklar\u0131n Kabul\u00fcne Karar Verilmi\u015f Olmas\u0131n\u0131n Hatal\u0131 Oldu\u011fu ) VEKALET \u00dcCRET\u0130 ( Dava Konusu Hafta Tatili \u00dccret Alaca\u011f\u0131 Reddedilmesine Kar\u015f\u0131n Daval\u0131 Lehine Vek\u00e2let \u00dccretine H\u00fckmedilmemesinin Hatal\u0131 Oldu\u011fu ) KARAR \u0130LAM HARCI ( Konusu Belli Bir De\u011ferle \u0130lgili Bulunan Davalarda H\u00fck\u00fcm Verilmesi H\u00e2linde H\u00fck\u00fcm Alt\u0131na Al\u0131nan Anla\u015fmazl\u0131k Konusu De\u011fer \u00dczerinden Nispi Olarak Karar ve \u0130l\u00e2m Harc\u0131 Al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131\/Nispi Karar ve \u0130l\u00e2m Harc\u0131n\u0131n 1\/4’\u00fc Dava A\u00e7arken Davac\u0131 Taraf\u0131ndan Pe\u015fin Olarak \u00d6dendi\u011fi – Somut Dosyada Davac\u0131 Taraf\u0131ndan 25,20 TL Pe\u015fin Har\u00e7 ve 1.562,18 TL Islah Harc\u0131 Olmak \u00dczere Toplam 1.587,38 TL Har\u00e7 \u00d6dendi\u011fi G\u00f6zetilmeksizin Yaln\u0131zca 25,20 TL Pe\u015fin Har\u00e7 D\u00fc\u015f\u00fclmek Suretiyle Daval\u0131 Taraf\u0131n \u00d6deyece\u011fi Karar ve \u0130l\u00e2m Harc\u0131n\u0131n Yanl\u0131\u015f Hesapland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ) 4857\/m.41,44,46 \u00d6ZET: Mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan bozmaya uyulmas\u0131na karar verilmesine ve bozma sonras\u0131 al\u0131nan 05.05.2023 tarihli bilirki\u015fi raporunda da Dairemiz bozma il\u00e2mlar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda talep konusu yakacak yard\u0131m\u0131, ulusal bayram ve genel tatil \u00fccreti ile fazla …\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/iscilik-alacaklari-vekalet-ucreti-karar-ilam-harci\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-04-30T07:14:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u043e \u0430\u0432\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043e\u043c\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"20 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/iscilik-alacaklari-vekalet-ucreti-karar-ilam-harci\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/iscilik-alacaklari-vekalet-ucreti-karar-ilam-harci\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\"},\"headline\":\"\u0130\u015e\u00c7\u0130L\u0130K ALACAKLARI –\u00a0VEKALET \u00dcCRET\u0130 –\u00a0KARAR \u0130LAM HARCI\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-04-30T07:14:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/iscilik-alacaklari-vekalet-ucreti-karar-ilam-harci\/\"},\"wordCount\":3985,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Hukuki Haberler\"],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/iscilik-alacaklari-vekalet-ucreti-karar-ilam-harci\/\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/iscilik-alacaklari-vekalet-ucreti-karar-ilam-harci\/\",\"name\":\"\u0130\u015e\u00c7\u0130L\u0130K ALACAKLARI -\u00a0VEKALET \u00dcCRET\u0130 -\u00a0KARAR \u0130LAM HARCI - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2025-04-30T07:14:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/iscilik-alacaklari-vekalet-ucreti-karar-ilam-harci\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/iscilik-alacaklari-vekalet-ucreti-karar-ilam-harci\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/iscilik-alacaklari-vekalet-ucreti-karar-ilam-harci\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u0130\u015e\u00c7\u0130L\u0130K ALACAKLARI –\u00a0VEKALET \u00dcCRET\u0130 –\u00a0KARAR \u0130LAM HARCI\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"description\":\"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"width\":1080,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\",\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net\"],\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/author\/hukukihabernet\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"\u0130\u015e\u00c7\u0130L\u0130K ALACAKLARI -\u00a0VEKALET \u00dcCRET\u0130 -\u00a0KARAR \u0130LAM HARCI - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/iscilik-alacaklari-vekalet-ucreti-karar-ilam-harci\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u0130\u015e\u00c7\u0130L\u0130K ALACAKLARI -\u00a0VEKALET \u00dcCRET\u0130 -\u00a0KARAR \u0130LAM HARCI","og_description":"T.C. YARGITAY 9. HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130 E. 2024\/12498 K. 2024\/13848 T. 17.10.2024 \u0130\u015e\u00c7\u0130L\u0130K ALACAKLARI ( Mahkemece Davac\u0131n\u0131n Talebi \u0130le Ba\u011fl\u0131 Olarak \u0130\u015flemi\u015f Olan Yasal Faiz Tutarlar\u0131n\u0131n Hesaplanm\u0131\u015f Olmas\u0131na Kar\u015f\u0131n Bozma \u0130l\u00e2mlar\u0131 Dikkate Al\u0131nmaks\u0131z\u0131n ve Gere\u011fi Yerine Getirilmeksizin S\u00f6z Konusu Yakacak Yard\u0131m\u0131 Ulusal Bayram ve Genel Tatil \u00dccreti \u0130le Fazla \u00c7al\u0131\u015fma \u00dccreti Alacaklar\u0131 Bak\u0131m\u0131ndan Daval\u0131 Taraf\u00e7a Yarg\u0131lama Devam Ederken Hi\u00e7 \u00d6deme Yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f Gibi Alacaklar\u0131n Kabul\u00fcne Karar Verilmi\u015f Olmas\u0131n\u0131n Hatal\u0131 Oldu\u011fu ) VEKALET \u00dcCRET\u0130 ( Dava Konusu Hafta Tatili \u00dccret Alaca\u011f\u0131 Reddedilmesine Kar\u015f\u0131n Daval\u0131 Lehine Vek\u00e2let \u00dccretine H\u00fckmedilmemesinin Hatal\u0131 Oldu\u011fu ) KARAR \u0130LAM HARCI ( Konusu Belli Bir De\u011ferle \u0130lgili Bulunan Davalarda H\u00fck\u00fcm Verilmesi H\u00e2linde H\u00fck\u00fcm Alt\u0131na Al\u0131nan Anla\u015fmazl\u0131k Konusu De\u011fer \u00dczerinden Nispi Olarak Karar ve \u0130l\u00e2m Harc\u0131 Al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131\/Nispi Karar ve \u0130l\u00e2m Harc\u0131n\u0131n 1\/4’\u00fc Dava A\u00e7arken Davac\u0131 Taraf\u0131ndan Pe\u015fin Olarak \u00d6dendi\u011fi – Somut Dosyada Davac\u0131 Taraf\u0131ndan 25,20 TL Pe\u015fin Har\u00e7 ve 1.562,18 TL Islah Harc\u0131 Olmak \u00dczere Toplam 1.587,38 TL Har\u00e7 \u00d6dendi\u011fi G\u00f6zetilmeksizin Yaln\u0131zca 25,20 TL Pe\u015fin Har\u00e7 D\u00fc\u015f\u00fclmek Suretiyle Daval\u0131 Taraf\u0131n \u00d6deyece\u011fi Karar ve \u0130l\u00e2m Harc\u0131n\u0131n Yanl\u0131\u015f Hesapland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ) 4857\/m.41,44,46 \u00d6ZET: Mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan bozmaya uyulmas\u0131na karar verilmesine ve bozma sonras\u0131 al\u0131nan 05.05.2023 tarihli bilirki\u015fi raporunda da Dairemiz bozma il\u00e2mlar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda talep konusu yakacak yard\u0131m\u0131, ulusal bayram ve genel tatil \u00fccreti ile fazla …","og_url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/iscilik-alacaklari-vekalet-ucreti-karar-ilam-harci\/","og_site_name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","article_published_time":"2025-04-30T07:14:00+00:00","author":"Hukuki Haber.net","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u043e \u0430\u0432\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043e\u043c":"Hukuki Haber.net","\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"20 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/iscilik-alacaklari-vekalet-ucreti-karar-ilam-harci\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/iscilik-alacaklari-vekalet-ucreti-karar-ilam-harci\/"},"author":{"name":"Hukuki Haber.net","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822"},"headline":"\u0130\u015e\u00c7\u0130L\u0130K ALACAKLARI –\u00a0VEKALET \u00dcCRET\u0130 –\u00a0KARAR \u0130LAM HARCI","datePublished":"2025-04-30T07:14:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/iscilik-alacaklari-vekalet-ucreti-karar-ilam-harci\/"},"wordCount":3985,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Hukuki Haberler"],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/iscilik-alacaklari-vekalet-ucreti-karar-ilam-harci\/","url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/iscilik-alacaklari-vekalet-ucreti-karar-ilam-harci\/","name":"\u0130\u015e\u00c7\u0130L\u0130K ALACAKLARI -\u00a0VEKALET \u00dcCRET\u0130 -\u00a0KARAR \u0130LAM HARCI - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-04-30T07:14:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/iscilik-alacaklari-vekalet-ucreti-karar-ilam-harci\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/iscilik-alacaklari-vekalet-ucreti-karar-ilam-harci\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/iscilik-alacaklari-vekalet-ucreti-karar-ilam-harci\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u0130\u015e\u00c7\u0130L\u0130K ALACAKLARI –\u00a0VEKALET \u00dcCRET\u0130 –\u00a0KARAR \u0130LAM HARCI"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","description":"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","contentUrl":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","width":1080,"height":1080,"caption":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822","name":"Hukuki Haber.net","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Hukuki Haber.net"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net"],"url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/author\/hukukihabernet\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71255","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=71255"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71255\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=71255"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=71255"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=71255"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}