\u0130stanbul Barosunun 27.03.2025 tarihindeki a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131na g\u00f6re[1]; \u015ei\u015fli il\u00e7esinde yap\u0131lan toplant\u0131 ve y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f s\u0131ras\u0131nda \u00fc\u00e7 avukat g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu durum kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, g\u00f6zalt\u0131n\u0131n yasal dayana\u011f\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak bu yaz\u0131y\u0131 kaleme almaya karar verdik.<\/p>\n
Avukat\u0131n g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131n\u0131p al\u0131nmamas\u0131na ili\u015fkin a\u00e7\u0131k bir yasal d\u00fczenleme mevcut de\u011fildir. D\u00fczenlemelere bak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda; 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Yarg\u0131lama Yasas\u0131nda (m. 130), avukatlar\u0131n b\u00fcrolar\u0131nda ne \u015fekilde arama yap\u0131labilece\u011fi d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. Bu h\u00fckm\u00fcn uygulanmas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan g\u00f6rev su\u00e7u-ki\u015fisel su\u00e7 ayr\u0131m\u0131 yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
1136 say\u0131l\u0131 Avukatl\u0131k Yasas\u0131nda (m. 58), avukat\u0131n g\u00f6rev su\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n soru\u015fturulmas\u0131n\u0131n Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 iznine tabi oldu\u011fu, avukat\u0131n yaz\u0131hanesinin veya konutunun, ancak mahkeme karar\u0131yla baro temsilcisi ve Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 huzurunda aranabilece\u011fi, a\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemesinin g\u00f6rev alan\u0131na giren bir su\u00e7tan dolay\u0131 su\u00e7\u00fcst\u00fc hali d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda avukat\u0131n \u00fczerinin aranamayaca\u011f\u0131 d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Ayn\u0131 yasan\u0131n 61. maddesine g\u00f6re, a\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemesinin g\u00f6rev alan\u0131na giren bir su\u00e7tan dolay\u0131 su\u00e7\u00fcst\u00fc halinde soru\u015fturma, bizzat Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan genel h\u00fck\u00fcmlere g\u00f6re yap\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n
G\u00f6r\u00fclece\u011fi gibi, avukat\u0131n g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131 veya tutuklanmas\u0131yla ilgili a\u00e7\u0131k bir h\u00fck\u00fcm bulunmamakta olup \u00f6zellikle avukat\u0131n aranmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin d\u00fczenlemeler mevcuttur.<\/p>\n
Ceza Yarg\u0131lama Yasam\u0131z\u0131n 90 vd. maddelerinde koruma tedbirleri d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. Buna g\u00f6re; g\u00f6zalt\u0131, tutuklama ve arama, koruma tedbirleridir. G\u00f6zalt\u0131 ve tutuklama, ki\u015fi \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ihlal ederken arama, \u00f6zel hayat\u0131n gizlili\u011fini ihlal eder. Bu y\u00f6n\u00fcyle g\u00f6zalt\u0131, aramadan daha a\u011f\u0131r bir tedbirdir.<\/p>\n
Di\u011fer yandan g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nan bir ki\u015fi, Yarg\u0131lama Yasas\u0131n\u0131n 99. maddesine dayan\u0131larak \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131lan G\u00f6zalt\u0131 Y\u00f6netmeli\u011fi (m. 10) uyar\u0131nca aramaya tabi tutulmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Hukuk metodolojisi ba\u011flam\u0131nda normlar\u0131n yorumlanmas\u0131nda en \u00e7ok kullan\u0131lan ak\u0131l y\u00fcr\u00fctme y\u00f6ntemlerinden birisi evleviyet kural\u0131d\u0131r (argumentum a fortiori). Bu kurala g\u00f6re, bir \u015feyi yapmak yasaksa daha a\u011f\u0131r bir \u015feyi yapmak hayli hayli yasakt\u0131r. Tersi bir d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnceyle, bir \u015feyi yapmak serbestse daha hafif bir \u015feyi yapmak hayli hayli serbesttir.<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fka deyi\u015flerle anlatmak gerekirse; kim daha fazlas\u0131n\u0131 yapmaya yetkiliyse daha az\u0131n\u0131 da yapmaya yetkilidir. Kim daha az\u0131n\u0131 yapmaktan yasaklanm\u0131\u015fsa, daha fazlas\u0131n\u0131 yapmaktan da yasaklanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Di\u011fer yandan, hukuk normlar\u0131n\u0131n yorumunda kullan\u0131lan en temel ilke, genel h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin geni\u015f, istisnalar\u0131n dar yorumlanmas\u0131d\u0131r. Bunun bir sonucu olarak, \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fck lehine olan h\u00fck\u00fcmler geni\u015f, s\u0131n\u0131rlamalar dar yorumlan\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Bu yorum kurallar\u0131 \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde; a\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemesinin g\u00f6rev alan\u0131na giren bir su\u00e7tan dolay\u0131 su\u00e7\u00fcst\u00fc hali d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda avukat\u0131n \u00fczerinin aranamamas\u0131, avukata getirilen bir g\u00fcvence olup avukat\u0131n \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc korumaya y\u00f6neliktir. Yani bu ilke, avukat lehine geni\u015f yorumlanacakt\u0131r. Bunun bir sonucu olarak, e\u011fer bir durum kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda avukat\u0131n \u00fczerinin aran\u0131p aranamayaca\u011f\u0131 ku\u015fkuluysa, aranamayaca\u011f\u0131 kabul edilmelidir.<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere g\u00f6zalt\u0131 ve tutuklama; arama tedbirinden daha a\u011f\u0131r bir tedbirdir. Belirli bir durum kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda avukat\u0131n \u00fczeri aranam\u0131yorsa, g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131 hi\u00e7 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. Avukat\u0131n g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011filse, tutuklanmas\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclemez.<\/p>\n
Di\u011fer yandan g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nan ki\u015filerin \u00fczerinin aranaca\u011f\u0131 da g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde, bu h\u00fckm\u00fc aksi \u015fekilde uygulamak, h\u00fckm\u00fc dolanmak anlam\u0131na gelecektir. Buna g\u00f6re, avukat\u0131n aranamayaca\u011f\u0131 fakat g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nabilece\u011fini, g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131n\u0131nca da aranabilece\u011fini s\u00f6ylemek, mant\u0131kla ve d\u00fcr\u00fcstl\u00fckle ba\u011fda\u015fmaz.<\/p>\n
Bu a\u00e7\u0131klamalar kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda; avukat, a\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemesinin g\u00f6rev alan\u0131na giren bir su\u00e7tan dolay\u0131 su\u00e7\u00fcst\u00fc hali d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131namaz ve tutuklanamaz. <\/p>\n
Son bir husus, bu h\u00fckm\u00fcn g\u00f6rev su\u00e7u-ki\u015fisel su\u00e7 ayr\u0131m\u0131na tabi olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131d\u0131r. Yukar\u0131da bahsetti\u011fimiz Avukatl\u0131k Yasas\u0131n\u0131n 58. maddesinde, \u00fc\u00e7 c\u00fcmle pe\u015f pe\u015fe s\u0131ralanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u0130lk c\u00fcmlede g\u00f6rev su\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n soru\u015fturulmas\u0131nda Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n izninin gerekece\u011fi, ikinci c\u00fcmlede avukat yaz\u0131hanelerinde arama ve \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc c\u00fcmlede de a\u011f\u0131r cezal\u0131k su\u00e7lardan su\u00e7\u00fcst\u00fc d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda avukat\u0131n \u00fczerinin aranamayaca\u011f\u0131 d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. \u0130lk c\u00fcmlede g\u00f6rev su\u00e7undan bahsedilmi\u015fse de di\u011fer c\u00fcmlelerde ayr\u0131m yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Bu c\u00fcmle yap\u0131s\u0131ndan net bir sonuca ula\u015f\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan yorum yapmak gerekmektedir. \u0130kinci c\u00fcmlede avukat\u0131n ofisinde arama d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f olup bu h\u00fck\u00fcm yarg\u0131lama yasam\u0131z\u0131n 130. maddesine paraleldir. A\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere bu maddede g\u00f6rev su\u00e7u-ki\u015fisel su\u00e7 ayr\u0131m\u0131 da yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Daha \u00f6nce ifade etti\u011fimiz gibi, bunun gibi ku\u015fkulu durumlarda \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fck ve g\u00fcvence lehine yorum yap\u0131l\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla, avukat\u0131n bu g\u00fcvenceden hem g\u00f6rev hem de ki\u015fisel su\u00e7lar\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan faydalanmas\u0131 gerekir.<\/p>\n
Ayr\u0131ca kan\u0131m\u0131zca, gramatik yorum a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan, madde okundu\u011funda \u00fc\u00e7 c\u00fcmlenin birbirinden ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z oldu\u011fu, ilk c\u00fcmledeki g\u00f6rev su\u00e7u ifadesinin di\u011fer c\u00fcmleleri kapsar \u015fekilde kullan\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Di\u011fer yandan, yarg\u0131\u00e7lar ve savc\u0131lar a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan da benzer bir h\u00fck\u00fcm s\u00f6z konusu olup (2802 sy m. 88) burada da ayn\u0131 yorum yap\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. Zira bu \u00fc\u00e7 meslek sahibi de yarg\u0131 mensubudur.<\/p>\n
Sonu\u00e7 olarak; g\u00f6rev su\u00e7u-ki\u015fisel su\u00e7 fark etmeksizin avukat; ancak a\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemesinin g\u00f6rev alan\u0131na giren su\u00e7\u00fcst\u00fc halinde g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nabilir. Su\u00e7\u00fcst\u00fc hali olmayan veya a\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemesinin g\u00f6rev alan\u0131na girmeyen durumlarda avukat\u0131n g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131 veya tutuklanmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. Bu nedenle, \u0130stanbul Barosunun a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131\u011f\u0131 olayda, avukatlar\u0131n g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131 hatal\u0131 olmu\u015ftur. Zira isnat edilen su\u00e7 (2911 say\u0131l\u0131 yasaya muhalefet), a\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemesinin g\u00f6rev alan\u0131na girmemektedir.<\/p>\n
————-<\/p>\n
[1] https:\/\/x.com\/istbarosu\/status\/1905358232773624114?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet.<\/p>\n
\u200b\u0130stanbul Barosunun 27.03.2025 tarihindeki a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131na g\u00f6re[1]; \u015ei\u015fli il\u00e7esinde yap\u0131lan toplant\u0131 ve y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f s\u0131ras\u0131nda \u00fc\u00e7 avukat g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu durum kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, g\u00f6zalt\u0131n\u0131n yasal dayana\u011f\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak bu yaz\u0131y\u0131 kaleme almaya karar verdik.<\/p>\n
Avukat\u0131n g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131n\u0131p al\u0131nmamas\u0131na ili\u015fkin a\u00e7\u0131k bir yasal d\u00fczenleme mevcut de\u011fildir. D\u00fczenlemelere bak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda; 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Yarg\u0131lama Yasas\u0131nda (m. 130), avukatlar\u0131n b\u00fcrolar\u0131nda ne \u015fekilde arama yap\u0131labilece\u011fi d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. Bu h\u00fckm\u00fcn uygulanmas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan g\u00f6rev su\u00e7u-ki\u015fisel su\u00e7 ayr\u0131m\u0131 yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
1136 say\u0131l\u0131 Avukatl\u0131k Yasas\u0131nda (m. 58), avukat\u0131n g\u00f6rev su\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n soru\u015fturulmas\u0131n\u0131n Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 iznine tabi oldu\u011fu, avukat\u0131n yaz\u0131hanesinin veya konutunun, ancak mahkeme karar\u0131yla baro temsilcisi ve Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 huzurunda aranabilece\u011fi, a\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemesinin g\u00f6rev alan\u0131na giren bir su\u00e7tan dolay\u0131 su\u00e7\u00fcst\u00fc hali d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda avukat\u0131n \u00fczerinin aranamayaca\u011f\u0131 d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Ayn\u0131 yasan\u0131n 61. maddesine g\u00f6re, a\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemesinin g\u00f6rev alan\u0131na giren bir su\u00e7tan dolay\u0131 su\u00e7\u00fcst\u00fc halinde soru\u015fturma, bizzat Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan genel h\u00fck\u00fcmlere g\u00f6re yap\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n
G\u00f6r\u00fclece\u011fi gibi, avukat\u0131n g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131 veya tutuklanmas\u0131yla ilgili a\u00e7\u0131k bir h\u00fck\u00fcm bulunmamakta olup \u00f6zellikle avukat\u0131n aranmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin d\u00fczenlemeler mevcuttur.<\/p>\n
Ceza Yarg\u0131lama Yasam\u0131z\u0131n 90 vd. maddelerinde koruma tedbirleri d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. Buna g\u00f6re; g\u00f6zalt\u0131, tutuklama ve arama, koruma tedbirleridir. G\u00f6zalt\u0131 ve tutuklama, ki\u015fi \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ihlal ederken arama, \u00f6zel hayat\u0131n gizlili\u011fini ihlal eder. Bu y\u00f6n\u00fcyle g\u00f6zalt\u0131, aramadan daha a\u011f\u0131r bir tedbirdir.<\/p>\n
Di\u011fer yandan g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nan bir ki\u015fi, Yarg\u0131lama Yasas\u0131n\u0131n 99. maddesine dayan\u0131larak \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131lan G\u00f6zalt\u0131 Y\u00f6netmeli\u011fi (m. 10) uyar\u0131nca aramaya tabi tutulmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Hukuk metodolojisi ba\u011flam\u0131nda normlar\u0131n yorumlanmas\u0131nda en \u00e7ok kullan\u0131lan ak\u0131l y\u00fcr\u00fctme y\u00f6ntemlerinden birisi evleviyet kural\u0131d\u0131r (argumentum a fortiori). Bu kurala g\u00f6re, bir \u015feyi yapmak yasaksa daha a\u011f\u0131r bir \u015feyi yapmak hayli hayli yasakt\u0131r. Tersi bir d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnceyle, bir \u015feyi yapmak serbestse daha hafif bir \u015feyi yapmak hayli hayli serbesttir.<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fka deyi\u015flerle anlatmak gerekirse; kim daha fazlas\u0131n\u0131 yapmaya yetkiliyse daha az\u0131n\u0131 da yapmaya yetkilidir. Kim daha az\u0131n\u0131 yapmaktan yasaklanm\u0131\u015fsa, daha fazlas\u0131n\u0131 yapmaktan da yasaklanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Di\u011fer yandan, hukuk normlar\u0131n\u0131n yorumunda kullan\u0131lan en temel ilke, genel h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin geni\u015f, istisnalar\u0131n dar yorumlanmas\u0131d\u0131r. Bunun bir sonucu olarak, \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fck lehine olan h\u00fck\u00fcmler geni\u015f, s\u0131n\u0131rlamalar dar yorumlan\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Bu yorum kurallar\u0131 \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde; a\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemesinin g\u00f6rev alan\u0131na giren bir su\u00e7tan dolay\u0131 su\u00e7\u00fcst\u00fc hali d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda avukat\u0131n \u00fczerinin aranamamas\u0131, avukata getirilen bir g\u00fcvence olup avukat\u0131n \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc korumaya y\u00f6neliktir. Yani bu ilke, avukat lehine geni\u015f yorumlanacakt\u0131r. Bunun bir sonucu olarak, e\u011fer bir durum kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda avukat\u0131n \u00fczerinin aran\u0131p aranamayaca\u011f\u0131 ku\u015fkuluysa, aranamayaca\u011f\u0131 kabul edilmelidir.<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere g\u00f6zalt\u0131 ve tutuklama; arama tedbirinden daha a\u011f\u0131r bir tedbirdir. Belirli bir durum kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda avukat\u0131n \u00fczeri aranam\u0131yorsa, g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131 hi\u00e7 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. Avukat\u0131n g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011filse, tutuklanmas\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclemez.<\/p>\n
Di\u011fer yandan g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nan ki\u015filerin \u00fczerinin aranaca\u011f\u0131 da g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde, bu h\u00fckm\u00fc aksi \u015fekilde uygulamak, h\u00fckm\u00fc dolanmak anlam\u0131na gelecektir. Buna g\u00f6re, avukat\u0131n aranamayaca\u011f\u0131 fakat g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nabilece\u011fini, g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131n\u0131nca da aranabilece\u011fini s\u00f6ylemek, mant\u0131kla ve d\u00fcr\u00fcstl\u00fckle ba\u011fda\u015fmaz.<\/p>\n
Bu a\u00e7\u0131klamalar kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda; avukat, a\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemesinin g\u00f6rev alan\u0131na giren bir su\u00e7tan dolay\u0131 su\u00e7\u00fcst\u00fc hali d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131namaz ve tutuklanamaz. <\/p>\n
Son bir husus, bu h\u00fckm\u00fcn g\u00f6rev su\u00e7u-ki\u015fisel su\u00e7 ayr\u0131m\u0131na tabi olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131d\u0131r. Yukar\u0131da bahsetti\u011fimiz Avukatl\u0131k Yasas\u0131n\u0131n 58. maddesinde, \u00fc\u00e7 c\u00fcmle pe\u015f pe\u015fe s\u0131ralanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u0130lk c\u00fcmlede g\u00f6rev su\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n soru\u015fturulmas\u0131nda Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n izninin gerekece\u011fi, ikinci c\u00fcmlede avukat yaz\u0131hanelerinde arama ve \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc c\u00fcmlede de a\u011f\u0131r cezal\u0131k su\u00e7lardan su\u00e7\u00fcst\u00fc d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda avukat\u0131n \u00fczerinin aranamayaca\u011f\u0131 d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. \u0130lk c\u00fcmlede g\u00f6rev su\u00e7undan bahsedilmi\u015fse de di\u011fer c\u00fcmlelerde ayr\u0131m yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Bu c\u00fcmle yap\u0131s\u0131ndan net bir sonuca ula\u015f\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan yorum yapmak gerekmektedir. \u0130kinci c\u00fcmlede avukat\u0131n ofisinde arama d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f olup bu h\u00fck\u00fcm yarg\u0131lama yasam\u0131z\u0131n 130. maddesine paraleldir. A\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere bu maddede g\u00f6rev su\u00e7u-ki\u015fisel su\u00e7 ayr\u0131m\u0131 da yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Daha \u00f6nce ifade etti\u011fimiz gibi, bunun gibi ku\u015fkulu durumlarda \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fck ve g\u00fcvence lehine yorum yap\u0131l\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla, avukat\u0131n bu g\u00fcvenceden hem g\u00f6rev hem de ki\u015fisel su\u00e7lar\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan faydalanmas\u0131 gerekir.<\/p>\n
Ayr\u0131ca kan\u0131m\u0131zca, gramatik yorum a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan, madde okundu\u011funda \u00fc\u00e7 c\u00fcmlenin birbirinden ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z oldu\u011fu, ilk c\u00fcmledeki g\u00f6rev su\u00e7u ifadesinin di\u011fer c\u00fcmleleri kapsar \u015fekilde kullan\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Di\u011fer yandan, yarg\u0131\u00e7lar ve savc\u0131lar a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan da benzer bir h\u00fck\u00fcm s\u00f6z konusu olup (2802 sy m. 88) burada da ayn\u0131 yorum yap\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. Zira bu \u00fc\u00e7 meslek sahibi de yarg\u0131 mensubudur.<\/p>\n
Sonu\u00e7 olarak; g\u00f6rev su\u00e7u-ki\u015fisel su\u00e7 fark etmeksizin avukat; ancak a\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemesinin g\u00f6rev alan\u0131na giren su\u00e7\u00fcst\u00fc halinde g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nabilir. Su\u00e7\u00fcst\u00fc hali olmayan veya a\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemesinin g\u00f6rev alan\u0131na girmeyen durumlarda avukat\u0131n g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131 veya tutuklanmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. Bu nedenle, \u0130stanbul Barosunun a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131\u011f\u0131 olayda, avukatlar\u0131n g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131 hatal\u0131 olmu\u015ftur. Zira isnat edilen su\u00e7 (2911 say\u0131l\u0131 yasaya muhalefet), a\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemesinin g\u00f6rev alan\u0131na girmemektedir.<\/p>\n
————-<\/p>\n
[1] https:\/\/x.com\/istbarosu\/status\/1905358232773624114?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet.\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\u0130stanbul Barosunun 27.03.2025 tarihindeki a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131na g\u00f6re[1]; \u015ei\u015fli il\u00e7esinde yap\u0131lan toplant\u0131 ve y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f s\u0131ras\u0131nda \u00fc\u00e7 avukat g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu durum kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, g\u00f6zalt\u0131n\u0131n yasal dayana\u011f\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak bu yaz\u0131y\u0131 kaleme almaya karar verdik. Avukat\u0131n g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131n\u0131p al\u0131nmamas\u0131na ili\u015fkin a\u00e7\u0131k bir yasal d\u00fczenleme mevcut de\u011fildir. D\u00fczenlemelere bak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda; 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Yarg\u0131lama Yasas\u0131nda (m. 130), avukatlar\u0131n b\u00fcrolar\u0131nda ne \u015fekilde arama yap\u0131labilece\u011fi d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. Bu h\u00fckm\u00fcn uygulanmas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan g\u00f6rev su\u00e7u-ki\u015fisel su\u00e7 ayr\u0131m\u0131 yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 1136 say\u0131l\u0131 Avukatl\u0131k Yasas\u0131nda (m. 58), avukat\u0131n g\u00f6rev su\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n soru\u015fturulmas\u0131n\u0131n Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 iznine tabi oldu\u011fu, avukat\u0131n yaz\u0131hanesinin veya konutunun, ancak mahkeme karar\u0131yla baro temsilcisi ve Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 huzurunda aranabilece\u011fi, a\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemesinin g\u00f6rev alan\u0131na giren bir su\u00e7tan dolay\u0131 su\u00e7\u00fcst\u00fc hali d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda avukat\u0131n \u00fczerinin aranamayaca\u011f\u0131 d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. Ayn\u0131 yasan\u0131n 61. maddesine g\u00f6re, a\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemesinin g\u00f6rev alan\u0131na giren bir su\u00e7tan dolay\u0131 su\u00e7\u00fcst\u00fc halinde soru\u015fturma, bizzat Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan genel h\u00fck\u00fcmlere g\u00f6re yap\u0131l\u0131r. G\u00f6r\u00fclece\u011fi gibi, avukat\u0131n g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131 veya tutuklanmas\u0131yla ilgili a\u00e7\u0131k bir h\u00fck\u00fcm bulunmamakta olup \u00f6zellikle avukat\u0131n aranmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin d\u00fczenlemeler mevcuttur. Ceza Yarg\u0131lama Yasam\u0131z\u0131n 90 vd. maddelerinde koruma tedbirleri d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. Buna g\u00f6re; g\u00f6zalt\u0131, tutuklama ve arama, koruma tedbirleridir. G\u00f6zalt\u0131 ve tutuklama, ki\u015fi \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ihlal ederken arama, \u00f6zel hayat\u0131n gizlili\u011fini ihlal eder. Bu y\u00f6n\u00fcyle g\u00f6zalt\u0131, aramadan daha a\u011f\u0131r bir tedbirdir. Di\u011fer yandan g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nan …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-43339","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n