{"id":36978,"date":"2025-03-25T15:49:00","date_gmt":"2025-03-25T12:49:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uncategorized-tr\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2014-7894-e-2014-8474-k-sayili-karari\/"},"modified":"2025-03-25T15:49:00","modified_gmt":"2025-03-25T12:49:00","slug":"yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2014-7894-e-2014-8474-k-sayili-karari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2014-7894-e-2014-8474-k-sayili-karari\/","title":{"rendered":"Yarg\u0131tay 8. Hukuk Dairesi’nin 2014\/7894 E. 2014\/8474 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"

T.C.<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay<\/p>\n

8. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n

2014\/7894 E., 2014\/8474 K.<\/p>\n

“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n

MAHKEMES\u0130 : Ankara 14. \u0130cra Hukuk Mahkemesi
\nTAR\u0130H\u0130 : 28\/02\/2014
\nNUMARASI : 2014\/208-2014\/204<\/p>\n

Yukar\u0131da tarih ve numaras\u0131 yaz\u0131l\u0131 Mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcddeti i\u00e7inde temyizen tetkiki daval\u0131lar taraf\u0131ndan istenmesi \u00fczerine bu i\u015fle ilgili dosya mahallinden Daire’ye g\u00f6nderilmi\u015f olup, dava dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7in Tetkik Hakimi taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen rapor dinlendikten ve dosya i\u00e7erisindeki t\u00fcm belgeler okunup incelendikten sonra i\u015fin gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n

K A R A R<\/p>\n

Alacakl\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan bor\u00e7lu aleyhine Ankara 9.Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesi’nin 2012\/690 Esas-2013\/555 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131na dayan\u0131larak ilaml\u0131 icra takibine ba\u015fland\u0131\u011f\u0131; bor\u00e7lunun \u0130cra Mahkemesi’ne ba\u015fvurarak, takip konusu borcun icra emri tebli\u011finden \u00f6nce dosya numaras\u0131 da belirtilerek alacakl\u0131 vekilinin banka hesab\u0131na \u00f6dendi\u011finden icra takibinin iptalini istedi\u011fi, alacakl\u0131 vekilinin taraf\u0131na bildirim yap\u0131lmadan \u015fahs\u0131na ait banka hesap numaras\u0131na yap\u0131lan \u00f6demeden 17.02.2014 tarihinde haberdar oldu\u011fu, icra takibinden sonraki \u00f6deme olmas\u0131 nedeniyle dosya borcunun tamam\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6denmesi gerekti\u011fini belirterek davan\u0131n reddini talep etti\u011fi, mahkemece bor\u00e7lu taraf\u0131ndan yat\u0131r\u0131lan 5865 TL y\u00f6n\u00fcnden \u00f6deme sebebi ile icran\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verildi\u011fi, anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Ba\u015fvuru bu hali ile \u0130\u0130K’nun 33\/1. maddesine dayal\u0131, icra emri tebli\u011finden \u00f6nceki d\u00f6neme ili\u015fkin itfa itiraz\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n

6098 say\u0131l\u0131 T.B.K’nun 100. (Eski 818 say\u0131l\u0131 BK 84. ) maddesinde, ”Bor\u00e7lu faiz veya masraflar\u0131 tediyede gecikmi\u015f de\u011fil ise, k\u0131smen yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00f6demeyi ana bor\u00e7tan d\u00fc\u015fme hakk\u0131na sahiptir. ” h\u00fckm\u00fc yer almaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Somut olayda, dayanak ilamdaki alacak, yarg\u0131lama gideri, ilam vekalet \u00fccreti ve faizlerinin tahsili amac\u0131yla toplam 5.888.51 TL \u00fczerinden icra takibinin 13.02.2014 tarihinde ba\u015flat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, icra emrinin bor\u00e7lu vekiline 17.02.2014 tarihinde tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi, 13.02.2014 tarihinde 5865 TL \u00f6demenin alacakl\u0131 vekilinin ad\u0131, ilam\u0131n esas ve karar numaras\u0131 belirtilerek alacakl\u0131 vekiline havale edildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Dosya kapsam\u0131nda bu \u00f6demeden takipten \u00f6nce alacakl\u0131 vekilinin haberdar edildi\u011fi ispatlanamad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, an\u0131lan \u00f6demeninin k\u0131smi \u00f6deme oldu\u011funun kabul\u00fc gerekir.<\/p>\n

Mahkemece, TBK’nun 100. maddesi (BK’nun 84. maddesi) ve \u0130\u0130K’nun 33. maddesi g\u00f6zetilerek Yarg\u0131tay denetimine imkan verecek \u015fekilde, bilirki\u015fi incelemesi yapt\u0131r\u0131lmak suretiyle i\u015flemi\u015f faiz, icra vekalet \u00fccreti ve takip masraflar\u0131 dikkate al\u0131narak bor\u00e7 miktar\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesi ve olu\u015facak sonuca g\u00f6re bir karar verilmesi gerekirken, eksik inceleme ile yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm tesisi isabetsizdir.<\/p>\n

SONU\u00c7: Alacakl\u0131lar vekilinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile Mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n yukar\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 nedenlerle \u0130\u0130K’nun 366. ve 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK’nun Ge\u00e7ici 3. maddesi yollamas\u0131yla 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 HUMK’nun 428. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca BOZULMASINA, taraflarca HUMK’nun 388\/4. (HMK m. 297\/\u00e7) ve \u0130\u0130K’nun 366\/3. maddeleri gere\u011fince Yarg\u0131tay Daire ilam\u0131n\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren ilama kar\u015f\u0131 10 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde karar d\u00fczeltme iste\u011finde bulunulabilece\u011fine, 28.04.2014 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u200bYarg\u0131tay 8. Hukuk Dairesi’nin 28.04.2014 tarihli 2014\/7894 esas, 2014\/8474 karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n

Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 8. Hukuk Dairesi 2014\/7894 E., 2014\/8474 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” MAHKEMES\u0130 : Ankara 14. \u0130cra Hukuk Mahkemesi TAR\u0130H\u0130 : 28\/02\/2014 NUMARASI : 2014\/208-2014\/204 Yukar\u0131da tarih ve numaras\u0131 yaz\u0131l\u0131 Mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcddeti i\u00e7inde temyizen tetkiki daval\u0131lar taraf\u0131ndan istenmesi \u00fczerine bu i\u015fle ilgili dosya mahallinden Daire’ye g\u00f6nderilmi\u015f olup, dava dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7in Tetkik Hakimi taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen rapor dinlendikten ve dosya i\u00e7erisindeki t\u00fcm belgeler okunup incelendikten sonra i\u015fin gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: K A R A R Alacakl\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan bor\u00e7lu aleyhine Ankara 9.Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesi’nin 2012\/690 Esas-2013\/555 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131na dayan\u0131larak ilaml\u0131 icra takibine ba\u015fland\u0131\u011f\u0131; bor\u00e7lunun \u0130cra Mahkemesi’ne ba\u015fvurarak, takip konusu borcun icra emri tebli\u011finden \u00f6nce dosya numaras\u0131 da belirtilerek alacakl\u0131 vekilinin banka hesab\u0131na \u00f6dendi\u011finden icra takibinin iptalini istedi\u011fi, alacakl\u0131 vekilinin taraf\u0131na bildirim yap\u0131lmadan \u015fahs\u0131na ait banka hesap numaras\u0131na yap\u0131lan \u00f6demeden 17.02.2014 tarihinde haberdar oldu\u011fu, icra takibinden sonraki \u00f6deme olmas\u0131 nedeniyle dosya borcunun tamam\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6denmesi gerekti\u011fini belirterek davan\u0131n reddini talep etti\u011fi, mahkemece bor\u00e7lu taraf\u0131ndan yat\u0131r\u0131lan 5865 TL y\u00f6n\u00fcnden \u00f6deme sebebi ile icran\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verildi\u011fi, anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvuru bu hali ile \u0130\u0130K’nun 33\/1. maddesine dayal\u0131, icra emri tebli\u011finden \u00f6nceki d\u00f6neme ili\u015fkin itfa itiraz\u0131d\u0131r. 6098 say\u0131l\u0131 T.B.K’nun 100. (Eski 818 say\u0131l\u0131 BK 84. ) maddesinde, ”Bor\u00e7lu faiz veya masraflar\u0131 tediyede gecikmi\u015f de\u011fil ise, k\u0131smen yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-36978","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nYarg\u0131tay 8. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2014\/7894 E. 2014\/8474 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2014-7894-e-2014-8474-k-sayili-karari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Yarg\u0131tay 8. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2014\/7894 E. 2014\/8474 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 8. Hukuk Dairesi 2014\/7894 E., 2014\/8474 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” MAHKEMES\u0130 : Ankara 14. \u0130cra Hukuk Mahkemesi TAR\u0130H\u0130 : 28\/02\/2014 NUMARASI : 2014\/208-2014\/204 Yukar\u0131da tarih ve numaras\u0131 yaz\u0131l\u0131 Mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcddeti i\u00e7inde temyizen tetkiki daval\u0131lar taraf\u0131ndan istenmesi \u00fczerine bu i\u015fle ilgili dosya mahallinden Daire’ye g\u00f6nderilmi\u015f olup, dava dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7in Tetkik Hakimi taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen rapor dinlendikten ve dosya i\u00e7erisindeki t\u00fcm belgeler okunup incelendikten sonra i\u015fin gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: K A R A R Alacakl\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan bor\u00e7lu aleyhine Ankara 9.Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesi’nin 2012\/690 Esas-2013\/555 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131na dayan\u0131larak ilaml\u0131 icra takibine ba\u015fland\u0131\u011f\u0131; bor\u00e7lunun \u0130cra Mahkemesi’ne ba\u015fvurarak, takip konusu borcun icra emri tebli\u011finden \u00f6nce dosya numaras\u0131 da belirtilerek alacakl\u0131 vekilinin banka hesab\u0131na \u00f6dendi\u011finden icra takibinin iptalini istedi\u011fi, alacakl\u0131 vekilinin taraf\u0131na bildirim yap\u0131lmadan \u015fahs\u0131na ait banka hesap numaras\u0131na yap\u0131lan \u00f6demeden 17.02.2014 tarihinde haberdar oldu\u011fu, icra takibinden sonraki \u00f6deme olmas\u0131 nedeniyle dosya borcunun tamam\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6denmesi gerekti\u011fini belirterek davan\u0131n reddini talep etti\u011fi, mahkemece bor\u00e7lu taraf\u0131ndan yat\u0131r\u0131lan 5865 TL y\u00f6n\u00fcnden \u00f6deme sebebi ile icran\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verildi\u011fi, anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvuru bu hali ile \u0130\u0130K’nun 33\/1. maddesine dayal\u0131, icra emri tebli\u011finden \u00f6nceki d\u00f6neme ili\u015fkin itfa itiraz\u0131d\u0131r. 6098 say\u0131l\u0131 T.B.K’nun 100. (Eski 818 say\u0131l\u0131 BK 84. ) maddesinde, ”Bor\u00e7lu faiz veya masraflar\u0131 tediyede gecikmi\u015f de\u011fil ise, k\u0131smen yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 …\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2014-7894-e-2014-8474-k-sayili-karari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-03-25T12:49:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u043e \u0430\u0432\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043e\u043c\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u044b\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2014-7894-e-2014-8474-k-sayili-karari\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2014-7894-e-2014-8474-k-sayili-karari\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\"},\"headline\":\"Yarg\u0131tay 8. Hukuk Dairesi’nin 2014\/7894 E. 2014\/8474 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-03-25T12:49:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2014-7894-e-2014-8474-k-sayili-karari\/\"},\"wordCount\":528,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Hukuki Haberler\"],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2014-7894-e-2014-8474-k-sayili-karari\/\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2014-7894-e-2014-8474-k-sayili-karari\/\",\"name\":\"Yarg\u0131tay 8. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2014\/7894 E. 2014\/8474 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2025-03-25T12:49:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2014-7894-e-2014-8474-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2014-7894-e-2014-8474-k-sayili-karari\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2014-7894-e-2014-8474-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Yarg\u0131tay 8. Hukuk Dairesi’nin 2014\/7894 E. 2014\/8474 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"description\":\"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"width\":1080,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\",\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net\"],\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/author\/hukukihabernet\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Yarg\u0131tay 8. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2014\/7894 E. 2014\/8474 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2014-7894-e-2014-8474-k-sayili-karari\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Yarg\u0131tay 8. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2014\/7894 E. 2014\/8474 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131","og_description":"T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 8. Hukuk Dairesi 2014\/7894 E., 2014\/8474 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” MAHKEMES\u0130 : Ankara 14. \u0130cra Hukuk Mahkemesi TAR\u0130H\u0130 : 28\/02\/2014 NUMARASI : 2014\/208-2014\/204 Yukar\u0131da tarih ve numaras\u0131 yaz\u0131l\u0131 Mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcddeti i\u00e7inde temyizen tetkiki daval\u0131lar taraf\u0131ndan istenmesi \u00fczerine bu i\u015fle ilgili dosya mahallinden Daire’ye g\u00f6nderilmi\u015f olup, dava dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7in Tetkik Hakimi taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen rapor dinlendikten ve dosya i\u00e7erisindeki t\u00fcm belgeler okunup incelendikten sonra i\u015fin gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: K A R A R Alacakl\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan bor\u00e7lu aleyhine Ankara 9.Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesi’nin 2012\/690 Esas-2013\/555 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131na dayan\u0131larak ilaml\u0131 icra takibine ba\u015fland\u0131\u011f\u0131; bor\u00e7lunun \u0130cra Mahkemesi’ne ba\u015fvurarak, takip konusu borcun icra emri tebli\u011finden \u00f6nce dosya numaras\u0131 da belirtilerek alacakl\u0131 vekilinin banka hesab\u0131na \u00f6dendi\u011finden icra takibinin iptalini istedi\u011fi, alacakl\u0131 vekilinin taraf\u0131na bildirim yap\u0131lmadan \u015fahs\u0131na ait banka hesap numaras\u0131na yap\u0131lan \u00f6demeden 17.02.2014 tarihinde haberdar oldu\u011fu, icra takibinden sonraki \u00f6deme olmas\u0131 nedeniyle dosya borcunun tamam\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6denmesi gerekti\u011fini belirterek davan\u0131n reddini talep etti\u011fi, mahkemece bor\u00e7lu taraf\u0131ndan yat\u0131r\u0131lan 5865 TL y\u00f6n\u00fcnden \u00f6deme sebebi ile icran\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verildi\u011fi, anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvuru bu hali ile \u0130\u0130K’nun 33\/1. maddesine dayal\u0131, icra emri tebli\u011finden \u00f6nceki d\u00f6neme ili\u015fkin itfa itiraz\u0131d\u0131r. 6098 say\u0131l\u0131 T.B.K’nun 100. (Eski 818 say\u0131l\u0131 BK 84. ) maddesinde, ”Bor\u00e7lu faiz veya masraflar\u0131 tediyede gecikmi\u015f de\u011fil ise, k\u0131smen yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 …","og_url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2014-7894-e-2014-8474-k-sayili-karari\/","og_site_name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","article_published_time":"2025-03-25T12:49:00+00:00","author":"Hukuki Haber.net","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u043e \u0430\u0432\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043e\u043c":"Hukuki Haber.net","\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"3 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u044b"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2014-7894-e-2014-8474-k-sayili-karari\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2014-7894-e-2014-8474-k-sayili-karari\/"},"author":{"name":"Hukuki Haber.net","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822"},"headline":"Yarg\u0131tay 8. Hukuk Dairesi’nin 2014\/7894 E. 2014\/8474 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131","datePublished":"2025-03-25T12:49:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2014-7894-e-2014-8474-k-sayili-karari\/"},"wordCount":528,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Hukuki Haberler"],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2014-7894-e-2014-8474-k-sayili-karari\/","url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2014-7894-e-2014-8474-k-sayili-karari\/","name":"Yarg\u0131tay 8. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2014\/7894 E. 2014\/8474 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-03-25T12:49:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2014-7894-e-2014-8474-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2014-7894-e-2014-8474-k-sayili-karari\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2014-7894-e-2014-8474-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Yarg\u0131tay 8. Hukuk Dairesi’nin 2014\/7894 E. 2014\/8474 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","description":"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","contentUrl":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","width":1080,"height":1080,"caption":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822","name":"Hukuki Haber.net","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Hukuki Haber.net"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net"],"url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/author\/hukukihabernet\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36978","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=36978"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36978\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=36978"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=36978"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=36978"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}