T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
YA\u015eAR AL BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/36095)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 22\/1\/2025<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Ay\u015fenur TUNCER<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Ya\u015far AL<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, tutukluya kay\u0131nbabas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc \u00fczerine taziyede bulunmak i\u00e7in telefonla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme hakk\u0131 verilmemesi nedeniyle \u00f6zel hayata ve aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvuru tarihinde, Sincan T Tipi Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumunda (\u0130nfaz Kurumu) tutuklu olarak bulunan ba\u015fvurucunun kay\u0131nbabas\u0131 14\/9\/2020 tarihinde vefat etmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu 21\/9\/2020 tarihli dilek\u00e7esiyle Ankara Bat\u0131 1. \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine (\u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi) \u015fik\u00e2yette bulunmu\u015ftur. Dilek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zetle; \u0130nfaz Kurumu g\u00f6revlilerine s\u00f6zl\u00fc olarak kay\u0131nbabas\u0131n\u0131n cenazesine kat\u0131lmak istedi\u011fini, bu m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde telefonla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme yapma hakk\u0131n\u0131 kullanmak istedi\u011fini s\u00f6ylemesine ra\u011fmen taraf\u0131na bilgi verilmedi\u011fini ifade etmi\u015ftir. Bu nedenle 16\/9\/2020 tarihli dilek\u00e7esiyle \u0130nfaz Kurumuna talebini yaz\u0131l\u0131 olarak iletti\u011fini ancak talebi hakk\u0131nda herhangi bir karar verilmedi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrerek kay\u0131nbabas\u0131n\u0131n vefat\u0131 nedeniyle telefonla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme hakk\u0131n\u0131n kulland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
3. \u0130nfaz Kurumunun, \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine sundu\u011fu 21\/9\/2020 tarihli g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f yaz\u0131s\u0131nda; 29\/3\/2020 tarihli ve 31083 say\u0131l\u0131 Resm\u00ee Gazete’de yay\u0131mlanan Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumlar\u0131n\u0131n Y\u00f6netimi ile Ceza ve G\u00fcvenlik Tedbirlerinin \u0130nfaz\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Y\u00f6netmelik’in (Y\u00f6netmelik) 74. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (c) bendinde yer alan d\u00fczenlemeye g\u00f6re; mevzuatta kay\u0131n h\u0131s\u0131mlar\u0131n\u0131n vefat\u0131nda telefonla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme hakk\u0131n\u0131n oldu\u011funa dair bir d\u00fczenleme yer almad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan talebin uygun g\u00f6r\u00fclmedi\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi 25\/9\/2020 tarihli karar\u0131yla \u015fik\u00e2yetin reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. Karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde; Y\u00f6netmeli\u011fin “Telefonla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme hakk\u0131” kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 74. maddesi \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde inceleme yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015ftir. Buna g\u00f6re Y\u00f6netmelikte h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc\/tutuklunun telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesi yapabilece\u011fi ki\u015filerin ifade edildi\u011fi ancak h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc\/tutuklunun \u015fik\u00e2yet dilek\u00e7esinde telefon arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla kiminle g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmek istedi\u011fini belirtmedi\u011fi, bu h\u00e2liyle herhangi bir karar verilemeyece\u011fini de\u011ferlendirmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca Y\u00f6netmeli\u011fin 74. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (c) bendinde \u00f6l\u00fcm h\u00e2linde h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc\/tutuklunun g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015febilece\u011fi ki\u015filerin say\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu maddede say\u0131lanlar d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmek istedi\u011fi ki\u015filer ile mektup, faks gibi yollarla ileti\u015fim kurmas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcmk\u00fcn oldu\u011funu vurgulam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucu an\u0131lan karara kar\u015f\u0131 1\/10\/2020 tarihli dilek\u00e7esiyle itiraz etmi\u015ftir. \u0130tiraz dilek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zetle; \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi karar\u0131nda her ne kadar telefonda kiminle g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmek istedi\u011finin belirtilmedi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle talebinin reddine karar verilmi\u015f ise de kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 ceza infaz kurumunda arayabilece\u011fi bir tek telefon numaras\u0131n\u0131n kay\u0131tl\u0131 oldu\u011funu, bu numaran\u0131n da e\u015fine ait oldu\u011funu ifade ederek telefon hakk\u0131n\u0131 kullanma talebinin de\u011ferlendirilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir. Ankara Bat\u0131 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi (A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi) karar\u0131n usul ve kanuna uygun oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle 9\/10\/2020 tarihinde itiraz\u0131n reddine kesin olarak karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. Ba\u015fvurucu, nihai karar\u0131 14\/10\/2020 tarihinde tebell\u00fc\u011f ettikten sonra 26\/10\/2020 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
7. \u00d6deme g\u00fcc\u00fcnden yoksun oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurucunun adli yard\u0131m talebinin kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
8. Ba\u015fvurucu; kay\u0131nbabas\u0131n\u0131n vefat\u0131 dolay\u0131s\u0131yla e\u015fiyle telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesi yapmak istedi\u011fini, kimi aramak istedi\u011fini dilek\u00e7esinde belirtmemi\u015f olmas\u0131n\u0131n talebinin de\u011ferlendirilmeye al\u0131nmamas\u0131n\u0131 hakl\u0131 k\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu bilginin kolayl\u0131kla elde edilebilece\u011fini ifade etmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca ba\u015fvurucu Kurumda kay\u0131tl\u0131 olan tek numaran\u0131n e\u015fine ait oldu\u011funu ve kay\u0131nbabas\u0131n\u0131n vefat\u0131 nedeniyle e\u015fini aramas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6nem arz etti\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
9. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde; ba\u015fvurucunun \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine sundu\u011fu \u015fik\u00e2yet dilek\u00e7esinde telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesini kimle ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirmek istedi\u011fine ili\u015fkin bir a\u00e7\u0131klamada bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilerek ba\u015fvurucunun talep dilek\u00e7esindeki belirsizlik giderilmeksizin mevcut durumda bir de\u011ferlendirmede bulunman\u0131n m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kararda ifade edildi\u011fine i\u015faret edilmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca ihlal iddialar\u0131 incelenirken Anayasa ve ilgili mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmleri ile Anayasa Mahkemesi i\u00e7tihad\u0131 ve somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyan\u0131nda bireysel ba\u015fvuru formundaki iddialar\u0131n\u0131 yinelemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
10. Ba\u015fvuru, \u00f6zel hayata ve aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
11. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
12. Ba\u015fvurucunun \u00f6zel hayata ve aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131na y\u00f6nelik m\u00fcdahalenin 13\/12\/2004 tarihli ve 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza ve G\u00fcvenlik Tedbirlerinin \u0130nfaz\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun\u2019un 66. maddesi, Y\u00f6netmeli\u011fin 74. maddesinin (1) ve (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kralar\u0131 ve 6\/4\/2006 tarihli ve 26131 say\u0131l\u0131 Resm\u00ee Gazete’de yay\u0131mlanan Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumlar\u0131n\u0131n Y\u00f6netimi ile Ceza ve G\u00fcvenlik Tedbirlerinin \u0130nfaz\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda T\u00fcz\u00fck’\u00fcn 88. maddesine istinaden ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011fi, bu d\u00fczenlemelerin kanunla s\u0131n\u0131rlama \u015fart\u0131n\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (benzer y\u00f6ndeki de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7in bkz. Sinan G\u00fcl, B. No: 2016\/7628, 27\/2\/2020, \u00a7\u00a7 40-42; Cengiz Eker, B. No: 2017\/26841, 2\/6\/2020, \u00a7\u00a7 41-43; Rasul Kocat\u00fcrk [GK], B. No: 2016\/8080, 16\/12\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 45-46). Di\u011fer yandan ba\u015fvuru konusu olayda \u00f6zel hayata ve aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131na y\u00f6nelik m\u00fcdahalenin kamu d\u00fczeninin ve g\u00fcvenli\u011finin sa\u011flanmas\u0131 ile su\u00e7 i\u015flenmesinin \u00f6nlenmesi kapsam\u0131nda telefonla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme hakk\u0131n\u0131n s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 \u015feklinde uyguland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve me\u015fru ama\u00e7 ta\u015f\u0131ma \u015fart\u0131n\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lad\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir (benzer y\u00f6ndeki de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7in bkz. Sinan G\u00fcl, \u00a7\u00a7 43, 44; Cengiz Eker, \u00a7\u00a7 44, 45; Rasul Kocat\u00fcrk, 47-50). Bu belirlemenin ard\u0131ndan m\u00fcdahalenin demokratik toplum d\u00fczeninin gereklerine uygun olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden inceleme yap\u0131lacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n
13. Temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklere y\u00f6nelik bir m\u00fcdahalenin demokratik toplum d\u00fczeninin gereklerine uygun kabul edilebilmesi i\u00e7in zorunlu bir toplumsal ihtiyac\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lamas\u0131 ve orant\u0131l\u0131 olmas\u0131 gerekir (Ferhat \u00dcst\u00fcnda\u011f, B. No: 2014\/15428, 17\/7\/2018, \u00a7 45; Abuzer Uzun, B. No: 2016\/61250, 13\/6\/2019, \u00a7 38). Ayr\u0131ca ba\u015fvuru konusu olay bak\u0131m\u0131ndan m\u00fcdahalenin demokratik toplum d\u00fczeninin gereklerine uygun olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 incelenirken yarg\u0131lama makamlar\u0131n\u0131n kararlar\u0131nda ortaya konulan gerek\u00e7eler de\u011ferlendirilmeli ve m\u00fcdahaleyi do\u011furan gerek\u00e7elerin inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 bir \u015fekilde ortaya konulup konulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ve m\u00fcdahalenin \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fcl\u00fck ilkesine uygun olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na bak\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r (Be\u015fir Do\u011fan, B. No: 2013\/2335, 15\/12\/2015, \u00a7 44; Emre S\u00f6nmez, B. No: 2019\/890, 13\/1\/2022, \u00a7\u00a7 44, 45).<\/p>\n
14. Anayasa Mahkemesine g\u00f6re Anayasa’n\u0131n 19. maddesi gere\u011fince h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc ve tutuklular\u0131n \u00f6zel hayat\u0131n ve aile hayat\u0131n\u0131n s\u0131n\u0131rlanmas\u0131 hukuka uygun olarak cezaevinde tutulman\u0131n ka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131lmaz ve do\u011fal bir sonucudur. \u00d6te yandan h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc ve tutuklular\u0131n \u00f6zel hayata ve aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 g\u00f6sterilmesi hakk\u0131, cezaevi idaresinin h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc ve tutuklular\u0131n ailesi ve yak\u0131nlar\u0131yla temas\u0131n\u0131 devam ettirecek \u00f6nlemleri almas\u0131n\u0131 zorunlu k\u0131lmaktad\u0131r (Mehmet Zahit \u015eahin, B. No: 2013\/4708, 20\/4\/2016, \u00a7 36). Burada m\u00fchim olan ceza infaz kurumunun g\u00fcvenli\u011finin sa\u011flanmas\u0131 amac\u0131 ile h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcn\u00fcn \u00f6zel hayata ve aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 g\u00f6sterilmesi hakk\u0131 aras\u0131nda adil bir dengenin sa\u011flanm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131d\u0131r. Ancak bu dengede \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fck ve g\u00fcvenlik ili\u015fkisinde cezaevinde bulunman\u0131n sonu\u00e7lar\u0131 olarak idarenin tutuklu ve h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fclerin \u00f6zel hayata ve aile hayat\u0131na m\u00fcdahale konusunda takdir yetkisinin daha geni\u015f oldu\u011fu g\u00f6zetilmelidir. (Mehmet Koray Erya\u015fa, B. No: 2013\/6693, 16\/4\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 88, 89; Ahmet \u00c7ilgin, \u00a7 32; Rasul Kocat\u00fcrk, \u00a7 56).<\/p>\n
15. Bunun yan\u0131nda somut olay\u0131n ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131 inceledi\u011fimizde \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn insan hayat\u0131nda kar\u015f\u0131la\u015f\u0131lan ac\u0131 olaylardan biri oldu\u011funu belirtmek gerekmektedir. Bir\u00e7ok k\u00fclt\u00fcrde \u00f6len kimsenin tan\u0131d\u0131klar\u0131 bir araya gelerek \u00f6l\u00fcm nedeniyle duyulan ac\u0131 ve \u00fcz\u00fcnt\u00fcy\u00fc payla\u015f\u0131r. \u00d6lenin geride kalan aile bireyleri ziyaret edilerek kendilerine maddi ve manevi destekte bulunulur. \u015e\u00fcphesiz bu ac\u0131y\u0131 \u00f6l\u00fcm an\u0131ndan itibaren en yo\u011fun derecede ya\u015fayan ve deste\u011fe en \u00e7ok ihtiya\u00e7 duyanlar aile bireyleridir (benzer y\u00f6ndeki de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7in Muhittin Pirin\u00e7\u00e7io\u011flu, B. No: 2020\/28439, 21\/11\/2023, \u00a7 13; Rasul Kocat\u00fcrk, \u00a7 61; Murat Yavuzarslan, B. No: 2020\/29558, 8\/2\/2024, \u00a7 15). Ayr\u0131ca Rasul Kocat\u00fcrk karar\u0131nda belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere yak\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6len h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcn\u00fcn izin talebinin, kamu makamlar\u0131nca s\u00fcratle harekete ge\u00e7ilerek ko\u015fullar da dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olan en k\u0131sa s\u00fcrede sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 \u00f6nem arz etmektedir. Ayr\u0131ca talebin kar\u015f\u0131lanmas\u0131nda kamu makamlar\u0131n\u0131n kendilerinden beklenen \u00f6zeni g\u00f6stermeleri gerekmektedir. \u015eayet talebin kar\u015f\u0131lanmas\u0131 imk\u00e2n d\u00e2hilinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmezse bu duruma ili\u015fkin zorunluluk h\u00e2llerinin ve g\u00fcvenlik risklerinin, somut olgu ve olaylara dayal\u0131 olarak a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131 gerekir (Rasul Kocat\u00fcrk, \u00a7\u00a7 61, 62).<\/p>\n
16. Somut olayda, ba\u015fvurucunun taziye i\u00e7in telefonla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme talebi Y\u00f6netmeli\u011fin 74. maddesi kapsam\u0131nda yap\u0131lan bir inceleme sonucu reddedilmi\u015ftir. An\u0131lan h\u00fckm\u00fcn (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda telefonla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme hakk\u0131na ili\u015fkin genel bir d\u00fczenlemeye yer verildi\u011fi, buna g\u00f6re h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcn\u00fcn e\u015fi, d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc dereceye kadar kan ve kay\u0131n h\u0131s\u0131mlar\u0131 ve vasisiyle telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesi yapabilece\u011fi hususunun d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. H\u00fckm\u00fcn (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (c) bendinde ise h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcn\u00fcn altsoy, \u00fcstsoy, e\u015f ve karde\u015flerinin \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc h\u00e2linde kuruma ait telefon ve faks cihaz\u0131ndan derh\u00e2l yararland\u0131r\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir. Bu kapsamda \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi karar\u0131nda (bkz. \u00a7 4) belirtilenin aksine; Y\u00f6netmeli\u011fin 74. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (c) bendinde say\u0131lanlar, telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesi yap\u0131labilecek ki\u015filer de\u011fil \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc h\u00e2linde h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan telefonla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme hakk\u0131 do\u011furabilecek ki\u015filerdir. Bu durumda ba\u015fvurucunun talebi hususunda ilgili h\u00fck\u00fcmler kapsam\u0131nda somut olaya uygun bir gerek\u00e7e ortaya kondu\u011fundan s\u00f6z edilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn g\u00f6r\u00fcnmemektedir.<\/p>\n
17. Ayr\u0131ca ilgili mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmleri \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcn\u00fcn altsoy, \u00fcstsoy, e\u015f ve karde\u015flerinin \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc h\u00e2linde derhal telefonla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme hakk\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131n\u0131rken kay\u0131n h\u0131s\u0131mlar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc h\u00e2linde telefonla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme hakk\u0131na ili\u015fkin a\u00e7\u0131k bir d\u00fczenlemenin mevcut olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Ancak an\u0131lan d\u00fczenleme g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde ba\u015fvurucuya kay\u0131nbabas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc nedeniyle taziye i\u00e7in telefonla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme hakk\u0131 verilip verilmeyece\u011finin tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir. Bunun yan\u0131nda taziye ile cenazenin s\u00fcreli ve acil i\u015flerden say\u0131l\u0131p say\u0131lmayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n da de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011fi vurgulanmal\u0131d\u0131r. Bu ba\u011flamda ba\u015fvurucunun telefon vas\u0131tas\u0131yla taziye g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesi yapma talebi, ba\u015fvurucunun dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 nedenler ve somut olay\u0131n \u00f6znel ko\u015fullar\u0131 g\u00f6zetilerek aile hayat\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcreklili\u011finin kolayla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 temelinde de\u011ferlendirilmeli ve yeterli gerek\u00e7e ile kar\u015f\u0131lanmal\u0131d\u0131r. Somut olayda ise kamu makamlar\u0131n\u0131n kararlar\u0131 incelendi\u011finde mevzuat taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmeyen ancak yasaklanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 da anla\u015f\u0131lan bir hakk\u0131n verilmemesine ili\u015fkin olarak olu\u015fan zorunluluk h\u00e2llerinin neler oldu\u011funun a\u00e7\u0131klanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespit edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
18. Bununla birlikte telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesi yap\u0131lmak istenen ki\u015fiye dair bilgilerin \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine sunulan talep dilek\u00e7esi kapsam\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtilmedi\u011fi tespit edilmi\u015f ise de bu durumun giderilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn bir eksiklik olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususunda herhangi bir de\u011ferlendirmenin \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi karar\u0131nda yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Kald\u0131 ki an\u0131lan kararda belirlenen eksikli\u011fin A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesine sunulan itiraz dilek\u00e7esinde giderildi\u011fi ve ba\u015fvurucunun kiminle telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesi yapmak istedi\u011fini bildirme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc itiraz dilek\u00e7esiyle yerine getirdi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Ancak bu hususta A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesince bir de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 da belirtilmelidir.<\/p>\n
19. Sonu\u00e7 olarak aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda korunan temas\u0131n s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclmesini sa\u011flamaya y\u00f6nelik olarak mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmleri ve aile durumu da g\u00f6zetilmek suretiyle ba\u015fvurucuya talebe konu hakk\u0131n verilip verilmeyece\u011finin tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi e\u015fiyle haftal\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme hakk\u0131 bulunan ba\u015fvurucunun taziye ama\u00e7l\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme yapma iste\u011finin acil i\u015flerden olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n da irdelenmedi\u011fi s\u00f6ylenebilir. Bu h\u00e2liyle yarg\u0131lama makamlar\u0131n\u0131n kararlar\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvurucunun taziye g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesine ili\u015fkin bireysel menfaatiyle ceza infaz kurumlar\u0131nda g\u00fcvenli\u011fin sa\u011flanmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin kamusal menfaat aras\u0131nda adil bir dengenin g\u00f6zetildi\u011fine dair ilgili ve yeterli gerek\u00e7e i\u00e7ermedi\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu kapsamda m\u00fcdahalenin demokratik toplum d\u00fczeninde gerekli ve \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fc oldu\u011fundan s\u00f6z edilemez.<\/p>\n
20. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa’n\u0131n 20. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan \u00f6zel hayata ve aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M<\/p>\n
21. Ba\u015fvurucu; ihlalin tespiti ve manevi tazminat talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
22. Ba\u015fvurucunun kay\u0131nbabas\u0131n\u0131n 14\/9\/2020 tarihinde vefat etmi\u015f olmas\u0131 sebebiyle taziye g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesi yapmas\u0131n\u0131n faydas\u0131z oldu\u011fu dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda tespit edilen hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
23. \u00d6te yandan ihlalin niteli\u011fi dikkate al\u0131narak ba\u015fvurucuya net 10.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00f6denmesi gerekti\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Adli yard\u0131m talebinin KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n
B. \u00d6zel hayata ve aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
C. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 20. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan \u00f6zel hayata ve aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. Ba\u015fvurucuya net 10.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE, tazminata ili\u015fkin di\u011fer taleplerin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. \u00d6demenin, karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
F. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin bilgi i\u00e7in Ankara Bat\u0131 1. \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine (E.2020\/2156, K.2020\/2304) ve Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 22\/1\/2025 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 22\/1\/2025 tarihli ve 2020\/36095 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 YA\u015eAR AL BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/36095) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 22\/1\/2025 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU \u00a0 \u00a0 Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR Raport\u00f6r : Ay\u015fenur TUNCER Ba\u015fvurucu : Ya\u015far AL \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, tutukluya kay\u0131nbabas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc \u00fczerine taziyede bulunmak i\u00e7in telefonla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme hakk\u0131 verilmemesi nedeniyle \u00f6zel hayata ve aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvuru tarihinde, Sincan T Tipi Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumunda (\u0130nfaz Kurumu) tutuklu olarak bulunan ba\u015fvurucunun kay\u0131nbabas\u0131 14\/9\/2020 tarihinde vefat etmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu 21\/9\/2020 tarihli dilek\u00e7esiyle Ankara Bat\u0131 1. \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine (\u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi) \u015fik\u00e2yette bulunmu\u015ftur. Dilek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zetle; \u0130nfaz Kurumu g\u00f6revlilerine s\u00f6zl\u00fc olarak kay\u0131nbabas\u0131n\u0131n cenazesine kat\u0131lmak istedi\u011fini, bu m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde telefonla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme yapma hakk\u0131n\u0131 kullanmak istedi\u011fini s\u00f6ylemesine ra\u011fmen taraf\u0131na bilgi verilmedi\u011fini ifade etmi\u015ftir. Bu nedenle 16\/9\/2020 tarihli dilek\u00e7esiyle \u0130nfaz Kurumuna talebini yaz\u0131l\u0131 olarak iletti\u011fini ancak talebi hakk\u0131nda herhangi bir karar verilmedi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrerek kay\u0131nbabas\u0131n\u0131n vefat\u0131 nedeniyle telefonla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme hakk\u0131n\u0131n kulland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etmi\u015ftir. 3. \u0130nfaz Kurumunun, \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine sundu\u011fu 21\/9\/2020 tarihli g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f yaz\u0131s\u0131nda; 29\/3\/2020 tarihli ve 31083 say\u0131l\u0131 Resm\u00ee Gazete’de yay\u0131mlanan Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumlar\u0131n\u0131n Y\u00f6netimi ile Ceza ve …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-36493","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n