T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
E. K. BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2019\/3908)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 22\/1\/2025<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Fatih ALKAN<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, temin faaliyeti tamamlanmam\u0131\u015f olan s\u00f6zle\u015fmeli subay aday\u0131n\u0131n temin faaliyetlerinin ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc h\u00e2l kanun h\u00fckm\u00fcnde kararnamesiyle iptal edilmesi ve ili\u015fi\u011finin kesilmesi \u00fczerine a\u00e7\u0131lan davan\u0131n Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc H\u00e2l \u0130\u015flemleri \u0130nceleme Komisyonuna g\u00f6nderilmesi yerine incelenmeksizin reddedilmesi nedeniyle mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucu, T\u00fcrk Silahl\u0131 Kuvvetleri (TSK) b\u00fcnyesinde subay olmak amac\u0131yla 2015 y\u0131l\u0131nda Kara Harp Okulunda s\u00f6zle\u015fmeli subay aday\u0131 stat\u00fcs\u00fcnde kursiyer olarak ba\u015flam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. 3\/10\/2016 tarihli ve 675 say\u0131l\u0131 Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc H\u00e2l (OHAL) Kapsam\u0131nda Baz\u0131 Tedbirler Al\u0131nmas\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararname’nin (675 say\u0131l\u0131 OHAL KHK’s\u0131) 6. maddesinin (a) bendindeki temin faaliyeti tamamlanmam\u0131\u015f astsubay ve subay adaylar\u0131 hakk\u0131ndaki i\u015flemlerin iptal edilmesi kural\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun temin i\u015flemi sonland\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu, s\u00f6z konusu i\u015flemin iptali talebiyle dava a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
4. Ankara 14. \u0130dare Mahkemesi (Mahkeme) 16\/8\/2017 tarihli karar\u0131yla davan\u0131n incelenmeksizin reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. Kararda, 675 say\u0131l\u0131 OHAL KHK’s\u0131 uyar\u0131nca ba\u015fvurucunun subay adayl\u0131\u011f\u0131 stat\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn sonland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve ili\u015fi\u011finin kesildi\u011fi, bu konuda idareye herhangi bir de\u011ferlendirme yapma ya da ba\u015fka y\u00f6nde i\u015flem kurma imk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131n tan\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 vurgulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde, ba\u015fvurucunun subay adayl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin kanun niteli\u011fi ta\u015f\u0131yan hukuki bir d\u00fczenleme ile feshedildi\u011fi, idari davaya konu olabilecek bir i\u015flemin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan s\u00f6z edilmesine olanak bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifade edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucu, Ankara B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesi 4. \u0130dari Dava Dairesine (B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesi) istinaf ba\u015fvurusunda bulunmu\u015ftur. B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesi 31\/10\/2017 tarihli kararla istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun reddine karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. Ba\u015fvurucunun temyiz talebi Dan\u0131\u015ftay Be\u015finci Dairesinin 8\/10\/2018 tarihli karar\u0131yla reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. Ba\u015fvurucu, nihai karar\u0131 18\/1\/2019 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra 1\/2\/2019 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
8. \u00d6deme g\u00fcc\u00fcnden yoksun oldu\u011funu belirten ba\u015fvurucunun adli yard\u0131m talebinin kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi gerekir (Mehmet \u015eerif Ay, B. No: 2012\/1181, 17\/9\/2013).<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fvurucu; 675 say\u0131l\u0131 OHAL KHK’s\u0131 gere\u011fince s\u00f6zle\u015fmeli subay aday\u0131 stat\u00fcs\u00fcnden \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kanun h\u00fckm\u00fcnde kararnamelerle temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerinin k\u0131s\u0131tlanamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu i\u015fleme kar\u015f\u0131 a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 davan\u0131n incelenmeksizin reddedilmesi nedeniyle etkisi geni\u015f olan s\u00f6z konusu i\u015flemin hukuki denetim d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda b\u0131rak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Ba\u015fvurucu; hi\u00e7bir disiplin cezas\u0131 olmamas\u0131na ra\u011fmen \u00f6zel hayat\u0131na ili\u015fkin fi\u015flemeye dayal\u0131 bilgilerle hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 \u015fekilde stat\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn sona erdirildi\u011fini,a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 davada bu iddialar\u0131n\u0131n irdelenmedi\u011fini, usule ve esasa ili\u015fkin iddialar\u0131 hakk\u0131nda bir de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, dava a\u00e7ma hakk\u0131n\u0131n elinden al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n, masumiyet karinesinin ve \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
10. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde, ba\u015fvurucunun temel hak ve h\u00fcrriyetlerinin ihlal edilip edilmedi\u011fi konusunda yap\u0131lacak incelemede Anayasa ve ilgili mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmleri ile somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi, ayr\u0131ca ba\u015fvurucunun s\u00f6zle\u015fmeli subay aday\u0131 kursiyeri stat\u00fcs\u00fcnde e\u011fitim g\u00f6rmekteyken 15 Temmuz 2016 tarihinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen darbe te\u015febb\u00fcs\u00fc s\u0131ras\u0131nda di\u011fer 156 kursiyer\/\u00f6\u011frenciyle birlikte helikopterle Genel Kurmay Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 bah\u00e7esine indirildi\u011fi ve ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda anayasal d\u00fczeni ortadan kald\u0131rmaya te\u015febb\u00fcs etme su\u00e7undan m\u00fcebbet hapis cezas\u0131 verildi\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
11. Ba\u015fvurucunun iddialar\u0131n\u0131n mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmesi gerekti\u011fi de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
12. Anayasa Mahkemesi olay ve olgular\u0131 somut ba\u015fvuru ile benzer nitelikte olan Ayhan Orhanl\u0131 ([GK], B. No: 2019\/7991, 23\/2\/2023) karar\u0131nda, 1\/2\/2018 tarihli ve 7075 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 2. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca OHAL kapsam\u0131ndaki KHK’larla ger\u00e7ek ki\u015filerin hukuki stat\u00fclerine ili\u015fkin olarak do\u011frudan d\u00fczenlenen i\u015flemlerin OHAL Komisyonunun yetkisinde oldu\u011funu belirtmi\u015f; temin faaliyetinin OHAL KHK’s\u0131 ile iptal edilmesi ve nasb\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131lmamas\u0131 \u00fczerine a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 davada keyf\u00eeli\u011fe kar\u015f\u0131 ba\u015fvurucuya anayasal g\u00fcvenceler sa\u011flayacak nitelikte bir yorumla dosyan\u0131n Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc H\u00e2l \u0130\u015flemleri \u0130nceleme Komisyonuna (OHAL Komisyonu) g\u00f6nderilmesi yerine davan\u0131n incelenmeksizin reddedilmesi suretiyle yap\u0131lan m\u00fcdahalenin Anayasa’n\u0131n 15. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen durumun gerektirdi\u011fi \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ba\u015fvurucunun adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
13. Somut olayda, ba\u015fvurucunun temin faaliyetinin OHAL KHK’s\u0131 ile iptal edilmesi ve s\u00f6zle\u015fmeli subay aday\u0131 stat\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn sona erdirilmesi \u00fczerine a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 davada keyf\u00eeli\u011fe kar\u015f\u0131 ba\u015fvurucuya anayasal g\u00fcvenceler sa\u011flayacak nitelikte bir yorumla dosyan\u0131n OHAL Komisyonuna g\u00f6nderilmesi yerine davan\u0131n incelenmeksizin reddedildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden somut ba\u015fvuruda, Ayhan Orhanl\u0131 karar\u0131ndan a\u00e7\u0131klanan ilkelerden ve ula\u015f\u0131lan sonu\u00e7tan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren bir durum bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
14. Ayr\u0131ca yine Ayhan Orhanl\u0131 karar\u0131nda da belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere OHAL Komisyonunun g\u00f6rev s\u00fcresi 22\/1\/2023 tarihinde sona ermi\u015fse de 7075 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’a eklenen ge\u00e7ici 5. maddede g\u00f6rev s\u00fcresinin sona ermesinden sonra Komisyonun g\u00f6revleri kapsam\u0131ndaki hususlarda mahkemelerce verilecek kararlar \u00fczerine yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekli i\u015f ve i\u015flemleri y\u00fcr\u00fctecek kurum ve kurulu\u015flar belirlenmi\u015ftir. Bu itibarla ba\u015fvurucunun Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
15. Mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in di\u011fer haklara y\u00f6nelik ihlal iddialar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ayr\u0131ca de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmas\u0131na gerek olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M <\/p>\n
16. Ba\u015fvurucu, ihlalin tespiti ile yarg\u0131laman\u0131n yenilenmesine ve 1.000.000 TL manevi tazminata karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
17. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamda karar\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi yarg\u0131 mercilerince yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden yarg\u0131lama i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flatmak ve Anayasa Mahkemesini ihlal sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131ran nedenleri gideren, ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere uygun yeni bir karar vermektir (6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 50. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen bireysel ba\u015fvuruya \u00f6zg\u00fc yeniden yarg\u0131lama kurumunun \u00f6zelliklerine ili\u015fkin kapsaml\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamalar i\u00e7in bkz. Mehmet Do\u011fan [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n
18. \u0130hlalin ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n yeterli giderim sa\u011flayaca\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan tazminat talebinin reddine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Adli yard\u0131m talebinin KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n
B. Mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
C. Anayasa’n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. Di\u011fer ihlal iddialar\u0131n\u0131n \u0130NCELENMES\u0130NE GEREK OLMADI\u011eINA,<\/p>\n
E. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere Ankara 14. \u0130dare Mahkemesine (E.2017\/2334, K.2017\/2578) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
F. Ba\u015fvurucunun tazminat talebinin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
G. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 22\/1\/2025 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 22\/1\/2025 tarihli ve 2019\/3908 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 E. K. BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2019\/3908) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 22\/1\/2025 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU \u00a0 \u00a0 Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR Raport\u00f6r : Fatih ALKAN Ba\u015fvurucu : \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, temin faaliyeti tamamlanmam\u0131\u015f olan s\u00f6zle\u015fmeli subay aday\u0131n\u0131n temin faaliyetlerinin ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc h\u00e2l kanun h\u00fckm\u00fcnde kararnamesiyle iptal edilmesi ve ili\u015fi\u011finin kesilmesi \u00fczerine a\u00e7\u0131lan davan\u0131n Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc H\u00e2l \u0130\u015flemleri \u0130nceleme Komisyonuna g\u00f6nderilmesi yerine incelenmeksizin reddedilmesi nedeniyle mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu, T\u00fcrk Silahl\u0131 Kuvvetleri (TSK) b\u00fcnyesinde subay olmak amac\u0131yla 2015 y\u0131l\u0131nda Kara Harp Okulunda s\u00f6zle\u015fmeli subay aday\u0131 stat\u00fcs\u00fcnde kursiyer olarak ba\u015flam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 3. 3\/10\/2016 tarihli ve 675 say\u0131l\u0131 Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc H\u00e2l (OHAL) Kapsam\u0131nda Baz\u0131 Tedbirler Al\u0131nmas\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararname’nin (675 say\u0131l\u0131 OHAL KHK’s\u0131) 6. maddesinin (a) bendindeki temin faaliyeti tamamlanmam\u0131\u015f astsubay ve subay adaylar\u0131 hakk\u0131ndaki i\u015flemlerin iptal edilmesi kural\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun temin i\u015flemi sonland\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu, s\u00f6z konusu i\u015flemin iptali talebiyle dava a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 4. Ankara 14. \u0130dare Mahkemesi (Mahkeme) 16\/8\/2017 tarihli karar\u0131yla davan\u0131n incelenmeksizin reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. Kararda, 675 say\u0131l\u0131 OHAL KHK’s\u0131 uyar\u0131nca ba\u015fvurucunun subay adayl\u0131\u011f\u0131 stat\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn sonland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve ili\u015fi\u011finin kesildi\u011fi, bu konuda …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-36486","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n