T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
BURAK B\u00dcY\u00dcKBALBEKMEZ BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2022\/21689)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 7\/1\/2025<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Recai AKYEL<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Selahaddin MENTE\u015e<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Muhterem \u0130NCE<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Ay\u00e7a GAN\u0130DA\u011eLI DEM\u0130RC\u0130<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Burak B\u00dcY\u00dcKBALBEKMEZ<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Sinan \u00d6ZBEY<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, beyanlar\u0131 belirleyici \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nan tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n duru\u015fmada sorgulanamamas\u0131 nedeniyle tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Konya ilinde narkotik su\u00e7larla m\u00fccadele kapsam\u0131nda yap\u0131lan \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalarda ba\u015fvurucunun uyu\u015fturucu madde ticareti yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususunda bilgiler al\u0131nmas\u0131 \u00fczerine Konya Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) soru\u015fturmaya ba\u015fland\u0131\u011f\u0131, ba\u015fvurucunun kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 telefon \u00fczerinde ileti\u015fimin dinlenmesi ve kayda al\u0131nmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin karar al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu kapsamda yap\u0131lan \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar do\u011frultusunda be\u015f ayr\u0131 olay tespiti yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
3. Olay 1 kapsam\u0131nda; 25\/5\/2018 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucunun tan\u0131k Ali ile yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesi do\u011frultusunda ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn saat 22.15 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda fiziki takibe ba\u015fland\u0131\u011f\u0131, yap\u0131lan fiziki takipte ba\u015fvurucunun belirlenen adresteki ikametg\u00e2h\u0131 \u00f6n\u00fcnde bir m\u00fcddet bekledikten sonra ikametg\u00e2h\u0131n i\u00e7ine girdi\u011fi vetan\u0131k olarak beyanlar\u0131 al\u0131nan A.G.K.nin ve G.B.nin de s\u00f6z konusu ikametg\u00e2ha girdi\u011fi, k\u0131sa bir s\u00fcre sonra tan\u0131klar\u0131n ikametg\u00e2htan \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, fiziki takibe son verilerek tan\u0131klar A.G.K.nin ve G.B.nin \u00fczerlerinde yap\u0131lan aramada suboxone hap ile eroin maddesi ele ge\u00e7irildi\u011fi, tan\u0131klar\u0131n soru\u015fturma evresindeki beyanlar\u0131nda \u00fczerlerinde ele ge\u00e7irilen suboxone hap ve eroin maddesini ba\u015fvurucudan almad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 beyan ettikleri anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
4. Olay 2 kapsam\u0131nda; 25\/7\/2018 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucu ile tan\u0131k S.D. aras\u0131ndaki telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeleri do\u011frultusunda ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn saat 13.48 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda fiziki takibe ba\u015fland\u0131\u011f\u0131, ba\u015fvurucunun, tan\u0131k olarak beyanlar\u0131 al\u0131nan H.\u00c7. ve S.D. ile bulu\u015farak y\u00fcr\u00fcmeye ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu esnada tan\u0131k olarak beyan\u0131 al\u0131nan H.G.nin de bu \u015fah\u0131slar ile bulu\u015ftu\u011fu, bir m\u00fcddet sonra ba\u015fvurucunun tan\u0131klar\u0131n yan\u0131ndan ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, fiziki takibe son verilerek yap\u0131lan yakalamada tan\u0131klar H.\u00c7.nin ve H.G.nin \u00fczerlerinde toplamda 7 adet Lyrica hap ele ge\u00e7irildi\u011fi, tan\u0131klar\u0131n soru\u015fturma evresindeki beyanlar\u0131nda \u00fczerlerinde ele ge\u00e7irilen Lyrica haplar\u0131n\u0131 ba\u015fvurucudan almad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 beyan ettikleri anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
5. Olay 3 kapsam\u0131nda;27\/7\/2018 g\u00fcn\u00fc ba\u015fvurucu ile tan\u0131k C.K. aras\u0131ndaki telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeleri do\u011frultusunda ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn saat 17.15 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda fiziki takibe ba\u015fland\u0131\u011f\u0131, tan\u0131k olarak beyan\u0131 al\u0131nan C.K. n\u0131n belirlenen adrese girdi\u011fi ve bir m\u00fcddet sonra ba\u015fvurucu birlikte \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n tek ba\u015f\u0131na yaya olarak gitmekte oldu\u011funun g\u00f6r\u00fclmesi \u00fczerine fiziki takibe son verilerek tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00fczerinde yap\u0131lan aramada 9 adet Lyrica hap ele ge\u00e7irildi\u011fi, tan\u0131k C.K.n\u0131n a\u015famalardaki beyan\u0131nda \u00fczerinde ele ge\u00e7irilen Lyrica haplar\u0131n\u0131 ba\u015fvurucudan almad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan etti\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
6. Olay 4 kapsam\u0131nda; 11\/8\/2018 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucu ve tan\u0131k olarak beyan\u0131 al\u0131nan S.A. aras\u0131ndaki telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmelerinden uyu\u015fturucu madde al\u0131m sat\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015f ve ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn saat 13.10 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda fiziki takibe ba\u015flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Yakla\u015f\u0131k 10 dakika sonra S.A. isimli \u015fahs\u0131n ba\u015fvurucunun bulundu\u011fu s\u00f6z konusu adrese girdi\u011finin, bir s\u00fcre sonra saat 13.39’da evden \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fclmesi \u00fczerine fiziki takibe son verilerek, tan\u0131k S.A. 13.40’ta polis memurlar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan durdurulmu\u015f ve tan\u0131k \u00fczerinde yap\u0131lan aramada 0,2 gram eroin maddesi ele ge\u00e7irilmi\u015ftir. Tan\u0131k S.A.n\u0131n yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ilk al\u0131nan 11\/8\/2018 tarihli beyan\u0131nda; maddeyi \u015e\u00fckran Mahallesi’nde (fiziki takibe g\u00f6re uyu\u015fturucu ticareti yap\u0131lan yer) daha \u00f6nce uyu\u015fturucu madde ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015fah\u0131stan ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve olay yerinden ayr\u0131l\u0131rken polis memurlar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtti\u011fi ve kollukta te\u015fhiste bulundu\u011fu tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n operasyondan sonra 16\/11\/2018 tarihinde al\u0131nan kolluk a\u015famas\u0131 beyan\u0131nda ise olay tarihinde ba\u015fvurucudan eroini 50 TL kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda sat\u0131n ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan etti\u011fi, soru\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 huzurunda verdi\u011fi ifadesinde de benzer beyanda bulundu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. S.A.n\u0131n 16\/11\/2018 tarihli Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k ifadesinin ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“Ben bu konu hakk\u0131nda 16\/11\/2018 tarihinde Konya Narkotik \u015eube M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde tan\u0131k s\u0131fat\u0131yla ifade verdim ve te\u015fhiste bulundum. Bu ifadem ve te\u015fhis tutana\u011f\u0131 do\u011frudur. Ben yakla\u015f\u0131k 7 y\u0131ld\u0131r uyu\u015fturucu Eroin maddesi kullan\u0131r\u0131m. 15\/08\/2018 tarihinde 50 TL kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda Burak B\u00dcY\u00dcKBALBEKMEZ isimli \u015fah\u0131stan Eroin maddesi sat\u0131n alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131m. Buna ili\u015fkin emniyette ifade verdim ve te\u015fhiste bulundum. \u0130fadem ve te\u015fhis tutana\u011f\u0131 do\u011frudur. Aynen tekrar ediyorum. Ekleyece\u011fim ba\u015fka bir husus yoktur.”<\/p>\n
7. Olay 4 kapsam\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun soru\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131ndaki beyan\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
” [S. A.] isimli \u015fahs\u0131 tan\u0131r\u0131m. Ablam kendisinin \u00e7ocu\u011funa bak\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k yapar. Olay g\u00fcn\u00fcne ili\u015fkin mesajla\u015fma ve telefon kay\u0131tlar\u0131 taraf\u0131ma okundu. G\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme i\u00e7erikleri do\u011frudur.[S.A.] uyu\u015fturucu hap kullan\u0131r. Olay g\u00fcn\u00fc ikametimize geldi. Kendisine uyu\u015fturucu hap sat\u0131n alaca\u011f\u0131 ki\u015finin numaras\u0131n\u0131 verdim. Bu \u015fekilde evden ayr\u0131ld\u0131. Olay g\u00fcn\u00fcne ili\u015fkin fiziki takip tutana\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ma okundu. Tutanak do\u011frudur, ancak [S.A.dan] ele ge\u00e7irilen0,2 gram eroin maddesini ben satmad\u0131m. Bizim ikamette [E.T.] isminde bir bayan \u015fah\u0131s daha ya\u015famaktad\u0131r. Kendiside uyu\u015fturucu ve eroin maddesi ba\u011f\u0131ml\u0131s\u0131d\u0131r. Sat\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131 yapmaz. Baz\u0131 kullan\u0131c\u0131lara uyu\u015fturucu maddesi al\u0131m\u0131nda arac\u0131l\u0131k eder. Olay g\u00fcn\u00fc ben takipte oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in [E.T.ye] gelen \u015fah\u0131slar\u0131 da benim al\u0131mc\u0131mm\u0131\u015f gibi g\u00f6steriyorlar. Bu olayda [S.A.ya] [E.T.nin] eroin temin etti\u011fini d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcyorum. Aleyhime olan beyan ve te\u015fhisleri kabul etmiyorum.” <\/p>\n
8. Olay 5 kapsam\u0131nda; ba\u015fvurucunun ikametinde yap\u0131lan aramada 1 paket h\u00e2linde 0,2 gram eroin ve eroin paketlemesinde kullan\u0131lan 11 adet sa\u00e7 tokas\u0131 ve 1 adet k\u00fcrek tabir edilen ka\u011f\u0131t par\u00e7as\u0131 ele ge\u00e7irildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Olay 5 kapsam\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucu soru\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131ndaki beyan\u0131nda, ikamet aramas\u0131nda ele ge\u00e7irilen eroin maddesinin, sa\u00e7 tokalar\u0131n\u0131n, k\u00fcrek diye tabir edilen ka\u011f\u0131t par\u00e7alar\u0131n\u0131n kendisine ait olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, tokalar\u0131n evde bulunan k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck \u00e7ocuklara ait olabilece\u011fini ifade etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan Emniyet Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc Kriminal Polis Laboratuvar\u0131 Daire Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na yaz\u0131 yaz\u0131larak ba\u015fvurucunun evinde ele ge\u00e7irilen toplam daral\u0131 a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131 0,2 gram gelen s\u00f6z konusu uyu\u015fturucu maddenin analizinin yap\u0131larak maddenin niteli\u011fi, i\u00e7erdi\u011fi etken maddeler, ne kadar uyu\u015fturucu elde edilebilece\u011fi ve tutar\u0131na ili\u015fkin g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f bildirir rapor d\u00fczenlenmesi istenmi\u015ftir. 9\/1\/2019 tarihli Ankara Kriminal Polis Laboratuvar\u0131 Daire Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131nca g\u00f6nderilen raporda; s\u00f6z konusu maddenin, uyu\u015fturucu maddelerden eroin i\u00e7erdi\u011fi ve i\u00e7erdi\u011fi eroin miktar\u0131n\u0131n 420 oran\u0131nda olmak \u00fczere 0,02 gram (yirmi miligram) oldu\u011funun belirlendi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
10. Soru\u015fturman\u0131n tamamlanmas\u0131n\u0131 m\u00fcteakip Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda uyu\u015fturucu veya uyar\u0131c\u0131 madde ticareti yapma su\u00e7undan 25\/3\/2019 tarihinde iddianame d\u00fczenlemi\u015ftir. \u0130ddianamede ba\u015fvurucunun Olay 1, 2, 3 ve 4 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden zincirleme olarak uyu\u015fturucu madde ticareti su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011fi, Olay 5 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ele ge\u00e7en maddeleri ticari ama\u00e7la bulundurdu\u011funun anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespitlerine yer verilmi\u015ftir. \u0130leti\u015fimin denetlenmesi tedbiri kapsam\u0131nda elde edilen g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme kay\u0131tlar\u0131, kolluk ara\u015ft\u0131rma tutanaklar\u0131, uzmanl\u0131k raporlar\u0131, olay yeri tespit tutanaklar\u0131, arama ve elkoyma tutanaklar\u0131, fiziki takip tutanaklar\u0131, \u015f\u00fcphelilerin ikrarlar\u0131 ve t\u00fcm soru\u015fturma evrak\u0131 dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun ayn\u0131 su\u00e7u i\u015fleme icras\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda zincirleme olacak \u015fekilde uyu\u015fturucu madde satmak\/ticari ama\u00e7la uyu\u015fturucu madde bulundurmak su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011fi iddia edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
11. Konya 3. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesince (Mahkeme) g\u00f6r\u00fclen davada 1\/4\/2019 tarihinde d\u00fczenlenen Tensip Tutana\u011f\u0131 ile tan\u0131klar A.G.K., H.G., S.D., C.K.ve S.A.n\u0131n bilgi ve g\u00f6rg\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn tespiti amac\u0131yla i\u015fin tutuklu i\u015f olu\u015fu g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131narak haklar\u0131nda zorla getirme emri d\u00fczenlenmesine, duru\u015fman\u0131n 9\/7\/2019 tarihine b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
12. Yarg\u0131laman\u0131n 9\/7\/2019 tarihli ilk celsesinde ba\u015fvurucu, m\u00fcdafii huzurunda savunmas\u0131n\u0131 yapm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu, Olay 4 kapsam\u0131nda savunmas\u0131nda; S.A.y\u0131, teyzesi S.A.n\u0131n \u00e7ocu\u011funa bakt\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in tan\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, olay tarihinde telefonda konu\u015ftuklar\u0131n\u0131 ve bulu\u015ftuklar\u0131n\u0131, krizde oldu\u011funu, Lyrica hap istedi\u011fini, kendisine \u015fu an yan\u0131nda hap olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, “3-4 saat sonra bulu\u015fal\u0131m, ben sana hap vereyim.” dedi\u011fini ifade etmi\u015ftir. Sonra S.A.n\u0131n evden \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kesinlikle bu ki\u015fiye eroini satmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, \u00fczerinde ele ge\u00e7en eroini kimden ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 veya neden kendisinden eroin ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi\u011fini bilmedi\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir. Olay 5 kapsam\u0131ndaki savunmas\u0131nda; evde ele ge\u00e7en eroin maddesinin kendisine ait olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, teyzesinin k\u0131z\u0131 olan E.T.nin uyu\u015fturucu kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve ele ge\u00e7en eroinin ona ait oldu\u011funu ifade etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
13. Ayr\u0131ca yarg\u0131laman\u0131n 9\/7\/2019 tarihli ilk celsesinde tan\u0131klar A.G.K., H.G., S.D., C.K. Mahkeme huzurunda; Ba\u015fka su\u00e7tan tutuklu tan\u0131klar G.B. ve H.\u00c7. ise Ses ve G\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc Bili\u015fim Sistemi (SEGB\u0130S) ile dinlenmi\u015ftir. Tan\u0131klar\u0131n beyanlar\u0131nda \u00fczerlerinde ele ge\u00e7irilen maddeleri ba\u015fvurucudan almad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 beyan ettikleri anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ayn\u0131 celse gelmeyen tan\u0131k S.A. hakk\u0131nda tekrar zorla getirme emri d\u00fczenlenmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
14. Yarg\u0131laman\u0131n 8\/10\/2019 tarihli \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc celsesinde mahkeme huzurunda dinlenen tan\u0131k E.T. beyan\u0131nda; daha \u00f6nceden e\u015fi taraf\u0131ndan uyu\u015fturucuya al\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ba\u015fvurucunun teyzesinin o\u011flu oldu\u011funu, ba\u015fvurucunun evinde yap\u0131lan aramada ele ge\u00e7en eroinin kendisine ait oldu\u011funu beyan etmi\u015ftir. Ayn\u0131 celse aramalara ra\u011fmen temin edilemeyen tan\u0131k S.A.n\u0131n dinlenmesine ili\u015fkin ara karar\u0131ndan vazge\u00e7ilmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Bu celse iddia makam\u0131 esas hakk\u0131nda m\u00fctalaas\u0131n\u0131 sunmu\u015f, ba\u015fvurucu ve m\u00fcdafii her ne kadar evde eroin maddesi ele ge\u00e7irilmi\u015fse de ba\u015fvurucunun eroin kullan\u0131c\u0131s\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, sadece Lyrica hap kullanmakta oldu\u011fu savunmalar\u0131nda bulunmu\u015f ve ayr\u0131ca m\u00fctalaaya kar\u015f\u0131 savunmalar\u0131n\u0131 haz\u0131rlamak \u00fczere s\u00fcre talep etmi\u015ftir. Mahkemece, ba\u015fvurucu ve m\u00fcdafiine esas hakk\u0131nda savunmalar\u0131n\u0131 haz\u0131rlamak \u00fczere s\u00fcre verilmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
15. Mahkemece 5\/11\/2019 tarihli kararla, ba\u015fvurucunun uyu\u015fturucu veya uyar\u0131c\u0131 madde ticareti yapma veya sa\u011flama su\u00e7undan 12 y\u0131l 6 ay hapis ve 25.000 TL adli para cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir. Mahkeme gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131nda Olay 1, 2 ve 3 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ba\u015fvurucunun \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 uyu\u015fturucu veya uyar\u0131c\u0131 madde ticareti su\u00e7unun s\u00fcbut bulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kanaatine var\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir. S\u00fcbut buldu\u011funa kanaat getirilen olay 4 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ise; tan\u0131k S.A.n\u0131n a\u015famalardaki istikrarl\u0131 anlat\u0131m\u0131, usul\u00fcne uygun yap\u0131lan fiziki takibin hemen akabinde tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n ba\u015fvurucunun evinden ayr\u0131ld\u0131ktan bir dakika sonra \u00fczerinde su\u00e7a konu eroin maddesinin ele ge\u00e7irilmesi, tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n ilk yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131nda eroin maddesini yeni ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015f olmas\u0131, bu beyan\u0131nda fiziki takiple uyumlu olmas\u0131, olay \u00f6ncesinde ba\u015fvurucu ile tan\u0131k aras\u0131nda ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmelerinin de uyu\u015fturucu teminine y\u00f6nelik yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131na dayan\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ayr\u0131ca ba\u015fvurucunun da soru\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda tan\u0131k S.A.n\u0131n evine geldi\u011fini, kendisine uyu\u015fturucu madde alaca\u011f\u0131 ki\u015finin numaras\u0131n\u0131 verdi\u011fini, kovu\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda ise, tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n krizde oldu\u011funu ve Lyrica hap laz\u0131m dedi\u011fini, onun ise “Abla \u015fuan yan\u0131mda hap yok, 3-4 saat sonra bulu\u015fal\u0131m ben sana hap vereyim.” diye cevap verdi\u011fi \u015feklinde \u00e7eli\u015fki beyanlarda bulunmas\u0131 ve uyu\u015fturucu madde olay\u0131n\u0131n do\u011frulamas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun savunmas\u0131n\u0131n kendisini su\u00e7tan kurtarmaya y\u00f6nelik oldu\u011fu kabul edildi\u011fi ve savunmalar\u0131na itibar edilmedi\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“Olay 4 kapsam\u0131nda; Su\u00e7 tarihi olan 11\/08\/2018 g\u00fcn\u00fc san\u0131k ile tan\u0131k olarak beyan\u0131 al\u0131nan [S.A.] aras\u0131ndaki telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmelerinden uyu\u015fturucu madde al\u0131m sat\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirildi\u011fi ve ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn saat 13.10 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda fiziki takibe ba\u015fland\u0131\u011f\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n Abdulaziz mahallesi H\u00fcnkar sokak \u00fczerinde oldu\u011funun g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, bir s\u00fcre sonra Ahmet K\u00fc\u00e7\u00fckarma\u011fan sokak No:25 say\u0131l\u0131 ikamete girdi\u011fi, yakla\u015f\u0131k 10 dakika sonra [S.A.] isimli \u015fahs\u0131n s\u00f6z konusu adrese girdi\u011fi, bir s\u00fcre sonra saat 13.39’da evde \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fclmesi \u00fczerine fiziki takibe son verilerek, tan\u0131k [S.A.] 13.40’da polis memurlar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan durduruldu\u011fu ve tan\u0131k \u00fczerinde yap\u0131lan aramada 0,2 gram eroin maddesinin ele ge\u00e7irildi\u011fi, tan\u0131k [S.A.] yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ilk al\u0131nan 11\/08\/2018 tarihli beyan\u0131nda maddeyi \u015e\u00fckran Mahallesinde ( fiziki takibe g\u00f6re uyu\u015fturucu ticareti yap\u0131lan yer ) daha \u00f6nce uyu\u015fturucu madde ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015fah\u0131stan ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve olay yerinden ayr\u0131l\u0131rken polis memurlar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtti\u011fi, tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n daha sonra operasyondan sonra 16\/11\/2018 tarihinde al\u0131nan beyan\u0131nda olay tarihinde Burak B\u00fcy\u00fckbalbekmez isimli \u015fah\u0131stan eroin maddesini 50 TL kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda sat\u0131n ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan etti\u011fi, soru\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda C. Savc\u0131s\u0131na verdi\u011fi ifadesinde de bu beyan\u0131n\u0131 s\u00fcrd\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, kollukta te\u015fhiste bulundu\u011fu,<\/p>\n
San\u0131k Burak B\u00fcy\u00fckbalbekmez a\u015famalardaki savunmas\u0131nda \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7lamay\u0131 inkar etmi\u015f ise de; tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n a\u015famalardaki istikrarl\u0131 anlat\u0131m\u0131, usul\u00fcne uygun yap\u0131lan fiziki takibin hemen akabindetan\u0131\u011f\u0131n san\u0131\u011f\u0131n evinden ayr\u0131ld\u0131ktan 1 dakika sonra \u00fczerinde su\u00e7a konu eroin maddesinin ele ge\u00e7irilmesi, tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n ilk yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131nda eroin maddesini yeni ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015f olmas\u0131, bu beyan\u0131nda fiziki takiple uyumlu olmas\u0131, olay \u00f6ncesinde san\u0131k ile tan\u0131k aras\u0131nda ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmelerinin de uyu\u015fturucu teminine y\u00f6nelik yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n da soru\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda tan\u0131k [S.A.n\u0131n] evine geldi\u011fini kendisine uyu\u015fturucu madde alaca\u011f\u0131 ki\u015finin numaras\u0131n\u0131 verdi\u011fini, kovu\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda ise tan\u0131k bana ‘ben krizdeyim lyrica hap laz\u0131m diye s\u00f6yledi. Bende kendisine abla \u015fuan yan\u0131mda hap yok. 3-4 saat sonra bulu\u015fal\u0131m ben sana hap vereyim dedim. Sonra evden \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131 gitti.’ \u015feklinde \u00e7eli\u015fki beyanlarda bulunmas\u0131 ve tevilli \u015fekilde uyu\u015fturucu madde olay\u0131n\u0131n do\u011frulamas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n savunmas\u0131n\u0131n kendisini su\u00e7tan kurtarmaya y\u00f6nelik oldu\u011fu kabul edilmi\u015f savunmalar\u0131na itibar edilmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Ele ge\u00e7irilen s\u00f6z konusu maddenin, eroin i\u00e7erdi\u011fininbelirtildi\u011fine dair Ankara Kriminal Polis Laboratuvar\u0131n\u0131n12\/09\/2018 g\u00fcn ve18-07309 say\u0131l\u0131 uzmanl\u0131k raporunun dosyam\u0131za kondu\u011fu, <\/p>\n
\u0130leti\u015fimin tespiti karar\u0131, telefon kay\u0131tlar\u0131, fiziki takip tutana\u011f\u0131, tan\u0131k beyan\u0131, kriminal rapor, san\u0131k savunmas\u0131 ve t\u00fcm dosya kapsam\u0131 birlikte de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde olay 4 kapsam\u0131nda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 uyu\u015fturucu veya uyar\u0131c\u0131 madde ticareti yapma veya sa\u011flama su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011fi hususunda Mahkememizde tam bir vicdani kanaat olu\u015fmakla, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n bu olay kapsam\u0131nda cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 cihetine gidilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Olay 5 kapsam\u0131nda; San\u0131\u011f\u0131n ikametinde yap\u0131lan aramada 1 paket halinde 0,2 gram eroin maddesi ve eroin paketlemesinde kullan\u0131lan 11 adet sa\u00e7 tokas\u0131 ve 1 adet k\u00fcrek tabir edilen ka\u011f\u0131t par\u00e7as\u0131 ele ge\u00e7irildi\u011fi, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n bu eroin maddesini de ticari ama\u00e7la bulundurdu\u011fu, di\u011fer malzemeleri de uyu\u015fturucu ticaretinde kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirildi\u011fi, her ne kadar tan\u0131k [E.T.] s\u00f6z konusu maddelerin kendisine ait oldu\u011funu belirtmi\u015f ise de, UYAP kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n sorgulamas\u0131nda [E.T.nin] daha \u00f6nceki bir tarihte cezaevine girmi\u015f olmas\u0131 ve olay tarihinde evde olmamas\u0131 nedeniyle bu beyana itibar edilmemi\u015f ve su\u00e7a konu eroin ve di\u011fer malzemelerin san\u0131\u011fa ait oldu\u011fu kabul olunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
…<\/p>\n
San\u0131\u011f\u0131n s\u00fcbut bulan olay 4 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 694 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK ile de\u011fi\u015fik TCK 188\/3 maddesi gere\u011fince cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, uyu\u015fturucu sat\u0131m\u0131na konu maddenin eroin oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmakla cezas\u0131ndan TCK 188\/4-a maddesi gere\u011fince yar\u0131 oran\u0131nda art\u0131r\u0131m yap\u0131lmas\u0131na dair a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki \u015fekilde karar verilmi\u015ftir.”<\/p>\n
16. H\u00fck\u00fcm kanun yolu incelemesinden ge\u00e7erek kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, gerek\u00e7eli temyiz dilek\u00e7esinde di\u011ferlerinin yan\u0131 s\u0131ra mahkemede dinlenmeyen tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131na dayan\u0131larak mahk\u0217m edildi\u011fini belirterek temyiz talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fvurucu nihai karar\u0131 17\/1\/2022 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frenmesinin ard\u0131ndan 15\/2\/2022 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
17. Komisyon; adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131n\u0131n d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki \u015fik\u00e2yetlerin kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa, an\u0131lan hakka ili\u015fkin \u015fik\u00e2yetin kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
18. \u00d6deme g\u00fcc\u00fcnden yoksun oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurucunun adli yard\u0131m talebinin kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
A. Tan\u0131k Sorgulama Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
19. Ba\u015fvurucu; beyanlar\u0131 mahk\u0217miyet h\u00fckm\u00fcne esas al\u0131nan tan\u0131k S.A.n\u0131n duru\u015fmada haz\u0131r edilmedi\u011fini, soru\u015fturma evresinde dosyaya eklenen tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n kovu\u015fturma evresinde tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lmamas\u0131 nedeniyle adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
20. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde; kabul edilebilirlik incelemesinde iddialar\u0131n kanun yolu \u015fik\u00e2yeti niteli\u011finde olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Bakanl\u0131k, ilgili mevzuata ve Anayasa Mahkemesi i\u00e7tihad\u0131na yer vererek ba\u015fvuru incelenirken Anayasa’n\u0131n, an\u0131lan mevzuat ve i\u00e7tihad\u0131n yan\u0131 s\u0131ra somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011fini ifade etmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
21. Ba\u015fvurunun bu k\u0131sm\u0131 adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden incelenmi\u015ftir. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
22. Anayasa Mahkemesi, bir\u00e7ok karar\u0131nda tan\u0131k kavram\u0131n\u0131 san\u0131\u011fa isnat edilen fiil hakk\u0131nda bilgi veren herhangi bir ki\u015fi \u015feklinde \u00f6zerk olarak yorumlam\u0131\u015f ve tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131 ile ilgili ilkeleri belirlemi\u015ftir (Atila O\u011fuz Boyal\u0131, B. No: 2013\/99, 20\/3\/2014; Sel\u00e7uk Demir, B. No: 2014\/9783, 22\/1\/2015; AZ. M., B. No: 2013\/560, 16\/4\/2015; Baran Karada\u011f, B. No: 2014\/12906, 7\/5\/2015; Orhan G\u00fclery\u00fcz, B. No: 2019\/30221, 28\/12\/2021). Buna g\u00f6re bir ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131nda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n aleyhine olan tan\u0131klar\u0131 sorgulama veya sorgulatma hakk\u0131 vard\u0131r. Hakk\u0131nda ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 s\u00fcrecinde san\u0131\u011f\u0131n tan\u0131klara soru y\u00f6neltebilmesi, onlarla y\u00fczle\u015febilmesi ve tan\u0131klar\u0131n beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n do\u011frulu\u011funu s\u0131nama imk\u00e2n\u0131na sahip olmas\u0131 adil bir yarg\u0131laman\u0131n yap\u0131labilmesi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan gereklidir (AZ. M., \u00a7 55). Di\u011fer yandan bir mahk\u00fbmiyet -sadece veya belirleyici \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde- san\u0131\u011f\u0131n soru\u015fturma veya kovu\u015fturma evresinde sorgulama veya sorgulatma imk\u00e2n\u0131 bulamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir kimse taraf\u0131ndan verilen ifadelere dayand\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve dengeleyici g\u00fcvenceler sa\u011flayan bir usul \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f ise san\u0131\u011f\u0131n haklar\u0131 Anayasa’n\u0131n 36. maddesindeki g\u00fcvencelerle ba\u011fda\u015fmayacak \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde k\u0131s\u0131tlanm\u0131\u015f olur (Orhan G\u00fclery\u00fcz, \u00a7 35).<\/p>\n
23. Anayasa Mahkemesi tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131yla ilgili olarak verdi\u011fi kararlar\u0131nda somut bir duru\u015fma \u00f6ncesinde veya haricinde elde edilen tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n delil olarak kabul\u00fcn\u00fcn yarg\u0131laman\u0131n adilli\u011fine zarar verip vermedi\u011fini de\u011ferlendirmek i\u00e7in \u00fc\u00e7 a\u015famal\u0131 bir test uygulanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini ifade etmektedir. Buna g\u00f6re ilk olarak tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n mahkemede haz\u0131r edilmemesinin ge\u00e7erli bir nedeninin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131na bak\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. \u0130kinci olarak san\u0131\u011f\u0131n sorgulama veya sorgulatma imk\u00e2n\u0131 bulamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tan\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan verilen beyan\u0131n mahk\u00fbmiyetin dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 tek veya belirleyici delil olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmelidir. Sorgulama veya sorgulatma imk\u00e2n\u0131 tan\u0131nmayan tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n beyan\u0131n\u0131n tek veya belirleyici delil oldu\u011funun tespit edilmesi durumunda ise \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc a\u015fama olarak savunma taraf\u0131n\u0131n maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 bu zorluklar\u0131n telafi edilmesi amac\u0131yla yeterli d\u00fczeyde kar\u015f\u0131 dengeleyici g\u00fcvenceler sa\u011flayan bir usul\u00fcn y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fcl\u00fcp y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmedi\u011fi ortaya konulmal\u0131d\u0131r (baz\u0131 de\u011fi\u015fikliklerle birlikte bkz. Abdurrahim Balur, B. No: 2013\/5467, 7\/1\/2016, \u00a7 80; Onur Urbay, B. No: 2014\/6222, 6\/3\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 36, 40; Zekeriya Sevim, B. No: 2018\/18989, 16\/6\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 44, 51). Bu kapsamda h\u00fckme ula\u015f\u0131l\u0131rken sorgulanmam\u0131\u015f tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n beyan\u0131n\u0131 destekleyen ba\u015fka do\u011frulay\u0131c\u0131 delillere dayan\u0131lmas\u0131 telafi edici g\u00fcvencelerden biri olarak kabul edilebilir (Orhan G\u00fclery\u00fcz, \u00a7 39). Duru\u015fmada sorgulanmayan tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n beyan\u0131n\u0131n g\u00fcvenilirli\u011finin ve do\u011frulu\u011funun saptanmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla savunma taraf\u0131na sa\u011flanabilecek bir di\u011fer telafi edici g\u00fcvence, san\u0131\u011fa olay\u0131n kendi versiyonunu anlatma ve delillerini sunma imk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131n tan\u0131nmas\u0131d\u0131r (Orhan G\u00fclery\u00fcz, \u00a7 40). Yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fcten mahkemenin yarg\u0131 \u00e7evresi d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki tan\u0131klar\u0131n savunman\u0131n onlara soru sormas\u0131na imk\u00e2n sa\u011flayacak \u015fekilde SEGB\u0130S gibi vas\u0131talarla dinlenilmesi de telafi edici g\u00fcvencelerden biri olarak de\u011ferlendirilebilir (Metin Akdemir (2), B. No: 2020\/3964, 21\/9\/2022 \u00a7 36).<\/p>\n
24. Ba\u015fvuru konusu olayda incelenmesi gereken ilk sorun, beyan\u0131 delil olarak kabul edilen tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n duru\u015fmada dinlenmemesinin ge\u00e7erli bir nedene dayan\u0131p dayanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131d\u0131r. Mahkemece 1\/4\/2019 tarihinde d\u00fczenlenen Tensip Tutana\u011f\u0131 ile ve yarg\u0131laman\u0131n 9\/7\/2019 tarihli ilk celsesinde tan\u0131k S.A. hakk\u0131nda zorla getirme emri d\u00fczenlenmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Yarg\u0131laman\u0131n 8\/10\/2019 tarihli \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc celsesinde ise aramalara ra\u011fmen temin edilemeyen tan\u0131k S.A.n\u0131n dinlenmesine ili\u015fkin ara karardan vazge\u00e7ilmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Ancak Mahkemece tan\u0131\u011fa neden ula\u015f\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin bir gerek\u00e7e ortaya konulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi zorla getirilme emrine kar\u015f\u0131n ula\u015f\u0131lamayan tan\u0131k hakk\u0131nda adres ara\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131 yap\u0131lmas\u0131 da istenmemi\u015ftir. Buna g\u00f6re tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n savunman\u0131n da haz\u0131r bulundu\u011fu bir celsede dinlenmemesinin ge\u00e7erli bir nedene dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6ylemek m\u00fcmk\u00fcn g\u00f6z\u00fckmemektedir. Ancak ge\u00e7erli bir neden ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclmemesi, tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011finin kabul edilmesi i\u00e7in yeterli de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n
25. \u0130kinci olarak h\u00fckm\u00fcn tek veya belirleyici \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde ba\u015fvurucunun sorgulama ve\/veya sorgulatma imk\u00e2n\u0131na sahip olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir tan\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan verilen ifadeye dayal\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ortaya \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
26. Somut olayda Mahkeme, ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda tespit edilen d\u00f6rt ayr\u0131 olaydan sadece Olay 4 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ba\u015fvurucunun mahk\u00fbmiyetine karar vermi\u015ftir. H\u00fckm\u00fcn gerek\u00e7esinde tan\u0131k S.A.n\u0131n 16\/11\/2018 tarihinde Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131kta verdi\u011fi, olay tarihinde ba\u015fvurucudan eroin maddesini 50 TL kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda sat\u0131n ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015feklindeki ifadesine ve ba\u015fvurucuyu kollukta te\u015fhis etmesine dayan\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ayr\u0131ca ba\u015fvurucu ile tan\u0131k S.A. aras\u0131ndaki ileti\u015fimin tespiti tutanaklar\u0131na, fiziki takip tutana\u011f\u0131na, kriminal rapora ve ba\u015fvurucunun savunmalar\u0131na vurgu yaparak ba\u015fvurucunun at\u0131l\u0131 uyu\u015fturucu ticareti su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011fi sonucuna varm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. O h\u00e2lde gerek\u00e7eli karara g\u00f6re s\u00f6z konusu di\u011fer deliller, tan\u0131k S.A.n\u0131n beyanlar\u0131 ile tamamlan\u0131r niteliktedir (bkz. \u00a7 15). Bu durumda ba\u015fvurucuya sorgulama\/sorgulatma imk\u00e2n\u0131 verilmeyen tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131na g\u00f6t\u00fcren tek olmasa da belirleyici delil niteli\u011finde oldu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
27. Yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecinde ba\u015fvurucuya, olaylar\u0131 kendi bak\u0131\u015f a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131na g\u00f6re anlatma ve delillerini sunma imk\u00e2n\u0131 tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ancak Mahkemenin tan\u0131k S.A.y\u0131 ba\u015fvurucunun da soru sormas\u0131na imk\u00e2n sa\u011flayacak \u015fekilde istinabe suretiyle ya da SEGB\u0130S gibi vas\u0131talarla dinlemesi i\u00e7in gerekli ve yeterli \u00e7abay\u0131 g\u00f6sterdi\u011fine ili\u015fkin bir bilgi ve belgeye ula\u015f\u0131lamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n soru\u015fturma evresinde verdi\u011fi ifadeler kovu\u015fturma evresinde ba\u015fvurucuya duru\u015fmada okunmu\u015fsa da muhakeme s\u00fcrecinin hi\u00e7bir a\u015famas\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucu bu beyanlara kar\u015f\u0131 itirazlar\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrebilmek i\u00e7in tan\u0131\u011f\u0131 sorgulama imk\u00e2n\u0131 bulamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Di\u011fer bir ifadeyle ba\u015fvurucu, tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n tespiti s\u0131ras\u0131nda haz\u0131r bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ses ve g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc nakli yoluyla da olsa onlar\u0131 sorgulayamam\u0131\u015f; sorulan sorulara verdikleri cevaplar hakk\u0131nda izlenim edinme f\u0131rsat\u0131 elde edememi\u015ftir. Bu y\u00fczden tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n tepkileri konusunda Mahkemenin dikkatini \u00e7ekememi\u015f, b\u00f6ylelikle tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n do\u011frulu\u011fu ve g\u00fcvenilirli\u011fi test edilememi\u015ftir. Mahkeme de tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n sorulara cevap verirken g\u00f6sterece\u011fi tepkilerle ilgili izlenim elde edememi\u015ftir. Sonu\u00e7 olarak do\u011frulu\u011fu ve g\u00fcvenilirli\u011fi test edilmemi\u015f tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n beyanlar\u0131 belirleyici delil olarak h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 h\u00e2lde savunman\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 zorluklar\u0131 telafi edecek kar\u015f\u0131 dengeleyici g\u00fcvenceler sa\u011flanmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu ba\u011flamda tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n duru\u015fmada veya SEGB\u0130S yoluyla dinlenmemesinin bir b\u00fct\u00fcn olarak yarg\u0131laman\u0131n hakkaniyetini zedeledi\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
28. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa’n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
B. Di\u011fer \u0130hlal \u0130ddialar\u0131<\/p>\n
29. Ba\u015fvuruda tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verildi\u011finden, kararda var\u0131lan sonuca ve uygun g\u00f6r\u00fclen giderime g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucunun adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131na ve s\u00fcrece ili\u015fkin di\u011fer \u015fik\u00e2yetleri hakk\u0131nda kabul edilebilirlik ve esas y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ayr\u0131ca bir inceleme yap\u0131lmas\u0131na gerek olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M<\/p>\n
30. Ba\u015fvurucu; ihlalin tespitini, yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131, maddi ve manevi tazminata h\u00fckmedilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
31. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamda karar\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi yarg\u0131 mercilerince yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f; yeniden yarg\u0131lama i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flatmak ve Anayasa Mahkemesini ihlal sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131ran nedenleri gideren, ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere uygun yeni bir karar vermektir (Mehmet Do\u011fan [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n
32. Belirli bir davaya ili\u015fkin olarak delilleri de\u011ferlendirme ve g\u00f6sterilen delilin davayla ilgili olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verme yetkisi kural olarak yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fcten mahkemelere aittir (Orhan K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7 [GK], B. No: 2014\/4704, 1\/2\/2018, \u00a7 44). Bu ba\u011flamda somut olayda ba\u015fvurucunun su\u00e7u i\u015fleyip i\u015flemedi\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde karar vermek Anayasa Mahkemesinin g\u00f6revi de\u011fildir. Anayasa Mahkemesince verilen ihlal karar\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n beraat etti\u011fi anlam\u0131na gelmedi\u011fi gibi ihlal karar\u0131n\u0131n gereklerinin yerine getirilmesi amac\u0131yla yap\u0131lacak yeniden yarg\u0131lama neticesinde san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda mutlaka beraat karar\u0131 verilmesi gerekti\u011fi anlam\u0131na da gelmemektedir. \u0130hlalin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 gidermek \u00fczere gereken i\u015flemler yerine getirildikten sonra yap\u0131lacak de\u011ferlendirmede mahkemenin delillerin takdir bi\u00e7imine g\u00f6re benzer veya farkl\u0131 bir sonuca varmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
33. Ba\u015fvurucunun maddi zarara ili\u015fkin olarak bilgi\/belge sunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucunun maddi tazminat talebinin; ihlalin ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n yeterli giderim sa\u011flayaca\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan da manevi tazminat talebinin reddine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Adli yard\u0131m talebinin KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n
B. 1. Tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
2. Di\u011fer ihlal iddialar\u0131n\u0131n \u0130NCELENMES\u0130NE GEREK OLMADI\u011eINA,<\/p>\n
C. Anayasa’n\u0131n 36. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere Konya 3. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi (E.2019\/179, K. 2019\/553) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. Ba\u015fvurucunun tazminat taleplerinin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
F. 30.000 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinden olu\u015fan yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvurucuya \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
G. \u00d6demenin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
H. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE, 7\/1\/2025 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 7\/1\/2025 tarihli ve 2022\/21689 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 BURAK B\u00dcY\u00dcKBALBEKMEZ BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2022\/21689) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 7\/1\/2025 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Recai AKYEL \u00a0 \u00a0 Selahaddin MENTE\u015e \u00a0 \u00a0 Muhterem \u0130NCE \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : Ay\u00e7a GAN\u0130DA\u011eLI DEM\u0130RC\u0130 Ba\u015fvurucu : Burak B\u00dcY\u00dcKBALBEKMEZ Vekili : Av. Sinan \u00d6ZBEY \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, beyanlar\u0131 belirleyici \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nan tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n duru\u015fmada sorgulanamamas\u0131 nedeniyle tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Konya ilinde narkotik su\u00e7larla m\u00fccadele kapsam\u0131nda yap\u0131lan \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalarda ba\u015fvurucunun uyu\u015fturucu madde ticareti yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususunda bilgiler al\u0131nmas\u0131 \u00fczerine Konya Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) soru\u015fturmaya ba\u015fland\u0131\u011f\u0131, ba\u015fvurucunun kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 telefon \u00fczerinde ileti\u015fimin dinlenmesi ve kayda al\u0131nmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin karar al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu kapsamda yap\u0131lan \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar do\u011frultusunda be\u015f ayr\u0131 olay tespiti yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. 3. Olay 1 kapsam\u0131nda; 25\/5\/2018 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucunun tan\u0131k Ali ile yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesi do\u011frultusunda ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn saat 22.15 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda fiziki takibe ba\u015fland\u0131\u011f\u0131, yap\u0131lan fiziki takipte ba\u015fvurucunun belirlenen adresteki ikametg\u00e2h\u0131 \u00f6n\u00fcnde bir m\u00fcddet bekledikten sonra ikametg\u00e2h\u0131n i\u00e7ine girdi\u011fi vetan\u0131k olarak beyanlar\u0131 al\u0131nan A.G.K.nin ve G.B.nin de s\u00f6z konusu ikametg\u00e2ha girdi\u011fi, k\u0131sa bir s\u00fcre sonra tan\u0131klar\u0131n ikametg\u00e2htan \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, fiziki takibe son verilerek tan\u0131klar A.G.K.nin ve G.B.nin \u00fczerlerinde yap\u0131lan …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-35296","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n