T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
HAYR\u0130 ALTAY BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/38990)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 17\/12\/2024<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Metin KIRATLI<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Mehmet Yavuz YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hayri ALTAY<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Ali Volkan \u00d6ZG\u00dcVEN<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, gazilik \u00fcnvan\u0131 verilmesi talebiyle a\u00e7\u0131lan davada eksik incelemeye istinaden karar verilmesi nedeniyle silahlar\u0131n e\u015fitli\u011fi ve \u00e7eli\u015fmeli yarg\u0131lama ilkelerinin ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
A. Bireysel Ba\u015fvuru \u00d6ncesi S\u00fcre\u00e7<\/p>\n
2. Birinci K\u0131br\u0131s Bar\u0131\u015f Harek\u00e2t\u0131n\u0131n 20-21-22 Temmuz 1974, \u0130kinci Bar\u0131\u015f Harek\u00e2t\u0131n\u0131n da 14-15-16 A\u011fustos 1974 tarihlerinde yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilmekte olup24\/2\/1968 tarihli ve 1005 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130stiklal Madalyas\u0131 Verilmi\u015f Bulunanlara Vatani Hizmet Tertibinden \u015eeref Ayl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Ba\u011flanmas\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun\u2019da de\u011fi\u015fiklik yapan l\/12\/l983 tarihli ve 2943 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun ve onu de\u011fi\u015ftiren 7\/9\/1991 tarihli ve 3761 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’dan yararlanabilmek i\u00e7in bu tarihlerde fiilen K\u0131br\u0131s\u2019ta g\u00f6rev yapm\u0131\u015f olmak gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n
B. Bireysel Ba\u015fvuru S\u00fcreci<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fvurucu; top\u00e7u er olarak 1973 y\u0131l\u0131 Mart ay\u0131 celp d\u00f6neminde askere al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f, 9\/12\/1974 tarihinde terhis olmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
4. Ba\u015fvurucu, askerlik g\u00f6revinde oldu\u011fu s\u00fcre\u00e7te K\u0131br\u0131s Bar\u0131\u015f Harek\u00e2t\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015flamas\u0131 nedeniyle 27\/7\/1974 tarihinde birli\u011fiyle harek\u00e2ta kat\u0131lmak \u00fczere K\u0131br\u0131s’a g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fcklerini veikinci K\u0131br\u0131s Bar\u0131\u015f Harek\u00e2t\u0131 s\u00fcrecinin tamam\u0131nda fiilen K\u0131br\u0131s’ta bulundu\u011funu iddia etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucunun belirtilen iddias\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda taraf\u0131na gazi \u00fcnvan\u0131 verilmesi ve bu \u00e7er\u00e7evede 1005 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun uyar\u0131nca \u015feref ayl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ba\u011flanmas\u0131 talebiyle 7\/9\/2018 tarihinde Mill\u00ee Savunma Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na (\u0130dare) yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ba\u015fvurusu 21\/11\/2018 tarihli i\u015flemle reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. Ba\u015fvurucu taraf\u0131ndan, belirtilen ret i\u015fleminin iptali talebiyle Ankara 1. \u0130dare Mahkemesinde (Mahkeme) dava a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu dava dilek\u00e7esinde, top\u00e7u er olarak 6. Kolordu Top\u00e7u Alay\u0131 Karma \u00d6l\u00e7me B\u00f6l\u00fck Komutanl\u0131\u011f\u0131nda 1973\/Mart celp d\u00f6neminde askere al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, askerli\u011fini yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u0131rada K\u0131br\u0131s Bar\u0131\u015f Harek\u00e2t\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ikinci K\u0131br\u0131s Bar\u0131\u015f Harek\u00e2t\u0131nda (14-15-16 A\u011fustos 1974) fiilen K\u0131br\u0131s’ta bulundu\u011funu, b\u00f6l\u00fck komutan\u0131 B.K.n\u0131n muharip gazi oldu\u011funu, komutan\u0131n muharip gazi say\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 yerde birli\u011finin de muharip gazi olaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Ba\u015fvurucu, ayr\u0131ca iddialar\u0131n\u0131n do\u011frulu\u011funun ortaya konulabilmesi i\u00e7in Mahkemeden 2. Ordu Komutanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 27 Temmuz 1974 tarihli emri ile olu\u015fturulan \u00f6zel g\u00f6rev kuvveti emrinin, o tarihlerde K\u0131br\u0131s’a \u00e7\u0131kan birlikleri g\u00f6steren harek\u00e2t ceridesinin, K\u0131br\u0131s’a 6. Kolordu 106. Top Alay\u0131n\u0131n karma \u00f6l\u00e7me birli\u011finin \u00e7\u0131k\u0131p \u00e7\u0131kmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ve son olarak k\u00fcnye defterinin ilgili birliklerden istenmesini talep etmi\u015ftir. Mahkeme 1\/11\/2019 tarihli karar\u0131yla davan\u0131n reddine h\u00fckmetmi\u015ftir. Karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinin ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
” Olayda, davac\u0131n\u0131n 1973\/Mart celp d\u00f6neminde askere al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve 09 Aral\u0131k 1974 tarihinde Kar.\u00d6l\u00e7.Bl.K.l\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan (K\u0131br\u0131s) terhis oldu\u011fu, 1’inci ve 2’nci K\u0131br\u0131s Bar\u0131\u015f Harekat\u0131n\u0131n bu tarihler aras\u0131nda ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011fi, ancak davac\u0131n\u0131n birinci harekat\u0131n yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 20, 21, 22 Temmuz 1974 tarihlerinde veya ikinci harekat\u0131n yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 14, 15, 16 A\u011fustos 1974 tarihlerinde K\u0131br\u0131s\u2019ta fiilen g\u00f6rev yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin bir delil ya da belge olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, K\u0131br\u0131s Bar\u0131\u015f Harekat\u0131na kat\u0131lan personel listesinde, KTBK K.l\u0131\u011f\u0131 kay\u0131tlar\u0131nda, Y\u00fcre\u011fir As.\u015e.B\u015fk.L\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan temin edilen k\u00fcnye defterinde, terhis belgesinde ve di\u011fer kay\u0131tlarda davac\u0131n\u0131n K\u0131br\u0131s Bar\u0131\u015f Harekat\u0131na kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair bir kayd\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, K\u0131br\u0131s Bar\u0131\u015f Harek\u00e2t\u0131na kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin belge ve bilgi bulunmayan davac\u0131ya K\u0131br\u0131s Bar\u0131\u015f Harekat\u0131 Gazisi unvan\u0131 verilmesi talebiyle yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun reddine dair dava konusu i\u015flemde hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonu\u00e7 ve kanatine var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.”<\/p>\n
7. Bu karara kar\u015f\u0131 ba\u015fvurucu taraf\u0131ndan sunulan istinaf dilek\u00e7esinde; Mahkemece yeterli ara\u015ft\u0131rma yap\u0131lmadan yaln\u0131zca idarenin cevaplar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda karar verildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na yer verilmi\u015ftir. \u0130stinaf ba\u015fvurusunu inceleyen Ankara B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesi 10. \u0130dari Dava Dairesinin (Daire) 28\/4\/2021 tarihli karar\u0131yla, ba\u015fvurucunun iddialar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik bir gerek\u00e7eye yer verilmeksizin istinaf isteminin kesin olarak reddine h\u00fckmedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. Karar 9\/7\/2021 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucuya tebli\u011f edilmi\u015f, ba\u015fvurucu 9\/8\/2021 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
10. Ba\u015fvuru belgelerinin bir \u00f6rne\u011fi bilgi i\u00e7in Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6nderilmi\u015ftir. Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc bildirmi\u015f, ba\u015fvurucu da Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 s\u00fcresinde beyanda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
11. Ba\u015fvurucu; top\u00e7u er olarak askerli\u011fini yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u0131rada K\u0131br\u0131s Bar\u0131\u015f Harek\u00e2t\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ikinci K\u0131br\u0131s Bar\u0131\u015f Harek\u00e2t\u0131nda (14-15-16 A\u011fustos 1974) fiilen K\u0131br\u0131s’ta bulundu\u011funu, b\u00f6l\u00fck komutan\u0131 B.K.n\u0131n muharip gazi oldu\u011funu, kendisinin de ayn\u0131 b\u00f6l\u00fckte bulundu\u011funu belirtmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, bu hususu ispatlayan bilgi ve belgelerin \u0130darenin ve ilgili asker\u00ee birliklerin ar\u015fivlerinde mevcut olmas\u0131na ve talep etmesine ra\u011fmen Mahkemece bu hususa y\u00f6nelik herhangi bir ara\u015ft\u0131rma yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve Mahkemenin gerek\u00e7esini \u0130dareden gelen bilgiye g\u00f6re olu\u015fturdu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrerek adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
12. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f yaz\u0131s\u0131nda, \u0130dare Mahkemesi ve B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucunun itirazlar\u0131 dikkate al\u0131narak, ilgili mevzuat uyar\u0131nca ba\u015fvurucunun talebi incelenmi\u015f ve ba\u015fvurucunun K\u0131br\u0131s Bar\u0131\u015f Harek\u00e2t\u0131na kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin belge ve bilgi bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve bu nedenle K\u0131br\u0131s Bar\u0131\u015f Harek\u00e2t\u0131 Gazisi \u00fcnvan\u0131 verilmesi talebiyle yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun reddine dair dava konusu i\u015flemde hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir. Bakanl\u0131k ayr\u0131ca Anayasa Mahkemesinin kanun yolu \u015fik\u00e2yeti niteli\u011findeki ba\u015fvurularda bariz takdir hatas\u0131 veya a\u00e7\u0131k keyf\u00eelik bulunmad\u0131k\u00e7a bireysel ba\u015fvuru yolunda inceleme yap\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin kararlar\u0131n\u0131 hat\u0131rlatm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu, Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyan\u0131nda ba\u015fvuru formundaki iddialar\u0131n\u0131 tekrarlam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. <\/p>\n
13. Anayasa Mahkemesi, olaylar\u0131n ba\u015fvurucu taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan hukuki nitelendirmesi ile ba\u011fl\u0131 olmay\u0131p olay ve olgular\u0131n hukuki tavsifini kendisi takdir eder. Ba\u015fvurucu -esas olarak- mahkeme karar\u0131nda idarenin sunmu\u015f oldu\u011fu o tarihte K\u0131br\u0131s’ta g\u00f6rev yapanlara ili\u015fkinsadece r\u00fctbeli komutanlar\u0131n isimlerinin bulundu\u011fubelgeye itibar etmek suretiyledavas\u0131n\u0131n reddedildi\u011fini, iddia ve itirazlar\u0131n\u0131 gere\u011fi gibi sunma imk\u00e2n\u0131ndan yoksun b\u0131rak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve ispat k\u00fclfeti noktas\u0131nda dezavantajl\u0131 konumda oldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden ba\u015fvuru, adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki silahlar\u0131n e\u015fitli\u011fi ve \u00e7eli\u015fmeli yarg\u0131lama ilkeleri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
14. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan iddian\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
15. Anayasa’n\u0131n 36. maddesi uyar\u0131nca herkes iddia, savunma ve adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131na sahiptir. Anayasa’n\u0131n an\u0131lan maddesinde adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131ndan ayr\u0131 olarak iddia ve savunma hakk\u0131na birlikte yer verilmesi, taraflara iddia ve savunmalar\u0131n\u0131 mahkeme \u00f6n\u00fcnde dile getirme f\u0131rsat\u0131 tan\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi anlam\u0131n\u0131 da i\u00e7ermektedir (Mehmet Fidan, B. No: 2014\/14673, 20\/9\/2017, \u00a7 37).<\/p>\n
16. Anayasa’n\u0131n 36. maddesine “adil yarg\u0131lanma” ibaresinin eklenmesine ili\u015fkin gerek\u00e7ede, T\u00fcrkiye’nin taraf\u0131 oldu\u011fu uluslararas\u0131 s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerle de g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lama hakk\u0131n\u0131n madde metnine d\u00e2hil edildi\u011fi vurgulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Nitekim Anayasa Mahkemesi de Anayasa’n\u0131n 36. maddesi uyar\u0131nca inceleme yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir\u00e7ok karar\u0131nda, Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesi i\u00e7tihad\u0131yla adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n kapsam\u0131na d\u00e2hil edilen silahlar\u0131n e\u015fitli\u011fi ve \u00e7eli\u015fmeli yarg\u0131lama ilkelerine Anayasa’n\u0131n 36. maddesi kapsam\u0131nda yer vermektedir. Bu itibarla an\u0131lan ilkenin adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n kapsam ve i\u00e7eri\u011fine d\u00e2hil oldu\u011fu sonucu ortaya \u00e7\u0131kmaktad\u0131r. An\u0131lan ilkeye uygun y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmeyen bir yarg\u0131laman\u0131n hakkaniyete uygun olmas\u0131 imk\u00e2n d\u00e2hilinde de\u011fildir (Mehmet Fidan, \u00a7 38).<\/p>\n
17. Silahlar\u0131n e\u015fitli\u011fi ilkesi, davan\u0131n taraflar\u0131n\u0131n usule ili\u015fkin haklar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ayn\u0131 ko\u015fullara tabi tutulmas\u0131 ve taraflardan birinin di\u011ferine g\u00f6re daha zay\u0131f bir duruma d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fclmeksizin iddia ve savunmalar\u0131n\u0131 makul bir \u015fekilde mahkeme \u00f6n\u00fcnde dile getirme f\u0131rsat\u0131na sahip olmas\u0131 anlam\u0131na gelir (Ya\u015fas\u0131n Aslan, B. No: 2013\/1134, 16\/5\/2013, \u00a7 32). Bu usul g\u00fcvencesi uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n her iki taraf\u0131na da savunmas\u0131n\u0131n temel dayana\u011f\u0131 olan delilleri sunma imk\u00e2n\u0131 tan\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131 kapsamaktad\u0131r. Silahlar\u0131n e\u015fitli\u011fi ilkesi kapsam\u0131nda yap\u0131lacak inceleme, ba\u015fvuru konusu yarg\u0131laman\u0131n bir b\u00fct\u00fcn olarak adil olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesidir (Y\u00fcksel Han\u00e7er, B. No: 2013\/2116, 23\/1\/2014, \u00a7 18, 19).<\/p>\n
18. Kural olarak Anayasa Mahkemesinin g\u00f6revi herhangi bir davada bilirki\u015fi raporu veya uzman m\u00fctalaas\u0131n\u0131n gerekli olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar vermek de\u011fildir. Bununla birlikte Anayasa Mahkemesi taraflar\u0131n \u00f6ne s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve esasa etkili olan iddialar\u0131n i\u015fin mahiyetinin gerektirdi\u011fi \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde incelenip incelenmedi\u011fini ve \u00f6zellikle ispat k\u00fclfeti konusunda taraflardan birinin di\u011ferine nazaran dezavantajl\u0131 bir konuma d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fclmedi\u011fini denetleme g\u00f6revi bulunmaktad\u0131r (Ahmet Korkmaz, B. No: 2014\/16232, 25\/1\/2018, \u00a7 29).<\/p>\n
19. Ba\u015fvurucu; uzun y\u0131llar sonra terhis belgesini idarenin ar\u015fiv kay\u0131tlar\u0131ndan \u00e7\u0131kartt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, belgenin Karma \u00d6l\u00e7me Birli\u011fi Komutanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Top\u00e7 \u00dcste\u011fmen B.K. taraf\u0131ndan dolduruldu\u011funu, Top\u00e7u K\u0131demli Albay \u015e.E taraf\u0131ndan onayland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, 39. Top. Alay Komutanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n K\u0131br\u0131s \u00c7aml\u0131bel’de konumland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, karma \u00f6l\u00e7me b\u00f6l\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn de K\u0131br\u0131s G\u00fczelyurt il\u00e7esi Serhatk\u00f6y’de oldu\u011funu iddia etmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu ayr\u0131ca bu belgenin kendisinin K\u0131br\u0131s’tan terhis oldu\u011funun, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla orada g\u00f6rev yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n delili oldu\u011funuileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015f s\u00f6z konusu belgeyi d\u00fczenleyen komutan\u0131 B.K ile \u00f6zel kuvvet birimi olarak K\u0131br\u0131s’a gittiklerini, hatta Komutan\u0131 B.K.ya vatan hizmet tertibinden \u015feref ayl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ba\u011fland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015ftir. Bu durumun aksi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde bir tespitin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun iddias\u0131n\u0131n temelsiz oldu\u011fu s\u00f6ylenemez.<\/p>\n
20. Davan\u0131n esas\u0131na m\u00fcteallik iddialar\u0131n uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcme kavu\u015fturulmas\u0131 ad\u0131na yeterli \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde irdelenip irdelenmedi\u011fi ve bu kapsamda taraflardan birinin di\u011ferine nazaran dezavantajl\u0131 bir konuma getirilip getirilmedi\u011fi denetime a\u00e7\u0131k hususlard\u0131r (Y\u0131lmaz \u00d6zcan, B. No: 2015\/12914, 15\/11\/2018, \u00a7 38).<\/p>\n
21. Somut olayda ba\u015fvurucu 17\/1\/2019 tarihli dava dilek\u00e7esinde; ikinci K\u0131br\u0131s Bar\u0131\u015f Harek\u00e2t\u0131nda (14-15-16 A\u011fustos 1974) fiilen K\u0131br\u0131s’ta bulundu\u011funu, b\u00f6l\u00fck komutan\u0131 B.K.n\u0131n muharip gazi oldu\u011funu, kendisinin de ayn\u0131 b\u00f6l\u00fckte bulundu\u011funu belirterek bu hususu ispatlayan bilgi ve belgelerin \u0130darenin ve ilgili asker\u00ee birliklerin ar\u015fivlerinde mevcut oldu\u011funu Mahkemeye \u00f6zellikle belirtti\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Ba\u015fvurucu, bu kapsamda Mahkemeden 2.Ordu Komutanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 27 Temmuz 1974 tarihli emri ile olu\u015fturulan \u00f6zel g\u00f6rev kuvveti emrinin, o tarihlerde K\u0131br\u0131s’a \u00e7\u0131kan birlikleri g\u00f6steren harek\u00e2t ceridesinin, K\u0131br\u0131s’a 6. Kolordu 106. Top Alay\u0131n\u0131n karma \u00f6l\u00e7me birli\u011finin \u00e7\u0131k\u0131p \u00e7\u0131kmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ve k\u00fcnye defterinin ilgili birimlerden istenmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
22. Mahkeme 1\/11\/2019 tarihli gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun \u00f6ne s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc hususlara ili\u015fkin olarak herhangi bir ara\u015ft\u0131rma yapmadan \u0130darenin savunmas\u0131nda belirtti\u011fi h\u00e2liyle ba\u015fvurucunun birinci harek\u00e2t\u0131n yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 20, 21, 22 Temmuz 1974 tarihlerinde veya ikinci harek\u00e2t\u0131n yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 14, 15, 16 A\u011fustos 1974 tarihlerinde K\u0131br\u0131s\u2019ta fiilen g\u00f6rev yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin bir delil ya da belge olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul\u00fcnden hareketle davan\u0131n reddine h\u00fckmetmi\u015ftir. <\/p>\n
23. \u00d6ncelikle askerlik vazifesini yerine getirmi\u015f olan ki\u015filerin sevk ve terhis belgelerinin idarenin kay\u0131tlar\u0131nda \u00e7eli\u015fkiye mahal b\u0131rakmayacak \u015fekilde tutulmas\u0131 vebu bilgilere dayal\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilecek i\u015flemlerde esas al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi, s\u00f6z konusu bilgi ve belgelerin temininin ve muhafaza edilmesinin idarenin sorumlulu\u011funda oldu\u011fu, idarenin elinde bilgi ve belge bulunmamas\u0131 yahut bulunan bilgi ve belgelerin birbiriyle \u00e7eli\u015fmesi h\u00e2linde sorumlulu\u011fun asker\u00ee vazifesini yerine getiren ki\u015filere y\u00fckletilemeyece\u011fi hususu tart\u0131\u015fmas\u0131zd\u0131r.<\/p>\n
24. Bununla birlikte ba\u015fvurucu K\u0131br\u0131s Bar\u0131\u015f Harek\u00e2t\u0131’n\u0131n oldu\u011fu d\u00f6nemde g\u00f6revli olarak K\u0131br\u0131s’ta bulundu\u011funa ili\u015fkin birtak\u0131m belgeler sunmu\u015f ve bu hususa ili\u015fkin belgelerin ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 ve getirtilmesini Mahkemeden istemi\u015ftir. Ancak Mahkeme ba\u015fvurucunun sunmu\u015f oldu\u011fu belgeleri de de\u011ferlendirmedi\u011fi gibi toplat\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etti\u011fi belgeleri de ilgili kurumlardan istememi\u015ftir. Sonu\u00e7 olarak ancak Mahkeme yard\u0131m\u0131yla toplanabilecek deliller toplanmayarak ba\u015fvurucunun daval\u0131 idareye nazaran zay\u0131f bir konuma d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve bu durumun silahlar\u0131n e\u015fitli\u011fi ve \u00e7eli\u015fmeli yarg\u0131lama ilkelerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
25. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa’n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki silahlar\u0131n e\u015fitli\u011fi ve \u00e7eli\u015fmeli yarg\u0131lama ilkelerinin ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M<\/p>\n
26. Ba\u015fvurucu, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n yenilenmesi ile 2.000.000 TL maddi ve 500.000 TL manevi tazminata karar verilmesi talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
27. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamda karar\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi mahkemece yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden yarg\u0131lama i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flatmak ve Anayasa Mahkemesini ihlal sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131ran nedenleri gideren, ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere uygun yeni bir karar vermektir (Mehmet Do\u011fan [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n
28. \u0130hlalin ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n yeterli bir giderim sa\u011flayaca\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan tazminat talebinin reddine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Silahlar\u0131n e\u015fitli\u011fi ve \u00e7eli\u015fmeli yarg\u0131lama ilkelerinin ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. Anayasa’n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki silahlar\u0131n e\u015fitli\u011fi ve \u00e7eli\u015fmeli yarg\u0131lama ilkelerinin \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
C. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin silahlar\u0131n e\u015fitli\u011fi ve \u00e7eli\u015fmeli yarg\u0131lama ilkelerinin ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla Ankara 1.\u0130dare Mahkemesine (E.2019\/346, K.2019\/2035) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. Ba\u015fvurucunun tazminat taleplerinin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. 487,60 TL har\u00e7 ve 30.000 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinden olu\u015fan toplam 30.487,60 TL yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvurucuya \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
F. \u00d6demelerin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
G. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 17\/12\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 17\/12\/2024 tarihli ve 2021\/38990 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 HAYR\u0130 ALTAY BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/38990) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 17\/12\/2024 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM \u00a0 \u00a0 Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Metin KIRATLI Raport\u00f6r : Mehmet Yavuz YA\u015eAR Ba\u015fvurucu : Hayri ALTAY Vekili : Av. Ali Volkan \u00d6ZG\u00dcVEN \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, gazilik \u00fcnvan\u0131 verilmesi talebiyle a\u00e7\u0131lan davada eksik incelemeye istinaden karar verilmesi nedeniyle silahlar\u0131n e\u015fitli\u011fi ve \u00e7eli\u015fmeli yarg\u0131lama ilkelerinin ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. A. Bireysel Ba\u015fvuru \u00d6ncesi S\u00fcre\u00e7 2. Birinci K\u0131br\u0131s Bar\u0131\u015f Harek\u00e2t\u0131n\u0131n 20-21-22 Temmuz 1974, \u0130kinci Bar\u0131\u015f Harek\u00e2t\u0131n\u0131n da 14-15-16 A\u011fustos 1974 tarihlerinde yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilmekte olup24\/2\/1968 tarihli ve 1005 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130stiklal Madalyas\u0131 Verilmi\u015f Bulunanlara Vatani Hizmet Tertibinden \u015eeref Ayl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Ba\u011flanmas\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun\u2019da de\u011fi\u015fiklik yapan l\/12\/l983 tarihli ve 2943 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun ve onu de\u011fi\u015ftiren 7\/9\/1991 tarihli ve 3761 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’dan yararlanabilmek i\u00e7in bu tarihlerde fiilen K\u0131br\u0131s\u2019ta g\u00f6rev yapm\u0131\u015f olmak gerekmektedir. B. Bireysel Ba\u015fvuru S\u00fcreci 3. Ba\u015fvurucu; top\u00e7u er olarak 1973 y\u0131l\u0131 Mart ay\u0131 celp d\u00f6neminde askere al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f, 9\/12\/1974 tarihinde terhis olmu\u015ftur. 4. Ba\u015fvurucu, askerlik g\u00f6revinde oldu\u011fu s\u00fcre\u00e7te K\u0131br\u0131s Bar\u0131\u015f Harek\u00e2t\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015flamas\u0131 nedeniyle 27\/7\/1974 tarihinde birli\u011fiyle harek\u00e2ta kat\u0131lmak \u00fczere K\u0131br\u0131s’a g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fcklerini veikinci …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-34990","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n