T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130BRAH\u0130M YA\u011eIZ BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/31562)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 17\/12\/2024<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Metin KIRATLI<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Muhammed Cemil KANDEM\u0130R<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
\u0130brahim YA\u011eIZ<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, disiplin cezas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 infaz h\u00e2kimli\u011fine yap\u0131lan \u015fik\u00e2yette yarg\u0131sal mercilerce s\u00f6zl\u00fc savunma al\u0131nmadan karar verilmesi nedeniyle adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir<\/p>\n
2. Bireysel ba\u015fvurunun yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarih itibar\u0131yla, K\u0131r\u0131kkale F Tipi Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumunda (\u0130nfaz Kurumu) aralar\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun da bulundu\u011fu 76 mahpus hakk\u0131nda 15\/6\/2020 tarihinde sabah da\u011f\u0131t\u0131lan ia\u015felerini ald\u0131klar\u0131 fakat \u00f6\u011flen ve ak\u015fam ia\u015felerini almad\u0131klar\u0131ndan bahisle Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumu Disiplin Kurulu Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan (Disiplin Kurulu) 16\/6\/2020 tarihinde disiplin soru\u015fturmas\u0131 ba\u015flat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. \u0130nfaz Kurumunun g\u00f6revlendirdi\u011fi soru\u015fturmac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan disiplin soru\u015fturmas\u0131 raporu 30\/6\/2020 tarihinde Disiplin Kuruluna sunulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
4. Disiplin Kurulu taraf\u0131ndan 1\/7\/2020 tarihinde aralar\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun da oldu\u011fu mahpuslar hakk\u0131nda 13\/12\/2004 tarihli ve 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza ve G\u00fcvenlik Tedbirlerinin \u0130nfaz\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 42. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (a) bendinde d\u00fczenlenen “Protesto amac\u0131yla idarece verilen yeme\u011fi topluca almama eylemine kat\u0131lmak” fiilini i\u015fledikleri kabul edilerek bu ki\u015filerin “Bir ay ziyaret\u00e7i kabul\u00fcnden yoksun b\u0131rakma ” disiplin cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmalar\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucu an\u0131lan disiplin cezas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 K\u0131r\u0131kkale \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine (\u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi) 17\/7\/2020 tarihli dilek\u00e7eyle \u015fik\u00e2yet ba\u015fvurusunda bulunmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fvurucu, mahkemede yapaca\u011f\u0131 savunma esnas\u0131nda K\u00fcrt\u00e7e veya Yunanca terc\u00fcman bulundurulmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu ve di\u011fer mahpuslar\u0131n talebini dosya \u00fczerinden de\u011ferlendiren \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi 29\/7\/2020 tarihli karar\u0131yla itiraz\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar vermi\u015ftir. Karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinin ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“…\u00f6\u011flen ve ak\u015fam ia\u015felerini almad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 nedenle 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 kanunun 42\/2-a bendi (protesto amac\u0131yla idarece verilen yeme\u011fi topluca almamak) kapsam\u0131nda disiplin cezas\u0131 verilmi\u015f ise de; disiplin cezas\u0131na konu eylemin 15\/06\/2020 tarihinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi, soru\u015fturman\u0131n 16\/06\/2020 tarihinde ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131, olaya ili\u015fkin muhakkik raporunun ise 30\/06\/2020 tarihinde yaz\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olup, “5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 47\/2-3-4-5. madde ve bentlerinde yer alan “(2) H\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fclerin di\u011fer disiplin cezalar\u0131n\u0131 gerektiren eylemlerinin \u00f6\u011frenilmesinden itibaren derhal ve en ge\u00e7 iki g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde kurum en \u00fcst amirince atanan bir g\u00f6revli taraf\u0131ndan soru\u015fturmaya ba\u015flan\u0131r. (3) Soru\u015fturma en ge\u00e7 yedi g\u00fcn i\u00e7erisinde tamamlan\u0131r ve d\u00fczenlenen rapor ve ekleri disiplin kuruluna sunulur. Soru\u015fturma s\u00fcresi eylemin ve soru\u015fturman\u0131n niteli\u011fine g\u00f6re infaz hakiminin yaz\u0131l\u0131 onay\u0131 ile yedi g\u00fcne kadar uzat\u0131labilir. (4) Savunma al\u0131nmadan disiplin cezas\u0131 verilemez. Haklar\u0131nda disiplin soru\u015fturmas\u0131 yap\u0131lanlara, y\u00fcklenen eylemin niteli\u011fi ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131 ile \u00fc\u00e7 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde savunmalar\u0131n\u0131 vermeleri, aksi halde bu haklar\u0131ndan vazge\u00e7mi\u015f say\u0131lacaklar\u0131 yaz\u0131l\u0131 olarak bildirilir. Savunma yaz\u0131l\u0131 olarak sunulabilece\u011fi gibi s\u00f6zl\u00fc olarak da yap\u0131labilir. S\u00f6zl\u00fc savunma tutanakla saptan\u0131r. T\u00fcrk\u00e7e bilmeyenlerle, sa\u011f\u0131r ve dilsizlerin savunmalar\u0131 terc\u00fcman arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla al\u0131n\u0131r. (5) Disiplin cezalar\u0131 disiplin kurulunca evrak \u00fczerinden g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fclerek en ge\u00e7 \u00fc\u00e7 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde karara ba\u011flan\u0131r. Disiplin kurulu, yasada yaz\u0131l\u0131 disiplin cezas\u0131 uygulanmas\u0131na veya disiplin cezas\u0131 verilmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verebilir. Disiplin kurulu kararlar\u0131 gerek\u00e7eli olarak yaz\u0131l\u0131r ve kararda \u015fikayet mercii ve s\u00fcresi a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a g\u00f6sterilir.” maddelerinde belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere disiplin cezas\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcresinde tesis edilmedi\u011fi, 15\/06\/2020 tarihinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen olaya ili\u015fkin soru\u015fturmaya 16\/06\/2020 tarihinde ba\u015fland\u0131\u011f\u0131, muhakkik raporunun ise 30\/06\/2020 tarihinde d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi, bu nedenle kanunda belirtilen s\u00fcrenin a\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcler hakk\u0131nda verilen disiplin cezas\u0131n\u0131n usul y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu ..”<\/p>\n
6. An\u0131lan karara kar\u015f\u0131 Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan itiraz edilmi\u015ftir. Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 itiraz dilek\u00e7esinde 16\/6\/2020 tarihinde ba\u015flanan disiplin soru\u015fturmas\u0131n\u0131n yasal s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde, 30\/6\/2020 tarihinde tamamland\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6zetilmeden h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fclerin itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesinin usul ve kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu belirtmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. \u0130tiraz\u0131 de\u011ferlendiren K\u0131r\u0131kkale 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi (A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi), 19\/8\/2020 tarihinde Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n itiraz\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fcne, \u015fik\u00e2yete konu \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ve disiplin cezalar\u0131n\u0131n onanmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. Karar\u0131n 9\/9\/2020 tarihinde tebli\u011f edilmesi \u00fczerine ba\u015fvurucu 23\/9\/2020 tarihinde Anayasa Mahkemesi bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
10. Ba\u015fvurucu, bireysel ba\u015fvuru har\u00e7 ve masraflar\u0131n\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lama imk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek adli yard\u0131m talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
11. Anayasa Mahkemesinin Mehmet \u015eerif Ay (B. No: 2012\/1181, 17\/9\/2013) karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkeler dikkate al\u0131narak, ge\u00e7imini \u00f6nemli \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde zor duruma d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrmeksizin yarg\u0131lama giderlerini \u00f6deme g\u00fcc\u00fcnden yoksun oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurucunun adli yard\u0131m talebinin kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
12. Ba\u015fvurucu; soru\u015fturman\u0131n hi\u00e7bir evresinde ifadesinin al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu durumun hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu, kendisine verilen disiplin cezas\u0131na dayanak te\u015fkil eden mevzuatta de\u011fi\u015fiklik yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, s\u00f6z konusu de\u011fi\u015fikliklerin 1\/9\/2020 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmesi gerekti\u011fi h\u00e2lde derh\u00e2l uyguland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, disiplin cezas\u0131n\u0131n yasal s\u00fcreler ge\u00e7mesine ra\u011fmen verildi\u011fini belirterek savunma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ve adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Ba\u015fvurucu ayr\u0131ca m\u00fcebbet hapis cezas\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcs\u00fc oldu\u011fundan ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 cezan\u0131n kendisine h\u00fccre cezas\u0131 olarak uygulanaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve ik\u00e2metg\u00e2h\u0131na yak\u0131n bir ceza infaz kurumuna nakil hakk\u0131n\u0131n elinden al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia etmektedir.<\/p>\n
13. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde, \u015fik\u00e2yet ba\u015fvurusu a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n niteli\u011fi itibar\u0131yla S\u00f6zle\u015fme’nin 6. maddesi anlam\u0131nda su\u00e7 isnad\u0131 veya medeni hak ve y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckler kapsam\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fcl\u00fcp g\u00f6r\u00fclemeyece\u011fi hususunun \u00f6ncelikle de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011fi belirtilmi\u015f ve disiplin soru\u015fturmas\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcresi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fin \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011finin kurulu\u015f, g\u00f6rev, yetki ve i\u015fleyi\u015fine ili\u015fkin d\u00fczenlemeler kapsam\u0131nda olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususunun belirlenmesinin gerekti\u011fi bildirilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
14. Somut olayda ba\u015fvurucunun ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 disiplin cezas\u0131n\u0131n infaz\u0131n\u0131n bir ay s\u00fcreyle ziyaret\u00e7i kabul\u00fcnden yoksun b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131 sonucunu do\u011furaca\u011f\u0131ndan buna y\u00f6nelik \u015fik\u00e2yetin medeni hak ve y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerle ilgili uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k kapsam\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilmelidir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla somut olayda Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 36. maddesinin g\u00fcvencelerinin uygulanmas\u0131 gerekir (Benzer de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7in bkz. Talet \u015eanl\u0131 [GK] B. No: 2017\/20526, 17\/1\/2023, \u00a7 46).<\/p>\n
15. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
16. Ba\u015fvurucunun iddialar\u0131 adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki s\u00f6zl\u00fc yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
17. Anayasa Mahkemesi, somut ba\u015fvuru ile benzer nitelikteki ihlal iddialar\u0131n\u0131 Talet \u015eanl\u0131 karar\u0131nda incelemi\u015ftir. An\u0131lan kararda 16\/5\/2001 tarihli ve 4675 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi Kanunu\u2019nun 6. maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda \u201cDisiplin cezas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131lan \u015fik\u00e2yet \u00fczerine infaz h\u00e2kimi, h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc veya tutuklunun savunmas\u0131n\u0131 ald\u0131ktan ve talep edilen di\u011fer delilleri toplay\u0131p de\u011ferlendirdikten sonra karar\u0131n\u0131 verir. H\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc veya tutuklu, savunmas\u0131n\u0131, haz\u0131r bulunmak ve vekaletnamesini ibraz etmek ko\u015fuluyla avukat\u0131yla birlikte veya avukat\u0131 arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla yapabilir. \u0130nfaz h\u00e2kimi gerekli g\u00f6rmesi durumunda h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc veya tutuklunun savunmas\u0131n\u0131 ceza infaz kurumunda da alabilir.\u201d h\u00fckm\u00fcne yer verildi\u011fi belirtilmi\u015f, s\u00f6z konusu h\u00fckm\u00fcn esas olarak disiplin cezalar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik \u015fik\u00e2yetlerin karara ba\u011flanmas\u0131ndan \u00f6nce ilgilinin savunmas\u0131n\u0131n infaz h\u00e2kimi taraf\u0131ndan dinlenmesini ve talep edilen di\u011fer delillerin toplan\u0131p de\u011ferlendirilmesini gerektirdi\u011fi ifade edilmi\u015ftir. H\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc ya da tutuklunun mahkeme huzurunda bulunmas\u0131n\u0131n usul hukuku ba\u011flam\u0131nda duru\u015fma veya farkl\u0131 y\u00f6ntemlerle sa\u011flanabilece\u011fine, nitekim an\u0131lan Kanun\u2019da infaz h\u00e2kiminin s\u00f6z konusu savunmay\u0131 duru\u015fma a\u00e7mak suretiyle ya da duru\u015fma yapmaks\u0131z\u0131n odas\u0131nda veya duru\u015fma salonunda yahut ceza infaz kurumunda almas\u0131na imk\u00e2n tan\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131na i\u015faret edilen kararda, Kanun\u2019da \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen s\u00f6z konusu usuldeki temel amac\u0131n disiplin yapt\u0131r\u0131m\u0131 uygulanan h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc ya da tutuklunun h\u00e2kim kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda meram\u0131n\u0131 anlatabilmesini, dosyada aleyhine olan delillere etkili bir \u015fekilde kar\u015f\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kabilmesini sa\u011flamak oldu\u011fu vurgulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu tespit ve de\u011ferlendirmeler \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda kararda; 4675 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 6. maddesinde disiplin cezalar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131lan \u015fik\u00e2yette ba\u015fvurucuya, savunmas\u0131n\u0131 h\u00e2kim \u00f6n\u00fcnde bizzat haz\u0131r bulunmak suretiyle veya avukat\u0131 arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla dile getirme imk\u00e2n\u0131 tan\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 h\u00e2lde \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011finin ba\u015fvurucunun bu y\u00f6ndeki talebini dikkate almaks\u0131z\u0131n \u015fik\u00e2yetin esas\u0131n\u0131 dosya \u00fczerinden de\u011ferlendirerek karara ba\u011flamas\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvurucunun s\u00f6zl\u00fc yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131na yap\u0131lan m\u00fcdahaleyi kanunilik unsurundan yoksun b\u0131rakt\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilerek ba\u015fvurucunun Anayasa’n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki s\u00f6zl\u00fc yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (Talet \u015eanl\u0131, \u00a7\u00a7 48-69).<\/p>\n
18. Somut olayda, \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k konusu disiplin cezas\u0131n\u0131n esas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik herhangi bir de\u011ferlendirme yapmam\u0131\u015f, usuli bir sebeple an\u0131lan cezan\u0131n iptaline karar vermi\u015ftir. Bu iptal karar\u0131na Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n itiraz\u0131 \u00fczerine A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesincede herhangi bir gerek\u00e7eye yer verilmeksizin \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011finin karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131larak disiplin cezas\u0131n\u0131n onanmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir. Bu yarg\u0131sal s\u00fcre\u00e7ler i\u00e7erisinde ise ba\u015fvurucunun, disiplin cezas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 s\u00f6zl\u00fc beyanda bulunma talebini a\u00e7\u0131k ve net \u015fekilde yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecinde dile getirdi\u011fi h\u00e2lde itirazla ilgili s\u00f6zl\u00fc beyanda bulunma imk\u00e2n\u0131 tan\u0131nmadan, sadece soru\u015fturmaya esas tutanak i\u00e7eri\u011fine dayan\u0131lmak suretiyle karar verildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
19. Somut ba\u015fvuruda, ba\u015fvurucunun yarg\u0131sal makamlar \u00f6n\u00fcnde s\u00f6zl\u00fc olarak savunma yapmak istedi\u011fine dair talebi de bulunmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen bu hakk\u0131n ba\u015fvurucuyasa\u011flanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden Talet \u015eanl\u0131 karar\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerden ve ula\u015f\u0131lan sonu\u00e7tan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren bir durum bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
20. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurucunun Anayasa’n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki s\u00f6zl\u00fc yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
21. Adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki s\u00f6zl\u00fc yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 \u015fik\u00e2yeti y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ula\u015f\u0131lan sonu\u00e7 g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde ba\u015fvurucunun, ba\u015fvuru konusu kararda hen\u00fcz y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmemi\u015f mevzuat de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011finin uyguland\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131n\u0131n ayr\u0131ca incelenmesine gerek olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M <\/p>\n
22. Ba\u015fvurucu, ihlalin tespiti ile miktar belirtmeksizin tazminat talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
23. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamda karar\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi yarg\u0131 mercilerince yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden yarg\u0131lama i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flatmak ve Anayasa Mahkemesini ihlal sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131ran nedenleri gideren, ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere uygun yeni bir karar vermektir (30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 50. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen bireysel ba\u015fvuruya \u00f6zg\u00fc yeniden yarg\u0131lama kurumunun \u00f6zelliklerine ili\u015fkin kapsaml\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamalar i\u00e7in bkz. Mehmet Do\u011fan [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n
24. \u0130hlalin ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n yeterli bir giderim sa\u011flayaca\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan tazminat talebinin reddine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Adli yard\u0131m talebinin KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n
B. S\u00f6zl\u00fc yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
C. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki s\u00f6zl\u00fc yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. Di\u011fer ihlal iddialar\u0131n\u0131n \u0130NCELENMES\u0130NE GEREK OLMADI\u011eINA,<\/p>\n
E. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin s\u00f6zl\u00fc yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere K\u0131r\u0131kkale 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesine iletilmek \u00fczere (2020\/672 D.\u0130\u015f) K\u0131r\u0131kkale \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine (E.2020\/1539, K.2020\/1583) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
F. Ba\u015fvurucunun tazminata ili\u015fkin talebinin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
G. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 17\/12\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 17\/12\/2024 tarihli ve 2020\/31562 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u0130BRAH\u0130M YA\u011eIZ BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/31562) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 17\/12\/2024 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM \u00a0 \u00a0 Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Metin KIRATLI Raport\u00f6r : Muhammed Cemil KANDEM\u0130R Ba\u015fvurucu : \u0130brahim YA\u011eIZ \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, disiplin cezas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 infaz h\u00e2kimli\u011fine yap\u0131lan \u015fik\u00e2yette yarg\u0131sal mercilerce s\u00f6zl\u00fc savunma al\u0131nmadan karar verilmesi nedeniyle adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir 2. Bireysel ba\u015fvurunun yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarih itibar\u0131yla, K\u0131r\u0131kkale F Tipi Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumunda (\u0130nfaz Kurumu) aralar\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun da bulundu\u011fu 76 mahpus hakk\u0131nda 15\/6\/2020 tarihinde sabah da\u011f\u0131t\u0131lan ia\u015felerini ald\u0131klar\u0131 fakat \u00f6\u011flen ve ak\u015fam ia\u015felerini almad\u0131klar\u0131ndan bahisle Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumu Disiplin Kurulu Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan (Disiplin Kurulu) 16\/6\/2020 tarihinde disiplin soru\u015fturmas\u0131 ba\u015flat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 3. \u0130nfaz Kurumunun g\u00f6revlendirdi\u011fi soru\u015fturmac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan disiplin soru\u015fturmas\u0131 raporu 30\/6\/2020 tarihinde Disiplin Kuruluna sunulmu\u015ftur. 4. Disiplin Kurulu taraf\u0131ndan 1\/7\/2020 tarihinde aralar\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun da oldu\u011fu mahpuslar hakk\u0131nda 13\/12\/2004 tarihli ve 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza ve G\u00fcvenlik Tedbirlerinin \u0130nfaz\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 42. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (a) bendinde d\u00fczenlenen “Protesto amac\u0131yla idarece verilen yeme\u011fi topluca almama eylemine kat\u0131lmak” fiilini i\u015fledikleri kabul edilerek bu ki\u015filerin “Bir ay ziyaret\u00e7i kabul\u00fcnden yoksun …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-34541","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n