T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
CANAN G\u00dcL VE E\u011e\u0130T\u0130M VE B\u0130L\u0130M EMEK\u00c7\u0130LER\u0130 SEND\u0130KASI BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2022\/74477)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 18\/12\/2024<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Recai AKYEL<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Selahaddin MENTE\u015e<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Muhammed Cemil KANDEM\u0130R<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucular<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
1. Canan G\u00dcL<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
2. E\u011fitim ve Bilim Emek\u00e7ileri Sendikas\u0131<\/p>\n
Vekilleri<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Necmiye \u015eABBAZ BA\u015eEL<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru; \u00f6\u011fretmen olan ba\u015fvurucunun \u00fcyesi oldu\u011fu sendikan\u0131n \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131s\u0131 \u00fczerine bir g\u00fcn g\u00f6reve gitmemesi nedeniyle ayl\u0131ktan kesme cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, soru\u015fturmada zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcrelerine uyulmamas\u0131n\u0131n ve farkl\u0131 mahkemeler aras\u0131nda ayn\u0131 konuya ili\u015fkin i\u00e7tihat farkl\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 bulunmas\u0131n\u0131n adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131 ihlal etti\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucu, ba\u015fvuruya konu olaylar\u0131n ya\u015fand\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihte \u015eanl\u0131urfa’n\u0131n Siverek il\u00e7esinde bir ilkokulda \u00f6\u011fretmen olarak g\u00f6rev yapmaktad\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu, E\u011fitim ve Bilim Emek\u00e7ileri Sendikas\u0131 (E\u011fitim-Sen) \u00fcyesidir.<\/p>\n
3. Somut olay 2015 y\u0131l\u0131 Haziran ay\u0131ndan itibaren yo\u011fun bir \u015fekilde maruz kal\u0131nan ter\u00f6r eylemleriyle m\u00fccadele kapsam\u0131nda baz\u0131 il\u00e7elerde ilan edilen soka\u011fa \u00e7\u0131kma yasaklar\u0131 (arka plan bilgisi i\u00e7in bkz. Dilek Kaya, B. No: 2018\/14313, 17\/7\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 8-11) ile yine ayn\u0131 y\u0131l\u0131n ekim ay\u0131nda meydana gelen Ankara Tren Gar\u0131 sald\u0131r\u0131s\u0131 (arka plan bilgisi i\u00e7in bkz. Tayyip Akbudak, B. No: 2018\/5558, 11\/9\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 8-13) etraf\u0131nda \u015fekillenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. E\u011fitim-Sen, ba\u011fl\u0131 oldu\u011fu Kamu Emek\u00e7ileri Sendikalar\u0131 Konfederasyonunun (KESK) alm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu kararlar do\u011frultusunda (bkz. Dilek Kaya, \u00a714; Tayyip Akbudak, \u00a716) bahse konu olaylar\u0131 protesto etmek amac\u0131yla \u00fcyelerinin belirli tarihlerde g\u00f6reve gitmeyerek yap\u0131lacak bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131na kat\u0131lmalar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde kararlar alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. E\u011fitim-Sen Merkez Y\u00fcr\u00fctme Kurulunun KESK’in karar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 25\/12\/2015 tarihli 12 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 \u015fu \u015fekildedir:<\/p>\n
“29 Aral\u0131k 2015 tarihinde Konfederasyonumuz KESK’in di\u011fer emek ve meslek \u00f6rg\u00fctleri ile birlikte alm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu 92 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 gere\u011fince Sava\u015fa Hay\u0131r Bar\u0131\u015f\u0131 Savunaca\u011f\u0131z \u015fiar\u0131yla ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirece\u011fi \u00fcretimden gelen g\u00fcc\u00fcm\u00fcz\u00fc kullanarak 1 g\u00fcnl\u00fck hizmet \u00fcretmeme karar\u0131n\u0131n i\u015f kolumuzda hayata ge\u00e7irilmesine oy birli\u011fi ile karar verilmi\u015ftir.” (Dilek Kaya, \u00a7\u00a7 14, 15).<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucu, KESK ve E\u011fitim-Sen’in yukar\u0131da yer verilen kararlar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda 29\/12\/2015 tarihinde g\u00f6revine gitmemi\u015ftir. \u0130dare, s\u00f6z konusu eylemi nedeniyle ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda disiplin soru\u015fturmas\u0131 ba\u015flatm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Nihayetinde ba\u015fvurucunun 14\/7\/1965 tarihli ve 657 say\u0131l\u0131 Devlet Memurlar\u0131 Kanunu’nun 125. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (C) bendinin (b) alt bendi uyar\u0131nca “\u00f6z\u00fcrs\u00fcz olarak bir veya iki g\u00fcn g\u00f6reve gelmedi\u011fi” gerek\u00e7esiyle ayl\u0131ktan kesme cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu bu i\u015flemin iptali talebiyle dava a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
6. \u015eanl\u0131urfa 2. \u0130dare Mahkemesi (Mahkeme) 27\/3\/2020 tarihli karar\u0131yla davay\u0131 reddetmi\u015ftir. Mahkeme karar\u0131nda; disiplin cezas\u0131na konu eyleminin 29\/12\/2015 tarihinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi, daval\u0131 idare taraf\u0131ndan 26\/1\/2016 tarihinde maarif m\u00fcfetti\u015f g\u00f6revlendirildi\u011fi belirtilerek, ba\u015fvurucunun disiplin amirinin disiplin cezas\u0131 verme yetkisinin zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131na u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131 yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir. Karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde; kamu g\u00f6revlilerinin, ekonomik, sosyal ve mesleki hak ve menfaatlerinin ve bu kapsamda \u00f6zl\u00fck ve parasal haklar\u0131n\u0131n, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131, iyile\u015ftirilmesi, geli\u015ftirilmesi amac\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131mayan s\u00f6z konusu i\u015f b\u0131rakma eylemine kat\u0131lan ve bu nedenle g\u00f6revine gelmeyen, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla g\u00f6revleri ve meslekleri ile herhangi bir \u015fekilde ilintisi olmayan, sadece vatanda\u015f olarak demokratik bir toplumda ya\u015famalar\u0131 nedeniyle kullanma \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fckleri bulunan haklar\u0131n\u0131 kullanarak mesai d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kat\u0131labilecekleri bir eyleme mesai i\u00e7inde kat\u0131larak vatanda\u015flar\u0131n kamu hizmetinden faydalanma hakk\u0131n\u0131 engelleme sonucunu do\u011furan fiili i\u015fleyen davac\u0131 hakk\u0131nda tesis edilen dava konusu i\u015flemde hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. Ba\u015fvurucunun istinaf talebi B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesince reddedilerek karar kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. Ba\u015fvurucu, nihai karar\u0131 24\/6\/2022 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra 8\/7\/2022 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
A. Ger\u00e7ek Ki\u015fi Ba\u015fvurucu Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden<\/p>\n
1. \u00d6rg\u00fctlenme \u00d6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
10. Ba\u015fvurucu, \u00fcyesi oldu\u011fu sendikan\u0131n ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 karar do\u011frultusunda bir g\u00fcn g\u00f6reve gitmemesi nedeniyle ayl\u0131ktan kesme cezas\u0131yla cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fc d\u00fczenleme, dernek ve sendika kurma, ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve ayr\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131k yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ihlal etti\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Ba\u015fvurucu, ayr\u0131ca verilen disiplin cezas\u0131n\u0131n onur k\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 ve a\u015fa\u011f\u0131lay\u0131c\u0131 oldu\u011funu iddia etmi\u015ftir. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde; Anayasa Mahkemesi kararlar\u0131nda, sendika \u00fcyelerinin ekonomik ve sosyal menfaatleriyle do\u011frudan ilgili olmayan ve politik y\u00f6n\u00fc a\u011f\u0131r basan bir ama\u00e7la i\u015fe gitmemek \u015feklinde bir eylemin yol a\u00e7aca\u011f\u0131 sonu\u00e7lara devlet idaresinin ve toplumun katlanmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektiren bir sebep bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu; kar\u015f\u0131 beyan\u0131nda eylem karar\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvurucu sendikan\u0131n t\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne uygun oldu\u011funu, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucu sendikay\u0131 ilgilendirmedi\u011finden s\u00f6z edilemeyece\u011fini, eylem karar\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvurucunun do\u011frudan \u00f6zl\u00fck ve mali haklar\u0131yla ilgili olmasa da \u00e7at\u0131\u015fma ya\u015fanan il\u00e7elerdeki e\u011fitim \u00f6\u011fretim hakk\u0131yla ilgili oldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
11. Anayasa Mahkemesi, Dilek Kaya karar\u0131nda ba\u015fvuru konusu eylem ile ayn\u0131 sendika \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131s\u0131na dayanan g\u00f6reve gitmeme eylemi nedeniyle yap\u0131lan bir m\u00fcdahalenin sendika hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenip incelenemeyece\u011fini de\u011ferlendirmi\u015ftir. An\u0131lan kararda sendikan\u0131n eylem \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma hayat\u0131na ili\u015fkin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve \u00e7ekirdek faaliyet alan\u0131nda kalmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilerek ba\u015fvurunun sendika hakk\u0131ndan incelenemeyece\u011fine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla \u015fu h\u00e2lde mevcut ba\u015fvuru y\u00f6n\u00fcnden de s\u00f6z konusu kararda a\u00e7\u0131klanan ilkelerden ve ula\u015f\u0131lan sonu\u00e7tan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren bir durum bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Bu itibarla mevcut ba\u015fvurunun \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc y\u00f6n\u00fcnden incelenmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir (Dilek Kaya, \u00a7\u00a7 38-42).<\/p>\n
12. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
13. \u00d6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne yap\u0131lan m\u00fcdahalenin dayana\u011f\u0131 olan 657 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 125. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (C) bendinin (b) alt bendinin kanunla s\u0131n\u0131rlama \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fc kar\u015f\u0131lad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. M\u00fcdahalenin kamu hizmetlerinin s\u00fcreklili\u011finin sa\u011flanmas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik \u00f6nlemlerin bir par\u00e7as\u0131 oldu\u011fu ve Anayasa’n\u0131n 33. maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda yer alan kamu d\u00fczeninin korunmas\u0131 me\u015fru amac\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir. \u00d6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne y\u00f6nelik bir m\u00fcdahalenin demokratik toplum d\u00fczeninin gereklerine uygun kabul edilebilmesi i\u00e7in zorunlu bir toplumsal ihtiyac\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lamas\u0131 ve orant\u0131l\u0131 olmas\u0131 gerekir ( Dilek Kaya, \u00a7\u00a7 55-59). Bu itibarla m\u00fcdahalenin demokratik toplum d\u00fczeninin gereklerine uygunlu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcnden inceleme yap\u0131lacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n
14. Anayasa Mahkemesi Dilek Kaya karar\u0131nda ba\u015fvuru konusu ile ayn\u0131 sendika karar\u0131ndan kaynakl\u0131 olarak g\u00f6reve gitmeyen ba\u015fvurucuya yap\u0131lan ayl\u0131ktan kesme disiplin cezas\u0131 \u015feklindeki m\u00fcdahaleyi \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc y\u00f6n\u00fcnden incelemi\u015ftir. Buna g\u00f6re eylemin \u00fclkenin i\u00e7 siyasetine ili\u015fkin sosyo-politik unsurlar\u0131n a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131kta oldu\u011fu bir amaca ili\u015fkin oldu\u011funu belirterek sendika \u00fcyelerinin ekonomik ve sosyal menfaatleriyle do\u011frudan ilgili olmayan ve politik y\u00f6n\u00fc a\u011f\u0131r basan bir ama\u00e7la i\u015fe gitmemek \u015feklinde bir eylemin yol a\u00e7aca\u011f\u0131 sonu\u00e7lara devlet idaresinin ve toplumun katlanmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektiren bir sebep bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmi\u015f, \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlal edilmedi\u011fine karar vermi\u015ftir (Dilek Kaya, \u00a7\u00a7 62-64). Buna g\u00f6re ba\u015fvuru konusu m\u00fcdahalenin de ayn\u0131 sendika karar\u0131n\u0131n uygulanmas\u0131ndan kaynakland\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bahse konu kararda a\u00e7\u0131klanan ilkelerden ve ula\u015f\u0131lan sonu\u00e7tan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren bir durum bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
15. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle disiplin cezas\u0131 verilmesi \u015feklinde yap\u0131lan m\u00fcdahale demokratik toplum d\u00fczeninin gereklerine uygun oldu\u011fundan Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 33. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlal edilmedi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
2. Adil Yarg\u0131lanma Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddialar<\/p>\n
16. Ba\u015fvurucu, ayn\u0131 sendika karar\u0131ndan kaynaklanan m\u00fcdahalelerin incelendi\u011fi davalarda baz\u0131 mahkemelerce iptal kararlar\u0131 verildi\u011fini belirterek i\u00e7tihat farkl\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 nedeniyle adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
17. Anayasa Mahkemesi Dilek Kaya ba\u015fvurusunda adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen benzer bir iddian\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar vermi\u015ftir (Dilek Kaya, \u00a7\u00a7 65-70). Buna g\u00f6re mevcut ba\u015fvuru y\u00f6n\u00fcnden de bu kapsamda bir ihlal olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
18. \u00d6te yandan ba\u015fvurucu, disiplin cezas\u0131na konu g\u00f6reve gitmeme eyleminin ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn idarece \u00f6\u011frenildi\u011fini, soru\u015fturman\u0131n zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcrelerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesi nedeniyle adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Mahkeme karar\u0131nda (bkz. \u00a7 6) ba\u015fvurucunun soru\u015fturma zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131na ili\u015fkin iddias\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Mahkemenin bu yorumunun bariz takdir hatas\u0131 veya keyfilik i\u00e7ermedi\u011fi de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir. Bu nedenle somut ba\u015fvuruda a\u00e7\u0131k ve g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcr bir ihlal bulunmamaktad\u0131r (benzer de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7in bkz. P\u0131nar \u00c7ankaya Ula\u015f, B. No: 2018\/9270, 19\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 31-39.)<\/p>\n
19. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurucunun adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddialar\u0131n\u0131n di\u011fer kabul edilebilirlik ko\u015fullar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden incelenmeksizin a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
B. T\u00fczel Ki\u015fi Ba\u015fvurucu Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden<\/p>\n
20. Ba\u015fvuru, m\u00fcnhas\u0131ran ger\u00e7ek ki\u015fi ba\u015fvurucuya ayl\u0131ktan kesme disiplin cezas\u0131 verilmesine ili\u015fkindir. Somut olayda ba\u015fvurucu sendikaya herhangi bir yapt\u0131r\u0131m uygulanmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bununla birlikte ba\u015fvurucu, sendika t\u00fczel ki\u015fili\u011finin haklar\u0131n\u0131 do\u011frudan etkileyen somut bir olgu ileri s\u00fcrmemi\u015ftir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla t\u00fczel ki\u015fi ba\u015fvurucunun ihlale konu edilen i\u015flem nedeniyle g\u00fcncel ve ki\u015fisel bir hakk\u0131n\u0131n do\u011frudan etkilendi\u011fi s\u00f6ylenemez. Buna g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurunun t\u00fczel ki\u015fi ba\u015fvurucu y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ki\u015fi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yetkisizlik nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir (Onur Do\u011fanay, B. No: 2013\/1977, 9\/1\/2014, \u00a7 \u00a7 39-47).<\/p>\n
III. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. 1. Ger\u00e7ek ki\u015fi ba\u015fvurucu y\u00f6n\u00fcnden \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
2. Ger\u00e7ek ki\u015fi ba\u015fvurucu y\u00f6n\u00fcnden adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
3. T\u00fczel ki\u015fi ba\u015fvurucu y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ba\u015fvurunun ki\u015fi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yetkisizlik nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. Anayasa’n\u0131n 33. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LMED\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
C. Yarg\u0131lama giderlerinin ba\u015fvurucular \u00fczerinde BIRAKILMASINA,<\/p>\n
D. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 18\/12\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 18\/12\/2024 tarihli ve 2022\/74477 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 CANAN G\u00dcL VE E\u011e\u0130T\u0130M VE B\u0130L\u0130M EMEK\u00c7\u0130LER\u0130 SEND\u0130KASI BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2022\/74477) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 18\/12\/2024 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Recai AKYEL \u00a0 \u00a0 Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ \u00a0 \u00a0 Selahaddin MENTE\u015e \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : Muhammed Cemil KANDEM\u0130R Ba\u015fvurucular : 1. Canan G\u00dcL \u00a0 \u00a0 2. E\u011fitim ve Bilim Emek\u00e7ileri Sendikas\u0131 Vekilleri : Av. Necmiye \u015eABBAZ BA\u015eEL \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru; \u00f6\u011fretmen olan ba\u015fvurucunun \u00fcyesi oldu\u011fu sendikan\u0131n \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131s\u0131 \u00fczerine bir g\u00fcn g\u00f6reve gitmemesi nedeniyle ayl\u0131ktan kesme cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, soru\u015fturmada zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcrelerine uyulmamas\u0131n\u0131n ve farkl\u0131 mahkemeler aras\u0131nda ayn\u0131 konuya ili\u015fkin i\u00e7tihat farkl\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 bulunmas\u0131n\u0131n adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131 ihlal etti\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu, ba\u015fvuruya konu olaylar\u0131n ya\u015fand\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihte \u015eanl\u0131urfa’n\u0131n Siverek il\u00e7esinde bir ilkokulda \u00f6\u011fretmen olarak g\u00f6rev yapmaktad\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu, E\u011fitim ve Bilim Emek\u00e7ileri Sendikas\u0131 (E\u011fitim-Sen) \u00fcyesidir. 3. Somut olay 2015 y\u0131l\u0131 Haziran ay\u0131ndan itibaren yo\u011fun bir \u015fekilde maruz kal\u0131nan ter\u00f6r eylemleriyle m\u00fccadele kapsam\u0131nda baz\u0131 il\u00e7elerde ilan edilen soka\u011fa \u00e7\u0131kma yasaklar\u0131 (arka plan bilgisi i\u00e7in bkz. Dilek Kaya, B. No: 2018\/14313, 17\/7\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 8-11) ile yine ayn\u0131 y\u0131l\u0131n ekim ay\u0131nda meydana gelen Ankara Tren Gar\u0131 sald\u0131r\u0131s\u0131 (arka …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-33688","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n