{"id":33375,"date":"2025-02-18T15:05:00","date_gmt":"2025-02-18T12:05:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uncategorized-tr\/tamirat-ve-tadilat-islemleri-karsiligi-bedelin-odenmemesi-nedeniyle-baslatilan-icra-takibine-itirazin-iptali\/"},"modified":"2025-02-18T15:05:00","modified_gmt":"2025-02-18T12:05:00","slug":"tamirat-ve-tadilat-islemleri-karsiligi-bedelin-odenmemesi-nedeniyle-baslatilan-icra-takibine-itirazin-iptali","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/tamirat-ve-tadilat-islemleri-karsiligi-bedelin-odenmemesi-nedeniyle-baslatilan-icra-takibine-itirazin-iptali\/","title":{"rendered":"TAM\u0130RAT VE TAD\u0130LAT \u0130\u015eLEMLER\u0130 KAR\u015eILI\u011eI BEDEL\u0130N \u00d6DENMEMES\u0130 NEDEN\u0130YLE BA\u015eLATILAN \u0130CRA TAK\u0130B\u0130NE \u0130T\u0130RAZIN \u0130PTAL\u0130"},"content":{"rendered":"

T.C.
\nYARGITAY
\n3. HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130
\nE. 2024\/247
\nK. 2024\/1649
\nT. 13.5.2024<\/p>\n

TAM\u0130RAT VE TAD\u0130LAT \u0130\u015eLEMLER\u0130 KAR\u015eILI\u011eI BEDEL\u0130N \u00d6DENMEMES\u0130 NEDEN\u0130YLE BA\u015eLATILAN \u0130CRA TAK\u0130B\u0130NE \u0130T\u0130RAZIN \u0130PTAL\u0130 ( Daval\u0131 Taraf\u0131ndan \u00d6deme Emrine S\u00fcresinde Yap\u0131lan Yetki \u0130tiraz\u0131n\u0131n Mahkeme Taraf\u0131ndan \u00d6ncelikle De\u011ferlendirilmesi ve Yetki \u0130tiraz\u0131n\u0131n Yerinde Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 Anla\u015f\u0131l\u0131rsa Esas\u0131n \u0130ncelenmesi Gerekirken Yetki \u0130tiraz\u0131 Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden Herhangi Bir De\u011ferlendirme Yap\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n Karar Verilmesinin Usul ve Yasaya Ayk\u0131r\u0131 Bulundu\u011fu )<\/p>\n

TANIK DEL\u0130L\u0130 ( Dava Dilek\u00e7esinde Tan\u0131k Deliline Dayanmayan Davac\u0131n\u0131n 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu\u2019nun 145. Maddesi Uyar\u0131nca Yasal S\u00fcrede \u0130leri S\u00fcrmedi\u011fi Tan\u0131k Deliline Dayanarak H\u00fck\u00fcm Kurulmas\u0131 M\u00fcmk\u00fcn Olmay\u0131p Mahkemece S\u00fcresinde Bildirilmeyen Tan\u0131klar\u0131n Beyanlar\u0131na Dayan\u0131larak Karar Verilmesinin \u0130sabetsizli\u011fi )<\/p>\n

ADL\u0130 YARDIM ( Ticaret \u015eirketlerinin Adli Yard\u0131mdan Yararlanamayaca\u011f\u0131\/Davac\u0131 \u015eirketin Adli Yard\u0131m Talebinin Kabul Edilmesinin Usul ve Yasaya Ayk\u0131r\u0131 Bulundu\u011fu )<\/p>\n

2004\/m.50,67<\/p>\n

6098\/m.89<\/p>\n

6100\/m.115,119,145,334<\/p>\n

\u00d6ZET: Dava, davac\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131n\u0131n evinde yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 tadilat bedellerinin kendisine \u00f6denmemesi nedeniyle ba\u015flat\u0131lan takibe itiraz\u0131n iptali istemine ili\u015fkin olup, kanun yarar\u0131na temyiz a\u015famas\u0131nda uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k, \u00f6deme emrine itirazda ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen yetki itiraz\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilip de\u011ferlendirilmeyece\u011fi, davac\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcresinde dayanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tan\u0131k deliline dayanarak davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilip verilmeyece\u011fi ve davac\u0131 \u015firketin adli yard\u0131mdan yararlan\u0131p yararlanmayaca\u011f\u0131 noktas\u0131nda toplanmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Dava dosyas\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesinde; davac\u0131 vekilinin dava dilek\u00e7esinde tan\u0131k deliline dayanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, Mahkemece 28.05.2019 tarihli duru\u015fmas\u0131nda 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 140. maddesinin be\u015finci f\u0131kras\u0131na dayal\u0131 tan\u0131k bildiren taraf\u0131n, tan\u0131k dinletmek istedi\u011fi vak\u0131ay\u0131 ve dinlenilmesi istenen tan\u0131klar\u0131n ad\u0131 ve soyad\u0131 ile tebli\u011fe elveri\u015fli adreslerini i\u00e7eren muhatap say\u0131s\u0131ndan bir suret fazla dilek\u00e7eyle bildirmesi i\u00e7in 2 haftal\u0131k kesin s\u00fcre verildi\u011fi ve bu s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde davac\u0131 vekilinin tan\u0131k isim ve adreslerini bildirdi\u011fi ve bildirilen tan\u0131klar\u0131n beyanlar\u0131 h\u00fckme esas al\u0131narak davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne karar verildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Dava dilek\u00e7esinde tan\u0131k deliline dayanmayan, sonradan delil g\u00f6sterilebilmesi i\u00e7in 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 145. maddesinde belirtilen istisnai hallerin mevcudiyetini de ileri s\u00fcrmeyen davac\u0131 vekilinin \u00f6n inceleme a\u015famas\u0131ndan sonra bildirdi\u011fi tan\u0131klar\u0131n dinlenmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n

O halde Mahkemece; davac\u0131 vekilince s\u00fcresinde ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclmeyen ve bildirilmeyen tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131 h\u00fckme esas al\u0131narak davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 olup, Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bu y\u00f6ne ili\u015fen kanun yarar\u0131n\u0131n temyiz talebinin kabul\u00fc gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n adli yard\u0131ma ili\u015fkin kanun yarar\u0131na temyiz itiraz\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesinde;<\/p>\n

Adli yard\u0131mdan yararlanacak ki\u015filer 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 334. maddesinde say\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. An\u0131lan maddenin birinci bendine g\u00f6re ancak ger\u00e7ek ki\u015filer, ikinci bendine g\u00f6re de ancak kamuya yararl\u0131 dernek ve vak\u0131flar adli yard\u0131mdan yararlanabilir. Kamuya yararl\u0131 dernek ve vak\u0131flar d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki t\u00fczel ki\u015filerin adli yard\u0131mdan yararlanmalar\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n

O halde Mahkemece; adli yard\u0131m talebinde bulunan davac\u0131n\u0131n, ticaret \u015firketi olup adli yard\u0131mdan yararlanmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan adli yard\u0131m talebinin reddine karar verilmesi gerekirken kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 olup, Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bu y\u00f6ne ili\u015fen kanun yarar\u0131na temyiz talebinin kabul\u00fc gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

DAVA : Taraflar aras\u0131nda, \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesinde g\u00f6r\u00fclen itiraz\u0131n iptali davas\u0131nda davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince kesin olarak verilen karar\u0131n kanun yarar\u0131na temyizen incelenmesi Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan istenilmi\u015f olmakla; Tetkik H\u00e2kimi taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan rapor dinlendikten sonra dosyadaki belgeler incelenip gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n

KARAR : I. DAVA<\/p>\n

Davac\u0131 vekili; daval\u0131n\u0131n, m\u00fcvekkili … \u0130n\u015faat Turizm \u00d6zel E\u011fitim Hizmetleri \u0130leti\u015fim Paz. San. D\u0131\u015f Tic. Ltd. \u015eti. yetkilisi Hasbi Demirci’ye evinin tamirat ve tadilat i\u015flerini yerine getirmek i\u00e7in vekaletname verdi\u011fini, bu vekaletnameye dayanarak m\u00fcvekkili \u015firket yetkilisinin daval\u0131n\u0131n Baruthane Mahallesi, D\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn \u00c7i\u00e7e\u011fi Sokak, 370 Ada, 1 Parsel, \u0130lkad\u0131m \/ Samsun adresinde bulunan evinin tamirat ve tadilat i\u015flemlerini yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve bu i\u015flemlerin masraflar\u0131n\u0131 bizzat kendisinin kar\u015f\u0131lad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, yap\u0131lan t\u00fcm masraflar i\u00e7in fatura d\u00fczenlendi\u011fini ve usul\u00fcne uygun olarak da faturan\u0131n daval\u0131ya iletildi\u011fini, daval\u0131ya yap\u0131lan uyar\u0131lara ra\u011fmen borcun \u00f6denmedi\u011fini, daval\u0131 hakk\u0131nda Samsun 9. \u0130cra M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn 2018\/48072 E. say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131 ile ilams\u0131z takip yolu ile takip yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, daval\u0131n\u0131n icra takibine yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu itiraz \u00fczerine takibin durdu\u011funu belirterek, daval\u0131n\u0131n icra takibine yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu itiraz\u0131n\u0131n iptali ile daval\u0131n\u0131n as\u0131l alaca\u011f\u0131n % 20’sinden a\u015fa\u011f\u0131 olmamak \u00fczere icra inkar tazminat\u0131na mahkum edilmesine karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

II. CEVAP<\/p>\n

Daval\u0131; cevap dilek\u00e7esi vermemi\u015f, ancak 18.12.2018 tarihli duru\u015fmada “davan\u0131n reddine karar verilsin, ben ev han\u0131m\u0131y\u0131m.” \u015feklinde beyanda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

III. \u0130LK DERECE MAHKEMES\u0130 KARARI<\/p>\n

1. Samsun Asliye Ticaret Mahkemesi’nin 18.12.2018 tarihli ve 2018\/544 E., 2018\/904 K. say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131yla; daval\u0131n\u0131n dava a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihte tacir ve esnaf olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, eldeki davan\u0131n da T\u00fcrk Ticaret Kanunu’nda d\u00fczenlenen mutlak ticari davalardan bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle dava dilek\u00e7esinin dava \u015fart\u0131 yoklu\u011fundan usulden reddine, Mahkemenin g\u00f6revsizli\u011fine, davaya bakmakta g\u00f6revli Mahkemenin Samsun N\u00f6bet\u00e7i Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi oldu\u011funa karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

2. Dosyan\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi Samsun 3. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi’nin 04.10.2022 tarihli ve 2019\/131 E., 2022\/571 K. say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131yla; somut olayda daval\u0131n\u0131n davac\u0131 \u015firket temsilcisi Hasbi Demirci ile daval\u0131 Nur\u015fel \u00d6zel aras\u0131nda Ankara 6. Noterli\u011finin 13.10.1992 tarihli ve 41936 yevmiye numaral\u0131 vek\u00e2letnamesi ile vek\u00e2let ili\u015fkisi kuruldu\u011fu, s\u00f6z konusu vek\u00e2letname kapsam\u0131nda daval\u0131n\u0131n Baruthane Mah., D\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00e7i\u00e7e\u011fi Sok., No:39, \u0130lkad\u0131m\/Samsun adresinde bulunan gayrimenkul\u00fcn\u00fcn sat\u0131\u015f\u0131 ve sat\u0131\u015f bedellerinin al\u0131nmas\u0131 da dahil \u00fczerinde irtifak kurulmas\u0131 vb. her t\u00fcrl\u00fc tasarruf yetkisi ile birlikte gayrimenkul\u00fcn bir k\u0131sm\u0131 veya tamam\u0131 \u00fczerinde gereken her t\u00fcrl\u00fc tamirat ve tadilatlar\u0131n yap\u0131lmas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde davac\u0131 temsilcisine yetki verildi\u011fi, davac\u0131 temsilcisi taraf\u0131ndan vek\u00e2letnameye istinaden Samsun 1. Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesi’nin 2006\/51 D.\u0130\u015f say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131nda ald\u0131r\u0131lan bilirki\u015fi raporundaki tespitler do\u011frultusunda daval\u0131n\u0131n gayrimenkul\u00fcnde tamirat ve tadilat i\u015flerini yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131, yap\u0131lan i\u015f kapsam\u0131nda davac\u0131 temsilcisi taraf\u0131ndan daval\u0131 ad\u0131na 28.08.2008 tarih ve 48401 no.lu faturan\u0131n d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi, Mahkemece dinlenen ve itibar edilen tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131na g\u00f6re dava konusu alaca\u011fa te\u015fkil eden tamirat ve tadilat i\u015fleri d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda ayr\u0131ca davac\u0131 temsilcisi taraf\u0131ndan daval\u0131n\u0131n gayrimenkul\u00fcn\u00fcn kanalizasyon borusunun da yenilendi\u011fi, dosyaya ald\u0131r\u0131lan h\u00fck\u00fcm ve denetime elveri\u015fli bilirki\u015fi raporlar\u0131na g\u00f6re davac\u0131 temsilcisinin daval\u0131n\u0131n gayrimenkul\u00fcnde tamirat, tadilat ve kanalizasyon borusunun yenilenmesi kapsam\u0131nda yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu i\u015fler nedeniyle daval\u0131dan 4.238,69 TL alacakl\u0131 oldu\u011funun tespit edildi\u011fi, davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen faturan\u0131n daval\u0131ya tebli\u011f ve teslim edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin dosyada delil bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ancak davac\u0131n\u0131n vek\u00e2letname kapsam\u0131nda daval\u0131n\u0131n gayrimenkul\u00fcndeki tamirat, tadilat yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve kanalizasyon borusunun da yenilendi\u011fini tan\u0131k anlat\u0131mlar\u0131yla ispat etti\u011fi, daval\u0131n\u0131n icra takibinden \u00f6nce temerr\u00fcde d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ili\u015fkin dosyada yaz\u0131l\u0131 bir belge bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve de\u011fi\u015fik i\u015f tespitinin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarih itibariyle as\u0131l alacak olarak 4.238,69 TL’nin tespit edildi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne, Samsun 9. \u0130cra M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn 2018\/48072 E. say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131nda yap\u0131lan itiraz\u0131n 4.238,69 TL as\u0131l alacak y\u00f6n\u00fcnden iptali ile takibin bu miktar \u00fczerinden devam\u0131na, kabul edilen as\u0131l alaca\u011f\u0131n %20’si oran\u0131nda icra inkar tazminat\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131dan al\u0131narak davac\u0131ya verilmesine karar verilmi\u015f; karar s\u00fcresinde davac\u0131 vekili ve daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istinaf edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

3. Samsun B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 5. Hukuk Dairesinin 05.01.2023 tarihli ve 2023\/62 E., 2023\/29 K. say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131yla; h\u00fck\u00fcm tarihine g\u00f6re istinafa konu edilen miktar itibar\u0131 ile kesin olan karara ili\u015fkin istinaf ba\u015fvurusunda bulunan davac\u0131 vekilinin ve daval\u0131 vekilinin istinaf dilek\u00e7elerinin ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

IV. KANUN YARARINA TEMY\u0130Z<\/p>\n

A. Kanun Yarar\u0131na Temyiz Yoluna Ba\u015fvuran<\/p>\n

\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi’nin yukar\u0131da belirtilen karar\u0131n\u0131n kanun yarar\u0131na temyizen incelenmesi Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan istenilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

B. Temyiz Sebepleri<\/p>\n

Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131nca; Mahkemece daval\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6deme emrine itiraz\u0131nda yetki itiraz\u0131nda da bulundu\u011fu dikkate al\u0131n\u0131p \u00f6ncelikle bu itiraz\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesi, \u015fayet itiraz usule uygun de\u011fil ya da haks\u0131z bir itirazsa i\u015fin esas\u0131na girilmesi, esas incelenirken de dava dilek\u00e7esinde davac\u0131 \u015firket yetkilisinin daval\u0131dan ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 vekaletnameye istinaden daval\u0131n\u0131n evinin tadilat\u0131n\u0131 davac\u0131 \u015firkete yapt\u0131r\u0131p bedelini bizzat \u00f6dedi\u011fi belirtildi\u011fine g\u00f6re somut davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesi gerekirken yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde iddian\u0131n geni\u015fletilmesi yasa\u011f\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 \u015fekilde dilek\u00e7eler a\u015famas\u0131nda tan\u0131k deliline dayanmam\u0131\u015f olan davac\u0131n\u0131n sonradan sundu\u011fu dilek\u00e7eyle bildirdi\u011fi tan\u0131klar\u0131n beyanlar\u0131na itibar edilerek karar verilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 ve ayr\u0131ca adli yard\u0131ma ili\u015fkin an\u0131lan madde dikkate al\u0131n\u0131p sermaye \u015firketlerinin adli yard\u0131mdan yararlanmayacaklar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6zetilmemesi de usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 bulundu\u011fu ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclerek; karar\u0131n kanun yarar\u0131na bozulmas\u0131 talep edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

C. Gerek\u00e7e<\/p>\n

1. Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k ve Hukuki Nitelendirme<\/p>\n

Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k, davac\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131n\u0131n evinde yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 tadilat bedellerinin kendisine \u00f6denmemesi nedeniyle ba\u015flat\u0131lan takibe itiraz\u0131n iptali istemine ili\u015fkin olup, kanun yarar\u0131na temyiz a\u015famas\u0131nda ise uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k, \u00f6deme emrine itirazda ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen yetki itiraz\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilip de\u011ferlendirilmeyece\u011fi, davac\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcresinde dayanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tan\u0131k deliline dayanarak davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilip verilmeyece\u011fi ve davac\u0131 \u015firketin adli yard\u0131mdan yararlan\u0131p yararlanmayaca\u011f\u0131 noktas\u0131nda toplanmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

2. \u0130lgili Hukuk<\/p>\n

1. 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu’nun 363. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca \u0130lk Derece Mahkemelerinin kesin olarak verdikleri kararlar ile istinaf incelemesinden ge\u00e7meden kesinle\u015fmi\u015f bulunan kararlar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131, y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckteki hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 bulundu\u011fu ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclerek, Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan kanun yarar\u0131na temyiz yoluna ba\u015fvurulur.<\/p>\n

2. Temyiz talebi Yarg\u0131tayca yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc takdirde, 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 363. maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca karar kanun yarar\u0131na bozulur ve bu bozma, karar\u0131n hukuki sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 ortadan kald\u0131rmaz.<\/p>\n

3. 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu’nun “Dava dilek\u00e7esinin i\u00e7eri\u011fi” ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 119. maddesi.<\/p>\n

4. 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un “Sonradan delil g\u00f6sterilmesi” ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 145. maddesi.<\/p>\n

5. 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un “Dava \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesi” ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 115. maddesi.<\/p>\n

6. 2004 Say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130cra ve \u0130flas Kanunu’nun “Yetki ve itirazlar\u0131” ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 50. maddesi.<\/p>\n

7. 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un “Adli yard\u0131mdan yararlanacak ki\u015filer” ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 334. maddesi.<\/p>\n

8. Yarg\u0131tay Hukuk Genel Kurulunun 16.11.2016 tarihli ve 2014\/2-1226 E., 2016\/1057 K. say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131.<\/p>\n

9.Yarg\u0131tay 3. Hukuk Dairesinin 09.05.2022 tarihli ve 2022\/2971 E., 2022\/4300 K. say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131.<\/p>\n

10. Yarg\u0131tay 3. Hukuk Dairesinin 19.12.2022 tarihli ve 2022\/6179 E., 2022\/9565 K. say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131.<\/p>\n

3. De\u011ferlendirme<\/p>\n

A. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6deme emrine yetki itiraz\u0131n\u0131n incelenmemesi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde kanun yarar\u0131na temyiz itiraz\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesinde;<\/p>\n

1. \u0130tiraz\u0131n iptali davas\u0131nda usul\u00fcne uygun olarak ba\u015flat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve itirazla durmu\u015f bir takibin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 dava \u015fart\u0131 olup, 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu’nun 115. maddesi uyar\u0131nca dava \u015fart\u0131n\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 yarg\u0131laman\u0131n her a\u015famas\u0131nda Mahkemece re’sen g\u00f6zetilmelidir.<\/p>\n

2. \u0130tiraz\u0131n iptali davas\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6ren mahkemenin, icra takibinin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 icra dairesinin yetkisine y\u00f6nelik itiraz\u0131 \u00f6ncelikle incelemesi gerekir. Mahkemenin yetkisine y\u00f6nelik bir itiraz\u0131n var olup olmamas\u0131, bu sonuca etkili de\u011fildir. E\u015f s\u00f6yleyi\u015fle, itiraz\u0131n iptali davas\u0131nda, mahkemenin yetkisine itiraz edilmi\u015f olsun veya olmas\u0131n, Mahkeme \u00f6ncelikle, icra dairesinin yetkisine y\u00f6nelik itiraz\u0131 inceleyerek kesin olarak sonu\u00e7land\u0131rmal\u0131d\u0131r ( HGK’n\u0131n 28.03.2001 g\u00fcn ve 2001\/19-267 E. 2001\/311 K.; 20.03.2002 g\u00fcn ve 2002\/13-241 E.,2002\/208 K. ).<\/p>\n

3.Kald\u0131 ki, itiraz\u0131n iptali davas\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6rme yetkisi, takibin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 yer Mahkemesine aittir. O nedenle, Mahkemenin, icra dairesinin yetkisine y\u00f6nelik itiraz\u0131 incelemesi do\u011fald\u0131r. Bu yetki itiraz\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesi sonucunda, Mahkeme, kendisinin yetkili olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 da belirlemi\u015f olacakt\u0131r. (\u00dcst\u00fcnda\u011f, S: \u0130cra Hukukunun Esaslar\u0131, \u0130stanbul 1995, 6. Bas\u0131, s. 101-102)(Yarg\u0131tay Hukuk Genel Kurulu’ nun 27.11.2013 g\u00fcn ve 2013\/13-372 E., 2013\/1606 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131).<\/p>\n

4. \u0130lams\u0131z bir takipte yetkili icra dairesi de \u0130cra \u0130flas Kanunu’nun 50. maddesinin yollamas\u0131 ile 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu’nun genel h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re belirlenecektir. 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 6. maddesine g\u00f6re genel yetkili icra dairesi, daval\u0131 ger\u00e7ek veya t\u00fczel ki\u015finin takibin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihteki yerle\u015fim yeri icra dairesidir. Ayn\u0131 yasan\u0131n “s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerden do\u011fan davalarda yetki” ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 10. maddesinde; s\u00f6zle\u015fmeden do\u011fan davalar\u0131n s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin ifa edilece\u011fi yer Mahkemesinde de a\u00e7\u0131labilece\u011fi h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f olup, bu sebeple s\u00f6zle\u015fmeden do\u011fan para borcunun tahsili i\u00e7in ba\u015flat\u0131lan takipte, s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin ifa edilece\u011fi yer icra dairesi de yetkili k\u0131l\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Takibin konusu s\u00f6zle\u015fmeden kaynakl\u0131 para borcu oldu\u011funda, davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihte y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan 6098 Say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Bor\u00e7lar Kanunu’nun 89. maddesine g\u00f6re, aksi kararla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131k\u00e7a para bor\u00e7lar\u0131 alacakl\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6deme zaman\u0131ndaki yerle\u015fim yerinde ifa edilecektir.<\/p>\n

5. Yetki itiraz\u0131n\u0131n incelemesi neticesi Mahkeme yetkili oldu\u011funa karar verirse bor\u00e7lunun icra dairesine yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu yetki itiraz\u0131n\u0131n reddine karar verilecektir. Mahkeme yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu inceleme neticesi takip yap\u0131lan icra dairesinin yetkili olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na kanaat getirir ise \u201cYetkili icra dairesinde yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ge\u00e7erli bir takip olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan davan\u0131n reddine\u201d karar verecektir. (06.10.2004 tarih E:2004\/19-410 K:2004\/471 karar say\u0131l\u0131 Yarg\u0131tay Hukuk Genel Kurulu karar\u0131)<\/p>\n

6. Dava dosyas\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesinde; daval\u0131n\u0131n Samsun 9. \u0130cra M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn 2018\/48072 E. say\u0131l\u0131 takip dosyas\u0131nda \u00f6deme emrine s\u00fcresinde itiraz\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a yetkiye itiraz etti\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmakla a\u00e7\u0131lan itiraz\u0131n iptali davas\u0131nda Mahkemece, \u00f6ncelikle daval\u0131n\u0131n usul\u00fcne uygun yetki itiraz\u0131nda bulunup bulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6zetilerek yetki itiraz\u0131n\u0131n usule uygun oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 halinde itiraz\u0131nda belirtti\u011fi icra dairesinin yetkisinin ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 ve \u015fayet icra dairesinin yetkisine ili\u015fkin itiraz yerinde de\u011fil ise esasa ili\u015fkin itiraz\u0131n incelenmesine ge\u00e7ilerek h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 gerekirken yaz\u0131l\u0131 oldu\u011fu bi\u00e7imde yetki itiraz\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden de\u011ferlendirilme yap\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 olup bozma nedenidir.<\/p>\n

O halde Mahkemece, itiraz\u0131n iptali davas\u0131nda \u00f6ncelikle yetki itiraz\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden de\u011ferlendirilme yap\u0131l\u0131p karar verilmesi gerekti\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bu y\u00f6ne ili\u015fen kanun yarar\u0131na temyiz talebinin kabul\u00fc gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

B. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n dilek\u00e7elerin teatisi a\u015famas\u0131nda dayan\u0131lmayan tan\u0131k deliline g\u00f6re karar verilip verilmeyece\u011fine y\u00f6nelik kanun yarar\u0131na temyiz itiraz\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesinde;<\/p>\n

1. 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un \u201cDava Dilek\u00e7esinin \u0130\u00e7eri\u011fi\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 119\/1-e-f maddesine g\u00f6re; davac\u0131, dava dilek\u00e7esinde, iddias\u0131n\u0131n dayana\u011f\u0131 olan b\u00fct\u00fcn vak\u0131alar\u0131n s\u0131ra numaras\u0131 alt\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131k \u00f6zetlerini ve iddia edilen her bir vak\u0131an\u0131n hangi delillerle ispat edilece\u011fini a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a g\u00f6stermek zorundad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

2. Maddenin gerek\u00e7esinde bu gereklili\u011fin, 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’da bir yenilik olarak d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi ifade edilmi\u015ftir. Davac\u0131n\u0131n genel ifadelerle delillerini belirtmesi yeterli say\u0131lmay\u0131p hangi delillere dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 dilek\u00e7eden anla\u015f\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. Delillerin bildirilmesine ili\u015fkin bu d\u00fczenleme, somutla\u015ft\u0131rma y\u00fck\u00fcn\u00fcn de bir gere\u011fidir. (Pekcan\u0131tez, H. Atalay O. \u00d6zekes M.: Medeni Usul Hukuku Ders Kitab\u0131, 3. Bas\u0131, Ankara 2015, s. 277).<\/p>\n

3. 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un \u201cBelgelerin Birlikte Verilmesi\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 121. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131na g\u00f6re; dava dilek\u00e7esinde g\u00f6sterilen ve davac\u0131n\u0131n elinde bulunan belgelerin as\u0131llar\u0131yla birlikte har\u00e7 ve vergiye tabi olmaks\u0131z\u0131n daval\u0131 say\u0131s\u0131ndan bir fazla d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f \u00f6rneklerinin veya sadece \u00f6rneklerinin dilek\u00e7eye eklenerek, Mahkemeye verilmesi ve ba\u015fka yerlerden getirtilecek belge ve dosyalar i\u00e7in de bunlar\u0131n bulunabilmesini sa\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klaman\u0131n dilek\u00e7ede yer almas\u0131 zorunludur (Pekcan\u0131tez, H. Atalay O. \u00d6zekes M., s. 306).<\/p>\n

4. 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un \u201c\u00d6n \u0130nceleme Duru\u015fmas\u0131\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 140. maddesinin be\u015finci f\u0131kras\u0131na g\u00f6re; \u00f6n inceleme duru\u015fmas\u0131nda, taraflara dilek\u00e7elerinde g\u00f6sterdikleri, ancak hen\u00fcz sunmad\u0131klar\u0131 belgeleri Mahkemeye sunmalar\u0131 veya ba\u015fka yerden getirtilecek belgelerin getirtilebilmesi amac\u0131yla gereken a\u00e7\u0131klamay\u0131 yapmalar\u0131 i\u00e7in iki haftal\u0131k kesin s\u00fcre verilir. Bu hususlar\u0131n verilen kesin s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde tam olarak yerine getirilmemesi h\u00e2linde, o delile dayanmaktan vazge\u00e7ilmi\u015f say\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilir. Ayn\u0131 Kanun’un 119. ve 121. maddelerinde delillerin g\u00f6sterilmesinden bahsedilmesine ra\u011fmen, 137. ve 140. maddelerinde delillerin sunulmas\u0131ndan ve toplanmas\u0131ndan bahsedilmektedir. Burada vurgulanmas\u0131 gereken husus \u00f6zellikle 140. maddede; \u201cdilek\u00e7elerinde g\u00f6sterdikleri\u201d ibaresinin kullan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n

5. 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 140. maddesinin gerek\u00e7esinde belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere taraflar, delil olarak dayand\u0131klar\u0131 belgeleri dilek\u00e7elerine ekleyerek vermek ya da ba\u015fka yerden getirilecekse, bunu belirtmek zorundad\u0131rlar. \u015eayet taraflar, bu konuda yapmalar\u0131 gereken i\u015flemleri eksik b\u0131rakm\u0131\u015flarsa, tahkikata ba\u015flamadan \u00f6nce, taraflara son kez k\u0131sa bir s\u00fcre verilerek bu eksiklikleri tamamlamalar\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Taraflar bu \u015fanslar\u0131n\u0131 da do\u011fru kullanamazlarsa, art\u0131k tahkikat mevcut delillerle y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclecek ve taraflar\u0131n o delile dayanmaktan vazge\u00e7tikleri kabul edilecektir.<\/p>\n

6. Dilek\u00e7elerin teatisi a\u015famalar\u0131 bu \u015fekilde net s\u00fcrelere ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak d\u00fczenlendikten sonra yasa koyucu, delil bildirmenin s\u00fcreye ba\u011fl\u0131 oldu\u011funu tekrar vurgulayan 145. maddeye yer vermi\u015ftir. 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un \u201cSonradan Delil G\u00f6sterilmesi\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 145. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131na g\u00f6re; taraflar, Kanunda belirtilen s\u00fcreden sonra delil g\u00f6steremezler. Ancak bir delilin sonradan ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclmesi yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 geciktirme amac\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131m\u0131yorsa veya s\u00fcresinde ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclememesi ilgili taraf\u0131n kusurundan kaynaklanm\u0131yorsa, Mahkeme o delilin sonradan g\u00f6sterilmesine izin verebilir.<\/p>\n

7. 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 145. maddesinin birinci c\u00fcmlesinde de; taraflar\u0131n, Kanunda belirtilen s\u00fcreden sonra delil g\u00f6steremeyecekleri a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtilmi\u015ftir. 145. maddenin ikinci c\u00fcmlesinde; birinci c\u00fcmledeki taraflar\u0131n Kanunda belirtilen s\u00fcreden sonra delil g\u00f6steremeyeceklerine ili\u015fkin olarak getirilen istisnan\u0131n dava ve cevap dilek\u00e7elerinde hi\u00e7 delil belirtmeyen, \u00f6n inceleme a\u015famas\u0131nda da delillerini sunmayan veya toplanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in gerekli i\u015flemleri yapmayan taraflar\u0131n tahkikat a\u015famas\u0131nda delil bildirme haklar\u0131n\u0131n oldu\u011fu \u015feklinde anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. 145. maddenin gerek\u00e7esinde, \u201cuygulamada, davalar\u0131n uzamas\u0131n\u0131n temel sebeplerinden birinin de gereksiz yere yeni delil sunulmas\u0131 ve bu konuda taraflara verilen s\u00fcrelere uyulmamas\u0131 oldu\u011funun bilindi\u011fi, maddenin ilk f\u0131kras\u0131yla, Kanunda belirtilen s\u00fcrelerden sonra, davada yeni delil sunulmas\u0131n\u0131n yasak oldu\u011funun kural olarak benimsendi\u011fi, fakat iki istisnan\u0131n kabul edildi\u011fi, bunun i\u00e7in; yeni delil sunulmas\u0131 talebinin yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 geciktirme amac\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131mamas\u0131 veya delilin s\u00fcresinde sunulmamas\u0131n\u0131n ilgili taraf\u0131n kusuru d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda bir sebebe dayanmas\u0131 halinde, h\u00e2kimin gerek\u00e7esini de belirtmek \u015fart\u0131yla, yeni delil sunulmas\u0131na izin verebilece\u011fi, bu \u015fekilde delil sunma kural\u0131na istisna getirilmesinin hukuki dinlenme hakk\u0131n\u0131n tabii bir sonucu oldu\u011fu\u201d belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

8. T\u00fcm bu hususlar birlikte de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde; 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un sistemati\u011fi i\u00e7inde; tahkikat a\u015famas\u0131na ge\u00e7ilmezden evvel taraflar\u0131n uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klar\u0131n \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fc i\u00e7in ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fckleri delillerin daha i\u015fin ba\u015f\u0131nda belirlenerek tahkikat\u0131n etkin bir \u015fekilde yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n ama\u00e7land\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Yarg\u0131laman\u0131n etkin ve makul bir s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde bitirilmesi i\u00e7in delil g\u00f6sterilmesi dilek\u00e7elerin teatisi (dava, cevap, cevaba cevap ve ikinci cevap) a\u015famas\u0131na hasredilmi\u015ftir. Buna g\u00f6re, dilek\u00e7elerin teatisi a\u015famas\u0131nda herhangi bir delil bildirmeyen davac\u0131 veya daval\u0131ya \u00f6n inceleme duru\u015fmas\u0131nda delillerini bildirmesi i\u00e7in yeni bir s\u00fcre verilmesine imk\u00e2n bulunmamaktad\u0131r (Yarg\u0131tay Hukuk Genel Kurulunun 16.11.2016 tarihli ve 2014\/2-1226 E., 2016\/1057 K. say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131).<\/p>\n

9. Dava dosyas\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesinde; davac\u0131 vekilinin dava dilek\u00e7esinde tan\u0131k deliline dayanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, Mahkemece 28.05.2019 tarihli duru\u015fmas\u0131nda 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 140. maddesinin be\u015finci f\u0131kras\u0131na dayal\u0131 tan\u0131k bildiren taraf\u0131n, tan\u0131k dinletmek istedi\u011fi vak\u0131ay\u0131 ve dinlenilmesi istenen tan\u0131klar\u0131n ad\u0131 ve soyad\u0131 ile tebli\u011fe elveri\u015fli adreslerini i\u00e7eren muhatap say\u0131s\u0131ndan bir suret fazla dilek\u00e7eyle bildirmesi i\u00e7in 2 haftal\u0131k kesin s\u00fcre verildi\u011fi ve bu s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde davac\u0131 vekilinin tan\u0131k isim ve adreslerini bildirdi\u011fi ve bildirilen tan\u0131klar\u0131n beyanlar\u0131 h\u00fckme esas al\u0131narak davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne karar verildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

10. Yukar\u0131da belirtilen yasal d\u00fczenlemeler dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, dava dilek\u00e7esinde tan\u0131k deliline dayanmayan, sonradan delil g\u00f6sterilebilmesi i\u00e7in 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 145. maddesinde belirtilen istisnai hallerin mevcudiyetini de ileri s\u00fcrmeyen davac\u0131 vekilinin \u00f6n inceleme a\u015famas\u0131ndan sonra bildirdi\u011fi tan\u0131klar\u0131n dinlenmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n

11. O halde Mahkemece; davac\u0131 vekilince s\u00fcresinde ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclmeyen ve bildirilmeyen tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131 h\u00fckme esas al\u0131narak davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 olup, Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bu y\u00f6ne ili\u015fen kanun yarar\u0131n\u0131n temyiz talebinin kabul\u00fc gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

C. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n adli yard\u0131ma ili\u015fkin kanun yarar\u0131na temyiz itiraz\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesinde;<\/p>\n

1. Adli yard\u0131mdan yararlanacak ki\u015filer 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 334. maddesinde say\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. An\u0131lan maddenin birinci bendine g\u00f6re ancak ger\u00e7ek ki\u015filer, ikinci bendine g\u00f6re de ancak kamuya yararl\u0131 dernek ve vak\u0131flar adli yard\u0131mdan yararlanabilir. Kamuya yararl\u0131 dernek ve vak\u0131flar d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki t\u00fczel ki\u015filerin adli yard\u0131mdan yararlanmalar\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n

2. O halde Mahkemece; adli yard\u0131m talebinde bulunan davac\u0131n\u0131n, ticaret \u015firketi olup adli yard\u0131mdan yararlanmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan adli yard\u0131m talebinin reddine karar verilmesi gerekirken kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 olup, Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bu y\u00f6ne ili\u015fen kanun yarar\u0131na temyiz talebinin kabul\u00fc gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

SONU\u00c7 : A\u00e7\u0131klanan sebeplerle;<\/p>\n

Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 363. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131na dayal\u0131 kanun yarar\u0131na temyiz istemlerinin kabul\u00fcyle karar\u0131n sonuca etkili olmamak \u00fczere KANUN YARARINA BOZULMASINA, Dava dosyas\u0131n\u0131n \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesine, karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6nderilmesine, 13.05.2024 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n

kazanci.com<\/p>\n

\u200bDaval\u0131 Taraf\u0131ndan \u00d6deme Emrine S\u00fcresinde Yap\u0131lan Yetki \u0130tiraz\u0131n\u0131n Mahkeme Taraf\u0131ndan \u00d6ncelikle De\u011ferlendirilmesi ve Yetki \u0130tiraz\u0131n\u0131n Yerinde Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 Anla\u015f\u0131l\u0131rsa Esas\u0131n \u0130ncelenmesi Gerekirken Yetki \u0130tiraz\u0131 Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden Herhangi Bir De\u011ferlendirme Yap\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n Karar Verilmesinin Usul ve Yasaya Ayk\u0131r\u0131 Bulundu\u011fu\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n

Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

T.C. YARGITAY 3. HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130 E. 2024\/247 K. 2024\/1649 T. 13.5.2024 TAM\u0130RAT VE TAD\u0130LAT \u0130\u015eLEMLER\u0130 KAR\u015eILI\u011eI BEDEL\u0130N \u00d6DENMEMES\u0130 NEDEN\u0130YLE BA\u015eLATILAN \u0130CRA TAK\u0130B\u0130NE \u0130T\u0130RAZIN \u0130PTAL\u0130 ( Daval\u0131 Taraf\u0131ndan \u00d6deme Emrine S\u00fcresinde Yap\u0131lan Yetki \u0130tiraz\u0131n\u0131n Mahkeme Taraf\u0131ndan \u00d6ncelikle De\u011ferlendirilmesi ve Yetki \u0130tiraz\u0131n\u0131n Yerinde Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 Anla\u015f\u0131l\u0131rsa Esas\u0131n \u0130ncelenmesi Gerekirken Yetki \u0130tiraz\u0131 Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden Herhangi Bir De\u011ferlendirme Yap\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n Karar Verilmesinin Usul ve Yasaya Ayk\u0131r\u0131 Bulundu\u011fu ) TANIK DEL\u0130L\u0130 ( Dava Dilek\u00e7esinde Tan\u0131k Deliline Dayanmayan Davac\u0131n\u0131n 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu\u2019nun 145. Maddesi Uyar\u0131nca Yasal S\u00fcrede \u0130leri S\u00fcrmedi\u011fi Tan\u0131k Deliline Dayanarak H\u00fck\u00fcm Kurulmas\u0131 M\u00fcmk\u00fcn Olmay\u0131p Mahkemece S\u00fcresinde Bildirilmeyen Tan\u0131klar\u0131n Beyanlar\u0131na Dayan\u0131larak Karar Verilmesinin \u0130sabetsizli\u011fi ) ADL\u0130 YARDIM ( Ticaret \u015eirketlerinin Adli Yard\u0131mdan Yararlanamayaca\u011f\u0131\/Davac\u0131 \u015eirketin Adli Yard\u0131m Talebinin Kabul Edilmesinin Usul ve Yasaya Ayk\u0131r\u0131 Bulundu\u011fu ) 2004\/m.50,67 6098\/m.89 6100\/m.115,119,145,334 \u00d6ZET: Dava, davac\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131n\u0131n evinde yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 tadilat bedellerinin kendisine \u00f6denmemesi nedeniyle ba\u015flat\u0131lan takibe itiraz\u0131n iptali istemine ili\u015fkin olup, kanun yarar\u0131na temyiz a\u015famas\u0131nda uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k, \u00f6deme emrine itirazda ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen yetki itiraz\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilip de\u011ferlendirilmeyece\u011fi, davac\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcresinde dayanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tan\u0131k deliline dayanarak davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilip verilmeyece\u011fi ve davac\u0131 \u015firketin adli yard\u0131mdan yararlan\u0131p yararlanmayaca\u011f\u0131 noktas\u0131nda toplanmaktad\u0131r. Dava dosyas\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesinde; davac\u0131 vekilinin dava dilek\u00e7esinde tan\u0131k deliline dayanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, Mahkemece 28.05.2019 tarihli duru\u015fmas\u0131nda 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 140. maddesinin be\u015finci f\u0131kras\u0131na dayal\u0131 tan\u0131k bildiren taraf\u0131n, tan\u0131k …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-33375","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nTAM\u0130RAT VE TAD\u0130LAT \u0130\u015eLEMLER\u0130 KAR\u015eILI\u011eI BEDEL\u0130N \u00d6DENMEMES\u0130 NEDEN\u0130YLE BA\u015eLATILAN \u0130CRA TAK\u0130B\u0130NE \u0130T\u0130RAZIN \u0130PTAL\u0130 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/tamirat-ve-tadilat-islemleri-karsiligi-bedelin-odenmemesi-nedeniyle-baslatilan-icra-takibine-itirazin-iptali\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"TAM\u0130RAT VE TAD\u0130LAT \u0130\u015eLEMLER\u0130 KAR\u015eILI\u011eI BEDEL\u0130N \u00d6DENMEMES\u0130 NEDEN\u0130YLE BA\u015eLATILAN \u0130CRA TAK\u0130B\u0130NE \u0130T\u0130RAZIN \u0130PTAL\u0130\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"T.C. YARGITAY 3. HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130 E. 2024\/247 K. 2024\/1649 T. 13.5.2024 TAM\u0130RAT VE TAD\u0130LAT \u0130\u015eLEMLER\u0130 KAR\u015eILI\u011eI BEDEL\u0130N \u00d6DENMEMES\u0130 NEDEN\u0130YLE BA\u015eLATILAN \u0130CRA TAK\u0130B\u0130NE \u0130T\u0130RAZIN \u0130PTAL\u0130 ( Daval\u0131 Taraf\u0131ndan \u00d6deme Emrine S\u00fcresinde Yap\u0131lan Yetki \u0130tiraz\u0131n\u0131n Mahkeme Taraf\u0131ndan \u00d6ncelikle De\u011ferlendirilmesi ve Yetki \u0130tiraz\u0131n\u0131n Yerinde Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 Anla\u015f\u0131l\u0131rsa Esas\u0131n \u0130ncelenmesi Gerekirken Yetki \u0130tiraz\u0131 Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden Herhangi Bir De\u011ferlendirme Yap\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n Karar Verilmesinin Usul ve Yasaya Ayk\u0131r\u0131 Bulundu\u011fu ) TANIK DEL\u0130L\u0130 ( Dava Dilek\u00e7esinde Tan\u0131k Deliline Dayanmayan Davac\u0131n\u0131n 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu\u2019nun 145. Maddesi Uyar\u0131nca Yasal S\u00fcrede \u0130leri S\u00fcrmedi\u011fi Tan\u0131k Deliline Dayanarak H\u00fck\u00fcm Kurulmas\u0131 M\u00fcmk\u00fcn Olmay\u0131p Mahkemece S\u00fcresinde Bildirilmeyen Tan\u0131klar\u0131n Beyanlar\u0131na Dayan\u0131larak Karar Verilmesinin \u0130sabetsizli\u011fi ) ADL\u0130 YARDIM ( Ticaret \u015eirketlerinin Adli Yard\u0131mdan Yararlanamayaca\u011f\u0131\/Davac\u0131 \u015eirketin Adli Yard\u0131m Talebinin Kabul Edilmesinin Usul ve Yasaya Ayk\u0131r\u0131 Bulundu\u011fu ) 2004\/m.50,67 6098\/m.89 6100\/m.115,119,145,334 \u00d6ZET: Dava, davac\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131n\u0131n evinde yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 tadilat bedellerinin kendisine \u00f6denmemesi nedeniyle ba\u015flat\u0131lan takibe itiraz\u0131n iptali istemine ili\u015fkin olup, kanun yarar\u0131na temyiz a\u015famas\u0131nda uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k, \u00f6deme emrine itirazda ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen yetki itiraz\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilip de\u011ferlendirilmeyece\u011fi, davac\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcresinde dayanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tan\u0131k deliline dayanarak davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilip verilmeyece\u011fi ve davac\u0131 \u015firketin adli yard\u0131mdan yararlan\u0131p yararlanmayaca\u011f\u0131 noktas\u0131nda toplanmaktad\u0131r. Dava dosyas\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesinde; davac\u0131 vekilinin dava dilek\u00e7esinde tan\u0131k deliline dayanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, Mahkemece 28.05.2019 tarihli duru\u015fmas\u0131nda 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 140. maddesinin be\u015finci f\u0131kras\u0131na dayal\u0131 tan\u0131k bildiren taraf\u0131n, tan\u0131k …\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/tamirat-ve-tadilat-islemleri-karsiligi-bedelin-odenmemesi-nedeniyle-baslatilan-icra-takibine-itirazin-iptali\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-02-18T12:05:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u043e \u0430\u0432\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043e\u043c\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"20 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/tamirat-ve-tadilat-islemleri-karsiligi-bedelin-odenmemesi-nedeniyle-baslatilan-icra-takibine-itirazin-iptali\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/tamirat-ve-tadilat-islemleri-karsiligi-bedelin-odenmemesi-nedeniyle-baslatilan-icra-takibine-itirazin-iptali\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\"},\"headline\":\"TAM\u0130RAT VE TAD\u0130LAT \u0130\u015eLEMLER\u0130 KAR\u015eILI\u011eI BEDEL\u0130N \u00d6DENMEMES\u0130 NEDEN\u0130YLE BA\u015eLATILAN \u0130CRA TAK\u0130B\u0130NE \u0130T\u0130RAZIN \u0130PTAL\u0130\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-02-18T12:05:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/tamirat-ve-tadilat-islemleri-karsiligi-bedelin-odenmemesi-nedeniyle-baslatilan-icra-takibine-itirazin-iptali\/\"},\"wordCount\":4026,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Hukuki Haberler\"],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/tamirat-ve-tadilat-islemleri-karsiligi-bedelin-odenmemesi-nedeniyle-baslatilan-icra-takibine-itirazin-iptali\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/tamirat-ve-tadilat-islemleri-karsiligi-bedelin-odenmemesi-nedeniyle-baslatilan-icra-takibine-itirazin-iptali\/\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/tamirat-ve-tadilat-islemleri-karsiligi-bedelin-odenmemesi-nedeniyle-baslatilan-icra-takibine-itirazin-iptali\/\",\"name\":\"TAM\u0130RAT VE TAD\u0130LAT \u0130\u015eLEMLER\u0130 KAR\u015eILI\u011eI BEDEL\u0130N \u00d6DENMEMES\u0130 NEDEN\u0130YLE BA\u015eLATILAN \u0130CRA TAK\u0130B\u0130NE \u0130T\u0130RAZIN \u0130PTAL\u0130 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2025-02-18T12:05:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/tamirat-ve-tadilat-islemleri-karsiligi-bedelin-odenmemesi-nedeniyle-baslatilan-icra-takibine-itirazin-iptali\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/tamirat-ve-tadilat-islemleri-karsiligi-bedelin-odenmemesi-nedeniyle-baslatilan-icra-takibine-itirazin-iptali\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/tamirat-ve-tadilat-islemleri-karsiligi-bedelin-odenmemesi-nedeniyle-baslatilan-icra-takibine-itirazin-iptali\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"TAM\u0130RAT VE TAD\u0130LAT \u0130\u015eLEMLER\u0130 KAR\u015eILI\u011eI BEDEL\u0130N \u00d6DENMEMES\u0130 NEDEN\u0130YLE BA\u015eLATILAN \u0130CRA TAK\u0130B\u0130NE \u0130T\u0130RAZIN \u0130PTAL\u0130\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"description\":\"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"width\":1080,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\",\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net\"],\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/author\/hukukihabernet\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"TAM\u0130RAT VE TAD\u0130LAT \u0130\u015eLEMLER\u0130 KAR\u015eILI\u011eI BEDEL\u0130N \u00d6DENMEMES\u0130 NEDEN\u0130YLE BA\u015eLATILAN \u0130CRA TAK\u0130B\u0130NE \u0130T\u0130RAZIN \u0130PTAL\u0130 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/tamirat-ve-tadilat-islemleri-karsiligi-bedelin-odenmemesi-nedeniyle-baslatilan-icra-takibine-itirazin-iptali\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"TAM\u0130RAT VE TAD\u0130LAT \u0130\u015eLEMLER\u0130 KAR\u015eILI\u011eI BEDEL\u0130N \u00d6DENMEMES\u0130 NEDEN\u0130YLE BA\u015eLATILAN \u0130CRA TAK\u0130B\u0130NE \u0130T\u0130RAZIN \u0130PTAL\u0130","og_description":"T.C. YARGITAY 3. HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130 E. 2024\/247 K. 2024\/1649 T. 13.5.2024 TAM\u0130RAT VE TAD\u0130LAT \u0130\u015eLEMLER\u0130 KAR\u015eILI\u011eI BEDEL\u0130N \u00d6DENMEMES\u0130 NEDEN\u0130YLE BA\u015eLATILAN \u0130CRA TAK\u0130B\u0130NE \u0130T\u0130RAZIN \u0130PTAL\u0130 ( Daval\u0131 Taraf\u0131ndan \u00d6deme Emrine S\u00fcresinde Yap\u0131lan Yetki \u0130tiraz\u0131n\u0131n Mahkeme Taraf\u0131ndan \u00d6ncelikle De\u011ferlendirilmesi ve Yetki \u0130tiraz\u0131n\u0131n Yerinde Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 Anla\u015f\u0131l\u0131rsa Esas\u0131n \u0130ncelenmesi Gerekirken Yetki \u0130tiraz\u0131 Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden Herhangi Bir De\u011ferlendirme Yap\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n Karar Verilmesinin Usul ve Yasaya Ayk\u0131r\u0131 Bulundu\u011fu ) TANIK DEL\u0130L\u0130 ( Dava Dilek\u00e7esinde Tan\u0131k Deliline Dayanmayan Davac\u0131n\u0131n 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu\u2019nun 145. Maddesi Uyar\u0131nca Yasal S\u00fcrede \u0130leri S\u00fcrmedi\u011fi Tan\u0131k Deliline Dayanarak H\u00fck\u00fcm Kurulmas\u0131 M\u00fcmk\u00fcn Olmay\u0131p Mahkemece S\u00fcresinde Bildirilmeyen Tan\u0131klar\u0131n Beyanlar\u0131na Dayan\u0131larak Karar Verilmesinin \u0130sabetsizli\u011fi ) ADL\u0130 YARDIM ( Ticaret \u015eirketlerinin Adli Yard\u0131mdan Yararlanamayaca\u011f\u0131\/Davac\u0131 \u015eirketin Adli Yard\u0131m Talebinin Kabul Edilmesinin Usul ve Yasaya Ayk\u0131r\u0131 Bulundu\u011fu ) 2004\/m.50,67 6098\/m.89 6100\/m.115,119,145,334 \u00d6ZET: Dava, davac\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131n\u0131n evinde yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 tadilat bedellerinin kendisine \u00f6denmemesi nedeniyle ba\u015flat\u0131lan takibe itiraz\u0131n iptali istemine ili\u015fkin olup, kanun yarar\u0131na temyiz a\u015famas\u0131nda uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k, \u00f6deme emrine itirazda ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen yetki itiraz\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilip de\u011ferlendirilmeyece\u011fi, davac\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcresinde dayanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tan\u0131k deliline dayanarak davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilip verilmeyece\u011fi ve davac\u0131 \u015firketin adli yard\u0131mdan yararlan\u0131p yararlanmayaca\u011f\u0131 noktas\u0131nda toplanmaktad\u0131r. Dava dosyas\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesinde; davac\u0131 vekilinin dava dilek\u00e7esinde tan\u0131k deliline dayanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, Mahkemece 28.05.2019 tarihli duru\u015fmas\u0131nda 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 140. maddesinin be\u015finci f\u0131kras\u0131na dayal\u0131 tan\u0131k bildiren taraf\u0131n, tan\u0131k …","og_url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/tamirat-ve-tadilat-islemleri-karsiligi-bedelin-odenmemesi-nedeniyle-baslatilan-icra-takibine-itirazin-iptali\/","og_site_name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","article_published_time":"2025-02-18T12:05:00+00:00","author":"Hukuki Haber.net","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u043e \u0430\u0432\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043e\u043c":"Hukuki Haber.net","\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"20 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/tamirat-ve-tadilat-islemleri-karsiligi-bedelin-odenmemesi-nedeniyle-baslatilan-icra-takibine-itirazin-iptali\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/tamirat-ve-tadilat-islemleri-karsiligi-bedelin-odenmemesi-nedeniyle-baslatilan-icra-takibine-itirazin-iptali\/"},"author":{"name":"Hukuki Haber.net","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822"},"headline":"TAM\u0130RAT VE TAD\u0130LAT \u0130\u015eLEMLER\u0130 KAR\u015eILI\u011eI BEDEL\u0130N \u00d6DENMEMES\u0130 NEDEN\u0130YLE BA\u015eLATILAN \u0130CRA TAK\u0130B\u0130NE \u0130T\u0130RAZIN \u0130PTAL\u0130","datePublished":"2025-02-18T12:05:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/tamirat-ve-tadilat-islemleri-karsiligi-bedelin-odenmemesi-nedeniyle-baslatilan-icra-takibine-itirazin-iptali\/"},"wordCount":4026,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Hukuki Haberler"],"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/tamirat-ve-tadilat-islemleri-karsiligi-bedelin-odenmemesi-nedeniyle-baslatilan-icra-takibine-itirazin-iptali\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/tamirat-ve-tadilat-islemleri-karsiligi-bedelin-odenmemesi-nedeniyle-baslatilan-icra-takibine-itirazin-iptali\/","url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/tamirat-ve-tadilat-islemleri-karsiligi-bedelin-odenmemesi-nedeniyle-baslatilan-icra-takibine-itirazin-iptali\/","name":"TAM\u0130RAT VE TAD\u0130LAT \u0130\u015eLEMLER\u0130 KAR\u015eILI\u011eI BEDEL\u0130N \u00d6DENMEMES\u0130 NEDEN\u0130YLE BA\u015eLATILAN \u0130CRA TAK\u0130B\u0130NE \u0130T\u0130RAZIN \u0130PTAL\u0130 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-02-18T12:05:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/tamirat-ve-tadilat-islemleri-karsiligi-bedelin-odenmemesi-nedeniyle-baslatilan-icra-takibine-itirazin-iptali\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/tamirat-ve-tadilat-islemleri-karsiligi-bedelin-odenmemesi-nedeniyle-baslatilan-icra-takibine-itirazin-iptali\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/tamirat-ve-tadilat-islemleri-karsiligi-bedelin-odenmemesi-nedeniyle-baslatilan-icra-takibine-itirazin-iptali\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"TAM\u0130RAT VE TAD\u0130LAT \u0130\u015eLEMLER\u0130 KAR\u015eILI\u011eI BEDEL\u0130N \u00d6DENMEMES\u0130 NEDEN\u0130YLE BA\u015eLATILAN \u0130CRA TAK\u0130B\u0130NE \u0130T\u0130RAZIN \u0130PTAL\u0130"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#website","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","description":"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#organization","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","contentUrl":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","width":1080,"height":1080,"caption":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822","name":"Hukuki Haber.net","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Hukuki Haber.net"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net"],"url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/author\/hukukihabernet\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33375","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=33375"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33375\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=33375"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=33375"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=33375"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}