T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
AZ\u0130ZE ACAR BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2022\/29458)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 31\/10\/2024<\/p>\n
R.G. Tarih ve Say\u0131: 21\/1\/2025 – 32789<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130rfan F\u0130DAN<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Muhterem \u0130NCE<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Y\u00fcksel G\u00dcNARSLAN<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Azize ACAR<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Mazlum DEM\u0130RBA\u011e<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru; haks\u0131z yakalama ve g\u00f6zalt\u0131 koruma tedbirleri nedeniyle a\u00e7\u0131lan tazminat davas\u0131nda davan\u0131n sonucuna etkili iddian\u0131n kararda kar\u015f\u0131lanmamas\u0131 nedeniyle gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n, yakalama sebeplerinin bildirilmemesi nedeniyle de ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. \u0130zmir Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) 14\/2\/2018 tarihinde sokakta yanm\u0131\u015f bir kad\u0131n cesedinin sokakta bulunmas\u0131 \u00fczerine soru\u015fturma ba\u015flatm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. PKK\/KCK silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne yak\u0131n baz\u0131 yay\u0131n organlar\u0131nda yap\u0131lan haberlere g\u00f6re N.K. isimli kad\u0131n, \u00f6rg\u00fct lideri Abdullah \u00d6calan’\u0131n 15\/2\/1999 tarihinde Kenya’da yakalanarak \u00fclkeye getirilmesini protesto etmek amac\u0131yla kendini yakm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
4. Soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda N.K. ile ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 ki\u015filerden oldu\u011fu de\u011ferlendirilen ba\u015fvurucu, Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n talimat\u0131 ile 14\/2\/2018 tarihinde g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn ba\u015fvurucunun ikametg\u00e2h\u0131nda arama yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve baz\u0131 dijital materyale el konulmu\u015ftur. Arama ve g\u00f6zalt\u0131 i\u015flemlerine ili\u015fkin Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k talimat yaz\u0131s\u0131nda ve kolluk g\u00f6revlileri taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen Yakalama ve G\u00f6zalt\u0131na Alma Tutana\u011f\u0131’nda ba\u015fvurucuya hangi su\u00e7un isnat edildi\u011fi belirtilmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Kolluk g\u00f6revlileri taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen 26\/2\/2018 tarihli Avukat G\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme Tutana\u011f\u0131’nda yakalama nedeni olarak PKK\/KCK ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc propagandas\u0131 yapma su\u00e7u g\u00f6sterilmi\u015ftir. Ayn\u0131 tarihte ba\u015fvurucunun kollukta ifadesi al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u0130fade Tutana\u011f\u0131’n\u0131n isnat edilen su\u00e7 b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde “PKK\/KCK ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn propagandas\u0131n\u0131 yapma, PKK\/KCK ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc ad\u0131na faaliyetlerde bulunma” ifadelerine yer verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. Ba\u015fvurucu 26\/2\/2018 tarihli ifadesinde di\u011ferlerinin yan\u0131 s\u0131ra N.K.n\u0131n yanarak \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcne, kendisine ait cep telefonunda tespit edilen ve \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc \u00f6v\u00fcc\u00fc nitelikte oldu\u011fu de\u011ferlendirilen \u015fark\u0131 ve mar\u015flara ili\u015fkin sorular\u0131 yan\u0131tlam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu bu kapsamda N.K.y\u0131 tan\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, olay gecesi evlerinin \u00f6n\u00fcnde bir yang\u0131n \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ara\u00e7lar\u0131n yand\u0131\u011f\u0131 zann\u0131yla yang\u0131na m\u00fcdahale ederek yang\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6nd\u00fcrd\u00fcklerini, sonras\u0131nda yanan \u015feyin bir kad\u0131n oldu\u011funu anlad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade etmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu ayr\u0131ca bir st\u00fcdyoda foto\u011fraf\u00e7\u0131 olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, telefonunda bulunan \u015fark\u0131 ve mar\u015flar\u0131n i\u015fi gere\u011fi fon m\u00fczi\u011fi olarak kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve m\u00fc\u015fterilerin g\u00f6nderdi\u011fi m\u00fczik par\u00e7alar\u0131 oldu\u011funu beyan etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, ba\u015fvurucuyu silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc propagandas\u0131 yapma su\u00e7undan hakk\u0131nda adli kontrol uygulanmas\u0131 talebiyle \u0130zmir 3. Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fine (H\u00e2kimlik) 28\/2\/2018 tarihinde sevk etmi\u015ftir. H\u00e2kimlik sorgusunun ard\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda belirli yerlere d\u00fczenli olarak ba\u015fvurma \u015feklindeki adli kontrol tedbirinin uygulanmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, 9\/7\/2018 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda N.K.n\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc olay\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne bilerek ve isteyerek yard\u0131m etme, ba\u015fkas\u0131n\u0131 intihara y\u00f6nlendirme su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan ek kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karar vermi\u015ftir. Kararda ba\u015fvurucunun g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin bir a\u00e7\u0131klama yapmam\u0131\u015f; g\u00f6zalt\u0131 koruma tedbiri nedeniyle tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131labilece\u011fine ili\u015fkin bir ifadeye de yer vermemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc propagandas\u0131 yapma su\u00e7undan cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 talebiyle 10\/7\/2018 tarihinde iddianame d\u00fczenlemi\u015ftir. \u0130ddianame, temel olarak ba\u015fvurucunun cep telefonunda tespit edilen 660 ses dosyas\u0131ndan 5’inin ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fc \u00f6v\u00fcc\u00fc nitelikte \u015fark\u0131 ve mar\u015f oldu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki kolluk tespitine dayanmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
10. \u0130ddianamenin kabul\u00fc ile ba\u015flayan ceza davas\u0131 \u0130zmir 16. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinde g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Yarg\u0131lama neticesinde 7\/3\/2019 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucunun isnat edilen su\u00e7tan beraatine karar verilmi\u015ftir. \u0130stinaf incelemesinden ge\u00e7en beraat karar\u0131 21\/10\/2020 tarihinde kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
11. S\u00f6z konusu beraat karar\u0131n\u0131n kesinle\u015fmesi \u00fczerine ba\u015fvurucu, silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc propagandas\u0131 yapma su\u00e7undan yakalan\u0131p g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu su\u00e7tan a\u00e7\u0131lan kamu davas\u0131n\u0131n beraat ile sonu\u00e7land\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan ederek haks\u0131z g\u00f6zalt\u0131 tedbiri nedeniyle u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131 maddi ve manevi zarar\u0131n giderilmesi amac\u0131yla \u0130zmir 22. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi (A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi\/Mahkeme) nezdinde tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu 28\/10\/2020 tarihli dava dilek\u00e7esi ile 10.000 TL maddi, 10.000 TL manevi tazminat talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
12. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi ba\u015fvurucunun beraat ile sonu\u00e7lanan ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131na konu su\u00e7a ili\u015fkin olarak g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, soru\u015fturma evresinde uygulanan g\u00f6zalt\u0131 koruma tedbirinin ek kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karara konu silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne bilerek ve isteyerek yard\u0131m etme, ba\u015fkas\u0131n\u0131 intihara y\u00f6nlendirme su\u00e7lar\u0131na ili\u015fkin oldu\u011funu kabul etmi\u015ftir. Bununla birlikte A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi, ek kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair kararda ba\u015fvurucunun hangi tarihlerde g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131na ve tazminat hakk\u0131na sahip oldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin herhangi bir ifadenin yer almamas\u0131, Yakalama ve G\u00f6zalt\u0131na Alma Tutana\u011f\u0131’nda su\u00e7 vasf\u0131n\u0131n belirtilmemesi ve an\u0131lan karar\u0131n ba\u015fvurucuya tebli\u011f edilmemesi nedeniyle tazminat davas\u0131n\u0131n ek kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karara ili\u015fkin oldu\u011funu kabul etmi\u015ftir. Davac\u0131 vekilinin yarg\u0131lama a\u015famas\u0131ndaki beyanlar\u0131na istinaden davan\u0131n \u0131slah\u0131n\u0131 gerektiren hukuki bir durum olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 de\u011ferlendiren A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi, ba\u015fvurucunun tazminat davas\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcyle ba\u015fvurucuya 677,09 TL maddi ve 1.500 TL manevi tazminat \u00f6denmesine 21\/10\/2021 tarihinde karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
13. Ba\u015fvurucu ve kat\u0131lan kurum vekili s\u00f6z konusu karara kar\u015f\u0131 istinaf kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
14. \u0130zmir B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 14. Ceza Dairesi (\u0130stinaf Mahkemesi) ilk derece mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n h\u00fck\u00fcm k\u0131sm\u0131na “Davac\u0131n\u0131n yasal ko\u015fullar\u0131 olu\u015fmayan maddi ve manevi tazminat taleplerinin REDD\u0130NE” \u015feklindeki ifade eklenmek suretiyle d\u00fczeltilerek istinaf ba\u015fvurular\u0131n\u0131n esastan reddine 20\/1\/2022 tarihinde kesin olarak karar vermi\u015f; kararda davac\u0131n\u0131n tazminat talebine konu ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc propagandas\u0131 yapma su\u00e7u ile ilgili olarak g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, g\u00f6zalt\u0131 evrak\u0131na g\u00f6re i\u015flemin \u015f\u00fcpheli ceset nedeniyle ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011fini bu nedenle tazminat ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015ftir. Bununla birlikte A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin ek kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karar\u0131n esas al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki de\u011ferlendirmesine ili\u015fkin herhangi bir a\u00e7\u0131klamaya yer vermemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
15. Ba\u015fvurucu, nihai karar\u0131 31\/1\/2022 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra 25\/2\/2022 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
16. Komisyon, adli yard\u0131m talebinin kabul\u00fc ile ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
A. Gerek\u00e7eli Karar Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
17. Ba\u015fvurucu; haks\u0131z ve hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, yarg\u0131sal s\u00fcre\u00e7te \u00f6nce kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, sonras\u0131nda ise beraat karar\u0131 verildi\u011fini, beraat karar\u0131n\u0131 takiben a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 tazminat davas\u0131n\u0131n hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak reddedildi\u011fini beyan ederek ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
18. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde, yap\u0131lacak de\u011ferlendirmede Anayasa ve mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmleri do\u011frultusunda somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
19. Ba\u015fvurucunun iddialar\u0131n\u0131n adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki gerek\u00e7eli hakk\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden incelenmesi gerekti\u011fi de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
20. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
21. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 36. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131 g\u00fcvencesini de kapsamaktad\u0131r (daha geni\u015f de\u011ferlendirme i\u00e7in bkz. Abdullah Top\u00e7u, B. No: 2014\/8868, 19\/4\/2017, \u00a7 75). Nitekim Anayasa’n\u0131n 141. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda \u201cB\u00fct\u00fcn mahkemelerin her t\u00fcrl\u00fc kararlar\u0131 gerek\u00e7eli olarak yaz\u0131l\u0131r.\u201d denilerek mahkemelere kararlar\u0131n\u0131 gerek\u00e7eli yazma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc y\u00fcklenmi\u015ftir. Mahkemelerin an\u0131lan y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, yarg\u0131lamada ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen her t\u00fcrl\u00fc iddia ve savunmaya karar gerek\u00e7esinde ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 yan\u0131t vermesi gerekti\u011fi \u015feklinde anla\u015f\u0131lamaz ancak mahkemeler, kendilerine sunulan t\u00fcm iddialara yan\u0131t vermek zorunda de\u011filse de (Yasemin Ek\u015fi, B. No: 2013\/5486, 4\/12\/2013, \u00a7 56) mahkemelerin davan\u0131n esas sorunlar\u0131n\u0131 inceledikleri gerek\u00e7eli karardan anla\u015f\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. Bir kararda tam olarak hangi unsurlar\u0131n bulunmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi davan\u0131n niteli\u011fine ve \u015fartlar\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r. Muhakeme s\u0131ras\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131k ve somut bir bi\u00e7imde \u00f6ne s\u00fcr\u00fclen iddia ve savunmalar\u0131n davan\u0131n sonucuna etkili, ba\u015fka bir deyi\u015fle davan\u0131n sonucunu de\u011fi\u015ftirebilecek nitelikte olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde davayla do\u011frudan ilgili olan bu hususlara mahkemelerce makul bir gerek\u00e7e ile yan\u0131t verilmesi gerekir (Sencer Ba\u015fat ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2013\/7800, 18\/6\/2014, \u00a7 35). Aksi bir tutumla mahkemenin davan\u0131n sonucuna etkili oldu\u011funu kabul etti\u011fi bir husus hakk\u0131nda ilgili ve yeterli bir yan\u0131t vermemesi veya yan\u0131t vermeyi gerektiren usul veya esasa dair iddialar\u0131 cevaps\u0131z b\u0131rakmas\u0131 hak ihlaline neden olabilecektir (Sencer Ba\u015fat ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 39).<\/p>\n
22. Somut olayda A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi tazminat davas\u0131na konu yakalama ve g\u00f6zalt\u0131 koruma tedbirlerinin \u0130zmir 16. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi nezdinde ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn propagandas\u0131n\u0131 yapma su\u00e7undan a\u00e7\u0131lan ve beraat ile sonu\u00e7lanan ceza davas\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda uygulanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kabul etmi\u015ftir. Gerek\u00e7eli kararda, bu sonuca ula\u015f\u0131rken ba\u015fvurucuya ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc propagandas\u0131 yapma su\u00e7unun isnat edildi\u011fine dair tespitler i\u00e7eren 26\/2\/2018 tarihli Avukat G\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme Tutana\u011f\u0131 ile ayn\u0131 tarihli \u0130fade Tutana\u011f\u0131’n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin herhangi bir a\u00e7\u0131klamaya yer vermemi\u015ftir. Bununla birlikte Mahkeme, an\u0131lan tedbirlerin Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n 9\/7\/2018 tarihli ek kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 karar\u0131na konu su\u00e7lara ili\u015fkin olarak uyguland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 tespit etmi\u015f ve tazminat davas\u0131n\u0131n konusunu belirlerken 7\/3\/2019 tarihli beraat karar\u0131 yerine 9\/7\/2018 tarihli ek kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karar\u0131 esas alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (bkz. \u00a7 12).<\/p>\n
23. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi bu belirlemelerden sonra ek kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair kararda g\u00f6zalt\u0131 s\u00fcresini ve ba\u015fvurucunun tazminat hakk\u0131na sahip oldu\u011funu bildirir herhangi bir ifadenin yer almamas\u0131, Yakalama ve G\u00f6zalt\u0131na Alma Tutana\u011f\u0131’nda su\u00e7 vasf\u0131n\u0131n belirtilmemesi ve an\u0131lan karar\u0131n ba\u015fvurucuya tebli\u011f edilmemesi nedeniyle tazminat davas\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcresinde a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kabul ederek davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne karar vermi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7 12). Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla Mahkemenin k\u0131smen kabul karar\u0131n\u0131n 7\/3\/2019 tarihli beraat karar\u0131na de\u011fil 9\/7\/2018 tarihli ek kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karara dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
24. \u00d6te yandan \u0130stinaf Mahkemesi ba\u015fvurucunun tazminat talebine konu ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc propagandas\u0131 yapma su\u00e7u ile ilgili ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131nda g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, g\u00f6zalt\u0131 tedbirinin \u015f\u00fcpheli ceset nedeniyle ba\u015flat\u0131lan soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda uyguland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve bu nedenle tazminat ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015feklindeki gerek\u00e7eyle davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne ili\u015fkin h\u00fckm\u00fc davan\u0131n reddi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde d\u00fczelterek istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun kesin olarak reddine karar vermi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7 14).<\/p>\n
25. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi ve \u0130stinaf Mahkemesi kararlar\u0131 birlikte de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde her iki Mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan da tazminat davas\u0131na konu yakalama\/g\u00f6zalt\u0131 koruma tedbirlerinin beraat ile sonu\u00e7lanan ceza davas\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda de\u011fil ek kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karar ile neticelenen soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda uyguland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kabul edildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. An\u0131lan mahkeme kararlar\u0131 bu y\u00f6nden \u00f6rt\u00fc\u015fmektedir. Bununla birlikte A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi tazminat davas\u0131n\u0131n konusunu ek kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karar olarak belirlemi\u015f ve bunun nedenlerini a\u00e7\u0131k bir \u015fekilde gerek\u00e7elendirmi\u015ftir. Mahkeme 9\/7\/2018 tarihli ek kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karara y\u00f6nelik olarak ve s\u00fcresinde a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kabul etti\u011fi davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne karar vermi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7 12). \u00d6te yandan \u0130stinaf Mahkemesi, A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6zenli bir bi\u00e7imde incelenmedi\u011fi ku\u015fkusunu do\u011furacak \u015fekilde tazminat davas\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne esas al\u0131nan ek kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair kararla ilgili herhangi bir de\u011ferlendirme yapmadan, ilk derece mahkemesinin beraat ile sonu\u00e7lanan ceza davas\u0131na ili\u015fkin yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmeyi tekrar ederek Mahkemeden farkl\u0131 bir sonuca ula\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (bkz. \u00a7 14).<\/p>\n
26. \u0130stinaf Mahkemesi ek kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karar\u0131n tazminat davas\u0131n\u0131n konusu olarak kabul\u00fcn\u00fcn m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, davan\u0131n bu a\u00e7\u0131dan s\u00fcresinde a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131p a\u00e7\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin davan\u0131n konusuna ili\u015fkin belirlemesinin \u0131slah kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirilip de\u011ferlendirilemeyece\u011fi, ek kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karar\u0131n davan\u0131n konusu olarak kabul edilmesi h\u00e2linde tazminat davas\u0131n\u0131n \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fup olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususlar\u0131nda herhangi bir a\u00e7\u0131klamada bulunmadan soyut ve genel nitelikteki ifadeler ile istinaf talebinin reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131 g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda \u0130stinaf Mahkemesince yan\u0131tlanmayan bu hususlar\u0131n davan\u0131n sonucuna etkili iddialar oldu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Bu nedenle yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcreci bir b\u00fct\u00fcn olarak de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde ba\u015fvurucunun gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
27. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa’n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
B. Yakalama Nedenlerinin Bildirilmedi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
28. Ba\u015fvurucu, g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda herhangi bir su\u00e7 isnad\u0131nda bulunulmamas\u0131 nedeniyle adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki isnad\u0131 \u00f6\u011frenme hakk\u0131 ile ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde, yap\u0131lacak de\u011ferlendirmede Anayasa ve mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmleri do\u011frultusunda somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
29. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 19. maddesinin d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda, yakalanan veya tutuklanan ki\u015filere, yakalama veya tutuklama sebepleri ve haklar\u0131ndaki iddialar\u0131n bildirilece\u011fi, isnat edilen su\u00e7la ilgili olan ki\u015filere bilgi verme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc bulundu\u011fu ifade edilmi\u015ftir (AYM, E.2018\/137, K.2022\/86, 30\/6\/2022, \u00a7 284).<\/p>\n
30. Anayasa Mahkemesi, su\u00e7 isnad\u0131yla yakalanan ki\u015filerle ilgili olarak yakalama nedenlerinin veya su\u00e7lamalar\u0131n yakalama s\u0131ras\u0131nda bildirilmedi\u011fi iddias\u0131yla yap\u0131lan bireysel ba\u015fvurular bak\u0131m\u0131ndan as\u0131l dava sonu\u00e7lanmam\u0131\u015f da olsa -ilgili Yarg\u0131tay i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131na at\u0131f yaparak 4\/12\/2004 tarihli ve 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 ceza muhakemesi Kanunu’nun 141. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7ma imk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmesi gereken etkili bir hukuk yolu oldu\u011fu sonucuna varm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (Deniz \u00d6zf\u0131rat, B. No: 2013\/7929, 1\/12\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 42-54; Mehmet Bilal \u00c7olak, B. No: 2017\/25971, 30\/10\/2018, \u00a7 87).<\/p>\n
31. Somut olayda yakalama ve g\u00f6zalt\u0131na alma tedbirlerinin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrerek tazminat talebinde bulunan ba\u015fvurucu, yakalama nedenlerinin bildirilmedi\u011finden yak\u0131nmam\u0131\u015f; bu hususa ili\u015fkin tazminat talebinde bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 141. maddesinde belirtilen dava yolunun ba\u015fvurucunun durumuna uygun, telafi kabiliyetini haiz, etkili bir hukuk yolu oldu\u011fu ve bu ola\u011fan ba\u015fvuru yolu t\u00fcketilmeden yap\u0131lan bireysel ba\u015fvurunun incelenmesinin bireysel ba\u015fvurunun ikincil niteli\u011fi ile ba\u011fda\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
32. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurucunun yakaland\u0131ktan sonra yakalama nedenlerinin kendisine bildirilmedi\u011fi iddias\u0131yla ilgili olarak yarg\u0131sal ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131 t\u00fcketilmeden bireysel ba\u015fvuru yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurunun bu k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n di\u011fer kabul edilebilirlik \u015fartlar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden incelenmeksizin ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi olmas\u0131 nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M <\/p>\n
33. Ba\u015fvurucu, ihlalin tespiti ve yarg\u0131laman\u0131n yenilenmesi ile 100.000 TL maddi ve 100.000 TL manevi tazminat talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
34. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamda karar\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi yarg\u0131 mercilerince yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden yarg\u0131lama i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flatmak ve Anayasa Mahkemesini ihlal sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131ran nedenleri gideren, ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere uygun yeni karar vermektir (Mehmet Do\u011fan [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n
35. \u0130hlalin ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n yeterli giderim sa\u011flayaca\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan tazminat talebinin reddine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. 1. Gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
2. Yakalama nedenlerinin bildirilmedi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
C. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere \u0130zmir 22. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesine (E.2020\/187, K.2021\/193) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. Ba\u015fvurucunun tazminat taleplerinin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. 30.000 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinden olu\u015fan yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvurucuya \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
F. \u00d6demenin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
G. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 31\/10\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 31\/10\/2024 tarihli ve 2022\/29458 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 AZ\u0130ZE ACAR BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2022\/29458) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 31\/10\/2024 R.G. Tarih ve Say\u0131: 21\/1\/2025 – 32789 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130rfan F\u0130DAN \u00a0 \u00a0 Muhterem \u0130NCE \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : Y\u00fcksel G\u00dcNARSLAN Ba\u015fvurucu : Azize ACAR Vekili : Av. Mazlum DEM\u0130RBA\u011e \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru; haks\u0131z yakalama ve g\u00f6zalt\u0131 koruma tedbirleri nedeniyle a\u00e7\u0131lan tazminat davas\u0131nda davan\u0131n sonucuna etkili iddian\u0131n kararda kar\u015f\u0131lanmamas\u0131 nedeniyle gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n, yakalama sebeplerinin bildirilmemesi nedeniyle de ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. \u0130zmir Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) 14\/2\/2018 tarihinde sokakta yanm\u0131\u015f bir kad\u0131n cesedinin sokakta bulunmas\u0131 \u00fczerine soru\u015fturma ba\u015flatm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 3. PKK\/KCK silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne yak\u0131n baz\u0131 yay\u0131n organlar\u0131nda yap\u0131lan haberlere g\u00f6re N.K. isimli kad\u0131n, \u00f6rg\u00fct lideri Abdullah \u00d6calan’\u0131n 15\/2\/1999 tarihinde Kenya’da yakalanarak \u00fclkeye getirilmesini protesto etmek amac\u0131yla kendini yakm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 4. Soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda N.K. ile ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 ki\u015filerden oldu\u011fu de\u011ferlendirilen ba\u015fvurucu, Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n talimat\u0131 ile 14\/2\/2018 tarihinde g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn ba\u015fvurucunun ikametg\u00e2h\u0131nda arama yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve baz\u0131 dijital materyale el konulmu\u015ftur. Arama ve g\u00f6zalt\u0131 i\u015flemlerine ili\u015fkin Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k talimat yaz\u0131s\u0131nda ve kolluk g\u00f6revlileri taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen Yakalama ve …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-26494","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n