T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
BURHAN BAYRAM \u015eAH\u0130N BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/55423)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 31\/10\/2024<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130rfan F\u0130DAN<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Muhterem \u0130NCE<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6rler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Ay\u00e7a GAN\u0130DA\u011eLI DEM\u0130RC\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Denizhan HOROZG\u0130L<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Burhan Bayram \u015eAH\u0130N<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Ekrem KAYA<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc \u00fcyeli\u011fi su\u00e7uyla ilgili yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131sal yorumlar\u0131n \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclebilir olmamas\u0131 nedeniyle su\u00e7ta ve cezada kanunilik ilkesinin ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. Ba\u015fvuruda ayr\u0131ca adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n farkl\u0131 g\u00fcvencelerinin ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131 da bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
2. \u00c7ank\u0131r\u0131 Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) Fetullah\u00e7\u0131 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc\/Paralel Devlet Yap\u0131lanmas\u0131 (FET\u00d6\/PDY) \u00fcyesi oldu\u011fu \u015f\u00fcphesiyle ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda soru\u015fturma ba\u015flatm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Soru\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda etkin pi\u015fmanl\u0131k h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinden yararlanma talebinde bulunan ba\u015fvurucu, ifadesinde \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn faaliyetleri hakk\u0131nda detayl\u0131 beyanda bulunmu\u015ftur. \u00c7ank\u0131r\u0131’da \u00fcniversite e\u011fitimi ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 d\u00f6nemde cemaat yap\u0131lanmas\u0131na ait evlerde kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, eve gelen \u00f6\u011frencilerin T\u00fcrk\u00e7e ve Tarih derslerine ait sorular\u0131n\u0131 cevaplad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kendisine bu evde Burak ismi ile hitap edildi\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir. Kendisine neden Burak ismi ile hitap ettiklerini sordu\u011funda, dini bir isim o y\u00fczden Burak diyoruz \u015feklinde cevap verdiklerini a\u00e7\u0131klam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. Soru\u015fturma neticesinde Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucunun silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 talebiyle 25\/4\/2017 tarihinde iddianame d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. \u0130ddianamede \u00f6zetle; ba\u015fvurucunun 2010 y\u0131l\u0131nda \u00c7ank\u0131r\u0131 Karatekin \u00dcniversitesini kazand\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u00f6rg\u00fcte ait evlerde kald\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u00f6rg\u00fct evlerinde kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcre i\u00e7erisinde \u00f6rg\u00fctsel bilincin art\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik \u00f6rg\u00fct liderine ait kitaplar\u0131 okuma, videolar\u0131 izleme gibi \u00f6rg\u00fctsel kodlamalar\u0131n yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 faaliyetler i\u00e7erisinde oldu\u011fu, eve getirilen de\u011fi\u015fik ya\u015f gruplar\u0131ndaki ortaokul ve lise \u00f6\u011frencileri ile \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn ama\u00e7 ve stratejisi do\u011frultusunda birebir ilgilenmek suretiyle \u00f6rg\u00fct i\u00e7erisinde b\u00f6lge lise mesul\u00fc olarak g\u00f6rev \u00fcstlendi\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Delil olarak di\u011ferlerinin yan\u0131 s\u0131ra ba\u015fvurucunun etkin pi\u015fmanl\u0131k kapsam\u0131nda al\u0131nan beyanlar\u0131na ve tan\u0131k S.\u00c7’nin soru\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun \u00f6rg\u00fct i\u00e7erisinde lise \u00f6\u011frencilerinden sorumlu oldu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki beyanlar\u0131na dayan\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u00d6rg\u00fct mensuplar\u0131 aras\u0131nda \u00f6rg\u00fctsel bilinci g\u00fc\u00e7lendirmek amac\u0131yla b\u00fct\u00fcn masraflar\u0131n \u00f6rg\u00fct taraf\u0131ndan kar\u015f\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131, ba\u015fvurucunun \u00f6rg\u00fcte ait okul, yurt ve di\u011fer tesislerin tan\u0131t\u0131m\u0131 yap\u0131lan yurt i\u00e7i ve yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131 gezilere kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, Burak kod ad\u0131n\u0131 kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131, astsubay haz\u0131rlama okulu s\u0131navlar\u0131na y\u00f6nlendirilmek suretiyle Bal\u0131kesir Astsubay Haz\u0131rlama Okuluna yerle\u015ftirildi\u011fi, \u00e7e\u015fitlilik, s\u00fcreklilik ve yo\u011funluk arz eden eylemlerinin bulundu\u011fu ve b\u00f6ylelikle FET\u00d6\/PDY ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn \u00fcyesi oldu\u011fu kanaatine var\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddia edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. \u0130ddianamenin kabul\u00fc ile a\u00e7\u0131lan dava, \u00c7ank\u0131r\u0131 A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinde (Mahkeme) g\u00f6r\u00fclmeye ba\u015flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucunun m\u00fcdafiinin haz\u0131r bulundu\u011fu 3\/7\/2017 tarihinde yap\u0131lan duru\u015fmada iddianame ve ekleri okunmu\u015f, ba\u015fvurucunun savunmas\u0131 al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu savunmas\u0131nda \u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyesi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015f ve kod ad\u0131 kullanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade etmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu kod ad\u0131 kullanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin ifadesinde; kollukta ifade al\u0131n\u0131rken ikinci bir ismi olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n soruldu\u011funu, ailesinin kendisine “Bayram” diye hitap etti\u011fini ama “Burhan” ismini kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi\u011fini, Ey\u00fcp isimli \u015fahs\u0131n “Sana ‘Burhan’ diye hitap edelim.” demesi \u00fczerine kendisine bu \u015fekilde hitap edildi\u011fini, ifadesinde “Burak” ismi ile hitap edildi\u011fini s\u00f6ylemedi\u011fini, “Burhan” ismi ile hitap edildi\u011fini s\u00f6yledi\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Duru\u015fman\u0131n 22\/8\/2017 tarihli ikinci celsesinde tan\u0131k S.\u00c7. dinlenmi\u015ftir. Tan\u0131k beyan\u0131nda \u00fcniversite y\u0131llar\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucu ile FET\u00d6\/PDY yap\u0131s\u0131na d\u00e2hil evde kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ba\u015fvurucunun G\u00fcrcistan gezisine kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve 2012 y\u0131l\u0131nda bu evden ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. Mahkeme 14\/12\/2018 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucunun silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan 3 y\u0131l 1 ay 15 g\u00fcn hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. Gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“San\u0131\u011f\u0131n etkin pi\u015fmanl\u0131k kapsam\u0131ndaki ikrar i\u00e7erikli anlat\u0131mlar\u0131, tan\u0131k beyan\u0131 ve di\u011fer t\u00fcm delillerden anla\u015f\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere; 15\/07\/2016 tarihinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen hain darbe te\u015febb\u00fcs\u00fc \u00f6ncesinde askeri \u00f6\u011frenci olan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n 2010 y\u0131l\u0131nda \u00c7ank\u0131r\u0131 Karatekin \u00dcniversitesi Tarih B\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fc kazand\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve 2014 y\u0131l\u0131nda mezun oldu\u011fu, mezun olduktan yakla\u015f\u0131k olarak 6 ay kadar sonra formasyon e\u011fitimi i\u00e7in \u00c7ank\u0131r\u0131 Karatekin \u00dcniversitesine ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131, formasyonu tamamlamas\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan 2015 y\u0131l\u0131nda \u015eubat- Mart ay\u0131 gibi \u0130stanbul’a d\u00f6nd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, bu s\u00fcre zarf\u0131nda \u00c7ank\u0131r\u0131’da \u00f6rg\u00fcte ait farkl\u0131 farkl\u0131 evlerde kald\u0131\u011f\u0131, s\u00fcre\u00e7 i\u00e7erisinde BURAK KOD ADINI kullan\u0131p bu evlerde b\u00f6lge lise mesul\u00fc g\u00f6revini \u00fcstlenerek \u00f6rg\u00fct i\u00e7erisine al\u0131nmak istenen\/\u00f6rg\u00fct i\u00e7erisinde yer alan lise \u00f6\u011frencileri ile ilgilendi\u011fi (onlara ders \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131rman\u0131n yan\u0131s\u0131ra \u00f6rg\u00fctsel bilincin yerle\u015ftirilmesine y\u00f6nelik \u00f6rg\u00fct liderine ait kitaplar\u0131 okuma, videolar\u0131 izletme gibi faaliyetlerde bulunmas\u0131) \u015feklinde ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan eylemleriyle yukar\u0131da yer verilen Yarg\u0131tay 16. Ceza Dairesi’nin ve Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulu’nun kararlar\u0131nda ifade edilen Fet\u00f6\/Pdy’nin ama\u00e7lar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn talimatlar\u0131na uygun hareket etti\u011fi hususlar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fc nihai amac\u0131n\u0131 bilmedi\u011finden s\u00f6z edilemeyece\u011fi, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n Fet\u00f6\/Pdy silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn kurulu\u015f ama\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131, faaliyet ve eylemlerini benimseyerek g\u00f6n\u00fcll\u00fc olarak \u00f6rg\u00fct hiyerar\u015fisine dahil olmay\u0131 tercih etti\u011fi g\u00f6zetilerek san\u0131k Burhan Bayram \u015eAH\u0130N’in \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 Fet\u00f6\/Pdy Silahl\u0131 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00dcye Olma su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.”<\/p>\n
7. Ba\u015fvurucu ve m\u00fcdafiinin bu karara kar\u015f\u0131 yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 istinaf ba\u015fvurusu Ankara B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 22. Ceza Dairesinin 24\/12\/2019 tarihli karar\u0131yla esastan reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. Yarg\u0131tay 16. Ceza Dairesi 17\/5\/2021 tarihinde temyiz talebinin reddi ile h\u00fckm\u00fcn onanmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fvurucu 18\/11\/2021 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
10. Komisyon; gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131, su\u00e7 ve cezalar\u0131n kanunili\u011fi ilkesi ve hakkaniyete uygun yarg\u0131lama hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki \u015fik\u00e2yetlerin kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa, an\u0131lan hak ve ilkelere ili\u015fkin \u015fik\u00e2yetlerin kabul edilebilirlik incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucunun adli yard\u0131m talebi Komisyonca kabul edilerek yarg\u0131lama giderlerinden ge\u00e7ici olarak muaf tutulmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
A. Su\u00e7ta ve Cezada Kanunilik \u0130lkesinin \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
11. Ba\u015fvurucu, i\u015flendi\u011fi iddia edilen tarihte su\u00e7 olarak d\u00fczenlenmeyen eylemlere dayal\u0131 olarak cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle su\u00e7ta ve cezada kanunilik ilkesinin ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
12. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde; Mahkemece gerek\u00e7eli kararda ba\u015fvurucunun \u00fcniversite d\u00f6neminde ve mezun olduktan sonra \u00f6rg\u00fct evlerinde kald\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u00f6rg\u00fct i\u00e7erisinde kod ad\u0131 kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve \u00f6rg\u00fctte hiyerar\u015fik pozisyonu oldu\u011funa dair tespitlerin ba\u015fvurucunun kendi beyanlar\u0131yla, tan\u0131k anlat\u0131mlar\u0131yla ve dosya kapsam\u0131nda yer alan di\u011fer delillerle sabit oldu\u011fu kanaatine var\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle ba\u015fvurucunun mahk\u00fbmiyetine karar verildi\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca mevcut ba\u015fvuruda su\u00e7ta ve cezada kanunilik ilkesinin ihlal edilip edilmedi\u011fi konusunda Anayasa Mahkemesi i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131 ile somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi ifade edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 cevab\u0131nda ba\u015fvuru formundaki iddialar\u0131n\u0131 yinelemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
13. Su\u00e7ta ve cezada kanunilik ilkesi hukuk devletinin kurucu unsurlar\u0131ndand\u0131r. Kanunilik ilkesinin genel olarak b\u00fct\u00fcn hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerin d\u00fczenlenmesinde temel bir g\u00fcvence olu\u015fturman\u0131n yan\u0131 s\u0131ra su\u00e7 ve cezalar\u0131n belirlenmesi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan \u00f6zel bir anlam\u0131 ve \u00f6nemi olup bu kapsamda ki\u015filerin kanunen yasaklanmam\u0131\u015f veya yapt\u0131r\u0131ma ba\u011flanmam\u0131\u015f fiillerden dolay\u0131 keyf\u00ee bir \u015fekilde su\u00e7lanmalar\u0131 ve cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmalar\u0131 \u00f6nlenmekte; buna ek olarak su\u00e7lanan ki\u015finin lehine olan d\u00fczenlemelerin geriye etkili bir \u015fekilde uygulanmas\u0131 sa\u011flanmaktad\u0131r (Karlis A.\u015e., B. No: 2013\/849, 15\/4\/2014, \u00a7 32; Adnan \u015een [GK], \u00a7 104; Bilal Celalettin \u015ea\u015fmaz, \u00a7 60).<\/p>\n
14. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 38. maddesine ko\u015fut olarak 26\/9\/2004 tarihli ve 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu\u2019nun 2. maddesinde de d\u00fczenlenen ilke, yasaklanan eylemlerin ve bu yasak eylemlere verilecek cezalar\u0131n hi\u00e7bir ku\u015fkuya yer b\u0131rakmayacak bi\u00e7imde kanunda g\u00f6sterilmesini, kural\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k, anla\u015f\u0131l\u0131r ve s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131n belli olmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirmektedir. Ki\u015filerin yasak eylemleri \u00f6nceden bilmeleri d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesine dayanan bu ilkeyle temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerin g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131 ama\u00e7lanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (Fikriye Aytin ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2013\/6154, 11\/12\/2014, \u00a7 51; AYM, E.2010\/69, K.2011\/116, 7\/7\/2011; AYM, E.2019\/9, K.2019\/27, 11\/4\/2019, \u00a7 13; Bilal Celalettin \u015ea\u015fmaz, \u00a7 61).<\/p>\n
15. Ceza verme yetkisinin keyf\u00ee ve hukuk d\u0131\u015f\u0131 ama\u00e7larla kullan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6nlenebilmesi kanunilik ilkesinin kat\u0131 bir \u015fekilde uygulanmas\u0131yla m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olabilir. Bu kapsamda yarg\u0131 organlar\u0131nca yap\u0131lacak yorumun ceza normlar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6z\u00fcyle \u00e7eli\u015fmemesi ve \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclebilir olmas\u0131 gerekir. Yarg\u0131 organlar\u0131, ter\u00f6r su\u00e7lar\u0131 da d\u00e2hil olmak \u00fczere t\u00fcm su\u00e7lar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan su\u00e7a veya cezaya ili\u015fkin olgular\u0131 de\u011ferlendirirken, \u00f6zellikle fiillerin bir su\u00e7a kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k gelip gelmedi\u011fini belirlerken su\u00e7ta ve cezada kanunilik ilkesini anlams\u0131z k\u0131lacak \u015fekilde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclemez bir yakla\u015f\u0131mda bulunmamal\u0131d\u0131r (Mehmet Emin Karamehmet ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2017\/4902, 28\/1\/2020, \u00a7 47; Adnan \u015een, \u00a7 107; Bilal Celalettin \u015ea\u015fmaz, \u00a7 62). Bu kapsamda somut olayda de\u011ferlendirilmesi gereken, ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7unun kapsam\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclemez \u015fekilde san\u0131\u011f\u0131n aleyhine olarak geni\u015fletici bir yoruma tabi tutulup tutulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131d\u0131r (Ahmet Aslan, B. No: 2021\/23949, 6\/10\/2022, \u00a7 68; Bilal Celalettin \u015ea\u015fmaz, \u00a7 62). Bu nedenle su\u00e7ta ve cezada kanunilik ilkesinin denetlenmesinde normun mevcut deliller \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde somut olaya uygulan\u0131\u015f bi\u00e7iminin yasal d\u00fczenlemeyle ba\u011fda\u015fmaz ve \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclemez bir sonuca yol a\u00e7\u0131p a\u00e7mad\u0131\u011f\u0131 incelenmelidir (Bilal Celalettin \u015ea\u015fmaz, \u00a7 62).<\/p>\n
16. Ba\u015fvuruya konu mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn kanuni dayana\u011f\u0131 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 314. maddesidir. Yarg\u0131 mercilerine g\u00f6re bir su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc, ba\u015ftan itibaren su\u00e7 i\u015flemek \u00fczere kurulmu\u015f yasa d\u0131\u015f\u0131 bir yap\u0131 olabilece\u011fi gibi yasal olarak faaliyet g\u00f6stermekte olan bir sivil toplum \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn sonradan su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne hatta ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015fmesi de m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr (Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulunun 26\/9\/2017 tarihli ve E.2017\/16.MD-956, K.2017\/370 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131).<\/p>\n
17. Bir ki\u015finin yasa d\u0131\u015f\u0131 \u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyeli\u011fi su\u00e7undan cezaland\u0131r\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in hen\u00fcz bir su\u00e7 i\u015flemi\u015f olmas\u0131 gerekmez. \u00d6rg\u00fct \u00fcyeli\u011fi ba\u015fl\u0131 ba\u015f\u0131na cezaland\u0131r\u0131lan bir su\u00e7tur. Bu itibarla \u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyesinin faaliyetinin mutlaka \u00f6rg\u00fct taraf\u0131ndan ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen su\u00e7lara kat\u0131lma \u015feklinde olmas\u0131 da gerekmez. Ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7u, \u00fcye ve hatta \u00f6rg\u00fct hen\u00fcz bir su\u00e7 i\u015flememi\u015f olsa dahi \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn toplum i\u00e7in yaratt\u0131\u011f\u0131 tehlikeyi cezaland\u0131ran ve bu y\u00f6n\u00fcyle bir yandan da \u00f6rg\u00fct faaliyetleri kapsam\u0131nda su\u00e7 i\u015flenmesini engelleme amac\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131yan bir su\u00e7 t\u00fcr\u00fcd\u00fcr (Metin Birdal, \u00a7\u00a7 60, 61).<\/p>\n
18. Bir olu\u015fumun ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc oldu\u011funa dair kesinle\u015fmi\u015f yarg\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n su\u00e7un unsurlar\u0131ndan biri olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n alt\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6nemle \u00e7izmek gerekir. \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fcn niteliklerinin mahkemece belirlenmesi bir tespit karar\u0131d\u0131r (Bilal Celalettin \u015ea\u015fmaz, \u00a7 14). Aksinin kabul\u00fc, hakk\u0131nda kesinle\u015fmi\u015f yarg\u0131 karar\u0131 bulunmayan ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fctlerinin eylemlerinin unsur yoklu\u011fu nedeniyle cezaland\u0131r\u0131lamamas\u0131 sonucunu do\u011furur. Yukar\u0131da al\u0131nt\u0131lanan Yarg\u0131tay i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131n\u0131n da g\u00f6sterdi\u011fi gibi bir olu\u015fumun ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc olarak tespitine dair kesinle\u015fmi\u015f yarg\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n bu su\u00e7 \u00f6zelinde en \u00f6nemli fonksiyonu, ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne hukuki varl\u0131k kazand\u0131rmas\u0131 ve bu ba\u011flamda yap\u0131n\u0131n bir ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc oldu\u011funu bilinebilecek h\u00e2le getirmesidir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla hen\u00fcz ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc oldu\u011funa dair yarg\u0131 kararlar\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla herkes\u00e7e bir ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc olarak bilinebilir h\u00e2le gelmedi\u011fi s\u0131rada bir \u00f6rg\u00fct ile irtibatl\u0131 ve iltisakl\u0131 olan ki\u015filerin kas\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n ortaya konulmas\u0131 hayati \u00f6nemdedir (Ahmet Aslan, \u00a7\u00a7 50-51; Bilal Celalettin \u015ea\u015fmaz, \u00a7 50).<\/p>\n
19. O h\u00e2lde bir kimsenin FET\u00d6\/PDY’ye \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan cezaland\u0131r\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn niteli\u011fini ve ama\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 bildi\u011fi, \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn bir par\u00e7as\u0131 olmay\u0131 istedi\u011fi ve \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn hayatta kalmas\u0131na, ama\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmesine devaml\u0131 bir irade ile katk\u0131 sa\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6sterilmesi gerekir. Bu gereklili\u011fin bir sonucu olarak Yarg\u0131tay ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma veya yard\u0131m etme su\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n do\u011frudan kas\u0131t ve \u00f6zel saikle i\u015flenebilen su\u00e7lar oldu\u011fu da g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde FET\u00d6\/PDY’nin ger\u00e7ek y\u00fcz\u00fcn\u00fc ortaya koyan operasyonlara ba\u015fland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu yap\u0131n\u0131n kamuoyu ve medya taraf\u0131ndan tart\u0131\u015f\u0131l\u0131r h\u00e2le geldi\u011fini, \u00fcst d\u00fczey h\u00fck\u00fbmet yetkilileri ve kamu g\u00f6revlileri taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan a\u00e7\u0131klamalarda paralel yap\u0131 veya ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc oldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin tespitler ve uyar\u0131lar\u0131n yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, Mill\u00ee G\u00fcvenlik Kurulu taraf\u0131ndan da ayn\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmelerin payla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcre\u00e7ten \u00f6nce icra edilen faaliyetlerin nitelik, i\u00e7erik ve mahiyeti itibar\u0131yla ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn amac\u0131na hizmet etti\u011fi ve san\u0131klarca da bunun bilindi\u011fi somut delil ve olgularla ortaya konulmad\u0131k\u00e7a \u00f6rg\u00fctsel faaliyet kapsam\u0131nda kabul edilemeyece\u011fini, ki\u015filerin hukuki durumlar\u0131n\u0131n kusurluluk ve hata ba\u011flam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirilmesinde zaruret bulundu\u011funu ifade etmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fka bir deyi\u015fle Yarg\u0131tay bir ki\u015finin s\u00f6z konusu \u00f6rg\u00fcte \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in sempati ve iltisak boyutunu a\u015farak ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc niteli\u011fini ve ama\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 bilerek \u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyesi oldu\u011funu ispat etmeye yeterli delillere dayan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 \u015fart ko\u015fmaktad\u0131r (Bilal Celalettin \u015ea\u015fmaz, \u00a7\u00a7 11-19, 51).<\/p>\n
20. Bu sebeple Yarg\u0131tay FET\u00d6\/PDY davalar\u0131nda da \u00f6rg\u00fcte sadece sempati duymay\u0131 ya da \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn ama\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131, de\u011ferlerini, ideolojisini benimsemek, buna ili\u015fkin yay\u0131nlar\u0131 okumak, bulundurmak, \u00f6rg\u00fct liderine sayg\u0131 duymak gibi eylemleri ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan mahk\u00fbmiyet i\u00e7in yeterli g\u00f6rmemektedir. Yarg\u0131taya g\u00f6re FET\u00d6\/PDY \u00fcyesinin \u00f6rg\u00fcte bilerek ve isteyerek kat\u0131lmas\u0131, kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn niteli\u011fini ve ama\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 bilmesi, ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn bir par\u00e7as\u0131 olmay\u0131 istemesi, \u00f6rg\u00fcte kat\u0131lma iradesinin devaml\u0131l\u0131k arz etmesi, saikinin su\u00e7 i\u015flemek olmas\u0131 \u015fart\u0131 aranmal\u0131d\u0131r (Yarg\u0131tay karar\u0131 i\u00e7in bkz. Bilal Celalettin \u015ea\u015fmaz, \u00a7 13).<\/p>\n
21. Yukar\u0131daki de\u011ferlendirmelerden hareket eden ve FET\u00d6\/PDY’nin g\u00fcvenlik g\u00fc\u00e7lerince \u00f6nemli \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmlenen hiyerar\u015fik yap\u0131lanmas\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6zeten Yarg\u0131tay; \u00fcst d\u00fczeyde bulunan \u00f6rg\u00fct mensuplar\u0131n\u0131n kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn niteliklerini, ama\u00e7 ve y\u00f6ntemlerini bildi\u011finin, su\u00e7 i\u015flemek saiki ile hareket etti\u011finin, ayr\u0131ca \u00f6rg\u00fcte kat\u0131lma iradesinin devaml\u0131l\u0131k arz etti\u011finin kabul edilmesi gerekti\u011fi sonucuna varm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Yarg\u0131tay, FET\u00d6\/PDY’nin olduk\u00e7a uzun s\u00fcre yasal zeminde faaliyet g\u00f6stermesi ve nihai amac\u0131n\u0131 gizli tutmas\u0131 nedeniyle \u00f6zellikle s\u00f6zde me\u015fruiyet vitrini olarak kullan\u0131lan katlar\u0131yla irtibatl\u0131 oldu\u011fu tespit edilen ki\u015filerin \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn nihai amac\u0131n\u0131 bildi\u011finin ortaya konmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini kabul etmi\u015ftir (Bilal Celalettin \u015ea\u015fmaz, \u00a7\u00a7 11-13, 19; ayr\u0131ca bkz. Adnan \u015een, \u00a7 114; \u0130lhami Aksu, \u00a7 21).<\/p>\n
22. Yarg\u0131 mercilerinin de\u011ferlendirmelerinden \u00e7\u0131kan sonuca g\u00f6re FET\u00d6\/PDY’nin daha alt katlar\u0131yla irtibatl\u0131 oldu\u011fu tespit eden ki\u015filerin -\u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn nihai amac\u0131n\u0131 bildikleri ortaya konmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 m\u00fcddet\u00e7e- \u00f6rg\u00fcte bir ahlak ve e\u011fitim hareketi, g\u00f6n\u00fcll\u00fcler hareketi, din\u00ee bir cemaat oldu\u011fu zann\u0131 ile sempati duyduklar\u0131, \u00f6rg\u00fctle irtibat ve iltisakl\u0131 olduklar\u0131 kabul edilmektedir. Ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7una ba\u011flanan a\u011f\u0131r cezai yapt\u0131r\u0131mlar g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde -\u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn nihai amac\u0131n\u0131n herkes\u00e7e bilindi\u011finin kabul edilebilece\u011fi kesin bir tarih vermek yoluna gidilmemi\u015f olmakla birlikte- \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn nihai amac\u0131n\u0131n herkes\u00e7e bilinir h\u00e2le geldi\u011fi olaylardan (Bilal Celalettin \u015ea\u015fmaz, \u00a7 11) \u00f6nce yasal zeminde faaliyet g\u00f6steren bir sivil toplum \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne ba\u011fl\u0131 oldu\u011fu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesi ile hareket ederek hataya d\u00fc\u015fenler ile FET\u00d6\/PDY’nin ama\u00e7 ve y\u00f6ntemlerini bilen \u00f6rg\u00fct mensuplar\u0131n\u0131n birbirlerinden dikkatli bir \u015fekilde ayr\u0131lmas\u0131 yoluna gidilmi\u015ftir (Bilal Celalettin \u015ea\u015fmaz, \u00a7 54).<\/p>\n
23. \u00d6te yandan vurgulamak gerekir ki bireysel ba\u015fvuru yolunda Anayasa Mahkemesinin g\u00f6revi bir yarg\u0131laman\u0131n sonucu itibar\u0131yla adil olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmek de\u011fildir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucular hakk\u0131nda isnat edilen ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc \u00fcyesi olma su\u00e7unun s\u00fcbuta erip ermedi\u011fi veya toplanan delillerin su\u00e7un s\u00fcbutu i\u00e7in yeterli olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 meselesi, ilkesel olarak Anayasa Mahkemesinin ilgi alan\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndad\u0131r (Metin Birdal, \u00a7 47; Y\u0131lmaz \u00c7elik [GK], B. No: 2014\/13117, 19\/7\/2018, \u00a7 45). Bundan ba\u015fka bir ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131nda hangi delillerin h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nabilece\u011fi meselesi de esas itibar\u0131yla Anayasa Mahkemesinin g\u00f6rev alan\u0131n\u0131n d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndad\u0131r (T\u00fcrk ceza muhakemesi hukuku uygulamas\u0131na ili\u015fkin baz\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7in bkz. Metin Birdal, \u00a7\u00a7 67-71).<\/p>\n
24. Di\u011fer yandan Anayasa Mahkemesi Metin Birdal karar\u0131nda, temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fckler kapsam\u0131nda kalan birtak\u0131m eylemlerin ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc \u00fcyeli\u011fi su\u00e7undan mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131nda delil olarak de\u011ferlendirilmesini incelemi\u015ftir (Metin Birdal, \u00a7\u00a7 60-72). Anayasa Mahkemesine g\u00f6re yarg\u0131 mercilerince ba\u015fvurucunun ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn hiyerar\u015fik yap\u0131s\u0131na d\u00e2hil oldu\u011funu g\u00f6steren deliller birlikte incelenmeli; temel haklar kapsam\u0131nda kalan her bir delil ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn amac\u0131, niteli\u011fi, bilinirli\u011fi, kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015fiddetin t\u00fcr\u00fc ve yo\u011funlu\u011fu ile somut olay\u0131n ilgili di\u011fer \u015fartlar\u0131 dikkate al\u0131narak de\u011ferlendirilmelidir (Metin Birdal, \u00a7 72).<\/p>\n
25. Somut olayda Mahkemenin, ba\u015fvurucunun ikrar\u0131na ve tan\u0131k beyan\u0131na delil olarak dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Buna g\u00f6re gerek\u00e7eli kararda; darbe te\u015febb\u00fcs\u00fc \u00f6ncesinde askeri \u00f6\u011frenci olan ba\u015fvurucunun 2010 y\u0131l\u0131nda \u00fcniversiteyi kazand\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve 2014 y\u0131l\u0131nda mezun oldu\u011fu, mezun olduktan yakla\u015f\u0131k olarak alt\u0131 ay kadar sonra ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 formasyonu tamamlamas\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan 2015 y\u0131l\u0131 \u015eubat- Mart ay\u0131 gibi \u0130stanbul’a d\u00f6nd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc belirtilmi\u015ftir. Gerek\u00e7eli kararda ayr\u0131ca; ba\u015fvurucunun t\u00fcm bu s\u00fcre zarf\u0131nda \u00c7ank\u0131r\u0131’da \u00f6rg\u00fcte ait farkl\u0131 farkl\u0131 evlerde kald\u0131\u011f\u0131, s\u00fcre\u00e7 i\u00e7erisinde “Burak” kod ad\u0131n\u0131 kullan\u0131p bu evlerde b\u00f6lge lise mesul\u00fc g\u00f6revini \u00fcstlenerek \u00f6rg\u00fct i\u00e7erisine al\u0131nmak istenen\/\u00f6rg\u00fct i\u00e7erisinde yer alan lise \u00f6\u011frencileri ile ilgilendi\u011fi, onlara ders \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131rman\u0131n yan\u0131s\u0131ra \u00f6rg\u00fctsel bilincin yerle\u015ftirilmesine y\u00f6nelik \u00f6rg\u00fct liderine ait kitaplar\u0131 okuma, videolar\u0131 izletme gibi faaliyetlerde bulundu\u011fu ifade edilerek bu eylemleriyle \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn nihai amac\u0131n\u0131 bilmedi\u011finden s\u00f6z edilemeyece\u011fi ve g\u00f6n\u00fcll\u00fc olarak \u00f6rg\u00fct hiyerar\u015fisine d\u00e2hil olmay\u0131 tercih etti\u011fi tespitleri yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (bkz. \u00a7 6 ).<\/p>\n
26. B\u00f6ylelikle Mahkemenin, dosya kapsam\u0131ndaki t\u00fcm delilleri bir b\u00fct\u00fcn olarak de\u011ferlendirmek suretiyle olu\u015fturdu\u011fu kabul\u00fcn somut olay\u0131n ko\u015fullar\u0131na g\u00f6re temelsiz ve keyf\u00ee olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 vurgulanmal\u0131d\u0131r. Nitekim Mahkeme, \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn nihai amac\u0131n\u0131n herkes\u00e7e bilinir h\u00e2le geldi\u011fi olaylardan sonra dahi ba\u015fvurucunun ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc hiyerar\u015fisi i\u00e7erisinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi \u00f6rg\u00fctsel faaliyetlerin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ortaya koyarak \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn nihai amac\u0131n\u0131 bildi\u011fi sonucuna varm\u0131\u015f ve bu y\u00f6ndeki savunmalar\u0131na itibar etmemi\u015ftir. Mahkemenin bu yorumunun kanun koyucunun yasak olarak belirledi\u011fi fiilin kapsam\u0131n\u0131 su\u00e7 ve cezalar\u0131n kanunili\u011fi ilkesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olacak \u015fekilde geni\u015fletmedi\u011fi, \u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyeli\u011fine ili\u015fkin kural\u0131n \u00f6z\u00fcyle \u00e7eli\u015fmedi\u011fi ve \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclebilir oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Mahkeme, at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7un unsurlar\u0131n\u0131 netle\u015ftirirken \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclebilir ve su\u00e7un mahiyetine uygun olma konusunda \u00f6zen g\u00f6stermi\u015ftir. Buna g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucunun yukar\u0131da an\u0131lan eylemleri dolay\u0131s\u0131yla bu olu\u015fumun su\u00e7 i\u015flemek amac\u0131nda oldu\u011funa ve \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 \u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyeli\u011fi su\u00e7unun unsurlar\u0131n\u0131 bilebilecek konumda bulundu\u011funa ili\u015fkin var\u0131lan sonucun temelsiz oldu\u011fu s\u00f6ylenemez.<\/p>\n
27. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla Anayasa’n\u0131n 38. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan su\u00e7ta ve cezada kanunilik ilkesine y\u00f6nelik bir ihlalin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k oldu\u011fu sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
28. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurunun bu k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
B. Di\u011fer \u0130hlal \u0130ddialar\u0131<\/p>\n
29. Ba\u015fvurucunun adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda hakkaniyete uygun yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131n\u0131n Ahmet Sa\u011flam (B. No: 2013\/3351, 18\/9\/2013, \u00a7\u00a7 43-46.) karar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda; gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131n\u0131n ise Yasemin Ek\u015fi (B. No: 2013\/5486, 4\/12\/2013, \u00a7\u00a7 56, 57) ve Sencer Ba\u015fat ve di\u011ferleri ([GK], B. No: 2013\/7800, 18\/6\/2014, \u00a7\u00a7 31-39) kararlar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. H\u00dcK\u00dcM <\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. 1.Su\u00e7ta ve cezada kanunilik ilkesinin ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
2. Di\u011fer ihlal iddialar\u0131n\u0131n kabul edilebilirlik kriterlerini kar\u015f\u0131lamamas\u0131 nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. 12\/1\/2011 tarihli ve 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu\u2019nun 339. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca tahsil edilmesi ma\u011fduriyetine neden olaca\u011f\u0131ndan adli yard\u0131m talebi kabul edilen ba\u015fvurucunun yarg\u0131lama giderlerini \u00f6demekten TAMAMEN MUAF TUTULMASINA, 31\/10\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 31\/10\/2024 tarihli ve 2021\/55423 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 BURHAN BAYRAM \u015eAH\u0130N BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/55423) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 31\/10\/2024 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130rfan F\u0130DAN \u00a0 \u00a0 Muhterem \u0130NCE \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6rler : Ay\u00e7a GAN\u0130DA\u011eLI DEM\u0130RC\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 Denizhan HOROZG\u0130L Ba\u015fvurucu : Burhan Bayram \u015eAH\u0130N Vekili : Av. Ekrem KAYA \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc \u00fcyeli\u011fi su\u00e7uyla ilgili yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131sal yorumlar\u0131n \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclebilir olmamas\u0131 nedeniyle su\u00e7ta ve cezada kanunilik ilkesinin ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. Ba\u015fvuruda ayr\u0131ca adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n farkl\u0131 g\u00fcvencelerinin ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131 da bulunmaktad\u0131r. 2. \u00c7ank\u0131r\u0131 Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) Fetullah\u00e7\u0131 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc\/Paralel Devlet Yap\u0131lanmas\u0131 (FET\u00d6\/PDY) \u00fcyesi oldu\u011fu \u015f\u00fcphesiyle ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda soru\u015fturma ba\u015flatm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Soru\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda etkin pi\u015fmanl\u0131k h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinden yararlanma talebinde bulunan ba\u015fvurucu, ifadesinde \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn faaliyetleri hakk\u0131nda detayl\u0131 beyanda bulunmu\u015ftur. \u00c7ank\u0131r\u0131’da \u00fcniversite e\u011fitimi ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 d\u00f6nemde cemaat yap\u0131lanmas\u0131na ait evlerde kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, eve gelen \u00f6\u011frencilerin T\u00fcrk\u00e7e ve Tarih derslerine ait sorular\u0131n\u0131 cevaplad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kendisine bu evde Burak ismi ile hitap edildi\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir. Kendisine neden Burak ismi ile hitap ettiklerini sordu\u011funda, dini bir isim o y\u00fczden Burak diyoruz \u015feklinde cevap verdiklerini a\u00e7\u0131klam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 3. Soru\u015fturma neticesinde Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucunun silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-25126","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n